4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are...

17
Top 10 locations by publication Number of publications Top 10 locations for corporate- academic collaboration Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index) International collaboration and research impact What is FWCI? Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is above the normalised average International collaboration between income groups by location *Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally Upper Middle Income Lower Middle Income Low Income High Income High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations Collaborations with locations in... 1,000+ 600 to 999 400 to 599 200 to 399 100 to 199 Fewer than 100 Volume of publications supporting SDG1 Key themes in SDG1 Research 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0 20 60 40 80 100 FWCI International Collaboration (%) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Côte d'Ivoire Luxembourg Bosnia and Herzegovina Ireland Peru Switzerland Greece Egypt Laos Israel 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 3,000 2,500 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Ghana Kenya Ethiopia Bangladesh Nigeria South Africa Indonesia Colombia Pakistan Malaysia 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 United States China United Kingdom Germany Australia South Africa France Canada Italy India 4.5% Compound Annual Growth Rate in the period 1.2% Academic corporate collaboration 1.07 Field-Weighted Citation Impact 11,323 Publications in period 62.4% Publications from high-income locations 2.1% Publications from low-income locations 25.9% Publications with international collaboration 2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the research See the methodology and definitions RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus® Research supporting SDG1 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 4.5% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields. The US produces the most research supporting SDG1, followed by the United Kingdom, China, India and Australia. Seven of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 6,300 publications); two are upper-middle income locations (China and South Africa) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). Four low income locations featured in the top 50: Ethiopia (122 publications), Tanzania (82 publications), Uganda (70 publications) and Nepal (58 publications). The top five locations for which research on SDG1 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Ghana, Kenya, Ethiopia, Bangladesh and Nigeria. International collaboration yielded 26% of research on SDG1. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 7% of their total SDG1 research, while nearly 70% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations. As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG1 research was above average for four out of five years, with an average of 1.07 over the period. No poverty 1

Transcript of 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are...

Page 1: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

1,000+

600 to 999

400 to 599

200 to 399

100 to 199

Fewer than 100

Volume of publications supporting SDG1Key themes in SDG1 Research

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Côte

d'Ivo

ire

Luxem

bourg

Bosnia

and

Her

zego

vina

Irelan

dPer

u

Switzer

land

Greec

eEgy

ptLao

sIsr

ael

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

3,000

2,500

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Ghana

Kenya

Ethiop

ia

Bangla

desh

Nigeria

South

Afri

ca

Indones

ia

Colom

bia

Pakist

an

Malays

ia0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

United S

tates

China

United K

ingdom

Germ

any

Australi

a

South

Afri

ca

France

Canad

aIta

lyIndia

4.5%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

1.2%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.07Field-Weighted Citation Impact

11,323Publications

in period

62.4%Publications from

high-income locations

2.1%Publications from

low-income locations

25.9%Publications with

international collaboration

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Research supporting SDG1 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 4.5% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG1, followed by the United Kingdom, China, India and Australia. Seven of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 6,300 publications); two are upper-middle income locations (China and South Africa) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). Four low income locations featured in the top 50: Ethiopia (122 publications), Tanzania (82 publications), Uganda (70 publications) and Nepal (58 publications).

The top five locations for which research on SDG1 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Ghana, Kenya, Ethiopia, Bangladesh and Nigeria.

International collaboration yielded 26% of research on SDG1. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 7% of their total SDG1 research, while nearly 70% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG1 research was above average for four out of five years, with an average of 1.07 over the period.

No poverty1

Page 2: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

5,000+

3,000 to 4,999

1,000 to 2,999

500 to 999

100 to 499

Fewer than100

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

5,000

Switz

erlan

d

Madag

asca

r

Côte d'

Ivoire

Austria

Denm

ark

Costa

Rica

Irelan

dCuba

Sweden

Venez

uela0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0

5

10

15

20

25

Niger

Mali

Zimba

bwe

Kenya

Burkina F

aso

Benin

Malawi

Ethiop

ia

Zambia

Tanza

nia0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

12,000

United S

tates

China

United K

ingdom

Germ

any

Brazil

Australi

a

France

Canad

aIta

lyIndia

Volume of publications supporting SDG2Key themes in SDG2 Research

9.6%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

1.3%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.14Field-Weighted Citation Impact

93,390Publications

in period

55.1%Publications from

high-income locations

2.0%Publications from

low-income locations

11.2%Publications with

international collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Research supporting SDG2 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 9.6% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG2, followed by the China, India, UK and Brazil. Seven of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 26,000 publications); two are upper-middle income locations (China and Brazil) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). Two low income locations featured in the top 50: Ethiopia (1,065 publications) and Tanzania (501 publications).

