42334-014: Rural Roads Improvement Project II · Project Number: 42334-014 April 2020 Cambodia:...

Safeguards Due Diligence Report

Project Number: 42334-014 April 2020

Cambodia: Rural Roads Improvement Project II

Prepared by Ministry of Ministry of Rural Development for the Asian Development Bank.

This safeguards due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein

do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may

be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation

of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian

Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any

territory or area.

iii

ABBREVIATION

ADB - Asian Development Bank

AIDS - Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

CRCP - Continue Reinforced Concrete Pavement

DBST - Double Bituminous Surface Treatment

DDIS - Detailed Design and Implementation Supervision

DDR - Due Diligence Report

EA - Executing Agency

EDCF - Economic Development Cooperation Fund (Korea)

EMP - Environmental Management Plan

FGD - Focus Group Discussion

GAP - Gender Action Plan

GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism

IA - Implementing Agency

IP - Indigenous People

IR - Involuntary resettlement

KEXIM - Export-Import Bank of Korea

MEF - Ministry of Economy and Finance

MOU - Memorandum of Understanding

NGO - non-government organization

PAM - Project Administration Manual

PDRD - Provincial Department of Rural Development

PMU - Project Management Unit

RRIP - Rural Road Improvement Project

RoW - Right of way

RP - Resettlement Plan

SES - Socioeconomic Survey

SEO - Social and Environment Office

SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 (of ADB)

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

Kilometer - Km Meter - m Kilogram - Kg Cubic meter - Cum

iv

NOTE

In this report, “$” refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated. This Due Diligence Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

v

Table of Contents ABBREVIATION....................................................................................................................... iii

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ................................................................................................... iii

NOTE ...................................................................................................................................... iv

PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 1

A. Background .................................................................................................................................................. 1

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OUTPUTS ........................................................................ 1

A. Description of the Additional Roads Under the RRIP II by Location ................................. 2

III. DETAILED ENGINEER DESIGN ........................................................................................ 2

A. Proposed Road Width ..................................................................................................... 2

IV. METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE DUE DILIGENCE ........................................................ 7

V. DUE DILIGENCE FINDINGS .............................................................................................. 7

A. Land Acquisition ......................................................................................................................................... 7

B. Involuntary Resettlement ................................................................................................. 8

C.Indigenous Peoples ......................................................................................................... 8

D.Brief Socio-Economic and Demographic Profile of the Project Areas ...................................... 8

VI. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ........................ 9

VII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ........................................................................... 11

VIII. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .............................................................................. 14

A. Project Management Unit (PMU ............................................................................................. 14

IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................. 14

List of Figures

Figure 1: Typical Section A (W=8.0m, DBST) ............................................................................ 2

Figure 2: Typical Section B (W=7.0m, DBST) ............................................................................ 2

Figure 3: Typical Section C (W=7.0m, DBST) ............................................................................ 3

Figure 4: Typical Section A (W=8.0m, CRCP) ............................................................................ 3

Figure 5: Typical Section B (W=7.0m, CRCP) ............................................................................ 3

Figure 6: Typical Section C (W=5.0m, CRCP) ............................................................................ 3

Figure 7: Typical Section D (W=5.0m, CRCP) ............................................................................ 3

Figure 8: Typical Section E (W=5.0m, CRCP) ............................................................................ 4

Figure 9: Typical Section F (W=6.0m, CRCP) ............................................................................ 4

Figure 10: Location of the Additional Roads for the RRIP II Project............................................ 6

List of Tables

Table 1: Summary of Additional Roads ...................................................................................... 5

Table 2: Summary of Total Number of Participants .................................................................. 10

1

PROJECT BACKGROUND

A. Background

1. The Rural Road Improvement Project (RRIP) II or referred to in this report as” the Project” will rehabilitate about 1,200 km of priority rural roads in ten provinces (Tboung Khmum, Kampong Cham, Kampong Thom, Siem Reap, Banteay Meanchey, Battambang, Pursat, Kampong Speu, Kampong Chhnang, and Takeo). Most of these roads are located around Tonle Sap Basin. The project will provide a reliable all-year road access from provincial towns and agricultural rural areas to markets, employment centers, and social services in the area of influence. Over a million rural residents will be benefited by the project. The rehabilitated roads will provide the poor rural provinces with a safer, cost-effective rural road network with all-year access to markets and other social services. The Project is being implemented by the Ministry of Rural Department.

2. ADB approved the loan for the abovementioned Project on 8 August 2014 for $54 million (equivalent to SDR34,918,000 from ADB’s Special Funds resources by paving 729 kilometers (km) of rural roads in 10 provinces. The ADB loan funds the civil works, related consulting services, equipment, and project management. The Government of Australia, through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade or DFAT, finances all outputs except the Connectivity Improvement of the Mekong River Islands and Efficient Project Management, through a $ 6.67 million grant. Korea Eximbank (KEXIM) of the Government of Korea finances the civil works and related consulting services through a $41 million loan, while the Nordic Development Fund finances the output of climate change adaptation framework of investments under the Connectivity Improvements of the Mekong River Islands Output through a Euro 4.5 million ($5.4 million equivalent grant). Loan effectivity of the ADB loan was on 23 December 2020 and will close on 31 December 2020.

3. On 8 December 2015, ADB approved additional co-financing for rehabilitating further 471 km of rural roads, in the amount of $74.48 million, which makes the total Project costs of $192.71 million. Of which the Government of Cambodia finances the local taxes and duties amounting to $17.79 million for the entire project.1 Overall physical progress for the civil works under the original financing portion is almost completed with 98.79% and over 45% for the additional financing portion as of end of 4th quarter 2019. For the combined original and additional financing portions was 82.85%.

4. Under the RRIP II, additional roads with a total length of 79.29 km located in 16 communes within five provinces (Kampong Speu, Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Thom, Kampong Cham, and Tboung Khmum) are proposed for improvement from its existing laterite condition to DBST/ concrete road. This due diligence report (DDR) for social safeguards is for the existing additional rural roads being proposed by MRD for improvement under the RRIP II. The projects under the original an additional financing portions of the Project is Category C for Involuntary Resettlement as per ADB Safeguards Policy Statement (SPS), 2009. The roads for improvement under the project are existing, and the additional proposed 79.29 km roads for improvement are also the existing rural roads.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OUTPUTS

5. The RRIP II including the additional roads have five key outputs, namely: Output 1: Rural Road Rehabilitation. The project will pave 1,200 km of rural roads using double bituminous surface treatment (DBST) and reinforced concrete. This output also includes DDIS consulting services.

6. Output 2: Rural Road Asset Management. The project will improve rural road asset management in a sustainable manner through a strong capacity-building program, including an

1 DB MOU for the Joint Loans and Grants Review Mission for Loan 3151(COL)Grant 01401 (NDF)/Grant 0402(GOA)/Kexim Loan KHM16/L8299(AFD)L8300(SCF)/Grant-467(SCF) held of 18 November to 2 December 2019.

2

axle load control program. 7. Output 3: Rural Road Safety and Community Awareness Program. The awareness and application of road safety and safeguards will be increased by: (a) implementing a rural community-based road safety program; b) implementing an HIV/AIDS and human trafficking prevention program; and (c) conducting a sex-disaggregated baseline socioeconomic survey of beneficiaries.

8. Output 4: Efficient Project Management. The project also includes project management support for MRD. The project will have substantial positive employment and gender impacts in the rural communities. The project therefor includes a labor and gender mainstreaming action plan that is associated with all the project outputs.

9. Output 5: Connectivity Improvements of Mekong River Islands. Connectivity to and within highly vulnerable Mekong River Islands will be improved with concrete roads and jetties. A climate change adaptation framework will also be designed with complementary investments to be implemented to support the isolated islands.

B. Description of the Additional Roads Under the RRIP II by Location

10. The proposed additional roads with a total length of 79.29 km are located in 16 communes within 5 provinces (Tboung Khmum, Kampong Cham, Kampong Thom, Kampong Speu, and Kampong Chhnang). It will benefits a total of 166,797 population including 85,208 (or 51%) women, and with a total of 34,208 households (38,969 families)2 and of which 6,132 are women headed households. The project will also benefits around 2,423 poor households (level 1 poor) and 3,772 level 2 poor households (see Appendix H: Socio-demographic data of the project areas under the additional roads located in 16 communes of 5 provinces.

DETAILED ENGINEER DESIGN

C. Proposed Road Width

11. The proposed roads can be classified into 9 types based which was designed considering the regional topographic condition, inundation and local traffic pattern such high portion of motorbike as shown below:

Figure 1: Typical Section A (W=8.0m, DBST)

Figure 2: Typical Section B (W=7.0m, DBST)

2 Commune Council demographic data as of December 2019.

3

Figure 3: Typical Section C (W=7.0m, DBST)

Figure 4: Typical Section A (W=8.0m, CRCP)

Figure 5: Typical Section B (W=7.0m, CRCP)

Figure 6: Typical Section C (W=5.0m, CRCP)

Figure 7: Typical Section D (W=5.0m, CRCP)

4

Figure 8: Typical Section E (W=5.0m, CRCP)

Figure 9: Typical Section F (W=6.0m, CRCP) 12. The width of the carriageway of the Project road was planned in consideration such factor as proposal and technical Assistance Report, the existing road width by route, traffic volume, design speed, construction cost, etc. Carriageway widths were designed to be different ranging from 4.0m to 6.0m, and nine types were proposed.

13. Road shoulder is important road facilities which have such functions as prevention of traffic congestion by separating disabled vehicles and temporary pullout vehicles from the main carriageway and as protection of the ends of the road pavement structure. Shoulder widths were designed to be different ranging from 1.0m to 0.5m for 4 types road. In particular, margin of 0.5m both sides of the 3 Mekong Islands was planned for protection the concrete pavement carriageway.

14. Designed pavement type including double bituminous surface treatment (DBST) and continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) had been considered. The CRCP type which is resilient to the climate change will be applied to the proposed roads which are located at the flood prone area and downtown area without rise up the road elevation (project roads at 5 Mekong Island and Peam Chilaing). The DBST pavement type will be applied to normal condition of the proposed roads (see Table 1).

15. As shown in Table 1 below, there will be 28 additional roads proposed for improvement from its existing condition which is made of laterite or earth works to DBST and or concrete reinforced type of road (CRCP) for the specific roads to be improved located 12 roads in Tboung Khmum,11 roads in Kampong Cham, 1 road in Kampong Thom, 1 road in Kampong Speu and 3 roads in Kampong Chhnang.

16. The proposed road improvement varies by road section as the project will improve only the existing roads with a road width ranging from an average of 5m to 6m, while some roads that are already existing which are wider have a width from 6.5m to 9m.

17. The DBST and CRCP typical cross section with 8m width, 1 vertical:2 horizontal and the approximately Corridor of Impact (CoI) 9m~12m function with rise-up elevation along the roads section. However, this typical cross section will not rise-up and submerge during flooding. The CoI has been confirmed within the existing road boundary with no impacts and has been discussed during consultation meetings held in the project area.

5

18. The DBST and CRCP typical cross section with 7m width, 1 vertical: 2 horizontal and the CoI approximately at 8m~11m function with rise-up elevation along the roads section will not rise-up and submerge during flooding. The CoI has been confirmed within the existing road boundary with no impacts and has been discussed during consultation. Likewise, the CRCP typical cross section with 5m width, 1 vertical:2 horizontal and the CoI approximately at 6m~7m function with rise-up elevation along the roads section will not rise-up and submerge during flooding. The CoI has been confirmed within the existing road boundary with no impacts and has been discussed during consultation.

19. The summary of the additional roads for improvement presented by road, road section, district commune name, and the description of the length (in km) and width (in m), and the proposed design are presented in Table 1 below. The detailed description of the proposed improvements is presented in Appendix F.

