50 Solid Reasons Why Believers Should Reject the Doctrine ...ponderscripture.org/Word Docs/In Search...

In Search of theTrue Sabbath

21 Concise Answers toLunar Sabbatarian Teachings

by W. Glenn Moore

This article can be downloaded in PDF format at no cost from our website at:

http://www.ponderscripture.org/lunarsabb.html

My Address:

“Glenn Moore” <[email protected]>

Glenn MoorePO Box 77889

Fort Worth, Texas 76177

http://www.ponderscripture.org/lunarsabb.html

In Search of the True Sabbath21 Concise Answers to Lunar Sabbatarian Teachings

by W. Glenn Moore

There is a new doctrine going around which states that the seventh-day Sabbath commonly recognized by normative Judaism and some Christian groups is pagan, and that even the continuously-repeating weekly cycle is of pagan origin. The true, seventh-day Sabbath (they claim) is based upon the lunar cycle. They are known as “lunar sabbaths,” and those who observe them are called “lunar sabbatarians.” They believe the weekly Sabbath is determined by the new moon. The day of the new moon, which lunar sabbatarians do not consider to be a day of the week, is a day of “no regular work.” The first day of the week for lunar sabbatarians, then, is the second day of the month. The first sabbath of the month always falls on the eighth day of the month. If we do the math, we find that each month consists of sabbaths that fall on the 8 th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th days of the month.

What makes this calendar all the more unusual is the fact that, from the perspective of those who recognize a continuously repeating weekly cycle, lunar sabbatarians observe the weekly sabbath on different days of the week each month. If you aren’t sufficiently confused by this point, then I will point out that there are different sects of lunar sabbatarians, some of whom believe the weekly sabbath should fall on the 7 th, 14th, 21st

and 28th days of the month. I will provide a sample calendar later in this study in order to better acquaint you with what a lunar sabbatarian calendar looks like.

When I first heard of this doctrine, I could not believe that anyone would be so gullible as to fall for such an obvious fallacy. And yet, it appears that this doctrine is beginning to gain some ground and more websites and more people are popping up in defense of this doctrine. The truth of the seriousness of this issue hit home when a man whom I had brought to the faith began to accept this doctrine and eventually accused me of being “blind” and “grieving the Ruach (spirit)” because I would not accept this interpretation of Scripture. Even though I presented substantial evidence to show that lunar sabbaths cannot be Scriptural, he did not accept my answers, in spite of not offering reasonable responses to the objections which I raised. I realized then that this issue could no longer be ignored, which explains the reason why I am writing this article.

iii.

I realize many people have written extensive articles refuting this doctrine. However, lunar sabbatarians tend to jump from one subject to another so quickly that it is difficult to get a word in. We need to have at our disposal a “Lunar Sabbath Emergency Kit” in order to quickly go down the list and answer their claims. Our answers must be brief and to the point if we truly wish to defend our faith. Therefore, while I would like to persuade lunar sabbatarians that their beliefs are in error—I feel it is best if I direct my research to those who have not yet heard of and/or know very little about this doctrine. This presentation therefore could become a useful tool to give short direct answers to the lunar sabbath doctrines. It does not cover all the issues, only what I believe to be “core” issues—issues which can easily and directly be addressed.

These answers are divided into four groupings: Issues Arising from the TaNaK, Issues Arising from the Messianic Writings, Issues Arising from Commentaries, and Issues Arising from Ancient History and Science. Each numbered point has Bold/Italic, Bold, and regular text. The Bold/Italic text is the brief statement refuting that particular point regarding lunar sabbaths. The rest of the Bold text is a more complete explanation. The regular text that follows is an even more detailed explanation, including possibly illustrations and full Scripture quotes.

ii.

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION: WHAT IS LUNAR SABBATARIANISM?............................................1

ISSUES ARISING FROM THE TANAK...........................................................................71. THE MOON NEWLY CREATED ON THE FOURTH DAY DISRUPTS LUNAR SABBATH..........72. THE MOON RULES THE “NIGHT” NOT THE “DAY”—WE ARE NOT CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT............................................................................................................................73. THE LUNAR CYCLE IS NOT THE ONLY CYCLE OF TIME THAT IS CALLED A “MOED” OR “APPOINTED TIME.”..........................................................................................................94. THE EXODUS WOULD HAVE BEEN ON A LUNAR SABBATH.......................................145. THE COUNT TO PENTECOST DISRUPTS LUNAR SABBATH DOCTRINE........................156. THE FALLING OF MANNA IN THE WILDERNESS INDICATES CONSECUTIVE SEVEN DAY CYCLES FOR 40 YEARS................................................................................................187. THE SABBATICAL/JUBILEE CYCLES PROVE THAT THE WEEKLY CYCLE IS A CONTINUOUS REPEATING CYCLE...................................................................................20

ISSUES ARISING FROM THE MESSIANIC WRITINGS...............................................228. THE DAY MESSIAH HEALED BLIND MAN WAS PROBABLY NOT A LUNAR SABBATH....229. DID THE MESSIAH TRAVEL ON A LUNAR SABBATH?.................................................2310. THE DEATH AND RESURRECTION OF YAHUSHUA DOES NOT LINE UP WITH LUNAR SABBATHS....................................................................................................................24

ISSUES ARISING FROM REFERENCE WORKS AND COMMENTARIES.................2711. DOES THE UNIVERSAL JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA GIVE US A CREDIBLE WITNESS CONCERNING THE ORIGINS OF THE SABBATH?................................................................2812. DOES THE BABYLONIAN (AND POSSIBLY ASSYRIAN) CUSTOM OF KEEPING SOMETHING LIKE LUNAR SABBATHS COME FROM THE HEBREWS?..................................29

ISSUES ARISING FROM HISTORY AND SCIENCE....................................................3313. THE GREAT ENDURANCE AND UNIVERSALITY OF THE WEEKLY CYCLE..................3314. CYCLES OF SEVEN IN MUSIC, SOUND AND LIGHT................................................3515. SCIENCE CONFIRMS THAT CYCLES OF SEVEN EXIST IN NATURE, AS A NATURAL RHYTHM WITHIN MAN AND BEAST..................................................................................3816. THE WORD “SABBATH” HAS BEEN PRESERVED IN MANY LANGUAGES AND ALWAYS TO DESIGNATE THE 7TH DAY SABBATH (SATURDAY)........................................................4117. FOUR MAJOR WITNESSES INDICATE THAT 200 YEARS BEFORE THE MESSIAH THE WEEKLY CYCLE WAS WIDELY UNDERSTOOD THROUGHOUT JUDEA TO BE OF A CONTINUOUS NATURE, NOT BASED UPON THE CYCLES OF THE MOON...........................4319. IF WE ASSUME THAT THE JEWS WERE KEEPING LUNAR SABBATHS AT THE TIME OF MESSIAH, THE QUESTION WE HAVE TO ASK IS "WHEN DID IT CHANGE?" AND, "HOW DID IT CHANGE?"....................................................................................................................5220. JEWISH HISTORIAN JOSEPHUS TESTIFIES OF CONTINUOUS WEEKLY CYCLE.........5421. JEWISH HISTORIAN PHILO TESTIFIES OF CONTINUOUS WEEKLY CYCLE................55

CONCLUSION: LUNAR SABBATHS ARE A DECEPTION........................................55

i

Introduction: What Is Lunar Sabbatarianism?

The lunar sabbath doctrine reasons that the weekly Sabbath is not based upon a continuously repeating cycle of seven day weeks starting from the time of creation. Instead, lunar sabbatarians believe that the seven-day cycle is to begin on the day following every New Moon and is “reset” every month. The result is that they teach that the sabbath day changes every month when the monthly cycle is “reset” at the sighting of the New Moon (or calculated conjunction, depending on which teaching they follow).

Here is the Scripture that lunar sabbatarians will often start with to anchor their belief in lunar sabbaths:

“And Elohim said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And Elohim made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And Elohim set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and Elohim saw that it was good. And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.” (Genesis 1:14-19)

A typical explanation of this text from a lunar sabbatarian point of view indicates that the phrase “let them be for lights. . . “ is the keynote proof establishing lunar sabbaths. Notice what they say about this in this article The New Moon and the Weekly Sabbath—Side-By-Side!, by John D. Keyser:

“Let's, now, read Genesis 1:14 for ourselves—

“Then God said, ‘Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for SIGNS and SEASONS, and for DAYS and YEARS.’

“In verse 16 we read:

“’Then God made two great lights: the greater light [sun] to rule the day, and the lesser light [moon] to rule the night. He made the stars also.’

“Now, we should be able to recognize that whatever these ‘lights’ are, they are NATURAL PHENOMENA which dictate the rules of order for calculating time. And, notice, it is not a singular source of light YEHOVAH God made (i.e., the sun) but all collectively – ‘let THEM [the sun and the moon] be for signs...’

1

“It should be quite apparent that nothing in our present seven-day cycle or week can be tied to anything in the natural phenomena that YEHOVAH God outlines in the above verses -- the sun, moon or stars. Moreover, our ‘week’ doesn't even flow with the current Gregorian calendar. January 1st (the beginning of our ‘year’) falls on a different ‘week day’ everytime it comes around. The beginning and end of our seven-day cycle are simply not ANCHORED in nature, and this in itself proves that YEHOVAH's true Sabbath day is neither Saturday nor Sunday (except occasionally when the Sabbath happens to fall on these days) -- in light of the fact that:

“1/. The reckoning of time is only by the ‘lights in the heavens’ and

“2/. the Fourth Commandment clearly specifies that YEHOVAH God had a particular day in mind when He said ‘remember to keep the sabbath holy.’”1

What are the basic assumptions of this author, assumptions which have not yet even been established? 1) “The reckoning of time is only by the ‘lights in the heavens’. 2) That in order to calculate the weekly cycle, it requires the use of both of the great lights—the sun and the moon.

Please take note that lunar sabbatarians will place emphasis upon the fact that this text says “and let them be for. . . .” Does this prove that we must use the moon and the sun both to establish any of the great cycles of Yahweh’s calendar? Of course not! The sun does not need the moon to determine the days. The moon does not need the sun to determine the months. And as for the stars . . . other than to establish the general seasons of the year (and help ocean voyagers determine their course), they neither determine the days, the months, or the years!! If you are going to say that “let them” refers to the heavenly bodies and how they must be involved in the establishment of any cycle of time, then how do the stars fit into such an equation? They do not!

The first assumption of lunar sabbatarians is that in order to calculate the weekly cycle, it requires the use of both of the great lights—the sun and the moon. And yet, they leave the stars out of this equation. This is one of their chief arguments, and it is based upon their faulty interpretation of Genesis 1:14. They believe that it commands both the sun and the moon be used to establish the weekly cycle, since the weekly cycle cannot be seen in the natural order of things. However, while it is true that the weekly cycle does not appear to be seen in nature,2 the account in Genesis 2 plainly reveals that the weekly cycle was not based upon the heavenly lights, but based upon the 7 days of Creation week:

1John D. Keyser, The New Moon and the Weekly Sabbath—Side-By-Side! http://www.hope-of-israel.org/sideside.htm 2We will be presenting evidence soon that shows that cycles of seven are actually common in nature, continuous cycles of seven musical notes, seven colors in the rainbow, and cycles of seven day biological rhythms as described in the relatively new science of chronobiology.

2

http://www.hope-of-israel.org/sideside.htm

http://www.hope-of-israel.org/sideside.htm

“And on the seventh day Elohim ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And Elohim blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which Elohim created and made.” (Genesis 2:2-3)

In looking at this text and the text of Genesis 1:14, lunar sabbatarians seem to overlook the fact that 1) The stars are not included (by them) in the list of great lights used to establish cycles of time, 2) The “week” is not mentioned in this text, as it only speaks of “days” and “years.” 3) In point of fact, not all of the great cycles of time are based primarily upon the lights in the heavens (examples: the seven day week, the seven weeks to Pentecost, the seven year sabbaticals, and the seven weeks of years leading to the year of Jubilee). What they seem to overlook is that Yahweh intended to establish the weekly cycle based upon things which are “not seen” so as to determine who (by faith) would give honor to Him as the Creator of the universe. If it were not so, He could have simply included the word “weeks” in the list of things to be determined by the greater and lesser lights of Genesis 1:14. Yet He did not—not there and not anywhere else.

Another of their arguments is that there is no difference between the weekly Sabbath and the 7 annual feast day Sabbaths. Only a cursory examination of the evidence will show that this is simply not true. For example, the word used for the weekly Sabbath (in Hebrew) is “Shabbat” and it has a slightly different meaning from the word used to describe the feast day Sabbaths and that word is “shabbatone.” Shabbatone (in the Hebrew) indicates a day in which no “servile work” shall be performed, whereas on the Shabbat “no work” shall be done of any kind. It is a very subtle yet significant difference showing that the seven annual sabbaths and the weekly sabbath are not the same.

Another assumption (related to the first one listed here) is that since the weekly Sabbath is mentioned right along with the other feast days in Leviticus 23, the weekly Sabbath must also be based upon the moon just as the feast days are. However, while the Sabbath is mentioned at the start of this chapter it is only referred to as a “moed” (or “appointed time”) in the Masoretic texts. The Septuagint refers to the sabbath as a “holy day” (or heortai) in this passage, not as a “moed.” By this example (and by others) it shows that the seventh day Sabbath is a special “holy day” distinct from the other “appointed times.”

The Hebrew word for “appointed times” has a much more broad range of meaning than some would like to give it, therefore not all of the “appointed times” are determined by the moon. The Hebrew word “moed” can not only mean “appointed feast” but also “meeting place,” “a fixed time,” “until now,” “appointed days,” “appointed season,” and “assembly.” Yahweh did establish the moon to determine the “appointed feast” type of “appointed times” (or “moedim”) according to Genesis 1:14, but not all “appointed feasts.”3 He gave us the sun to rule over (and therefore establish) the day. The sun is also used to determine cycles of time (the day and the year) just as the moon is used to

3This will be explained in more detail later.

3

determine the months. To say that only the moon can be used to determine the weeks is just pure fantasy.

Another assumption is that since the Sabbath in Exodus 16 also happens to line up with the 15th day of a particular month, therefore it is the Sabbath because of lunar cycles. However, the lunar cycles will (on occasion) begin on a day such that the weekly Sabbath and the lunar cycles will be in alignment. This is not evidence of a lunar sabbath—just because Exodus 16 appears to give us one Sabbath day which may line up with an alleged lunar sabbath.

The Sabbath is a memorial of Creation. To say that it must change every month according to the cycles of the moon is to change that memorial of the Creation of the Earth into a memorial to the moon and its creation. In what way did the moon play a part in the great cycle of time mentioned in Genesis 1-2? It played no part at all, since it was not created until the fourth day. Also, the moon is the “lesser light” not the “greater light” (which is the sun). And so the Sabbath commandment is quite simple and does not require extensive algebra to figure it out:

“Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of Yahweh thy Elohim: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days Yahweh made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore Yahweh blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.” (Exodus 20:8-11)

The pattern mentioned here is work six days, rest one day. Keeping lunar sabbaths does not and cannot fulfill the requirements of this commandment. When the end of the month comes a lunar sabbatarian must rest for more than one day—in contradiction to Scripture. Then when the next lunar cycle comes, he is no longer using the same cycle. The cycle is broken. In addition, this command does not even suggest that the cycle of six days work and one day rest would be interrupted by a new moon.

Now here is a typical question one might receive from someone who is seeking to become (or has already become) a lunar sabbatarian: “Can you prove historically that our seven day week goes all the way back to creation?” Of course, the answer is no. But a more important question for us is, “Can you show from Scripture that there is a continuous unending seven-day cycle from the time of Creation?” We believe we can, and here is why:

Genesis 1 and 2 plainly tell us that Yahweh created the heavens and the earth in six days and rested on the seventh. Therefore, the seven-day week that we have today is based upon and is a continuation of that first week of creation. However, since this may not be enough to convince a lunar sabbatarian—we will introduce other evidence that is even more compelling.

