4th Technical Meeting - WP6
-
Upload
slope-project -
Category
Education
-
view
311 -
download
0
Transcript of 4th Technical Meeting - WP6
Project SLOPE1
WP 6 – System integration
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Agenda
• WP6 Status • T.6.02
– Overview (integration, timeline, components)
• T.6.03– Overview– Modules interactions– Update by each partner– General questions and Issues– Action plan
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview - Goals
• Build a working system
• Ready for pilots and on-the-field testing
• 3 Main tasks:• First Integration - Forest Inventory & Harvesting
System • Second Integration - Forest Management• Third Integration – System Validation
• Technical and Economical Analysis • Overall solution costs• Social impacts• Environmental impacts
T.6.2
T.6.3
T.6.4
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview - ProccessWaterfall + agile like approach• 3 major loops of integration and lab validation• 4 minor loops of iterative evolution• Bug fixing and integration at high frequency• Parallel support for real use case pilots
T.6.2
T.6.3
T.6.4
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Components
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Components
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Timeline
• 4 agile-like integration sprints (bimonthly)• 2 sprint overlapping with step 2
• 1 monitoring meeting every 2 weeks• 1 Round of testing at the end of each sprint
• Incremental built of D.6.02.1 Report • Incremental build of D.6.04.1
→ 5 Completed
→ Done → Done→ Final review→ Done
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Integration
1. Connection of the 3D modelling for harvesting planning (T.2.4) with the FIS• [100%] Still some stuff to be finalized
2. Connection of handheld devices (e.g. TREE and MHG) with the FIS• [100%] MHG• [100%] Treemetrics
3. Connection of cable crane and processor head enhanced HW with the FIS• [100%] Cable crane connection with the Harvester Industrial PC• [50%] Industrial PC connection with the FIS
4. Connection of truck control units with the FIS• [100%] Ready
5. Connection of planning and editing functionalities already available in the 3Dmodelling for harvesting planning system with the FIS• [75%] Analytics tools depend strongly on data availability
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.03 Components
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.03 Timeline
• 4 agile-like integration sprints (bimonthly)• 2 sprint overlapping with step 3
• 1 Virtual meeting every 2 weeks• 1 Round of testing at the end of each sprint
• Incremental built of D.6.02.2 Report II• Incremental build of D.6.04.2
→ 2 Done
→ Done→ Done→ To be done→ To be done
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.03 - Integration
1. Refinement of already existing Web services to access the FIS• [75%] Work in progress
2. Development of new Web Services / Adapters to cope with onlinepurchasing/invoicing, real-time operation control and logistic optimization• [??%] System still under development
3. Connection of purchasing/invoicing system with the FIS• [??%] System still under development
4. Connection of real-time operation control system with the FIS
• [??%] Prototypes still under construction
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
T.6.3 Overview
• TBD
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
T.6.3 Overview
• Modules interaction
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
T.6.3 Partners update
• CNR• ITENE• MHG• Treemetrics• Greifenberg• BOKU
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
T.6.3 Questions and Issues
• ITENE• Should we need to know something in particular within the trucks tracking system?
• In the test data the speed field is always 0, is it correct?
• TREE• How often is it updated the SLOPE db from your system?
• MHG• We need a new logs table (identical to the original one) in which to store the new
information generated by CNR.
• It could be usefull to add a new field in the user_account to connect the user to hisreal estates.
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
T.6.3 Questions and Issues
• CNR• Plan to complete Industrial PC <-> FIS communication
• Greifenberg• We need to update the rope launcher formula based on your launch table.