The top five locations for which research on SDG2 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Niger, Mali, Zimbabwe, Kenya, and Burkina Faso.

International collaboration yielded 11% of research on SDG2. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 7% of their total SDG2 research, while 60% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG2 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.14 over the period.

Zero hunger2

Page 3: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG3Key themes in SDG3 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

300,000+

100,000 to 299,999

30,000 to 99,999

10,000 to 29,999

2,000 to 9,999

Fewer than 2,000

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)Qata

r

Icelan

d

Switzer

land

Finland

Denm

ark

Belgium

Hungary

Luxem

bourg

Austria

Estonia

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

0

800,000

700,000

600,000

500,000

400,000

300,000

200,000

100,000

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

3

2.5

Uganda

Ethiop

ia

Kenya

Ghana

Leban

on

Nether

lands

Denm

ark

Peru

United S

tates

Sweden

0

1,200,000

1,000,000

800,000

600,000

400,000

200,000

United S

tates

China

Germ

any

Japa

nIta

ly

Canad

a

France

Australi

aIndia

United K

ingdom

0.9%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

2.5%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.16Field-Weighted Citation Impact

3,349,291Publications

in period

74.6%Publications from

high-income locations

0.4%of Publications from low-income locations

20.9%Publications with

international collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Research supporting SDG3 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 0.9% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG3, followed by China, the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Eight of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 2.2 million publications); one is an upper-middle income locations (China) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG3 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Uganda, Ethiopia, Kenya, Ghana and Lebanon.

International collaboration yielded 21% of research on SDG3. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 2% of their total SDG3 research, while 66% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG3 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.16 over the period.

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Good health & well-being

3

Page 4: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG4Key themes in SDG4 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

2,000+

1,000 to 1,999

500 to 999

200 to 499

100 to 199

Fewer than 100

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)Ken

ya

Costa

Rica

Urugu

ay

Switzer

land

France

Botswan

a

Tanza

nia

Vietn

amEgy

ptFiji0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Kazak

hstan

South

Afri

ca

New Zea

land

Australi

a

Nigeria

Hong K

ong

ChileBra

zil

Finland

Norway

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

United S

tates

United K

ingdom

Brazil

Spain

Russian

Feder

ation China

South

Afri

ca

Canad

a

Germ

any

Australi

a

7.6%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

0.5%Academic corporate

collaboration

0.96Field-Weighted Citation Impact

25,550Publications

in period

70.9%Publications from

high-income locations

0.5%Publications from

low-income locations

15.6%Publications with

international collaboration

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Research supporting SDG4 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 7.6% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG4, followed by the United Kingdom, Australia, Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle income locations (Brazil, Russian Federation, China and South Africa). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG4 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Kazakhstan, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia and Nigeria.

International collaboration yielded 16% of research on SDG4. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 3% of their total SDG4 research, while 73% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG4 research was below average for four out of five years, with an average of 0.96 over the period.

Quality Education4

Page 5: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG5Key themes in SDG5 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

4,000+

1,000 to 3,999

500 to 999

200 to 499

100 to 199

Fewer than 100

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)Qata

r

Zambia

Camer

oon

Palesti

ne

Mozam

bique

Kyrgyz

stan

Ukrain

e

Côte d'

Ivoire Ira

q

Botswan

a0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

United S

tates

United K

ingdom

Canad

aIndia

Spain

Germ

any

Brazil

South

Afri

ca

Sweden

Australi

a0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Uganda

Kenya

Tanza

niaNep

al

Ghana

Ethiop

ia

South

Afri

ca

Bangla

desh

Nigeria

United K

ingdom 20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9 ,000

7.4%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

0.7%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.19Field-Weighted Citation Impact

35,625Publications

in period

78.5%Publications from

high-income locations

1.4%Publications from

low-income locations

17.3%Publications with

international collaboration

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Research supporting SDG5 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 7.4% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG5, followed by the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and Spain. Seven of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 25,000 publications); two are upper-middle income locations (South Africa and Brazil) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). Three low income locations featured in the top 50: Ethiopia (188 publications), Uganda (185 publications) and Tanzania (133 publications).