4

The first evidence we will mention is the fact that in Leviticus 23:15-16 it plainly commands the Israelites to count 7 Sabbaths until the “morrow after the seventh Sabbath”, for a total count of 50 days. Now in case your math is a little rusty, please consider that 7 X 7 = 49, and that 49 + 1 (the “morrow after the seventh sabbath”) = 50. Here is a clear example of weeks which extend beyond a lunar cycle (which could only contain 4 weeks). Now if the weekly Sabbath were to be controlled by the moon, then it would be difficult (if not impossible) to explain how you could fit seven lunar sabbaths within a period of only 50 days. It would require 52 days to obtain seven sabbaths, not 50 (according to weekly sabbath counting only). And if you count the “intermission” days as some groups do (dark moon and new moon) as sabbaths, then you will reach the seventh sabbath too early—after only 37 days. In order to have 50 days in the count, the 7 weeks which expired during this time would have to be consecutive weeks.

Another useful piece of evidence is that found in the Sabbatical/Jubilee year cycles. In Leviticus 25:1-11 it plainly states that Israel was to work the land for six years and allow it to rest on the seventh year (a sabbatical year). This is so obviously based upon the Creation week that it hardly needs to be mentioned. Yahweh also requires us to work six days and rest on the seventh day. Is there a connection? Yes. This is significant enough, but there is more. They were also to count seven weeks of years (7 X 7 = 49) and in the 50th year they were to declare a year of Jubilee. Weeks of years actually have nothing to do with the moon, and again the fact that there are seven weeks of consecutive years proves without doubt that “weeks” are intended to be understood as continuous cycles of time. And again, this is just another significant piece of evidence which supports the concept of the weekly cycle being continuous as opposed to supposedly being broken up (by the phases of the moon).

A third piece of evidence which we feel is very important in showing that a “week” is intended to mean a continuous seven day cycle is the actual meaning and usage of such words as “week” and “sabbath” as they are used in the Scriptures. The Hebrew word for “Sabbath” (shab-bawth') appears to be closely related to the Hebrew word for “week”, and in the Greek shabbaton is translated as both “week” and “sabbath.” The Hebrew word for week is shaw-boo'-ah and it literally means something that is “sevened”. The word can mean both “seven” and “week” and can even be used to mean “weeks of years.” In the two examples given above, we have a week (shaw-boo'-ah) and the plural form of that word (shaw-boo-oth). So let us consider the fact that a “week” is a period of something (like a day) which has been “sevened” (or multiplied by seven). A week is therefore a period of seven days. The plural form of that word (shaw-boo-oth) means “weeks” and indicates more than one week, or consecutive multiple periods of seven days.

Now let us stop and think about this: If Yahweh had intended for us to keep lunar sabbaths, then there could not be more than four continuous weeks at any given time (before the weekly cycle is reset by the new moon). And yet we have two clear

5

examples from Scripture: the count to Pentecost (which happens to be called the ”feast of weeks (shaw-boo-oth), and the count to the year of Jubilee, where the “weeks” (shaw-boo-oth) extend beyond just four weeks to include seven weeks and the next day (or year) after the seventh week is to equal 50 days (or years), a double confirmation of the continuous weekly cycle.

For most of us, the answers given here so far are quite sufficient to demonstrate that lunar sabbaths are not taught in Scripture. But for those who wish to hold onto their “lunar sabbatarian” beliefs, such evidence (while often known of) is usually ignored. They cannot answer these most basic points, yet they will often merely change the subject so as to avoid the need to admit they were wrong. It is therefore hoped that this listing of 21 Concise Answers to Lunar Sabbatarian Teachings will prove to be a valuable arsenal in the war over truth verses error.

6

Issues Arising from the TaNaK

1. The Moon Newly Created on the Fourth Day Disrupts Lunar Sabbath.

In the Creation account of Genesis 1-2, the sun, moon and stars are mentioned as being created on the fourth day. Most likely, the moon would have been created in the “new moon” phase of its orbital path. Of course, even our suggestion that the moon was created in the “new moon” phase is conjecture since we have no idea which “phase” the moon was created in. Scripture simply does not tell us. Nevertheless, it tells us enough that we can be certain that this creation account cannot be used to establish lunar sabbaths. If this is valid, and the moon was created on the fourth day (and in the “new moon” phase), then the 7 th day of the new month would have been the 10th day of creation not the 7th day of creation! Conclusion: The seven days of creation were in no way connected with the phases of the moon.

There are those who will claim that the sun, moon and stars were created on the first day since Scripture says there was “evening and morning”. They will point out that there had to be a light source to distinguish day from night and the sun was most likely that source. Therefore (according to them) on the 4th day all of these heavenly bodies came out from behind “clouds of vapor” which had previously been “blocked” from view. However, the text is clear that these were created (not just revealed) on the 4th day, and whatever the light source that created the appearance of “evening and morning” it could not have been the sun—at least not in it’s final form (as created on the 4th day).

Reference:

“And Elohim said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And Elohim made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And Elohim set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and Elohim saw that it was good.” (Genesis 1:14-18)

2. The Moon Rules the “Night” Not the “Day”—We Are Not Children of the Night.

It is interesting that a closer look at Genesis 1:16 shows that the “greater light” (i.e., the “sun”) rules the day while the “lesser light” (i.e., the “moon”) rules the night. The cycle of the sun determines days (7 of which make up a week) and the years (based on the equinox). The moon is used to determine the months and therefore the timing of the feasts. The point is that lunar sabbatarians reverse the order of importance to the heavenly bodies—it is the sun that rules the day, not

7

the moon. The week is composed of 7 days, therefore it is based on the sun NOT on the moon. In metaphoric language, the righteous are not “children of the night” but of the day. Therefore, they will not use the “moon” as the foundation of their faith, nor to establish lunar sabbaths.

Here is how that verse should be translated based on the actual Hebrew text: “And Elohim made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night and the stars.” (Genesis 1:16) The phrase “he made” in the KJV is in italics, showing that it is supplied. This text is actually telling us that the sun “rules the day” and the moon “rules the night and the stars.” Please notice how it is translated (quoted verbatim) from several different Bible versions:

“And God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day and the smaller light to rule the night, and the stars also.” (Modern King James Version)

“And God made two great lights: a greater light to rule the day; and a lesser light to rule the night: and The stars.” (Douay Rheims Bible)

And God made the two great lights--the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night--and the stars. (English Standard Version)

Now what is the significance of this? Lunar sabbatarians have reversed the order of importance to the heavenly bodies—the sun has authority over the day, not the moon, as lunar sabbatarians teach. Sometimes the moon can be seen together with the sun, but even then the sun dominates the sky. The moon has its rule over the night, not the day. And it does not (therefore) affect the 7 days of creation. All through the Messianic Writings it speaks of how we should avoid the “works of darkness” and follow the “light of truth.” While it is right to use the moon to determine the timing of the months and the 7 annual festival sabbaths (based on Leviticus 23 in connection with Genesis 1:14-18), to say that the moon should be the foundation of our faith and should be used to determine all of the feasts and strictly determined by the moon is the same as saying the moon is more dominant than the sun, even on a bright sunny day! (Lunar sabbatarians would include in this the 7th day Sabbath, which we believe is greater than a feast). Such a statement as this is so obviously flawed that it only requires the most basic understanding of logic to see through it. Lunar sabbatarians are following the moon even in the most brilliant light of day, and are therefore truly following the “works of darkness.” They are following the “lesser light” and ignoring the “greater light”. We are “children of light” not “children of darkness”! Let us cast off the “works of darkness” as revealed by those who follow “lunar sabbaths.”

References:

“And Elohim made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night and the stars.” (Genesis 1:16)

8

“The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying.” (Romans 13:12-13)

“Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of Elohim upon the children of disobedience. Be not ye therefore partakers with them. For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in Yahweh: walk as children of light: (For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth;) Proving what is acceptable unto Yahweh. And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret. But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light. Wherefore he saith, Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Messiah shall give thee light.” (Ephesians 5:6-14)

3. The lunar cycle is not the only cycle of time that is called a “moed” or “appointed time.”

One of the most significant foundations for the lunar sabbath doctrine is the use of the word “Moed.” In Leviticus 23 the Sabbath is called a “moed,” and because it is linked to Genesis 1:14 it suggests that the heavenly lights are directly involved in determining the great cycles of time. Psalm 104:19 seems to “nail it down” by stating that the “moon” is used to determine “appointed times” (a “moed”). However, the problem is that the word “moed” is used in many different ways to describe many different “cycles” of time. In Jeremiah 8:7 it plainly says that the “stork knoweth her appointed times.” Since the stork is known to return to its location at the same “season” every year, therefore the lunar cycle has nothing to do with this particular “appointed time.” So, not all “appointed times” are determined by the moon.

It is often argued that the new moon is regularly mentioned in connection with the weekly Sabbath and therefore the weekly sabbath must be based upon the new moon. However, this is an assumption which has no basis in Scripture. The fact that they are often mentioned together is no more proof of lunar sabbaths than the idea that “meat and potatoes” often mentioned together proves that “meat” comes from “potatoes”! It is just another example of faulty logic and fallacious reasoning.

Now in Leviticus 23:1-3 the Sabbath is first mentioned among the feasts of Yahweh. The word for “feast days” is this same word mentioned earlier—“mowadah”. It is often translated “appointed times.” So the lunar sabbatarian will use this inference to say (based upon this and Psalm 104:19) that the moon is used to determine the feast days, including the seventh-day Sabbath. However, there is a major flaw in the logic and we will examine this more closely here.

9

The three texts which are tied together to support lunar sabbaths are as follows:

“And Elohim said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons [moedim], and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And Elohim made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And Elohim set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and Elohim saw that it was good.” (Genesis 1:14-18)

“And Yahweh spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, Concerning the feasts [moedim] of Yahweh, which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts. Six days shall work be done: but the seventh day is the sabbath of rest, an holy convocation; ye shall do no work therein: it is the sabbath of Yahweh in all your dwellings. These are the feasts [moedim] of Yahweh, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons. In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is Yahweh’s passover. And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto Yahweh: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread. In the first day ye shall have an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein. But ye shall offer an offering made by fire unto Yahweh seven days: in the seventh day is an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein.” (Leviticus 23:1-8)

“He appointed the moon for seasons [mowadah]: the sun knoweth his going down.” (Psalms 104:19)

By taking verse 19 of Psalms 104 literally, it is understandable why people might be inclined to believe that the moon determines the Sabbath, since the Sabbath (in Leviticus 23) is also called a “moed.” However, while we agree that the moon is used to determine some cycles of time (such as the feast days)—it is obviously not used to determine all cycles of time.

Has the moon been appointed for “appointed times” [moedim]? Of course. Does that mean only the moon can be used for this. No. If such were the case, the text in Psalm 104:19 would have said that “He appointed the moon for ALL seasons.” However, he did not say that. The sun also plays a role in the establishment of the appointed times and cycles, as the rest of that same verse clearly shows.

As we examine the word “moedim” throughout Scripture we find that it is a word which has a much more broad range of meaning so that it is not limited to a set time established strictly by the moon. It has also been translated “seasons,” and therefore

10

could be used to refer to yearly cycles of time as well as monthly. Here is one example of that. In Jeremiah 8:7 it says:

“Yea, the stork in the heaven knoweth her appointed times [mowadah]; and the turtle and the crane and the swallow observe the time of their coming; but My people know not the judgment of Yahweh!”

The stork does not observe monthly migrations, but yearly migrations—just like most all other birds do. So what does this “appointed time” have to do with the moon? Nothing! Yes, the feast days of Leviticus 23 are based upon the moedim, but not all moedim are based upon the moon. The other “appointed times” listed in Leviticus 23 are not a memorial of creation (like the seventh-day sabbath) and are therefore not in the same category. There are those who will try to limit this term “moed” to separate it from other “appointed times” which are obviously not connected with the moon. They will use the term “worship MOEDIM” to distinguish it (based upon the moon) from other “Moedim.” However, the addition of the word “worship” is not found in Scripture. Nowhere in Scripture does it speak of “worship MOEDIM”—it is simply a feeble attempt to explain away the clear evidence of different usages of “Moedim.”

Does the fact that the Sabbath is also called a moed prove that the weekly Sabbath is determined by the moon? No, because we have already learned that there are other ways in which a “moed” can be established in addition to the lunar cycle. The weekly Sabbath is not just a “moed”—it is a special kind of moed called a “holy day” (or heortai) in the Septuagint. It is superior to the other “appointed times” as it is a memorial of creation. We find confirmation of this when we examine the Septuagint translation of Leviticus 23. If all moedim were determined by the moon, then why didn’t the Hebrew scholars who translated the Torah into the Greek Septuagint render the Hebrew word “moedim” with the Greek equivalent of “kairos?”

mo-ade', mo-ade', mo-aw-daw'

From H3259; properly an appointment, that is, a fixed time or season; specifically a festival; conventionally a year; by implication, an assembly (as convened for a definite purpose); technically the congregation; by extension, the place of meeting; also a signal (as appointed beforehand): - appointed (sign, time), (place of, solemn) assembly, congregation, (set, solemn) feast, (appointed, due) season, solemn (-ity), synagogue, (set) time (appointed).

Notice the broad range of uses for this one word moed:

Appointed: Job 30:23.

Meeting Place: Psalm 74:8.

11

A fixed Time: Genesis 17:21, Genesis 18:14, 21:2, Exodus 9:5, Deuteronomy 31:10, Joshua 8:14, Judges 20:38, 1 Samuel 13:8, 1 Samuel 30:35, 2 Samuel 20:5.

Appointed Time: 2 Samuel 24:15, Psalm 102:13, 104:14, Jeremiah 46:17, Daniel 8:19, 11:27, 11:29, 11:35, Habakkuk 2:3.

Until Now: 1 Samuel 9:24.

Appointed Days: 1 Samuel 13:11, Lamentations 2:22.

Appointed Season: Exodus 13:10, Numbers 9:2, 9:3, 9:7, 9:13, 28:2, Deuteronomy 16:16, 2 Kings 4:16, 4:17, Jeremiah 8:7, Hosea 2:9.

Appointed Time (of the Month): Exodus 23:15, 34:18.

Appointed Feasts: Leviticus 23:2, 23:4, 23:37, 23:44, Numbers 10:10, 15:3, 29:39, 1 Chronicles 23:31, 2 Chronicles 2:4, 8:13, 30:22, 31:3, Ezra 3:5, Nehemiah 10:33, Isaiah 1:14, Lamentations 1:14, Lamentations 2:6, 2:7, Ezekiel 36:38, Ezekiel 44:24, 45:17, 46:9, 46:11, Hosea 2:11, 9:5, 12:9, Zechariah 8:19.

Time, Times, and Half a Time: Daniel 12:7.

