42A07NW01ie 3 .4598 SHERATON 010

RECEIVEDMAR'51982

MINING LANDS SECTION

REPORT ON GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS RADISSON CREEK GROUP OF CLAIMS SHERATON AND THOMAS TOWNSHIPS

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION PROVINCE OF ONTARIO

F. J. Evelegh

Exploration Dept. January 12lb, 1982 Johns-ManviIle Canada Inc. Asbe s to s, Quebec

Table42A07NWeiie 2.4598 SHERATON

Introduction

Property

Location and Accessibility

Topography

Previous Work

General Geology

Line Gutting and Chaining

Electromagnetic Survey

Magnetometer Survey

Conclusions and Recommendations

010CJTttgt! l

1

2

2

2. 3

3. 4

4. 5

5. 6

6. 7

7. 8

List of .Maps Accompanying this Report

Topographic Plan - Scale: 1" B 200'

Electromagnetic Profile Plan - Scale: 1" - 200'

Magnetometer Profile Plan -Scale: 1" - 200'

Legend Sheet

REPORT ON GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS RADISSON CREEK GROUP OP CLAIMS SHERATON AND THOMAS TOWNSHIPS PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION PROVINCE OP ONTARIO.

Introduction:

The following report describes the geophysical surveys complet

ed during December, 1981 on seven mining claims recorded in the name

of Johns-Manville Canada Inc. and located in Sheraton and Thomas Town

ships, Porcupine Mining Division.

Cutting and chaining of picket lines were carried out by Company

employees working from the Matheson office.

Electromagnetic surveying was conducted by J. Goodger, Senior

Geologist, assisted by K. Gray. A McPhar R.E.M. vertical loop unit

was used for this work.

Magnetometer surveying was carried out by K. Gray, Fieldman and

geophysical operator with the Company, and J. Goodger. Two Fluxgate

Model MF-1 units were used for the survey.

Draughting, interpretation and compilation of the report were

completed by personnel from both the Matheson and Asbestos offices.

Supervision of the field work was handled by R. Kaltwasser,

Senior Pieldman. Interpretation of the data and compilation of the

report were the responsibility of the writer, Exploration Manager with

Johns-Manville Canada Inc. based at Asbestos, Quebec.

Property:

The claims surveyed are contiguous,with one in Thomas and the

remainder situated in Sheraton Township. Acreage totals approximately

280.

l ( Staking was carried out on January 19^, 20U) and 21st and the

claims were recorded on January 29^, 1981. All claims have been trans

ferred to Johns-Manville Canada Inc.

Location and Accessibility:

^^ The Radisson Creek claims straddle the Sheraton-Thomas Townships

boundary and adjoin the property of Armont Gold Mines Ltd. to the south.

Access is provided by a gravel road (Gibson Lake) which branches

off to the south from Highway No. 101 approximately eighteen miles

west of Matheson (towards Timmins). The Gibson Lake road crosses the

northeast corner of the property at a distance of approximately twelve

miles from the highway. A branch road leads to the southeastern section

of the claims group.

Topography:

Radisson Creek, which has a width of approximately 20 feet,

meanders in a northerly direction through the central part of the

property. The jackpine-covered sand ridges along the creek have relativ

ely steep embankments - up to 35 feet in height. Several narrow ravines,

trending in an east-west direction, cut the sand ridges and have

spring-fed streams which empty into Radisson Creek.

The southern section of the claims is low and covered by an

alder-balsam swamp. To the west of Radisson Creek the area has been

timbered leaving second growth willow, alder and balsam. Reforestation

has been started along the western boundary of the property.

Previous Work:

In 1911, the Ontario Bureau of Mines published a report with

accompanying maps, compiled by A.G. Burrows and entitled "The Porcupine

Gold Area". This was the Twentieth Annual Report, Part II.

The Twenty-third Annual Report, Part III, of the Ontario Depart

ment of Mines was published in 1924 and contained a section and map

covering "The Night Hawk Lake Gold Area" as compiled by P.E. Hopkins.

In 1942 the Ontario Department of Mines published a report and

map, compiled by L.G. Berry entitled "Geology of the Langmuir-Sheraton

- 2 -

2f Area". This was the Forty-ninth Annual Report, Part IV.

l/ ^ More recently, 1971* Geological Report 96 entitled "Geology

of the Night Hawk Lake Area, District of Cochrane", as compiled by

E.J. Leahy was published by the O.D.M. Map No. 2222 accompanies this

report.

Map No. 2205 - The Timmins-Kirkland Lake Sheet of the Geological

Compilation Series on a scale of one inch equals four miles covers the

property.

Sheraton Township is also shown on Ontario Geological Survey

Preliminary Map P.2074- of the Timmins Data Series, issued in 1980.

Aeromagnetic Maps on scales of one inch equals four miles and

one-half mile have been published jointly by the O.D.M. - G.S.C.

