5/17/2015 Pre-Proposal Meeting Best Value Model. This presentation is being provided for educational...
-
Upload
betty-obrien -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of 5/17/2015 Pre-Proposal Meeting Best Value Model. This presentation is being provided for educational...
04/18/2304/18/23
Pre-Proposal MeetingPre-Proposal Meeting
Best Value ModelBest Value Model
This presentation is being provided for educational purposes only
Please refer to the RFP for specific instructions
If there are any inconsistencies, the RFP and Amendments shall take precedence over this
presentation
33
Best Value Model
44
Best Value Model
55
PBSRG Research ResultsWorldwide as a leader in Best-Value SystemsWorldwide as a leader in Best-Value Systems
18 Years 1,600+ Projects $4.6 Billion Services & Construction $1.8 Billion Netherlands infrastructure construction
test 5% Increase in Vendor profit 98% On-time, On-Budget, Customer Satisfaction ASU – investments of over $100M due to Best Value GSA (largest organization in U.S. delivering services)
implementation in 2009 Tests also in Africa, Southeast Asia, Canada, & Australia
66
Best Value Objectives• Client outsourcing to experts based on value and
performance
• Minimize risk of non-performance– Vendors optimize project delivery– Complete to the expectations– Customer satisfaction / No complaints
• Minimize the need for client management, direction, and decision making.
• In return, the vendors can maximize profit by being more efficient
77
Best Value Model
88
Best Value Model
What are we trying to accomplish?
Selection Based upon Proponent Expertise:
Ability to understand and plan the project
Identify risks to the project
Mitigate risks to the project
Add value to optimize project delivery
Cost Competitive
Selection Steps
1010
VendorVendor
STEP 1STEP 1RFPRFP
(Risk, Project Plan, Value Added, Cost,
PPI) VendorVendor
STEP 2STEP 2
Interviews
VendorVendor
STEP 3STEP 3
Prioritization
VendorVendor
STEP 4STEP 4
Move forward to Pre Award
Evaluation Weights
100 Points CRITERIA10 Points Price – Fixed Percentage Fee Range45 Points
(15)(15)(15)
Program Capability• Program Plan• Program Risk Assessment• Program Value Added
20 Points Interview• Project Manager
25 Points(12)(13)
Past Performance Information• Construction Management Firm• Project Manager
1111
2 Proponents selected to the Preferred Supplier List
Blind Submittals – Project Capability
Program Risk
Assess.
Program Risk
Assess.
Value Added
Value Added
Program Plan
Program Plan
= identify, prioritize, and minimize risks to the Program Plan (focus on risks that you DO NOT control)
= plan to execute the program (capability to meet requirements)
= value beyond the specifications(think in the best interest of the client)
Allows Vendors to differentiate themselves based upon their ability to identify and minimize risks to the project.
1313
Program Plan• Differentiates capability to meet the requirements of this
project
• Plan to execute and support the program and all projects moving forward. May include (but is not limited to):
– General Program Approach– Staffing and Personnel– Resources that will be committed– How project work will be executed– How you will integrate with University Policies
and Procedures
• No names, two pages, no marketing, part of final contract
1414
Program PlanTemplate
1515
Program Risk Assessment• Identify major project risks
• Focus on Risks that have not yet been minimized before the start of the project (risks that the Vendor does not control)– Explain why the risk is a risk– May cause cost increases, schedule delays, change
orders, or cause dissatisfaction to the client– Should be non-technical– Should be a risk specific to the program
• Identify solution to avoid / minimize the risk• Non-technical explanation• Must explain how risk is avoided or minimized from
occurring• For high score solution should contain performance
information & best value practices
Program Risk Assessment
1616
Template
1717
Program Value AddedValue Added
– Identify value added options “beyond” the standard requirements• Options to adjust the scope or increase the
value of services delivered (expectation, cost, schedule, delivery, owner satisfaction)
– Explain why it is a value add for the University
Program Value Added
1818
Template
• Plan 1 – We will use our 20 years of experience in working with mechanical
systems to minimize the risk of the heating and cooling system design.
• Plan 2– We have identified the design of the heat/cooling system as a risk. It
has not been used before in the area. Will ensure that the system performance and installation is verified in the pre-award period.
– We have bid using best rated mechanical contractor in the area (rated at 9.8 out of 10.0, next best rated 9.1)
– Mechanical contractor identified modifications to the design to improve output and sustainability of the system with the following impacts (mechanical system cost minimized by 15% - see VA#1)
– Mechanical system will be provided by one manufacturer, and will be commissioned by the manufacturer, contractor, and general contractor, who will take full responsibility of commissioning the system
Example of SolutionsExample of SolutionsRisk: Risk: Design of Heating/Cooling SystemDesign of Heating/Cooling SystemType: Project CapabilityType: Project Capability
2020
• Plan 1 – We will work with the user to minimize the impact of noise
from demolition.
