5.20 REALTIME FORECASTING OF SHALLOW LANDSLIDES USING ...
Transcript of 5.20 REALTIME FORECASTING OF SHALLOW LANDSLIDES USING ...
5.20 REALTIME FORECASTING OF SHALLOW LANDSLIDES
USING RADAR-DERIVED RAINFALL
Ryohei Misumi *, Masayuki Maki, Koyuru Iwanami, Ken-ichi Maruyama and Sang-Goon Park
National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention,
Tsukuba, JAPAN
1. INTRODUCTION
Shallow landslides induced by heavy rainfall
sometimes cause heavy damages to human lives and
properties. For example, the torrential rain in
Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan, on 29 June 1999 killed
more than 30 people mainly by shallow landslides.
Recently, Niigata-Fukushima heavy rainfall on 13 July
2004 caused devastating disasters (Fig.1). One of the
possible ways to reduce such disasters is forecast of
landslides.
A trigger of shallow landslides is the increment of
pore pressure above an impermeable layer
underground due to infiltration of rainwater. Therefore,
an accurate estimation of rainfall on slopes and
calculation of underground flow are the important
factors for landslide forecasting. Okimura and
Ichikawa (1985) developed a shallow landslide model
incorporating hydrological calculation of groundwater
flow. In their method the stability of slopes are
estimated using the calculated groundwater level,
slope angle measured with a digital elevation model
(DEM) and soil properties. A similar model is
developed by Montgomery and Dietrich (1994). Their
techniques are possible to be used as a real-time
landslide forecast system if an accurate rainfall is
given, but such systems had not been operated.
The National Research Institute for Earth Science
and Disaster Prevention (NIED), Japan, developed an
X-band polarimetric radar (MP-X radar; Fig.3) for
meteorological and hydrological use (Iwanami et al.,
2001). This radar is able to estimate rainfall over
complex terrain using specific differential phase (KDP)
without effects of beam blockage or attenuation.
In this study we developed a realtime forecast
system for shallow landslides using X-band
polarimetric radar. Quantitative precipitation forecast
(QPF) has not been incorporated into this system, but
a real-time forecast of landslides is possible by
making use of the time lag between slope failure and
rainfall peak, even if an observed rainfall is used.
2. REALTIME FORECAST SYSTEM
2.1 Framework
One of the important points to make real-time
forecast of shallow landslides is to get rainfall data as
quickly as possible. The MP-X radar, set up at Ebina,
approximately 50 km southwest of Tokyo, sends KDP
data at 2-tilt PPI scans every minute to the NIED main
office at Tsukuba through the digital leased circuit
(Fig.2). The KDP data are converted to rainfall intensity
automatically and interpolated onto 500m grids in the
observation area (80 km in radius from the radar site).
These data are then used as inputs for a rainfall-runoff
model which calculates water amount in soil every 50
m grid. The slope stability at 50 m grids is estimated
using a simple slope analysis and the results are
displayed on Web pages.
Fig.1 Photograph of a shallow landslide caused by the Niigata-Fukushima heavy rainfall on 13 July 2004. An old woman staying home was killed.
* Corresponding author address: Ryohei Misumi, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba 305-0006, Japan; e-mail: [email protected]
2.2 X-band polarimetric radar
The MP-X radar is a linear orthogonal polarized
radar operating at 9.375 GHz (Fig.3), which is
installed at Ebina in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. Its
observation range is 80 km including mountainous
region to the west and Tokyo metropolitan area to the
northeast (Fig.4). The antenna scanning mode is 2-tilt
PPI at 2.1° and 4.4° in elevation angles with repeating every minute. The data at 4.4° PPI is used to fill the missing data at 2.1 ° mainly in the backside of
mountains.
Rainfall estimation is made using the R-KDP
relationship derived by Park et al. (2005). The merits
to use KDP instead of radar reflectivity are that it is not
affected by rain attenuation, almost immune to beam
blockage and the variation of drop size distribution,
and less sensitive to beam filling (Doviak and Zrnic,
1993). Moreover, X-band radar has high sensitivity to
KDP than S-band or C-band radars, so it is well suited
for rainfall estimation. Actually our previous works
(Park et al., 2005; Maki et al., 2005) showed its
capability to estimate rainfall with high resolution and
high accuracy even over mountains. The use of an X-
band polarimetric radar has great potential for real-
time landslide forecasting.
2.3 Rainfall-runoff model
The rainfall data derived by the R-KDP
relationship are used as inputs for a distributed
rainfall-runoff model which calculates soil water
amount. The formulation of the rainfall-runoff model
used here is based on that of Bell and Moore (1998),
although some simplification has been made. The
model employs a simple soil water accounting
procedure within each 50 m grid square and an
advection routing model based on isochrone.