The top five locations for which research on SDG5 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Nepal and Ghana.

International collaboration yielded 17% of research on SDG5. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 7% of their total SDG5 research, while nearly 72% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG5 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.19 over the period.

Gender Equality5

Page 6: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG6Key themes in SDG6 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

2,000 to 8,999

1,000 to 1,999

500 to 999

100 to 499

Fewer than 100

9,000+

Top 10 countries by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

China

United S

tates

United K

ingdom

Germ

any

Australi

aSpa

inBra

zil

Canad

aIta

lyIndia

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

China

United S

tates

United K

ingdom

Germ

any

Australi

aSpa

inBra

zil

Canad

aIta

lyIndia

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Tanza

nia

Ethiop

iaNep

al

Kenya

Sri Lan

ka

Bangla

desh

Ghana

Philippin

es

South

Afri

ca

Jord

an20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

8.1%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

2.2%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.31Field-Weighted Citation Impact

46,074Publications

in period

58.8%Publications from

high-income locations

0.7%Publications from

low-income locations

28.6%Publications with

international collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Clean water and sanitation

6

Research supporting SDG6 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 8.1% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

China produces the most research supporting SDG6, followed by the US, India, the United Kingdom and Australia. Seven of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 22,700 publications); two are upper-middle income locations (China and Brazil) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG6 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Tanzania, Ethiopia, Nepal, Kenya and Sri Lanka.

International collaboration yielded 29% of research on SDG6. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 3% of their total SDG6 research, while nearly 63% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG6 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.31 over the period.

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Page 7: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG7Key themes in SDG7 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

50,000+

10,000 to 49,999

5,000 to 9,999

1,000 to 4,999

100 to 999

Fewer than 100

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Norway

Austria

Finland

Nether

lands

Irelan

d

Switzer

land

Luxem

bourg

Sweden

Germ

any

Brunei

Daruss

alam

0

5

10

15

20

25

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

China

United S

tates

Germ

any

Italy

United K

ingdom

South

Kor

ea

France

Japa

nSpa

inIndia

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Moroc

co

Algeria

Latvia

Qatar

Maurit

ius

Brunei

Daruss

alam

United A

rab

Emira

tes

Palesti

ne

Bangla

desh

Libyan

Ara

b

Jam

ahiri

ya 2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

0

80,000

90,000

70,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

10,000

100,000

9.1%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

3.9%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.49Field-Weighted Citation Impact

383,354Publications

in period

57.2%Publications from

high-income locations

0.1%Publications from

low-income locations

22.6%Publications with

international collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Affordable and clean energy

7

Research supporting SDG7 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 9.1% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

China produces the most research supporting SDG7, followed by the US, India, Germany and the United Kingdom. Eight of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 167,700 publications); one is an upper-middle income location (China) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG7 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Morocco, Algeria, Latvia, Qatar and Mauritius.

International collaboration yielded 23% of research on SDG7. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on less than 1% of their total SDG7 research, while 51% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG7 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.49 over the period.

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Page 8: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG8Key themes in SDG8 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

10,000+

4,000 to 9,999

2,000 to 3,999

500 to 1,999

100 to 499

Fewer than 100

0

2,000

6,000

4,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

United S

tates

China

Russian

Feder

ation India

Germ

any

Italy

Malays

ia

Australi

aSpa

in

United K

ingdom

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Ghana

Zimba

bwe

Nigeria

Kazak

hstan

South

Afri

caLatv

ia

Indones

ia

Lithuan

ia

Ecuad

or

Malays

ia20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

20,000

5,000

10,000

15,000

25,000

Côte d'I

voire

Finland

Icelan

d

Luxem

bourg

Austria

Denm

ark

Germ

any

Bosnia

and

Herze

govin

aKuwait

Switzer

land

0

5

10

15

20

25

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

9.2%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

1.1%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.14Field-Weighted Citation Impact

