«5> - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileINITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HO ... TR2...

\\«5>

CJLJ) oilvy QV3H ohnvyqAH NI

TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOdlC TEST RESULTS

WELL ED24TESTNO. 20

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

300.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT45.10 FTBGS TO 59.5062.20 FTBGS TO 300.006.40 FTBGS TO 42.40

4.00 FT.396.70 FT MSL392.70 FT MSL

10.40 FEET BELOW TOC386.30 FTMSL .

386.88 FT367.27 FT19.61 FTNA FTNA FT

6.07 MINNA MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

^

I

• - , ' • - /

SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.76 ' ,1.63

178.00 SEC 178.00Ifl6iiiiCM/S 1.62E-04

SECCM/S

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSI?

AVERAGE FLOW RATECKHYDRAUUC HEAD) / dlLOG (T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA CM/S

AR305802Golder Associates .

CLJ) onvy QV3H onnvyaAH NT• AR30580-3-

TABLE 1 . . . . ' . -SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOG1C TEST RESULTS

WELLTESTNO. (

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER

LENGTHTESTEDRANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY


DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATEH ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAULIC HEAD AT BEGINNING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT BEGINNING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINNING OF SLUG TEST C;T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINNING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)

' s

ED27 . • . ' . .i • ' •.

£55 INCH3.70 INCH

20aOO FTBGS

14.40 FT173.10 FT BG3T 137.50 FTBGS190.20 FTBGS T 200.00 FTBGS•2.60 FTBG3T 170.40 FTBGS

14.00 FT451.30 FTMSL437.30 FTMSL

11,40 FEETBELOWTOC439.90 FTMSL

443.24 FT452.70 FT9.48 FTNA FTNA FT

37.27 MINNA MIN

^ / ' *


(Hi-H1)/(H!-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCnvnY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.09 • 1.08

984.00 SEC 984.00 SEC•P CM/S a2E-06 CM/3

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNEH ANALYSIS,

AVERAGE FLOW RATEaXHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY ' : ' '

NA GPMNANA

Oolder Associates

M.0. 0

CO

21'l IIP I

o

(1J) OI1VW OV3H OnnVUOJkH NT .

AR305805

TABLE 1 .SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGJC TEST RESULTS

WELL ,TESTNO. •


LENGTHTESTED •, .DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY

STICK-UP 'TOP OF CASINO ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGIN1NQ OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos) "HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t;T-0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T - 0)

ED273 . ' • ; • ' • '

2.55 INCH3.70 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT142.10 FTBG3T 156.50159.20 FTBG3T 200.00-0.50 FTBG3T 139.40

1Z50 FT449.80 FTMSL,437.30 FTMSL

1ZOO FEET BELOW TOO437.80 FTMSL

449.90 FT428.25 FT21.65 FT443.61 FT15.38 FT

87.20 MIN91.87 MIN .

' '.

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

*

' ' • • • ' ' • ' • '/SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(H!-Hiy(H!-H2)(T2-T1)x60 .HYDRAULIC CONDUCnvrTY

TR2DATA TR4DATAail 3.37

268.00 SEC • 268.00mZmmCMJB 2.7E-04

SECCM/S

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.

AVERAGE FLOW RATE , ' .d(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOQ (T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

.0.87 GPM15

3.51E-04

OoldetAMoctates AR305806

I I I I I I• I « « « « «

• ; >

otivd ov3H onnvaoAH NT

AR305807

OLJ

LoJ

LJ

3in

00 tC£ ,-LJ d

o

Q

(D•

LU*|.. - .|TI X I QQ

I I J __l_ I I • I————I

T.

d

I

I

CM

CM

i r 1 -i i i i r 3 if(JJ) OV3H

AR305808

TABLE 1 .SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELLTESTNO.


LENGTHTESTED .DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY •ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY

STICK-UP .TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION '


INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HI) ' 'HYDRAUUC HEAD AT BEGINNING OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT BEGINNING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINNING OF SLUG TEST G;T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINNING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)

ED274 . . ' ' ' . • ' " • ' ' .

2.55 INCH3.70 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT157.00 FTBGS T 171.40 FTBGS174.10 FTBGST 200.00 FTBGS-0.50 FTBGST 154.30 FTBGS

4.00 FT441.30 FTMSL .437.30 FTMSL

3.50 FEETBELOWTOC437.80 FTMSL

446.82 FT408.12 FT38.70 FT413.93 FT5.81 FT

72.77 MIN95.17 MIN

" ' . • ' " '- , -

SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) '(T2-T1)x60 ~HYDRAULIC CONDUCnVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.11 1.10

900.00 SEC 900.00 SEC&&S$<@ft2PfHl»O £ tc AC /H4fC|:sp<6fc?ip6;;!CM/S 6.4E-06 GM/S

,' . • • ' '

REOOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG 0/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

. 0.07 6PM6.24

7.22E-06 CM1S

Oolder Associates /I H 3 0 5 8 0 9'

r ' ?J M O

LJ: lV

00 +-

.ov3H onnvycuH NT*• .

AR3058IO

55 59 59 5

(U) QV3H

AR3058II

J 95

IO

TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELLTESTNO.


LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY ' .ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION '


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) ,HYDRAUUC HEAD AT BEGINNING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT BEGINNING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Ho3 - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINNING OF SLUG TEST; (t; T - 0)ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINNING OF RECOVERY TEST Q; T- 0)

ED275

2.55 INCH3.70 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT124.00 FTBGST 138.40141.10 FTBGST 200.00-2.50 FTBGST 121.30

7.00 FT444.30 FTMSL437.30 FTMSL

4.50 FEET BELOW TOO439.80 FTMSL -

438.93 FT411.45 FT27.53 FT417.70 FT6.25 FT

53.67 MIN78.40 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBQ3

" . . " ' - v '


(HI-H1V(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA' ' • .. 1.28 1.271138.00 SEC 1133.00m 8||CM/3 1.2E-05

SECCM/S

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dtLOQ (T/T)lHYDRAUUC CONDUCnVTTY

0.08 GPM4.62

1.57E-05 CM/3

Oolder Associates A R 3 0 5 8 I 2

CO

CM

<

I

CM

in <o N co 01 T-. T ' f f ' f. "? '

(U) OllVd OV3H OnnVHOAH NT «

AR3058I3

<NO

LJ

CMUl

CO *~^^ v ' ~a^ ' ' \AJ j.

I

to

it i

O

QI L I I I I I I I I I I

CO

f

P 1oo

CM

CM

CMO 0 3 t D - « t CM O O O ( O ^ CM O C O < D ^ f r CM O' - Q C M M C M C M CM j- T- *T "' 'T' ^. -T t •««• -t '*.. •«* •<«• t ^ •*

.OV3H onnvaaxH

AR3058U


WELL ' • • • - ' • • " • ' - ' - • ' • , - " .TESTNO.


LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY

STICK-UP -,''.TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) "GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS -Hor) ^

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST fliT • 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T « 0)

ED276 ' ' • . • - . . • , '

2.55 INCH3.70 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 "FT104.10 FTBGST 116.50 FTBGS121 .20 FT BGS T 200.00 FT BGS-2.34 FTBGST 101.40 FTBGS16.00 FT452.30 FTMSL437.30 FTMSL

"**

12.66 FEET BELOW TOC.439.64 FTMSL

441.53 FT455.68 FT14.16 FT ,449.05 FT6.63 FT

891.00 MIN921.35 MIN


(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCnvrrY '


200.00 SEC 200.00 SEC 'plEl&lCM/S 2.6E-05 CM/S -

' 'RECOVERYTEST ,RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)JHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

0.06 QPM3.66

1.37E-05

flR3058lSGolder Associates

OllVd OV3M OnnVdCUH'NI

AR3058I6

2LJ

LJ

LJ' CM

TCO

gt

LJ'XO

I I I I I I___I___I I

OV3H

00o

• o

CM

o <n" oo N (o in ^ n : CM • -•»- o.:?. ?-• I 511 ? .?• -.? 5

AR30S8I7

/

I

oC


WELLTESTNO.

DRILL ROD DIAMETER :.'•.,BOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)




INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HI)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE Oil - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (1; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T - 0)

• • -

ED277

2.55 INCH3.70 INCH

200.00 FTBGS


16.00 FT453.30 FTMSL437.30 FTMSL

V.

15.40 FEET BELOW TOC437.90 FTMSL

439.44 FT452,78 FT13.34 FT442.38 FT10.40 FT

'32.87 MIN41.00 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

'


(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2 DATA TR4 DATA2.50 2.52

419.00 SEC 419.00iStHicM/s 1.3E-04 SECCM/S

' • ' • i • 'RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA •

Golder Associates A R 3 0 5 8 I 8

«{"t

r *

V

diva OV3H onnvaouH m

AR3058I9


WELLTESTNO. .


LENGTHTESTED -DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLYDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY



INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS -Hor)

. . . - ) • . • - • . - . . • •TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST(t; T - 0)

ED278 ' . .. '• . '

2.55 INCH3.70 INCH

200.00 FTBGS


15.00 FT452.30 FTMSL437.30 FTMSL


435.71 FT451.58 FT15.86 FT445.20 FT6.37 FT

30.70 MIN59.55 MIN

.- - '

FTBGSFTBGSFT.BGS

-'. ' ' ' ~~ '. . ' •


(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60 . -HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY


1302.00 SEC 1302.00iiiiiiliCM/S 1.80E-05

SECCM/S

" ' " • ' ' • . . : - •RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T7T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCnVITY

0.06 GPM4.11

1.23E-05

Golder Associates AR305820

OV3H OnnVdOAH NT

V

AR30582I

CO t

oil

-.

AR305822


WELLTESTNO.





INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T « 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (I; T - 0)

ED27'9

2.55 INCHaTO INCH

200.00 FTBGS


' 17.00 FT454.30 FTMSL437.30 FTMSL


t

432.36 FT .451.92 FT19.56 FT438.54 FT13.38 FT

24.45 MIN37.80 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

•' '•


(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60 •HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY


408.00 SEC •408.00msmmcwS 7.8iE-os SECCM/3

- •RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.

AVERAGE FLOW RATE .d(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

0.27 GPM3.98 .

5.81E-05

Oolder Associate* «R305823

CO

m4

N

"~ ~ 2 ^ X^ < M**u rI e i

LJ <n " c«fe

o I

I I I I I I I I I Io »-/ CM ro •ir in . to N 03 01 *- T- CM« « « • « . • « . • « « | « - «• 0 0 ..0 .0 0 :T.-,0-.0 0 '7 -

(U) OI1VM OV3H OnnVdOAH NT

AR30S82t*

oLJ

LJ£LJ

CO et

o

Q

CMO

I

•t

GO•

CMCM

1;*

CM

g- 1, ;Cu) ov3H

AR305825

TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGICtEST RESULTS

WELL , .TESTNO.

DRILL ROD DIAMETER . •BOREHOLE DIAMETER


;' . • : . . . - \ •

STICK-UP ' • ' • •TOP OF CASING ELEVATION .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) ;GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HO .HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) ,MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (HOT)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T - 0)

ED2710

2.55 INCH3.70 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT45.10 FTBGST 59.50 FTBGS62.20 FTBGST 200.00 FTVBGS-0.80 FTBGST 42.40 FTBGS

16.00 FT453.30 FTMSL437.30 FTMSL

15.20 FEET BELOWTOC438.10 FTMSL

432.82 FT451.58 FT18.76 FT439.87 FT11.71 FT •

31.65 MIN38.75 MIN

• • ' ' ' • ' ' ' . - ' • ' ' ' • - ' ' . ' " '


(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY '


402.00 SEC . 402.00 SECmiiCM/S 1.35E-04 CM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG CT/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.44 QPM2.37

1.60E-04

Colder Associates A R 3 0 5 8 2 6

03 Ot T- i-

(u) OIIVM OV3H onnvaoAH NT

AR305827

CMOLJ

LJ00o

LJ

in01

h-

CO t

O

LJ ^ T H T- _J T *

•i!••:j<[«•O •*** jf <o

< M X > iLJ 1 2o * '• : - • - . • • - • X • " • • - : : • . • , - • • ; - . . - • - . - • - . . - 1 \

CM

I

CMO

o

(Oo

I

CM

o o» GO i"* <o in. • ' to CM . r-'1!?•.:. 9 9; 9 9 ; 9 9 9 9

OV3H

M30S828


WELLTESTNO.

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER x

LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY ' .DEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY -

STICK-UP ' . ' • • ' •TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOWTOP OF CASING) .GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST 0; T • 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGININQ OF RECOVERY TEST ft: T - 0)

ED2711

2.55 INCH170 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT31.10 FTBGST48.20 FTBGST-a70 FT BGS T

17.00 FT454.30 FTMSL437.30 FTMSL _

•

- • -

45.50 FTBGS200.00 FTBGS28.40 FTBGS


433.99 Ft442.91 FT0.92 FT

439.54 FT3.37 FT

23.90 MIN24.95 MIN

SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS/

(HI-Hiy(HI-H2) '(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA1.43

^ 38.00 . SEC

TR4DATANANASECN A CM/S

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS,

AVERAGE FLOW RATEoXHYDRAUUCHEAD)/dILOG(T/r)l .HYDRAUUC CONDUCnvriY

NAGPMNANA

OolderAMOotates 4R305829

(O

CM

2x • •LJ t

-j LJ ££ t

-1—H- -•oo a}''£o S

COCM

« ir- F o

oqd

in ' T- in CM in ro ind I V . I CM I nI I : I I

OLLVU OV3H onnvyoAH NT

AR305830

TABLE!SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELLTESTNO.



STICK-UP .TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - HoO

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGININQ OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T* - 0)

ED27'12 .' • ' '

2.55 INCH .3.70 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT17.10 FTBGST 31.50 FTBGS34.20 FT BGS T 200.00 FTBGS-0.40 FTBGST 14.40 FTBGS

17.00 FT454.30 FTMSL437.30 FTMSL


436.78 FT447.51 FT10.73 FT442,18 FT

5.33 FT

33.35 MIN34.65 MIN

/

SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS,

(HI-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.92 • NA72.00 SEC NASEC

m&g-mCWB , N A CM/3


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOQ(T/T)lHYDRAUUC CONDUCnvrTY

1.09 GPM1.70

5.54E-04

AR305831Oolder Associates

CM

LJ £

t•••*CO C

LJ CMH- .*0-5

ooLJ '

. I J__1 I I I I I I I I I I

LJ <•?>-. Io

CMO

O r- CM ro "*• in «O N 00 01 »- , *- CM rO tj- in• - « « . ' « * ' . • . * * • I * • « « • <O O O O O O O O , O -I. •»- T- T- T- T-i i i - i . 1 T I | i i l l i I

ow3H onnvacuw NT

CMQLJ

10

LJ ' ~ . • .'

inLJ ' —

</>oZ> PCO tLJ £> CM

LJ

O

Q

I' J. i i i § 9 5 9

d

I

K5

T

inT

V

/JJ\ /TVy LJ <^l1rtVJVJ/^ I l_l • • -"*

AR305833

u

TABLE 1 , , . - • ' ' .SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL ED28TESTNO. 1




DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) ., >GROUNDWATER ELEVATION . i

INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST ft; T.O)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T-0)

•

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT24.10 FT BGS TO 38.5041.20 FT BGS TO 200.001.00 FT BGS TO 21.40

17.00 FT "435.40 FTMSL418.40 FTMSL .


417.10 FT435 69 FT18.59 FT422.90 FT12.78 FT

5.30 MIN10.50 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

, - . - • . - . ' ; • • ' • ' • • ' • • • . , ' . . _ • . . ' • •


(H!-Hiy(Hi-H2) .(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2 DATA ' TR4 DATA1.42 ' 1.69

102.00 SEC ' 102.00ngOBHCM/S 3.03E-04

I

SECCM/S

. - " • . . , . . ; , -RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / dlLOG (I/HIHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY '

0.65 GPMNANA CM/S

flR30583«*Golder Associates

Cu> oiiva OV3H onnvyaAH NT

TABLE 1 , i 'SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL ED28TESTNO. 2





INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HO ,HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - HOS)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST ft; T.O)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T-0)


200.00 FTBGS '


17.00 FT-435.40 FTMSL418.40 FTMSL


416.45 FT435.16 FT18.70 FT424.56 FT10.60 FT

10.60 MIN35.03 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

I

•

' ' . • • • ' ' . *


(Hi-H1)/(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60 ,HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY


710.00 SEC 710.003.85E-05

SECCM/S

' • • • . • • .RECOVERY TEST.RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/d[LOG (T/T)lHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

0.12 GPM2.15

4.62E-05 CM/S

Gotder Associates 1R30S836

oi±vy ov3H onnvacukH

AR305837

00CMQLdLdS

/ opo: I - ,• • • , . i - ^_ - ^- . •Ld

t

<Ld

O

Qs

I _______I 1 ____L

^ , >\ • , • .