Specifically, the following linkage function is used to
relate maximum storage capacity, Smax, to the terrain
gradient, g:
max
max
max c)g
g1(S −= (1)
The parameter gmax and cmax are upper limits of
gradient and storage capacity respectively and act as
regional parameters for catchments. A schematic
illustration of water balance of a grid square is given in
Fig.5. Here fr is a correction factor for rainfall R. Part
of the effective rainfall, frR, is assumed to run off from
the storage without getting into soil. Direct runoff is
also produced when the amount of water S exceeds
Fig.3 NIED MP-X radar (X-band polarimetric radar).
MP-X radar
Radar site NIED
R-KDP
conversion
KDP
every
minute R
Rainfall-
runoff model
conversion
Slope stability
analysis
Soil
water
Landslide
anticipated area
Web page
Fig.2 Outline of the shallow landslide forecast system
500m grids
50m grids
80km
Fig.4 Observation range of the MP-X radar.
Tsurumi River basin
the capacity Smax. Evaporation rate, Ea, is related to
the potential evaporation rate, E, as:
E)S
S(E
max
a = (2)
Drainage from the grid storage, which contributes to
the slow catchment response, occurs at the rate:
Skd d= (3)
where kd is the storage constant. The continuity
equation for S is given as:
dERffdt
dSari −−= (4)
In numerical calculation, the above equation is
replaced by a finite difference form:
t)dERff()tt(SS ari* ∆∆ −−+−= (5)
>
≤=
SSifS
SSifS)t(S
*max
**
(6)
where Δt is the time step (360 sec). The water in grid
squares is routed across the catchment using
isochrone pathways. Translation of water between
isochrones is achieved using a discrete kinematic
routing procedure as in Bell and Moore (1998). The
parameters fr, fi, gmax, cmax and kd are estimated by
calibration with the hydrographs at the outlet of the
catchment. The rainfall-runoff model is applied to Tsurumi River basin in Kanagawa Prefecture (Fig.4) with catchment area of 135.9 km2. The catchment is discretized with 50 m grids and soil water amount in grids is calculated every 6 minutes.
2.4 Slope stability analysis
The soil water amount calculated with the rainfall-
runoff model is then used for slope stability analysis.
The method used here is one of the simplest ways in
which each slope is assumed to have an infinite length.
The factor of safety, F, which represents the ratio of
shear strength available to the shear strength required
for stability for an infinite slope with inclination β is
given as (Nash, 1987):
βφ
γγ
ββγ tan
'tan)]
z
h)((1[
cossinz
'cF w−+= (7)
where c' is the cohension of soil, Φ' is the angle of
shearing resistance, γ is the density of soil, γw is the
density of water, z is the soil depth, and h is the level
of ground water from the slip surface. Here the ratio
(h/z) is approximated by the saturation ratio of water
storage :
maxS
S
z
h= (8)
Parameters of soil properties, c', Φ ' and γ are
provided from field test data. When F becomes below
1.0, the grid square is regarded as a landslide
anticipated area.
2.5 Display on Web page
The results of the slope stability analysis are sent
to a data server and automatically displayed on
internet Web pages. Examples of distribution of soil
water amount (Fig.6a) and landslide anticipated area
(Fig.6b) in Tsurumi River basin are shown. At present
this page is displayed as "an open experiment for
shallow landslide forecasting by the NIED".
Fig.5 Illustration of water balance at a grid square.
3. EVALUATION
Because the real-time landslide forecast system
shown in the previous section is just constructed in
2004 and no severe disaster occurred in the
catchment, the evaluation of the system using real-
time data has not been carried out. Instead, the model
is applied to a past event and the performance is
evaluated with simulations. The heavy rainfall in
Tochigi-Fukushima area, Japan, from 26 to 31 August
in 1998 caused more than 1000 landslides in the
upper Abukuma River basin. Several landslides
attacked a welfare facility for handicapped people and
5 lives were lost. The rainfall-runoff model is applied to
the upper Abukuma River basin (Fig.7; the drainage
area is 151.07 km2). There are mountains higher than
1800 m in the west of the catchment and the
difference of the level between the east and the west
is greater than 1500 m.