89,498Publications

in period

61.0%Publications from

high-income locations

0.3%Publications from

low-income locations

20.8%Publications with

international collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Decent work and economic growth

8

Research supporting SDG8 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 9.2% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG7, followed by China, the United Kingdom, Russia and Germany. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 37,000 publications); three are upper-middle income locations (China, Russia and Malaysia) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG8 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Ghana, Zimbabwe, Nigeria, Kazakhstan and South Africa.

International collaboration yielded 21% of research on SDG8. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 2% of their total SDG8 research, while nearly 58% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG8 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.14 over the period.

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Page 9: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG9Key themes in SDG9 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

5,000+

2,500 to 4,999

1,000 to 2,499

500 to 999

100 to 499

Fewer than 100

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Luxem

bourg

Finland

Norway

Irelan

d

Sweden

Germ

any

France

Belgium

Maced

onia

Botswan

a0

4

6

2

8

10

14

16

12

18

0

1,000

3,000

2,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

China

United S

tates

India

Germ

any

Italy

Spain

Australi

a

Indones

ia

Malays

ia

United K

ingdom

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4.5

4

5

Indones

ia

Malays

ia

Philippin

es

Kazak

hstan

Nigeria

South

Afri

ca

Bangla

desh

United A

rab

Emira

tes

Colom

bia

Moroc

co20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

8,000

2,000

1,000

4,000

6,000

10,000

7,000

3,000

5,000

9,000

9.1%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

2.4%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.2Field-Weighted Citation Impact

39,114Publications

in period

59.6%Publications from

high-income locations

0.2%Publications from

low-income locations

21.7%Publications with

international collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Industry, innovation and infrastructure

9

Research supporting SDG9 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 9.1% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

China produces the most research supporting SDG9, followed by the US, the United Kingdom, India and Italy. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 15,000 publications); two are upper-middle income locations (China and Malaysia) and two are lower-middle income locations (India and Indonesia). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG9 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Kazakhstan and Nigeria.

International collaboration yielded 22% of research on SDG9. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 1% of their total SDG9 research, while nearly 52% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG9 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.2 over the period.

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Page 10: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG10Key themes in SDG10 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

5,000+

1,500 to 4,999

1,000 to 1,499

500 to 999

100 to 499

Fewer than 100

0

4,000

2,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

United S

tates

United K

ingdom

China

Australi

a

Canad

aSpa

inIndiaIta

ly

France

Germ

any

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4.5

4

5

Ghana

Luxem

bourg

South

Afri

ca

Lithuan

ia

Kenya

Norway

United K

ingdom

Nigeria

Ecuad

or

Bangla

desh

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

0

8,000

2,000

4,000

6,000

12,000

10,000

Côte d'

Ivoire

Burkina F

aso

Luxem

bourg

Peru

Costa

Rica

Cypru

s

Namibi

a

Cambo

dia

Maced

onia

Malawi

0

5

10

15

25

20

30

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.2%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

0.8%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.14Field-Weighted Citation Impact

47,227Publications

in period

77.8%Publications from

high-income locations

0.3%Publications from

low-income locations

20.0%Publications with

international collaboration

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Research supporting SDG10 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 4.2% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG10, followed by the United Kingdom, Germany, China and Canada. Eight of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 31,700 publications); one is an upper-middle income location (China) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG10 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Ghana, Luxembourg, South Africa, Lithuania and Kenya.

International collaboration yielded 20% of research on SDG10. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 2% of their total SDG10 research, while nearly 65% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG10 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.14 over the period.