I

(OCM

co ; " . i . >> <o • in

QV3H onnvaoAH

AR305838

f<

TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS.

WELL ED28TESTNO. 3

DRILL ROD DIAMETER .BOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)


STICK-UP •TOP OF CASINO ELEVATION •GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)

* • " •' *

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T-0)

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS


17.00 FT435.40 FTMSL418.40 FTMSL


417.03 FT423.80 FT

6.78 FTNA FTNA FT

10.90 MINNA MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

/

: • i * t ' - • .

SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS.

(HI-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

-1 - >

TR2DATA TR4.DATA2.23 3.55

_ 30.00 SEC 30.00i|i[5Gli$SlCM/S 2.48E-03

SECCM/3


1 *AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/ dJLOG (T/HlHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA CM/3

AR305839GolderAssoclates

00oLd-JLd

(/>

Q<

7

COCD

<qd

+ ii

O ~ '•«''•-•«••'''* « «O h; <D O] »-O O O O CD O O O O •

CLd> OlLVd OV3H OnOVWOAH NT

AR3058liO

TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS.

i :

WELL ED28TESTNO. 4A

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE 6EPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)




INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HO 'HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST ft; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T-0)

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT '69.10 FT BGS TO 83.5083.20 FT BGS TO 200.001.00 FT BGS TO 68.40

17.00 FT435.40 FTMSL4ia40 FTMSL


417.18 FT434.05 FT18.87 FTNA FTNA FT

17.97 MINNA MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

' > f •

SLUGTEST . . . . - •RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY


210.00 SEC 210.00.5.15E-04

SECCM/3


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/ d[LOQ (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA CM/S

OeldwAttoetotat «R3058'll

Cu> biivy OV3H onnvwaAH NT

AR3058l*2

TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT

WELL ED28TESTNO. 5

DRILL ROD DIAMETER - •BOREHOLE DIAMETER




INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - HOf)


i

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS


17.00 FT435.40 FTMSL418.40 FTMSL


,417.34 FT431.52 FT14.18 FTNA FTNA FT

9.37 MINNA MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS.

• I

(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA3.38 - 3.39

138.00 SEC ' 138.00Ull&lPCM/S 5.19E-04

SECCM/S

' " • > . . 'RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS^

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY •

NA GPMNANA CM/3

Solder Associates « R 3 0 5 8 3

00oLd-JLd

Ld

CO

oOS

»n

CM

<O

00•0 .+

I

« **• O. • <O -K ' <D <5i ' *- *- M• , • . » . • . ' • • • | * • »

? :?• •? ? T ? ? ' T T

ouyy av3H onnvwaAH m

TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS -

WELL ED28TESTNO. 8 s .

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER ,BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)


STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION ^ .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST ft; T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T-0)

2.55 INCH3.73 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT99.00 FT BGS TO 113.401iaiO FT BGS TO 200.001.00 FT BGS TO 96.30

17.00 FT-435.40 FTMSL

. 418.40 FTMSL .

18.00 FEET BELOW TOC. 417.40 FTMSL

418.71 FT432.69 FT15.98 FTNA FTNA FT

10.13 MINNA MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

" ' • * *

SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS.

(HI-H.iy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY !

TR2DATA " TR4DATA2.20 2.30

103.00 SEC 103.004.53E-04

SECCM/3

• ' '- - f

RECOVERYTEST •" -RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOQ(T/r)lHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA CM/3

Ootder Associates

O CD CD O O CO

Cu> OLLVW OV3H onnvwaAH NT


WELL ED28TESTNO. 7





INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HO ,HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - HOT)


2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT ( . :114.00 FT BGS TO 128.40 FTBGS131.10 FT BGS TO 200.00 FTBGS1.00 FT BGS TO 111.30 FTBGS

17.00 FT435.40 FTMSL418.40 FTMSL \


418.83 FT429.10 FTV2.27 FTNA FTNA FT

9.80 MINNA MIN

. • " •

SLUGTEST -RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(HI-H1V(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA,2.32 10.46

- 83.00 SEC 88.00 SEC• 1.56E-03 CM/3

RECOVEHYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULIC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA CM/S -

Golder Associates AR305847

00CMOLd

Ld ££•*H-

CMs' '' ' ' ' ' 5f* ' ' ' '

LJ tq

Q Si i r-Ld *fc•JL* J/)

6

CM

CO

03 2Ed F=

^d

CMd

**O 0 CD O 0 0

NT

AR30S8I»8

TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS,

WELL ED28TESTNO. 8



STICK-UP "TOP OF CASING ELEVATION .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONDEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) •GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)


2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT123.00 FT BGS TO 142.40 FTBGS145.10 FT BGS TO 200.00 FTBGS

1.00 FT BGS TO 125.30 FTBGS

17.00 FT .435.40 FTMSL418.40 FTMSL

13.00 FEETBELOWTOC417140 FTMSL

417.00 FT428.59 FT11.60 FTNA FTNA FT

10.30 MINNA MIN


(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2) . - ' ' . ' . -(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

/


300.00 SEC 300.00 SECiHsUHCM/S 3.98E-04 CM/3


AVERAGE FLOW RATEOXHYDRAUUC HEAD) / dtLOQ (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA CM/3

Oolder Associates

•I 1'.!1 5

OLLVy OV3H OnnVdQAH Nl

AR3058SO

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT

WELL ED28 -TESTNO. "' 9





INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)


• ' . ' • • .

2.55 INCH3.73 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

N14.40 FT144.10 FT BGS TO 158.50181.20 FT BGS f O 200.001.00 FT BGS TO 141.40

17.00 FT435.40 FTMSL418.40 FTMSL


417.25 FT431.05 FT13.80 FTNA FTNA FT

9.70 MINNA MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS


-

(Hi-Hiy(HirH2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2 DATA TR4 DATA1.04 1.0518.00 SEC 18.00

H5HHICM/S 1.71E-04SECCM/3


AVERAGE FLOW RATEoXHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA CM/3

AR30585I

00CMOLd

-J 0Ld t^ s!-'«(/) £

•ol^ *~*Ld *•L C/)

^

ZJ

?

c

1

''

5 c

,

•

'•

5S

^

D C

X-r

S;i!

• • •

i1 1

1

^• -

3 C

'

1'

^

'.'•

*rX

Si

^

h «

-

>

» W

',

•

' -

>

/

- C

•

^ ^

M r

V7

0 '

• .

>^

i- «

-(

x/

•

n «i

/

o r

iT\

- «

r

o <

^

h <- <

COo

<0o

o

NO

O

>M3

I

o o o o o o o o i o o o o o a o o oI I I I I I I I I i I I I I i l l

CLJ) OLLvy OV3H onnvyaAH NT

AR305852

TABLETSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL ED28TESTNO. 10

DRILL ROD DIAMETER .BOREHOLE DIAMETER




INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)


i •

2.55 INCH . , ' •3.78 INCH .

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT154.00 FT BGS TO 168.40 FT BG3171.10 FT BGS TO 200.00 FTBGS

• 1.00 FTBGSTO 151.30 FTBGS

17.00 FT435.40 FTMSL418.40 FTMSL


418.67 FT '430.25 FT .1158 FTNA FTNA FT

ZOO MINNA MIN

. . ' • . • ' ' • • - . r .


- \ ' •

(HI-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60 ' .HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.13 . 1.81

540.00 SEC ' 540.00 SEC5.20E-05 CM/S

• . •• ' • . • . 'RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEOXHYDRAUUC HEAD)/ d[LOQ (T/HlHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY .

NA GPMNA

v NA CM/3

OolderAwoctatei AR305853

Cu> oiivd ov3H onhvyaAH NT

flR30585l)


WELL ED28TESTNO. 11


LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE •ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL



INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

*


'

2.55 (NCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT178.10 FT BGS TO 19Z50195.20 FT BGS TO 200.000.90 FT BGS TO 175.40

13.00 FT.431.40 FTMSL418.40 FTMSL


417.39 FT424.63 FT7.24 FTNA FTNA FT

10.47 MINNA MIN

-

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

•


(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVrrY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.85 ' 2.15

• 83.00 SEC 88.005.12E-04

SECCM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEOXHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/HlHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVnY

NA GPMNANA CM/3

Solder Auoelotes AR305855

U

Cu) OILVU OVGH onnvaa H NI

JtI *J £. +

AR305856

TABLETSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL ED29TESTNO. 1


LENGTHTESTED .DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL



INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)

, . \

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGININQ OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T -

2.55 INCH . .3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT19.10 FT BGS TO 33.50 FTBGS36.20 FT BGS TO 200.00 FTBGS0.03 FT BGS TO 16.40 FTBGS

17.00 FT .463.52 FTMSL451.52 FTMSL

17.08 FEET BELOW TOC451.44 FTMSL "

449.17 FT '464.77' FT .15.60 FT459.13 FT

5.64 FT

37.43 MIN42.00 MIN


(HI-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60 •HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY


268.00 SEC 268.00 SEC, 7.7E-05 CM/3


AVERAGE FLOW RATEOXHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

0.33 GPM8.57

3.31E-05

\J-

.(u) ouva av3H'onnvyoAH NTAR305858


WELL ED29TESTNO. 2


LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE •ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION .


INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS -Hor) '

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (1; T -

; " " •"

2,55 INCH3.73 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT35.10 FT BGS TO 49.5052.20 FT BGS TO 200.00-0.50 FT BGS TO 32.40

6.00 FT457.52 FTMSL451.52 FTMSL

5.50 FEETBELOWTOC• 452.02 FTMSL

452.99 FT436.93 FT16.08 FT44194 FT12.01 FT

31.77 MINNA MIN

.\-

FTBG3FTBGSFTBG3

S

SLUQTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(HI-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR20ATA TR4DATA1.42 4.2560.00 SEC 60.00

llHliiCM/3 1.4E-03

I

SECCM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/ dlLOG (T/T)JHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA

AR305859Ootder Associates .

oiivu OV3H onnvaoAH

AR305860

TABLE 1 'SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT?

WELLTESTNO.

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE'DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)LENGTHTESTED 'DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL



INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T -

ED293A

2.55 INCH3.73 INCH

200.00 FTBGS( -

14.40 FT50.10 FTBGST 64.5067.20 FTBGST 200.000.03 FTBGST 47.40

6.00 FT457.52 FTMSL451.52 FTMSL

6.08 FEET BELOW TOO451.44 FTMSL

45Z10 FT433.63 FT

18.47 FT451.81 FTiaid FT5.83 MIN8.00 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS


(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2) '(T2-T1)X60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY


130.00 SEC 130.002.8E-04 CM/3 .2.6E-04

SECCM/3


X ' .

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

f - .

2.23 GPM11.89

1.62E-04 CM/S

AR30586I

u

I I I I I

f :<

I(9

o ••*-y <f 7 <f <? ?

CU> OLLVW OV3H OnnVWQAH NT

AR305862

TABLE 1 -SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL . ED29TESTNa 4





INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HI)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft: T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T -

• ' ' . - - . ' ' '

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS


6.00 FT457.52 FTMSL451.52 FTMSL


452.15 FT432.98 FT19.17 FTNA FTNA FT

10.07 MIN2.63 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

•

.


(HI-Hiy(HI-H2) •(T2-T1)x60 .HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY


158.00 SEC ' 158.00mmmcMjB 3.4E-M SECCM/3

.RECOVEHYTEST *RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)lHYDRAUUC CONDUCnVTTY '

NA GPMNANA CM/3

-

OelderAswelates A R 30 5 86 3

I ~

I 3J 3" }\ \

CLJ> OILVW ov3H annvyaAH NT

AR30586I*

TABLE 1 , . • .SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT?

WELL ED29TESTNO. 5





INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI -Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - HOT)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T -

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT80.10 FT BGS TO 94.5097.20 FT BGS TO 200.000.08 FTBGS TO 77.40

8.00 FT '457.52 FTMSL451.52 FTMSL


452.46 FT431.90 FT20.57 FTNA FTNA FT

25.00 MIN28.50 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS


(Hl-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY


208.00 SEC ,-. 208.00mmmCMI* Z70E-04

SECCM/3


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOQ(T/r)l .HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA CM/3

OolderAssociates A R 30 58 65

.•* * * • * • • . • I ' ' • • * * •ooo o o o o o I

• I tI ><I

Cu> onvy ov3H onnvwaAH NI

V " • • • ' ' , ' ' ' ' ; - . : ' •AR305866


WELL ED29TESTNO. 6

I . - -



STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION 'GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION '

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HO .HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hoc)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME Td BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T •

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT103.10 FT BGS TO 117.50 FTBGS120.20 FT BGS TO 200.00 FTBGS0.04 FT BGS TO 100.40 FTBGS

3.00 FT435.00 FTMSL432.00 FTMSL


454.24 FT437.21 'FT17.03 FTNA FTNA FT

22.07 MIN27.20 MIN


, *

(Hr-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.62 1.6178.00 SEC 7100 SEC

miHCM/3 3.56E-04 CM/3


AVERAGE FLOW RATEOXHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

NA GPMNANA CM/3

Colder Associates AR305867

co ci «- »- CM to.

O O 00 CD O 00 CD

< •J 9

ClJ> OliVW OV3H OnnVWQAH NT

ftR3Q5868


WELL ED29TESTNO. 7



STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION . ' 'GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) ,GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - HOS)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T - 0

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH '

200.00 FTBGS

, 14.40 FT118.10 FT BGS TO 132.50 FTBGS135.20 FT BGS TO 200.00 FTBGS0.06 FT BGS TO 115.40 FTBGS

8.00 FT .457.52 FTMSL451.52 FTMSL ;

6.08 FEETBELOWTOC451.46 FTMSL ,

453.83 FT430.19 'i FT23.63 FT441.78 FT11.59 FT

21.03 MIN22.77 MIN

SLUQTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(Hi-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.95 2.1794.00 SEC 94.00 SEC

IIIiiPCM/S 4.83E-04. CM/S ..

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNEH ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEOXHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)lHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

1.77 GPMNANA CM/3

Oolder Associates AR305869

I JI

ouvw ovsH onnvaaAH NT

AR305S70

TABLE 1 * . - • • •SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS,

WELL ED29TESTNO. 8

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE QIAMETER :BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OFTESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION .

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) .GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HOHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI -Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T • 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T -

2.55 INCH3.79 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT-133.10 FT BGS TO 147.50 FT BGS150.20 FT BGS TO 200.00 FTBGS0.04 FT BGS TO 130.40 FTBGS

6.00 FT457.52 FTMSL451.52 FTMSL


45130 Ft427.77 FT25.53 FT439.88 FT12.11 FT

2167 MIN .35.63 MIN

» - • . .

SLUQTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS.

(HI-Hiy(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY 1

TR2DATA . TR4DATA2.0T 2.13

698.00 SEC 698.00 SEC6.36E-05 CM/3

- • ' • • . " ' . " • •RECOVEHYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/ dlLOG (T/T)1HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

0.27 GPMNANA CM/3

Oolder Associates48.305871'

1 i' a

I

CU> OUYW OV3H OnnVUCJAH NT


WELL ED29TESTNO. 9



STICK-UP "•TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HQHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (HOS)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (H03- Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T - 0

i

2.55 INCH178 INCH

200.00 FTBGS


6.00 FT457.52. FTMSL451.52 FTMSL


45138 FT .434.36 FT19.00 FT447.97 FT1161 FT\

23.73 MIN25.33 MIN

/

FTBG3FTBGSFTBGS

' - ' . ' • ' ' ' - ' • '

SLUGTEST .RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2) ' ' , ,(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY ' :

TR2DATA TR4DATA2.14 ; 2.5264.00 SEC 64.00

HHfGllCM/3 8.46E-04SECCM/3

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSES.