• BOKU
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
T.6.3 Action Plan
• Ready by 15 Jul:• GT/ITENE: Test and visualization of truck movements
• Item 2
• Ready by 29 Jul:• CNR: Upload/Download data from Labview and the FIS
• Item 2
• Ready by 12 Aug:• Item 1
• Item 2
• Ready by 2 Sep:• Item 1
• Item 2
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
T.6.3 Action Plan
• Ready by 16 Sep:• Item 1
• Item 2
• Ready by 30 Sep:• Item 1
• Item 2
• Ready by 14 Oct:• Item 1
• Item 2
• Ready by 28 Oct:• Item 1
• Item 2
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Thanks
GRAPHITECH
[email protected]@graphitech.it
Fondazione GraphitechVia Alla Cascata 56C38123 Trento (ITALY)
Phone: +39 0461.283395Fax: +39 0461.283398
SLOPEIntegrated proceSsing and controL systems fOr sustainable forest Production in mountain arEas
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WORK PACKAGE 6: SYSTEM INTEGRATION
FONDAZIONE GRAPHITECH
THEME: Integrated processing and Control Systems forSustainable Production in Farms and ForestsDuration: 36 MonthsPartners: 10Coordinating institution: Fondazione GraphiTech
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Agenda
• Work Package Goals• Tasks and Roles Overview• Timeline• Deliverables• Task Details
• Task 6.02 Results• Task 6.03 Status
• Action plan• Open Discussion
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Work Package Key aspects
T.6.2
T.6.3
T.6.4
• Build a working system
• Ready for pilots and on-the-field testing
• 3 Main tasks:• First Integration - Forest Inventory & Harvesting
System • Second Integration - Forest Management• Third Integration – System Validation
• Technical and Economical Analysis • Overall solution costs• Social impacts• Environmental impacts
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Tasks and Roles
• T.6.1 Definition of integration Steps• Task leader: GRAPHITECH; Participants: MHG, FLY, ITENE
• T.6.2 First Integration - Forest inventory & harvesting systems• Task leader: GRAPHITECH; Participants: MHG, FLY, GRE, TRE, ITENE, COM, CNR
• T.6.3 Second integration – Forest management• Task leader: MHG; Participants: CNR, BOKU, GRE, TRE, ITENE
• T.6.4 – Third integration - System validation• Task leader: GRAPHITECH; Participants: COM, MHG, BOKU, FLY, GRE, TRE, ITENE
• T.6.5 – Scientific Coordination• Task leader: GRAPHITECH;
2014 2015 2016
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
WP 6 System Integration
T.6.1 Definition of the integration steps
T.6.2 First Integration – Forest inventory & harvesting systems
T.6.3 Second integration – Forest management
T.6.4 Third integration -System validation
T.6.5 Scientific coordination
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Timeline, Deliverables, Milestone, Project Meetings
D.6.01 System Integration and Validation Plan
D.6.021 System Integration Report ID.6.041 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report I
D.6.022 System Integration Report IID.6.042 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report II
D.6.023 System Integration Report IIID.6.043 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report III
MS04 SLOPE System Integration Planning is completed
MS05 Forest Inventory and Intelligent Harvesting system integration
MS07 Forest Management system integrated
MS09 System testing endingD.6.03 SLOPE System Field Trials Readiness Assessment Report
Technical MeetingsReview MeetingDeliverableMilestone
2014 2015 2016
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
WP 6 System Integration
T.6.1 Definition of the integration steps
T.6.2 First Integration – Forest inventory & harvesting systems
T.6.3 Second integration – Forest management
T.6.4 Third integration -System validation
T.6.5 Scientific coordination
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Timeline, Deliverables, Milestone, Project Meetings
D.6.01 System Integration and Validation Plan
D.6.021 System Integration Report I
D.6.022 System Integration Report IID.6.042 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report II
D.6.023 System Integration Report IIID.6.043 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report III
MS04 SLOPE System Integration Planning is completed
MS05 Forest Inventory and Intelligent Harvesting system integration
MS07 Forest Management system integrated
MS09 System testing endingD.6.03 SLOPE System Field Trials Readiness Assessment Report
Technical MeetingsReview MeetingDeliverableMilestone
D.6.041 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report I
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Deliverables
• D. 6.01 System Integration and Validation Plan (M16) – Submitted M18• Integration and validation procedures and timeline to validate the SLOPE system• Based on the use cases in WP1
• D.6.03 SLOPE System Field Trials Readiness Assessment Report (M36)• Assessment of the initial user experience and recommendations for the field trials
operations. • Guidance and system operation manual for the Field Trials operators
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Deliverables
• D. 6.021 System Integration Report I (M27) – Completed at M30• Integration test and validation concept procedures results • Assessment of the initial user experience• Recommendations for field trials operations
• D 6.022 System Integration Report II (M31) – Expected at M33• Integration test and validation concept procedures results (rev. 2)• Assessment of the initial user experience (rev. 2)• Recommendations for field trials operations (rev. 2)
• D 6.023 System Integration Report III (M34)• Integration test and validation concept procedures results (rev. 3)• Assessment of the initial user experience (rev. 3)• Recommendations for field trials operations (rev. 3)
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Deliverables
• D6.041 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report I (M27) Submitted M28 • Analysis of technical and economical aspects of SLOPE system • Current practices and the potential known alternatives comparison• Estimation phase
• D6.042 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report II (M31) Expected M32 • Analysis of technical and economical aspects of SLOPE system • Current practices and the potential known alternatives comparison• Preliminary results phase
• D6.043 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report III (M34): • Analysis of technical and economical aspects of SLOPE system • Current practices and the potential known alternatives comparison• Final results phase
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Deliverables Progress
100
90
20
0 0
100
0 00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
D.6.