Table 1: Summary of Additional Roads

No. Road

ID Road Section

District Name

Commune

Length (Km)

Existing Width (m)

DED Proposed Widt

h (m)

Corridor of Impact

requires (m)

Proposed Design

Tboung Khmum 1 TBK1

Peam Chilaing Tboung Khmum

Peam Chilaing

2.16 7.5~8.1 8.0 9~12 Concret

e (CRCP)

2 TBK1A 0.23 7.0~7.5 7.0 8~11 3 TBK2 0.54 6.9~7.0 7.0 8~11 4 TBK3 0.10 7.0~7.2 5.0

5 TBK4 Phume 67 -

Thmar Pech Ti 2

Tboung Khmum

Thmor Pich

5.64 6.9~7.5 7.0 8~11

DBST

6 TBK5 Tuol Sophy -

Srespey Oraing Ov

Toul Sophy, Korg Chey

9.68 6.0~7.5 7.0 8~11

7 TBK6 Kilo 23 -

Trapaing Pring Memot, Dambe

Rumchek, Trapaing

Pring 11.72 6.9~7.5 7.0 8~11

8 TBK7 Kilo 30 - Sok

San Memot Rumchek 8.18 7.0~7.5 7.0 8~11

9 TBK8 Kraleung Soth

- Chan MoulDBST

Memot Chan Moul

9.49 7.9~8.2 8.0 9~12

10 PI 11 Road in Koh

Pir Krochhmar Koh Pir

1.66 5.0~5.5 5.0 6~7 Concrete

(CRCP) 11 PI 12 0.99 5.0~5.6 5.0 6~7 12 PI 13 1.03 5.0~5.2 5.0 6~7

Sub total 51.42 Kampong Cham

1 SA 5 Road in Koh Samroang

Kampong Siem

Koh Samroan

g 1.28 5.0~5.5 5.0 6~7

Concrete

(CRCP)

2 MI 1E Road In Koh Mitt

Kampong Siem

Koh Mitt 0.34 5.0~5.4 5.0 6~7

3 MI 1F 0.48 5.0~5.6 5.0 6~7 4 ST 1C

Road in Koh Sotin

Kampong Siem

Koh Sotin

0.5 5.0~5.2 5.0 6~7 5 ST 1D 0.65 5.0~5.5 5.0 6~7 6 ST 1E 0.21 5.0~5.3 5.0 6~7 7 ST 6 1.8 5.0~5.6 6.0 6~7

6

8 ST 7 0.85 5.0~5.1 5.0 6~7 9 ST 8 2.01 5.0~5.3 5.0 6~7

10 ST 9 1.2 5.0~5.6 5.0 6~7 11 ST 10 0.33 5.0~5.2 5.0 6~7

Sub total 9.65 Kampong Thom

1 KT5 Stuong - Tamoeu

Stuong Trea,

Bateay Stoung

8.27 8.0~9.0 8.0 9~12 DBST

Sub total 8.27 Kampong Speu

1 KSP1F

D Flood Damage

Section Phnom Srouch

Kirivaon 2.77 8.0~9.0 8.0 9~12 DBST

Sub total 2.77 Kampong Chhnang 1 KCH13

Khna Chhmar - Chrey Kaong

Sammeakki Mean Chey,

Teuk Phos

Khnar Chhmar,

Akphivadth

4.89 5.0 ~ 7.0 5.0~7.0 8~11

DBST 2

KCH13A

0.31 6.5~7.2 7.0 8~11

3 KCH14 Kraing Lvea -

Thnal

Sammeakki Mean Chey,

Kraing Lvea

1.98 6.9~7.5 7.0 8~11

Sub total 7.18

28 Grand Total 79.2

9

Source: MRD/DDIS for RRIP II, Jan 2020. 20. Figure 1 shows the location map of the RRIP II while the project location maps presented by Contract Work package for the proposed additional roads (79.29 km) are shown in Appendix G.

Figure 10: Location of the Additional Roads for the RRIP II Project

Source: RRIP II Third QPR, October 2019. MRD

7

METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE DUE DILIGENCE

21. The scope and objective of this due diligence report (DDR) is to present the findings from field verification of all proposed additional roads that there will be no potential IR and IPs related impacts in the project area according to the proposed detailed engineering design (DED). The original and additional financing portions of the project is category C as per ADB Social Safeguard Policy (SPS, 2009) for Involuntary Resettlement (IR). The roads proposed for improvement are existing rural roads and did not require land acquisition (LA). However, a Resettlement Framework was prepared for the RRIP II in 2014 to serve as a guiding document for project implementation, specifically on the management of any potential impacts related to social safeguards that may arise during the civil work stage.

22. During the preparation of this DDR, the social safeguards team, MRD’s project management unit (PMU)/ social and environment office (SEO) conducted site visits in all proposed roads for improvement under the RRIP II. The DDR involved the direct site visits, transect walk or ocular visit in the project areas, public consultation meetings, interviews, focus group discussions, and consultation meetings with the PMU and SEO, DDIS technical team, and other stakeholders. In addition to these, site demarcation based on the DED has been conducted by the project team and SEO officers, in the presence of the commune/ village leaders and community residents. 23. In addition to the information about the project discussed during the consultation meetings, the following information were also discussed: (i) grievance redress mechanism (GRM), (ii) the people’s perception of the proposed project, their worries and concerns, if any, and (iii) mitigation measures to address concerns and issues. A flyer or public information booklet which describes the project, the GRM process and whom to contact should people have complaints or clarifications were distributed to the commune leaders, and copy of the flyer posted in the Commune Council Office’s Public Notice Bulletin Board. 24. The village and the commune chiefs are the contact persons for the GRM at the village commune level. The people interviewed are already aware of the GRM and to whom to raise complaints, because the village/ commune leaders discuss this information and the existing GRM exists in-project area will be used for the project. Issues if not addressed at the commune level will be elevated to the district level. Details on this GRM with diagram are included in the flyers distributed to the commune leaders. The commune leaders keep records of complaints raised, and action taken. The MRD SEO Social safeguards officers, and the Provincial Department of Rural Roads (in each province) assisted by the project implementation consultants are actively involved in conducting consultation meetings with the local communities, and timely addressing any issues or concerns raised. by the commune leaders and residents in the project’s areas. 25. The safeguards team also gathered socio-demographic data from the commune councils of the project areas, and carried out consultation meetings with the commune and village leaders, school heads and students, and local villagers for the period September 2019 to December 2019.

DUE DILIGENCE FINDINGS

D. Land Acquisition

26. The additional roads proposed for improvement located in 16 communes in 5 provinces are existing roads which have a road width ranging from 5 m to 6 m. The road width varies by road location because the proposed improvement (design) has been adjusted according to the existing road length in order to avoid LAR impacts. These existing roads are commune roads, and some were maintained or improved using the commune development funds. However, the existing roads are made of laterite which is difficult to access or use during rainy season and when the water level of the Mekong River rises up that causes flooding in communes / villages within the Mekong islands. The roads are in bad condition due to mud and slippery which is not

8

safe for road users during rainy season. Also, the road is very dusty during dry season which is not convenient for the community residents especially among the children, women and elderly people, and those with respiratory health problems, aggravated by heavy dust during dry season.

27. No land acquisition is required in the additional roads under RRIP II because the roads are existing, and are already wide enough for the proposed detail engineering design. There may be few shrubs and small public trees that may be affected during the clearing stage, but these are located on the right of way (RoW) and are public lands. Overall, the safeguards team’ assessment consisting of the SEO and the DDIS consultants concluded that there will be no land acquisition and no adverse impacts to private assets of the households, and livelihoods of the people along the existing roads.

28. MRD and DDIS technical team have thoroughly assessed all proposed additional roads and the number of proposed roads reduced to 28 road lines of the 5 provinces (contract packages) with a total length of 79.29 km. The commune councils/ villagers wanted that the roads improvement to DBST should last longer up to 30 years. This is the reason why they sought for assistance from MRD/PDRD. Overall, the people, commune leaders and other stakeholders had expressed that they are happy to hear that the roads are going to be improved soon, and they are hoping that all the proposed roads will be upgraded to DBST. They have expressed full support to the project, and they will do whatever they could do to cooperate during project implementation, and even in road maintenance, if participation will be needed. The proposed road improvement is also an opportunity for household members including women of legal age with low income and/ or have no jobs, and are interested to work and earn income during civil works.

E. Involuntary Resettlement

29. The project Categorization for involuntary resettlement (IR) as per ADB SPS 2009 criteria is category C, as the road proposed for improvement in the additional roads will make use of the existing rural / commune roads, thus no road widening is required. Social safeguard impact assessment, demarcation based on the DED during site visits, and consultation meetings were conducted in the project area. The Screening Checklist for IR has been prepared (see Appendix A).

F. Indigenous Peoples

30. The categorization for indigenous peoples (IPs) as per ADB SPS 2009 criteria is category C. Social safeguard impact assessment in the project area has been conducted during the site visit, consultations with commune/ village leaders, and FGDs/ meetings with other stakeholders. There are no IPs in the project area. See Appendix H: Socio-demographic Characteristics of the People in the Project Areas and Appendix B the Screening Checklist for IPs.

G. Brief Socio-Economic and Demographic Profile of the Project Areas

31. The proposed additional roads with a total length of 79.29 k are located in 16 communes within 5 provinces (Tbong Khmum, Kampong Cham, Kampong Thom, Kampong Speu, and Kampong Chhnang). It will benefits a total of 166,797 population including 85,208 (or 51%) women, and with a total of 34,208 households (38,969 families)3 and of which 6,132 are women headed households. The project will also benefits around 2,423 poor households (ID poor 1) and 3,772 level 2 poor households (see Appendix H: Socio-demographic data of the project areas under the proposed additional roads located in 16 communes of 5 provinces.

32. Almost 98% primary sources of the households incomes are farming with additional sources of incomes derived from selling or business (vegetables, cooked foods, fish and meat, and various products for households’ daily needs or use. The farmers grow paddy rice, vegetables, root crops, and other crops. In some road sections in Tboung Khmum / Kampong Cham, there are rubber trees, black pepper, mangoes, and cassava grown. These all trees which

3 Commune Council Demographic data as of December 2019.

9

will not be affected by the proposed road improvement. The road will be a great help to the farmers to transport agricultural products, children would be able to travel faster and safer to go to school, as well as the local people when accessing to basic facilities such as health center/hospital, markets, working place, place of worship, and other areas. Besides that, the road will have less dusts during dry season which may aggravate the health condition of the children and elderly; unlike the roads condition during rainy season which is muddy and slippery, is risky for the lives of the road users especially those using bicycles and motorcycles.

33. The project will not cause adverse impacts for the local people including women and there is no cultural heritage, and forest that will be affected. During the civil works there will be minimal impacts that may arise from dust and noise but these are temporary disturbances, and will be mitigated under the EMP/CEMP. Overall, the project will provide long-term benefits for the local people. People expressed full support to the project 100% among consulted persons and are in favor of the project, and they would suggests to have the civil work starts as soon as possible.

34. Details of the observations and data gathered during the site visits and consultation meetings are shown in Appendices C and D. The registry of participants is shown in Appendix E.

CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

35. Information disclosure and consultation activities were carried out during the due diligence. Public information brochures or flyers were distributed to the commune leaders including project location maps prepared by the DDIS team were also shown to the commune leaders and community residents during the consultation meetings. Data were gathered through site visits, transect walk or ocular visit in the project areas, public consultation meetings, informal interview and focus group discussions, and public consultation held in the communes and villages. The focus group discussion was conducted following the guide questionnaire as shown in Appendix K.