Assembly (or Congregation): Exodus 17:21, 28:43, 29:4, 29:10, 29:11, 29:30, 29:32, 29:42, 29:44, 30:16, 30:18, 30:20, 30:26, 30:36, 31:7, 33:7, 35:21, 38:8, 38:30, 39:32, 39:40, 40:2, 40:6, 40:7, 40:12, 40:22, 40:24, 40:26, 40:29, 40:30, 40:32, 40:34, 40:35. Leviticus 1:1, 1:3, 1:5, 3:2, 3:8, 3:13, 4:4, 4:5, 4:7, 4:14, 4:16, 4:18, 6:16, 6:26, 6:30, 8:3, 8:4, 8:31, 8:33, 8:35, 9:5, 9:23, 10:7, 10:9, 12:6, 14:11, 14:23, 15:14, 15:29, 16:7, 16:16, 16:17, 16:20, 16:23, 16:33, 17:4, 17:5, 17:6, 17:9, 19:21, 24:3. Numbers 1:1, 1:2, 2:17, 3:7, 3:8, 3:25, 3:38, 4:3, 4:4, 4:15, 4:23, 4:25, 4:28, 4:30, 4:31, 4:33, 4:35, 4:37, 4:39, 4:41, 4:43, 4:47, 6:10, 6:13, 6:18, 7:5, 7:89, 8:9, 8:15, 8:19, 8:22, 8:24, 8:26, 10:3, 11:16, 12:4, 14:10, 16:2, 16:18, 16:19, 16:42, 16:43, 16:50, 17:4, 18:4, 18:6, 18:21, 18:22, 18:23, 18:31, 19:4, 20:6, 25:6, 27:2, 31:54, Deuteronomy 31:14, Joshua 18:1, 19:51, 1 Samuel 2:22, 1 Kings 8:4, 1 Chronicles 6:32, 9:21, 23:32. 2 Chronicles 1:3, 1:6, 1:13, 5:5, Psalm 74:4, 75:2, Isaiah 14:13, 33:20, Lamentations 1:15, 2:6, Zephaniah 3:18.

Some of the texts listed here have been highlighted. The reason for doing this is to show that they give us additional evidence in support of the idea that the seventh day Sabbath is distinct from the other feast days. Surely if the seventh-day Sabbath were exactly the same and held on the exact same day as many of the other feasts, then such a distinction would be proof that they are based upon completely different methods of computation.

“And it came to pass, when the king of Ai saw it, that they hasted and rose up early, and the men of the city went out against Israel to battle, he and

12

all his people, at a time appointed, before the plain; but he wist not that there were liers in ambush against him behind the city.” (Joshua 8:14)

Here we have the same word “moed” used to describe a certain time which they were to meet the king of Ai in battle. Nowhere in this text does it even hint at the idea that such an “appointment” was based upon the moon.

“Now there was an appointed sign between the men of Israel and the liers in wait, that they should make a great flame with smoke rise up out of the city.” (Judges 20:38)

Here we have the same word again, and this time it is referring to a “an appointed sign”—it is not even speaking of a particular time. And even if it were speaking of an “appointed time,” there is no connection between this and the moon.

“Yea, the stork in the heaven knoweth her appointed times; and the turtle and the crane and the swallow observe the time of their coming; but my people know not the judgment of Yahweh.” (Jeremiah 8:7)

We already addressed this text. The stork knows her “appointed times,” and most assuredly they are not based upon the moon but upon the completion of a yearly cycle.

“And he hath violently taken away his tabernacle, as if it were of a garden: he hath destroyed his places of the assembly: Yahweh hath caused the solemn feasts and sabbaths to be forgotten in Zion, and hath despised in the indignation of his anger the king and the priest.” (Lamentations 2:6)

If the “seventh day Sabbath” and the “feast days” are really one and the same days, then why does this text speak of them as if they are two distinctly different days? We could ask the same question about the next text:

“I will also cause all her mirth to cease, her feast days, her new moons, and her sabbaths, and all her solemn feasts.” (Hosea 2:11)

Please take note of the fact that this is just one of many texts which lunar sabbatarians like to use to supposedly prove that the sabbaths, feast days, and new moons are all based upon the moon. However, it actually proves just the opposite. As we mentioned in connection with the text from Lamentations 2:6, the fact that the “moedim” (feasts) are mentioned in contrast to the “Shabbat” (sabbath) is obviously showing that the two are different. The use of the word “and” between them also shows that they are all distinct from each other. The “feast day” is not the same as the “new moon”. And the “new moon” is not the same as the “sabbath.” They are all different, just like “meat and potatoes” are different. To say that they are the exact same is simply a clear example of faulty logic.

13

4. The Exodus Would Have Been on a Lunar Sabbath.

Israel left Egypt on the 15th day of the month, traveling a distance of 10-30 miles that day (Numbers 33:3). Yahweh would not have timed these events so that they would have to travel on a Sabbath (which would have been a sin) so therefore it was not a Sabbath. And yet, for many lunar sabbatarians, the 15th day of the month is a lunar sabbath to them. And for other lunar sabbatarians (who honor the 14th day of the month) they would have also been breaking Sabbath by collecting spoils from the Egyptians on that day (according to Exodus 11:1-4). How could they have traveled on a Sabbath, which was forbidden by Yahweh's law? Or how could they have collected spoils on the Sabbath, which was forbidden by Yahweh's law?

When Israel left the land of Egypt, we are able (because of the exact timing of the Passover) to determine which day of the month certain events took place. According to Scripture, Yahweh allowed the 10 plagues to fall with deliberate timing such that Israel would leave Egypt and travel from 10 to 30 miles (night and day) on the 15th day of Abib (Numbers 33:3). And yet, according to many lunar sabbatarians, the 15th day of the month is a lunar sabbath. If the 15th day were a lunar sabbath, what are these Israelites doing breaking the "sabbath" by making a long journey on that day?

And for those lunar sabbatarians who believe the 14th day of the month would be a lunar sabbath, they have a similar issue to overcome. On the 14th day the Israelites were going about collecting their "back pay" (the "spoils of Egypt"), according to Exodus 11:1-4. If the 14th day were a lunar sabbath, what are these Israelites doing breaking the "sabbath" by collecting spoils on that day? The only way to answer these questions is to realize that Israel did not keep lunar sabbaths.

References:

“And they departed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month; on the morrow after the passover the children of Israel went out with an high hand in the sight of all the Egyptians.” (Numbers 33:3)

“Speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow of his neighbour, and every woman of her neighbour, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold. And Yahweh gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians. Moreover the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt, in the sight of Pharaoh's servants, and in the sight of the people. And Moses said, Thus saith Yahweh, About midnight will I go out into the midst of Egypt:” (Exodus 11:2-4)

14

5. The Count to Pentecost Disrupts Lunar Sabbath Doctrine.

In Leviticus 23:9-16 Scripture plainly tells us (in verse 16) that the children of Israel were to count 50 days from the “morrow after the sabbath.” Now was that the “morrow” after the weekly seventh day Sabbath, or the “morrow” after the “festival sabbath”? Well, it matters not which view you take on this particular point, for the text plainly says that during that 50 day period there would be “seven Sabbaths”. Since a lunar sabbath calendar would add extra days to the cycle at the end of every month, it would require 52 actual days to take them to Pentecost and only six Sabbaths (shown in blue) would take place during that 50 day period of time, not seven. If you count the “intermission” days (shown in red) like a “sabbath” (dark moon and new moon) then you will reach Pentecost too early, in only 37 days. If you do not count “intermission” days (shown in green) you would reach Pentecost in 44 days. Therefore, whichever system lunar sabbatarians use to count to Pentecost totally contradicts the plain teaching of Scripture!

Illustration:

Month of Abib (Lunar Sabbath Cycles)

1New Moon

2 3 4 5 6 7 8Lunar

Sabbath9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 1

Passover Day

Lun. Sabbath 1st Day

Feast of Unleavened

Bread16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 2 1

FeastDay 1 of 50 day Count






Lun. Sabbath Last Day of


23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3 3 2

Day 8 of 50 day Count






Lun. SabbathDay 14 of 50

day Count

30 4


15

Month of Zif (Lunar Sabbath Cycles)

1

New Moon


2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5 4 3







LunarSabbathDay 23 of

50 day Count

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 5







Lun. SabbathDay 30 of

50 day Count

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 7 6








50 day Count

23 24 25 26 27 28 294 7 6








50 day Count

Day 37 above would be the 7th Sabbath, according to many lunar Sabbatarians.

Day 44 above would be the 7th

Sabbath according to some lunar Sabbatarians.

4Some months have 29 days and some have 30 days, therefore in our illustration we alternate between both.

16

Month of Sivan (Lunar Sabbath Cycles)1

New Moon


2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7


Day 47 of50 day Count

Day 48 of50 day Count




7th

SabbathDay 52 of 50

day Count9 10 11 12 13 14 15

LunarSabbath

16 17 18 19 20 21 22Lunar

Sabbath23 24 25 26 27 28 29

LunarSabbath

30

Day 52 above would also be the 7th

Sabbath according to some lunar Sabbatarians.

Here we have placed the lunar sabbath count to Pentecost on a calendar so as to see if it will fit within the Scriptural requirements for fulfilling Pentecost. Scripture states the count to Pentecost must be a 50 day count, it must include seven Sabbaths (which are shown in red, green, and blue), and the 1st day must be the “morrow after the Sabbath.“5 Based upon this simple calendar, lunar sabbaths cannot be valid since in the count to Pentecost they require either 37, 44, or 52 days to reach the weekly “seventh sabbath.”

Reference:

“And Yahweh spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye be come into the land which I give unto you, and shall reap the harvest thereof, then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before Yahweh, to be accepted for you: on the morrow after the sabbath

5The Septuagint reading for Leviticus 23:15-16 is: “And ye shall number to yourselves from the day after the sabbath, from the day on which ye shall offer the sheaf of the heave-offering, seven full weeks: until the morrow after the last week ye shall number fifty days. . .” In the illustration above we used the example of the first day after the weekly Sabbath to begin the count, but for those who start the count according to the Septuagint, that is, after the “High Sabbath” or first day of unleavened bread (no matter which day it begins on) it also yields similar results.

17

the priest shall wave it. . . . And ye shall eat neither bread, nor parched corn, nor green ears, until the selfsame day that ye have brought an offering unto your Elohim: it shall be a statute forever throughout your generations in all your dwellings. And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto Yahweh.” (Leviticus 23:9-11, 14-16)

6. The Falling of Manna in the Wilderness Indicates Consecutive Seven Day Cycles for 40 Years.

The murmuring of the Israelites began soon after the 15th day. Now some will claim that the count of the six days begins on the following day, therefore showing that the 22nd day was a lunar sabbath. Maybe the 15th day was a Sabbath, but it cannot be proven for certain because we are not told exactly when (after that day) they began complaining, nor when exactly the falling of the manna would begin. The fact they were traveling on the 15 th day provides strong evidence that it was not a Sabbath day, for Yahweh would not have them travel on that day. But even it if were a Sabbath day, it would not prove that it was a “lunar sabbath” since there will be times in which the lunar cycles will be in-line with the weekly Sabbath. Above and beyond all of that, the Scripture plainly teaches that the manna which fell in the wilderness fell for six days, with a double portion falling on the sixth day in preparation for the Sabbath. The Septuagint and other authoritative historical sources confirm that it was a double portion that could not allow for extended sabbaths at the end of the month. It nowhere says or even implies that this cycle of seven days would be broken by the new moon.

According to the Torah, Yahweh had to “re-educate” the Israelites concerning how and when to keep the sabbath—for that was something which they had tended to forget in their Egyptian captivity. The tool He used for this was the falling of manna for 6 days, with no manna falling on the Sabbath (or seventh) day. There is no evidence that this pattern of 6 days manna and 1 day of rest had been altered during the 40 years in the wilderness. There is no evidence that the pattern was “reset” with every new moon. If, as lunar sabbatarians maintain, the moon is used to determine the weekly sabbath, then why did Yahweh use the 6 days of manna when He could have used the actual phases of the moon to be their guide? He could have simply said, “look up at the sky and when you see the new moon you know the new week has begun, then keep Sabbaths every seventh day approximating the quarter, full, waning quarter and dark moon.” While it is true that in some societies such a division as this might be found (Babylonians and possibly others), such a statement as this cannot be found in the whole of Scripture. And if this were true, then using manna to teach them how and when to keep the Sabbaths would not have been necessary.

.Reference:

18

“And they took their journey from Elim, and all the congregation of the children of Israel came unto the wilderness of Sin, which is between Elim and Sinai, on the fifteenth day of the second month after their departing out of the land of Egypt. And the whole congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and Aaron in the wilderness: And the children of Israel said unto them, Would to Elohim we had died by the hand of Yahweh in the land of Egypt, when we sat by the flesh pots, and when we did eat bread to the full; for ye have brought us forth into this wilderness, to kill this whole assembly with hunger. Then said Yahweh unto Moses, Behold, I will rain bread from heaven for you; and the people shall go out and gather a certain rate every day, that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law, or no. And it shall come to pass, that on the sixth day they shall prepare that which they bring in; and it shall be twice as much as they gather daily. And Moses and Aaron said unto all the children of Israel, At even, then ye shall know that Yahweh hath brought you out from the land of Egypt: And in the morning, then ye shall see the glory of Yahweh; for that he heareth your murmurings against Yahweh: and what are we, that ye murmur against us? And Moses said, This shall be, when Yahweh shall give you in the evening flesh to eat, and in the morning bread to the full; for that Yahweh heareth your murmurings which ye murmur against him: and what are we? your murmurings are not against us, but against Yahweh. And Moses spake unto Aaron, Say unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, Come near before Yahweh: for he hath heard your murmurings. And it came to pass, as Aaron spake unto the whole congregation of the children of Israel, that they looked toward the wilderness, and, behold, the glory of Yahweh appeared in the cloud. And Yahweh spake unto Moses, saying, I have heard the murmurings of the children of Israel: speak unto them, saying, At even ye shall eat flesh, and in the morning ye shall be filled with bread; and ye shall know that I am Yahweh your Elohim. And it came to pass, that at even the quails came up, and covered the camp: and in the morning the dew lay round about the host. And when the dew that lay was gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay a small round thing, as small as the hoar frost on the ground. And when the children of Israel saw it, they said one to another, It is manna: for they wist not what it was. And Moses said unto them, This is the bread which Yahweh hath given you to eat. This is the thing which Yahweh hath commanded, Gather of it every man according to his eating, an omer for every man, according to the number of your persons; take ye every man for them which are in his tents. And the children of Israel did so, and gathered, some more, some less. And when they did mete it with an omer, he that gathered much had nothing over, and he that gathered little had no lack; they gathered every man according to his eating. And Moses said, Let no man leave of it till the morning. Notwithstanding they hearkened not unto Moses; but some of them left of it until the morning, and it bred worms, and stank: and

19

Moses was wroth with them. And they gathered it every morning, every man according to his eating: and when the sun waxed hot, it melted. And it came to pass, that on the sixth day they gathered twice as much bread, two omers for one man: and all the rulers of the congregation came and told Moses. And he said unto them, This is that which Yahweh hath said, To morrow is the rest of the holy sabbath unto Yahweh: bake that which ye will bake to day, and seethe that ye will seethe; and that which remaineth over lay up for you to be kept until the morning. And they laid it up till the morning, as Moses bade: and it did not stink, neither was there any worm therein. And Moses said, Eat that to day; for to day is a sabbath unto Yahweh: to day ye shall not find it in the field. Six days ye shall gather it; but on the seventh day, which is the sabbath, in it there shall be none. And it came to pass, that there went out some of the people on the seventh day for to gather, and they found none. And Yahweh said unto Moses, How long refuse ye to keep my commandments and my laws? See, for that Yahweh hath given you the sabbath, therefore he giveth you on the sixth day the bread of two days; abide ye every man in his place, let no man go out of his place on the seventh day. So the people rested on the seventh day.” (Exodus 16:1-30)

7. The Sabbatical/Jubilee Cycles Prove that the Weekly Cycle is a Continuous Repeating Cycle.

In Leviticus 25 Moses gives us instruction on how to keep the Sabbatical and Jubilee Years. This simple evidence shows that the years were to be divided into six years of planting crops and one year of letting the land rest. This was to be repeated seven times and in the 50th year a year of release (Jubilee) was to be proclaimed. Such a system as this is another solid proof that the weekly cycle is a continuous cycle which is not based upon the moon, but instead is based upon Creation week.