01 S
yste
min
tegr
atio
n an
dva
lidat
ion
plan
D.6.
021
Syst
emin
tegr
atio
n re
port
1
D.6.
022
Syst
emin
tegr
atio
n re
port
2
D.6.
023
Syst
emin
tegr
atio
n re
port
3
D.6.
3 Sy
stem
fiel
dtr
ials
read
ines
sas
sess
men
t rep
ort
D.6.
041
Tech
no-
econ
omic
eval
uatio
n re
port
1
D.6.
042
Tech
no-
econ
omic
eval
uatio
n re
port
2
D.6.
043
Tech
no-
econ
omic
eval
uatio
n re
port
3
Deliverables Status
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Tasks Overview
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Task 6.1 – Definition of the integration steps
• Status: Completed (100%)• Length: 7 Months (From M10 to M16)• 5 Involved Partners
• Leader: GraphiTech• Participants: COMPOLAB, MHG, FLY, ITENE
• Aim: Achieve a complete integration of the different components that are part of the SLOPE platform to be tested on pilot areas
• Output: • D.6.01 System integration and validation plan
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Integration Strategy
Waterfall + agile like approach• 3 major loops of integration and lab validation• 4 minor loops of iterative evolution• Bug fixing and integration at high frequency• Parallel support for real use case pilots
T.6.2
T.6.3
T.6.4
For each main integration step:• Involved components• Timeline (integration steps,
milestones, telcos, days for testing)• One testing scenario• Involved actors • HW and SW requirements• Functional requirements
• defining a function• Non-functional requirements
• defining a criteria for an operation• Testing approach
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Task 6.2 – First integration: forest inventory and harvesting systems
• Status: Completed (100%)• Length: 14 Months (From M14 to M27)• 8 Involved Partners
• Leader: GraphiTech• Participants: COMPOLAB, MHG, FLY, GRE, TRE, ITENE, CNR
• Aim: • Integration of forest information system (FIS) with harvesting
measurement systems and software components
• Output: • D.6.21 System integration report I • D.6.41 SLOPE System Techno-Economic Evaluation Report I
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Task 6.2 - Effort• GraphiTech
• 3D Harvesting planner improvements (alpha 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7)• Banana Pro board software development for cable carriage• Integration coordination (Telcos, reports, etc.)
• MHG• FIS improvements, adaptations, extension (e.g. new tables for CNR)
• TREE• On the field App• Back-end development for on field app• Upload of tree marking operations on the FIS
• ITENE• Intelligent truck system finalization
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Task 6.2 - Effort• Greifenberg
• Tecno PLC Programming• Definition of CAN Bus protocol communications• Installation of Banana Pro Board
• CNR• Industrial PC programming for data acquisition on the harvester
• COMPOLAB• Industrial PC installation and configuration
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Alpha 1.0 – 1.4 Features
• Cable crane planning, profiling and animation• Rope launcher easer visualization of target coordinates and
cable length• Database Stands visualization • Trees visualization and spatial queries in Sover• Multilanguage support (Italian, German, English)• 3D moving objects along a path • Authentication• Workspace saving• Pilot test sites Map and Vector data• Legend for all datasets• Automatic PDF Report generation• Compass • GPS positioning
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Alpha 1.5 - Features• Stand selection• Tree metadata inspector• Tree status highlight and editing• Tree status update into database• User notifications• Harvesting plan update into database• Annaberg multi-resolution terrain • Points of interest (Gas stations)
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Alpha 1.6 - Features• Import, Export and Update of Tree and Logs dataset directly from the web• Building & Terminals data inspector• Integration of Biomass center for the Austrian area• Log visualization• Log metadata inspector with color highlight• Truck data visualization (ITENE test data)• Bug fixes and optimizations
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Alpha 1.7 - Features• HTTPS protocol for WP5 integration• Working Area setup with machines and notes• Spatial Queries with data analytics• Annaberg Opendata integration• Bug fixes and optimizations
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Video
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Alpha 1.8 Upcoming Features
• Truck data visualization in pilots area• Integration of algorithms to maximize the profit (BOKU)• Improvement of cable way planning (angles)• Possibility to save more than one workspace for each user• Storage areas monitoring• Support for the communication with the purchasing/invoicing