36. The purpose of the consultation meetings and site visits is to inform the public (local people) about the proposed project (additional roads that will be improved), elicit their views and suggestions about their worries or concerns during the road construction, assess potential safeguards, social and gender related impacts that may arise during project implementation, and identify and or propose mitigation measures to avoid, mitigate or prevent potential safeguards and other social related impacts that may arise during project implementation.

37. The participants were asked about their perception on the project and how they will be benefited; potential safeguard impacts (environmental and social) that may arise during the construction period, either temporary or long-term and safeguards mitigation measures that will be implemented including job opportunities for local people (men and women, poor and other vulnerable groups) during the construction period.

38. A total of 14 public consultations had been conducted over 28 proposed roads at the commune/ village level in five provinces, participated by a total of 574 villagers, of which 193 (34%) are females. Consultation meetings in some road sections located adjacent to each other and located within the same commune or village, or in the same island with connecting roads had been combined or held in one venue. These include the consultation meetings in the following road sections: (a) TBK1, TBK1A, TBK2, and TBK3 located the same commune or village; (b) PI11, PI12, and PI13 are closed and located in an island; (c) MI1E and MI1F are closed and located in an island; (d) T1C, ST1D, ST1E, ST6, ST7, ST8, ST9, and ST10 are closed and located in an island; and (e) KCH13 and KCH13A are connected. Overall, 100% of the villages/ communes included in the 28 proposed roads for improvement were represented in the consultation meetings. Table 2 below shows the summary of the total number of participants during consultation meetings presented by road section, location (village, commune and province).

39. Duirng the consultation meetings, the participants were asked about their perception on the project and how they will be benefited; potential safeguard impacts (environmental and social) that may arise during the construction period, either temporary or long-term and safeguards mitigation measures that will be implemented including job opportunities for local

10

people (men and women, poor and other vulnerable groups) during the construction period. They were also informed about the proposed DED for the project, safeguard policy specifically on the IR related policy including objective and principles, importance of consultation and participation, cut-off date, entitlement matrix, GRM, and construction schedule. There was open forum in each consultation meeting to ensure that the participants will be able to raise questions and/ or clarify information.

Table 2: Summary of Total Number of Participants in Consultation Meetings for the RRIP II Additional Roads Proposed for Improvement

No Date and

Time

Road ID Venue

(Village, Commune & Province)

Sex-Disaggregated Number of Participants

Total

Female Male Total

1 16 Dec 2019

TBK8 Chanmoul Health center, Chanmoul commune Memut district TBK Province.

14 34 48

2 17 Dec 2019

TBK7 Rumchek commune Memut district Tboung Khmum district and province.

13 47 60

3 17 Dec 2019 TBK6 Thmor Dab village

Trapaing Pring commune dambae district TBK.

9 23 32

4 18 Dec 2019 TBK5 Beung Phtil Pagoda Toul

Sophy commun, O Raing Ov, TBK Province.

22 54 76

5 18 Dec 2019 TBK4 Thmor Pich1 village

Thmor Pich commune TBK district and Province.

15 13 28

6 19 Dec 2019

TBK1, TBK1A, TBK2, and TBK3

Commune office Peam Chilaing commune TBK district and Province.

6 16 22

7 19 Dec 2019 PI11, PI12, and PI13

Kaoh Pi commune Kroach Chmar district TBK province.

22 39 61

8 19 Dec 2019 SA5 Kaoh Samroung commune

Kampong Seam district Kampong Cham province.

14 22 36

9 20 Dec 2019

ST1C, ST1D, ST1E, ST6, ST7, ST8, ST9, and ST10

Wat Kandal, Kaoh Soutin Commune Kampong Cham province.

24 34 58

10 20 Dec 2019 MI1E and MI1F

Kaoh Mitt commune Kampong Cham Province.

2 23 25

11 24 Dec 2019 KSP-1FD

Taing Sya and Taing Samraong Commune, Phnom Srouch District, Kampong Speu Province

1 11 12

12 25 Dec 2019 KCH14

Krang Lvea village and commune, Samakki Mean Chey district Kampong Chhnang Province

14 12 26

11

13 25 Dec 2019 KCH13 and

KCH13A

Khna Chmar commune Samakki Mean Chey district Kampong Chhnang Province.

15 20 35

14 26 Dec 2019 KT5 Wat Ampil Trang Trea commune Stoung district Kampong Thom province.

22 33 55

Total: 14 (for 28 road sections) Total

193 (34%)

381 (66%

)

574 (100%)

40. No major concerns nor impacts were raised by the people during the consultation meetings. All are in favor of the project as it will provide them easier access when going to health center/ hospitals, they when transporting agricultural products from farm to market, and when buying goods from the markets to their villages for selling business by households in the villages/ communes; a great help to children when going to school, and work place. If the road is improved, it would be convenient for the people in going to pagoda for the Buddhists or mosques for the Cham, and other places. During consultation meetings, the local people mentioned that they have been waiting to have a DBST or concrete road for more than 30 years. See Appendix I for the summary table of the Question and Answers, and other information discussed and/ or raised during the consultation meetings held in December 2019.

41. The existing rural roads are made of laterite and is very dusty during dry season and muddy during wet season. It is very difficult for the farmers and households whose primary source of income is selling to transport goods and agricultural products because some road sections are flooded, very muddy and not accessible during heavy rains. Having improved roads is essential for the local people and will benefit all residents and those in adjacent areas (or villages located in interior areas or not along the main road but will have access through the roads that will be improved). Likewise, the road will be a great help to elderly, people with disabilities, sick people and pregnant women as they would have better access to health facilities, and other places. Overall, the participants have expressed that their household income will be improved after the road has been improved.

42. The people consulted are not worried on potential environmental impacts such as noise and dust during the construction period because they consider those as temporary in nature and could be mitigated. When asked if there will be local people including women interested to work in order to earn additional income, they replied yes because they need additional income after the planting and/ or harvest season. No social and gender related impacts were identified and raised by the people during the consultation meetings, and during the field visits by the project safeguards team.

43. The project has a resettlement framework (RF), gender action plan (GAP), EMP prepared that includes mitigation measures should there be problems or issues that may arise during project implementation. The GAP serves as guide to ensure effective gender mainstreaming, core labor standards will be complied with by the contractor. The EMP outlines the mitigation measures to ensure health and safety measures, and other measures and procedures to address complaints that may be raised by the local people during the construction phase.

GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

44. A grievance redress mechanism (GRM), consistent with the requirements of ADB SPS (2009) has been established since the time of the implementation of the ADB funded RRIP II projects. The new additional roads to be included in the project are located adjacent or link-up to existing roads rural roads which have already existing GRM. The commune leaders were already informed about the project, and they are aware of the GRM, how to keep records should there be complaints, and whom to contact in case there will be grievances that will not be resolved at the commune level. The GRM is an integral part of the monitoring and

12

information system. It aims to ensure that feedback is received, that the voices from the poor and marginalized groups are heard, and that the issues raised are resolved effectively and expeditiously.

45. The GRM will be accessible to diverse members of the community and stakeholders. Multiple types of media, including face-to-face meetings, written forms, telephone conversations, or e-mail, will be available for raising issues, concerns and grievances. The existing GRM and approach in managing complaints about local issues for the RRIP will be applied and/ or adopted in this project. Flyers/ PIB with information on the GRM, whom to contact should local people have complaints are included in the information material, which are also posted or displayed in the Commune Council’s Office. The commune chief explained to the local people about the project including the GRM process, to whom to contact should they have questions or complaints (as shown in the photographs below).

Figure 2: GR Information Brochure or flyer displayed at the commune council office and discussed during consultation meetings by the MRD SEO Officers

Public Information Brochure displayed or posted at the Commune Council’s Office by

the MR SEO Officers

Consultation meeting by the MRD SEO officers with the village and commune leaders (photo above was taken in Kaoh Pi, Tb Khmum).

Figure: Photograph of the brochure of flyer showing the GRM

and other information

Flyer or brochure showing the project’s GRM process and other relevant information.

46. The overall purpose of a Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) is to reduce risks for the project, offer communities an effective platform for expressing concerns, and achieving solutions to their concerns that will promote a constructive relationship between the people/local communities, project implementers including contractors, and other stakeholders. A GRM is

13

essential to ensure that the local people including women, project beneficiaries, affected persons, if any, and low-income households will have access to project benefits during implementation and operation stage in all project outputs/activities.

47. In this context, a project level grievance redress mechanism will be utilized which is already existing the GRM committee. The GRM committee is essential to allow appeals against any disagreeable decision, practice or activity arising from livelihood related or any other assets compensation. The people in the communities located within the project will be fully informed during the consultations of their rights and of the procedures for addressing grievances, both verbal and written. Any verbal grievance/complaint will need to be recorded and authenticated by a designated GRM official based on the existing GRM procedures (stated in the flyer/ brochure on GRM and other information relevant to the project).

48. Communities located along the road sections within the additional roads were already consulted, and community leaders as well. They are aware of the GRM process, and whom to consult as this has been discussed under RRIP II project, and reiterated during the consultation meetings in the communities identified for the additional roads. Care will be taken to prevent grievances rather than going through a redress process by ensuring active consultation with and participation of APs. If grievances still arise, all attempts will be made to resolve informally at the local village/commune level. All complaints will be recorded on a logbook that will be kept at the commune office and under the supervision of the commune chief, being the focal person for GRM at the commune level.

49. If issues are not resolved at the commune level, the next step is at the District level. Both the Commune and District levels of the GRC will have 15 days each upon receipt of a complaint to resolve it. Should there be grievances unresolved at the district level, these will be elevated to the Provincial level and will have 30 days. If not resolved or no satisfactory solution is found at any of these stages, following the requirement of ADB’s SPS, an aggrieved person is free to take the complaint to the Provincial Court and even higher court, which are not a part of the project level GRM, and whose decision would be final. However, according to the country’s legal provisions, an aggrieved person can approach a court of law only when the decision of the third step (Provincial Level) is unsatisfactory. The GRM levels are illustrated in the flow chart below (see Figure 4) and Appendix J presents the GRM logbook complaints form.

Figure 4: Grievance Redress Mechanism Procedural Steps

Step – 1 Commune Level

People affected by RRIPIII due to its construction or other related activities may file a complaint with the Commune Office orally or in writing. The commune office has 15 days to resolve the complaint.

If the District Office cannot resolve the complaint within 15 days or the aggrieved person is not satisfied with the decision, s/he can submit a complaint to the Provincial Office. The Provincial Level has 30 days to resolve the complaint.

Resolved

Not Resolved

Resolved

Resolved

Not Resolved

Step – 2 District Level

If the Commune Office cannot resolve the complaint or issue within 15 days or the aggrieved person is not satisfied with the decision, s/he can submit a complaint to the District Office, which has 15 days to resolve it.

Not Resolved

Step – 3 Provincial Level

COUNTRY’S LEGAL SYSTEM

14

INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

50. The Ministry of Rural Development (MRD) is the executing agency for the project and at the provincial level, the Provincial Department of Rural Department (PDRD) in each of the ten project provinces will be the contact points.

51. The project will be implemented by the MRD under the overall guidance of the Project Director of the Project Management Unit (PMU) and assisted by the Project Manager. A DDIS (Detailed Design) Team (the consultant) will assist the PMU in administering all project activities, design, monitoring and supervision during the entire period of civil works and other related activities. The DDIS consultant will be based in Phnom Penh, headed by the Project Team Leader; and, resident engineers and team will be based at the construction sites/provinces.