“And Yahweh spake unto Moses in mount Sinai, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye come into the land which I give you, then shall the land keep a sabbath unto Yahweh. Six years thou shalt sow thy field, and six years thou shalt prune thy vineyard, and gather in the fruit thereof; But in the seventh year shall be a sabbath of rest unto the land, a sabbath for Yahweh: thou shalt neither sow thy field, nor prune thy vineyard. That which groweth of its own accord of thy harvest thou shalt not reap, neither gather the grapes of thy vine undressed: for it is a year of rest unto the land. And the sabbath of the land shall be meat for you; for thee, and for thy servant, and for thy maid, and for thy hired servant, and for thy stranger that sojourneth with thee, And for thy cattle, and for the beast that are in thy land, shall all the increase thereof be meat. And thou shalt number seven sabbaths of years unto thee, seven times seven years; and the space of the seven sabbaths of years shall be

20

unto thee forty and nine years. Then shalt thou cause the trumpet of the jubile to sound on the tenth day of the seventh month, in the day of atonement shall ye make the trumpet sound throughout all your land. And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubile unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family. A jubile shall that fiftieth year be unto you: ye shall not sow, neither reap that which groweth of itself in it, nor gather the grapes in it of thy vine undressed.” (Leviticus 25:1-11)

In Leviticus 25:1-11 it plainly teaches that Israel was to work the land for six years and allow it to rest on the seventh year (a sabbatical year). We know because of the wording (“Six years thou shalt sow thy field, and six years thou shalt prune thy vineyard, and gather in the fruit thereof; But in the seventh year shall be a sabbath of rest unto the land”) which is remarkably similar to the command to keep the weekly sabbath, that the Sabbatical and Jubilee years are based upon Creation week.

They were to count seven weeks of years (7 X 7 = 49) and in the 50 th year they were to declare a year of Jubilee. Weeks of years actually have nothing to do with the moon, and again the fact that there are seven weeks of consecutive years proves without doubt that “weeks” are intended to be understood as continuous cycles of time. And again, this is just another significant piece of evidence which supports the concept of the weekly cycle being continuous as opposed to broken up (supposedly by the phases of the moon).

Obviously, Leviticus 25 is describing 7 Sabbatical years with a "double sabbath" at the end. Now does the Jubilee year make it a 50 year cycle or a 49 year cycle. Here are the reasons I believe it points to a 49 year continuously repeating cycle:

1. The Sabbatical and Jubilee Cycle is Based on Creation Week. Since the Weekly Cycle generally consists of 6 days of work followed by a 7th day of rest, it only makes sense to continue the cycle of "weeks of years" without any break. While this is generally true, there are exceptions to this rule of work 6 days and rest 1 day in the various "appointed times". Therefore, the same holds true for the year of Jubilee, which would be the “exception” to the rule. So, the Jubilee year would then be the 50th year and yet it is also the 1st year of the next cycle, since the cycle remains unbroken.

2. The most direct parallel to the Jubilee cycle is the count to Pentecost. Since the count to Pentecost takes us to a 50th day and yet does not break up the cycle of our 7 day week—therefore the Jubilee cycle is the same way. It cannot break up the cycle of a 7 day week, whether made of "days" or "years."

The count to Pentecost (if it is understood as completed on the morrow after the 7th-7th day Sabbath) is a copy of the Jubilee cycle with a double sabbath at the end. And yet the count to Pentecost does not change the weekly cycle, does it? I don't think so. And I don't think the 50th year changes the cycle of "weeks of years" either—does it?

21

Therefore, the Sabbatical/Jubilee year cycles are proof positive of a continuous weekly cycle in Scripture.

Issues Arising from the Messianic Writings

8. The Day Messiah Healed Blind Man Was Probably Not a Lunar Sabbath.

In John 7 it tells us that the day was the "last great day" (meaning, last day of Tabernacles, the 22nd day). It says in John 8:1-2 that a new day came. Then in chapter 9 it says the Messiah healed a man on that same day, the Sabbath day. That day was the 23rd day of the month. But a lunar Sabbath would have to take place on the 21st (or 22nd according to other lunar sabbatarians). Therefore, the day that Yahushua healed a blind man (assuming the narrative is truly chronological) was probably not a lunar Sabbath.

I would think that the Messiah was keeping the true Sabbath. If He wasn't, and was deceived into keeping a false sabbath, then this would disqualify Him as being the Messiah—right? If this is the case, then an explanation is in order here. Those who claim the lunar sabbaths were from the beginning and replaced soon after the return of the Jews from Babylonian captivity have to answer the question of why the Messiah never rebuked the Pharisees for keeping the wrong day. Those who believe the change came after the time of the Messiah and believe the Jews (including Yahushua Messiah) were still keeping lunar sabbaths have to explain how they could have been keeping a lunar sabbath in contradiction of the plain statements from the Messianic Writings (and historical evidence, as we will show later). If (as we believe) he kept the same day as the Jews, then he could not have been a lunar sabbatarian.

It is well known among feast day keepers that the sighting of the moon establishes the start of the new month. Lunar sabbatarians also do the same to determine the start of the new week. In John 7:32 it is recorded that on the "last great day" of the Feast of Tabernacles (which always happens to fall on the 22nd day of the month) Yahushua cried out "If any man thirst, let him come unto Me, and drink!" John chapter 8:1-2 says "Yahushua went unto the mount of Olives. And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them". So the narrative of chapter 8 tells us it is the next day, which would have been the 23rd day of the month. Chapter 9 is a continuation of the events of that same day, and in chapter 9 he heals a man of blindness on the actual Sabbath: "They brought to the Pharisees him that aforetime was blind. And it was the sabbath day when Yahushua made the clay, and opened his eyes." OK, the 23rd day of the month was a Sabbath day. If the Jews (along with the Messiah) were keeping lunar sabbaths (as some are teaching) then this could not have been the lunar Sabbath, because if you go by lunar sabbaths they would have been on the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days. Some lunar sabbatarians go by 8th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th days. Either way you work it, the 23rd day of the month

22

(based on the narrative as given) was most likely a Sabbath and therefore it could not have been a lunar sabbath.6

References:

“In the last day, that great day of the feast, Yahushua stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” (John 7:37-38)

“Yahushua went unto the mount of Olives. And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.” (John 8:1-2)

“And as Yahushua passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth. And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind? Yahushua answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of Elohim should be made manifest in him.“ (John 9:1-3)

“And it was the sabbath day when Yahushua made the clay, and opened his eyes.” (John 9:14)

“Therefore said some of the Pharisees, This man is not of Elohim, because he keepeth not the sabbath day. Others said, How can a man that is a sinner do such miracles? And there was a division among them.” (John 9:16)

9. Did the Messiah Travel on a Lunar Sabbath?

In John 12 Messiah travels 6 days prior to one of the Passovers during his ministry. That would be the 8th day of the month, which is a lunar sabbath according to many lunar sabbatarians. This trip was about 14 miles long. If Yahushua kept lunar sabbaths, then He would have broken the sabbath—if this were the case.

In John 12:1 we find that 6 days before Passover Yahushua traveled a long journey to Bethany. In chapter 11 we find that he had been staying in Ephraim. That is a 14 mile journey through rough terrain. This is not a trip which an observant Jewish rabbi would take on the Sabbath.

Since it is a Scriptural certainty that Abib 14 is Passover (read Leviticus 23:4 and Numbers 28:16) and since 6 days prior to this would be Abib 8, that day could not be a

6Some lunar sabbatarians go by the conjunction moon instead of the new crescent moon. Regardless, they have the same problem here. If the Messiah were living by Torah and assuming the Torah taught conjunction moons, then it is still the wrong day.

23

Sabbath—for travel on the Sabbath was not permitted in Torah. Calculations of Passovers from the 3 years of Yahushua’s ministry indicate that Passover took place on April 28, 28 CE (a Wednesday), April 17, 29 CE (a Sunday), and April 6, 30 CE (a Thursday).7 Six days prior to these dates would be April 22, 28 CE (a Thursday), April 11, 29 CE (a Monday) and March 31, 30 CE (a Friday). None of those dates (if he traveled on them) would have been a Sabbath. And yet, according to lunar sabbatarian calculations, the Messiah would have been traveling on a lunar sabbath. Since lunar sabbaths (according to the prevalent view) would be on the 8th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th, this only adds more compelling evidence that the Jews did not observe lunar sabbaths.

References:

“Yahushua therefore walked no more openly among the [Judeans]; but went thence unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim, and there continued with his disciples. And the [Judean] Passover was nigh at hand: and many went out of the country up to Jerusalem before the Passover, to purify themselves. “ (John 11:54-55)

“Then Yahushua six days before the Passover came to Bethany, where Lazarus was which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead.” (John 12:1)

10. The Death and Resurrection of Yahushua Does Not Line Up With Lunar Sabbaths.

In regards to the season of Passover, it is a feast which is determined by the sighting of the moon in conjunction with the spring equinox. There are those who believe that the Jews at that time used a calculated calendar. However, this does not agree with the historical evidence. The calculated calendar was introduced into Judaism in the 4th century. So, we are able to determine exact days (through tracing lunar cycles back 2000 years). Since we have determined that the best option for the day and year of crucifixion was April 25, Wednesday, 31 CE—that would place the Passover on the afternoon of the 14 th. We know Messiah came out of the tomb on a “Saturday night” because it was the next morning (“first day of the week”) that Mary found the empty tomb. Therefore, the Sabbath during the feast of Passover that year was on the 17 th day of the new moon. And yet, according to lunar Sabbath doctrine, the sabbath would have to have been either on the 14th or the 15th day of that month. Therefore, based upon the crucifixion account, it is not possible to have a lunar Sabbath.

We know that there are those who believe that Messiah was crucified on a Friday, and while Friday’s are also called a “preparation day”, the statement from John 19:31 makes it clear that this was a “high sabbath” and “Passover” which they were preparing for. It 7Please see the US Naval Observatory website to make the proper calculations. http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/SpringPhenom.html to determine when the Passover was for the time of the Messiah’s crucifixion and http://aa.usno.navy.mil/ to determine the day of the week for that date.

24

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/SpringPhenom.html

was the 14th of Abib, Passover day, and the “preparation” for the sacrifice of the Passover lamb that evening and the “preparation” for the entire “Feast of Unleavened Bread.” Therefore, all the evidence we have available to us points to a Wednesday crucifixion, not a Friday crucifixion.

In Matthew 12 Yahushua tells the people that the only sign they will have is the sign of Jonah, and that like Jonah the “son of man” will be in the grave for three days and three nights. This prediction was fulfilled, and Yahushua was in the grave from Wednesday, April 25, to Saturday afternoon, April 28. A Friday crucifixion and Sunday resurrection does not allow for three days and three nights in the grave. On the first day of the week, when the Sabbath was over, Mary came to the empty tomb to find that Yahushua was already gone.

Of the 2 best options for the year of crucifixion (30 and 31 CE), the year 31 CE is the most likely year that this took place.8 (The year 33 CE is too late in the historical timeline.) This was the 14th day of the first month of the Jewish religious calendar. By going to this website you can input the dates 31 CE and April 25 to find out which day of the week it was: http://aa.usno.navy.mil/ We know that this was the correct date because the next conjunction of the moon for 31 CE (after the spring equinox) was on April 10. (Please see this link for the equinox and new moon listings under 31 CE: http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/SpringPhenom.html.) You add 1 day to April 10 to take you to the first sighting of the crescent moon (since the new moon was determined by visual sighting).9 The new moon would have been sighted on April 11.10 That makes April 12 the first day of the new moon. Add 14 days to April 11 and you have April 25, Wednesday, the date of the crucifixion and the date of Passover.

Yahushua was crucified on the 14th of Abib, a Wednesday. That was Wednesday, April 25, 31 CE. The next day would have been a “lunar sabbath” (according to most lunar sabbatarians). But it was three days later (on the evening of the 17th, a “Saturday night”) that Yahushua was resurrected. We know it was a “Saturday night” because it was on the next morning (“first day of the week”) that Mary found the empty tomb. Therefore, the Sabbath during the feast of Passover that year was on the 17th day of the new moon. And yet, according to lunar Sabbath doctrine, the sabbath would have to have been either on the 14th or the 15th day of that month. The 15 th day of Abib could not have been both a “High Sabbath” and a regular Sabbath because the various testimonies from the Messianic Writings indicate something altogether different. And when we compare that testimony to the testimony of the US Naval Observatory’s 8A crucifixion in the year 30 yields a Passover on April 6, Abib 14, and therefore a Thursday crucifixion.9There are computer programs which can be used to determined the exact phases of the moon going back over 2000 years (for example Sky Globe, by Mark Haney). They confirm that the first new moon after the equinox of 31 CE would have been sighted on April 11. That would make the following day (April 12) the first day of Abib and April 25 the 14th day of Abib, or the day of Passover.10Philo, a contemporary Jew of Yahushua’s day, writes that the new moon was determined (in his day) by sighting the visible crescent. Here is what he says: “For at the time of the new moon, the sun begins to illuminate the moon with a light which is visible to the outward senses, and then she displays her own beauty to the beholders.” The Works of Philo, translated by C. D. Yonge, Hendrickson Publishers, Peabody, MA, Foreward (by David M. Scholer), “The Special Laws, II” p. 581.

25

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/SpringPhenom.html

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/

calculations concerning the new moons of antiquity, we have no choice but to go with a Wednesday as opposed to a Friday crucifixion. Therefore, based upon the crucifixion account, it is not possible to have a lunar Sabbath.

References:

“Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” (Matthew 12:38-40)

A Friday crucifixion does not allow for the Messiah being “three days and three night” in the grave. Only a Wednesday or Thursday crucifixion allows for that, and because of the new moon calculations from the US Naval Observatory a Thursday crucifixion is also ruled out for Abib 14 that year (31 CE).

“And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar. Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified. And they took Yahushua, and led him away.” (John 19:14-16)

“The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.” (John 19:31)

Because it was dawning toward the first day of unleavened bread (the “high sabbath”) they did not have time to prepare the spices for his burial. That “high day” was a Thursday. It could not have been a reference to Friday as the preparation for the Sabbath, because John 19:14 plainly says it was the “preparation of the Passover” and that the next day (according to John 19:31) would be a “sabbath…high day”. Anyway, preparing spices and ointments for burial is a work that requires a large part of the day to accomplish. They could not have done it the next day because it was a sabbaton (or Festival Sabbath—the first day of unleavened bread). Therefore, the preparing of spices was done on the following day, a Friday (Abib 16), and they waited for the Sabbath to be completed before they came to the tomb. While that may appear like a long delay, they had no choice in the matter because of the sabbath.

“And that day was the preparation, and the sabbath drew on. And the women also, which came with him from Galilee, followed after, and beheld the sepulchre, and how his body was laid. And they returned, and

26

prepared spices and ointments; and rested the sabbath day according to the commandment.” (Luke 23:54-56)

The first “sabbath” they were speaking of here was simply the “high day” or the first day of unleavened bread. Then they came to the tomb on Friday to see how his body was laid out. That day they prepared spices and ointments and waited till after the sabbath to go and anoint his body.

“In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre. And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. His countenance was like lightning, and his raiment white as snow: And for fear of him the keepers did shake, and became as dead men. And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Yahushua, which was crucified. He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.” (Matthew 28:1-6)

This text plainly says that when the stone was rolled back it was merely to reveal that Yahushua was already gone, for he tells her plainly “He is not here.” He was resurrected at the end of the third day, and it is now the fourth day since the crucifixion, Abib 18. Remember, a lunar sabbath would have to be either on Abib 14 or 15. But the 7th day Sabbath in 31 CE was on Abib 17, which could not have been a lunar sabbath.

Issues Arising from Reference Works and Commentaries

It should be noted here that reference works and commentaries are just that—the scholarly (yet fallible) opinions of men. It is amazing to me that people will be so quick to accept so-called “scholarly opinion” while at the same time refuse to listen to the voices of those who lived much closer to or even at the time and event in question. Those who lived in ancient times and had contact with (and/or were part of) the Jewish nations would surely be able to qualify as better commentators regarding what is or is not the truth. However, such testimony is ignored or distorted to paint another picture. Nevertheless, let us examine some of this supposed scholarly “evidence” of lunar sabbaths.

