5/1/2007 ITS Lab

24
Comparison before and after SWARM activation on OR-217 Comparison before and after SWARM activation on OR-217 in November 2005, and with results from June 2006 in November 2005, and with results from June 2006 pilot study of SWARM on OR-217. pilot study of SWARM on OR-217. Using Archived Data to Measure Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System- Operational Benefits of a System- wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System System Analysis of Archived 2005 Data for Analysis of Archived 2005 Data for OR-217 SB OR-217 SB 5/1/2007 5/1/2007 ITS Lab ITS Lab

description

Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Analysis of Archived 2005 Data for OR-217 SB. Comparison before and after SWARM activation on OR-217 in November 2005, and with results from June 2006 pilot study of SWARM on OR-217. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Page 1: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Comparison before and after SWARM activation on OR-217 in Comparison before and after SWARM activation on OR-217 in November 2005, and with results from June 2006 pilot study of November 2005, and with results from June 2006 pilot study of SWARM on OR-217.SWARM on OR-217.

Using Archived Data to Measure Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Operational Benefits of a System-wide

Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) SystemSystem

Analysis of Archived 2005 Data for OR-217 Analysis of Archived 2005 Data for OR-217 SBSB

5/1/20075/1/2007

ITS LabITS Lab

Page 2: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

ObjectivesObjectives Validate OR-217S SWARM pilot study results using Validate OR-217S SWARM pilot study results using

2005 archival data before and after SWARM 2005 archival data before and after SWARM implementation.implementation. Process 2005 archival data for OR-217SProcess 2005 archival data for OR-217S Loop detector, incident and weather data from PORTAL ArchiveLoop detector, incident and weather data from PORTAL Archive Reprocess 2006 pilot data to ensure comparable results.Reprocess 2006 pilot data to ensure comparable results.

Incorporate TAC suggestions for data presentationIncorporate TAC suggestions for data presentation Ramps and mainlineRamps and mainline

Ramp volume vs. mainline speed/flowRamp volume vs. mainline speed/flow VHT: Stacked bar comparing mainline and rampVHT: Stacked bar comparing mainline and ramp Travel TimeTravel Time Break out performance measures by mainline and rampBreak out performance measures by mainline and ramp

Other Other Data QualityData Quality

Page 3: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Study PeriodsStudy Periods

Pilot Study in June, 2006Pilot Study in June, 2006 1 week each pre-timed and SWARM1 week each pre-timed and SWARM Pre-Timed: 6/19 – 6/23/06Pre-Timed: 6/19 – 6/23/06

Wed 6/21 excludedWed 6/21 excluded SWARM: 6/26 – 6/30/06SWARM: 6/26 – 6/30/06

Fri 6/30 excludedFri 6/30 excluded

Study of 2005 archive dataStudy of 2005 archive data Before and after SWARM activation on 11/3/2005Before and after SWARM activation on 11/3/2005 Pre-SWARM: 10/10 – 10/21/05 (2 weeks)Pre-SWARM: 10/10 – 10/21/05 (2 weeks)

10/24 – 10/28 (e.g. comm loss ~ 10% on 10/24 & 10/28 @ 7210/24 – 10/28 (e.g. comm loss ~ 10% on 10/24 & 10/28 @ 72ndnd)) Post-SWARM: 11/7 – 11/17/05 (2 weeks)Post-SWARM: 11/7 – 11/17/05 (2 weeks)

11/7 – 1 hour comm loss – 10% missing timestamps11/7 – 1 hour comm loss – 10% missing timestamps Used 11/14 dataUsed 11/14 data

11/21 – 11/25: Thanksgiving11/21 – 11/25: Thanksgiving

Page 4: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

LimitationsLimitations

Potential sources of variationPotential sources of variation IncidentsIncidents

Depends on accuracy of Portal archived incident dataDepends on accuracy of Portal archived incident data ClimateClimate Seasonal driving patterns (e.g. school)Seasonal driving patterns (e.g. school)

Missing data points interpolated within each day.Missing data points interpolated within each day. Greater communications failures than in pilot studyGreater communications failures than in pilot study Time period selected to avoid most significant issuesTime period selected to avoid most significant issues

Multi-week study period provides additional dataMulti-week study period provides additional data Can replace one “bad” day with a comparable dayCan replace one “bad” day with a comparable day

Page 5: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Communications Failures - Communications Failures - 20052005