• Plan 2– We have planned to demolition during off hours and
weekends. This will have a slight impact on our cost (less than 1%), but the impact to customer satisfaction justifies this.
– We will also install rubber sheets on the floors to diminish noise and vibrations.
– Both solutions can be performed within your budget. – Both solutions have been used on multiple previous projects
w/ high levels of customer satisfaction (9.4/10).
Example of Execution Plan SolutionExample of Execution Plan SolutionPlan: Plan: Noise from DemolitionNoise from DemolitionType: Risk that Contractor does controlType: Risk that Contractor does control
2121
Example of Risk Assessment Solutions Example of Risk Assessment Solutions Risk:Risk: Concrete EscalationType: Risk the Contractor does not control Risk the Contractor does not control
• Risk Solution 1– The owner can be assured all risks associated with
material escalations will be eliminated because we offer the benefit of an experienced project team that includes the most detailed, prequalified and extensive list of subcontractors and suppliers, from around the world.
• Risk Solution 2– The cost of concrete has been rising drastically. Since
this project requires a substantial amount of concrete, cost is a risk. To minimize this risk, we have secured and signed a contract with a local concrete manufacturer to prevent any increase in cost during the duration of this project.
MARKETING INFORMATIONMARKETING INFORMATION
2222
• Risk Solution 1 – Coordination with [water company] is critical. We will
coordinate and plan with [water company] as soon as the award is made to make sure that we get water to the site to irrigate the fields.
• Risk Solution 2– We will coordinate and schedule the water with [water
company]. However, based on past experience there is a high risk they will not meet the schedule (the water company does not meet schedule over 90% of the time).
– We will have temporary waterlines setup and ready to connect to the nearby fire hydrant to irrigate until [water company] is ready.
– We will also have water trucks on-site if there is problems with connecting the lines.
Example of Solutions Example of Solutions Risk: Risk: Getting water to the site (utilities)Getting water to the site (utilities)Type: Risk the Contractor does not control Risk the Contractor does not control
Example of Value Added
2424
Example: Value Added Items
• Reroofing this building will not stop all water leaks. The majority of the leaks are caused by cracks in the parapet walls, broken/missing glass, and poor caulking. For an additional $20K and 3 weeks in schedule we can replace and repair all of these items.
252525
We are Looking for Vendors Who Can Think Ahead…
……And Act In And Act In The Client’s Best The Client’s Best InterestInterest
2626
Things to Avoid• Marketing Information:
– Our company is known worldwide as a leader in online education.
– We will use our long history to make sure the project is a success.
– We will use state-of-the-art process to make it a success.
• Transferring risk back to client:– We will work with the owner to resolve issues– We will have team meetings / partnering meeting with the owner
• General risks and/or general solutions:– We will plan ahead to coordinate activities– We will plan ahead to get classes scheduled and created
• Overly Technical data:– The system we propose has 200% increase in PRX bandwidth
modularity.
Submittal RequirementsSubmittal Document Maximum Page Length
Program Plan Two (2) pages
Program Risk Assessment Two (2) pages
Program Value Added Two (2) pages
2727
• Must NOTNOT contain ANY identifying information (names, company names, project names, product names, etc.)
• Must use the provided template (can submit as many risks as fit within the 2 page limits of each submittal)
Selection Steps
2828
VendorVendor
STEP 1STEP 1
Risk, Project Plan, Value Added,
Cost, PPI VendorVendor
STEP 2STEP 2
Interviews
VendorVendor
STEP 3STEP 3
Prioritization
VendorVendor
STEP 4STEP 4
Move forward to Pre Award
2929
Past Performance Information (PPI)
• PPI collected on all Proponents and their critical team components.
• Once the PPI is collected, it is stored in a database.
• Project Close Out ratings from Client as part of PSL program – updates PPI for future work
Critical ComponentsPast Performance Information will be collected
on:
Construction Management Firm – 7 References Maximum
Project Manager – 5 References Maximum
3030
PPI– Similar CM projects during last three (3) years
• 9/1/2009 to 8/31/2012
– Past projects of $5M or less per project
– Firms/ individuals who have completed a project at UA must identify the most recent CM project completed during the last 3 years
– May provide more than one project that was completed at UA
– UA references must be authorized via Pat Jansen or Hugh Warren
3131
3232
PPI Process
• The Proponent is responsible for sending out a survey questionnaire to each of their past clients.
• The survey must be faxed/emailed back to the Proponent
• The Proponent will submit all surveys to the Owner with their submittal.