H. Project Management Unit (PMU

52. A dedicated Project Management Unit (PMU) has been established in the MRD for the RRIP to carry out the day to day tasks in the overall implementation of the project. The SEO officers will be responsible for ensuring that all safeguard requirements will be implemented by the contractor/ project implementers guided by the ADB SPS policy 2009. The SEIO has been established in 2012 by the MRD when the RRIP was implemented. The SEO officers were provided capacity building by ADB, DDIS consultants on specific areas related to environmental safeguards, social safeguards involuntary resettlement), and other social and gender related topics.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

53. IR Classification for all proposed road section. The IR classification for all proposed road section is category C as per ADB SPS 2009. The proposed additional roads for improvement will not require LA and no adverse impacts identified during this due diligence.

54. IR impacts and impact on income/livelihood. No impacts on livelihoods and other assets of the people living along the project road alignment has been identified as the improvement will be done on the existing roads. Temporary disturbance, dust and noise that might be experienced by the community residents in the project area will be mitigated guided by the RF, EMP/ CMP prepared for the proposed project.

55. Consultation, information disclosures and GRM. Information disclosures about the proposed project, project impacts and mitigation measures have been done through consultation meetings with the community residents, community leaders, and other stakeholders in the areas located along the project road alignment (additional roads). Public information material with the GRM procedures and contact details whom to contact should there be grievances related to the project has been distributed during consultation meetings. Flyers on GRM were distributed to commune leaders and are posted at the Commune Council office. Likewise, village and commune leaders disseminate the information to the residents through meetings. GRM Committee has been set up and existing in the project area and the community residents were already informed.

56. Registration and recording of complaints. A GRM logbook, commplaints form has been prepared (see Appendix J) should there be complaints that will be raised by the people relevant to the proposed project.

57. Monitoring and reporting during implementation. The MRD SEO assisted by the PIC will conduct regular monitoring at the site, consultation with the community residents, contractors and workers, and other stakeholders during project implementation. Follow-up consultation meetings with the community residents will be conducted prior to start of civil works. Monthly consultation meetings or more frequent meetings, if required, will be conducted with the

15

contractors during project implementation. Monthly and quarterly progress reports about the project will be prepared and submitted to ADB; and semi-annual social safeguards monitoring report will be prepared and submitted to ADB.

58. Measures to be taken if there are IR impacts during civil works construction. Prior to civil works, social safeguard assessment will be conducted, and public consultation meetings with the community residents. The contractors will be provided orientation on the ADB SPS 2009, RF, EMP/ CEMP, GAP to ensure that they are aware and know how to avoid, mitigate and or prevent LAR impacts. Should there be IR impacts that may arise during civil works construction, detailed assessment will be conducted including inventory of losses, and an RP will be prepared, if necessary.

59. Mitigation measures are discussed in the RF and EMP/ CEMP, and GAP has been prepared in the RRIP II project which includes the following (i) conduct public consultation meetings with the community leaders and residents in areas located along the road alignment for the additional roads, copies of the GRM flyers will be distributed and posted on the commune council’s office; (ii) capacity building/ training on safeguards will be carried out for the project implementers including contractors by the PMU/SEO assisted by the DDIS project team during project implementation; (iii) commune council leaders headed by the commune chiefs will be re-oriented on the GRM including recording of complaints, and actions taken, and communicating in a timely manner the action taken to the complainant; (iv) SEO and DDIS team will monitor contractors’ compliance of safeguards as stated in the EMP/ CEMP, and aligned with ADB SPS 2009 and how to avoid or mitigate impacts during the construction stage; details on this are discussed in the RF approved in the project (RRIP II); (v) discussed issues and concerns during regular monthly meetings; (vi) regular monitoring and reporting will be done which will be included in the semi-annual social monitoring report; monthly progress meetings with the contractor will be conducted by the MRD/DDIS/ SEO; and regular monitoring by the SEO team at the project sites; and (vii) providing guidance to contractors on safeguard measures. Assessment of impacts will be done during the construction stage, and guidelines as stated in the RF and in compliance with the ADB SPS 2009 will serve as guide for project implementers including contractors.

16

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Involuntary Resettlement Impact Categorization Checklist Appendix B: Indigenous Peoples Impacts Screening Categorization Checklist Appendix C: Consultation Meetings in the Project Area Held in Dec 2019 Appendix D: Minutes of Consultation Meetings in the Mekong Islands Held on 31 Dec 2019 Appendix E: Attendance Sheets Appendix F: Summary of Additional Roads in RRIP II Appendix G: Location Map of Additional Roads in RRIP II Appendix H: Socio-Demographic Data in the Additional Roads in RRIP II by Commune, District and Province. Appendix I: Summary of Question and Answers/ Minutes of the Consultation Meetings Appendix J: GRM Logbook/ Complaints Forms Appendix K: Focus Group Discussion-Consultation Guide Questionnaire

1

APPENDIX A: INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACT CATEGORIZATION CHECKLIST

Project: RRIP II Additional Roads Subproject: Additional Roads (Overall Assessment) Category: C

Probable Involuntary Resettlement Effects YES NO NOT

KNOWN REMARKS

Involuntary Acquisition of Land

1. Will there be land acquisition? √ No land will be acquired

2. Is the site for land acquisition known? Not applicable. No land will be acquired

3. Is the ownership status and current usage of land to be acquired known?

Not applicable. No LA

4. Will easement be utilized within an existing ROW

√ Will improve existing road.

5. Will there be loss of shelter and residential land due to land acquisition?

√

6. Will there be loss of agricultural and other productive assets due to land acquisition

√

7. Will there be loss of crops, trees and fixed assets due to land acquisition

√

8. Will there be loss of business or enterprises due to land acquisition?

√

9. Will there be loss of income sources and means of livelihoods due to land acquisition?

√

Involuntary Restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas

10. Will people lose access to natural resources, communal facilities and services/

√

11. If land use is changed, will it have an adverse impact on social and economic activities

√

12. Will access to land and resources owned by the community or by the state be restricted

√

Information on Displaced Persons

Any estimates of the likely number of persons that will be displaced by the project? NO. YES. NOT APPLICABLE. If yes, approximately how many?

Are any poor, female-headed households, or vulnerable to poverty risks? NO. YES. NOT APPLICABLE.

Are any displaced persons from indigenous or ethnic minority groups? NO. YES. NOT APPLICABLE.

Prepared by: Ester M. Felix and Pen Thay Date: 31 December 2019 Int’l Safeguards Specialist; Nat’l Gender Specialist

1

APPENDIX B: INDIGENOUS PEOPLES (IPs) IMPACT SCREENING CATEGORIZATION CHECKLIST

Project: RRIP II Additional Roads Category: C

CONCERNS (please provide elaboration on the

Remarks column) YES NO

NOT KNOWN

Remarks

1. Are there socio-cultural groups present in or use the project area who may be considered as “tribes” (hill tribes, schedule tribes, tribal peoples, etc.),” minorities” (ethnic or national minorities), or “indigenous communities” in the project area?

√ There are Cham (Muslim) HHs living in some road sections but they will not be adversely affected by the project. The Cham people are not considered as IPs in Cambodia. This has been confirmed by MRD.

2. Are there national or local laws or policies as well as anthropological researchers/ studies that consider these groups present in or using the project area as belonging to “ethnic minorities”, scheduled tribes, tribal peoples, national minorities, or cultural communities?

√

3. Do such groups self-identify as being part of a distinct social and cultural group?

√

4. Do such groups maintain collective attachments to distinct habitats or ancestral territories and/ or to the natural resources in these habitats and territories?

√

5. Do such groups maintain cultural, economic, social and political institutions distinct from the dominant society and culture?

√

6. Do such groups speak a distinct language or dialect? √

7. Has such groups been historically, socially and economically marginalized, disempowered, excluded, and/or discriminated against?

√

8. Are such groups represented as “Indigenous Peoples” or as “ethnic minorities” or “scheduled tribes” or “tribal populations” in any formal decision-making bodies at the national or local levels?

√

9. Identification of Potential Impacts

10. Will the project directly or indirectly benefit or target indigenous peoples?

√

11. Will the project directly or indirectly affect indigenous Peoples’ traditional socio-cultural and belief practices? (e.g., child-rearing, health, education, arts, and governance)

√

12. Will the project affect the livelihood systems of Indigenous Peoples? (e.g., food production system, natural resource management, crafts and trade, employment status)

√

13. Will the project be in an area (land or territory) occupied, owned, or used by Indigenous Peoples, and/ or claimed as ancestral domain?

√

14. Identification of Special Requirements

15. Commercial development of the cultural resources and knowledge of Indigenous Peoples?

√

16. Physical displacement from traditional or customary lands? √

2

17. Commercial development of natural resources (such as minerals, hydrocarbons, forests, water, hunting or fishing grounds) within customary lands under use that would impact the livelihoods or the cultural, ceremonial, spiritual uses that define the identity and community of Indigenous Peoples?

√

18. Establishing legal recognition of rights to lands and territories that are traditionally owned or customarily owned, occupied or claimed by Indigenous Peoples?

√

19. Acquisition of lands that are traditionally owned or customarily used, occupied or claimed by Indigenous Peoples?

√

B. Anticipated Project Impacts on Indigenous Peoples - None (Not Applicable)

Project Component/ Activity/ Output

Anticipated Positive Effect Anticipated Negative Effect

1.

2.

3.

Note: The project team may attach additional information on the project, as necessary. Prepared by: Date: 31 December 2019 Ester Felix and Pen Thay Int’l Safeguards Specialist; and Nat’l Gender Specialist

1

APPENDIX C: MINUTES OF CONSULTATION MEETINGS

PICTURES, AND REGISTRY OF PARTICIPANTS DURING THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETINGS HELD ON

16 TO 20, AND 24 TO 26 DECEMBER 2019

A. ObjectiveS of the public consultation

- To inform the local communities and authorities on the proposed project, location, and activities plan to improve.

- To assess potential social safeguards impacts, social and gender issues that may arise during the project implementation through consultation, site visit, and observations.

- To elicit comments, issues and concerns, and suggestions relevant to the proposed projects.

B. Summary of Results or Feedbacks from Consultation Meetings

The social and environmental safeguards team such as: International Social Safeguards and Development Expert, National Social Development (Labor and Gender Specialist), and National Environmental Specialist conducted the public consultation meetings with local authorities and affected households on the proposed additional roads for improvement under RRIP II held on 16-20 and 24-26 December 2019. The consultation meetings were participated by the commune-village leaders and local residents, students, teachers, women, and other stakeholders.

1. Consultation Meetings for Tboung Khmum

No.

Date

Venue (Village,

Commune &

Province)

Key Issues and Recommendations Raised by the Participants

1 19 December 2019

TBK1, TBK1A, TBK2, and TBK3: in Peam Chilaing Commune, Tboung Khmum District, Tboung Thmum Province

- Some sections are made of earth roads, very difficult to travel in rainy season.

- This road is flooded during Mekong River Flood from August-September. So people proposed that the road be improved to concrete road.

- Almost all of the HHs/ people are farmers, most they plant rice, corn, tobacco, and fruit trees.

- No protected area and sensitive resources are located near the road project.

- A few fruit trees and structures are located on RoW, but for concrete road with the width 5-6m, these will not be affected (the road will improve existing road). No LAR issue.

- People strongly support the proposed road improvement project.

- The communities will not be affected by air and noise during construction activities, or is very small and temporary impacts.

- Commune leaders and villagers would like the project to commence soon.

2 18 December 2019

TBK4: in Thmar Pich Commune, Tboung Khmum District, Tboung Khmum Province

- The existing road sections are made of laterite and some earth road. during rainy season, very difficult to travel to school, hospital, and market.

- Most people are farmers, they plant rice, rubber, cashew, pepper. mango, and cassava.

- Most of road is passed farm fields and village gardens

- No school, pagoda, and sensitive receptors are located along the road side.

- The impacts of dust and noise on communities is very small

2

and short.

- DBST road is good for public safety because not dust and mud, and not slippery during rainy season.

- The impacts can be minor during construction (dust, muddy, and noise) and are temporary and no serious problem.