AVERAGE FLOW RATE .<J(HYDRAUUC HEAD) /d[LOQ OmjHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

2.26 GPM143

S.69E-04 CM/3

AR305873Golder Associates

'II

CLJ) oiivw ovaH onnvaaAH

AR3Q587I*

OY

QLJ

LJPo: to «?

o

oI

KJdI

I

I

ID t</V~ / 2 +LJ c,'^ ^ O

Q &>^ ^u

LJ

i l l i i i t i t i i i i t i i i

Cu) av3H onnvyoAH

cpri<£'!2±2£i!s9S!2S-Di2iSS3p.44-.5 J 54 i 5 5.9 5353

AR305875


WELL « ED29TESTNO. 10

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER 'BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)




INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (H!)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Kos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TQ BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T « 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T « 0

• - ( •' ' /


200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT16110 FTBGSTO 177.50 FTBGS160.20 FTBGSTO 200.00 FTBGS0.06 FTBGSTO 160.40 FTBGS

6.00 FT-457.52 FTMSL451.52 FTMSL.

6,06 FEETBELOWTOC451.46 FTMSL

453.24 FT426.89 FT '26.35 Ft427.27 FT0.37 FT

55.73 MIN76.63 MIN


(H!-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60 . . . . . - ' •HYDRAUUC CONDUCnVITY


1208.00 SEC 120aOO SEC5.75E-06 CM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOGCI/T)JHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.00 GPM3.63

1.13E-06 CM/S

ftR305876Oolder Associates

00

GO

Ld

Ot JO ^ tfl .'to N 03 <7l . i--d d d d d d d d II I I I I I I I

• . . . . . . . ,(JJ) OLLVH OV3H OROVaOAH NT

4R305877

CMQLJLJ

h-

LJ

O S

LJ -o> 2*9 fc< pLJ

O

Q

QV3H onnvaoAH

I

cqdI

« o

COwI

AR305878

TABLE 1 . .SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL ED29TESTNO. «

DRILL ROD DIAMETER .BOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTHTESTED .DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL



INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft: T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft: T «

2.55 INCH178 INCH .

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT173.10 FTBGSTO 192.50195.20 FTBGSTO 200.00

0.00 FTBGSTO 175.40

100 FT454.52 FTMSL451.52 FTMSL

100 FEET BELOW TOO451.52 FTMSL

452.21 FT429.83 FT22.38 FT*452.00 FT22.17 FT

8.90. MIN19.17 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

- - '• • " ' ' - ' 'SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(HI-H1)/(HI-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY 1


534.00 SEC 534.001.00E-04

SECCM/3

. . . • . . • • • ,RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS.

AVERAGE FLOW RATEOXHYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)]HYDRAUUC coNDUcnvmr

, 0.57 GPM4.11

1.20E-04 CM/3

AR305879

OV

aeLJ o <o

. ' . . • ' <fjV • •o

LJ £toed

Lil C

O

O »•;

' ' -' I

'. • \.

CO

I 5- i 3;}II

Cu> ouva ov3H onnvwaAH NT

flR305880

L

TABLE 1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULT

WELL ED29TESTNO. . 12


LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER-LEVEL



INITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGININQ OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HOS - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft; T -

': ' v ; '

2.55 INCH178 INCH

200.00 FTBGS

14.40 FT88.10 FTBGSTO 102.50 FTBGS105.20 FTBGSTO 200.00 FTBGS

0.00 FTBGSTO 85.40 FTBGS

100 FT454.50 FTMSL451.50 FTMSL

100 FEETBELOWTOC451.50 FTMSL

451.72 FT444.74 FT

8.98 FT aOONA FTNA FT

12.57 MIN16.00 MIN

' . ' • ' ' • •SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(HI-H1XHJ-H2) . • ' ' •(T2-T1)x60HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA2.19 3.0446.00 SEC 20.00 SEC

9.98E-Q4 CM/3 • iHUfgiCM/S

RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)}HYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY ,

NA GPMNANA CM/3

_. A u, AR30588IOolder Associates .

j 9" 5

i

(id) oiiva.ov3H onnvaaAH NT

AR305882

• 'r

. - APPENDIX J' . ' :- ' '

SLUG TEST DATA AND ANALYSIS

AR305883

- .TABLE r .- ..'.••;,•• . ; ' • . -.-•• . -' . • . , •i jSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL EP-1

CASING DIAMETER 2.00 INCHBOREHOLE DIAMETER 6.00 INCH

LENGTHTESTED 19.60 FT

STICK-UP 3.50 FT .TOP OF CASING ELEVATION 648.50 FTMSLGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION 645.00 FTMSL

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) 62.60 FEET BELOW TOCGROUNDWATER ELEVATION 485.90 FTMSL

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) 485.90 FT-.HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 500.74 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-Hos) 14.64 FT

• ' . • ' •" • ' f

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGlNING OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0) 1.00 MIN


TR1 DATA(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2) 1.26(T2-Tl)x60 122.00 SECHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

Colder Associates AR 30588*4

IQ_Ld

UJ

COLJ

OZ>CO

o d d d d o o o o' • II I I I I

(u) ouva av3H onnvaaAH N~I

AR305885

.'•-.- - • . - • • -^ - ... ' • ' '. ?- ' ' • . • 923-6053


WELL EP-2



STICK-UP 3.50 FTTOP OF CASING ELEVATION • 648.50 FTMSL 'GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION 545.00 FTMSL

\ ' ' , • " " - ' ' .1 ' ' • ' • ' • • •

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) 62.60 FEET BELOW TOCGROUNDWATER ELEVATION • 485.90 FTMSL

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) 485.72 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 489.56 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-Hos) 3.84 FT

JEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST(t;T*0) 4.20 MIN


, TR4DATA(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) ,. 33.25(T2TTl)x60 18.00 SECHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY ' ' - ' '

ColderAssociates AR30S886

CMIQ.LJ

COLJ

.o-JCO

^(id) ouva av3H onnvaQAH NT

AR305887

~/ \u. TABLE! • 923-6053SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

. .WELL ' . * ' • . • - ' . . ,: -: . •• . . . ' '-. ' EP-3 ' . .

CASING DIAMETER . 2.00 INCHBOREHOLE DIAMETER 6.00 INCH

LENGTHTESTED 17.00 FTI . • . . • " ' • '

STICK-UP 3.50 FTTOP OF CASING ELEVATION 545.50 FTMSLGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION 542.00 FTMSL

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) 62.13 FEETBELOWTOCGROUNDWATER ELEVATION 483.37 FTMSL

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) 477.86 FTHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 495.63 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-HOS) 17.77 FT

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0) 5.63 MIN


TR1DATA(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) 1.28(T2-T1)x60 30.00 SECHYDRAOUCCONDUCnvrrY 2.71E-04 CM/S

Colder Associate /JR305888

K).ICLLJ

LJ

I/)LJ

o-JC/)

(id), ouva av3H onnvaaAH NT

AR305889

923-6053

TABLE 1 , .SUMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS '

WELL EU15AD



STICK-UP : 3.60 FTTOP OF CASING ELEVATION x 548.50 FTMSLGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION . ' 545.00 FTMSL

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) 66.20 FEET BELOW TOGGROUNDWATER ELEVATION 482.30 FTMSL

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HO 482.25 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 600.73 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -Hos) 18.48 FT

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T-0) 2.53 MIN' ' '

SLUG TEST .RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

TR1DATA(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) 2.26(T2-T1)x60 60.00 SECHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY ' . . :

Colder Associates

AR305890

Ld

COLJ

O~)_JCO

/

,0

CM ^. UJ.2 D

• • • • • • • • • • - • • • • ^ » •O O O O O O O O O I »- T- «- ' « - * - * - . « -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

(id) oiivy av3H onnvaoAHAR30589I

«

' CiIII

923-6053

U - ' ' : " " • . • . . - < ' ' ' . '..-. • • • - '...- TABLEV . ' •'-•• "; '• '•"•'• ' . "' '• •> • ' ' ' '

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL EU15AS •




DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) 62.60 FEET BELOW TOCGROUNDWATER ELEVATION 486.00. FTMSL

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) 485.98 FT. HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 504.03 FT

MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-Hos) 18.05 FT

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0) 1.50 MIN

SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS .

TR1DATA(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) 1.36(T2-T1)x60 240.00 SECHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ' ; ' ' : -

GolderAssoclates AR305892

I/OLO

Z)LJ

LJ

OZ)

.w00

CM

00 i-s

CM6

in «- in CM • .in * 10 in •* in inq d r 6 , • « d . n d ^ d01 o i o i o i o I

. .(id) ouva av3H onnvaQAH NT . :

AR305893

TABLE 1 . • • - .. •'.' .-", '.'... - - ' ' ' r' . , ' •- - . .SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL ED16 . . " - . ' •

. CASING DIAMETER 2.00 INCHBOREHOLE DIAMETER 6.00 INCH

LENGTHTESTED 12.00 FTi ' ' , ' - • - '


DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) 41.30 FEET BELOW TOOGROUNDWATER ELEVATION 485.20 FT MSL

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HO 485.19 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 495.23 FT ~MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-Hos) 10.04 FT

' . ' • . . * • • . -

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0) 0.77 MIN

LUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

TR4DATA(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2) ; 2.28(T2-T1)x60 12.00 SECHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY 11I1P11CM/S

uColder Associates AR30589t*

>

*

(D

QLJ

LJ

r-COLJr-OZ> ..JCO

c

<r

3 "r

*"

- ci r

--

M H•» r

•-

*

r>'.

•) T•» c

•-

x* '

r u•> c

x<

,

•) ci c

x*

-

a r3 C

-- '

X**

* 03 C

•

S

Q C3 C

r

.

x

n .»3

.X*

- . *»

.

^

- C- »

V,

x

*J f— T

^

T •<

i

•-

*i

t u» T

"'••

r-*

T U- »

-

x*1"

D r— *•

• ; -

x

*

^ 0

r"

0 C— T

. «

n c *c

oo*~ -

CO

."

CM*" .

•

00 x ~0 LJ

1 <•t- •

10O

•••*'•o

CM

°

o

M

w

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I-''• • "• ' • : '• .. • .-. •

: , - ; . " • • " ' , ; • ; ' . - " • •(id) ouva QV3H onnvaaAH NT

AR305895

, 923-6053

U - • • • ' • - " - . • • - • • : . : • ' . - ' • : / . . • • : - • ' • :• '"•' TABLE 1 ', • .. ' ' .: ,' . ' .'•':. - '• ' • . ' • • > '

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS ,

WELL ED18


LENGTHTESTED , 13.00 FT

STICK-UP 3,60 FTTOP OF CASING ELEVATION 601.50 FTMSLGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION 498.00 FTMSL


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HQ 461.50 FTHYDRAUUC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 476.44 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAUUC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-Hos) 14.94 FT

ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0) 1.73 MIN


TR4DATA(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) 2.02(T2-Tl)x60 124.00 SECHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY • ;

ColderAssodates

00

5bJ. 3

LJ

. COLJ

OZ)CO

(id) ouva QV3H onnvaaAH NT

SEPTEMBER 1992 • 923-605:3.

RISING HEAD TEST

WELL NO. ED-20

DATEINITIAL PRESSURECASING DIAMETERSAND DIAMETEREQUIVALENT DIAMETEROPEN INTERVALK

10\1\9228.30 PS!2.00 INCHES6.00 INCHES3.69 INCHES15.00 FEET

1.67E-02 CM/SEC

****"?** flR305898

r-

LJh-

Q< .8LJ ,Jl Q

LJ

O

(7),o:

t

ccc

'

——— a-

3 ——————

- •

•

———— B-

a ———

-•

•

\a ——— r

'

:-

. •

*

B — • ———

.

o0

o0CM

OO0

0Ooo

oo

oo

o0CM

0OO

3 O O O O O O O3 «- CM ro ^ in 10 . . •• t>.3 d d d d d d d

oLU

LU

OllVd OV3H OO1

flR305899

SEPTEMBER 1992 ' . ' • 923-6053

FALLING HEAD TEST

WELL NO. ED-21


11.42 PSI2.00 INCHES6.00 INCHES3.69 INCHES15.00 FEET

1.65E-03 CM/SEC

Colder Associat1TR305900

00LJ

Q<C -,- _~D . . - O

LUCO

(_J CM CL,- LU

LUtJ U——J———(_——|———|———[•••• M———t——1———I———I———I———I qO

OllVd QV3H OOT

HR3Q590I

SEPTEMBER 1992 ' ' - -, 923-6053

RISING HEAD TEST

WELL NO. ED-22

DATE« SEPT 22,1992DEPTH TO WATER* -6.00 FEETCASING DIAMETE 2.00 INCHESSAND DIAMETE 6.00 INCHES

EQUIVALENT DIAMETE 3.69 INCHESOPEN INTERVAL ,20.00 FEET

K« 1.46E-04 CM/SEC


•

-

00LJh-Q<W

C*4

i '• — oLU

0zCOa:

_

t• * •

•

• -

' D

3 —————

D

n

Dn

"V

•

.D

- '.-

Dn

*

,

Da

DT

.

t

•

' '-

-

D

—— a—D

-a ——

,

t

a

'

0od0

; .. .o0d00

oo0(D

uLJ(/

O iii0 2O H-•*

. > .

OooCM

OOO

o *- CM K) t m 10 r ooo o q q q q q q qd d d d d d d d . d

'J

o

QV3H OOT

AR305903

923-6053

• TABLE1SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL , ED23

. CASING DIAMETER 2.00 INCHBOREHOLE DIAMETER 6.00 INCH

LENGTHTESTED 16.00 FT'. I ' '

STICK-UP 3.00 FTTOP OF CASING ELEVATION . 418.00 FTMSLGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION 415.00 FTMSL


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI) 401.00 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 377.60 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-Hos) 23.40 FT

I EST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0) 2.50 MIN .

SLUG TEST .RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

TR1DATA(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) ' 2.25(T2-T1)x60 12.00 SECHYDRAUUC CONDUCTIVITY

Colder Associates

ro-(NQLJ.JLJ

1—00LJ1—OZ)_JCO

c

f3 »

f

/

Ci <•

^

M r*a c

•

'

/

1 -s3 C

^

I- U3 C

-

/f

t U3 C

/

3 r3 C

x

•» 03 C

'

0 C3 C

!

.-

x

• "

n . - ' • » •3

x

— V1 V

/

c- »i

y

••

'

^ ^™ • »

/

1 ""— V

t u— »

o

K)O

^ d 2i'p.LU2 +»- - '

o

0

n. ' •mm •

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' . ' . - . • _ 1

• _ '.

" • -' . ' • • ' I '

(u) ouva av3H onnvacuH ur\

M305905

SEPTEMBER 1992 823-6053• • ' • . . • ' f . - ' ' • '

REVISED APRIL 1894

FALLING HEAD TEST

WELL NO. * EU-25

DATEINmAL PRESSURECASING DIAMETERSAND DIAMETEREQUIVALENT DIAMETEROPEN INTERVALK

Sopt. 28.19926.70 PSI2.00 INCHES6.00 INCHES

. 8.69 INCHES15.00 FEET

7.04E-04 CM/SEC

6oWerAssoe""s 4*305906

•

1

OllVJd QV3H OOT

SEPTEMBER 1992 • 823-60S3

REVISED APRIL 1894

FALLING HEAD TEST•

WELL NO. EU-26

DATEINfTIAL PRESSURECASING DIAMETERSANDDiAMETEREQUIVALENT DIAMETEROPEN INTERVALK

Sept. 28,199214.20 PSI2.00 INCHES6.00 INCHES8.69 INCHES20.00 FEET

5.S2E-03 CM/SEC

Colder Associates

/5R305908

COLJ

Lj-ax iLU

O

0»Ci

3£2

oJ—

.>

ID

-S-1

-

O3

Da

cs—

i

cD

— ED

an

— ED3

COD

'• \

D-e-3 '

i-B-a33

tID

— €a33

-Sa0aD3 —3 oQO

oqd10

q o"^^. ' 1oLU(A

8dCM

oq.o

o o o o oo o o o o o oo o o o oo - - C M to ** vn to r*. a o w o * - CM i o ^ « n to^ ^ m % ; * ' « - - • • • • • • • _ • * « • »

0 ,° ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? T T T 7 7 T T

OllVd QV3H DOT .