All of the previously-listed reports and maps are on file in the

Company library and have been used extensively during our exploration

work in the Night Hawk Lake Area.

No data on the Blanchette claims was on file at the Resident

Geologist's office at the Ministry of Natural Resources in Timmins.

General Geology;

The following "Table of Formations" has been taken from Page 7

of the Report on the Geology of the Night Hawk Lake Area compiled by

E.J. Leahy:

Table of FormationsCenozoic:

Recent : Lake, stream, and swamp deposits Pleistocene: Till, sand and gravel, varved clay

Unconformity

PRECAMBRIAN:

Proterozoic:

Younger Mafic Intrusive Rocks (Keweenawan?)Diabase

Intrusive Contact

Mafic Intrusive Rocks (Matachewan?) ,Diabase, porphyritic diabase

P: -3- ' ' .' V-." . ' '. '

Intrusive Contact

Archean:

Extremely Altered RocksChlorite-carbonate schist, talc-chlorite-carbonate schist, chlorite-sericite-quartz schist, serpentine schist, carbonate rock.

Gradational and Fault Contacts

Felsic Intrusive RocksBiotite granite, quartz-feldspar porphyry, feldspar porphyry, syenitic, aplitic, and felsitic dikes.

Intrusive Contact

Younger Sedimentary RocksGreywacke, conglomerate, argillite, slate

Unconformable Contact

Mafic and Ultramafic Intrusive RocksSerpentinized peridotite and dunite, diorite, carbonatized ultramafic rocks

Intrusive Contact

Metasediments and Tuffaceous MetasedimentsGraphitic metasediments, argillite, slate, greywacke, conglomerate, tuffaceous rocks.

Facies Change and Interfingering Contact

Intermediate to Felsic MetavolcanicsRhyolite, rhyodacitic rocks, agglomerate, tuff, iron formation

Conformable and Interfingering Contact

Mafic to Intermediate MetavolcanicsMassive and pillowed lava flows, spherulitic and amygdaloidal lavas, porphyritic lavas, volcanic breccia, tuffs and agglomerate, iron formation.

As part of the 1981 exploration program on the Radisson Creek

claims, reconnaissance-type mapping of the topography was carried out

by J. Goodger. The results of this work are shown on the accompanying

Topographic Plan on a scale of 1" s 200'. Unfortunately, no bedrock

exposures were discovered on the property.

Line Guttins and Chaining;

The base line was started from the No. 2 post of claim P-598858

on the Thomae-Sheraton Townships boundary and cut to the west for a

length of 1,200' and to the east 5*960 feet. Right-angled offset lines,

ced at 400' intervals, were cut and chained to the north and south

of this base line, as required to cover the claims. Marked pickets were

established every 100' along the base and offset lines by chainage.

Total miles of base (0.98) and picket lines (6.25) cut and

chained on the Radisson Creek claims was 7*2.

Electromagnetic Survey;

Electromagnetic surveying was conducted on the property by

J. Goodger, assisted by K. Gray. Both men are employed by Johns-Manville

Canada Inc. and are based at Matheson.

Field work was carried out during the mid-part of December, 1981,

using a McPhar vertical loop, reconnaissance electromagnetic unit operat

ing on a frequency of 1,000 cycles per second.

The McPhar unit is suitable for use as both a reconnaissance and

relatively detailed instrument. In this survey, the transmitter was held

vertically at a distance of 200 feet from the receiver; the receiver was

then tilted above the axis joining the two coils until a null was

observed. Both transmitter and receiver were moved on the same picket

line, 200 feet apart, and readings were recorded at 100' intervals. Under

these operating conditions a depth penetration of 100 feet was attained.

Note that the transmitter was stationed to the north of the receiver

throughout the survey.

Walkie-talkie units were used when required for proper communica

tion between transmitter and receiver.

A total of 558 stations was recorded during the course of the

survey.

The results of this work are shown on the accompanying Electro

magnetic Profile Plan on a scale of one inch equals 200 feet. Profiles

have been plotted on a scale of one inch equals 200 .

Crossovers on the property have been grouped into four categories.

- 5 -_____________'_________________

jtthese are described as follows: -

1) Extremely weak - (+1 0 , -1 0 ) - nine have been recorded on the claimsand are probably due to conductive layers in the overburden.

2) Weak - (+2 0 , -1 0 ) - four have been recorded during the survey andalthough these conductors may be caused by the overburden, further surveying, using an MS-1000 unit, is planned.

3) Weak to moderate - a crossover (+20 , -20 ) has been recorded online 28E on claim P-598864 and may be associated with the weak crossovers on lines 24E and J2E. A crossover (+1 0 , -3 0 ) on line 28E on claim P-598865 also warrants detailed surveying.