- Some people in our commune have already participated in road safety awareness, HIV awareness conducted by MRD and local health authorities.

- People suggested that proper (big) culverts be installed by the contractor for supporting water flow (run- off flood).

3 18 December 2019

TBK5: in Tuol Sophy Commune, Oraing Uv District, Tboung Khmum Province

- This road is laterite, needs repair and still in poor condition. During dry season, the road is very dusty and muddy in rainy season; and very difficult to travel for for livelihood activities; when going to school, hospital, and market and work place.

- People are very happy to hear that the road will be improve to DBST road.

- Most people are farmers, grow rice and farm crops.

- A few vegetation and shrubs are on RoW and in public land (community land).

- Local people strongly support the project.

- One school and pagoda are located along the road side.

- Will save time and travelling will be convenient if road is DBST (no mud/ dust).

- The impacts can be minor occurred during construction (dust, muddy, and noise) is temporary and no serious problems.

- This road improvement should be widened the same size for both road sides.

- People asked when the road will be constructed? They want the DBST road to be constructed soon.

4 17 December 2019

TBK6: in Rumchek and Trapaeng Pring Commune, Memot and Dambe District, Tboung Khmum Province

- This rural road has very poor condition. During dry season it very dusty and slippery / muddy during rainy season. Some parts of road, the water flows over the road (rainy water) during heavy rain.

- People are very happy to hear the project will be improved to DBST.

- Almost all of the HHs’ primary livelihood is farming. They grow rubber, cassava, pepper, cashew, mango, corn, and banana and other vegetables.

- There are some trees and vegetation along the road but may not be affected by the project.

- One school and one pagoda are located near the road.

- This road is important for local people to go: school, hospital, markets, and others business purposes.

- The DBST road is very good for safe traveling and for improving local economic activities.

- No protected areas and sensitive resources, located on the RoW.

- People strongly support the project. No land acquisition is required.

- Air pollution, noise, and dust is minimal and temporary only during construction.

- Generally, the impacts are minor, but the benefit from the project is greater and will have long-term positive impacts.

- No protected and conservation areas are located near the road project.

- People suggested that proper design of the culverts (big sites) to ensure proper water flow.

3

- Please inform us and stake out road alignment, if will affected on vegetation is not problem, we support and will cut or move out.

- This road improvement should be widened the same size for both road sides.

- Some local people (men and women) wants to work in civil works.

- The asked when the construction will commence.

- DBST roads will improve their livelihoods.

5 17 December 2019

TBK7: in Rumchak Commune, Memot District, Tboung Khmum Province

- We are very happy, if this road will be improved to DBST. Local people use this road to markets, to school, to health center/hospital, transport agricultural products to markets.

- The present rural road is made of laterite, in bad condition; dusty road during dry season and slippery muddy during heavy rains. Some parts of the road are temporary flooded by run-off.

- Very difficult to travel on this road when going to school, hospital, and markets.

- DBST road is very good for safe traveling and will help local HHs improve livelihoods and living condition.

- No school, pagoda, health center, and sensitive receptor are located on RoW or near roadway.

- There are no protected areas, sensitive forest resources, and structures located on the RoW.

- A few vegetation (rubber, pepper, and cashew trees) are located along the existing, but will not be affected. The people expressed that in case it will be affected during the construction, they will strongly support the project. They want a DBST road as it will have long-term benefits for the HHs/ local people.

- No land acquisition in the road section.

- Air pollution, noise, and dust is minimal and temporary only during construction. People will not complain of dust because for over 30 year, they are already get use to dust which is bad for their health. They prefer a DBST road to address the dust problem and muddy / slippery roads during rainy season, and some road sections are not accessible.

- No conservation forest and water conservation area are located near the road.

- During rainy season, water flows on some parts of road (flash flood). Need to design the appropriate culverts (big sites) for water flow and reduce temporary flow.

- Some local people wants to work, including women to earn additional income.

- They asked when construction will commence.

6 16 December 2019

TBK8: in Chan Moul Commune, Memot District, Tboung Khmum Province.

- We have been waiting for this project a long time. -We are very happy that the road will be improved (DBST road).

- A few rubber trees, mango, and shrubs are located along the road, may not be affected as the existing road is already wide. The project will improve the existing road.

- The Health Center and school are located along this road.

- Local people use this road when going basic facilities such as markets, schools, health center/hospital; markers; when transporting agricultural products local and international (Vietnam) market.

- This is one of the access roads going to the border of Vietnam. The road is not yet improved.

- The people are happy and support to this project 100%.

4

- The present rural road is very poor and difficult to access. Very dusty in dry season and slippery and muddy during rainy season.

- This road improvement project is important for local people to transport agricultural products, to markets (save time and money).

- The agricultural products and economic condition of the local people will be improved after the road has been improved.

- No LAR issue was seen or observed as the road is already wide.

- Air pollution, noise, and dust generation from project will be temporary affected only during construction, but problem

- No protected areas and forest resources located near the road project.

- Some parts of road is flooded by run-off, need to study the run-off and provide some proper culverts for reduce rainy water flows.

- Need the DBST road as soon as possible.

7 19 December 2019

PI11, PI12, and PI13: in Koh Pi Commune, Kroch Chmar District, Tboung Khmum Province.

- This is an existing road; very difficult to travel in raining season. This road floods, when big flood from Mekong Flood August-September. So we proposed improving to concrete road.

- Almost people are farmers, most they plant rice, corn, tobacco, bamboo, pomelo, and fruit trees.

- No protected area and sensitive resources are located near the road project.

- A few fruit trees and structures are located on RoW, but for concrete road with the width 5-6m will not affect these properties. No LAR issue has been identified.

- People are highly in favor of the project.

- We need to improve the earth road to concrete road in Koh Pi for our people to go school, market, transport products, safety travel, and increasing price of agricultural products in this Island.

- The communities are not concerned with air and noise impact during construction stage, as these are only minor and temporary.

- They asked: A few road sections are curving; can the project improve to straight road for local safety traffic? And when the project will starts?,

- TBK1, TBK1A, TBK2, and TBK3: Consultation meeting in Peam Chilaing, Tboung Khmum District

5

The existing condition of roads in Peam Chilaing and consultation meeting in Peam Chilaing

Commune.

- TBK4: Consultation Meeting in Thmar Pich Commune, Tboung Khmum District

The existing condition of road TBK-4 and consultation meeting in Thmar Pich Commune

for TBK4

- TBK5: Consultation Meeting in Tuol Sophy Commune, Oraing Ov District

The existing road condition, TBK5

Consultation in Tuol Sophy Commune for TBK5

6

- TBK6: Consultation Meeting in Rumchek, Memot District

Consultation in Rumchak and Trapaeng Pring Commune for TBK6

The existing environmental resources are on the road TBK6

- TBK7: Consultation in Rumvhek Commune, Memot District

Consultation meeting in Rumchak Commune

- TBK8: Consultation Meeting in Chan Moul Commune, Memot District

7

Consultation activities for TBK8 in health center of Chan Moul Commune

The existing condition of environmental and social resources are on the roadway

- PI11, PI12, and PI13: Consultation Meeting in Koh Pi Commune, Kroch Chmar District

The existing condition of roads PI-11, PI-12, and PI-13 and consultation in Koh Pi Commune

2. Consultation Meetings for Kampong Cham

No.

Date

Venue (Village,

Commune &

Province)


1 19 December 2019

SA5: in Koh Samraong Commune, Kampong Siem District, Kampong Cham Province.

- This is located in the Mekong River islands. The existing road in Koh Samraong Island is earth road, very difficult to travel during rainy season. So they proposed for concrete road.

- All the people in the island are farmers, they plant rice, corn, tobacco, vegetation, kapok tress, and fruit trees.

- The road condition and existing environmental and social resources are the same as in the Mekong Islands (Koh Pi and Koh Sotin).

- Not protected area and fishery conservation site near the project.

- This proposed road is connected to concrete road of RRIP-II and accessed in the village area.

- Some trees and structures are located on RoW, but will not be affected by the road project, because existing road width

8

is about 5-6m.

- The impacts of air, duct, and noise from construction activities are very small, the community is not much considered, they are happy with new road.

- They asked, when this road will construct?

- Some people in this commune have attended in HIV and road safety awareness organized by MRD.

2 20 December 2019

MI1E and MI1F: in Koh Mitt Commune, Kampong Siem District, Kampong Cham Province.

- This existing road is earth road is very difficult to travel in raining season.

- The road condition and existing environmental and social are the same as in the Koh Soutin.

- The road will improve to concrete road. Some sections of roads are flooded during August-September.

- There are not protected area and fishery conservation site near the project area.


- A few trees and vegetation or shrubs are located on RoW. But for construction concrete road with width: 5-6m, these will not be affected.

- Our people are happy and will support and cooperate with the road projects

- The impacts of air, dust, and noise from construction activities are very small, and temporary the community is not much considered.

- Some people in this commune attended in MRD HIV and road traffic awareness.

3 20 December 2019

ST1C, ST1D, ST1E, ST6, ST7, ST8, ST9, and ST10: in Koh Soutin Commune, Kampong Siem District, Kampong Cham Province

- This Island in located on the Mekong River. The existing road is earth road is very difficult to travel in rainy season. The road condition and existing environmental and social resources are similar in the Koh Samraong.

- The road will improve to concrete road. Some sections of roads are flooded during August-September.

- All the people in island are farmers, they plant rice, corn, tobacco, vegetation, bamboo, kapok tress, and fruit trees.

- There are not protected area and fishery conservation site near the project.


- No LAR issue.

- The impacts of air, duct, and noise from construction activities are minor only in construction stage, the community is not much considered. They are happy with new road.

- Some people are concerned to traffic issues after construction.

- Some people attended in HIV and road traffic awareness, organized by MRD.

9

- SA5: in Koh Samraong Commune, Kampong Siem District

The existing condition of road SA-5 and consultation in Koh Samraong Commune

- Roads MI1E and MI1F: Consultation in Koh Mitt Commune, Kampong Siem District

The existing condition of roads in Koh Mitt and consultation meeting in Koh Mitt Commune

- Road ST1C, ST1D, ST1E, ST6, ST7, ST8, ST9, and ST10: Consultation in Koh Soutin Commune, Kampong Siem District

10

The existing condition of roads in Koh Soutin and consultation meeting in Koh Soutin Commune

3. Consultation Meetings for Kampong Thom

No.

Date

Venue (Village,

Commune &

Province)


1 26 December 2019

KT5: in Trea and Banteay Stung Commune, Stung District, Kampong Thom Province

- The road is connected from National road 5 to road RRIP-2. This existing road is laterite, very dusty in dry season and muddy in rainy season.

- Almost all of the HHs’ primary source of income is farming; they grow rice and other crops.

- This road will be improved to DBST. The existing road width is large.

- No LAR issues, existing road is wide.

- A few shrubs are on the RoW (public community land), will not be affected by road project.

- The impacts of air, dust, and noise from road construction is minimal and temporary during construction stage.

- They asked when the road construction will commence.

- They had been waiting for the DBST road for over 30 years, some people said for more than 50 years. They are very happy to hear that the road will be DBST. They want the construction to commence soon.

- Local people including women would like to work, participate in HIV and human trafficking prevention, road safety awareness and other training.

- TK5: Consultation Meeting in Trea Commune, Stung District

Existing road condition in Kampong Thom. Very wide, No LAR issue.

11

Consultation meeting with the villagers and commune/ village leaders; and women in KT5 and consultation meeting in Trea Commune.

4. Consultation Meetings for Kampong Speu

No.