AR305909

SEPTEMBER 1992 923-6053

RISING HEAD TEST

WELLNO. ED-27


9/29/9236.21 PSI2.00 INCHES6.00 INCHES3.69 INCHES28.00 FEET

8.S2E-04 CM/SEC

Colder Associates AR3059IO

h-coLJQ<LJ

O

COo:

u . •?[LU ct/) «

OllVd QV3H OOT

•W3059./I.

SEPTEMBER 1992 923-6053

RISING HEAD TEST

WELL NO. ED-28

DATEINITIAL PRESSURECASING DIAMETERSAND DIAMETEREQUIVALENT DIAMETEROPEN INTERVALK ... .•...'

SEPT. 30,199249.82 PSI2.00 INCHES6.00 INCHES3.69 INCHES

19.00 FEET6.1 IE-04 CM/SEC

Colder Associates

2 I10LU2

OllVd QV3H OO1

AR3059I3

SEPTEMBER 1992 . 923-6053

RISING HEAD TEST

WELL NO. ED-29


10\2\9231.13 PSI2.00 INCHES6.00 INCHES3.69 INCHES22.70 FEET

1.26E-03 CM/SEC

Colder Associates

AR3059IL

OllViJ QV3H OCTIi.

AR3059I5

V"

'-. " ' '• • ' ' ' ••" . V • - , - • " Ji. - •

: O ' •: •:"'.- ., • : ':"/

APPEND1XK

VALERIE ROAD AREA BACKGROUNDWATER LEVEL FLUCTUATIONS

A-R3 05916.

LJ

CM O CM "fr U J O O O CM ^ l O O O O CM <* tO OOO CMi i I I r - ^ . ^ - ^ - ^ C M C M . C M C M C M t O t O' . ' I I I I I . I I I I I I I

(U) NMOQAAVdO

AR3059I7

8

QLU

o.00 -

<A 1>- i.i - *

LU <

CM

LUQLLU

«.' t01

LJ

CM O CM < tO 00 O CM <tf U> 00 O CM ^ ID 00 O CMI I I i :*-••*- ;»^ .*-'»- C M C M CM CM CM rO rO

I I I I I k I I I I I I

(U) NMOQMVaQ

. AR3059I8

&

LJ

CO

CO -g.QX <LJ 9

crQ

CM

O < ""'"* "•- •' •' ' ' ' ' " ' ' •' ' ' • ' 'Q Sflh I8TT ' CM

o

tQ

.*°Ow- urio

rO Vf

S ffi^m_>

CM ^ ' a

CMLUa:LU

CM OlCM *"

CM

CM O CM •* • tO. 00 O CM TJ- to CO O CM. «t tO OOO CMI |l I ±- ^ t- i- i- CM CM CM CM CM r O t O

I I I I I I I . I . I I I I

(id)

AR3059I9

to

CM O CM •* tO 00 O 'CM •* tO CO O CM •<*• tO 00 O CMi I I I *- *- .: •— «- i- CM CM CM CM CM K) rO

I I I I I I I I I I I I

QLU

toQ

o pr

LUorLU

^

NAAOQAAVaO RR305920

00

00

to

UJ- _ _: __JSC^L._____!_ '.-• ___ ' . ' •*

*! ¥ ." S- . rx!to

o o I 1 4 * I I L-UI'Tsq I I I I I I I l.rr P '^ < • sat s_ '• • •• o(/).JS —Sir*— — — •«- — — — — ——— — — ——— — 3QX <or Jffl Et Wi

tv

Q

<E£.Q

> a i isai^H—^—i—a-J—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i a .KLJ QO: j nani *• i i i i ^-. ^-1<aa * ^a. ^

£ I i fe . " ^^ ^ • » i • . .i s1o >

CMtO

tO

C M O C M < * t O C Q O C M 1 < t t O O O O C M < < t t O C O O C Mi I I I « - • « - • « - • • < • - » - . - C M C M ' C M C M . C M - ' i O r O

I I \ II I I I I I I I

(u)AR305921!

CM O CM ^ tO CO O CM t ID 00 O CM ^ tO 00 O CM|| I I T- » - • » - . < - » - 'CM.'CM CM CM CM lO'lO

I I I I I I I I I I I I

f

NMOQMVda

AR305922

g<*

<J v

CM • O • CM •* tO 00 OCM •* t O C O OCM •<* tO CO O CMi l l I • • - ' • - • < • - « - * - C M • C M C M C M C M t O r O

I I I I I I I I \ I I I

(id)

AR305923

oy

i - M T i i i m s a E M i l l ° ~

Ps

to.• M

QLU

ox—x(/)

S,y <—orLU yi §h-.CM

yor. LJ

cn

(ij)AR30592ti

LJ

(U) NMOQAAVaa

AR305925

01

»- O •*- CM tOI I I

(U) NAAOQMVaa

AR305926

OMy0.

X

10OLU

~ ° '.*'f 1Q LU ^

«§ II $ iCM

or

01

to

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

yax

tooLU

yQL

CJl

(u)AR305927

S- • •'a y.

CM

oM

OLU

'LUorLUIrCM

yor

en

(id) NMOOMVaO

AR305928

en

(id)AR305929

LJ

h-t/oooLJ 3oor

yor

O >Q

Q

tocM «- o*- CM to tn tor^ oocn oI I I I I I I I I • -oo> oo

(id) NMOQAAVda

AR305930

LJ

CO

00

LJ oor

O >Q

Q

ocn oo t^'to i n ^ t o CM »-; o •«- CM to •* 'm to r>oo en o- I I I I I I I I I -

(id)AR305931

u

o en GO 't - to in *tto CM •«- o •-'. CM ro •* in t o i ^ o o c n oI I I I . I I I I I < -

(id) NMOQMVaa

AR305932

o en oo h* to m *t to CM «- o «- CM to •<* m tor*- o o c n oI I I I I I

en

(id) NMOQMVaa

AR305933

I I I I I I I I I «-

(id) NMOQAAVaO ,

AR30593li

I I I I I I I I I * •

(id) NMOQMVaa

AR305935

1

i1'

APPENDIX L! - ' - •

ANISOTROPIC FLOW SYSTEM CALCULATIONS

"K305936

May 1993 L-l 923-6053

INTRODUCTION! . • • . . ' ; . _ ' ; . , ' ' ; • ' - ' . • ' - • ' . • : ' / . . . . - •

This appendix presents a detailed discussion of the calculations of groundwaterflow velocities using Monte Carlo simulations and calculations of equivalent

' . ' V ' • . ' . ' ,hydraulic conductivities in the anisotropic bedrock aquifer at the Site.

* ' • • ' . • , . . • .

Groundwater Flow Direction . ,The interbedded sequence of sandstone and siltstone strata influences the localdirection of the groundwater flow at the Site. When groundwater crosses aboundary between these two lithological types, the flow lines tend to changedirection depending on the ratio of hydraulic conductivities as follows (Freeze andCherry, pp. 172, 1979): ,

"'- tan(ai) -

where:

= sandstone hydraulic conductivity;= siltstone hydraulic conductivity;

a, = angle of the groundwater flow in the sandstone relative to the. perpendicular direction to the geologjc contact

a2 - an e of the groundwater flow in the siltstone relative to theperpendicular direction to the geologic contact

Figure L-l presents the relationship between angles at and a2 considering adifference of 15 to 2 orders of magnitude between the sandstone and siltstone

/ •• . - . ' -hydraulic conductivities. Individual layers at the Site are considered to behomogeneous and isotropic in this evaluation. At the scale of the entire Site, theinterbedded sandstone and siltstone strata (layered heterogeneity) would tend toact as a single anisotropic system (Freeze and Cherry, pp. 32, 1979). Theequipotential lines and flow lines interpreted on cross section and plan projections

May 23,1993 Goldor AssociatesAR305937

F — -

May 1993 . L-2 923-6053

on text Figures 3-13, 3-14, and 3-15 represent the average anisotropic aquiferbehavior, rather than localized heterogeneities. The direction of groundwater flowin an anisotropic aquifer has been estimated using the graphical method shownin Freeze and Cherry (pp. 178, 1989). Also, the equivalent hydraulic conductivityof an anisotropic aquifer system has been estimated using the formulae indicatedby Freese and Cherry (pp. 34, 1989).

: - ' __ _ . . ' ? • ; _ '._''' '

Groundwater Flow Velocity CalculationsIn general/ groundwater flow velocities can be calculated using the Darcy flowequation: / . v

•'- . '.- . KI - • -: '•..'"'" - • • . • : - 'V_ _ _ i • . •'•••• • . . ' •~ • / : ' ! . ' '

' ' n ' ' ' • . ' . . - ' . ; ' •

where:K «'"" hydraulic conductivity;I = hydraulic gradient;n = effective porosity; and „V = groundwater flow velocity.

Based on information developed by the various hydrogeologic investigations at theSite, the bedrock aquifer acts as an anisotropic aquifer at the scale of the Site and

' * . . ' • • • - * • . ' ' , . ' 'the groundwater flow velocity vector is calculated using three-dimensional flowequations (Freeze and Cherry, p.34, 1979): ,

•v.n

n

Vz = — ~n

May 23,1993 Golder Associates

V AR305938

.May 1993. L-3 923-6053

where: '"- • : .v.. - ' • • - . - . - . • • • . ' . : - - • : • •

Vx'-Vy Vz = Projection of the velocity vector V on the coordinatesystem.

= Hydraulic conductivity values in the direction of thecoordinate system.

= Hydraulic gradient values in the direction of thecoordinate system. '

xyz = Coordinate system axis which are oriented horizontaland parallel to the strike (x and b), horizontal andperpendicular to the. strike (y axis) and vertical (z axis).

. •' . - ' • , • ' . i '

In general, the groundwater flow at the Site can be separated into the followingflow sections (see text Figure 3-24): ' . * " ' .

• Groundwater flow in the recharge zone,' with flow mainly to thenorthwest; down dip of the geologic, strata (flow section 1);

• ' ' . , • t ' * * . - ' ' . i ' '

. • Groundwater flow in the mid section between the recharge zone and fConoy Creek (flow section 2); and V

• Groundwater flow in the discharge zone, with the main <groundwater flow direction is to tiie southwest along Conoy Creek(flow section 3).

' f ' •

Since parameters needed for these calculations vary within certain ranges, aprobabilistic approach using Monte Carlo simulations has been used to estimate . •the groundwater flow velocities for the cases outlined above. Monte Carlo analysisuses known or likely parameter values and the probability distribution of thosevalues and randomly combines those parameters to calculate answers andcalculate the probability of those answers being correct Available Site dataregarding the known ranges of hydraulic conductivity and hydraulic gradients,and effective porosity values estimated from literature, were input into the @RISKcomputer program. This program allows for Monte Carlo simulations to be

May 23,1993 Goldftf Associates

AR305939

May 1993 L-4 923-6053

completed with the equations governing the relationship of the parameters (i.e.,V = KJVn). The input parameter values are shown in Table 3-5 (also reproducedin this Appendix). A triangular probability distribution was used to describe eachparameter by specifying the minimum, most probable and maximum values (Table3-5) obtained from inspection of the core samples.

The following is a description of the input parameter selection. The inputparameters for the calculation of the groundwater flow velocity components wereseparated in four categories (Table 3-5):

• Geologic parameters:. * Percent sandstone and fractured rock (more permeable

materials)• Effective porosity;• Average dip angle of the geologic strata;

• Hydrogeologjc parameters:• Hydraulic conductivity of individual hydrogeologic units;

I / • Equivalent hydraulic conductivity of an anisotropic aquifer;—' , « Projected hydraulic conductivity on the coordinate system;

• Hydraulic parameters: i• Hydraulic gradients along the coordinate system;

' . ; ' • ' Advective solute transport parameters:. • • Retardation factor (Since the same rationale will be followed

'to estimate the VCC velocity, the transport parameters areincluded in these calculations - See p. L-7 for details).

Percent sandstone and fractured rock (d/d) relative to the entire stratigraphicthickness of geologic formation at the Site is a parameter that is used to calculatethe equivalent hydraulic conductivities (K and Kye) of an equivalent anisotropicaquifer. The total stratigraphic thickness of sandstones is almost equal to the totalstratigraphic thickness of silstones at the Site. Allowing for fractured rock, therange for parameter dj/d is 50 percent to 70 percent with the most probable value

' • • • • •

May 23, 1993 ,, Colder Associates

May 1993 L-5 923-6053

of 60 percent Consequently, the percent of low hydraulic conductivity strata(sUtstones) te calculated as d d = 1-dj/d.

V " • ' ' " . ' _ *

Effective porosity (n) has been estimated to range from 5 percent to 15 percent-' • i

with the most probable value of 10 percent (see Freeze and Cherry, pp 153, 1979).The groundwater flows through the pores of the rock mass, which forms theprimary porosity system, and through the systems of joints and fracture planeswhich form the secondary porosity system. Inspection of the core and the in situtest results suggest that the secondary porosity of the shales and siltstone woulddominate over the primary in determining rock mass flow characteristics, but thisdominance would be less pronounced in the sandstone, conglomerate and diabase.

Average dip of the geologic strata («) was taken as 25 degrees, as indicated by thestructural measurements performed at the Site.

Hydraulic conductivity of the individual hydrostratigraphic units (K, and Kj) wasselected based on the statistical distribution of the hydraulic conductivity data (seeSection 35.2.4 and text Figure 3-22). The lower and upper limits of theseparameters were selected as the 99 percent confidence interval, and the mostprobable values as the mean of the two data sets (see Section 352.4).

Equivalent hydraulic conductivities of an anisotropic aquifer (K and K , withKg, along the strike of the geologic strata and K along the dip of the strata) werecalculated in accordance to the formulae presented below (see Freeze and Cherry,pp. 34,1989). ,

d/ds —

May 23,1993 , Colder Associates

AR30591*!

May 1993 L-6 923-6053

K^ = S d/dKi• • , ' • ' * * ' ' - • ,

where:

= Equivalent hydraulic conductivity perpendicular to beddingplanes

= Equivalent hydraulic conductivity parallel to the strike= Hydraulic conductivity of individual layers

. . .the percent of more permeable versus less permeable strata.

The results are presented in Table 3-5 and Figures L-2 and L-3.' '

Projected hydraulic conductivity on the coordinate systems (K Ky and KJ werecalculated in accordance with the equation of a hydraulic conductivity ellipse(Freeze and Cherry, pp 36, 1979): \-

where, K, is -the resultant hydraulic conductivity in any direction. When p = *•(the dip of the geologic strata) K, «= Ky (hydraulic conductivity along the y axis),when p = «+90, K, ="I (hydraulic conductivity along z axis). The hydraulicconductivity along x axis is KX

The hydraulic gradients along the coordinate systems (L, Iy and LJ were selectedbased on Site measurements for the three flow sections described above. Table 3-5includes the specific ranges used for the definition of the triangular distributions.

May 23,1993 Colder Associates

May 1993 L-7 923-6053

A retardation factor (R) was considered to range from 1.2 to 2 with a mostprobable value of 1.8). This factor is in<transport as discussed in text Section 44probable value of 1.8). This factor is included in order to estimate constituent

The groundwater flow velocities (V Vy and VJ were calculated using theformulae presented earlier in this section.

The solute velocities (VS,,, VSy, and VSJ were calculated with the formulae:

VSX = RVXVSy = RVy

= RV2

The input data and the average results of Monte Carlo simulations are includedin Table 3-5 and Figures L-4 to L-13 include graphs of the probability distributionsof groundwater and VOC velocities. ,

.'-' • • ' • ' . •"'•'• '' ' : • " ' - ••'•': : ". . VMay 23,1993 Colder Associates

i11!