11. Does The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia give us a credible witness concerning the origins of the Sabbath?

One of the first line arguments from lunar sabbatarians is a statement from this publication, where the author says “The New Moon is still, and the Sabbath originally was, dependent upon the lunar cycle.” Since the author, Max Joseph, says that the week was originally based upon the cycle of the moon, people will use this to support lunar sabbaths. And yet, what they do not tell you is that in

27

another article by the same author it states that the origins of the Sabbath are “obscure.” Based upon this testimony we have no choice but to dismiss this reference as a non-credible witness to the true origins of the Sabbath.

Let us look at what evidence some lunar sabbatarians have sought out in modern commentators and we will see how credible such commentary is. This is from the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia:

“1. Sabbath and New Moon (Rosh Hodesh), both periodically recurring in the course of the year. The New Moon is still, and the Sabbath originally was, dependent upon the lunar cycle. Both date back to the nomadic period of Israel. Originally the New Moon was celebrated in the same way as the Sabbath; gradually it became less important, while the Sabbath became more and more a day of religion and humanity, of religious meditation and instruction, or peace and delight of the soul, and produced powerful and beneficent effects outside of Judaism.”11

The author of this commentary, Max Joseph, tells us that the new moon is dependant upon the lunar cycle just as “the Sabbath originally was”. Yet he gives us no evidence to support his contention. Now this same author, in another section of that same work, makes a contradictory statement in regard to the origin of the Sabbath. He says this:

“The origin of the Sabbath is obscure.”12

It is clear that this commentary is completely unreliable as a source of credible information regarding the origins of the Sabbath. For us to use this as “proof” that the 7th day Sabbath was originally based upon the cycle of the moon would be a serious error, since the author (on the one hand) tells us that the “origin of the Sabbath is obscure” and yet speaks with confidence (on the other hand) that the Sabbath originally was based upon the “cycles of the moon” is completely out of the question.

12. Does the Babylonian (and possibly Assyrian) Custom of Keeping Something Like Lunar Sabbaths Come from the Hebrews?

The Babylonians speak of a tradition which involves the keeping of something like lunar sabbaths, called Shabbatum. Obviously, there is a connection. The question is: Is this the source of the Sabbath, or did the Babylonians pervert the institution as given in the original Creation Sabbath? Regardless of which position one takes on this issue, the simple fact is that the “scholars” were simply not there and cannot possibly hope to prove that the original weekly cycle (and therefore Sabbath) was based upon the cycles of the moon.

11The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 5, Edited by Isaac Landman, The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Inc., New York, 1941, article “Holidays,” p. 410.12The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 9, Edited by Isaac Landman, The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Inc., New York, 1943, article “Sabbath,” p. 295.

28

Notice one of the many scholarly references used by lunar sabbatarians to supposedly prove that the original sabbath was based upon the lunar cycles:

“Luni-solar calendar foundations of the Jewish calendar extend from the earliest verses of scripture. Natural, uniform motions of the heavenly spheres are the pivotal markers of time reckoning. The list of ancient characters mentioned in the Old Testament used this lunar-solar calendar system of time recording. Observation of lunar phases coupled with solar positioning graduated the lifetime ages of Adam and his descendants. . . .

“Changes in the appearance of the moon provided the seven-day week. Originating with ancient interpretations of lunar time, divisions of seven days separate the four basic lunar phases...Starting with a dark new moon, the moon gradually comes into view on following nights. In about seven days the first half of the moon is visible. The second half waxes until full moon and the end of two weeks. Lunar light reverses progression in the third week, waning to half visibility again. A fourth week completes the month, and visibility again diminishes toward a new moon. Completion of four lunar phases comprises the month.”13

And here is another scholarly statement from the Encyclopedia Biblica:

". . . the stars served to mark divisions of time. They are set in the firmament 'to divide the day from the night,' and to 'be for signs, and for moeds/signs/festivals/appointed times, and for days and years!' The Hebrew month is a lunar month and the quarter of this period—one phase of the moon—appears to have determined the week of seven days"14

Yes, the lunar sabbatarians are correct about one thing: There is a controversy among scholars over how the Sabbath came about. But please notice the ambiguity of this last scholar—“appears to have determined the week of seven days.” Do we normally base a Biblical doctrine on an ambiguous declaration of an unknown scholar? Some scholars have suggested that the Hebrews received the Sabbath from Babylon (based upon the Babylonian practice of Shabbatum) and that it was based upon the cycles of the moon. However, there are just as many scholars (or more) who are either not sure (like the author of the Encyclopedia Biblica), or confidently protest that the Jews did not get their Sabbath from Babylon at all. And this last group also does not believe the weekly cycle of Scripture was based upon the moon either. And yet, lunar sabbatarians state unequivocally that all of this is positive proof for them.

Notice what the lunar sabbatarians are teaching:

“As is wont with all humankind, the original meaning and intent of the Sabbath day, as revealed by YEHOVAH God to Adam and his

13Ages of Adam, published in 1995, by Clark K. Nelson.14Encyclopedia Biblica, The MacMillan Company (1899), P. 4780

29

descendants, became perverted after the flood and associated with pagan gods. However, the timing of these Sabbath or rest days was kept intact.”15

How could John Keyser possibly know that the perversion of the sabbath after the flood was limited to associating it with pagan gods? Of course, he couldn’t know this!! Why did they not also change the rest days so as to connect them with the worship of the moon goddess Asherah? This would explain how man began to worship Yahweh along with a female “consort” by the name of Asherah. And this would also explain how they forgot the purpose of the moon (to determine the months) and began to worship the moon instead, by keeping something like lunar sabbaths.

Let’s look at something else stated by Keyser:

“Almost all scholars today agree that the primal seven-day calendar, as used among the ancient Semites (including the Babylonians and Hebrews), was based upon the moon. Furthermore, this unique weekly cycle was observed in tandem with the lunar phases.”16

Is it true that “almost all scholars” believe that the seven-day calendar was originally based upon the moon? No it is not true. In fact, several of the very same “scholars” which Keyser quotes from have already shown that they are not absolutely certain of this. Yes, “some” scholars believe this, but certainly not “almost all.” And yet it is really immaterial how many scholars believe something, because the “scholars” simply were not there at the creation of this earth. They were not there when the children of Israel received the manna every week so as to become re-acquainted with the weekly Sabbath. All they have to go on is the evidence which they have uncovered from ancient Babylon (and a few other cultures) which suggests that there is a connection between the Babylonian Shabbatum and the Hebrew Shabbat (Sabbath). Proving a connection is one thing. Proving that both practices were the same (and therefore involved lunar sabbaths) is something quite different. For those who believe the teachings of Scripture concerning the continuous nature of the weekly cycle, it is not a difficult matter to understand. The Babylonian Shabbatum is simply a pagan perversion of the weekly cycle and the Sabbath which was given to man at Creation. To say it is proof of lunar sabbaths for Israel is beyond belief!! And it is something that even the “scholars” cannot prove, or else most of them would have been more forthright in their declarations.

Let’s look at what some other “scholars” have to say about this subject. Here is a quote from the Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible:

"In ancient Babylonia a particular day of distinctive character was known as sabbatu (sabattu) a name plainly identical with the Hebrew xxx. It was

15From Sabbath to Saturday: The Story of the Jewish Rest Day, by John D. Keyser, Hope of Israel Ministries. http://www.hope-of-israel.org/sabtosat.htm 16Ibid.

30

http://www.hope-of-israel.org/sabtosat.htm

designated specifically as the "day of quieting of the heart." The precise meaning of this expression is uncertain, but at least the concept of relaxation is implicit therein. Furthermore, the seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first, and twenty-eighth days of certain months, and not improbably of every month, and likewise the nineteenth day—i.e., the forty-ninth, the seven times seventh, day from the first day of the preceding month--were regarded as "evil days." Upon these days the physician, the oracular priests, and above all, the king might not function in any official or professional capacity whatsoever. While there is no definitive evidence that these successive seventh days were identical with the sabbatu, it is a reasonable inference that such was the case. On the basis of this evidence certain scholars have maintained that the biblical sabbath was of Babylonian origin. Such, however, is not at all the case."17

In the Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion under "Sabbath" it says regarding this issue of the "Babylonian" connection:

"SABBATH, the weekly day of rest observed from sunset on Friday until nightfall on Saturday (a period of approximately twenty-five hours). It has been suggested that the biblical Sabbath displays certain similarities to the Babylonian shappatu, but the connection is dubious."18

Here is a reference now from the Harper's Bible Dictionary under the heading for "Sabbath":

"Scholarly explanations of the Sabbath's origins have focused on certain days in the Babylonian monthly calenar on which normal activities of the king and certain professions were restricted. These days, known as "evil days," were determined by the lunar cycle, corresponding with the quarters of the moon. While the postulating of a dependence on the Babylonian calendar is tempting, it cannot be objectively sustained. The biblical Sabbath was ordained as a weekly institution with no relation whatsoever to the lunar cycle. Moreover, the somber nature of the Babylonian "evil days" stands in stark contrast to the joyous nature of the Sabbath."19

I think the point of my bringing up these references is simply to show that scholars have all kinds of opinions about all kinds of issues. Yes, the Babylonians and possibly the Assyrians had some sort of weekly cycle based upon the lunar cycles. No one is questioning this. What we are questioning is this idea that Judaism got their Sabbath ideas from the Babylonians (or the Assyrians, or anyone else for that matter). And we are also questioning this idea that the Babylonian practice of Shabbatu was the same 17Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible (Volume 4), Abington Press, Nashville, p. 135.18Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion, edited by R. J. Zwi Werblowsky and Geoffrey Wigoder, p. 595 under "Sabbath".19Harper's Bible Dictionary, editor Paul J. Achtemeier, under the heading for "Sabbath".

31

as the ancient Jewish practice of keeping Sabbath (and thereby supposedly proving lunar sabbaths). If the Babylonians have a word that is similar to the Hebrew word for Shabbat does this prove the Jews received it from them, or could it be they received it from the Jews? And assuming this word and even some aspects of the seventh-day Sabbath came from the Jews, does that mean that the Babylonians observed the Sabbath just like the Jews? Or did they pervert it by basing it on the moon? We know that they perverted it to some extent, because they were worshipping idols. So lunar sabbatarians would have us believe that they perverted only the nature of Sabbath worship, not the actual weekly cycles (supposedly based upon the moon). Is that a reasonable assumption? No, it is not. And yet, such an assumption is the basis of lunar sabbath doctrine—and it does appear to defy reason!

Friends, I can tell you for a certainty that you can right now go to your back ally and go jumping into the garbage to find food that you might possibly be able to eat—but I would not recommend it! Once the food has found its way to the garbage it may look like the original, but it is still second hand food. Likewise, a Babylonian practice of keeping sabbaths based upon the lunar cycles may "look" similar to the Jewish practice (as found in Scripture) but it by no means proves that the Babylonian practice is superior nor that it is the same practice as given in Scripture. Friends, we have to consider the "source." Ancient societies practiced human sacrifice, does this mean the Jewish sacrificial system originally came out of the practice of human sacrifice? No, it does not. And the ancient Babylonians worshipped the moon (“Asherah”) as part of their Shabbatum worship. Would this not seem to suggest that they could have also perverted the weekly cycle so as to augment their worship of the moon?

So when we look at references from "scholars" we need to consider the fact that the "scholars" were not there!! And those who follow the “scholars” blindly are really doing a spiritual form of "dumpster diving"!! Occasionally they will stumble upon little bits and pieces of "food for thought" but divorced from its original context such "food for thought" is not really all that edible. The published statements of scholars are not always based upon solid facts, and are more often than not a mixture of truth and error. The scholars just really don't know what exactly happened. Sometimes they will even admit that they don’t know by using terms such as "could be", "might be", "possibly." We need to be attuned to such ambiguous references whenever we look at what the "scholars" say, because we want to make certain that we always place the weight of evidence upon a "thus saith Yahweh" NOT a "thus saith". . . "maybe" . . . "could be" . . . from a scholar who may be basing his opinions upon theories and inconclusive evidence.

Issues Arising from History and Science

13. The Great Endurance and Universality of the Weekly Cycle.

The 7-day cycle of time we know of as a “week” had its genesis in Genesis 1-2 with the creation of this world. It is a cycle of time which cannot be determined strictly by the sighting of a heavenly sign alone. Those who study into the history of the weekly cycle have found that men throughout time and often

32

separated for many centuries by religion, by language, by culture, and by continents have continued to incorporate not only “a” weekly cycle of seven days, but the “exact” weekly cycle which we still use today. Also, no other day of the week was designated as a “sabbath” except the 7th day. In fact, most of those societies also retained the knowledge of when the 7 th day was and that it was the “Sabbath”—a day of rest.

A Chart of the Week, written by Dr. William Meade Jones, was published in 1886. In it he lists the days of the week as indicated by the 160 ancient languages of the world. Of the 160 languages and their words for the days of the week, 108 of them (two-thirds) identify the seventh day of the week as “sabbath”. [We will give the list later.]

Throughout history men in various countries have attempted to set up various calendars for determining time. The Assyrians and Babylonians even attempted to set up a weekly cycle which was based upon the moon—similar to but not exactly like the lunar sabbatarians of today. But this was limited to those in office, and did not generally include the populace at large.20 And so, the weekly cycle cannot be determined by anything other than the creation week of Genesis 1-2.

And as we use the signs in the heavens (according to Genesis 1:14) to determine the moedems, we find that there is even disagreement concerning this today (among those who seek to keep the feasts). However, while we can determine the timing of the days by the setting of the sun, the months by the moon, the weekly cycle is not determined by any visible token in the heavens.

Now regarding the basis for establishing cycles of time, Genesis 1:14 sets the pattern for the rest of the cycles:

"And Elohim said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:" (Genesis 1:14)

The daily cycle is based upon the sun as it rises and sets upon the earth. The monthly cycle is established by the moon, the yearly cycle is established by the equinoxes (both Spring and Fall) and so it also is based upon the sun. But on a larger scale Yahweh has established cycles which are only partly based upon the visible heavens, a cycle of Sabbatical years every 7 years ("weeks of years"), Jubilee Cycles every 49 years ("weeks of weeks of years"), and then finally a week of millenniums over a period of 7000 years (1000 years of 7 days each).

While it is true that a week is a period of seven days, it cannot be just any days (Exodus 20:8-11). The weekly cycle must be synchronized with the first week of Creation. Should someone decide that the week could be any period of seven days, then the Sabbath would be randomly set by the whim of man. Men could therefore redefine the

20Online Encyclopedia, Sabbath. http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/RON_SAC/SABBATH.html

33

http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/RON_SAC/SABBATH.html

week in any of a number of different ways. Even among lunar sabbatarians, there are many differences of opinion on which day the Sabbath should fall on, depending on when they start the month (waning crescent, dark moon, or visible crescent) and depending on their own interpretations (7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days or 8th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th days). There have been many attempts in the past to alter this continuous weekly cycle in some way (lunar sabbaths in Babylon, lunar quarters in Rome, 8 day weeks in Rome, 10 day weeks in Egypt, China and modern day France, etc.). All attempts to do so have been met with frustration and confusion, and the seven day week has always won out.

Admittedly, the weekly cycle is not based on any of the planetary motions. We cannot physically observe this weekly cycle (except in a few areas of science, which we will speak of shortly). This weekly cycle cannot be seen in the motions of the sun, or of the moon. Those who follow the weekly cycle do so based upon the Creation week. Each Sabbath is an important anniversary to celebrate Yahweh’s Creation of this earth and of us. Our knowledge of the weekly cycle has been handed down to us for many generations, and it has been preserved by Yahweh’s word in combination with history and the practices of Judaism.