Because the data of the MP-X radar cannot be
used for this case, we used hourly 5 km-mesh rainfall
data compiled by the Japan Meteorological Agency for
this simulation. The parameters of the rainfall-runoff
model were calibrated with the hydrographs for 3-
month period before the landslide event. Based on a
cone penetration test in the catchment, the depth of
soil (m) is related to the slope gradient as:
43.2tan11.2z +−= β (9)
The values of other soil parameters are given by Kawamoto et al. (2000). The simulation period is from
00 JST (Japan standard time) on 1 August 1998 to
23JST on 2 September. Figure 8 shows the soil water
amount and factor of safety at 9 JST on 27 August
1998 when the heavy rainfall is observed. Soil water is
mainly stored in the east side of the catchment where
rainfall is concentrated. However, unstable slopes with
F < 1 are found mainly in the mountainous regions in
the west side. Variation of the factor of safety around
the welfare facility attacked by landslides (the frame in
Fig.8) is shown in Fig.9. The gray bar in the figure
indicates the building of the facility. The meshes
including actual landslides are indicated with red. At
22 JST on 26 August, 6 hours before the landslides,
the model predicts several meshes as landslide
anticipated areas (blue meshes). At 02 JST on 27
August, 2 hours before the landslide occurrence, most
of the red meshes are covered with the blue ones.
This shows that the model successfully forecast the
landslides 2 hours before the occurrence.
The statistics of the landslide forecast simulation is
shown in Table 1. Among 7388 grids, 5523 grids
(74.8 %) are given correct forecasts. However, it
contains many false alarms; the false alarm ratio
reaches 90 %.
Fig.7 Topography and river network around the upper Abukuma River basin.
Fig.6 Examples of display on the Web page. (a) Distribution of soil water amount and (b) landslide anticipated areas.
(b)
(a)
Table 1 Relationships between the predicted factor of
safety and the occurrence of landslides
Factor of Landslide
safety Occur Not occur
F < 1 205 grids 1809 grids
F > 1 56 grids 5318 grids
4. CONCLUSIONS
A real-time forecast system for shallow landslides,
using 500 m mesh rainfall estimated with an X-band
polarimetric radar every minute, has been developed.
In the system radar-derived rainfall is used as inputs
for rainfall-runoff model with imaginary storages
distributed every 50m grid. Slope stability is calculated
at each grid using amount of water in the storage,
inclination of slopes and the depth and the shear
strength of soils. When the factor of safety of slopes is
below 1, the grid is regarded as landslide anticipated
area. This calculation is repeated every 6 minute and
the results are displayed on Web pages. The lead
time of this forecast is approximately two hours which
corresponds to the time lag between rainfall peak and
slope failure. This period is too short to make warning
for people to evacuate, but useful to understand the
dangerous area at the moment. If a reliable QPF is
available, we can extend the lead time greatly. Before
applying rainfall forecast data, however, we need to
study the allowance of errors in rainfall forecast for
landslide prediction.
Soil water amount (mm)
Factor of safety
Fig.8 Distribution of soil water amount and factor of safety in upper Abukuma catchment at 09 JST on 27 August 1998.
km
Welfare facility
22 JST on 26 AUG
02 JST on 27 AUG
Fig.9 Meshes where landslides occurred in this rainfall event (red) and where landslides are forecast (blue).
REFERENCES
Bell, V. A. and R. J. Moore, 1998: A grid-based
distributed flood forecasting model for use with
weather radar data: Part 1. Formulation.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2, 265-281.
Doviak, R.J. and D. S. Zrnic, 1993: Doppler radar and
weather observation, 2nd Edition. Academic Press
Inc.,562 pp.
Iwanami, K., R. Misumi, M. Maki, T. Wakayama, K.
Hata and S. Watanabe, 2001: Development of
multiparameter radar system on mobile platform.
Preprints 30th Int. Conf. Radar Meteor., Amer.
Meteor. Soc., Munich, Germany, 104-106.
Kawamoto, K., M. Oda and K. Suzuki, 2000: Hydro-
geological study of landslides caused by heavy
rainfall on August 1998 in Fukushima, Japan. J.
Natural Disaster Sci., 22, 13-23.
Maki M., K. Iwanami, R. Misumi, S.-G. Park, H.
Moriwaki, K. Maruyama, I. Watabe, D.-I. Lee, M.
Jang, H.-K. Kim, V. N. Bringi, H. Uyeda, 2005:
Semi-operational rainfall observations with X-band
multi-parameter radar. Atmos. Sci. Letters, 6, 12-
18.
Montgomery, D. R. and W. E. Dietrich, 1994: A
physically based model for topographic control on
shallow landsliding. Water Resource Research, 30,
1153-1171.
Nash, D., 1987: A comparative review of limit
equilibrium methods of stability analysis. Slope
Stability, Editted by M. G. Anderson and K. S.
Richards, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 11-75.
Okimura, T. and R. Ichikawa, 1985: A prediction
method for surface failures by movements of
infiltrated water in surface soil layer. J. Natural
Disaster Sci., 7, 41-51.
Park, S.-G., M. Maki, K. Iwanami, V. N. Bringi and V.
Chandrasekar, 2005: Correction of radar
reflectivity and differential reflectivity for rain
attenuation at X-band. Part II: Evaluation and
application. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. (in press).