platform• Refinements base on users’ feedbacks
Technical Meeting 19-21 Jan 16
WP6 Partners effort
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Components
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Components
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Timeline
• 4 agile-like integration sprints (bimonthly)• 2 sprint overlapping with step 2
• 1 monitoring meeting every 2 weeks• 1 Round of testing at the end of each sprint
• Incremental built of D.6.02.1 Report • Incremental build of D.6.04.1
→ 4 Completed
→ Done → Done→ Final review→ Done
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.02 Integration
1. Connection of the 3D modelling for harvesting planning (T.2.4) with the FIS• [100%] Still some stuff to be finalized
2. Connection of handheld devices (e.g. TREE and MHG) with the FIS• [100%] MHG• [100%] Treemetrics
3. Connection of cable crane and processor head enhanced HW with the FIS• [100%] Cable crane connection with the Harvester Industrial PC• [50%] Industrial PC connection with the FIS
4. Connection of truck control units with the FIS• [100%] Ready
5. Connection of planning and editing functionalities already available in the 3Dmodelling for harvesting planning system with the FIS• [75%] Analytics tools depend strongly on data availability
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Task 6.02 – Functional Requirements
4 Operation4.1 Cableway planning HIGH4.1.1 Add/Remove pillars HIGH
4.1.2 Show harvesting area HIGH
4.1.3 Show cable information (angles, height from terrain, length)
HIGH
4.1.4 Show cable line profile MEDIUM
4.2 Working area setup4.2.1 Draw working area HIGH
4.2.2 Place harvesting machines HIGH
4.2.3 Place other resources HIGH
4.2.4 Plan routes MEDIUM
4.3 Track felling activities MEDIUM4.4 Toggle building and terminals visualization MEDIUM4.5 Track logistics MEDIUM4.5.1 Show truck movements MEDIUM
4.5.2 Track wood storage areas MEDIUM
4.5.3 Track sawmills MEDIUM
4.5.4 Show logs inventory MEDIUM
4.6 Track harvesting progress HIGH4.6.1 Real-time updates and statistics MEDIUM
4.7 Show weather conditions and forecast HIGH
• 101 Test Cases for T.6.02- Test Number- Interface (desktop, mobile, vehicle)- Preconditions- Test case description- Expected result- Obtained result- Anomaly- Performed- Passed
• 5 Validations done out of 5• 2 days of work for each validation• Test of each requirement in laboratory conditions• Threshold to be reached 70%
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Testing Results
34
4453 55
65
7
5
1111
560
52
37 3531
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Validation 1 Validation 2 Validation 3 Validation 4 Validation 5
Test
Cas
es
Validations
NotPerformed
Failed
Passed
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Task 6.02 – Non-Functional Requirements
Forest Information System (FIS)1 User friendliness HIGH2 Compatibility with all the desktop browsers HIGH3 Compatibility with mobile browsers MEDIUM4 Cross platform HIGH5 Dynamic interface MEDIUM
Mobile scenario
6Easy identification of virtually marked trees on the field HIGH
7 GPS signal should work in the forest MEDIUM8 Offline fault tolerance MEDIUM
In-vehicle scenario8 Offline fault tolerance MEDIUM
Usability questionnaires• Based on ISO 9241 recommendations covering
ergonomics of human-computer interaction• User details• Application test questionnaire: Overall system and
ergonomics, Testing scenario, Overall use of the interface, Expectations for implementation in final SLOPE Forest information system
• Isometric tests: Suitability for the task, Self-descriptiveness, Controllability, Conformity with user expectations, Error tolerance, Suitability for individualization, Suitability for learning
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Usability Questionnaire
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Preliminary results - Profiles
Professional Profile
Developer Researcher
Age Range
18 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44
Platform
Desktop Mobile In-vehicle
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
Aerial andsatellite image
analysis
Forest planningand simulation
software
Harvestingplanning
Tree marking Tree felling andextraction
Tree processing Logs pillingstocking and
transport
Wood auctionand selling
Experience
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Preliminary results - Application
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00 Overal system & Ergonomics
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Preliminary results - Application