However, it is not a strictly Jewish practice—for many other societies have also been found practicing this continuous weekly cycle. So how did the ancients who were often separated for millennia by language, culture, religion, and oceans devise a system of weekly cycles that were (generally speaking) in almost total harmony? There is a publication entitled A Chart of the Week, published in 1886 by Dr. William Meade Jones, which lists 160 ancient languages identifying the seventh day sabbath Of the 160 different languages of the world, about two-thirds of them identified the seventh-day of a seven day week with a word meaning “Sabbath” or “rest” or some other similar term. How did they know? Who told them?

If anything, the universality of the weekly cycle is (above everything else) one of the greatest evidences of a Creator and one of the best evidences in support of the inspiration of the Scriptures. Diverse people have attempted to set up different calendars throughout history, but the resilience of the weekly cycle is proof positive of a Creator.

14. Cycles of Seven in Music, Sound and Light.

The number seven is represented in nature in the form of music (sound) and light. In fact, it not only reveals the cycle of seven but it reveals it as a continuous cycle from one level to another. In music an octave is 7 whole notes leading to the final note (the 8th), which is the same note as the first—only one octave higher. In a rainbow, there are 7 colors represented. The evidence of repeating cycles of seven are clearly represented in color and sound.

According to modern scientific understanding, the number seven can be and has been found frequently in nature. For example, in music “the number of notes in the musical

34

scale”21 is equal to seven, with the eighth note being equivalent with the first note in the next octave. This alone is an interesting phenomenon, for it not only establishes the cycle of seven but it connects the cycle of seven into an ever increasing harmonic of musical heights. And since music is a product of naturally occurring sound frequencies in nature (and since sound and light both have the same source, the sun), it is therefore evidence that the basic fundamental composition of all matter is also built upon the pattern of seven. Here is how this harmonic can be illustrated in the musical scale:

21 7 (Number), Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven

35

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8/1

C D E F G A B C

Do Re Mi Fa So La Ti Do

When you connect the scale with each of the increasing octaves you have a cycle of sevens which are continuous. Notice how this is accomplished:

First Octave

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8/1

C D E F G A B C


Second Octave

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8/1

C D E F G A B C


Third Octave

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8/1

C D E F G A B C


There are various other scales besides the diatonic octave scale, however the diatonic scale is considered the basic foundation of all music.22 Another important scale is the chromatic scale which basically covers the same 8 notes of the diatonic scale (with 8 and 1 being the same note, only an octave higher). The difference between the chromatic scale and the diatonic scale is that it includes the half-notes in between each

22Exploring Scales, David Webber 1994-96. Mozart Music Generator ProgramConcise Dictionary of Music, 1986.. http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/1795/scales.htm#Eref

36

http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/1795/scales.htm#Eref

of these “whole” notes. As such, the chromatic scale contains 13 notes instead of 8. You will notice that when you subtract the final note (which is harmonically equal to the first note) you will have 7 unique notes in the diatonic scale and 12 notes in the chromatic scale. Please note that in Scripture the numbers 7 and 12 are both used frequently. And please also remember that this division of music (or sound frequencies) into 7 steps is not a product of men’s invention, but is instead the natural way in which sound is divided.

If this phenomenon takes place in regard to frequencies of music, it is not surprising that such would also take place in regards to light (for both light and sound are related). So, sure enough, this same phenomenon happens in connection with colors, for example, the colors in a rainbow. There are 7 basic colors in a rainbow. “Even though a rainbow spans a continuous spectrum of colours, traditionally the full sequence of colours is most commonly cited as red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet.”23

In an article The World of Seven, by Hillel ben David (Greg Killian), he presents an interesting case for the meaning of the number seven. While I do not agree with every assessment he makes in his article, I find it (for the most part) extremely interesting to our study of the weekly cycles. Here is just one of the comments which he makes as it relates to the spectrum of light:

23Rainbow, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow

37

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow

“Just as the seven notes in the octave can be combined into chords which harmonize music, so too can the corresponding colors be combined to form harmonious colors.

“When the colors of light are combined they form a white light. When the same colors in pigment are combined they form an earth color – brown. This teaches us that the ethereal dimension of light produces white while the physical colors of pigment return to the physical color of earth.”24

It would seem that the cycle of seven is indeed represented in nature, even though most people would not have recognized it unless they had made a close examination of the nature of light and sound. Those who would seek to change this cycle of seven based upon the cycle of the moon are not representing the way things operate in nature (as can be seen in the cycles of seven present within both sound and light). In nature, the frequency of seven is a continuous unbroken cycle.

15. Science Confirms that Cycles of Seven Exist in Nature, as a Natural Rhythm within Man and Beast.

For those who say that continual cycles of seven cannot be found in nature please consider that this is simply not true. While it is true that the sun and the moon do not establish weekly cycles, continuous cycles of seven can be found in nature through biology. It would seem that most animals (including man) have been found to contain within the very fiber of their being certain natural rhythms which follow known cycles. Some of these rhythms are about a day or a month in length. However, many of them follow a cycle of continuous weeks. As such, they are a “living” testimony to the enduring nature of the seven day week.

As if to make certain that the continuous cycle of seven would be forever implanted within the mind of man, Yahweh has placed within us natural rhythms which also follow the cycles that are presented to us in Scripture. Yes, one of those cycles involves a corresponding equivalent with the lunar cycles. However, many of these cycles are based upon cycles of seven days. The scientific field of study that is involved here is called the relatively new science of chronobiology.

“The relatively new science of chronobiology has uncovered some totally unexpected facts about living things, as Susan Perry and Jim Dawson report in their book The Secrets Our Body Clock Reveal. ‘Weekly rhythms — known in chronobiology as "circaseptan rhythms" — are one of the most puzzling and fascinating findings of chronobiology. Circaseptan literally means "about seven;" see chart. Daily and seasonal cycles appear to be connected to the moon. But what is there in nature that would have caused weekly rhythms to evolve?

24The World of Seven, by Hillel ben David (Greg Killian), http://www.betemunah.org/seven.html#_ftn1

38

http://www.betemunah.org/seven.html#_ftn1

"’At first glance, it might seem that weekly rhythms developed in response to the seven-day week imposed by human culture thousands of years ago. However, this theory doesn't hold once you realize that plants, insects, and animals other than humans also have weekly cycles. . . . Biology, therefore, not culture, is probably at the source of our seven-day week.’ (14)

“Campbell summarizes the findings of the world's foremost authority on rhythms and the pioneer of the science of chronobiology: ‘Franz Halberg proposes that body rhythms of about seven days, far from being passively driven by the social cycle of the calendar week, are innate, autonomous, and perhaps the reason why the calendar week arose in the first place.’ (15)” 25

A simple chart showing the basic circaseptan rhythms within mankind shows that we do indeed have within us a natural cycle of seven days duration (along with other important cycles). Notice what the chart demonstrates:

“There are five major rhythms that beat in our bodies to insure our health and happiness (see chart below). The daily or circadian rhythm (from the Latin for "around a day") is the easiest to detect and measure. We are born with our own set of circadian rhythms that in time become synchronized with our environment. Our rhythms vary slightly from individual to individual (23.6 hours, 24.3 hours, 25.4 hours, etc.) and they usually shorten as we age. For some unknown reason, women tend to have shorter circadian cycles than men.

Your Inner Rhythms26

Type of Rhythm

Length Examples

Ultradian Less than 24 hours

Heartbeat. 90-min. fluctuations in energy levels & attention span. Brain waves.

25God's Mysterious 7-Day Cycle in plants, animals and MAN! (Part 1) http://www.biblestudy.org/godsrest/sevencyc.html . See also references within that article, (14) Susan Perry and Jim Dawson, The Secrets Our Body Clocks Reveal, (New York: Rawson Associates, 1988), pp. 20-21 (emphasis added), and (15) Jeremy Campbell, Winston Churchill's Afternoon Nap, (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986), p. 79.26Ibid.

39

http://www.biblestudy.org/godsrest/sevencyc.html

Circadian About a day Temperature. Blood Pressure. Sleep/Wake Cycle. Cell Division.

Circaseptan About a week Reject of organ transplants. Immune response to infections. Blood & Urine chemicals. Blood Pressure. Heartbeat. Common Cold. Coping hormones.

Circatrigintan About a month Menstrual cycleCircannual About a year Seasonal depression. Sexual drive.

Susceptibility to some diseases.

Continuing with this presentation by Ken Westby, we find that it is impossible to point to religion or culture as the source of this weekly cycle. The reason that this is so is because such a cycle not only is found in man, but in plants and animals. Therefore, it is inherent even within the very nature of our existence on this earth.

“The most intriguing of all biological rhythms are those set to a clock of about seven days. In his chapter ‘The Importance of Time,’ Jeremy Campbell reports:

"’These circaseptan, or about weekly, rhythms are one of the major surprises turned up by modern chronobiology. Fifteen years ago, few scientists would have expected that seven-day biological cycles would prove to be so widespread and so long established in the living world. They are of very ancient origin, appearing in primitive one-celled organisms, and are thought to be present even in bacteria, the simplest form of life now existing.’ (20)

“One of Franz Halberg's amazing discoveries is that of an innate rhythm -- about seven days -- occurring in a giant alga some five million years old on the evolutionary time line. Because this microscopic cell resembles a graceful champagne glass, the alga (plant) is popularly known as mermaid's wineglass (Acetabularia mediterranea). When this ‘primitive’ alga is subjected to artificial schedules of alternating light and dark spans of varying length over many days, this single intact cell is somehow able to translate all that manipulation of light and darkness into the measurement of a seven-day week!

“As Campbell says, this inherent rhythm has to do with the internal logic of the body, not with the external logic of the world. Many more examples could be given. Involved experimentation with rats, face flies, plants and other life have revealed circaseptan rhythms similar to that of the mermaid's wineglass. (21)

40

“If the seven-day week is an invention of culture and religion, as most historians would have us believe, how do we explain innate circaseptan rhythms in "primitive" algae, rats, plants and face flies? These forms of life have no calendar, can't read the Torah and don't know Saturn from Santa Claus.”27

For those who seek to alter the weekly cycle based upon the moon, I would suggest that they consider what kind of effects this would have upon the human body? Just like when someone takes a night job it destroys the normal cycle of sleep (and therefore weakens their natural immune system) I believe that interrupting the weekly cycle with the phases of the moon would do something very similar to that. For the sake of their own health, it would be better for lunar sabbatarians to abandon that cycle which is contrary to their own body’s natural rhythm.

16. The Word “Sabbath” Has Been Preserved in Many Languages and Always to Designate the 7th Day Sabbath (Saturday).

The Jews have continually understood that the Sabbath falls on the day typically referred to as Saturday. In the various languages of the world has been preserved the truth of this statement. Here are examples of how Sabbath has been preserved and used exclusively to refer to the 7 th Day of the Week, as listed in the Chart of the Week:28

Language Word Location English Translation

Day Referred

ToAncient Syriac: shab-ba-tho “Sabbath” SaturdayArabic as-sabt Western Asia,

northern and western Africa:

“the Sabbath” Saturday

Arabic (ancient): shi-yar "chief or rejoicing day"

Saturday

Armenian shapat Armenia: "Sabbath" SaturdayBagrimma sibbedi Central Africa: "the Sabbath" SaturdayBornu sibda Central Africa: "Sabbath" Saturday

27God's Mysterious 7-Day Cycle in plants, animals and MAN! (Part 1) http://www.biblestudy.org/godsrest/sevencyc.html . See also references within that article, (20) Jeremy Campbell, Winston Churchill's Afternoon Nap, (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986), p. 75, and (21) Franz Halberg, "Quo Vadis Basic and Clinical Chronobiology: Promise for Health Maintenance," American Journal of Anatomy 168:543-594 (1983), pp. 569-570; Jeremy Campbell, Winston Churchill's Afternoon Nap, (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986), pp. 75-76.28A Chart of the Week, by Dr. William Meade Jones, 1886.

41

http://www.biblestudy.org/godsrest/sevencyc.html

Brdhuiky shembe Beluchistan: "Sabbath" SaturdayChaldee Syriac shaptu Kurdistan and

Urumia, Persia:"Sabbath" Saturday

Congo sabbado or Kiansbula

West equatorial Africa:

"Sabbath" Saturday

Coptic pi sabbaton Egypt: "the Sabbath" Saturday

Dayak sabtu Borneo: "Sabbath" SaturdayD'oc. French dissata Ancient and

modern:"day Sabbath" Saturday

Ethiopic san-bat Abyssinia: "Sabbath" SaturdayFalashas yini sanbat Abyssinia: "the Sabbath" SaturdayFrench samedi France: "Sabbath day" SaturdayFulfulde assebdu central Africa: "the Sabbath" SaturdayGeorgian shabati Caucasus: "Sabbath" SaturdayHausa assebatu Central Africa: "the Sabbath SaturdayHindustani shamba Muhammadan

and Hindu, India:

"Sabbath" Saturday

Ingoush shatt Caucasus: "Sabbath" SaturdayItalian sabato,

sabbatoItaly: "Sabbath" Saturday

Javanese saptoe or saptu

Java: "Sabbath" Saturday

Kabyle ghas assebt North Africa, Ancient Numidan:

"the Sabbath day" Saturday

Kazani-Tartar subbota East Russia: "Sabbath" SaturdayKurdish shamba Kurdistan: "Sabbath" SaturdayLatin sabbatum Italy: "Sabbath" SaturdayLogone se-sibde Central Africa: "the Sabbath" SaturdayMaba sab Central Africa: "Sabbath" Saturday

Makassar sattu Southern Celebes and Salayer islands:

"Sabbath" Saturday

Malagassy alsabotsy Madagascar: "the Sabbath" SaturdayMalayan hari sabtu Malaya,

Sumatra:"day Sabbath" Saturday

Maltese is-sibt Malta: "the Sabbath" SaturdayMandingo sibiti West Africa,

south of Senegal:

"the Sabbath" Saturday

Orma zam-ba-da South of Abyssiania:

"Sabbath" Saturday

42

Osmanlian yom-es-sabt Turkey: "day of the Sabbath"

Saturday

Pahlivi shambid Ancient Persian:

"pleasantest day of the week"

Saturday

Pasto shamba Afghanistan: "Sabbath" SaturdayPermian subota Russian: "Sabbath" SaturdayPersian shambah Persia: "Sabbath" SaturdayPortuguese sabbado Portugal: "Sabbath" SaturdayRoman dissapte Spain,

Catalonia:"day Sabbath" Saturday

Samaritan shab-bath Nablus, Palestine:

"Sabbath" Saturday

Spanish sabado Spain: "Sabbath" SaturdaySuanian sammtyn Caucasus: "Sabbath" SaturdaySwahili as-sabt East equatorial

Africa:"the Sabbath" Saturday

Tamashek a-hal es-sabt Atlas mountains, Africa:

"the Sabbath" Saturday

Teda essebdu Central Africa: "the Sabbath" SaturdayVotiak subbota Russian: "Sabbath" SaturdayWolof alere-asser Senegambia,

west Africa:"last day Sabbath" Saturday

By and large, the original word “Sabbath” (“shabbat” in Hebrew) has retained both its pronunciation and its meaning. In many cases they specifically identify even the day with which it is associated. For instance, in Spanish the word sabado very clearly has retained the basic sound of the original word “Shabbat” with only the sh sound being changed to an s sound as is typical for words brought into many languages. The really important thing, as it relates to this study, is that sabado specifically indicates the day of the week which is commonly known as “Saturday.” Such uniformity throughout so many languages also suggests a common origin in ancient times—as well as a uniform cycle of seven days, since the word “Sabbath” itself is related to Hebrew words which actually mean “seven.” If the original meaning of “Sabbath” was intended to point to floating sabbaths we would have found these words associated with different days of the week—or none, since it could have been any of them. And yet, this is not the way it has been throughout history and up to our own present day.

17. Four Major Witnesses Indicate that 200 Years Before the Messiah the Weekly Cycle Was Widely Understood Throughout Judea to be of a Continuous Nature, Not Based Upon the Cycles of the Moon.