Communications Failures and Missing Timestamps by RampPre-SWARM 10/ 10 to 10/ 21/ 05 and Post-SWARM 11/ 7 to 11/ 18/ 05

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

Barnes

Wils

hire

Walk

er

Bhhw

yAllen

Denne

yHall

Scho

lls

Green

burg

99W

72nd

On-ramps on ORE 217 southbound

% C

om

munic

ation F

ailure

s

PreSWARM

PostSWARM

Communications Failures and Missing TimestampsPre-SWARM 10/10 to 10/21/05 and Post-SWARM 11/7 to 11/18/05

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

10-10 10-11 10-12 10-13 10-14 10-17 10-18 10-19 10-20 10-21 11-7 11-8 11-9 11-10 11-11 11-14 11-15 11-16 11-17 11-18

Dates

% C

om

mu

nic

atio

n F

ailu

res

Q1

Min

Median

Max

Q3

Pre-SWARM Post-SWARM72nd

Walker

Walker

Bottom chart Bottom chart shows problems shows problems at isolated ramps at isolated ramps on three days on three days pre-SWARM.pre-SWARM.

Higher Higher percentage of percentage of failures in failures in general and general and system-wide on system-wide on three particular three particular days post-days post-SWARM. SWARM.

Page 6: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Communications Failures - Communications Failures - 20062006

Communications Failures and Missing Timestamps by DatePre-Timed 6/19 to 6/23/06 and SWARM 6/26 to 6/30/06

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0%

6-19 6-20 6-21 6-22 6-23 6-26 6-27 6-28 6-29 6-30

Dates

% C

om

mu

nic

atio

n F

ailu

res

Q1

Min

Median

Max

Q3

Pre-Timed SWARM

Greenburg

Note: 72nd Excluded (Avg 65.1% Pre-Timed, 69.2% SWARM)

Walker, BH Hwy

7272ndnd Ave Ave excluded from excluded from bottom chartbottom chart

Capacity Capacity issues should issues should now be now be addressedaddressed Data network Data network

upgrade in late upgrade in late 2006.2006.

Communications Failures and Missing Timestamps by RampPre-Timed 6/ 19 to 6/ 23/ 06 and SWARM 6/ 26 to 6/ 30/ 06

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

On-ramps on ORE 217 southbound

% C

om

munic

ation F

ailure

s

Pre-Timed Avg

SWARM Avg

72nd: 65.1% Pre-Timed, 69.2% SWARM

Page 7: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Incidents - 2005Incidents - 2005 Highlighted incidents fall within weeks selected for study. Criteria?

Number of lanes affected, duration (>30 minutes) 10/11 @ Canyon

Incident ID Date Start Time End Time Duration Location#

Lanes Comment

482303 2005-09-16 08:18:37 09:03:32 00:44:55 HWY 26 1 Comm Loss

483300 2005-09-19 07:54:48 07:55:36 00:00:48 Just North Of 72ND 0  

489082 2005-10-01 08:53:06 09:14:33 00:21:27 HWY 26 0 Weekend

489682 2005-10-03 08:23:44 08:37:10 00:13:26 Near ALLEN 0  

491300 2005-10-06 07:49:42 08:02:00 00:12:18 Just South Of DENNEY 1  

491360 2005-10-06 08:50:00 08:56:55 00:06:55 At SCHOLLS 0  

493205 2005-10-11 08:38:06 09:09:01 00:30:55 At CANYON 1  

496800 2005-10-20 07:21:10 07:27:31 00:06:21 SCHOLLS 1  

499962 2005-10-28 09:20:03 09:22:36 00:02:33 ALLEN 1 Comm Loss

499964 2005-10-28 09:32:38 09:33:16 00:00:38 SCHOLLS 1 Comm Loss

502920 2005-11-03 07:11:44 07:51:35 00:39:51 ALLEN 1  

503004 2005-11-03 09:17:10 09:17:20 00:00:10 CANYON 1  

506322 2005-11-10 06:46:41 06:48:38 00:01:57 At ALLEN 1  

511003 2005-11-22 08:30:44 09:00:08 00:29:24 At CANYON RD 1 Thanksgiving

511481 2005-11-23 09:54:54 10:18:24 00:23:30 Just North Of CANYON RD 1 Thanksgiving