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
Feedback timeis adequate(e.g. after I
select an optionthe consequent
action occurswith little or no
delay)
Processing timeis adequate
I haveexperienced no
time delayduring the
working session
There is someform of system
feedback forevery action
The interface isuser-friendly
The systemfeatures a
consistent icondesign scheme
and stylistictreatment
The colorschemas of the
interface areproperlychosen
The currentstatus of the
system isclearly
indicated at alltimes
The interface isconsistentduring thedifferentfunctions
Excessive detailin interface
design has beenavoided
The results aredisplayed
clearly andunderstandably
The resultsdisplayedcontain allimportant
information
The floatingmenu interface
is easy tounderstand
Scenario of the test
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Preliminary results - Application
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
It is easy to accessforest information
resources
It is easy tovisualise
information fromtrees and stems
The display of 3Dterrain helped meto understand the
specificcharacteristics of
on the stand
The display of 3Dcable line helpedme to improve its
positioning
It is easy toaggregate forest
production data ofa specific area
It is easy to accessterrain
measurementsand slope data
Menus are wellrepresentative of
the kind ofinformation they
can provide
Access to data
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Preliminary results - Application
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
I expect to beable to jump
betweenfunctionalities
more freely
I expect a 3Denviroment
reconstructionmore accurate
in terms ofaerial pictures
I expect a 3Denviroment
reconstructionmore accurate
in terms ofdigital
elevationmodel
I expect a 3Denviroment
reconstructionmore accurate
in terms offorest model
I expect a moreprecise control
of the cableline placement
I expect a moreprecise control
the workingarea setup
I expect a moreprecise tracking
of movingobjects
I expect to beable to setup
more than onecable line at
the same time
I expect to beable to do
more accurateanalysis on thewood product
I expect to havemore
informationabout the
produced wood
Expectations for implementation in final SLOPE Forest information system
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Preliminary results - Ergonomics
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
The softwareforces me to
perform tasksthat are not
related to myactual work
The softwarelets me
completelyperform entirework routines
The functionsimplemented in
the softwaresupport me inperforming my
work
I perceive thearrangement of
the elementson-screen as
sensible for thework I do withthe software
Too manydifferent steps
need to beperformed todeal with the
given task
The way inwhich data is
output is suitedto the tasks I
want to performwith thesoftware
The software iswell suited to
therequirements of
my work
In a given screenI find all the
information Ineed in that
situation
The conventionused in the
software reflectsthat of my
environment
The softwareprovides mewith a repeatfunction for
work steps thatmust be
performedseveral times in
succession
I can easilyadapt the
software forperforming new
tasks
The importantcommandsrequired toperform my
work are easy tofind
I am able toadjust the
presentation ofresults (on thescreen) to myvarious workrequirements
Thepresentation ofthe informationon the screen
supports me inperforming my
work
Suitability for the task
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Preliminary results - Ergonomics
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
I can call upspecific
explanationsfor the use ofthe system, if
necessary
I understandimmediately
what is meantby the
informationdisplayed bythe software
It is easy toretrieve
informationabout a certain
entry field
When menuitems are notavailable in
certainsituations, thisfact is visually
communicatedto me
If I want, thesoftware willdisplay not
only generalexplanation
but alsoconcrete
examples toillustrate
points
Theexplanations
that thesoftware gives
me clearlyrefer to the
specificsituations in
which they areoutput
If I want, thesoftware
displays basicinformation
aboutconceptual
aspects of theprogram
The softwareprovides mewith enoughinformationabout whichentries are
permitted in aparticularsituation
I can tellstraight away
whichfunctions are
invoked by thevarious menu
items
The conceptsused in the
software areclear and
unambiguous
The softwarealways visually
marks thecurrent entry
location
I can easily tellthe difference
amongfeedback
messages,requests to
confirm inputsor commands,warnings, and
errormessages.