Reduced Inequalities10

Page 11: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG11Key themes in SDG11 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

20,000+

10,000 to 19,999

5,000 to 9,999

1,000 to 4,999

500 to 999

Fewer than 500

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Irelan

d

Finland

Norway

Germ

any

Seneg

al

Denm

ark

Luxem

bourg

Costa

Rica

Sweden

Icelan

d0

1

2

3

5

6

7

8

9

4

10

0

10,000

5,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

China

United S

tates

India

Australi

aIta

lySpa

inBra

zil

Germ

any

Canad

a

United K

ingdom

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Ghana

Sri Lan

ka

Philippin

es

Ecuad

or

Nepal

Indones

ia

Bangla

desh

Kenya

Moroc

coLatv

ia20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

20,000

5,000

10,000

15,000

40,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

13.1%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

1.8%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.22Field-Weighted Citation Impact

141,331Publications

in period

60.4%Publications from

high-income locations

0.3%Publications from

low-income locations

22.6%Publications with

international collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Sustainable Cities and Communities2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Research supporting SDG11 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 13.1% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

China produces the most research supporting SDG11, followed by the US, United Kingdom, India and Italy. Seven of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 62,500 publications); two are upper-middle income locations (China and Brazil) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG11 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Ghana, Sri Lanka, Philippines, Ecuador and Nepal.

International collaboration yielded 23% of research on SDG11. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 1% of their total SDG11 research, while 65% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG11 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.22 over the period.

11

Page 12: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG12Key themes in SDG12 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

10,000+

3,000 to 9,999

1,000 to 2,999

500 to 999

100 to 499

Fewer than 100

0

4,000

2,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

18,000

16,000

14,000

China

United S

tates

India

Germ

any

Italy

Spain

Brazil

Australi

a

Canad

a

United K

ingdom

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Ghana

Nigeria

Sri Lan

kaLatv

ia

Malays

ia

Lithuan

ia

Indones

ia

Ecuad

or

Bangla

desh

Philippin

es20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

15,000

10,000

5,000

25,000

20,000

Norway

Costa

Rica

Austria

Sweden

Switzer

land

Cuba

Nether

lands

Venez

uela

Icelan

d

Finland

0

2

6

8

4

12

10

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

11.6%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

2.0%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.36Field-Weighted Citation Impact

84,127Publications

in period

61.7%Publications from

high-income locations

0.2%Publications from

low-income locations

24.2%Publications with

international collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Research supporting SDG12 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 11.6% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

China produces the most research supporting SDG12, followed by the US, United Kingdom, India and Italy. Seven of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 37,400 publications); two are upper-middle income locations (China and Brazil) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG12 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Ghana, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, Latvia and Malaysia.

International collaboration yielded 24% of research on SDG12. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 1% of their total SDG12 research, while nearly 58% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG12 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.36 over the period.

Responsible consumption and production

12

Page 13: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

180,102Publications

in period

73.5%Publications from

high-income locations

0.4%Publications from

low-income locations

34.5%Publications with

international collaboration

6.3%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

2.1%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.37Field-Weighted Citation Impact

Key themes in SDG13 ResearchTop 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

Volume of publications supporting SDG13

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration by income bracket

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

International collaboration and research impact

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

20,000+

10,000 to 19,999

5,000 to 9,999

1,000 to 4,999

500 to 999

Fewer than 500

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

United S

tates

China

United K

ingdom

Germ

any

Australi

a

Canad

a

France

Spain

Italy

India0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Green

land

New C

aledo

nia Fiji

Panam

a

Bolivia Mali

Nepal

Benin

Kenya

Madag

asca

r20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Madag

asca

r

Venez

uela Peru

Norway

Irelan

d

Bolivia

Costa

RicaQata

r

Denm

ark

Finland

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

20 40 60 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Climate action

Research supporting SDG13 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 6.3% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG13, followed by China the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. Eight of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 139,000 publications); one is an upper-middle income location (China) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG13 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Greenland, New Caledonia, Fiji, Panama and Bolivia.

International collaboration yielded 34.5% of research on SDG13. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 2% of their total SDG13 research, while nearly 56% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG13 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.37 over the period.