4) A moderate, broad crossover (+50 * ,-50 ) occurs on line 24E on claimP-598866 and is associated with the northeasterly trending anomaly delineated by the magnetometer survey. MS-1000 surveying is planned for this promising conducting zone*

Magnetometer Survey:

A magnetometer survey was conducted on the property by J. Goodger

and K. Gray during the mid-part of December, 1981. Readings were recorded

using two Fluxgate units, Model MF-1, Serial Nos, 40910? and 60?220,

having sensitivities of 20, 50, 200, 500 and 2,000 gammas as per division

for the corresponding scales.

Prior to the survey the instruments had been checked and adjust

ed so that a gamma value of 1,220 corresponds closely with an absolute

value of 57,599*15- Munro-Beatty Sill base station No. 2 was used for

this purpose.

Base control stations were established on the grid as follows:

B.C.S. No. 1 - on the south boundary of the claims on line 20E (at

access road junction) - value - 1585 gammas

B.C.S. No. 2 - on the base line at line 16E -value - 1620 gammas

B.C.S. No. 3 - on the base line at line 0+00- value - 1525 gammas

Ihiring the course of the survey the base control stations were

observed at two-hour intervals as a check on the working condition of the

instrument and to record the daily diurnal variation.

ft,Stations were spaced at 50' intervals along the base and picket

rhes and a total of 759 was recorded during the course of the survey.

The results of the survey are shown on the accompanying Magnet

ometer Profile Plan on a scale of one inch equals 200 feet. Profiles

have been plotted on a scale of one inch equals 4,000 gammas.

All available geological and geophysical data (listed previously)

had been reviewed and air photos studied prior to compiling this report.

Due, in part, to the moderate overburden depth, a majority of

the magnetic readings on the Radisson Creek claims range in value from

14-75 to 1675 gammas. Weaker magnetic intensities occur in the southeast

corner of the property - lows in the 1200's -and an isolated negative,

65 gammas, on line 8E on claim P-598870.

However, two narrow, northwesterly trending anomalies have been

delineated by the magnetometer survey. These have been outlined in dashed"

lines on the accompanying plan and have been coloured in red. The magnetic

intensity in the zone to the east of Radisson Creek ranges from 1800 to

2120 gammas, the westerly zone has intensities ranging from 1800 to 1995

gammas. These zones correspond to the regional trend of magnetic

anomalies shown on the Government aerial maps of the area.

Due to the complete lack of outcrops on the claims surveyed, and

in the immediate area, only a very generalized interpretation is possible.

However, based upon data obtained from the Government reports and maps,

previously listed, and the current survey results, it is assumed that

the claims are underlain by intermediate metavolcanics intruded by fingers

of porphyry emanating from a sizeable stock located to the northwest of

the property.

( Conclusions and Recommendations;

Several conducting zones, warranting additional exploration work,

have been delineated on the Radisson Creek Group.

Two, narrow magnetic anomalies have been outlined on the claims

SP:/

a^id are believed to be caused by porphyritic intrusives.

The combined - moderate, broad conductor and magnetic anomaly

on claim P-598866 may be of economic importance.

Due to these encouraging results it is recommended that detail

ed electromagnetic surveying be carried out during the early summer of

1982 using an MS-1000 unit.

Further work - diamond drilling - would be dependent upon the

results obtained from the survey.

Submitted: January 12tt, 1982 by: F. J. Evelegh

Exploration Manager

- 8 -

GEOL. LEGEND z diabase, diabase.

Granite 5a, Syenite 5b, Feldspar porphyry 5o, Quartz feldspar 5d, Felsite Je, Lamprophyre 5f*

Diorite) 4a, Gabbro diabase 4b,Bi"*ficc1s As ' Peridotite ft Dunite (Serpentinized) (Asb. - Asbestos recognized

Pyroxenite 4d,

Rhyolite fragmental lava

Andesite basalt pillow lava 2a, Diabasic lava 2b, Spherulitic lava 2o, Fragmental lava 2d, Tuff St chert 20, Talo-ohlorite- schist 2f.

Greywacke la, Arkose Ib, Quartzite lo, Argillite or shale Id, Conglomerate le, Iron formation If,. Chlorite schist lg.