513260 2005-11-29 05:39:54 07:04:26 01:24:32 Just South Of GREENBURG ROAD 2  

513863 2005-11-30 07:56:27 08:39:13 00:42:46 At HWY 99W 0  

515762 2005-12-05 06:52:35 07:27:29 00:34:54 Just South Of 72ND 1  

Page 8: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

WeatherWeatherOct 2005 Pre-SWARM Nov 2005 Post-SWARM

Page 9: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Incidents, Weather, Incidents, Weather, CommunicationsCommunications

October 10

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

11

Incident 0:30 @ Canyon (1 Ln)

12 13

Rain 5-7,8-9am (.04")

14 15 16

17 18 19

Rain 7-8am (.01")

20

Incident 0:06 @ Scholl’s (1 Ln)Rain 6-9am (.07")

21 22 23

24

Comm Loss

25 26 27 28

Comm Loss

29 30

31 November 1 2 3

SWARM Activated

4 5 6

7

Rain 5-7am (.03")High Comm Loss, Replaced with 11/14

8

Rain 9-10am (.01")

9 10

Incident 0:02@ Allen (1 Lane)

11

Rain 7-8am (.01")

12 13

14 15 16 17

High Comm Loss – Replaced with 11/10

18

High Comm Loss – Replaced with 11/11

19 20

10/10/2005 - 11/17/2005

Pre

-Tim

ed S

tud

yS

WA

RM

Stu

dy

Page 10: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

AdjustmentsAdjustments

Adjusted for incidents, communication loss Adjusted for incidents, communication loss where most significant. where most significant. Pre-TimedPre-Timed

Did not adjust:Did not adjust: 10/11 Walker (Incident)10/11 Walker (Incident) 10/12 7210/12 72ndnd (Comm Loss) (Comm Loss) 10/20-21 Walker (Comm Loss)10/20-21 Walker (Comm Loss)

SWARMSWARM Replaced data for all ramps:Replaced data for all ramps:

Mon 11/7 with Mon 11/14Mon 11/7 with Mon 11/14 Thu 11/17 with Thu 11/10Thu 11/17 with Thu 11/10 Fri 11/18 with Fri 11/11Fri 11/18 with Fri 11/11

Did not adjust ramp inflow calculations, chartsDid not adjust ramp inflow calculations, charts Also interpolated for missing data pointsAlso interpolated for missing data points

Page 11: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Performance Measures (6-9/10 Performance Measures (6-9/10 AM)AM) 2006 original analysis was 6-9 am.

2006 data reprocessed to ensure comparable time range and methods. 2005 data

Pre-Timed VHT, DelayPre-Timed VHT, Delay

VMTVHT

(Avg Daily)Travel-Time

Avg Delay (veh-hours)

Rainy Days Incident

Days Excluded

Pre-Timed 65,871 1,337 8.8 210 0 Wed 6/23SWARM 66,426 1,416 9.2 283 Fri 6/30

% Change 0.80% 6.00% 5.10% 34.70%

Pre-Timed 83924 1649 222 0 Wed 6/23SWARM 84961 1764 315 Fri 6/30

% Change 1.24% 6.92% 42.28%

Pre-Timed 73284 2116 711 3 Pre None

SWARM 77543 1688 368 2 Post

% Change 5.81% -20.26% -48.18%

June 2006 Pilot (6-9 am)(Original Analysis)

Pre/Post Activation (6-10 am)2 Weeks Oct-Nov 2005

June 2006 Pilot (6-10 am)(Reprocessed)

Exclusions of incidents could account for shift in numbers Wednesdays typically bigger travel days than Fridays Numbers for 2006 data without exclusion of Wed 6/23 and Fri 6/30Pre-Timed 85144 1838 423 0 None

SWARM 85453 1732 294

% Change 0.36% -5.78% -30.47%

June 2006 Pilot (6-10 am)Including Incident Days(Reprocessed)

Page 12: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

VMTVMT

Total VMT per Day 6-10 am1 Week Pre-Timed between 6/19/06 to 6/23/061 Week SWARM between 6/26/06 to 6/30/06

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average

VM

T

Pre-Timed

SWARM

2005 Pre/Post SWARM June 2006 Pilot

VMT increased by 5.6% from the two weeks studied before VMT increased by 5.6% from the two weeks studied before SWARM activation and after.SWARM activation and after. 3.6% between four week periods before and after activation3.6% between four week periods before and after activation Possible over-estimation due to communication errors and Possible over-estimation due to communication errors and

interpolation.interpolation.