?§'.:x:!:!.:.!:-"Bt '-.'-.'I

f,.,,...,,,.,,.,,,,,,.,,:-«:

:,.r-¥:W::;.:-:-:.x.::->:— .-ffi;;sg-:»§;S:J;;s«* ?t::;::::S.:;mmSS»:;::?>*:3S

i

iifffliSiilIIP1

8

m _£

<« c"

N

52 z

^ < < <«" z r^ r<

«i

!•

CT»

CO.or

I8 2 ° £6 0 o

* 8. ^o o o

"5"S i

"i

m

m

11i

UJ.

25

S 3 S ' - S

I ix—S

i : • • - . . • • • • . . • ' - - - . . • : . . . • : • • ' . - . 1} AR3059lt5 I

-'•'.••; . ^ '• '':. .' ; . ' • . •• » .

Ld. _ IOz:"0— iLi- oC£ TLjJ CMh= V<•<C 5^ QQ .?.-7T OJZ- 0

o IfV !£

°ILJ- p0 u.__0H-•<£rv<>.

0 /m o,oP • : .»—

£ ' «\ 'CM

• •• 5 ' • - ••''•• 'x.. . . . •*:.

''.1 ' ' . ' . , • ' . '

' • . " • '. . ' • _ . i . .

• . ' ' . • - , . - -

» i . ,

V 1

i i r0 0 0 0tO tfJ • ««r KJ

-

.s* '• ' ' '

^ Hi. LJh

U1

•5

' II

o .0 ^00 iS < o

H O05 5isCO 0

o .y ujUJ -.3C g

en 2 2LU •*- O

LU 3 UJ0 U. OC

-* ^_ a 5' ' •' 1 " 5 <

1 ^ Q 3• • . • - -HI '5 2 S- •• '- 1 < §g ••• •'

§51 gfeJj o • uj ul

. . i_ A

., ' . -t

. • . - . .—————— : ————————— i

i i

u. iO H

I UJg

is< p UD< -3-

J O - -J ^-^J u QJ enCC LO

c~>o o o ^CM - CC

. . ' . ' . ' - « S TANGLE OF GROUNDWATER FLOW IN SANDSTONE STRATA

RELATIVE TO THE PERPENDICULAR DIRECTION TO THE GEOLOGIC CONTACT

ANGLE a2 (DEGREES)

JOB NO 923-6053 x"* N/A"" EAM OATC 05/10/93CMKrr •: 5^f g"J2//1) *****'• PA02-201REV BY: £Af- r/a> / 9 7 °" s"8711111 03

Golder Associates

VARIATION OF GROUNDWATERFLOW ANGLE AS FUNCTION OF

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY RATIOSncoRE

ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL L-1

•

. -30)Cg2q>5 J ———————

- '

_ooo(U-*->'Co2IIDC

~QEDCO

c0-*-'o

. -,,-^CO

COo:@

0oo JIIJOo1-

>=«=

LUX^

1

'

•

1 ^ I ^ **

TJ CD- rvS || CN 0- Jj- OU — l£>(D D -L.Q. CO .X <P CNLJ 01 . -

*»*>••• 923-6053°" •*' • WME '«c B* TAVt*

R£V 8T: &&F

.

.

.

. •

•

.

.'

'•-

.,

'•,

'

.

•

1

_

'..

•

•

1

•

1

i

.

.

.

. ' ' . . ' . .

'

'

•

i**

3

ooCO- ro" in

CNm

- h-* ==n o

cID

~ *~- i4"i»SSj <'

JJJJ2J"M o^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

.

^ ^(D . CM

.

scMfc N/Ao* : 04/21/94nun*.: 202M SUBTtnC: Q3

Gdder Associates

•

m CM

(0<u

••••i••• ^•

iOCN . .

• ' . •

rO_ t — ' .

(*•»»•

«H

KO ^bN &\ O00 ^ ; ^

ivOQ. ({py^

Vt

UJ\s1woz .2^5o13Q

i2a\ ^

. <^tt^I

i>5O rUJ. _.H O8-v'^ {

c*Q«

'<\ \ T1 Cj \J<*

*

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OF

r ,

tr

•.

i

EQUIVALENT HYDRAULIC JCONDUCTIVITY OF AN s—ANISOTROPIC AQUIFER

ELIZABEJHTOWN LANDFILL """ L-2

• •

j • .'

'

1J

- 1

"os*. g _1

o•£DO.CD-*— >C0J

IIDC

'*

QEDCO

CO•~1*-*DECO

coo:©

0oomIICO

•£1—

>=tfc

'

LUM

•

'

.

-

"

'

•

•

'

5 CD ^o

1~1 °X 0}.. "LJ o:

JOB *., 923-6053y0""* WME°*'* vGREvBYi /fi&C

•

i

' * ' V

. " -

•;

•

'- N

•

' - ,

.• . N

•

. '

'••

< - ' • ' .

'

- ' . '. .

'

'

•

y

M

k ^ID; CM

. ; ' •"

K*11- N/ADATE - 04/21/64

nx NO.: . 203OR suenni: Q3

Gdder Associates

' i

'i .

-

•m

- v :-

_

.•

"•

__- •"

''

.

:

•

'

™.

^

t**

E

' £

COCO .

• ~CMm -3

j =~~ P" q_)K) 0

_c^D

1TO <l

Om *~

- cCM '"

CO<D

CO -^J O

- 01 >•

1 —

/

CM- fO

*"•

tO "- r;

*

t ^\ m ^

lo io &

, 00 ^ ° '

' - . . • ' • ' • ' ' ' ' ' ' • • : - !

^

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTKEQUIVALENT HYDRAUI

n

• ' '

UJ

1f 0.oDOUJCO

OC535zUJ0.OCUJ8:>-tl~3O2OOO

'" " ' •• 3 ' .OCIUJ10 ,

1fs <

* cB

\ A

5NOFLIC

CONDUCTIVITY OF ANANISOTROPIC AQUIFER

ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL " L-3

X)

r»M|*D3w

C

923-6053°" ** WMEOK

SE» BY:

swtfc04/21/94

nt 204M SUB711U: Q3

Gcdder Associates

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OrGROUNDWATER VELOCITY INFLOW ZONES 1, 2 AND 3

ELI2ABETHTOWN LANDFILL L-4

oininoC*3

«e He.: 923-6053WME

<XK BY:

BY:

N/A04/21/94

HIE Me.: 205

OR SUBK1U: Q3

Gdder Associates

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OFGROUNDWATER VELOCITY.

PERPENDICULAR TO THE STRIKE INTHE RECHARGE ZONE


f • •'

V

"o2

: • '

~0Q) III _^» •'

'• "'-v' ' -. '• ' -" ••'•'•". ''••'' .

oaOCD-4— '•Co

II. DC

"5EaCO

, c-t— •_DDECO

CO.a:

oo0in

IIJOo1—

CM

<

,

.

,

'

,

,

0 ^•n °LJ CN

TV -«-* 'CD 3 °T

: Q. co IDx <u }-LJ ££

J0t"*: 923-6053a*8* WMECWBT: (t.

REV BY-. /T/y

"

I . ..•

_

- -

•

'

. "

'

"

-

1

.

_

" "

•

^

'.

'

"

_

,

-

•'

•

• • .'

mm

:

f•

.

,

•—

..

-

mmm'mmmmmm

mmmmmmm

1 t • 1

wgmmmmg^mmmmmmmmmmmmt

ID CM

CTAlf' IJ / j\rijr -1L W/M

wit 04/21/94«r*~ 200OR SUBTinl: Q3

Gdder Associates

- • - * o : ,]S\ S\ (00 h

e5• a> iO >0 HrO t

I_^S •"•: - ysstn §,

-CMCM co

CD

. £.!'~ M "o •

-4— '.' ' '. '-' 'U

0 <oCM

m >_ CM

;;'"" -S-i_

m .-'h-., '"

O^ I/D '. . .- .•_ .-c:

, 0=

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OFGROUNDWATER VELOCITY PERPENDICUL/TO THE STRIKE IN THE MID ZONE BETWEfcRECHARGE AND DISCHARGE ZONESELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL "* L-6

J

B»

>k

/

N>

APR291994

* "3

JOB No.: 923-6053WME

IttVBY:

N/ADATC: 04/21/84ntt no.: 207OR SUBimjt: 03

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OFVERTICAL GROUNDWATER VELOCITY

IN THE RECHARGE ZONEGolder Associates ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL

ncuRC L-7

APR 2 9 1994

c*Ifairc:oooc

JM Mo.: 923-6053ORB* WMEO* BYr

sc*i£:OA1t -04/21/94

,208OR suaiuiE: 03

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OFVERTICAL GROUNDWATER VELOClfj

IN THE DISCHARGE ZONEGdder Associates FWURt


' ' • ' • ' . ' . ' ' h .;. . . : . . - . . ' • . «o: - ' , . • . . . ' . ,. r-«> -^

"»o>S

1

, _oDOCDC0^

IIDC•

QEoCO

• co•*--5

ECO

CO

@

.00omll_co.2Ki '"•te

COX>IICMX* 0

IIX/)

•

'

V-..V

1 '

. ' '•

•

•

* . '

•

.

.

•

••

1

<

•

..

'

.

.

'

.

"•

\•

..

'

,

•

.

«™

]1ii1e

-==. . . . . . i

• , • • 'mmmm

CM t

IOm >- f> —

~- "CD0

(~) • —_ m ^~^-<— co

CD.DOin >

_CM"~ D

• DU

0 <O

m— fv.

o^ m

1 I • |I I |

^ k &? . ie ' "' ' iUP"g ' „ S ° ''••*> csi ^ fr5 • . o -' -2 JL co ^ "~ "~ °° ~CD D t • APRQ. en T- :x CD CNLJ Q:

j, •

•

XCO ,

>-n

CO -

Xm'

minc:cr,cc

291994

"«T C23-6053 *** K/A PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OFOR BY. WME M* 04/21/94 VOC VELOCITY ALONG STRIKE IN THE°*"* 'fr>M- l""*!- 209 FLOW ZONESREV BY: ^ ORSueniU: 03 1 , 2 AND 3

Golder Associates ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL L-9

JOB No.: 923-6053OR BY: WMECM( 8T-.

REVBT:

SOU:

04/21/94210

OR SUBTI1U: 03

Odder Associates

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OFVOC VELOCITY PERPENDICULAR 1THE STRIKE IN THE RECHARGE ZONE*

. TOURE


• • . ' • ' . -' ' .- 1 • .'•• -

• '

•

•

*o0)££

_oDOCDcO^

IID•c« ^

QEDCO

c:o

3ECO

COcr

a0o10II_co. gK

> ^fe

CM—03

' ,' ,'•. .,.

- r

,'•

.- '

':

•

•

, •. •

'-

• •

1

.

.

- COf• o £r-v i

' ••

• .'• -

-.' '

. .'

"

.

1

< fY*» '« '«fe l? llX*

"S S ° UD CNJ~ II U^ CM T— ..*•"••-

&'"5 ^ '-.CL CO COX <D CMLJ C£

*•«« 823-6053 sc*lt • • ' N/A""• WME OA1I:: -04/21/84CMK B* /77)/)/f, m£«o: 211

REV Bti / W/1" W S1*1*111: 03

Colder Associates

.1

' .. '•

., •

. •'

'. '

- " • 1

I

•••| |

i

•^— • ' F

CM \±

"5?rO

m - 1^ —

*" <Doo •—_ m ^"^*— co

CD^Om >

_ CN^ a

. DU

• -*»

0 <O

_ •

o- m

m

'.r-i

^ON OX Oco J-

APR2

. • - ' '

'"- '. '- ,-

. .

CO

. : .

'-' VLCLC

.' - :. , ct

•-•

9 W94

,PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OF

VOC VELOCITY PERPENDICULAR TOTHE STRIKE IN THE MID ZONEBETWEENRECHARGE AND DISCHARGE ZONESELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL

FIGURE

L-11

.

)•*}3"5•

t

o

co J- m•<— co_ _ . C D

IIDC

"Q.EDCO

Q

II_coo

OOCM

CMm x"~ 13o

Om >

U<

to

oco0=

JOB Mo.: 923-6053OR BY. WME

REVB*

SCAlf:

04/21/94

OR SUBTIIlf; 03

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OFVERTICAL VOC VELOCITY212 IN THE RECHARGE ZONE

Gdder Associates ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILLFIGURE

L-12

Q}O>

o,CD"co

Q.E

CO

E

CO

ooom•IIjoo

rOM

C0|

CD D .Q. CO T—

l2<r^

r\t ON °x °N• J^N O <D CN ON|| J_f CN • r- t- CO

(D0 £o pCM t

u71-m xr^ _"~ CDo

incoCD

"- O

O <__ O co

T— N. CO

aif.aIT

•»*«•'. . 823-6053OR rn WMEO«C BY:

REVBYi

SCAIE:

04/21/84

OR suenni: 03

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OFVERTICAL VOC VELOCITYIN THE DISCHARGE ZONE

Gdder Associates ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILLFKURC

L--1.3

,G

APPENDIX M

WETLANDS REPORT ADDENDA

AR305959

OO

UNTIED (BTATC8DMFK3NMEffT/UTPRC>rccnON AGENCYREGION III

841 Chestnut BundingPliHadeipNa, Pennsylvania 10107

December 30, 1992

Mr. Glen A. Schultfc WMWAPro j act Manager _ . wwiviin/-\Waste Management of North America, Inc. i»iin» MMEnvironmental Management Department JAN u 7 19331121 Bordentown RoadHorrisville, PA 19067 NER-EMD

Re: Elizabethtown Landfill BiteWetlands and Cultural Assessment for RI/F6 .

- ". • ' \ ' • • f •Dear Glen:

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other FederalAgencies have completed their review of your Wetlands and CulturalAssessment, which is dated October 1, 1992. On behalf of NOAA,USFWS, and EPA, I offer the following commentst• Figure 6 must be resubmitted in black and white print such thatwetland plant communities and land uses are clearly depicted.• The habitat evaluation over-emphasizes species of concern and•limits discussion to endangered, threatened, rare, and at riskspecies. The ecological impact evaluation must include all habitattypes and wildlife species likely to occur in the site area. Also,the impact evaluation must include a nore comprehensive summary onthe total value of the area to wildlife use*• Regarding rare and endangered species (page 10), in accordancewith Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat, 884,as amended; 16 u.s.c. 1531 et Beg.) 6CA must contact the U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service for information on the presence of federallylisted or proposed endangered and threatened species within thearea potentially affected by .site contamination or remedialactions. , For the Elizabethtown Site you can write tot

Mr. Charles Kulp ,us Fish and Wildlife ServiceSuite 322, 3IS South Alien StreetState College, PA 16801

£-98* 8U 825 4336 fl R jDB-feQgC O3:51 Pi! P004 802

xi/.OA«*-OA-»-Hv)00 JHN US SO ib^l NO .009 P.05

These comments must' be fully addressed in the Wetlands andiral Assessment Section of your Draft RI Report.

have any questions on the comments please contact me.Cultural Assessment Section of your J>raft RI Report. Should you ! )

sincerely yours,

Project Manage

R-98X 814 825 *34 R 3 0 5 9%'f "93 03:5tPM P005

WaKriTECHNOLOGYTlNC.

- Specializing in Assessment. Design. Restoration. Construction and Management of Wetland/Stream, and Riparian Systems

March 22, 1993

Mr. Geoffrey Forrest - c \c$3Golder Associates Inc. V^ * " , • • •305 Fellowship Road, Suite 200Mt Laurel, NJ 08054

' . ' ' Re: Elizabethtown LandfillWetlands and Cultural Assessment Study

Dear Geoff:

Please find enclosed our revisions to the above report in response to your letter ofJanuary 22, 1993. Specifically, these revisions are as follow?: .

1. . Figure 6 has been prepared on a black and white map to replace the originalcolor photos used, in the report.

2. Pages 8, 9 and 10 of the report have been revised to include a summary ofimpact on wildlife and reference to U.S. Fish and .Wildlife Servicecorrespondence regarding endangered species.