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

13

Page 14: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG14Key themes in SDG14 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

10,000+

5,000 to 9,999

1,000 to 4,999

500 to 999

100 to 499

Fewer than 100

Seych

elles

Baham

as

Norway

Sweden

Libyan

Ara

b

Jam

ahiri

ya

Berm

uda

Seneg

al

Switzer

land

Venez

uelaQata

r0

5

15

20

10

25

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

30,000

25,000

United S

tates

China

Australi

a

France

Germ

any

Canad

aIndiaIta

lySpa

in

United K

ingdom

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

New

Caledo

niaNor

way

Icelan

d

Philippin

es

New Zea

land

Estonia

Portu

gal

Croati

aChile

Australi

a20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

15,000

10,000

5,000

25,000

20,000

5.1%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

3.5%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.1Field-Weighted Citation Impact

104,532Publications

in period

71.3%Publications from

high-income locations

0.04%Publications from

low-income locations

31.7%Publications with

international collaboration

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Research supporting SDG14 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 5.1% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG14, followed by China the United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Eight of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 71,600 publications); one is an upper-middle income location (China) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). No low income locations featured in the top 50.

The top five locations for which research on SDG14 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are New Caledonia, Norway, Iceland, Philippines and New Zealand.

International collaboration yielded 32% of research on SDG14. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 1% of their total SDG14 research, while nearly 53% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG14 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.1 over the period.

Life below water14

Page 15: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG15Key themes in SDG15 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

20,000+

5,000 to 19,999

2,000 to 4,999

500 to 1,999

100 to 499

Fewer than 100

Venez

uela

Madag

asca

rLao

sCuba

Mongo

lia

Denm

ark

Norway

Switzer

land

Icelan

d

Irelan

d0

2

6

8

10

4

12

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

30,000

25,000

United S

tates

China

Germ

any

Canad

a

Australi

a

France

IndiaBra

zil

Spain

United K

ingdom

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Laos

Panam

a

Mongo

lia

Ethiop

ia

Costa

Rica

Burkina F

aso

Kenya

Zimba

bwe

Nepal

Tanza

nia20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

15,000

10,000

5,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

6.7%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

1.5%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.29Field-Weighted Citation Impact

111,202Publications

in period

66.1%Publications from

high-income locations

0.7%Publications from

low-income locations

32.5%Publications with

international collaboration

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Research supporting SDG15 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 6.7% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG15, followed by China, the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. Seven of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 69,300 publications); two are upper-middle income locations (China and Brazil) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). One low income location featured in the top 50: Ethiopia (780 publications).

The top five locations for which research on SDG15 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Laos, Panama, Mongolia, Ethiopia and Costa Rica.

International collaboration yielded 33% of research on SDG15. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 3% of their total SDG15 research, while nearly 62% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG15 research was above average every year, with an average of 1.29 over the period.

Life on land15

Page 16: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

Top 10 locations for corporate-academic collaboration

Top 10 locations by RAI *(Relative Activity Index)

International collaboration and research impact

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

International collaboration between income groups by location

*Relative Activity Index is a measure of the proportion of the country’s research output in the subject, relative to the proportion seen globally

Volume of publications supporting SDG16Key themes in SDG16 Research

Upper Middle Income

Lower Middle Income

Low Income

High Income

High Income Locations Upper Middle Income Locations

Lower Middle Income Locations Low Income Locations

Collaborationswith locations in...

20,000+

5,000 to 19,999

2,000 to 4,999

500 to 1,999

100 to 499

Fewer than 100

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

60,000

50,000

United S

tates

United K

ingdom

Canad

aIndia

Germ

any

China

Nether

landsIta

lySpa

in

Australi

a0

0.5

1

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.5

4.0

Rwanda

Uganda

Palesti

ne

Zimba

bwe

South

Afri

ca

Leban

onKen

ya

Nigeria

Ghana

United K

ingdom 20

1520

1620

1720

1820

190

15,000

10,000

5,000

40,000

35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

United

State

s

United K

ingdom

Canad

aIndia

Germ

any

China

Nether

landsIta

lySpa

in

Australi

a0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

2.7%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

0.9%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.04Field-Weighted Citation Impact

169,330Publications

in period

78.3%Publications from

high-income locations

0.4%Publications from

low-income locations

13.5%Publications with

international collaboration

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Peace, justice and strong institutions

16

Research supporting SDG16 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 2.7% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields.

The US produces the most research supporting SDG16, followed by China, the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. Eight of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 111,300 publications); one is an upper-middle income location (China) and one is a lower-middle income location (India). Six low income locations feature in the top 50: Uganda (284 publications), Ethiopia (194 publications), Tanzania (163 publications), Nepal (128 publications), Rwanda (103 publications) and Malawi (58 publications).