Average Total VMT 6-10 am2 Weeks Pre-SWARM between 10/10 to 10/21/052 Weeks Post-SWARM between 11/7 to 11/18/05

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average

VM

T

PreSWARM

PostSWARM

Page 13: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

VHTVHT

6/06 Pre-timed and SWARM

Higher VHT in 2005 period, especially Tue – ThuHigher VHT in 2005 period, especially Tue – Thu In 2005, VHT lower pre-SWARM than post-SWARMIn 2005, VHT lower pre-SWARM than post-SWARM

Versus 2006 pilot study where VHT was lower pre-timed than SWARMVersus 2006 pilot study where VHT was lower pre-timed than SWARM

2005 Pre/Post SWARMTotal VHT per Day 6-10 am

1 Week Pre-Timed between 6/19/06 to 6/23/061 Week SWARM between 6/26/06 to 6/30/06

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average

VH

T

Pre-Timed

SWARM

Average Total VHT by Day, 6-10 am2 Weeks Pre-SWARM between 10/10 to 10/21/052 Weeks Post-SWARM between 11/7 to 11/18/05

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average

VH

T

PreSWARM Totals

PostSWARM Totals

Page 14: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

OscillationsOscillations

6/06 Pre-timed and SWARM2005 Pre/Post SWARMOscillations 6-10 am

1 Week Pre-Timed between 6/19/06 to 6/23/061 Week SWARM between 6/26/06 to 6/30/06

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Milepost on ORE 217 Southbound

RM

SE

(ve

hic

les)

Pre-timed

SWARM

Oscillations 6-10 am2 Weeks Pre-SWARM between 10/10 to 10/21/05

2 Weeks Post-SWARM between 11/7/05 to 11/18/05

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Milepost on ORE 217 Southbound

RM

SE

(ve

hic

les)

PreSWARM Avg

SWARM Avg

Page 15: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Ramp Flow Ramp Flow – by on-ramp– by on-ramp

On-ramp Flow 6:30 - 8:30 am1 Week Pre-Timed betw een 6/19/06 to 6/23/061 Week SWARM betw een 6/26/06 to 6/30/06

0100200300400500600700800900

1000

Barnes Wilshire Walker B-H Hw y Allen Denney Hall Scholls-Ferry

On-ramp

On

-ram

p f

low

(vp

h)

Pre-timed

SWARM

June 2006 Pilot

2005 Pre/Post SWARM

Flow at each ramp Flow at each ramp roughly comparable roughly comparable between 2005 and between 2005 and 2006. 2006. 2005: slight decrease 2005: slight decrease

under SWARM under SWARM 2006: slight increase 2006: slight increase

under SWARMunder SWARM Note: 2006 chart does Note: 2006 chart does

not include not include Greenburg, 99W, and Greenburg, 99W, and 7272ndnd

On-ramp Flow 6:30 - 8:30 am2 Weeks Pre-SWARM betw een 10/10 to 10/21/052 Weeks Post-SWARM betw een 11/7 to 11/18/05

0100200300400500

600700800900

1000

On-ramp

On

-ram

p f

low

(vp

h)

Pre-timed

SWARM

Page 16: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Ramp Volume - ObliqueRamp Volume - Oblique

Oblique N(x,t) of On-ramp Inflows 6:30 - 8:30 am1 Week Pre-Timed between 6/19/06 to 6/23/06

1 Week SWARM between 6/26/06 to 6/30/06

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

6:30 6:40 6:50 7:00 7:10 7:20 7:30 7:40 7:50 8:00 8:10 8:20 8:30

Time

N -

q0*(

t-t 0

), q

0=

3600

vp

h

Pre-timed

SWARM

June 2006 Pilot2005 Pre/Post SWARM

Higher on-ramp inflows during 2005 pre-SWARM period than 2005 post-SWARM or Higher on-ramp inflows during 2005 pre-SWARM period than 2005 post-SWARM or 2006 pilot2006 pilot Change in behavior? Change in behavior? Do specific ramps account for the increase?Do specific ramps account for the increase? Implies that in 2005, SWARM was more restrictive than pre-timed from 7:30 to 8:30 amImplies that in 2005, SWARM was more restrictive than pre-timed from 7:30 to 8:30 am

Under SWARM ramp inflows roughly comparable between 2005 and 2006Under SWARM ramp inflows roughly comparable between 2005 and 2006 Slightly higher during June 2006 pilot Slightly higher during June 2006 pilot

Note: Greenburg, 72Note: Greenburg, 72ndnd, and 99W are not included in 2005 chart, , and 99W are not included in 2005 chart, since they were not included in the 2006 pilot study.since they were not included in the 2006 pilot study.