The Essenes of Qumram used a 364 day calendar (52 consecutive weeks) about 200 BCE, The Book of Enoch and the Book of Jubilees both speak of the same kind of calendar, and another 364 day calendar was found in the ruins of Masada. These four witnesses prove conclusively that many Judeans were making use of

43

a 364 day calendar composed of 52 consecutive weeks, at least as early as 200 years before the advent of the Messiah.

Instead of trying to explain this to the reader, it is best that we simply quote from the sources of this information so that the reader can look up the information for themselves.

"It is clear from the scrolls recovered at Qumran (the Dead Sea scrolls) that some among the ancient Jewish sects did once adhere to a calendar of weeks. As is further explained below, there is little doubt but that a formal calendar—predicated upon an annual reckoning of 52 weeks or 364 days—was religiously used by a sect that once resided at Qumran.

"It is also clear from literature produced/circulated outside of Qumran that mainstream Judeans were quite familiar with some version of this respective calendar. For example, the use of a weekly calendar of 364 days can be recited from the 'Book of Jubilees'. A calendar of weeks can also be recited from other literature that was circulated among more mainstream Jews. Consequently, it seems probable that some kind of a calendar predicated upon the reckoning of the week was in rather widespread usage in Judea around the time of the first century.

"A study of the cited calendar of weeks reveals that the week unit (a 7-day cycle) was almost surely reckoned across long cycle segments of weeks-of-years (or 7-year cycles). Ultimately, great cycles of 7 years and 70 years appear to have been time tracked.

"The origin of this peculiar calendar of weeks may herald from the time of the Jewish kings (in the 7th century BCE). It is reasonably clear that this respective calendar may have been in use at Jerusalem at the beginning part of the 6th century BCE. Consequently, it seems possible that some version of a calendar predicated upon weeks-of-days and weeks-of-years was used in the environs of Jerusalem throughout the Second-Temple Era.

"What is remarkable is that the epoch of the solar year can almost perfectly be determined through a simple method of reckoning weeks-of-days across weeks-of-years. As such, it is possible that early astronomers at Jerusalem were quite capable of precisely defining the limits of the solar year (in average time).”29

While there are some who would attempt to make the Dead Sea Scrolls prove lunar sabbaths, the truth does not line up with this theory. The Qumram community were generally keeping a 364 day solar calendar, although it is possible they were also aware of the lunar cycles (since lunar cycle observations were also found at Qumram). For

29The Significance Of 70 Years, by James Dyer, http://www.creation-answers.com/seventy.htm

44

http://www.creation-answers.com/seventy.htm

those willing to “do the math” 364 days is evenly divided by 7. Even if the Essenes of Qumram were keeping a "lunar-solar calendar" I have to say that this proves nothing, because a "lunar-solar calendar" does not prove lunar sabbaths. It only proves that people kept track of the monthly cycle based upon the moon. And while it is true that some kept the 364 day calendar exclusively—it is more likely that many kept the 364 day calendar in conjunction with the "lunar-solar calendar".

Please notice now some actual references from the Qumram Scrolls which in various ways point to the practice of a continual weekly cycle:

"And the year is complete - three hundred and si[xty-four] days"30

"On that day, Noah went out of the ark at the end of a complete year of three hundred and sixty four days, on the first (day) of the week... "31

"... concerning the ages made by God, all the ages for the accomplishment of all the events, past and future. Before ever He created them, He determined the works of... age by age. And it was the order of the creation of man from Noah to Abraham, until he begot Isaac; ten weeks of years"32

This is very interesting. Here we have three of the Dead Sea Scrolls which support the continuous weekly cycle. Could there be more? Based on the information I have, there are actually seven manuscripts from the Dead Sea Scrolls which shows that the Qumram community were keeping a continuous weekly cycle of 52 weeks per year: 4Q180, 4Q252, 4QMMT, 4Q325, 4Q326, 4Q327, and 4Q394.

Along with these scrolls found at Qumram, they also found fragments from the books of Enoch and Jubilees. What do these books give as a definition of a yearly cycle (as it supports the continuous nature of the weekly cycle)? Please notice first what is written in the book of Enoch:

"... Four [seasons]... divide the four portions of the year... they belong to the reckoning of the year... one [seasonal division] in the first portal and one in the third, and one in the fourth and one in the sixth, and the year is completed in three hundred and sixty-four days." ('Enoch', Chapter 82:4-6, translated by R.H. Charles).

"... the exactness of the year is accomplished through its separate three hundred and sixty-four stations." ('Enoch', Chapter 75: 2-3, translated by R.H. Charles).

30Scroll 4QMMT, lines 20-21, refer to 'Calendars In The Dead Sea Scrolls: Measuring Time', by Vanderkam, P. 6531Ibid., from Scroll 4Q252 2:2-3.32From 4Q180, translation borrowed from 'The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls In English', Vermes, p. 520.

45

"And in those days, if five years are taken together, the sun has thirty superabundant days; and all the days which belong to him for one of these five years, when they are full, are three hundred and sixty-four days." ('Enoch', Chapter 74: 10, translated by R.H. Charles).

"Happy are all the just, happy all those who walk in the paths of justice and have no sin like the sinners, in the counting of all their days, in which the sun goes through the heavens, entering and departing from the gates, each time thirty times, together with the heads of the thousands of this order of the stars, together with the four that are added and separate between the four portions of the year, which they lead and enter with them four days. And on their account men will be at fault, and will not count them in the reckoning of the whole world; but men will be mistaken and will not know them exactly. For they belong to the reckoning of the year and are exactly marked forever, one in the first portal and one in the third and one in the fourth and one in the sixth, and the year is completed in three hundred and sixty-four days. And the account of it is true, and the marked reckoning exact; for the luminaries and the months and the festivals and the years have been shown and given me by Uriel, to whom the Lord of all creation had given command, in reference to me, of the host of the heavens." ('Enoch', Chapter 82: 4-7, translated by R.H. Charles).

The book of Jubilees also give us the same understanding of the cycle of the year being 364 days (exactly 52 consecutive weeks). In fact, it even defines the Jubilee cycles as 49 year cycles as well:

"And command thou the children of Israel that they observe the years according to this reckoning- three hundred and sixty-four days, and (these) will constitute a complete year, and they will not disturb its time from its days and from its feasts; for everything will fall out in them according to their testimony, and they will not leave out any day nor disturb any feasts." (Jubilees 6:32-33)

"Each one of them is thirteen weeks from one to another of the remembrances, from the 1st to the second, and from the second to the third, and from the third to the fourth, and all the days which will be commanded will be fifty-two weeks of days, all of them are a complete year." (Jubilees 6:29)

Three clear and unmistakable references which show an unbroken cycle of 7 year weeks, cycles which extend beyond the 49 years (or 7 weeks) leading up to the year of Jubilee—as shown in the Book of Jubilees

46

" . . . And then spake Jacob to Rebecca, his mother, and said unto her: 'Behold, mother, I am nine weeks of years old, and I neither know nor have I touched any woman, nor have I betrothed myself to any, nor even think of taking me a wife of the daughters of Canaan. For I remember, mother, the words of Abraham, our father, for he commanded me not to take a wife of the daughters of Canaan, but to take me a wife from the seed of my father's house and from my kindred. I have heard before that daughters have been born to Laban, thy brother, and I have set my heart on them " (Jubilees 25:4-6)

My Comments: 7 weeks is the limit of a cycle of less than 50 years. 9 weeks is in excess of that, but no mention of an additional year to cover the year of Jubilee. Again, this shows continual weeks of years extending beyond the four weeks which would be found in a lunar month, and also showing that the Jubilee year was considered the first year of the next cycle.

". . . And Isaac slept on his bed that day rejoicing; and he slept the eternal sleep, and died one hundred and eighty years old. He completed twenty-five weeks and five years;" (Jubilees 36:18)

My Comments: 25 X 7 = 175 // 175 + 5 = 180 No question, this is over 3 jubilees long and the count of years confirms that an extra 50th year is not in the count (showing that the 50th year was included within the 49 year cycle). Again, this supports a continuous weekly cycle (of years).

" . . . And Joseph took of the corn of the harvest the fifth part for the king and left four parts for them for food and for seed, and Joseph made it an ordinance for the land of Egypt until this day. And Israel lived in the land of Egypt seventeen years, and all the days which he lived were three jubilees, one hundred and forty-seven years, and he died in the fourth [2188 A.M.] 14 year of the fifth week of the forty-fifth jubilee. . . . (Jubilees 45:12-14)

My Comments: 3 X 49 = 147, exactly 3 Jubilee cycles. The numbers from Jubilees add up exactly, and show 21 continuous weekly cycles (of years).

This is what I found in my search of Jubilees. There is probably more evidence that I have yet to find. No question about it, the book of Jubilees confirms that from about the time the book was written (about 150 BCE) it was a general understanding that the sabbatical/jubilee years were a repeating cycle of 49 years, the jubilee year being the 1st year of the next cycle. It also, because of its mention of a 364 day year, proves that it was commonly believed that the weekly cycle was a repeating cycle of 52 consecutive weeks per year.

47

Now there are those who will say that Jubilees and Enoch are not Scripture. While I agree that they are probably not Scripture, that does not mean they do not contain certain elements of inspiration. They were even considered important by the Apostles of Yahushua and many other Jews. And since these books were widely read and used in Judea at that time, we have to at least consider them a valuable contributor to our understanding of Jewish history and culture.

Please consider the evidence of just how important the Book of Enoch was to the Apostles. Notice what is written in Enoch:

"And behold, he comes with myriads of the holy to pass judgment upon them, and will destroy the impious, and will call to account all flesh for everything the sinners and the impious have done and committed against him." (Enoch 2:9)

Does this sound familiar? It should! Look what it says in the book of Jude:

"And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him." (Jude 1:14-15)

Did the author of Jude consider the Book of Enoch to be important? Obviously! Did he consider it to be inspired? It is a possibility!

The Qumram Scrolls and the books of Jubilee and Enoch are not the only places that a continuous weekly cycle are taught (as part of a 52 week, 364 day yearly cycle) but they were also found in the fortress of Masada. Please note this reference to that discovery:

"Parts of 14 biblical, apocryphal and sectarian scrolls found at Masada are the first scrolls discovered outside of caves in a dated archaeological stratum. The biblical scrolls are mostly identical with Masoretic texts but some show slight variations. One important find was a sectarian document identical with one found in Qumran, and using a 364-day calendar used also by a Dead Sea Sect. This was a proof that the Dead Sea Scrolls were dated correctly."33

A yearly count of 364 days is specifically mentioned not only in the Dead Sea Scrolls of Qumran, but are also found in the books of Enoch and Jubilees, as well as documents discovered in the ruins of Masada. Evidently, the use of a solar-based calendar of 364 days in a year was well known in Judea at the time of the Messiah. To suggest that this

33Temple Models, http://www.yahrzeit.org/text_link/masada_text/textpage97.htm

48

http://www.yahrzeit.org/text_link/masada_text/textpage97.htm

was part of a plan to "phase out" a supposed lunar calculation of the weeks is totally without warrant. It proves conclusively that the continuous, uninterrupted, weekly cycle was well known as far back as 200 years before the advent of the Messiah.

Now some will say that even though the Book of Jubilees and the Book of Enoch were found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, this fact does not prove that they were widely read by the people of Judea. Were these merely the writings of an eccentric Essene Jew whose obscure work was found by modern researchers, preserved in a cave? Well, we do have evidence that these books were indeed widely read by Judeans (at least, by the time of the apostles in the first century CE). Please review the evidence for yourselves: First, let’s establish the context from which the Book of Jubilees comes from. Here is a statement from an online study of the book of Jubilees:

“Given the fact that at least fourteen copies of it have been identified from the Qumran caves, it is clear that the Book of Jubilees was a popular and probably authoritative text for the community, which implies that the sectarians took seriously the text’s claim to be divine revelation mediated to Moses by the angel of the presence.”34

This statement (among many others I could have quoted) shows that Jubilees was an important book for the Qumram community, and may even have been authored by one of its members (although this cannot be proven conclusively). But does this mean that the Essenes of Qumram were the only group that knew of that book? Wikepedia gives more background information on that book which clearly indicates that it was more widely read than just in the Qumram community:

"The Book of Jubilees . . . sometimes called the Lesser Genesis (Leptogenesis), is an ancient Jewish religious work. It was well known to Early Christian writers in the East and the West. Later it was so thoroughly suppressed that no complete Greek or Latin version has survived. It was once part of the Jewish midrash, and is still considered canonical for the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, where it is known as the "Book of Division" (Ge'ez:Mets'hafe Kufale); it is considered pseudepigraphal by most Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox Christians. In the modern scholarly view, it reworks material found in the Biblical books of Genesis and Exodus in the light of traditionalist concerns of some 2nd century BC Jews. . . . .

"The book was evidently held in high regard by the Early Church Fathers of the Christian Church. However, the Jewish Sanhedrin declared it and several other books to be no longer included in the Hebrew Bible at the Council of Jamnia, ca. 85 AD."35

34 http://www.abu.nb.ca/Courses/NTIntro/InTest/Jubilees.htm 35The Book of Jubilees, Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilees

49

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilees

http://www.abu.nb.ca/Courses/NTIntro/InTest/Jubilees.htm

If Jubilees had not been widely known, it would not have been necessary for the Jewish Sanhedrin to declare it “to be no longer included” within the Hebrew Scriptures in the year 85 CE. Thus, regardless of how Jubilees is viewed, it evidently had been well known enough that there was a dispute over its inclusion within the canon of Scripture. Such fights don’t normally occur over books which are not widely known and read.

I believe that the idea that Jubilees was an obscure book from the ancient past is reinforced by the fact that once it was suppressed most copies of it were destroyed, few people knew about it, and few copies of it were ever found. However, fragments have been found in Greek, Hebrew and a complete text in Ethiopic. There is a reference to the book in Syriac also, suggesting it may have been translated into Syriac as well. Such a wide assortment of translations into many different languages is not normally the product of an obscure writing.

One more point which needs to be presented is the fact that a reference to Jubilees can even be found in the writings of the apostle Peter. So let's look at a statement from Jubilees which just happens to also deal with our topic:

"And at the close of the nineteenth jubilee, in the seventh week in the sixth year thereof, Adam died, and all his sons buried him in the land of his creation, and he was the first to be buried in the earth. And he lacked seventy years of one thousand years; for one thousand years are as one day in the testimony of the heavens and therefore was it written concerning the tree of knowledge: 'On the day that ye eat thereof ye shall die.'" (Jubilees 4:29)

Adam dies (according to the author of Jubliees) near the end of 19 Jubilees. Scripture confirms that this was 930 years. 19 Jubilees using a count of 50 years per cycle would be almost 950 years, not 930. And yet, by using a 49-year cycle it is much more in line with what Scripture teaches. Adam lived 930 years and so it is obvious he died in his 931st year, just as you would calculate the life of any other person today. 931 years is exactly 19 Jubilees using 49-year cycles—confirming once again that it uses a continuous weekly cycle. But another important statement here is where we find that "one thousand years are as one day." Where else is such a statement recorded?

"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with [Yahweh] as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." (2 Peter 3:8)

If Peter does not wish us to be "ignorant" of the fact that a thousand years are as a day, then isn't he telling us that he does not want us to be ignorant of what the Book of Jubilees says? Doesn't this give the Book of Jubilees much more weight of authority in our minds than before? It should! While we can rightly question the "inspiration" of Jubilees and Enoch, we have to admit that since they are given authority in the minds of the Apostles—they must be important for us to study and understand. The authors of the books of Jubilees and Enoch could not have been lunar sabbatarians, and yet their

50

books were so widely read that they were considered by some Judeans to even be part of Scripture—at least as late as the year 85 CE.