Carbonate rook

Quartz veins

GEO-MfiG SYMBOLS

y*?.| Contour interval 500 gammas

Magnetic Base Control Station

*"*N| Geological ContactG- Geological

Fault Zone M- MagneticT- Topographic-

l-"-'l Mag. Profile

JOHNS MANVILLE CANADA INC.i

i.OCAT/6*) SKETCH - ) "*3

TOPO- SYMBOLS

C'.'.'? l Outcrop-"" " l Higher ground

Scarp

* * l Muskeg or Swamp

Creek

Drill hole

Direction fa which lava flows face, indicated by shape of pillowo . ,

ELECTRO-MAG SYMBOL**S EON 1C S JS UNI

Q o Uag^ailo Cond'uctor ® —— O Nil -.i 5 1. T- .••; Seal* - 20 uotfes B l inoh Wwrtr t SecurtA - Bra* (R*d) Eaat l North "Ntg. (Bluo)

l inch n

I-.....I .1.1.1 Scale -* 40 unitsi/- \i Conducting Zone - M ~1——l ' ' . W- Weak___.- flQNKA H.L. UNIT - . ---.

l x"'"" 1Jfl In.phase curve ' , -l0—Q l Out phase curve)NPCS Not proper coil spacingEast - Positive t ! . West -Negative___ W PH A R M. L; UNIT ...:..;.

1^—^ Dip angle profile North K East - Positive; South 6 West - Negative

Geol. Survey by- Mag. Survey by "E.M. Survey by -

CANADIAN JOHN6-MANVILLE CD. LTD.MTftflON MUNRO WfWE OH1MIO

•Mil

LEGENDPROVINCE OF ONTfl/UO

1 2 1992fiJIAWM -

- F--f- f-

42A07NW0110 2.4598 SHERATON 900

1983 06 09 2.4598

Mr. William L. GoodMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic li Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims PS98864 et al 1n the Sheraton A Thomas Township

The Geophysical (Electromagnetic a Magnetometer) Survey assessment work credits as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours veey truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

R. P1chette:mc

Encl.

cc: Johns-Manvllle Canada Inc. P.O. Box 610 Matheson. Ontario POK 1NO

cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario

.

Ministry of

' Ontario

Technical Assessment Work Credits

File

2.4598

1983 06 09

ta

fi l1"l,

wi it'

ll

1'

JE.'L

f-7

i?'

P

- J

jjf

bf:

S

E

li

Recorded Holder

JOHNS-MANVILLE CANADA INCTownship or Area

SHERATON 4 THOMAS TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

GeophysicalElectromagnetic 40 days

Magnetometer 20 days

Radiometric days

Induced polarization days

Section 86 (18) days

Geological days

Geochemical days

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision CX Ground CJl

Q Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

CD Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

P-598864 to P598870 Inclusive

Special credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims

lo credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not tufficiently covered by the survey L l Insufficient technical date filed

: the Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on f each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 60; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 86(18)430:

828

ntario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Notification of recording

of assessment work credits

Lands Administration Branch

Mining tends Section

Ministry of Natural Resources

Room 1617, Whitney Block

Queen's Park, Toronto

M7A 1W3

FEB 21988

Date of recording of work: January 22 t 1982___________

Recorded holder:____Johns - Manville Canada Inc.

Address: ————

Township or Area:_____SHERATON A THOMAS TOWNSHIP

Exploration Department, Box: 1500 Asbestos, Quebec JIT 3N2________

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

40

Magnetometer.

Radiometrlc

20

-days

-days

Jays

Induced polarization.

IcflL-days

-days

Geological. -days

Geochemical -days

Man days

Special provision

Airborne D

Ground L?

Mining clalmi

P-598864 tof598870 Incl.

Notice to recorded holder:

Survey reports and maps in duplicate be submitted to the Lands Administration Branch, Toronto with in 60 days from the date of recording of this work.

D Reports and maps are being forwarded to the Lands Administration Branch with this letter.

Mlnlng recorder c.c. Johns - Manville Canada Inc.

792 (6/77) LA. 065

K. Gray - Matheson J. Goodger - Timmins

MF-l Fluxgate Magnetometer

December 14, 15, 1981 14, 15, 1981

Pf j K. Gray - Matheson - December 16, 17, 18 /81 J. Goodger - Timmins - " 16, 17, 18 /81

McPhar R.E.M. Vertical Loop Electromagnetic Unit

R. Kaltwasser - Matheson - January 4, 1982 M. Bruce - " - Jan. 5 to 7 /82 J. Goodger -Timmins - Jan. 4 /82 H. Evans - Asbestos - Jan. 12 /82 F.J. Evelegh - Asbestos - Jan. 8, 11 /82

Draughting, Interpretation, Report,

Work to be filed under Special Provision.

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

EIVED

THE MINING ACT REPORT OF WORK

-m-A perat* form l*

type recorded.