Oblique N(x,t) of On Ramp Vehicle Inflows2 Weeks Pre-SWARM betw een 10/10 to 10/21/052 Weeks Post-SWARM betw een 11/7 to 11/18/05

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

6:30 6:40 6:50 7:00 7:10 7:20 7:30 7:40 7:50 8:00 8:10 8:20 8:30

Time

N -

q0*

(t-t

0),

q0=

3600

vp

h

Pre-timed

SWARM

Page 17: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Reduced metering window under SWARMReduced metering window under SWARM Work in progress – show mainlineWork in progress – show mainline

Ramp Inflows 6/19 - 6/23 Pre-Timed

0

5

10

15

20

25

Time

Vo

lum

e

6/19/06

6/20/06

6/21/06

6/22/06

6/23/06

Ramp Inflows 6/26 - 6/30 SWARM

0

5

10

15

20

25

Time

Vo

lum

e

6/26/06

6/27/06

6/28/06

6/29/06

6/30/06

Ramp Inflows 6/19 - 6/23 Pre-TimedScholl's

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Time

Vo

lum

e

6/19/06

6/20/06

6/21/06

6/22/06

6/23/06

Ramp Inflows 6/26 - 6/30 SWARMScholl's

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Time

Vo

lum

e

6/26/06

6/27/06

6/28/06

6/29/06

6/30/06

Metering Activation by Ramp, Metering Activation by Ramp, 20062006

June 2006 Pilot: BH Hwy June 2006 Pilot: Scholl’s Ferry

Page 18: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Delay – by rampDelay – by ramp

6/06 Pre-timed and SWARM

High pre-SWARM delay for many ramps in 2005High pre-SWARM delay for many ramps in 2005 Particularly BH Hwy, Scholl’s, and GreenburgParticularly BH Hwy, Scholl’s, and Greenburg Based on 2005 data, SWARM reduced delay at many rampsBased on 2005 data, SWARM reduced delay at many ramps

But contradicts 2006 pilot studyBut contradicts 2006 pilot study

2005 Pre/Post SWARMAverage AM Peak Delay by Ramp (6-10 am)

1 Week Pre-Timed between 6/19 to 6/23/061 Week SWARM between 6/26 to 6/30/06

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Del

ay (

Veh

icle

-Ho

urs

)

PreSWARM Avg

SWARM Avg

Average Daily Delay by Ramp (6-10 am) 2 Weeks Pre-SWARM between 10/10/05 to 10/21/052 Weeks Post-SWARM between 11/7/05 to 11/18/05

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Barnes

Wils

hire

Walke

r

Bhhwy

Allen

Denney Hall

Scholls

Green

burg

99W

72nd

Del

ay (

Veh

icle

-Ho

urs

)

PreSWARM Avg

SWARM Avg

Page 19: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Delay – by day of weekDelay – by day of week

2005 Pre/Post SWARM

High pre-SWARM delay for many ramps in 2005High pre-SWARM delay for many ramps in 2005 Tue, Wed, Thu > Mon > FriTue, Wed, Thu > Mon > Fri

6/06 Pre-timed and SWARM

Average AM Peak Delay by Day of Week (6-10 am)1 Week Pre-Timed between 6/19 to 6/23/061 Week SWARM between 6/26 to 6/30/06

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average

Del

ay (

Veh

icle

-Ho

urs

)

Pre-Timed Daily Total

SWARM Daily Total

Average AM Peak Delay by Day of Week (6-10 am)2 Weeks Pre-SWARM between 10/10/05 to 10/21/052 Weeks Post-SWARM between 11/7/05 to 11/18/05

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average

Del

ay (

Veh

icle

-Ho

urs

)

PreSWARM Totals

PostSWARM Totals

Page 20: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Delay – 2005Delay – 2005By Ramp and Day of WeekBy Ramp and Day of Week

Combined presentation of previous two slidesCombined presentation of previous two slides Focus on BH Hwy, Scholl’s, and GreenburgFocus on BH Hwy, Scholl’s, and Greenburg