Date

Venue (Village,

Commune &

Province)


1 24 December 2019

KSP-1FD: In Taing Sya and Taing Samraong Commune, Phnom Srouch District, Kampong Speu Province

- The road section is under the RRIP-2, But this section and bridge is damaged by flood in 2018 in 2.70 km, so now this road will improve to DBST road same as RRIP-2

- A pagoda is near this road section and no affected to trees and vegetation, because project will follow to old (RRIP-2) alignment

- The connection this road is very important and need for local people to transport products, to school, hospital, markets, and to work in garment factories.

- During road damaged, the people travel other road, is far and spend more time.

- The impacts of air, noise, and duct during construction is minor and temporary only during construction this section, it is not significant.

12

- KSP-1FD: Consultation in Tang Sya and Tang Samraong Commune, Khnom Srouch District

The existig condition of road KSP-1FD and consultation in Taing Sya Commune

5. Consultation Meetings for Kampong Chhnang

No.

Date

Venue (Village,

Commune &

Province)


1 25 December 2019

KCH14: in Kraing Lvea Commune, Sameakki Meanchey District, Kampong Chhnang Province

- Is short road and connected from RRIP2 and RRIP-AF to village area.

- The road will improve to DBST road,

- All people in the commune are farmers. some young people work in garment factories

- The improving this road section is very important for our people go to school, hospital, market, transporting products, and to work for garment factories.

- The impacts of air, noise, and duct during construction is minor or temporary impacts only during construction this section, it is not significant.

- some local communities are attended trainings or awareness that organized by local NGOs, MRD and MoH: climate change, sanitation, HIV, and road traffic safety.

2 25 December 2019

KCH13 and KCH13A: in Khna Chhmar and Chrey Kaong Commune, Sameakki Meanchey District, Kampong Chhnang Province

- Most of the road is passed rice field with irrigation canals, and residential area with village gardens. The road will improve to DBST road.

- All people in the commune are farmers. Some young people work in garment factories

- The improving this road section is very important for our people go to school, hospital, market, transporting products, and to work for garment factories.

- The impacts of air, noise, and duct during construction is minor and temporary only during construction, it is not significant.

- Some local communities are attended trainings or awareness that organized by local NGOs, MRD and MoH:

13

climate change, sanitation, HIV, road traffic safety, and mother’s health.

- KCH14: Consultation in Kraing Lvea Commune, Samaki Meanchey District

The existing condition of road KCH-14 and consultation meeting in Kraing Lvea Commune

- Roads KCH13 and KCH13A: Consultation in Khna Chmar Commune, Sameakki Meanchey District.

The existing condition of roads and consultation meeting in Khna Chhmar Commune

14

C. Registry of Participants

The participants were invited from some villages of communes are located along the proposed rural roads of RRIP-2-Additional Roads such as: commune chiefs, commune councils, village chiefs, and representative of some local people are presented in tables below:

1. Consultation Meeting in Tboung Khmum

- Attended List of Meeting in Peam Chilaing Commune, Tboung Khmum District No Name Sex Village-Commune Function Phone

1 Houy Leang Hout

M Peam Chilaing Chief Commune 012 442 626

2 Cheam Eng Hort

M - Deputy commune chief

012 991 456

3 Chheng Sophal M - Commune council

4 Chap Engkhim M - Village chief 017 970 279

5 Phon Phean M - Villager

6 Van Bothen F - -

7 Try Sangna F - -

8 Try Champa F - -

9 Nao Sarum M - -

10 Kry Sath M - -

11 Chhun Houy M -

12 Meas Yorn M - -

13 Seng Soklim F - -

14 LachPeng Sreang

M - -

15 San Sang Onn M - Deputy village chief 012 538 178

16 Vin Song Born M - Villager 097 867 625

17 Min Bunthach F - School Teacher 092 513 393

18 Sour Horng M - Villager

19 ChhunBun Khung

F - -

20 Pen Vanna M - -

- Attended List of Meeting in Thmar Pich Commune, Tboung Khmum District (TBK4)

No Name Sex Village-Commune Function Phone

1 Yong Visai M Thmar Pich Commune Deputy village chief

2 Yun Chhouk F - Villager

3 Pouk Saing Leng

F - -

4 Onn Pouk F - -

5 Chae Sophal M - -

6 Sroun Poa F - -

7 Em Chhoun M - -

8 San Onn F - -

9 Var Onn F - -

10 Born Seang F - -

11 Chhum Kret M - -

12 Than Touch F - -

13 Say Sarum F - -

14 Sun Nach F - -

15 That Ngor F - -

16 Loun Eng M - -

17 Hun Chan F - -

18 Khloth Srey F - -

19 Am Chhey Hag F - -

20 Bou Samy F - -

21 Chhem Chrip F - -

22 Chhum Sarum M Thmar Pich Commune Commune Council

23 Kong Kunthy M - Commune Council

15

24 Tim Deth M - Commune Council

25 Anth Hong M - Villager

26 Cheth Cheat M - -

- Attended List of Meeting in Tuol Sophy Commune, Oraing Ov District (TBK5)


1 Chhon Sang On F Tuol Sophy Commune

Villager

2 To Neang F - -

3 Thol Thoun M - -

4 Chey Reun M - -

5 Var Srey F - -

6 Sreng Sret M - -

7 Chhay Map M - -

8 Hol Sopheap F - -

9 Pen Siloun F - -

10 Yan Srang F - -

11 Soun Chanseng F - -

12 Sen Savy F - -

13 Sen Sreang M - -

14 Sroun Sam On M - -

15 Sorn Reth M - -

16 Leng Kim M - -

17 Chhorn Sokha F - -

18 Kheat Ky F - -

19 Tit Phal M - -

20 Ith Soung M - -

21 Sem Souy M - -

22 Phalla F - -

23 Souy Chhean F - -

24 Ith Phan F - -

25 Sean Sony F -

26 Hout Hun F -

27 Seng Kheun M -

28 Nos Theun M -

29 Hag Han M -

30 Kong Chamreun M Tuol Sophy Deputy commune chief

31 Chan Bo M - Commune Council

32 Louch Leang M - Villager

33 Chan Thy M - -

34 Meas Mon M - -

35 Nov Nim M - -

36 Neth Nam M - -

37 Von Vuth M - -

38 Teuk Sean M - -

39 Han Sak M - -

40 Vath Maly F - -

41 Tol Srey San F - -

42 Kong Sinat F - -

43 Nos Buntheun M

44 Yem Yat M

45 Phy Chhi M

46 Ning Chea M

47 Kan Kheng M

48 Kun Tim M

49 Youk Vudy M

50 Tep Chhorn M

51 Chhai Lim M

52 Yout Thy M

53 Dan Houn M

16

54 Chheng Phalla M

55 Krouch Samel M

56 Kung Sophath M

57 Srang Kheng M

58 Ngip Phal M

59 Khun Kheun M Tuol Sophy Village chief 088 144 2466

60 Tep Sao M - Villager 088 251 0306

61 Ou Sarum M - Village member

62 Ly Rotha M - Village member

63 Yeun Votha M - Village Chief 097 604 8548

64 Yat Tho M - Commune Council

- Attended List of Meeting in Rumchek and Trapaeng Pring Commune, Memut District (TBK6)


1 Sok Narith F Rumchek commune Commune Chief

2 Kun Kimsin M - Deputy commune chief

3 Sorn San M Thmar Dap, Rumchek

Village Chief

4 Kheng Eng M - Villager

5 Koa Kan M - -

6 No Sok Hen M - -

7 Loun Chheang M - -

8 Mon Pheoun M - -

9 Yom Keat F - -

10 Thon Thol M - -

11 Theoun Sokha M - -

12 Meoun Saman F - -

13 Than Pan F - -

14 Ngoun Kou F - -

15 Him Hun F - -

16 Chhum Krep F - -

17 Man Sarin M Trapaeng Pring Commune

Village Chief

18 Hap Chan M

19 Kheng Mon M

20 Chae On M

21 Chhin Sarin M

22 Orm Thuy M

23 Thorng Thouch F

24 Vin Van M

25 San Hang M

26 Sem Lorn M

27 Ma Man M

28 Theap Theoun M

29 Yann Veoun M

30 Khmuy Veoun M

31 Man Teas M

32 Yeoun Yeang F

- Attended List of Meeting in Rumchek Commune, Memut District (TBK7)


1 Sok Narith F Rumchek Commune

Commune Chief


3 San Sareun M - Village chief

17

4 Long Sokha M - Villager

5 Chhum Kheang M - -

6 Hen Keoun M - -

7 Ham Thy M - -

8 Chhun Channeun

M - -

9 Nges Hor M - -

10 Keo Heun M - -

11 Seoun Phan M - -

12 Klork Deth M - -

13 Chhim Kheoun F - -

14 Khoun Savy F - -

15 Keo Khet F - -

16 Meoung Sineth F - -

17 Reth Neth F - -

18 Sim Sareoun F - -

19 Chreun San F - -

20 Ly Vanset M - Village Chief

21 Ly Gour F - Deputy village chief

22 Ouk Pleu M - Group leader

23 Yep Anth M -

24 Eal Mouslim M - School Teacher

25 Yem Kao M -

26 Soth Him M -

27 Math Man M -

28 Math Dollas M -

29 San Las M -

30 Hak Yousos F -

31 Nou Sleas F -

32 Chip Anth M -

33 Math Soran M -

34 Mao Vanny F -

35 Krem You M -

36 Ear Lim M -

37 Kao Sma Eal M

38 Sen Him M

39 Sos Saran M

40 Sos Vy F

41 Nao Naseak F

42 Yup Yar F

43 Run Sly Man M

44 Eal Sles M

45 Him Yousos M

46 Man Limrun M

47 Sles Eal F

48 Sony Imrun M

49 Eal Thyes F

50 Mao Maravy F

51 Ya Sares F

52 Math Salas M

53 Him Kriya M

54 Sos Eal M

55 Sman Hout M

56 Lu Notin M

57 Roun Youn M

58 San Sai Yop M

59 Las Say Man M

- Attended List of Meeting in Chan Moul Commune, Memut District (TBK8)


1 Mea Sarum M Chan Moul Commune chief 097 767 2736

18

commune

2 Prak Kakada F - Deputy commune chief

088 854 3768

3 Kong Soth M - Deputy commune chief

4 Prum Son M - Commune Council

5 Tep Sarun M - -

6 Veoun Sareth F - Commune Assistant

097 561 4517

7 Bour Chheang

M - Village chief

8 Bin Ngor M - Deputy village chief

9 San Ron M - Villager

10 NGork Sok M - -

11 Real Ngeur F - -

12 In Yim F - -

13 Khat Yan F - -

14 Rath Siyeun F - -

15 San Saray F - -

16 Long Sophal F - -

17 Ouch Sayeun F - -

18 Lim Phal M - -

19 Ngor Ngean M - -

20 Rous Reth M - -

21 Eoun Seoun F - -

22 Yeth Chantrea

M - -

23 Sun Tep M - -

24 Keo Chhreng M - Village chief

25 Oun Chon M - Deputy village chief

26 Seuk Sveat M - Villager

27 Thlok Thon M - -

28 Yeun Veun M - -

29 Seuk Seak M - -

30 Koch Thong M - -

31 Tit Soun M - -

32 Sorn Seung M - -

33 Soun Ny F - -

34 Ky Ny M - -

35 Kun Neun M - -

36 Neang Han M - -

37 Hun Run M - -

38 Sem Pav M - -

39 Sok Vor M - -

40 Nou Chhoun M - -

41 Run Sinath F - -

42 Nut Sarin F - -

43 Tep Ren M - -

44 Run Bunny M - -

45 Ngout Tot M - -

46 Ban Samol M - -

- Attended List of Meeting in Koh Pi Commune, Kroch Chmar District (PI11, PI12, PI13)