51982IDS SECTION

To the Recorder of ...........rST...S..M...........M... M.....M..:...............;M..M..M.M..........M.M.MlnlBg Divisioni Johns-Manville Canada Inc. A23294If t X.....l................ll.l..^...I.......l. l l.........l,.....l.., l ...(o.l...,I.O...I.(..(.......II...........X......I.X..I.I................I

name of Recorded Holder Prospector's LicenceExploration Department, Box 1500, Asbestos, Quebec JIT 3N2 -M.......-...-....................................^

do hereby report the performance of .....A?!).................,.......... days of ............flf;9J?.^?.1.9AL.^!!^ft)^..

not before reported to be applied on the following contiguous claims

Claim No, P-598864

P-598865 P-598866

P.T5.98867 P-598868 P-598869

Days 60

J.9.. 60* tT* * * *

6060

Claim Ne, P-598870

Days

60••••••t

••t**4*

.. type of work

Claim No. Days

OCOa: O

Z UJxoo2a.at'

All the work was performed on Mining Claim (s) .............?Al^..a.?..5l).9.Y.e...................................................(In the cose of geological and/or geophysical survey (s) where more than 18 claims are involved attach o schedule)

READ CAREFULLY; THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED BY THE MINING RECORDER.

For Manual Work, Stripping or Opening up of Mines, Sinking Shafts or Other Actual Mining Operations - Names andaddresses of the men who performed the work and the dates and hours of their employment.For Diamond and other Core Drilling - Footage, No. and angle of holes and diameter of core. Name and address ofowner or operator of drill. Dates when drilling was done. Signed core log and sketch in duplicate. ;For Compressed Air or Other Power Driven or Mechanical equipmentType of drill or equipment. Names and addresses of men engaged in operating equipment ond the dotes and hours oftheir employment.For Power Stripping - Type of equipment. Name and address of owner or operator. Amount expended. Dates on whichwork was done. Proof of actual cost must be submitted within 30 days of recording.With each of the above types of work sketches are required to show the location ond extent of the work in relationto the nearest claim post. In the case of diamond or other core drilling the sketch must be submitted in duplicate.For Geophysical, Geological, Geochernical Surveys ond Expenditure Credits - the name of author of report. Coveringdates of survey {linecutting A office). Type of instrument used. Total amount of expenditure. Technical reports,maps,expenditure breakdown, receipts must be filed in duplicate with the Minister within 60 days of recording.For Land Survey - the nom'e ond address of Ontario Land surveyor.

The Required Information is os Follows: (Attach a list if this space is insufficient)

R, KaltwasserM. BruceJ. GoodgerK. Gray

- Matheson - Nov. 20, 23, 24 /81" - Nov. 20, 23 /81

- Timmins - Nov. 23 to 27, Nov. 30 to Dec. 4, Dec. 7 to 11 /81- Matheson - Nov. 20, 23 to 27, Nov. 30 to Dec. 4, Dec. 7 to 11/81

Line cutting and chaining; all personnel are Company employees.

Date .......K h* t ••j •(^•**-o7| ••••••••••••\* J****t**** ••••••**

re, of Recorded HolderJor Agent'Signature of Recorded Holde/Jor AgentF.J.Eveiegh, Exploration Manager

Of O

t/)UJ

yIJL

H

UJU

o<t- u: O Q. UJ Of l/*x

Zuj a-

s

The Mining Act Certificate Verifying Report of Work

(Post Office Address)* ^••••••••••*tte*eeeee*ee*eeeeeeeeee*eeteeeeeeeeeeeeeet*ee**eeeee*e*

hereby certify:

1. That l have o personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the report of work annexed here to, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion. - - -

Ou.

•zUJ Q.UJX

v J

Ministryof Geotechnical

ReTees ^Ontario Approval

Fll*

Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics

Commentf

f"] W ish to fee again with correction!

To: Geology- ExpendituresComment*

Approved |~| With to tee again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

Approved Q With to see again with correctionsDate Signature

r l [To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)p;

r 1893(61/10)

Ministryof GeotechnicalNatural RennrtResources RePort

Ontario Approval

Flle

Mining Lands Comments

lo: Geophysics

Comments

fei-:ir

Q Approved |~Vwi*h to see again with correction* Signet

To: Geology - ExpendituresComments

f] Approved f~l W ish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

\Approved y f~1wiwish to see again with corrections

Date Signature

S j JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1693(81/10)

1982 12 31 2.4598

Johns-Manv111e Canada Incorporated Asbestos, Quebec JIT 3N2

Attention*. Mr. F.J. Evelegh

Dear Sirs:

Enclosed are your electromagnetic survey plans covering Mining Claims P 598864 to 70 Inclusive In Sheraton and Thomas Township. Please show the raw data (readings) at each station, provide a key nap and return the plans to this office.

For further Information, 1f required, please contact Mr. F.H. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

F. W. Hatthewslsc

Encls:

cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

1982 03 12 2.4598

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Reaourcaa60 Wilson AvenueTinmins, OntarioPAN 287

Dear Sirt

We have received report* and mapa for a Geophyaical (Electro magnetic and Magnetometer) Survey aubadtted under Special Provision* (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claim* P 598864 et al in the Townahip* of Sheraton and Thorne*.

This material will be examined and a**e**ed and a atetament of aa*e**ment work credit* will be i**ued.