,3. A copy of February 17, 1993 correspondence from the U.S. Fish and WildlifeService is provided. This should be included in Appendix D.

I trust this response fulfills the needs expressed. If you have any questions, pleasecall.

Very truly yours,

PL. Ri. Terry A. RightnourVice PresidentWATER'S EDGETECHNOLOGY, INC.

TAR/klb JEnclosures: Revised pages 8, 9 & 10

Figure 6U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services Correspondence

mar93\Forrest

0 STATI COiUGt OffKl 118 Boalsburg Rood • P.O. Box 969 • Lemont. PA 16851-0969 . (814)238-5225 FAX (814) 234-8086Washington Ave. 81 Graham St. • P.O. Box 490 • R/<ee.'f4Tl<I?/t§ r W4) 765-4320 FAX (814) 765-2511

within the study boundaries is characterized by a forested flood plain. Wildlife reportedfrom the PA Fish and Wildlife Database for streams potentially included 142 species. Asmall groundwater discharge was observed in the tributary on the northwest edge of thelandfill, but other habitat characteristics appeared consistent with off-site areas.

A review of the data suggests that there are no apparent differences in the habitatson the landfill and off-site habitats. Vegetative structure and potential habitat use in theseareas are similar.

I - ; • . . ' - •' ' -

A variety of wildlife species could be expected to use the forested wetlands andriverine habitats. The riparian zones of the streams probably support mammalian predatorssuch as raccoon, mink, and shrews, avian predators such as egrets, hawks, and owls, andherpetofauna such as turtles, snakes, and frogs. Although most of the upland and wetlandhabitats occur in relatively small patches, those that occur may support up to 17 of thelisted 30 species of concern identified by the Database. Their occurrence, however, is notlikely in most cases due to fragmented habitats in proximity to urbanizing areas. Asindicted in SUBTASK 5, no known habitats for State or Federal threatened or endangeredspecies exist within the study area according to the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Resources and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ,

In summary, when wildlife use is considered in total for the entire site, relatively fewspecies or individuals are at risk. The interspersion of forested hedgerows and fields wouldsupport a diversity of farmland wildlife such as cottontail* ring-neck pheasant, meadowvoles, and several species of sparrow, The mature upland forests would support squirrels,woodpeckers, and breeding songbirds. Large mammals (e.g.» deer, raccoon, red fox) andpredatory birds (e.g., American kestrel, owls, crows) are likely to roam throughout the siteand surrounding properties.

The aquatic habitats on site and in the vicinity (streams, Conoy Creek, wetlands) willsupport a typical array of herpetofauna (e.g., frogs, salamanders, snakes, turtles) andwetland-dependent birds and mammals. Large species occupying riparian areas (e.g.raccoons, herons) are likely to move along the wooded stream corridors seldomconcentrating in one area, whereas smaller species will remain relatively stationary. Exceptfor a few small riparian and aquatic species that might occupy the small wooded corridorswhere water quality is affected, the overall risk to wildlife from the landfill appears to beminor. ' ;

, SUBTASK 5 - CULTURAL AND OTHER ASSESSMENTS• - . . . • • ' ' - r i •

Methodology .

Written assessment and confirmation was requested and obtained from State andFederal agencies to identify any cultural and other environmental concerns in and aroundthe study area. These included requests for FEMA flood plain mapping, a PADER PNDI(Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory) search for threatened and endangered species,a review by the PA Historical and Museum Commission, a review by local historic

-8-

AR305963

•>organizations, a review of Soil Conservation Service prime farmland and other farmland forsignificant agricultural lands, and review of wild and scenic rivers, wilderness areas andwildlife refuges via the PADER, Federal Wildlife Service, and Department of Agriculture.

The following is a summary of responses obtained from the agency requests. Copies: of the letters of request and responses are provided in-Appendix D.

Results

Koodplains - West Donegal Township and the Elizabethtown Borough werecontacted for available information on flood plain mapping. The Township had conducteda flood plain study for Conoy Creek under the National Flood Insurance Program; however,the detailed part of this study ended approximately 1.8 miles downstream of the study area.Mapping for Elizabethtown Borough was available from the Borough offices and coveredthe northeastern section of the study area (upstream) as shown on Figure 7.

Because of the discontinuity of the FEMA'floodplain information in the vicinity of. the study area, additional inquiries were made to resource agencies and consulting firms to

ascertain the availability of floodplain data for this section of Conoy Creek. Initial contact, was made to Gannett-Fleming, who performed the floodplain study for the Borough during

the early 1970's. Water's Edge Technology, Inc. was informed that all files were forwardedto FEMA upon completion of the work. A letter request was thereafter sent to Mrs. MaryPajak of the Risk Study Division of FEMA, the agency responsible for maintaining thehydrology data, work maps and other data which were used in completing the FEMA floodplain mapping studies. The Risk Study Division subsequently referred us to Mrs. Tracy

I ] Trainer of Dewberry and Davis, a government contractor in charge of researching the- Elizabethtown files for the requested information. On July 23, 1992 Water's Edge was

notified by phone that no additional flood plain mapping was available for the study area.

Additional contact was made wim the Elizabethtown Borough Sewage TreatmentPlant, located approximately one-half (1/2) mile downstream of the study area, for anyfloodplain data required under the Pennsylvania Sewage Facilities Act 537. The responsefrom the Borough and subsequent requests to the Borough's consultants found no FEMAor other detailed floodplain maps available for the study area. • '

Further contact was made with the PA Department of Transportation to inquire ifany flood calculations/elevations were available for the State Route 241 bridge located onthe southwestern section of the study area. No flood elevations in the vicinity of .the bridgewere available from this agency's files.

The only floodplain map found available for the study area was a 7.5' topographicmap showing the 100-year floodplain for the Elizabethtown Quadrangle. This work wascompleted by the U.S. Geological Survey at the request of H.U.D. in order to assess floodinsurance in the absence of more detailed studies (i.e., FEMA maps). The ElizabethtownQuadrangle was completed in 1973, before either the West Donegal Township orElizabethtown FEMA studies were completed. Without detailed studies, the U.S.G.S. used

i .AR30596<<

what limited information was available (high water marks, known flood extents) to show theflood prone areas. The Flood Prone Boundary line shown on Figure 8 is broadly delineatedand was intended as a general reference to the extent of the 100 year floodplain.

' ' ' • • "*

To provide a larger scale approximation of the floodplain in the study area,approximate locations of the upstream FEMA floodplain boundaries were located in thefield during the site investigation. From estimates of this boundary from available mappingand photogrammetric contour maps of the study area, the 100 year floodplain wasdetermined to be near the 400 foot elevation contour upstream of the study area. For thepurposes of this study, a projection of this floodplain elevation was made downstreamthrough the study area as depicted on Figure 11. The gradient drop in the floodplainelevation was projected.to be the same as the elevation change in the streambed profile ,.within the study area.

Both the U.S.G.S. Flood Prone Area and the project FEMA flood boundarycorrespond closely and were found to fall outside the footprint of the landfill area.

Rare and Endangered Species - According to the PADER Bureau of Forestry andU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, there are no known habitats for threatened or endangeredspecies within the study area. .

Wfld and Scenic Rivers-The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources'Division of Rivers and Wetlands Conservation does not list Conoy Creek as a wild orscenic river. , ( J

Prime Farmland - Two (2) soil types within the study area are considered primefarmland by the Lancaster County SCS. These consist of the Lansdale Loam, 3 to 8 percentslopes, and the Rowland Silt Loam. These soils cover approximately 48 acres of the studyarea with the majority, 32 acres, occurring adjacent to and north of Conoy Creek inforestland, fallow fields, and residential areas (Figure 9). The remaining 16 acres of primefarmland occur within the northeast and southwest portions of the study area and arecurrently in agricultural use. . • .' -

Wilderness Areas and Wildlife Refuges - No known wilderness areas or wildliferefuges were found to exist within or adjacent to the study area.

Historical Resources - The Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission doesnot list any historical structures in the vicinity of the study area. The Commission does,however, consider the area to have a high probability for archaeological resources. Thiscorrespondence implies that prior to any major works in the study area, the applicant shouldrequest and receive additional clearance for archaeologic reconnaissance prior todisturbance. :. < .

-10-

Aft305965

United States Department of tlie InteriorFISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Suite 322 .315 South Alien Street

State College, Pennsylvania 16801. • • • . •

February 17, 1993v u . ( • ' . •

Mr. Terry HarrisWater's Edge Technology, Inc.Clearfield OfficeWashington Avenue & Graham StreetP.O. Box 490Hyde, PA 16843

Dear Mr. Harris:

This responds to your letter of February 11, 1993 .requesting information about federally listedor proposed endangered and threatened species within the area affected by the ElizabethtownLandfill located in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.

Except for occasional transient species, no federally listed or proposed threatened orendangered species under our jurisdiction are known to exist in the project impact area.Therefore, no Biological Assessment or further Section 7 consultation under the EndangeredSpecies Act (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is required with the fish andWildlife Service. Should project plans change, or if additional information on listed or proposedspecies becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. A compilation of federallylisted endangered and threatened species in Pennsylvania is enclosed for your information.

'• •' • . ' '

This response relates only to endangered or threatened species under our jurisdiction based onan office review of the proposed project's location. No field inspection of the project area hasbeen conducted by this office.* Consequently, this letter is not to be construed as addressingother Service concerns under the Rsh and Wildlife Coordination Act or other legislation.

Federal Candidate and State-listed Species

Candidate species are species under consideration by the Service for possible inclusion on theFederal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Because many of these speciesare known to have suffered population declines, the Service encourages federal agencies andOther planners to consider candidate species when planning and implementing their projects.

The Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) is maintained by the PennsylvaniaDepartment of Environmental Resources, The Nature Conservancy and the WesternPennsylvania Conservancy. The Pennsylvania Fish and Wildlife Database is maintained by thePennsylvania Game Commission. These databases contain the most up-to-date informationabout candidate and State-listed species in Pennsylvania. Requests for a PNDI review for thepresence of candidate and State-listed species, as well as other natural resources of specialconcern, should be directed to:

AR305966

. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ResourcesBureau of ForestryDivision of Forest Advisory ServicesP.O. Box 8552Harrisburg, PA 17105-8552

Requests for a review of the Pennsylvania Fish and Wildlife Database should bo directed to:

Pennsylvania Game CommissionBureau of Land ManagementDivision of Wildlife Data Base

• . 2001 Elmerton AvenueHarrisburg, PA 17110-9797

Should the data search reveal the presence of any candidate species on the site, the Serviceshould be contacted to ensure that these species ara not adversely affected by projectactivities. . •

Requests for information regarding State-listed endangered or threatened species should bedirected to the Pennsylvania Game Commission (birds and mammals), the Pennsylvania Fishand Boat Commission (fish, reptiles, and amphibians), and the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Resources (plants). .

Please contact Philip Edmunds of my staff at 814-234-4090 if you have any questions or •require further assistance regarding endangered, threatened, or candidate species.

Sincerely,

Charles J. KjSupervi

Enclosure

AR305967

FEDERALLY LISTED ENDANGERED SPECIES IN PENNSYLVANIA\ " ' ' - " • ' * '

COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS* DISTRIBUTIONFISHES ... . _ '• : . "- -.'.. . _ . - ' - ',. • . . . ' " •'_Shortnose sturgeon" Acipenser trevirostrum E Delaware River and other Atlantic

; coastal watersREPTILES & AMPHIBIANS

- None - . • ; ' " " , . . ' - ' • ' . .

- ' BIRDS - . . , . ' • ' '",.'• , ' • • " . • . . - . • • • •Bah) eagle Haffaeftus toucocephakts . E Entire state-recent nesting in Butler.

Crawford, Dauphin, Lancaster, Pike, •• . • ', Tioga, York Counties

Peregrine falcon (American) fateo peregrinus anatura E Entire state-feestablishment to former .. breeding range in progress

Peregrine falcon (Arctic) Fafco peregrinus tundrka E Entire state-migratoryPiping plover Chsradrius tnetodus E Presque Isle-no current nesting •

MAMMALS .Indiana bat Myotis todaSs E Entire state

MOU.USXSOubsheH muMel Heuroi»m* cl»v* PE French Creek and AHegheny River

watersheds; Oarion. Crawford, Erie.Forest. Mercer and Venango Counties ;

Dwarf wedge mussel Abvnfdont* hMrodon E Delaware River tfrainag«-pos*&ry/ • • . " . - • .' ., ' •• , • • . • extirpated . • . '.Farnhefl Cypmffenb $tegfri» E Ohio River drainage-poMibty extirpatedNorthern rifflesheU eptobbsm* towtou PE French Creek and Allegheny River

nnffiwit watersheds; Crawford, Erie, Forest.• Venango and Warren Counties

Orange pimptoback fkthobtsus strittus E Ohio River oVainage-poMibfr txtirpatedRnk mucket peady mussel LtmpsKs »trupt» E Onto River drainage-possibfy extirpatedRough pigtoe ftturobtma phnura E Onto River drainage-pouibty extirpated •

fLANTS '• ..' .- / ' : . - . • ' ' . ' . : ', Northeastern bulrush Sdtpta mdstrochtttus E Current • Blair, Centre. CCnton,

. / Cumberland, Dauphin, Franklin.' Huntingdon, Lackawanna, Monroe,Union Counties. Historic - Lehigh.Northampton Counties.

SmaH whorled pogonia tsotri* medeotoidts E Current - Centre and Venango Counties.Historic - Berks, Chester, Greene,Monroe, Montgomery, Philadelphia

' .'. Counties.

" E « Endangered - PE - Proposed for listing as endangered" Shoftnose sturgeon is under the jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service

The following is a partial list of species that no longer occur in Pennsylvania: gray wolf, eastern cougar, moose, bison,lynx, wolverine, passenger pigeon; Bachman's sparrow, common tern, lark sparrow, tiger salamander, mud sunfish,longjaw Cisco, lake whitefish, butterfly mussel, American burying beetle, precious undenting moth. Kamer bluebutterfly. American barberry, small whjte lady's-siipper, eastern prairie fringed orchid, Virginia spiraea, etc, etc.

AR305968

APPENDIX Nt

SUMMARY OF DETECTED ANALYTES

(UNCENSORED DATA SET)

AR305970

April 1994 __________________________ _ _____ 923-6053

ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

NOTES AND EXPLANATIONS• -. " • . • . ; - ,1. Groundwater sample point designations, can be divided into three groups:

a. downgradient wells have the prefix "ED" followed by the well, number;

b. upgradient wells have the prefix "EU" except well ETJ05 which wasdetermined to be a downgradient well;

c. residential wells have the prefix "RES"; Masonic Homes wells havethe prefix "EM"; Willowood Swim dub well has the designation"WILWDV

2. Surface water primary sample designation consists of the prefix "SW"followed by the sample number. •

3. Surface soil primary sample designation has the prefix "SS" followed by thesample number.

4 Sediments primary sample designation begins with the prefix "SED"followed by the sample number. .

' ' • • • - - - ' : • . • • •5. The following is the list of designations for leachate samples.

EMHLT - 1AT (8/26/92) Eastern header, low flow • TCLPEMHHT - 1 AT (9/10/92) High flow, sump - TCLPEMHLTS - 1AT (10-30792) Low flow, sump - TCLP.EMHLTW/1A (10/30/92) Western header pipe, low flowEMHLT/1A (8/26/92 Eastern header, low flow \EMHOiyiQ (4/26/93) Sump sample split with EPA. Analyzed

for pesticides only.

6. Generally the primary sample Designations are followed by VIA", TIB" orTIC which denoted the Phase 1A, IB and 1C sample event respectively.

7. If the sample is not a primary sample, the follow suffix was added to thesample designation: .

- Field duplicate sample;.RE- Re-extracted and/or re-analyzed primary sample;FR - Re-extracted and/or re-analyzed field duplicate sample;RB - Resampled Phase IB primary sample; andRR- Re-extracted and/or re-analyzed primary sample from the

resampling event •'..'.