18. The History of the Conflict Between Sunday Keeping and Sabbath Keeping Shows that Sabbath Has Always Been Understood to Mean the Day Commonly Called “Saturday”.

The early believers in Messiah kept the sabbath day, as is attested to by countless historical documents. When the time came for Sunday keeping to be introduced, the conflict was very obviously a conflict between a 7 th day Sabbath (on Saturday) and the “Lord’s Day” (1st day, on Sunday). In no place is there any record of a conflict between Sunday and a floating sabbath, nor is there any record of a conflict between Saturday and a floating sabbath. On that issue history is silent. But history is full of detailed information about the conflict over the 7th day Sabbath verses the 1st day festival to Sol Invictus.

Socrates Scholasticus, 440 C.E.:"For although almost all churches throughout The World celebrated the sacred mysteries on the Sabbath of every week, yet the Christians of Alexandria and at Rome, on account of some ancient tradition, refuse to do this." [Footnote on “Sabbath”: "That is, upon the Saturday. It should be observed, that Sunday is never called "the Sabbath' by the ancient Fathers and historians."]36

We should add that by this time the Christians were also keeping the day of the Sun as a special festival day, for it was about 2-3 centuries prior to this that Sunday began to be observed by the Christians. Those who lived in Alexandria, Egypt and Rome had “ceased” to keep the Sabbath. That means that they at one time were indeed keeping the Sabbath. While it doesn’t identify directly what the “Sabbath” day is (except as is obviously inferred by the use of the word Sabbath, and as indicated in the footnote—i.e., the Jewish Sabbath [Saturday]) it DOES identify the frequency of its being kept and the cycle that is being used. “every” tells us it is a repeating event, “week” tells us it is the typical 7 day week which has survived to this day from ancient times.

Sozomen, 443-450 C.E."The people of Constantinople, and almost everywhere, assemble together on the sabbath, as well as on the first day of the week, which custom is never observed at Rome or Alexandria (7:19)."37

The context of this statement plainly reveals that “sabbath” is kept in contrast to “the first day” and that both of them are a part of that cycle of time called a “week”.

36Socrates, "Ecclestical History," Book 5, chap. 22, p. 289.37Socrates, "Ecclesiastical History," Book 7, chap.19.

51

Those who propose the lunar sabbath teaching not only have no scriptural basis for their beliefs (as has been shown) but their belief also lacks historical foundation.38 The only ways they can convince people to accept this lunar sabbath doctrine is to either “re-write history” or convince people to ignore the testimony of history based upon the faulty extreme understanding of “Scripture Only”. The rally cry of the Protestant Reformation was “Scripture and Scripture Alone”—but the objective of that theme was to rid them of doctrines which came from the traditions of man. Now the lunar sabbatarian has turned that rally cry on it’s head by introducing faulty logic and distorted Scripture references. The result is that they do the very thing which they profess not to do! They have introduced a tradition and doctrine of man, while claiming it is based on Scripture. Once they have their followers almost convinced with their many words, then they put the seal on their doctrine by declaring that they must use “Scripture and Scripture Alone” and so therefore they must consider all history as being unreliable. They either will not use any history to help them find the truth of the true sabbath, or they will allow only certain statements from history and pervert the meaning of other historical documents to support their strange views. And yet they end up taking the word of some modern day teacher to tell them that the weekly cycle we have now is completely of pagan origin. What blindness!! While it is true that history contains its own share of distortions, mistranslations and even outright lies—for the true student of Scripture it still has an important role in his study of the Word, provided it is used to augment (not supercede) his fundamental use of Scripture.

19. If we assume that the Jews were keeping lunar sabbaths at the time of Messiah, the question we have to ask is "when did it change?" And, "how did it change?"

All of the historical evidence we have available to us shows that the Jews kept the Sabbath on the day the Romans call "Saturns day", and in the following centuries when the Sabbath was replaced with Sunday, it is always clearly indicating that this "Sunday" was the day after the Jewish Sabbath.

If there were a change in the Sabbath, such a change would have produced a controversy. The only "controversy" regarding the Sabbath mentioned in history is in regard to the debate between keeping the 7th day sabbath and the "lord's day" (Sunday). For those who say "show the evidence of when the Jews stopped keeping the new moon as a 'special sabbath,'" please realize that there is no record of that because the "new moon" was not kept as a Sabbath (except for the new moon of the 7th month).

In ancient times travel was slow so once people arrived in a location they tended to stay there a long period. Those who became isolated would tend to hold onto many of their ancient beliefs a long time. Thus we would expect to find lunar sabbaths being observed by those groups of Israelites who were dispersed through the nations.

38A good website to go to for historical information regarding the continuous nature of the 7 th day Sabbath, please go to Sabbath Truth at http://www.sabbathtruth.com/history/sabbath_history5.asp

52

http://www.sabbathtruth.com/history/sabbath_history5.asp

However, in not even a single instance can we find any group of ancient Jews (or lost Israelites) who kept lunar sabbaths. Instead, they were often found keeping the 7th day Sabbath.

As if that were not enough, we must consider the fact that most of the lunar sabbatarians believe that the Messiah (along with the rest of the Jews living at that time) kept lunar sabbaths. If this were the case, then why is it that we do not have ANY historical evidence that the Jews living then switched from keeping lunar sabbaths to the regular weekly Sabbath? The answer is simple: the Jews never kept lunar sabbaths!

Let us consider the deep ramifications of such a scenario—that the Jews suddenly abandoned lunar sabbaths for a weekly Sabbath. Lunar sabbatarians have to believe that all Jews throughout the world lost track of the true “lunar sabbath”. Where are the truehearted believers who continued to keep the lunar sabbaths? Where is their testimony? What of those who were isolated from the rest of the world? Why is it that these isolated Jews continued to keep the 7th day weekly Sabbath, instead of lunar sabbaths? And where is the documentation that lunar sabbaths were changed? Answer: there is no documentation of lunar sabbaths (among the Jews) nor of any change.

Now when faced with such overwhelming evidence of Jews (and Christians, and Messianic groups) who continued to keep the 7th day Sabbath, the lunar sabbatarian has no choice but to invoke the argument that history has been completely re-written, much of the evidence has been destroyed or altered, and therefore that is why the evidence is lacking. It is true that throughout history attempts have been made (and continue to be made) to suppress and or alter the truth of various events. But along with this attempt to suppress “truth” there has always been a faithful witness somewhere attesting to what the truth is. In fact, there have been many faithful witnesses who were willing to die for what they believed! Yet, the lunar sabbatarian searches in vain through countless historical documents to find not one single shred of historical evidence of the keeping of lunar sabbaths by either the Jews or the Christians. It is simply not there and therefore this excuse that history (and/or Scripture) has been altered is simply without merit.

Even though there is no evidence of lunar sabbaths being kept in ancient times (except possibly in Babylon and Assyria), and ABSOLUTELY NO HISTORICAL EVIDENCE AT ALL that the Jews ever kept lunar sabbaths, the lunar sabbatarian will argue that in time the evidence will be found and their belief in keeping lunar sabbaths will be vindicated. They tend to believe that the history of lunar sabbaths has been almost completely destroyed. Please notice what one prominent lunar sabbatarian has proposed along these lines:

“I might also add that I believe more historical information will be forthcoming but I also believe that much historical proof of a lunar

53

reckoning has been destroyed to hide the truth and further the deceitful schemes Satan has devised many ways to keep us from walking Yahweh’s way of truth and light.”39

It is true that Satan has attempted to deceive the very elect in these last days (and even throughout history). But Yahweh has set a limit to his power to deceive and will not allow every single piece of historical evidence concerning truth to be altered or destroyed—not without a faithful witness to preserve at least some of it. And yet, many lunar sabbatarians would have us believe that ALL historical evidence (except, of course, historical evidence which supports their teaching) is unreliable.

Is there some historical record (any record will suffice) that the “true” Sabbath of Yahweh has been lost by the Jews? We need to see an official, historically documented, record of that change. Lunar sabbatarians do not have such a document and therefore their argument that we should be keeping lunar sabbaths is completely without merit.

20. Jewish Historian Josephus Testifies of Continuous Weekly Cycle.

According to Josephus, an historian only a few decades after the time of the Messiah, the Jews kept the Sabbath (like Sabbatical years) in a repeating cycle consisting of 7 days. Here is the quote, from The Wars of the Jews:

"And as the siege was delayed by this means, the year of rest came on, upon which the Jews rest every seventh year as they do on every seventh day."40

Do we just ignore all of this evidence or do we humble ourselves as Yahweh has revealed His truth to us in His word?

21. Jewish Historian Philo Testifies of Continuous Weekly Cycle.

“It [number seven] was also greatly honoured by Moses, a man much attached to excellence of all sorts, who described its beauty on the most holy pillars of the law, and wrote it in the hearts of all those who were subject to him, commanding them at the end of each period of six days to keep the seventh holy; abstaining from all other works which are done in the seeking after and providing the means of life, devoting that day to the single object of philosophizing with a view to the improvement of their morals, and the examinations of their consciences.”41

39From The Burning Question: Sabbath – When is it? by Ernie L. Hoch, 1/18/2002,http://www.yahwehmusic.com/covenants/burningquestion.htm , pp. 2, 10.40Josephus, The Wars of the Jews, Book I, ch. 2, sect. 4: 41Cf., The Works of Philo, translated by C. D. Yonge, Hendrickson Publishers, Peabody, MA, “On the Creation,” XLIII, sect. 128, p. 18.

54

http://www.yahwehmusic.com/covenants/burningquestion.htm

Conclusion: Lunar Sabbaths are a Deception

In these last days, Satan is working with all power and lying wonders to deceive (if possible) the very elect (Matthew 24:24). His great desire is to cause those who have already placed themselves under “the sign of the covenant” (which is the Sabbath) to become confused about that “sign” and turn away from that covenant. If he cannot get them to keep “Sunday” in place of the true 7 th day Sabbath, then He will be just as satisfied to have them turn to “floating sabbaths” (as taught by lunar sabbatarians).

Are lunar sabbaths clearly taught in Scripture? No, they are not. And yet the Torah clearly shows that Yahweh does not have a problem telling us EXACTLY what He expects of us in many different areas, as well as EXACTLY what punishment we will receive for not doing as we are commanded. In Leviticus 18, for example, Torah explicitly lists in ever so precise detail exactly what sexual relations we can or cannot engage in (no relations with a sister, mother, step-mother, another male, animals, menstruating women, married woman, etc.). Where are the precise, exact, legislations in regard to keeping lunar sabbaths? I know of none.

Is there anyplace in Scripture where it plainly says that the weekly cycle must be patterned after the sun or moon? If lunar sabbaths are truly based upon Scripture, would we have to search all over Scripture to find even a glimmer of a hint of lunar sabbaths? When something that is simple (like the continuous weekly cycle) is made to become complicated (with lunar sabbaths) then the implication of such a system is that it is a serious mistake. It is Satan who has complicated our lives on this earth, not Yahweh. Some lunar sabbatarians will reluctantly admit that this “truth” of lunar sabbaths is not so plainly presented in Scripture, therefore they have to "dig deep" to find the supposed "truth" of lunar sabbaths. The point of my whole presentation here is that if lunar sabbaths were not really plainly presented (whether true or not), then we would have no sin for not keeping lunar sabbaths.

The Messiah once said when addressing a question from the Pharisees. As it is written in John 9:40-41:

"And some of the Pharisees which were with him heard these words, and said unto him, Are we blind also? Yahushua said unto him, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin; but now ye say, We see, therefore your sin remaineth."

One thing which I have noticed among most of those who advocate the lunar sabbath doctrine is that they are often spiritually intolerant of those who insist on keeping the 7 th

day Sabbath. They believe that they “see”, and readily accuse others who do not agree

55

with them of blindness. They may even accuse us of the “rejection of the holy spirit.” While I do not "know it all” (as I have also been accused) I am just as capable of being in error as anyone else. So, if lunar sabbaths were based upon Scripture, and I could have clear and convincing statements upon which to build my faith, I would be among the first to adopt the keeping of them—regardless of the financial, social, political, or even physical consequences of such a decision.

The typical explanation of why lunar sabbaths are not clearly spelled out in Scripture is because it is a “hidden” message (a great secret) which is only to be revealed to the “vessels of honor.” But let us suppose (as lunar sabbatarians would have us believe) that this doctrine is some sort of “mystery” which only the righteous can come to see and accept. And let us presume (as some would have us do) that it is a sin to keep the Sabbath without regard to the cycle of the moon (while Yahweh does not appear to plainly teach this in the Torah). Well then, the words of Messiah written above are just as valid for me as well: If we are "blind" then we truly have no sin! If we are blind to this teaching (and should it prove to be true after all), then our blindness is not because of unbelief or rejection of the plain teachings of Scripture. If we are “blind” for keeping continuous weekly 7th day Sabbaths (assuming that lunar sabbaths are the correct ones to keep) then our blindness cannot be a source of condemnation. If it is true that Yahweh intended to keep this lunar sabbath issue a secret from us, then not only are we blameless, but the character of Yahweh could be called into question.

We have covered this subject in detail and have found that lunar sabbaths are not based upon Scripture. Yahweh does not wish us to be ignorant of truths which are of a salvational nature. That is why He has given to us HIS Word, so that we will be without excuse. Therefore, He does not and would not play games with us on a subject as important as which day we should keep as the Sabbath. If the Sabbath were to be based upon the cycles of the moon, Yahweh should have plainly said so in HIS Word. But He doesn’t, and instead gives us plenty of evidence to show that the weekly cycle is a continuous cycle of 7 days per week over a period of consecutive weeks. Of course, the truth of the matter is that Yahweh does tell us about the true Sabbath. He tells us of seven continuous weeks leading to Pentecost. He tells us of seven continuous weeks of years leading to the year of Jubilee. He gave the Israelites manna for 40 years, 6 days of manna and none on the seventh, with not the slightest hint that such a cycle was to be interrupted by the new moon during those 40 years. The true sabbath is a celebration to commemorate the creation week, and therefore does not need to have the moon to determine its cycle. Genesis 2 plainly tells us what the weekly cycle is based upon:

“And on the seventh day Elohim ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And Elohim blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which Elohim created and made.” (Genesis 2:2-3)

56

And the book of Hebrews places this issue in its proper perspective, as it plainly tells us the reason for the Sabbath—that it was to give us rest so that we could enter into His rest. Those who follow lunar sabbaths cannot truly enter into this rest, for they disrupt that rest by changing the day of rest every month. How can one enter into Yahweh’s rest if they must alter the cycle of rest every month?

“For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And Elohim did rest the seventh day from all his works. And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest. Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief: Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts. For if Yahushua had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of Elohim. For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as Elohim did from his. Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief. For the word of Elohim is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” (Hebrews 4:4-12)

At the time that Hebrews was written, the book of Jubilees was a most popular writing (as we have previously discovered in this article)—popularly considered by many even to be part of the canon of Scripture. I do not believe Jubilees is part of the canon of Scripture, but the point is it would have been well known at that time. In the book of Jubilees the continuous nature of the week was clearly established with a 52 continuous week year composed of 364 days per year—yet none of the Jewish Rabbis of that time rejected it because of their supposed lunar sabbaths being challenged by a 52 week continuous cycle. Therefore, we have both a Scriptural and historical foundation for knowing that the continuous weekly Sabbath was known and being kept at the time of Messiah Yahushua. Therefore {according to Hebrews) for those who continue to remain steadfast in their keeping of the continuous weekly Sabbath, Yahushua has indeed given them rest. He has not therefore “afterward. . . spoken of another day”—whether it be the “sol invictus” ("the undefeated Sun" or Sunday) or lunar sabbaths.

57

50 Solid Reasons Why Believers Should Reject the Doctrine ...ponderscripture.org/Word Docs/In Search...

Documents

Transcript of 50 Solid Reasons Why Believers Should Reject the Doctrine ...ponderscripture.org/Word Docs/In Search...