1 Khov Our M Koh Pi Commune chief 011 953 225

2 Long Sok M - Deputy commune chief

012 632 101

3 Ek Thon M - Deputy commune 097 634

19

chief 1507

4 Soum Vibol M - Commune council 088 862 3001

5 Koy Sok M - Village chief 088 439 3665

6 Ear Meng Srey M - Villager

7 Lay Chheng Try M - -

8 Kim Lov M - -

9 Ann Oun M - -

10 Hang Heng M - -

11 Chhrey Si Eang F - -

12 Heng Son F - -

13 Luy Kim Sang M - -

14 Noy Hang M - -

15 Tou Ang Heng M - -

16 Mon Sok Meng M - -

17 Chrek Sreng M - -

18 Seng Nai Ann F - -

19 Lot Eng Kim F - -

20 Mich Chhen F - -

21 Mich Chreounk F - -

22 Chhun Hai M - Village chief 088 439 3314

23 Chhi Suy Ang F - Villager

24 Keat Kan M - -

25 Mean Mao M - -

26 Khou Sam Leng M - -

27 Khim No M - -

28 Chhean Sokhom M - -

29 Houy Chamreoun M - -

30 Hak Lang M - -

31 Keo Kim Horn M - -

32 Thong Yeung F - -

33 Bek Chheng Hag F - -

34 OunChhengNang F - -

35 KayChheng Ngun

M - -

36 Mao Chheng Or F - -

37 Loug Meng Houn M - -

38 Bren Kouch F - - 39 Ann Eth M - Village Chief 092 874

639

40 Chheng Neang F - Villager

41 Than Mom F

42 Chhun Sang F

43 Horng Heak F

44 Vann Chan F

45 Bun Hory M

46 Hanh Nesy F

47 Outh Sambat F

48 Tha Sok Leang F

49 Broch Yeat M

50 Va Chheng Srun M

51 San Tong M

52 Brech Tho M

53 Kim Leng M

54 Loy Thol M

55 Me Ang M

56 Pheng Sokheng F

57 Nong SoKear F

58 Lak Hum Leng M

59 Ork Chheng F

20

2. Consultation Meeting in Kampong Cham

- Attended List of Meeting in Koh Samraong Commune, Kampong Siem District (SA5)


1 San Sok M Koh Samraong Commune Chief 097 725 8428

2 Tit Vanak F - Deputy commune chief

3 Dy Kouch M - Villager

4 Ham Sang Keng M

5 Phay Chea M

6 Chhay Yet F

7 Sin Cheav M

8 Pouv Im F

9 Hak Sokchea F

10 Ham Kang M

11 Se Sok Nao M

12 Tho Meth M

13 Sous Sy F

14 Toun Heng F

15 Mom Prum M

16 Ngouv Hang F

17 Yean Sinat F

18 Lim Mao F

19 Sok Chheng Hat M

20 Ouk Lang M

21 Souk Sunheng M

22 Kung Kim M

23 Onn Chhai Leang

F

24 Chhun Run M

25 Hak Sokchea M

26 Sin Chhea M

27 Born Bunheng M

28 Chhor Roun F

29 Ngoun Nat F

30 Chhiv Chhunlay M

31 Meung Ky M

32 Hem Sarun M

33 Thant Molika F

34 Chan Neth F

- Attended List of Meeting in Koh Mith Commune, Kampong Siem District (MI1E, MI1F)


1 Meth Song Heng

M Koh Mith Commune

Village Chief 011 800 939

2 Nhip Sokheng M - Villager

3 Chhi Pum M -

4 Hak Lim Ngon M -

5 Lim Sivath M -

6 Chang Mork M -

7 Moung Tesour M -

8 Tim Sareun M -

9 Boung Reth M - Deputy village chief

10 Long Kimhorn M - Villager 088 799 0009

11 Sar Chea M - -

12 Eam Thon M - -

13 Heng Seng Heng

M - -

21

14 Cheng Srun M - -

15 Rouch Marun F - -

16 Chhun Leng M - -

17 Khin Sokun F - -

18 Peng Chhunleng

M - -

19 Ven Neang M - Commune Chief 012 981 426

20 Ouk Than M - Deputy commune chief

011 602 030

21 Mao Ourk M - Deputy commune chief

097 707 0757

22 Sun Heng Srouch

M - -

23 Top Phat M

- Attended List of Meeting in Koh Sotin Commune, Kampong Siem District (roads in Koh Soutin)


1 Tak Naisim F Village 3, Koh Sotin Villager

2 Kang Leap F - -

3 Rim Mai F - -

4 Soy Sineng F - -

5 Sngoun Heng M - -

6 Pork Heong M - -

7 Kang Kimlang F - -

8 Leung Sophealy F - -

9 Houy Kimhan M - -

10 Ann Narong M - -

11 Kao Sithan F - -

12 Mao Dem F - -

13 Eath Sreang M - -

14 Sun Meth M - -

15 Soung Sam On F - -

16 Nong Nean F - -

17 Yout Reth M - -

18 Mok Leang M - -

19 Yon Chantha M - -

20 Ear Khen M - -

21 Srey Noup F - -

22 Kung Sun M - -

23 Phut Min M - -

24 John Phat M - -

25 Be Sareun F - -

26 Yout Ky F - -

27 Kruy Seng Teang

F - -

28 Peng Heng F - -

29 Yout Chan M - -

30 Chea Sreung M - -

31 Phang Heng F - -

32 Chheang Chea M - -

33 Kheiv Sam M - -

34 Oum Vanna M - -

35 Khat Sa Eam M Village 10, Koh Sotin Village Chief

36 Som Many M - Deputy village chief 092 841 492

37 Prak Ban M - Village member

38 Krouch Thy M - -

39 Ean Phal M - -

40 Hong Hen M - -

41 Khat Rin M - -

42 Khouy Chhouk M - -

22

43 Ouk Paov M

44 Lim Kimhout M

45 Leng Reth M

46 Phat Phea M

47 Han Kimhean F

48 Phung Chanthol F

49 Leng Chantha F

50 Eng Nim F

51 Sok Chhean M

52 Mout Chany F

53 San Mom F

54 Van Leav F

55 Han Lang Meng F

56 Yem Ouk M

3. Consultation Meeting in Kampong Thom

- Attended List of Meeting in Trea and Bantey Stung Commune, Stung District (KT5)


1 Kan Seoun M Trea Commune Deputy commune chief

092 534 057

2 Chhing Leang M - Deputy commune chief

092 886 249

3 On Ouy M - Commune Council 076 777 9151

4 Chheam Chhort M Commune Council

5 Yin Kun M Villager

6 Chorn Born M -

7 Yan Khom M Village Chief 012 176 1281

8 Lao Rous M Deputy village chief 097 485 1791

9 Sorth Reth F Villager

10 Say Choy M Village Chief 092 247 231

11 Yan Khom M

12 Lao Rous M

13 Sorth Reth F

14 Yin Kun M Commune Council

15 Oum Dan M Villager

16 Tim Van F -

17 Chea Vy F -

18 Ann Hai F -

19 Heoun Than M -

20 Horn Hon M -

21 Lu Vy F -

22 In That F -

23 Chhun Khe M -

24 Sim Yout M -

25 Yann Reun F -

26 Van Sok F -

27 Hav Pheap F

28 Phat Phon M

29 Yim Yeth M

30 Long Ran F

31 Ny Kaom F

32 Yim Meth F

33 Chhorn Your F Banteay Stung Commune council

34 Chea Thy M - Commune Assistant 017 405 349

35 Yous Sareth M - Village chief 092 690 348

36 Tom Thet M

37 Pan Chheun M

23

38 Yong Ya M

39 Chhoun Thoun M

40 Sin Mao F

41 He Sim F

42 Yun Chhoy F

43 Chea Thin M

44 Phan Mey M

45 Hang Lorn M

46 Yem Yip M

47 Suth Ser M

48 Mouy Sok F

49 Thin Vy F

50 Norn Keur F

51 Chheng Tom F

4. Consultation Meeting in Kampong Speu

- Attended List of Meeting in Tang Samraong and Tang Sya Commune, Phnom Srouch District (KSP-1FD)


1 Ouk Klean M Tang Samraong Commune Council 096 712 9696

2 Mouk Buny M - Commune security

3 Kn Van M - Deputy village chief 096 562 1919

4 Neum Vin M - Villager

5 Mao Thim M - -

6 Heang Solin M - -

7 Hay Hun M - -

8 Yim Sann M - -

9 Bo Sareun M - -

10 Khiev Heng M - -

11 Meas Sokhan F Tang Sya Commune Villager

12 Touch Binheng M - -

5. Consultation Meeting in Kampong Chnang

- Attended List of Meeting in Kraing Lvear Commune, Samaki Meanchey District (KCH14)


1 Khlaing Ry M Kraing Lvear Commune Chief 089 770 438

2 Hak Bunny M - Villager

3 Ouk Sareun M

4 Deap Deum M

5 Kit Sokra F -

6 Mai Treung M

7 Bou Yeak Heak M

8 Puth Onn M

9 Hung Mao F

10 Phan Sarum F

11 Mai Kimhou M

12 Tan Vibol M

13 Sok Saovy F

14 Lim Phanna F

15 Chean Sopheang

F

16 Ke Kak F

17 Noun Ouk F

18 Noun Thath F

19 Duong Phat F

20 Eam Peth F

21 Eam Sam Ang M

22 Phan Samnang F

24

23 Ouk Yeun M

- Attended List of Meeting in Khnar Chmar Commune, Samaki Meanchey District (KCH13,13A)


1 Kear Kum M Khnar Chmar Commune

Commune Chief 012 490 085

2 Seung Seth M - Village Chief 077 918 116

3 Phath Saveun F - Commune Council 099 808 676

4 Mom Eas M - Village Chief 077 393 236

5 Phal Nom M - Deputy commune chief

092 939 986

6 Ean Sokhom M - Deputy village Chief

7 Soun Sareun M - Deputy village Chief

8 Sin Sophal M - Villager

9 Kim Eoun M - -

10 Tit Loun F - -

11 Ngem Yum F - -

12 Mom Vor F - -

13 Mech Yeak F - -

14 Oun Yeang F - -

15 Nong Sophal F - -

16 Houn Run M - -

17 Pou Trea F - -

18 Chhit Thol F - -

19 Mom Peung F - -

20 Pou Lach M - -

21 Mech Sareun F - -

22 Neang Sim M - -

23 Mai Sreylak F - -

24 Mech Sarem F - -

25 Naim Sarim M - -

26 Kouy Oun M - -

27 Yan Phath M - -

28 Hung Seak F - -

29 Kim Ol M - -

30 Chhing Chhea M - -

31 But Sarun F - -

32 Sam Samon M - -

1

APPENDIX D: MINUTES OF THE CONSULTATION MEETINGS CONDUCTED IN THE MEKONG ISLANDS

ON 31 DECEMBER 2019

Consultation Meeting with the Commune and Village Leaders, Head of the Government Secondary School, and Villagers in ST 1C (Kaoh Soutin Island) by the International Safeguards and Social development Specialist, and the National Labor and Gender Specialist

• List of Participants: 1. Mrs. Sun Chantha - Commune Chief 2. Mr. Pheav Mong - Deputy Commune Chief 3. Mr. Som Sery - Commune Council Member 4. Mr. Tim Seng - Commune Council Member 5. Mr. Ly San Chou, Commune Council Member 6. Mr. Lim Phany, Commune Council Member 7. Mr. Chhean Sokkheng - Commune Council Clerk 8. Mr. Monk Sary - High School Director 9. Mr. Mong Sokea - School Assistant Staff 10. Mr. Chhim Bun Thoeun - School Assistant Staff 11. Mr. Chhan Seang - Village Chief 12. Mr. Ngoun Chheav - Deputy Village Chief 13. Mr. Norng Narong - Villager 14. Mr. An Narong - Villager 15. Plus, more than 30 students (more than 50% girls)

Total Number of Participants = 14 (1 female) plus more than 30 students mostly girls (as shown in the picture under ST 1C. Grand Total No. of People Consulted = 44 people

• Highlights of the Consultation Meeting and Relevant Information Gathered

1. The commune and village chiefs are very happy that the existing road has been considered or included in the additional roads to be improved under the RRIP II. There is an existing concrete road in the commune, however the existing road going to the government high school is not yet improved or made of concrete. The Commune/ Village leaders approached PDRD and local government authorities to seek for assistance by having the road that is linked to the school be improved because there are may students enrolled in that school, from the commune and adjacent areas. It is far from the houses and the students have a problem going to school during wet season.