Colder Associates AR30597I

April 1994___________-. '-'•*'. -' -2- v "-' _______ 923-6053- ' . . . . . •

8. The Qual column indicates the qualifier applied to the result following datavalidation (see below).

. '''Qualifiers: • : ' "•''.'•; ' \ ', ..^.-\ jno code- Confirmed Identification

B - • • • Present in Associated Blanks (Semiquantitative Data)J- Estimated (Semiquantitative) DataK- Biased Higji (Semiquantitative) Data

. L- Biased Low (Semiquantitative) DataN- Tentative IdentificationR- Unusable Data .U- Not Detected/Quantitative Data

,UJ- Not Detected/Estimated DataUL- Not Detected/Biased Low*•- Indicates Result Below Laboratory MDL

9. EPA split results are not presented in this Appendix.

10. For non-detected results, rejected results, or results qualified due to blankcontamination, the numerical value of the result is not reported and theresult is shown s -(U), -(UL), -(UJ)/ -(R) or -(B).

11. This Appendix presents all the qualified results for analytes detected in theprimary samples, re-analyzed samples, field duplicate samples and re-collected samples. The pesticide data presented in this Appendix areUNCENSORED results.


Appendix Nl

Phase 1A Sampling Event ; j

APRIL 1994 923-6053

TABLE 1A-1DETECTED VOLATILE AND

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ATELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTS

PHASE 1A-GROUNDWATER

liiiiivvVVV

SSSSSS

VVVV

SSSSS

VV.'.••• ' , '.' :::

VVV"?•'?'•-: '':'•'.'••• ':-•:'

Total XylenesChloroethaneChlorobenzeneBenzene1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene

. •.bis(2-Chloroethyl)etherFluoreneNaphthaleneDibenzofuran2-ChlorophenolAcenaphtheneTOTAL VOOs/SEMlVOCsChlorobenzene .ChloroethaneBenzene1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene

NaphthaleneFluorene .Acenaphthenebis(2-Chloroethyl)etherDibenzofuranTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzeneChloroethaneTOTAL VOCs/SEMlVOCsBenzeneChlorobenzeneChloroethaneTOTAt VOCs/SEMIVOCs

siMiiiiiJtittED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1A

ED02FV1AED02R/1A .ED02R/1A-ED02R/1A . .ED02R/1AED02R/1A

' • .ED02R/FDED02R/FD.ED02R/FDED02R/FD

ED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FD

ED02R/FRED02R/FR

ED02R/REED02R/REED02R/RE

BiSllil

1038620129

110.86

0.60.90.9

70946024710

811150.8

526.6540425821559037

- 642"

J

JJJJJJ

J

J

JJJJ

J

J

FORM: V « VOCs; S » SEMlVQCs

AR305974*file:4TAB1A-1.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATES . page 1 of 3

APRIL 1994 . . 923-6053

TABLE 1A-1DETECTED VOLATILE AND .


PHASE 1A - GROUNDWATER

iiii»irt ^VVVVVV

ssVV

VVVV

ssVVVVVVVVVVVVV

sss- '. ''••'• . » '

Benzenecis-1 ,2-DichloroethenaChlorobenzene1 ,2-Dibromo-3-ChIoropropane1,1-DichloroethaneChloroethane

2-Chlorophenol4-ChloroanilineTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzene1,1-DichloroethaneTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1,1-Dichloroethane .cis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneBenzeneChlorobenzene

Pentachlorophenolbis(2-Chloroethyl)elherTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1,1-Dichloroethane1,1,1 -Trichlofoethane1,2-DichloropropaneAcetoneChloroethaneChlorobenzene1 ,2-DichIoroethandBenzenetrans-1 ,2-DichloroetheneVinyl ChlorideTrichloroetheneTetrachloroethenacis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

PhenolDimethyl PhthalateN-NitrosodiphenylamineTOTALVOCs/SEMIVOCs

siMiiiMiiiiED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1A

ED05R/1AED05R/1A.. •- '"": :••;•;' 'ED05R/REED05R/RE

ED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1 A

ED08R/1AED08R/1A

ED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1A ,ED09R/1AEDQ9R/1AEDQ9R71AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1A

ED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1A

I181Mrooip45

3608193

11

./.::::.v4oi''36022

T382433

110

0.53

123,5460.9293

1505

• '• .3142210

412

244.95

QiiiijjjjjjK: :?:':':••.' •'"•

J.'••••-!:V. •:••':•• ,';

J -

J

J

J

K

JJ

J

J

J

JJJ.'• '": :'*• ."•'

FORM: V = VOCs; S a S EM I VOC s

AR305975file:4TAB1A-1.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATES page 2 of 3

APRIL 1994 .:.. 4 . . ( N 923-6053

TABLE 1A-1-**' DETECTED VOLATILE ANDrSEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AT, .ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING,f?0|NTS:••'.*'' PHASE 1A-GROUNDWATER

VVVVVV

VVVV

sss

VV

VVVVVV

Benzene ED09R/REcis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene ED09R/REChlorobenzene ED09R/RE1,1-Dichloroethane ED09R/REVinyl Chloride ED09R/RE1 ,2-Dichloroethane

Chlorobenzene ED10I/1A1,1-DichloroethaneBenzeneChloroethane

2-Chlorophenolbis(2-ChloroethyOetherDimethyl PhthalateN-Nitrosodtphenylamine

ChloroethaneBenzeneChlorobenzene

cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene1,1-DichloroethaneTrichloroetheneBenzene1 ,2-DichloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzene

bis(2-Ch!oroethy1)ether

4-MethylphenolDimethyl PhthalateTCTAtVOCs/SEMIVOCs

ED09R/RE

ED 101/1 AED 101/1 AED 101/1 A

ED 101/1 AED 101/1 AED 101/1 AED 101/1 A

ED10I/REED10I/REED10I/RE

ED12I/1AEDI 21/1 AED12I/1AED 121/1 AED 121/1 AED 121/1 AED12I/1A

ED 121/1 A

EU14D/1AEU14D/1A

* FORM: V m VOCs; S «= SEMIVOCS

file:4TAB1A-1.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCTATESV page 3 of 3

9100338

1300112034 N

0.6

5025

1100

0.70.6

1321 K

0.8

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053

TABLE1A-2DETECTED PESTICIDES AND PCBs

AT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTSPHASE 1A-GROUNDWATER

iliJWailEillll P

Heptachlor EpoxidaEndosutfan I4,4'-DDD4,4'-DDTEndrin Ketona

Heptachlor Epoxida4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDTEndrin KetonaEndrin Aldehyde

Endosulfan IDieldrin4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDT

4,4'-DDT

Heptachlor Epoxida4,4*-DDEEndosuifan U4,4'-DDD

delta-BHCEndosulfan 14,4'-DDE

4,4'-DDD4,4'-DDT

4,4'-DDDEndosulfan Sulfata4,4'-DDTMethoxychlor

SSMEiliiOlMI

ED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1 A

ED02R/REED02R/REED02R/REED02R/REED02R/RE

1

ED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FD

ED05R/1A

ED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1-A

ED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1A ,

ED 101/1 AED 101/1 A

ED10I/REED10I/REED10I/REED10I/RE

BESOM!liPlftiSl0.00080.00210.00390.011

0.00071•

0.00430.000620.00520.00190.0027

0.00210.00120.0010.012

0.0026

0.000570.00250.00190.0047

0.00130.001

0.00097

0.00510.0078

0.00670.00120.00720.022

spinH*N'N'JN"

N«N'N*N"N-

N«N«N*J

N'

N4N*N*N"

N*N*N*

N"N*

N*N"N"N'

, • rfila:TAB1A-2.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATES

OCTOBER1993 '/' 923-6053

TABLE 1A-2DETECTED PESTICIDES AND PCBs

AT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTSPHASE 1 A -GROUNDWATER

PARAMETER

Heptachlor EpoxideDieldrinEndrin4.4'-DDT

atpha-BHC

ED12I/1AED121/1AED 121/1AED12I/1A

EU14D/1A

0.000910.00190.000950.0016

0.0019

N*

file: TAB1 A-2.wk1 60LDER ASSOCIATES . Igge 2 of 2

OCTOBER 1993 ,923-6053

TABLE1A-3DETECTED TOTAL INORGANICS

AT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTSPHASE 1 A-GROUNDWATER

IliRAMEtEefli tiatiilii!ArsenicBariumCalciumCobaltIronMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumSodium

ArsenicBarium vCalciumCobaltIronMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumSodiumVanadium

ArsenicBariumCalciumCobaltIronMagnesiumManganesePotassiumSodium

'••

S1iMPJl;PJDlNlif

ED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FDED02RVFDED02R/FDED02R/FDEDQ2R/FDED02R/FD 'ED02R/FD

'ED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1AED02R/1A

ED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1AED05R/1A

HESUWiiftQWii

6.4290

17700012.89450941002240022.65560

208000

4.5489

20100015.27360

1100002030027.65480

2520005.1

15.6879

3070019

32600189004330847040800

S$AH

J

J.

f

J

; '

file: TAB1A-3.wk1 COLDER ASSOCIATES page 1 of 3AR305979

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053

• ' '• •••• TABLE 1A-8 ' .DETECTED TOTAL INORGANICS

AT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTSPHASE 1A - GROUNDWATER

PJftMJtEiEeii

BariumCalciumCobaltIronMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumSodiumVanadium

ArsenicBariumCalciumCobaltIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumSodium

ArsenicBariumCalciumCobaltIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumSodium

BariumCalciumIronMagnesiumPotassiumSodium

SAMaraOJrJltl

ED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1AED08R/1A

ED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1AED09R/1A

ED 101/1 AEDI 01/1 AEDI 01/1 AED10I/1AED10I/1AED 101/1 AED 101/1 AED 101/1 AED10I/1AED101/1AED10I/1A

ED12I/1AED12I/1AED12I/1AED 121/1 AED121/1AED12I/1A

BESUIU!Kogvoil

1134370029.4256

22100366015.313702380045.2

5.8345603034.130507.2

10600154020.4211013200

12.6.1660

15700027.669703.9

645001170018.24290

- 72900

21779200213

1440013808950

QUAl!tiiiil

*

j

j

-

. • •

j

j

file: TAB1 A-3.wk1 ' GOLDER ASSOCIATES _ page 2 of 3

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053'' • ' • " i •

TABLE 1A-3DETECTED TOTAL INORGANICS

AT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTSPHASE 1A-GROUNDWATER

BariumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumSodium

EU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1AEU14D/1A

76.11830036.26

11.493222.8

1.350064910.5131013600

file: TAB1A-3.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATES page 3 of 3AR30598I

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053

TABLE 1A-4 ; IDETECTED TOTAL INORGANICS

AT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTSPHASE 1A - SURFACE WATER

AluminumBariumCalciumCopperIronMagnesiumManganesePotassiumZinc

BariumCalciumIronMagnesiumManganesePotassiumSodium

SWB1/1ASWB1/1ASWB1/1ASWB1/1ASWB1/1ASWB1/1ASWB1/1ASWB1/1ASWB1/1A

SWP1/1ASWP1/1ASWP1/1ASWP1/1ASWP1/1ASWP1/1ASWP1/1A

94535.7

330009.6

1310457056.4530039.7

•99.525500191

1150030.5191011100

file:TABlA-4.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATE R 3 0 5 9 8 2 page 1 of 1

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053

TABLE1A-5DETECTED VOLATILE AND

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AT v JELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTS ^

PHASE 1A-SEDIMENT

gBiiMigiMi issjiii ami2-Butanona

BurylbenzylphthalataTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs?2-ButanonaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs

SEDP1/1A

SEDP1/1A

SEDP1/FD

24

81;10524

FORM: V » VOCs; S = SEMIVOCs

file:TAB1A-5.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATES page 1 of 1

AR305983

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053

TABLE1A-6DETECTED PESTICIDES AND PCBs

AT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTSPHASE 1A- SEDIMENT

gamma-BHC4,4'-DDEEndrin4,4'-DDDEndosulfan Sulfate4,4'-DDT

gamma-BHCHeptachlor Epoxide4,4'-DDEEndrinEndosulfan IIEndosulfan Sulfate.4,4'-DDT

SEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1A

SEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FD

0.311.1

0.451.4

0.321.4

0.290.82

0.231.6

0.430.89

wwmN"

N'

file: TAB1A-6.wk1, GOLDER ASSOCIATES page 1 of 1

AR30598U

OCTOBER 1993 -. 923-6053

TABLE 1A-7DETECTED TOTAL INORGANICS . "^

AT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTS A JPHASE 1A-SEDIMENT ^

PJtiilMET HiiiiiiiiiAluminumArsenicBariumBerylliumCalciumChromigmCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumVanadium

AluminumArsenicBariumBerylliumCalcium .ChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumVanadium

:SAMp;£Eno:iNiiiSEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1A-SEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1ASEDP1/1A

SEDP1/FDSEDP1/FD .SEDP1/FD.SEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FDSEDP1/FD

RESUUi

153004.31931.1

2190259.7

16.42T200

26355049229

165033.4

148003.51801.1

237023.89.118

1970025.3333051318.5239032.3

~

,'

file:TAB1A-7.wk1 SOLDER ASSOCIATES '„„• ' pageloli1WP30S9B5-

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053

V TABLE1A-8DETECTED VOLATILE AND


PHASE 1A-SOIL

rap!liillllsssssssssssssss

Benzo(a)PyreneBenzo(b)FluorantheneBenzo(k)FluorantheneRuoranthenePhenanthrenePhenolPyreneTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsBenzo(a)PyreneBenzo(b)RuorantheneBenzo(k)FluorantheneCarbazoleFluorantheneIndeno(l ,2,3-cd)PyrenePhenanthrenePyreneTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs

«pjiii©jiii!SS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1A•*'-:- 'j':.-<-:i:?:??:$lSS03/RESS03/RESS03/RESS03/RESS03/RESS03/RESS03/RESS03/RE; ';•'"".: ': ':'•' '•. •••'-• ':•-": ;::

iEsuiii771901901708654110

<:';i:*877.:;1002302304177375575645

<3uiiljjjjjLJ:-S':v'!-:.;::::. . ••:JJJJJJJJ

FORM: V m VOCs; S * SEMIVOCs

file: TABIA-S.wkl GOLDER ASSOCIATES page 1 of 1

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053

TABLE 1A- 9DETECTED PESTICIDES AND PCBsAT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTS

PHASE 1A-SOIL

HeptachlorAldrinHeptachlor EpoxidaDieldrin4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDEndosulfan Sulfata4,4'-DDTMethoxychlor

gamma-BHCAldrinEndrin Aldehydealpha-Chlordana

. - -gamma-BHCHeptachtorAldrinHeptachlor EpoxidaDieldrinEndrin4,4'-DDDEndosulfan Sulfataatpha-Chlordana

Heptachlor EpoxidaDieldrinEndrin

Heptachlor4,4'-DDE

4,4'-DDT

$m$MmwmSS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1A

SS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1A

SS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1A

SS04/DLSS04/DLSS04/DL

SS05/1ASS05/1A

'

SS06/1A

BiSUiliIPPiSi

0.160.120.960.963.2

0.250.252.30.53

0.420.61.31.6

0.130.180.0832.51100.860.570.360.24

2.71501.4

0.0780.58

1.9

SiliiN*N"JN*JN'N*JN*

N*JJJ

N*N*N"

JN*N*N'N*

J

N'

N*N"

J

nia:TA31A-9.wk1 COLDER ASSOCIATES page 1 of 1AR305987

OCTOBER 1993 . . ' ' • • ' 923-6053

TABLE 1A-10 «'jDETECTED TOTAL INORGANICSAT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTS

PHASE 1A- SOIL

PJP ElEB Klll

AluminumArsenicBariumBerylliumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopper :IronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumVanadiumZinc

\

AluminumArsenicBariumCalciumChromiumCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumVanadium

SS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1ASS01/1A

SS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1ASS02/1A

tES«mm189008.91471.6

181051.116,120.8

4400043.22180161020.2167053.961.5

38001.7

34.5148000

5.56.8

82105.5

293001557.2

16406.7

<!1A!II111111

,

K

K

file:TAB1A-10.wk1 COLDER ASSOCIATES page 1 of 3, AR3G5988

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053

TABLE 1A-10DETECTED TOTAL INORGANICSAT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTS

PHASE1A-SOIL

AluminumArsenicBariumBerylliumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumVanadiumZinc

AluminumArsenicBariumBerylliumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIron xLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumVanadium

SptPJllOlMi

SS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1ASS03/1A

SS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1ASS04/1A

RESUtliipgVKil13000

3138

12820051.39.639

31300119

7110, 1970

41.5168021.41060

148000.9383.90.75108015.85.47.7

134007.9

15803659.8

115023.5

mm

file: TAB1A-10.wk1 GOLDER ASSOC!A"Kaj Q c Q o n page 2 of 3

OCTOBER 1993 923-6053

TABLE1A-10DETECTED TOTAL INORGANICS

AT ELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTSPHASE 1A-SOIL

AluminumArsenicBariumBerylliumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickel •PotassiumVanadium

AluminumArsenicBariumBerylliumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseNickelPotassiumVanadium

&$K&m$miSS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1 ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1ASS05/1A

SS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1ASS06/1A

BESU11IKrtplil103003.41311

51610.96.36.5

1330024.3132010809

79417.9

157003.7

61.2'0.9

113020.18.812.6

1950012.8328033117.5148027.1

QI1A1I

-

file: TAB1A-10.wkl COLDER ASSQQWFES C Q Q n page 3 of 3

Appendix N2

Phase IB Sampling Event

AR30599I

APRIL 1994 ' 923-6053

TABLE IB-1DETECTED VOLATILE AND


PHASE 1B - GRpUNDWATER

pmVVVVV

ss>:;•;.• ./."•.•:. ... .