Your* very truly,

E.F. AnderconDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phonet 416/965-1316

J. Skura/

cci Johns-Manville Canada Aabesto*, Quebec Attn: 7.J. Evelegh

Johns-Manvilie Canada Inc.Division de la fibre d'amlante Asbestos Fibre Division

Asbestos, Quebec J1T 3N2CanadaTelephone: 819-879-5431Telex: 05-836157

March 2nd, 1982

Lands Administration BranchMining Lands Section ^Ministry of Natural Resources MAR 5 1982Room 161?Whitney Block, Queen's Park MINING LANDi SU.JOPToronto, Ontario K7A 1W3Dear Sir:

Enclosed find "Report and Maps", in duplicate, covering geo physical surveys completed on mining claims held by this Company in Sheraton and Thomas Townships.

Special Provision Form is attached.

Note that the "Report of Work" form for these surveys has beenfiled with the Mining Recorder in Timmins.

Yours very truly,

F. J. Evelegh Exploration Manager

cc:Mr. W. Good, Mining Recorder, Timmins, Ont,J. M. Sharratt - DenverG. McDonald - "W. M. Bruce - Mathesonfile

Ends

REGISTERED MAIL

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT- FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey (s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—

G-eophyaJ-calSheraton and JEhomasJohns-Manville Canada Inc.

J. EveleghSurvey Company __^__Author of Report ,: 'Address of AnthnrBox 1500, Asbestos T Quebec J1T: 3N2Covering Dates of Snrvpy Nov 20/81 to Jan 11/82;

(linecutting to office)Total Miles of Line rtit 7.2'_____;________;_______

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

DAYS per claimGeophysical

—Electromagnetic —— Mi20

—Radiometric-OtherGeological.Geochemical

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne nirveyt)

Magnetometer Electromagnetic Radiometric(enter days per claim) *

HATE- March 2,1982 SIHMATTTRP.. '^"Author of Report or Agent

Res. GeoL. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED LUt numerically

(number)

P 598.869****t*1t**f *tt**i******f ••••***trt*T*WtT*O*l*'#******i

tpJlf •••f***tl*^t********tRllA^pt

MINING UNDS SEC*ION

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations Mag - 739; E.M. - 338 Station interval Mag - 50'; E.M. - 100'

Profile scale——

.Number of - 8071 E.M. - 550

Mag - 1"__Line spacing.

400Q g; E.M. - 1" - 200

400'

Contour interval.

Instrument Pliiygate Magnetometers t Model MF-1 T Serial No B. 4-0^107 fe 607220 Accuracy - Scale constant ______gftt* attaohftd photncopy________;——^——^—--—- Diurnal correction mpthnH all readings corrected to value of Base Station #1

Base Station check-in interval (hours)_____2 hqurs_____________________________^—Base Station location and value No. 1 - on south boundary on line.20E. value 1585 gammasNo. 2 - on base line at picket line 16E - ; value 1620 gammas,^^——-—..—,.No. 3 - on base line at picket line 0*00- value 1525 gammas

JELECtRQtoAGNETICCoil configurationCoil s*"p3ratinn .

AccuracyMethod: Frequency

Vertical200'

D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back 03 In line1 i, 0^^ r ' 1 "P i 8 1

7 f {ipedfy V.L.F. lUtion)

D Parallel line

Parameters measured

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections tnadq.

Base station valqe and location.

Elevation afccurdcy

InstrumentMethod D Time Domain Parameters — On time —.—

- Off time __— Delay time ———.— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing. Type of electrode

D Frequency Domain— Frequency .——-— Range_______

SELF POTENTIALInstrument.——————————————————————————————————————— Range.

l Survey Method ———————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument ,——Values measured.Energy windows (levels)____________________________________. Height of instrument_________________________Background Count. Size of detector————^—^————————^—^—————————....^^^—.—^Overburden ______._____________________________________,

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey——————————————————————— Instrument ———————————————————————— Accuracy—————————————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy—————^^—————————

(specify for each type of survey)Aircraft used———————————————————————————————Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area———.^^^^^—^—^———^^——————Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

li Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb, ,'2nj;^ Ni.^rjCo," Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

.tests)Field Analysis (-LiExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory Analysis No.(.—————^—^-

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, cruimng, atning)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis,.———

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used.——

Commercial Laboratory (~ Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method.__ Analytical Method—— Reagents Used^^^^^.

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General -

II?* * ". """* ~"

l STIK

SPECIFICATIONS OF FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER MODEL MF-1

Ranges:

Meter:

Accuracy:Operating Temperature:

Temperature Stability:- Noise Level: Long Term Stability:Bucking Adjustments:

(Latitude)

Recording.putput:

Response: Connector: Batteries:

Consumption: Dimensions:

Weights:

Plus or minus— - , ' '1,000 gammas f. se. ' . .3,000 " '

10,000 " . . - ,30,000 -" . . .