Pre-SWARM Average AM Peak Delay by Ramp and Day of Week (6-10 am)

2 Weeks Pre-SWARM between 10/10 to 10/21/05

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

Del

ay (

Veh

icle

-Ho

urs

)

72nd

99W

Greenburg

Scholls

Hall

Denney

Allen

Bhhwy

Walker

Wilshire

Barnes

Post-SWARM Average AM Peak Delay by Ramp and Day of Week (6-10 am)

2 Weeks Post-SWARM between 11/7 to 11/18/05

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

Del

ay (

Veh

icle

-Ho

urs

)

72nd

99W

Greenburg

Scholls

Hall

Denney

Allen

Bhhwy

Walker

Wilshire

Barnes

Page 21: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

On-Ramp Travel TimesOn-Ramp Travel Times Not in scope of analysis of 2005 dataNot in scope of analysis of 2005 data Travel times for BH Hwy and Scholls Ferry on-ramps Travel times for BH Hwy and Scholls Ferry on-ramps

SWARM, June 2006, 23% lower at BH Hwy and 37% lower at Scholl’s SWARM, June 2006, 23% lower at BH Hwy and 37% lower at Scholl’s FerryFerry

5 minute samples from video, 6-19-06 to 6-29-065 minute samples from video, 6-19-06 to 6-29-06

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

6:30 6:40 6:50 7:00 7:10 7:20 7:30 7:40 7:50 8:00 8:10 8:20 8:30

Time

Tra

vel

Tim

e (s

ec)

Pre-timed

SWARM

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

6:30 6:40 6:50 7:00 7:10 7:20 7:30 7:40 7:50 8:00 8:10 8:20 8:30

Time

Tra

vel

Tim

e (s

ec)

Pre-timed

SWARM

FIGURE 9(a) Travel time on the Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway on-ramp. FIGURE 9(b) Travel time on the Scholls-Ferry Rd. on-ramp.

Pre-Timed SWARMmin 0:00:20 0:00:09median 0:01:10 0:00:49max 0:01:41 0:03:59

Pre-Timed SWARMmin 0:00:23 0:00:15median 0:00:31 0:00:21max 0:01:21 0:45:22

June 2006 Pilot: BH Hwy June 2006 Pilot: Scholl’s Ferry

Page 22: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Summary of FindingsSummary of Findings

Increase in pre-timed VHT, Delay in Increase in pre-timed VHT, Delay in 2005 vs. 2006 pilot study2005 vs. 2006 pilot study ??????

Additional weeks allowed bad data to Additional weeks allowed bad data to be replacedbe replaced Some effect but not a major changeSome effect but not a major change

Page 23: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Work in ProgressWork in Progress

TAC Suggestions – Plan to incorporate TAC Suggestions – Plan to incorporate as many as possible by next meetingas many as possible by next meeting On ramp volume vs. mainline speed and On ramp volume vs. mainline speed and

flowflow Comparison of travel time change on Comparison of travel time change on

mainline and rampmainline and ramp Comparison of VHT on ramp and mainlineComparison of VHT on ramp and mainline Delay by timeDelay by time Break up performance measures by ramp Break up performance measures by ramp

and mainlineand mainline

Page 24: 5/1/2007 ITS Lab

Mainline Speed and Ramp Mainline Speed and Ramp Volume Volume

Ramp Inflows and Mainline Speed at Scholl'sJune '06: 6/19-23 Pre-Timed and 6/26-30 SWARM

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

6:00

6:15

6:30

6:45

7:00

7:15

7:30

7:45

8:00

8:15

8:30

8:45

9:00

9:15

9:30

9:45

10:00

Time

Vo

lum

e

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Sp

eed

Fwy Inflows Pre-Timed

Fwy Inflows SWARM

Speed Pre-Timed

Speed SWARM

Ramp Inflows and Mainline Speed at BH HwyJune '06: 6/19-23 Pre-Timed and 6/26-30 SWARM

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

6:00

6:15

6:30

6:45

7:00

7:15

7:30

7:45

8:00

8:15

8:30

8:45

9:00

9:15

9:30

9:45

Time

Vo

lum

e

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Sp

eed

Fwy Inflows Pre-Timed

Fwy Inflows SWARM

Speed Pre-Timed

Speed SWARM