The top five locations for which research on SDG16 represents the largest share of their research portfolio are Rwanda, Uganda, Palestine, Zimbabwe and South Africa.

International collaboration yielded 14% of research on SDG16. High income locations collaborated with low income locations on 37% of their total SDG16 research, while nearly 73% of the related output from low income locations came from collaboration with high income locations.

As a measure of academic impact measured by citation, the field weighted citation impact (FWCI) for SDG16 research was above average every year, with an averageof 1.04 over the period.

2015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Page 17: 4.5% 1.2% 1.07 25.9%Brazil and the Russian Federation. Six of the 10 most prolific locations are high income locations (accounting for more than 13,400 publications) and four are upper-middle

229Publications

in period

71.4%Publications from

high-income locations

3.0%Publications from

low-income locations

34.2%Publications with

international collaboration

More than 60

20 to 60

10 to 20

6 to 10

3 to 5

Less than 3

11.9%Compound Annual

Growth Rate in the period

1.3%Academic corporate

collaboration

1.86Field-Weighted Citation Impact

Top 10 locations by publication

Number of publications

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

United S

tates

United K

ingdom Ita

ly

Canad

a

Germ

any

China

Switzer

land

India

South

Afri

ca

Australi

a

Volume of publications supporting SDG17

International collaboration and research impact

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

0

15,000

10,000

5,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

00 20 6040 80 100

FWC

I

International Collaboration (%)

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

What is FWCI?

Field-weighted citation impact is an indicator of scholarly impact based on the number of times the publication was cited in other research. An FWCI of above 1.0 indicates the impact is

above the normalised average

Research supporting SDG17 has grown since 2015, with a compound annual growth rate of 11.9% compared to nearly 3.5% for research in all fields

Yet the data shows that more research is needed on SDG17. Research output, at 229 total publications, was the lowest among all the SDGs, and nearly 100% lower than SDG3 which had the highest output with more than three million total publications.

In order to advance the SDGs, partnerships are vital. They can help scale ambition and complement the strengths of respective partners, providing new perspectives on challenges. Prospective partners may have specialist sector knowledge, on the ground expertise, and/or provide access to key stakeholders which one partner does not have. Transparency is critical and partners should be clear about expectations and engage frequently.

A key RELX partner on the SDGs is the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) which brings UNGC signatories together with civil society partners to plan projects and develop tools and guidance that can help all companies increase their SDG performance. We support the UNGC SDG8 Action Platform – Decent Work and Economic Growth – which helps business address important SDG8 targets such as 8.7, “Take immediate and effective measures to eradicate forced labour, end modern slavery and human trafficking and secure the prohibition and elimination of the worst forms of child labour.”

The UNGC is a partner, along with Global Citizen, the Ban Ki-Moon Centre for Global Citizens, and the Responsible Media Forum on RELX

SDG Inspiration Days, which convene business, government, investors, academia, youth and NGOs

– stakeholders needed to accelerate the SDGs – to explore positive, collaborative action.

Partnerships for the SDGs are also central to Elsevier’s mission to support inclusion and diversity, research capacity building, climate action and global health. One of the most compelling examples of how Elsevier contributes content, data, analytics, expertise and funding to build strong partnerships is Research4Life. For nearly 20 years, Elsevier has collaborated with UN agencies, publishers, key universities and non-profits to bridge the digital research divide for developing country researchers and healthcare workers. It provides a quarter of Research4Life content benefitting more than 10,000 registered institutions in over 125 countries.

This analysis builds on Elsevier’s Sustainability Science in a Global Landscape report, which was released in 2015 to coincide with the launch of the SDGs. See a 2017 update on key findings on the RELX SDG Resource Centre. Help us to provide insight into SDG research. Click here to review the researchSee the methodology and definitions

RELX and the RE symbol are trademarks of RELX Group plc, used under license. Elsevier is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. © 2020 RELX Sources: Scopus®

Partnership for the goal172015-2019 Output, Impact, Collaboration

Key themes in SDG17 Research