Self descriptiveness
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Preliminary results - Ergonomics
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
I need a long time tolearn how to use
the software
It is easy for me torelearn how to usethe software after alengthy interruption
The explanationsprovided help meunderstand the
software so that Ibecome more and
more skilled at usingit
So far I have not hadany problems in
learning the rulesfor communicatingwith the software
I was able to use thesoftware right from
the beginning bymyself, without
having to askcoworkers for help
I feel encouraged bythe software to try
out new systemfunctions by trial
and error
In order to use thesoftware properly I
must remembermany details
I find it easy to usethe commands
Suitability for learning
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
T.6.02 Conclusions
• Good integration between mobile and desktop software with the forest information system (FIS)
• Test cases almost in line with the plan• Good usability feedbacks
• Machines communication needs to be improved• More users’ feedbacks needed on different platforms
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.03 Timeline
• 4 agile-like integration sprints (bimonthly)• 2 sprint overlapping with step 3
• 1 Virtual meeting every 2 weeks• 1 Round of testing at the end of each sprint
• Incremental built of D.6.02.2 Report II• Incremental build of D.6.04.2
→ 2 Done
→ Done→ Done→ To be done→ To be done
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
WP6 Overview – T.6.03 - Integration
1. Refinement of already existing Web services to access the FIS• [75%] Work in progress
2. Development of new Web Services / Adapters to cope with onlinepurchasing/invoicing, real-time operation control and logistic optimization• [90%] Almost ready
3. Connection of purchasing/invoicing system with the FIS• [90%] Almost ready
4. Connection of real-time operation control system with the FIS
• [25%] Prototype still under construction
34
4453 55
65
807
5
1111
5
0
6052
37 3531
21
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Validation 1 Validation 2 Validation 3 Validation 4 Validation 5 Validation 6
Test
Cas
es
Validations
NotPerformed
Failed
Passed
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Testing Results
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Conclusions and Remedial Actions
• T.6.02 Completed
• Delay with the integration of the forest management software
• Test cases to be extended
• Still a lot of integration work pending
• Action plan (bimonthly goals) for the upcoming months defined
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
T.6.3 Action Plan
• Ready by 15 Jul:• GT/ITENE: Test and visualization of truck movements
• GT/BOKU: New features for planning
• Ready by 29 Jul:• CNR: Upload/Download data from Labview and the FIS
• GT/BOKU: First implementation of T.5.04 Models
• Ready by 12 Aug:• MHG: Progress for the IPTIM/Woodland Manager integration
• Ready by 2 Sep:• MHG: Progress for the IPTIM/Woodland Manager integration
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Open Discussion
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Thank you for your attention
DANIELE MAGLIOCCHETTI
Fondazione GraphitechVia Alla Cascata 56C38123 Trento (ITALY)
Phone: +39 0461.283395Fax: +39 0461.283398
Project SLOPE
WP6 T6.3 – Second integration
Forest managementTrento, 5th July, 2016
Technical Meeting5 Jul 16
Overview
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
• Status: In progress (85%)• Length: 10 Months (From M22 to M31)• Involved Partners
• Leader: MHG• Participants: CNR, BOKU, GRE, TRE, ITENE
• Aim: Integrate the results of on-field data collection into the forest management system including the analysis resulting from WP4
• Output: D6.022 System Integration Report II
Objectives
• Specify integration points and adapters• Develop FIS Web Service module to handle all transactions
and connections• Connection of sales platform with the FIS• Connection of real-time operation control system with the
FIS• Develop adapters • Test integration points• Integrate user interfaces• Make report about the integration phase (System
Integration Report II)
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Timeline
M22 M23 M24 M25 M26 M27 M28 M29 M30 M31 M32 M33
Virtual meetings every 2 weeks
Report and taskready
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Specification Implementation & Testing
Deliverable overview
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Deliverable overview
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
User Interface(Entry point)
(Graphitech)3D Harvesting planner
SLOPE FISWeb Service(+Adapters)
GraphitechServices
MHG Services
TreemetricsServices
(MHG) Online salesplatform
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Data Integration
JSON Data
SLOPE FISWeb Service
SLOPE FIS Database
IntegrationAdapters
Treemetrics
MHG
• Specify integration points• Specify and implement adapters for data communication between different
services if needed• Extend SLOPE FIS Web Service when needed• Finnish Forest XML standard adapter implemented for MHG service integration
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
User Interface Integration
User Interface
SLOPE FIS Database
Web App 1
Web App 2
• Use light weight model to integrate web user interfaces to single entry point
• Implement SLOPE FIS integration app for user interface integration • Use SLOPE FIS database for user management• Iframe or link/tab integration
Auth
Web App 3
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
User Interface Integration
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
User Interface Integration
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
User Interface Integration
Summary
• Basic prototype of integrations implemented• Task is little bit late because we are waiting Iptim optimization tool
integration• One integration adapter implemented for export data from the slope
database to the online sales platform and Iptim optimization tool• Virtual meetings every two weeks• User interface fixes and more automation will be implemented• Report need to be completed• Goal is to finalize this task on September 2016
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Technical Meeting 5 Jul 16
Contact info
Veli-Matti Plosila [email protected]
Seppo Huurinainen [email protected]
Thank you for your attention