53530285-HUL-PPT

download 53530285-HUL-PPT

of 18

Transcript of 53530285-HUL-PPT

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    1/18

    Click to edit Master subtitle style

    4/28/12

    PROJECT ON

    FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF HUL

    BY:PRITIKA JAGDALE :18KANCHAN PATEL : 34AMOL PAWAR : 36

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    2/18

    Click to edit Master subtitle style

    4/28/12

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    3/18

    4/28/12

    OBJECTIVEGROWTH AND MARKET SHARE

    INDUSTRY DATA

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    4/18

    4/28/12

    MARKET SHARE OF HUL

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    5/18

    4/28/12

    Product

    ofHUL

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    6/18

    4/28/12

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    7/184/28/12

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    8/184/28/12

    RATIOS

    Profitability Ratio :

    Return on Capital Ratio :

    Years 2010 2009 2007 2006

    Ratio 104.78 121.81 140.49 66.58

    Return onEquity Ratio :

    Years 2010 2009 2007 2006

    Ratio 77.98 116.60 120.88 56.53

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    9/184/28/12

    Turnover Ratio :

    Debtor Turnover

    Ratio :Years 2010 2009 2007 2006Ratio 25.83 37.70 30.84 27.48

    Years 2010 2009 2007 2006Ratio 14.13 9.68 11.83 13.28

    Debtor CollectionPeriod Ratio :

    Solvency Ratio :

    Debt EquityRatio :Years 2010 2009 2007 2006

    Ratio 0.00 0.20 0.06 0.03

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    10/18

    4/28/12

    Common Size Statement

    vProfit and loss A/C

    In the current year the PAT of hul has beendecreased to 0.38 %(2010-11.50% ,2009-

    11.88%) in the previous year ,there is need forimprovement in profitability.

    Further analysis indicates that there isprofitability have been more because therehave been decrease in operating expense i.e.2010 85.46% as compared to previous years09,07,06.

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    11/18

    4/28/12

    vBalance sheet

    It show that current assets as a percentage oftotal asset have decreased as2010 17.76% iscompared with 2009 where as if we compared

    with 2007 &2006 then in 2010 there is increasedin current asset .

    Loan &advances have decreased (7.27%) which

    a good sign for as compared with 09,07,06.

    The current liabilities in 2010 has been increased

    as compared with the 09,07,06. But thereoverall facts signals that there is satisfactory

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    12/18

    4/28/12

    COMPARATIVE STATEMENT

    In 2009 2010

    The PAT has been decreased by 16.18% .

    Further analysis indicates there e will beprofitability because there is decrease inoperating expenses by 14.83%.

    In 2007 2009

    The PAT has been increased by 38.15%, thisreflecting improvement in efficiency ofmanufacturing operation.

    Further analysis indicates that profitability would

    have been more but for an increase in operating

    vProfit and lossA/C

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    13/18

    4/28/12

    In 2006 2007

    The PAT has been increased by 13% , thisreflecting improvement in efficiency ofmanufacturing operation.

    Futher analysis indicates tht profitability

    would have been more but for an increase inoperating expenses by 12.83%.

    vBalance sheet

    In 2009 2010

    It show that current assets as a percentage oftotal asset have decreased by 4.16%.Inventorieshave been decrease by 13.80%.

    The current liabilities in 2010 has been

    increased by 16.41%,these fact signal overall

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    14/18

    4/28/12

    In 2007 2009

    It show that current assets as a percentageof total asset have increased by70.90%.Inventories have been increased by29.45%.

    The current liabilities in 2010 has beenincreased by 13.16%, these fact signal overallincrease in liquidity position of the firm .

    In 2006 2007

    It show that current assets as a percentageof total asset have increased by3.40%.Inventories have been increased by

    26.22%.

    The current liabilities in 2010 has beenincreased by 13.00%,these fact signal overall

    increase in liquidity position of the firm .

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    15/18

    4/28/12

    PORTER'S FIVE FORCES MODEL

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    16/18

    4/28/12

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    17/18

    4/28/12

    A proposal was made to increase theallocation of Bharat Nirman programme

    Remuneration was increased under theNREGA scheme

    MAT has been increased from 18% to 18.5%Overall the budget has been positive

    for the HUL especially when the FMCG

    sector is kneeling under surging inputcosts and high inflation.

    IMPACT OF BUDGET

    2011

  • 8/3/2019 53530285-HUL-PPT

    18/18

    4/28/12

    HUL derives more than 50% of its sales from ruralmarkets

    Better infrastructure facilities will improve their

    supply chainHUL have immense possibilities for growthIncreased focus on farm sector will boost rural

    incomes

    CONCLUSION &

    RECOMMENDATION