Setup and send Survey Forms
Past Client Evaluates and Returns
VendorVendorPast ClientPast ClientVendorVendorProponentProponent
3333
Past Performance Information3 Parts:
– Survey Questionnaire– Reference List– PPI Score
• Survey Scores are 1-10 and used in Evaluation Criteria
• Firm (as the Proponent) and the Project Manager must have separate reference lists.
3434
Survey Form
3535
Don’t Forget to Add Your Email and verify signature
Don’t forget to have the evaluator sign the form
Fax or Email
3636
Example Survey (Firm and Individuals)
VendorPast Client
VendorPast Client
373737
• Firm (as the Proponent) and the Project Manager will create a “Reference List” (which identifies all projects being surveyed)
PPI Reference ListNO
PAST CLIENT NAME
PERSON COMPLETING THE SURVEY
PHONE NUMBER
EMAILPROJECT INFO
Final Cost of Project(Including CM Fees &
GST)
Month, Date, Year
Completed
1 ABC University Joe Smith 602-488-6129 [email protected] Classroom Renovation
$850,00 Jan 31, 2010
2 Tempe College Todd Sayles 602-897-1122 [email protected] Lab Fume Hoods
$1,250,000 Dec 12, 2011
3 Biltmore Plaze Judy Smith 555-555-5646 [email protected] SMART Classroom
$740,000 Mar 13, 2011
4567
1 ABC University Joe Smith 602-488-6129 [email protected] Classroom Renovation
$850,00 Jan 31, 2010
2 Tempe College Todd Sayles 602-897-1122 [email protected] Lab Fume Hoods
$1,250,000 Dec 12, 2011
3 Biltmore Plaze Judy Smith 555-555-5646 [email protected] SMART Classroom
$740,000 Mar 13, 2011
3838
Survey Must Match Reference List
SMART Classroom
3/15/2011
3939
References• The reference list must contain different projects
• You may submit multiple jobs for the same past client
Enter Survey Scores
4040
414141
PPI Summary• PPI is a one time step. The vendor and individual do
not need to repeat on every project.
• The vendor and individual must create a “Reference List” and prepare and send out survey forms.
• The vendor should pick their own references
• The vendor should collect all surveys
• Close out ratings from completed projects within the CM program will be used to update PPI scores going forward
424242
Pricing
RFP
434343
How The Submittal Process Works
Submittal
Evaluation Members
Proposal Form(1 page)
Proposal Form, $, & Other Documentation
Proposal Form(1 page)
Plans
Total Score
ContractingOfficer
ContractingOfficer
Selection Steps
4444
VendorVendor
STEP 1STEP 1
Risk Assessment, PC, Value Add,
Cost, PPI VendorVendor
STEP 2STEP 2
Interviews
VendorVendor
STEP 3STEP 3
Prioritization
VendorVendor
STEP 4STEP 4
Move forward to Pre Award
Shortlisting
• If necessary short listing will be conducted prior to interviews (depending on the number of vendors)
4646
Interview Format• The client will actually “interview” each critical individual. This is not a
“presentation”
• All individuals will be interviewed separately. The client will not allow group interviews with the vendors team. The client will not allow any other individuals to be present during interviews
• A standard set of questions will be generated and asked to each individual.
• Generally, interview times will last about 15-30 minutes per individual
• The client has the option to clarify any answers (or ask additional questions to clarify an answer).
• No substitutions will be allowed. Individuals listed on Proposal Form must be present. If a team member is not present for the interview, they will jeopardize the teams competitiveness.
Primary Questions1. Why were you selected for this project?
2. How many similar projects have you worked on? Individually and as a Team?
3. Describe a similar project you have developed/worked on to the current project.
4. What is different about this project from other projects that you have worked for?
5. Draw out the process for this project by major milestone activities.1. Identify, prioritize, and how you will minimize the risks of this project.2. What risks don’t you control? How will you minimize those risks?3. What do you need from the client and when do you need it?