V

sVVVV ,

sssssV.

sssss'.-• v'': '!~-:-"\

S

VVV

s,H:,;-. .. ,

1,1-DichloroethaneChloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChlorobenzeneTrichloroethene

NaphthalenePhenolTOTAL VOCS/SEMIVOCS v1,1-Dichloroethane

Phenol .TOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs ,Chloroethane1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneBenzeneChlorobenzene

AcenaphtheneNaphthaleneDibenzofuranRuorenebis(2-Chloroethyl)etherTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzene

• • •Naphthalenebis(2-Chloroethyl)etherAcenaphtheneRuoreneDibenzofuranTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs2-ChlorophenolTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChloroethaneChlorobenzene1 ,1 -Dichloroethane

bis(2-Chloroethyl)etherTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs

Miii;i®«iiED01R/1BED01R/1BED01R/1BED01R/1BED01R/1B

ED01R/1BED01R/1B

••": ..;.:';'.,/:ED01S/1B

ED01S/1B

ED02R/1BED02R/1BED02R/1BED02R/1B

ED02R/1BED02R/1BED02R/1BED02R/1BED02R/1B

ED02R/FD

ED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FDED02R/FD

ED05R/1B

ED06R/1BED06R/1BED06R/1B

ED06R/1B

iismi• , 4

138

0.8

62

t 24;82

1•W.371010410

13

0.60.610

482.2380

• ,' 4

110.90.60.6

397.10.80 81515021

7193

J

J

JJ?. ..'".':" :>:;

J

JJJ

JJJJ

J

JJJ: •/:'.' :?-;K

J

•:"•;'••: '':'v:i

• FORM: V.= VOCs; S » SEMIVOCs

file:4TAB1B-1.wk1 GOLDER. ' page1of9

APRIL 1994 . 923-6053

^ TABLE1B-1DETECTED VOLATILE AND


PHASE IB-GROUNDWATER ,

!©RJtl1II11IvvvvvvvVvvvvVVVVV

sV

VVVVVVVVVV

VVVVV

1,1-DichloroethanaTrichloroethenaTetrachloroethenaAcetonecis-1 ,2-DIchloroethena1 ,2-DichloroethanaChlorobenzenaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1 ,4-Dichlorobenzena1 ,2-DichlorobenzenaTetrachloroethena.ChlorobenzenaTrichloroethena1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethanacis-1 ,2-DichIoroethenaBenzene • • , "Chloroethana

bis(2-Chloroethyl)etherTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzenaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsBenzene •Trichloroethena1,1-DichloroethanaTetrachloroethenaChlorobenzena1 ,2-Dichloropropanacis-1 ,2-DichloroethenaCarbon Disuifidatrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethena1 ,2-DichloroethanaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1 ,2-DichloroethanaChlorobenzenacis-1 ,2-Dichloroethena1,1-DichloroethanaBenzene •TOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs

mmmmm

ED07R/1BED07R/1BED07R/1B£D07R/1BED07R/1B ,ED07R/1BED07R/1B

ED08R/1BED08R/1BED08R/1BED03R/1BEDOSR/1BED08R/1BED08R/1BED08R/1BED08R/1BED03R/1B

ED08R/1B

ED08R/RE

ED09R/1BED09R/1BED09R/1BED09R/1BED09R/1BED09R/1BED09R/1BED09R/1BED09R/1BED09R/1B

ED09R/REED09R/REED09R/REED09R/REED09R/RE

wmmniiipiil

0.90.90.9101

0.80.715.23

0.51

. 952

0.63331

3115.11201202230191273

0.73

141.76

1106303

155

<lJlill

JJJL

JJ

J

J

J

J

J

•

J

J

JJ

J

FORM: V = VOCs; S « SEMIVOCs

fila:4TAB1B-1.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATES paga2of9

^APRIL 1994 923-6053

TABLE IB-1^ DETECTED VOLATIL|;ANDSEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ATELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTS

PHASE 1B - GROUNDWATER

iiiiilllfilivvvvvvvvVVV

ssVVVVVVVVV

*

sVVVVV.- :.'' '• • . ' ' •'

Carbon Disulf ideBenzeneChlorobenzeneTolueneTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsTolueneChlorobenzeneAcetone . "Carbon DisulfideTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzene1j1-DichloroethaneBenzene

2-Chlorophenolbis(2-Chloroethyl)etherTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1 ,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethane1,1-DichloroetheneChlorobenzeneCarbon DisulfideTrichloroetheneChloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneBenzene

bis(2-Chloroethyl)etherTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCscis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroethaneCarbon Disulfide1,1-DichloroethaneChlorobenzeneTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs

«eiii0iiitiED10D/1BED10D/1BED10D/1BED10D/1B

ED10D/REED10D/REED10D/REED10D/RE

ED10I/1BED 1 01/1 BED 1 01/1 B

ED 1 01/1 BED10I/1B

ED11D/1BED11D/1BED11D/1BED11D/1B •ED11D/1BED11D/1BED11D/1BED11D/1BED11D/1B

ED11D/1B

ED11D/REED11D/REED11D/REED11D/REED11D/RE

RESilil

20.6302

34.6241142

;59280712

21

3020.5160.7710,50.813

0.6f

0.9954481964119

JJJ

L

JJ

KJ

J

JJJJ

J

J

.

. , . . -..-

FORM: V = VOCs; S = SEMIVOCs

file: 4TAB1B-1 .wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATftR 3 0 5 9 9 U page 3 of 9

APRIL 1994 923-6053

TABLE IB -1DETECTED VOLATILE AND

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ATELIZABETHTOWN SAMPLING POINTS ' •' '\ J

PHASE IB-GROUNDWATER ^

•FORM:VaVOCs;S»SEMIVOCs

i®iiitlllliilvvVVV

sVVVV

VVV

VVVVVVVVVV

sssss; ••-•>.. •.;-•-:. . '.

VVVV

llAillMglEfl Sllli

Carbon Disulfida1,1-DichloroethanaToluenecis-1 ,2-DichloroethenaChlorobenzena

bis(2-Chloroethyl)etherTOTALVOCs/SEMlVOCSCarbon Disulfidacis-1 ,2-Dichloroethena1,1-DichloroethaneChlorobenzenaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1,1-DichloroethaneChlorobenzenaCarbon DisulfidaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1 ,2-Dichloroethana1,1-Dichloroethana4-Methyl-2-PentanonaChloroethanaTolueneBenzeneTotal XylenesChlorobenzenaAcetona2-Butanona

b!s(2-Chloroethyl)ether4-MethylphenolDi-n-butylphthalataNaphthalenePhenolTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzenaChloroethaneTolueneAcetonaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs

siMiiiiiiiiiiiiED 11 1/1 BED11I/1BED11I/1BED11I/1BED11I/1B

ED11I/1B•:;••: ' ,:'-y: • ••-. ; .:,:::•;;:..:•;;

ED11I/REED11I/REED1 1 1/REED11I/RE

ED11S/1BED11S/1BED11S/1B

ED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1B

ED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1BED12D/1B

ED12D/REED12D/REED12D/REED12D/RE

raniiiiilii!11110.72

•. 25

0.650>371924410.651

&8>23201414032

T 95230120

1816217

6739215130240477

wfflffiJJJJ" .' -• _ .: '- •,;:_.;•;

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

' '-:'' ' . - • • -

fi!a:4TAB1B-1.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATEsA R 3 0 5 9 °V paga 4 of 9

APRIL 1994 923-6053

•f ' •• • - TABLE 1B-1 Jf- • '•DETECTED VOLATILE AND



iipiiivVVVVVVVV

ss. - : . . . < .

V

VVVVVVVVVVVVV,

s:;.:;.:.VV;.;":-:.;-''::

1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene1 ,2-DichloroethaneCarbdn DisulfideChloroethane :ChlorobenzeneTolueneBenzeneTotal Xylenes

bis(2-Chloroethyl)etherDi-n-butylphthalateTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzeneTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1,1-DichloroethaneToluene1,1-DichloroetheneVinyl ChlorideCarbon DisulfideChlorobenzenecis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene1,1,1-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneEthylbenzeneBenzeneChloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethane

,- - -

bis(2-Chloroethyl)etherTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs

siMiiiiiiiHii!ED12I/1BED 1 21/1 BED12I/1BED 1 21/1 BED 1 21/1 BED 1 21/1 BED 1 21/1 BED 1 21/1 BED12I/1B

ED 1 21/1 BED12I/1B

ED12S/1B

ED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1BED13D/1B

ED13D/1B

SEsiiiii21

0.91

0.618230.50.5

1-149.50.80.8510.9

- 7, 42614181052223

0.7145.6

JJJ

JJ

JJ

J

JJJJJJ ' . -'lJJJ

J

J

FORM: V -= VOCs;. S« SEMIVOCs

• ' ' • ' /^ . . !' -

fiie:4TAB1B-1.wk1 GOLDI A^v^OSR^^ | page 5 of 9

APRIL 1994 ^ , , 923-6053

TABLE 1B-1DETECTED VOLATILE AND



PIMvvVVVVVVV .VVVV

ssVVVVVVVVVV

VVVVVVVVVV

Benzenecis-1 ,2-Dichloroethena1,1-DichloroethanaChloroethana1 ,2-DichloroethaneChlorobenzena1,1-Dichloroethena1 ,1 ,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon DisulfidaVinyl ChlorideTolueneTrichloroethenaAcetona

-_

bis(2-Chloroethyl)etherDimethyl PhthalataTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCscis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneVinyl ChlorideCarbon Disutfida1 ,2-DichloroethanaBenzene1,1-Dichloroethana1,1,1-TrichloroethanaTrichloroethenaChlorobenzena1,1-DichloroethenaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1 ,2-Dichloroethanacis-1 ,2-DichloroethenaTrichloroethenaVinyl Chloride1,1-DichloroethenaBenzeneChlorobenzena .Carbon Disulfida1,1-Dichloroethana • •1,1,1-TrichIoroethanaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs

siMREiiiiiiiiED13D/FDED13D/FDiD13D/FDED13D/FDED13D/FDED13D/FDED13D/FDED13D/FDED13D/FDED13D/FDED13D/FDED13D/FDED13D/FD

ED13D/FDED13D/FD

ED13D/FRED13D/FRED13D/FR .ED13D/FRED13D/FRED13D/FRED13D/FRED13D/FRED13D/FRED13D/FR

ED13D/REED13D/RE :ED13D/REED13D/REED13D/REED13D/REED13D/REED13D/REED13D/REED13D/RE

amiiilaliliill

33910055632439

. 77722012

30.7

399.74373244

13048311103043932213

: . - • . 49234186920194

<31ftP

JJJ

JJJJJ

JJ

JJ

JJJ .JJJJJJJ

jJJJJJJJJJ

•FORM: V =» VOCs; S a SEMIVOCs

AR305997fila:4TAB1B-1.wk1 GOLDER ASSOCIATES page 6 of 9

APRIL 1994 923-6053

TABLE1B-1 'DETECTED VOLATILE AND


PHASE 1B- GROUNDWATER

mfflmvVVVVVVVVVV

sVVVVVVV

sS c

sVVV

sK :?:!;-;*~: ;-KVV

:&K'O'$%'fC'TTtt*:&&fff:&te&yi&%te1®:i:i&ws »M! K immm smm

Benzene1,1-DichloroethaneVinyl ChlorideChlorobenzene .cis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneCarbon Disulfide1 ,2-DichloroethaneTrichloroethene1,1-DichloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane v

Dimethyl PhthalateTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzene1,1-DichloroethaneVinyl Chloride1 ,1 ,1 -TrichloroethaneBenzenecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneTrichloroetheneTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsIsophoroneDi-n-Octyl PhthalateButylbenzylphthalateTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzene . > - ,1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

~

bis(2-Chloroethyl)etherTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1,1-DichloroethaneChlorobenzeneTOTAL VOCs/SEMiVOCs

s MiiiiiiiiiiED13I/1BEDI 31/1 BED 13 1/1 BED 13 1/1 BED13I/1BED 1 31/1 BED13I/1BED13I/1BED13I/1BED 1 31/1 BED 13 1/1 B

1 • %

ED 1 31/1 B

ED18/1BED18/1BED18/1BED18/1BED18/1BED18/1BED18/1B

ED19/1BED19/1BED19/1B


•ED20/1B

ED20/REED20/RE

RESlli!Ipglpi

0.9222

-14564

- 33

0.84

0.665.37100.71

0.542

25.20.6t1

2.6311

0.6

133.6

13536

OtAllilimJ

J

J

J

J

JJJ

J

J

J

J

FORM: V *= VOCs; S « SEMIVOCs

fi!e:4TAB1B-1.wk1 GOLDERA - '• page7of9

APRIL 1994 923-6053

TABLE 18-1DETECTED VOLATILE AND



MMiflliilvvV

sVVVVVVVVVVVvsssVVVVVV&" '.-:•' ::'.':

VVVVVV

vV

i jiiiEisiiiiii ii1,1 ,1 -Trichloroethane1,1-DichloroethanaTetrachloroethenaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsbis(2-Chloroethyl)etherTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCSrTotal XylenesAcetonaToluenecis-1 ,2-Dichloroethena1,1-Dichloroethana1 ,2-Dichloroethana2-ButanonaTrichloroethenaChloroethana1,1-DichloroethenaChlorobenzenaBenzene

bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether4-MethylphenolPhenolTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChloroethanaChlorobenzenaTolueneAcetona1,1-DichloroethanaBenzeneTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs1,1-Dichloroethena1,1-Dichloroethana1,1,1-TrichloroethanaTetrachloroethenaTrichtoroethenacis-1 ,2-DichloroethenaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCsChlorobenzena1,1-DichloroethanaTOTAL VOCs/SEMIVOCs

«!Hi0jrJii!


ED23/1B

ED24/1BED24/1BED24/1BED24/1BED24/1BED24/1BED24/1BED24/1B .ED24/1BED24/1BED24/1BED24/13


ED24/REED24/REED24/REED24/REED24/REED24/RE

ED28/1BED28/1BED28/1BED28/1BED28/1BED23/1B

•- i • . .EU05/1BEU05/1B

RISMlitlgliii

0.941

5.93

V >.$28822227

- 243271

1303

635

3437

15023110303

3230.661322

0.60.61

0.9

J

J

J

J

JJ

.. .•J

L

J

J

J

• FORM: V » VOCs: S

fila:4TAB1B-1.wk1 GOLDER ASSaCME c Q page 8 of 9aCMJEg c q Q g

«5> - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileINITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HO ... TR2...

Documents

Transcript of «5> - US Environmental Protection Agency · PDF fileINITIAL HYDRAUUC HEAD (HO ... TR2...