100,000 " . . 'Sensitivity

20 gammas/div. . , V50 " .' ' - v200 " ; :

500 " . : ' " '• 2,000 " . -. ' - ' ;: ; .Taut-band suspension . . ..':''1000 gammas scale \Vt" long—50 div.3000 gammas scale 111/16" long ~- 60 div. : . -.1000 to 10,000 gamma ranges ± Q.5% of full scale' -; * 30,000 and 100,0000 gamma ranges ± l */* of full scale -40*Cto4-40*C~40*Fto-l-10Q'F . :: ' Less than 2 gammas per *C (l gamma /*F) Total l gamma P-P . : V i l gamma for 24 hours at constant temperature - 10,000 to 75,000 gammas by 9 steps of approximately 8,000 gam mas and fine control by 10 turn potentiometer. Convertible for southern hemisphere or ± 30,000 gammas equatorial. .1.7 ma per oersted for 1000 to 100,000 gamma ranges with ' maximum termination of 15,000 ohms, . . DC to 5 cps {3db down) Amphenoi 91-MC3F1 -12 x 1.5V-flashIight batteries "C" cell type)

(AC Power supply available)50 milliamperesInstrument-6V4" x 3V4" x 12V4"

165 x 90 x 32.0 mm Battery pack-4" x 2" x 7"

100 x 50 x 180 mm . Shipping Container —10" dia x 16"

254 mm dia. x 410 mm Instrument — 5 Ibs. 12 oz. 2.6 kg. Battery Pack — 2 Ibs. 4 oz. 1.0 kg. Shipping —13 Ibs. 6.0kg. :

i^^

SCiSSITREX79 Mortin Row Avenue,

UIVJ1TEDDownwiew, Onlorio. Conoda

•4 l

SHERATON TOWJNSHIONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES PORCUPINE MINING D IVISION

DEC ~ i 1382DISTRICT OF COCHRANE. M.386

Ministry of NaluralFtews f S C A L- E. 4 O CHAINS TO ONE. INCH

BOND TWR

N

Areas wil i\

IOg under Section

8 7 ^6 5TIMMINS TWR 4001 SurUc* rights reservation around oil lakes and river*.

PATE.N \ E.O L.ANOS CROWN LAND

42A07NW0110 2.4598 SHERATON

lo"

Macklem Twp. (M.295)

N i g h t h o w K

p l p i p583617 15836165*583641 l583625'58362458361915838)001533605

.' DtJiSMU J983BM l l J

5838I2 583643 l 583630 5 83 6 271 58 3623 . 583620

——l—— ——————P ' P

J5B3644 l 5 636 2 9 l 58362 8 J58362 2 1583 62 l

[552287~~rP — i x

55Z289 ,' l l '..-—-' 5 52286 552283,- —^—* — —L — — 4- — ~f-

P IP IP

627601 J6275\96

6492 (64989P645* 9 O

4aA07NW81l0 2.4598 SHERATON210

Blackstock Twp. (M.263)

THE TOWNSHIPOF

THOMASDISTRICT

COCHRANE

PORCUPINErtlNING D IVISION

SCALE: 1 -INCH CHAINS

LEGEND

n.VIENTED LANDGROWN LAND S AIFLtASESl O CATED LAND(.(CENSE OF OCCUPATION MINING RIGHTS ONI.V SURFACF RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADS KING'S HIGHWAYS " RAILWAYS POWER LINES MARSH O R MUSKEG

MINES CANCELLFM

c.y. CDLot.l ,0,

M.H.O. S.R.O.

400 Surface Rights Reservation around all lakes and rivers.

Reserve Flooding Rights to H. E. P C, ofOntario to elevation 903-5 T. a N. O.Railway Datum on Night Hawk Lake

This township lies within the Municipality of CITY of TIMMINS .

Areas withdrawn from staking under Section 43 of the Mining Act ( R.s.o. 1970). Order No. F ile Date DispositionR.W. 10/81 1 88545

W.72/80 (64584

W. 16/82

6/5/81

20/7/81

19/11/82

S.R 8 M,R.

S.R.O.

S.R. ft M.R.

DATE OF ISSUE

OcC " i 1382

Minislryof Ka;uralRssc^:cos S rnr.'ft;.! rn t

PLAN N 0 - 3 l 2

D\T\R!O

MINISTRY OF N ATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING B RANCH

GIBSON LAKE ROAD

CO CD CD CO Qin

G-5r\] CO

42A07NWaiie 2.4598 SHERATON as®

MAPPED BY - J. GOODGERTOPOGRAPHIC PLAN JAN 1 2 1982

^ JOHNS MANVILLE CANADA INC.