6. How are you going to measure your performance during the project?
7. What value do you bring to the project in terms of differences based on dollars, quality, expertise, or time?
Selection Steps
4848
VendorVendor
STEP 1STEP 1
Risk Assessment, Value Add, Cost,
PPI, Schedule VendorVendor
STEP 2STEP 2
Interviews
VendorVendor
STEP 3STEP 3
Prioritization
VendorVendor
STEP 4STEP 4
Move forward to Pre Award
Simple Excel Analysis
4949
Vendor A Vendor B Vendor C Vendor A Vendor B Vendor C1 Proposal Cost 250 57,000$ 65,000$ 55,000$ 241 212 2502 Interview Rating 350 8.5 5.1 5.1 350 210 2103 NTR Rating 150 9.5 6.5 5.1 150 103 814 TC Rating 100 9.1 9.5 9.9 92 96 1005 VA Rating 100 5.0 8.5 5.0 59 100 596 PPI Rating 50 9.8 9.8 9.9 49 49 50
941 770 749
RAW DATA FINAL POINTSCRITERIA WEIGHTSNO
Selection Steps
5050
VendorVendor
STEP 1STEP 1
Risk Assessment, Value Add, Cost,
PPI, Schedule VendorVendor
STEP 2STEP 2
Interviews
VendorVendor
STEP 3STEP 3
Prioritization
VendorVendor
STEP 4STEP 4
Move forward to Pre Award
Evaluation Weights
100 Points CRITERIA10 Points Price – Fixed Percentage Fee Range45 Points
(15)(15)(15)
Program Capability• Program Plan• Program Risk Assessment• Program Value Added
20 Points Interview• Project Manager
25 Points(12)(13)
Past Performance Information• Construction Management Firm• Project Manager
5151
2 Proponents selected to the Preferred Supplier List
Selection Summary
100 Points CRITERIA70 Points Fixed Percentage Fee – competitive bid20 Points
(15)(05)
Specific Project Capability• Project Risk Assessment• Project Value Added
10 Points Past Performance Information – closeout rating from previous UA CM based on projects awarded for this program)
5252
Project Evaluation Criteria
5353
Best Value Model
Not Detailed Detailed
545454
Pre Award PeriodWhat is it / Why is it important?
• Period of time allotted to potential best value vendor (aka the Expert) to:– Present their project plan / clarify that your proposal is accurate
– Identify the risks and issues that could cause the plan to deviate• Identify what you don’t know and when you will know it and how
the plan could change based upon what you discover• Set plans to minimize those risks from occurring• Address all the concerns and risks of the client
– Identify what you need from the client and have a plan for getting it
– Have completely aligned expectations between all parties so everyone knows what is going to transpire and what they are supposed to do
– Coordinate the schedule
Pre Award / Clarification Period
5555
5656
Pre Award Deliverables1. Scope
• Clear and Detailed Project Scope (what is and what is not included) – Set Baseline Expectation
2. Uncontrolled Risks List • A list of Risks Vendor does not control with plans to
minimize3. Identified Technical Risks List
• A list of all project risks with plans to minimize4. Milestone schedule5. Client Action Item List6. Weekly Risk Report 7. Performance Metrics8. Fee9. Other: Agreed to Value Adding Options, Original Risk
submittals, Interview Minutes, etc.
575757
Pre Award Summary Meeting• Is not a “Q&A” meeting
– All issues resolved– All coordination complete– All risks that are not in vendors control have been
identified – All value added options have been addressed
• PA Meeting is to summarize all of the coordination that has been complete and walk through the PA Document
• Upon successful completion of the PA Meeting, the client will make the award
5858
Best Value Model
5959
Weekly Risk Report• Excel Spreadsheet that tracks unforeseen risks that impact the
project
• Client will setup and send to vendor once Award/NTP issued. PBSRG will provide additional training.
• The final project rating will be impacted by the accuracy and timely submittal of the WRR
6060
Unforeseen Risks
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY• Vendor Performance• Client Performance• Individual Performance• Project Performance
RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN• Risk• Risk Minimization• Schedule
WEEKLY REPORT• Unforeseen Risks• Risk
METRICS• Time linked• Financial• Operational/Client Satisfac.• Environmental
Measurement of Deviation from the ExpectationMeasurement of Deviation from the ExpectationManagement by Risk MinimizationManagement by Risk Minimization
Post Project Rating
Update PPI
Filter 1
PastPerformanc
eInformation
Filter 2
Capability
Filter 4
Prioritize (Identify
Best Value)
Filter 5
Pre-AwardPeriod
QU
ALI
TY O
F PR
OPO
SER
S
Filter 3
Interview
AW
AR
D
High
Low
Blind Rating
Project Capability
Risk
Value Added
Financials
PA DocsWRRRMP
Technical Documents
CriteriaPPI
InterviewProject
CapabilityRisk
Value AddedFinancials
DominanceCheck
Ratings are dominant
Best value is within high
and low cost ranges
BV contractor has dominant information
Procurement Schedule
6262
Pre-Proposal Information Session 8/29/2012
Last Date for Questions 9/7/2012
RFP Closing Date 9/12/2012
Interviews for Short Listed (tentative) 9/25/2012
Selection of 2 Suppliers 9/26/2012
Pre Award Phase 9/26/2012
Effective Date for PSL 9/27/2012 to 10/3/2012