ONT. 1". 200' RADISSON CREEK GR.-THOMAS 8, SHERATON TWPS,

O

. o

/.-J

CX)

iCM

42A07NW0H0 3.4598 SHERATON 330

lGIBSON LAKE ROAD

CD 00 00en in

00*4*t

J.M',-1*)1

LJJ f\J

v --0

4...-i

r" ii ' *\ \

•-

*'

UJ

CO m

LOT 11

tt'

-f-"

-H-''

4-UJ

LO

BA-.b: , i 1Mb.

CON, H CON. I

THOMAS TWP.

SHERATON TWP.

l \

ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PROFILE PLANINSTRUMENT-McPHAR R.E.M.UNIT - SERIAL NO. 30-6507 INLINE METHOD -200'SPACING -PROFILE 20*'T OPERATOR - J.GOODGER

REVISED

JAN 1 O 1983 f 2 1982

ONT. T-200 RADISSON CREEK

JOHNS MANVILLE CANADA'"^'"'SHERATON "T

r

o;;j'S4S

\ tS4f

\W

/(.'f

fSt,f

fStS

'sts

r/S/S

•/J2S1

t /tss

\ /si*

SflQl

j /f7S

\'*7S

. / ffi.'

: /i/f

i /X7Sl

f f S19

\ff2f

• f if i

f./ttl

"Sif

l f BC

CO

CO 00

in//f*. 2 "'

ttif/*-f*

r ffi* ' ftff

4 ' f

/St* • /At

G^

5rg

* * S ^ ^ v^ ?

GO

n lGIBSON LAKE

ROAD

'i:;Ti t**

- ii

J f i

, t*i

i'"

"'tv fa

:'it

. ft— — -j

- '*

.3

..A

, 4 /a1 f. 1*

,.o/3

H

•/V

/fi

U- '4

- r"

i"^ - ill

* 'f* ^""" r

..

i*

-^ /e"v

j;i H

\ r

1

i

t

i

....^1

\ ''t *

" l '.'i-

;l i

/i i 1

\ *

t '

.

" : ; . '' i

- - t

LiJr\jm—i

*5. . .Y*w fT* ,

VS, J. .1*u!,J40J -f, x

W __ .. ' '

to. . ,—— —;'* inIS CD, ' ^

" s - 00CD ,

v* m -w .

V*

vi

- ijoto - .

*** ' ! '. ."rio, \tf .

Af

".J! i^1 S .if 4 -? 4c i^ p ^ f C" *f -si- -*— - . ^^-^- "^,J30 i "~"rf .- 1

xj 5 7,vo :X" j X M ! X v

/ \s*s -' \ ^ -/ •••\

iVO,' \H.,/" v*T ": ^J;0. (J)

005^5 GO

O)y 0- in ^, ; —st s ^ ^ ^ "ii-^H'/-

,,| , ,3-/C

l*W

^s 1^

4^01

3?a

1^i**

ifj -i1

-^*5-

/4VO

/u-s*vo

/*^

/**^

itrf

^t*1 -

,^S :

rf'*'^

/i f C-

A" (*Vi1/^w .

ttfo

i jO -

j t*rfy

,*w

,***

, fr jo

/ftfO

/4VO

w 'lvl

1vofr^ -?x

!. t f\/ffiO

if)0

,w,W

t ^---'- •^-iH^o

* t V'S

ttw

. .fuO

. i7tf

' -^L.-

r/**/Ilf00'j.

. t*M,ii '"^t!j'

/^5hrifrSj

: -3so!

*w^d*JW,

Jjv^

J

V ;'

\^^^:

-

j 3 1 : f i ,^ ^ ^ ? V ^^ -^-*— i~. ——— i ——ti\ i :1\ :V^' 'i . -Y '

' \

: \i "~"tn ~~" — " — " ~-~ ~-"

LIcuCr

VfS0.

^ i5

w j

^J

i^C^^i l-Qc* *

1 T/ K

l

/S^'

(445

. is

/HfcS

c/t.5

|'

Z* j,,rf*WC

To '!L !'T1

siy^f _ ...BASEiLIJSE,t,S l

/t/f !^* p i.6*0

i i,iS .

i (r ^f

tfo '

i7'S \

s ii?iS ;

f1

,ntr .^^— ' - 'l' 7^ '"j

/*'f

K*f

t f to 1

T3o

, 3J

^ 3 -y J

,^!

/3*jij1;iv ]

'^ CON. Hy CON. "i-s

5")"1

LOT 11

MAGNETOMETER PROFILE PLANINSTRUMENTS - MF1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETERS

SERIAL NOS. 409107 A 607220 PROFILE - l"-4000qOPERATORS - K.GRAY 8* J . GOODGER

\42A87NW01I0 2.4598 SHERATON 240 JAN 1 2 1982

JOHNS MANVILLE CANADA INC.

ONT. r- 200' RADISSON CREEK GR.-THOMAS 8, SHERATON TWPS.