2. The road project will benefit the people in two communes, namely: Kaoh Soutin and Kaoh Mitt. The commune through commune funds had been improving the road the past years using the commune funds because the know that the road is a great help to the students. If the road is improved many students will be able to finish their studies, and other students far from the school including girls, wold be motivated to go to school using bicycles and/ or motorcycles.

3. During the road construction (if the road section will be improved), local people including women would like to work after planting and / or harvest season.

4. The High School Director provided the following information:

- Total number of students enrolled in the school is 643 including 345 girls or 54% of the total number of students.

- Total number of teachers is 40, of which 22 are women (55%).

- The school has been existing since 1985.

- The road once improved will be a great help to the students, school personnel, parents when attending meetings, and villagers because the road is a main road where there are many people/ commuters that use it daily. Many students use bicycles and motorcycles when going to school. The road is very muddy during wet season and when the island is flooded. The school is located on a high ground and serves as an evacuation center or temporary place where some households in flooded areas could take refuge (the school has a big

2

campus).

5. Separate consultation with over 30 students (more than 50% girls):

- All of the students consulted during the consultation meeting were very happy after knowing that the road going to their school has been included in the proposed roads that will be improved (concrete).

- They have expressed gratitude to MRD/ Local Authorities/ ADB, etc. In advance. They really would like to have an improved road because the students have difficulty going to school if the road is muddy. They have to wash their school uniforms daily which is time consuming.

- The students would like to finish their studies so that they could help their parents improve their living condition, whom they described their economic condition as poor. Most of the students would like to be teachers because they want to serve the villages is the islands; others would like to be a doctor, policemen/ women, have car repair shops and business in the future.

- They appeal to the government to start the road improvement in the road section going to their school as soon as possible, and had expressed thanks in advance.

- There are Cham (muslim) students enrolled in the school.

6. No LAR impacts in the said road section as the existing road is already wide; commune maintained the road using commune funds. The proposed road will connect the end point of the concrete road in Kaoh Soutin to the High School. 7. No social/ gender related issues are expected to arise during the road construction. The road once improved will provide greater benefits to the students, school personnel and local people. More than 50% of the students and teachers are girls using bicycles and motorcycles. The school provides information to students on road safety awareness, HIV/ AIDS awareness, had expressed support these programs during the construction of the project. 8. Overall recommendation for the Road section: Strongly recommended for road improvement.

PICTURES DURING THE CONSULTATION MEETINGS, AND SITE VISITS IN MEKONG ISLANDS HELD 31 DECEMBER 2019

ST1C - Kaoh Soutin Island

The commune and village leaders at the end point of the concrete road in Kaoh Soutin (included under the original RRIP II and has been complete).

The Commune and Village Leaders, some villagers, High School Director and Staff, and the DDIS consultants (international safeguards and social development specialist and national labor and gender specialist) during the site visit and consultation meeting.

3

The commune and village leaders, and school director and staff, and some villagers during the consultation meeting.

The DDIS international safeguards and social development specialist, and national labor and gender specialist conducting consultation with the high school students (most of the participants were girls). The school director and teachers/ assistant staff, and commune and village leaders were also present during the consultation meeting with the students. 100% of the students would like the road that is linked to the school to be improved as it will be provide them easier access, faster and more convenient travel when going to school and back home.

The high school students, school director and teachers and commune/ village leaders

ST1E - Kaoh Soutin Island

Consultation with the Village Chief in the proposed additional road for improvement.

The road will provide access to the pagoda.

Pictures of additional roads in Mekong Island proposed for improvement under the RRIP II Additional Roads; and Consultation/ FGD with the villagers/ village leaders.

4

Pictures of other road sections in Kaoh Soutin and Kaoh Mitt islands with road sections proposed for improvement under RRIP II.

Consultation with the villagers. They are very happy to hear that the road will be improved. The road is linked up to an existing road included under the original RRIP II (with access to the ponds).

Existing road is wide and have no LAR impacts. Very dusty during dry season and not accessible (muddy) when flooded/ heavy rains.

Consultation with the Commune Chief.

KC 18, Kampong Cham Province

The road is wide and is a busy road. Many villagers use the road when going to the market. Many

trucks and other kinds of vehicles use the road. NO LAR impact as the existing road is wide.

One shop owners along the existing road has many customers (villagers) who buy meat, vegetables and other goods for daily needs. There are many shops along the road, and the road once improved will provide them better access to markets where they buy goods for sale in their small shops in the village. Likewise, the villagers will have easier access to basic facilities; the farmers as well when transporting

Local villagers are very happy of the plan to improve the road because they said it is very dusty, not good for the health of children and elderly people. During wet season or heavy rains, the road is not also accessible due to mud. They would like the road to be improved (DBST or concrete) as soon as possible. They said they had been waiting for the road to be

5

agricultural products. improved.

Women and other villagers consulted. They would like the road to be improved for the reason cited above. Many shops located along the road. They had been waiting for the road to be improved for so many years. They appealed to the government to start the construction as soon as possible.

1

APPENDIX E:

ATTENDANCE SHEETS

1

APPENDIX F: SUMMARY OF ADDITIONAL ROADS UNDER RRIP II

No. Road Road Section District Name

Commune Length (Km)

Existing (m)

Carriageway (m)

Shoulder (m)

Total (m)

Pavement type

Tboung Khmum

1 TBK1

Peam Chilaing Tboung Khmum

Peam Chilaing

2.16 7.5~8.1 6.0 1.0x2 8.0 CRCP

2 TBK1A 0.23 7.0~7.5 6.0 0.5x2 7.0 CRCP

3 TBK2 0.54 6.9~7.0 6.0 0.5x2 7.0 CRCP

4 TBK3 0.1 7.0~7.2 5.0 5.0 CRCP

5 TBK4 Phume 67 - Thmar Pech Ti

2 Tboung Khmum

Thmor Pich 5.64 6.9~7.5 6.0 0.5x2 7.0 DBST

6 TBK5 Tuol Sophy - Srespey Oraing Ov Toul

Sophy, Korg Chey

9.68 6.0~7.5 6.0 0.5x2 7.0 DBST

7 TBK6 Kilo 23 - Trapaing Pring Memot, Dambe

Rumchek, Trapaing

Pring 11.72 6.9~7.5 6.0 0.5x2 7.0 DBST

8 TBK7 Kilo 30 - Sok San Memot Rumchek 8.18 7.0~7.5 6.0 0.5x2 7.0 DBST

9 TBK8 Kraleung Soth - Chan

MoulDBST Memot Chan Moul 9.49 7.9~8.2 6.0 1.0x2 8.0 DBST

10 PI 11

Road In Koh Pir Krochhmar Koh Pir

1.66 5.0~5.5 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

11 PI 12 0.99 5.0~5.6 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

12 PI 13 1.03 5.0~5.2 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

Sun total 51.42

Kampong Cham

1 SA 5 Road In Koh Samroang Kampong

Siem Koh

Samroang 1.28 5.0~5.5 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

2 MI 1E Road In Koh Mitt

Kampong Siem

Koh Mitt 0.34 5.0~5.4 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

3 MI 1F 0.48 5.0~5.6 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

4 ST 1C Road in Koh Sotin

Kampong Siem

Koh Sotin 0.5 5.0~5.2 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

5 ST 1D 0.65 5.0~5.5 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

2

6 ST 1E 0.21 5.0~5.3 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

7 ST 6 1.8 5.0~5.6 5.0 0.5x2 6.0 CRCP

8 ST 7 0.85 5.0~5.1 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

9 ST 8 2.01 5.0~5.3 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

10 ST 9 1.2 5.0~5.6 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

11 ST 10 0.33 5.0~5.2 4.0 0.5x2 5.0 CRCP

Sun total 9.65

Kampong Thom

1 KT5 Stuong - Tamoeu Stuong Trea,

Bateay Stoung

8.27 8.0~9.0 6.0 1.0x2 8.0 DBST

Sun total 8.27

Kampong Seu

1 KSP1FD Flood Damage Section Phnom Srouch

Kirivaon 2.77 8.0~9.0 6.0 1.0x2 8.0 DBST

Sun total 2.77

Kampong Chhnang

1 KCH13 Khna Chhmar - Chrey Kaong

Sammeakki Mean Chey, Teuk Phos

Khnar Chhmar,

Akphivadth

4.89 5.0 ~ 7.0

4.0 ~ 6.0 0.5x2 5.0~7.0 DBST

2 KCH13A 0.31 6.5~7.2 6.0 0.5x2 7.0 DBST

3 KCH14 Kraing Lvea - Thnal Sammeakki Mean Chey,

Kraing Lvea

1.98 6.9~7.5 6.0 0.5x2 7.0 DBST

Sun total 7.18

28 Grand Total 79.29

Source: MRD, DDIS. RRIP II. Jan. 2020

1

APPENDIX H: LOCATION MAPS OF THE ADDITIONAL ROADS UNDER RRIP II

2

1. Location Map in Tboung Khmum and Kampong Cham

2. Location Map in Kampong Thom

4

3. Location Map in Kampong Speu

5

4. Location Map in Kampong Chhnang

1

APPENDIX H: SOCIO- DEMOGRAPHIC DATA IN RRIP II ADDITIONAL ROADS (BY COMMUNE/ DISTRICT AND PROVINCE)

Road ID Province District Commune/

Sangkat

Population Number

of

House

holds

Number

of

Familie

s

Wom

en

Head

ed

HHs

HIV/AIDS

Cases IPs Khmer Islam

ID Poor

(Family)

Number of

Immigrants

Number of School

Dropouts (Year 2018)

Total F Total F Fami

lies F M

Famil

ies Total F

Poor-

Level

1

Poor

Level

2

Inside the

country

Outside the

country

Primary

school

secondary

school High school

Total F Total F Tota

l F Total F Total F

KC14,14A,14

B 14C TBK

TBK Peam

Chilaing 9,994 4,786 1944 2250 301 3 1 0 0 0 850 3352 1691 77 337 331 157 110 41 73 38 19 12 6 1

PI 11,12.13 Kroch

Chmar Kaoh Pir 2,420 1,244 540 635 152 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 59 133 66 14 7 0 0 1 0 no no

SA 5

KC K.Seam

Kaoh

Samroang 6,615 3,415 1,237 1560 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 45 1167 675 265 121 0 0 4 1 no no

MI 1E,1F Kaoh Mitt 7,900 4,081 1,249 1788 279 8 5 0 0 0 1 2 1 74 63 86 45 92 64 0 0 15 12 0 0

ST 1C,1D,1E,

6,7,8,9,10 Kaoh Soutin

9,043 ,5060 1,964 3127 486 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 209 1246 716 78 40 0 0 0 0 0 0

KT 15 KT Stoung Trea 13,304 6,971 2,309 2964 398 19 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 355 516 181 107 37 17 no no no no no no

Banteay

Stoung 12,592 6,494 2,472 2744 402 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 356 509 1150 671 601 285 12 5 8 1 0 0

KC 13

TBK

TBK Thmar Pich 14,615 7,596 3,049 3345 619 17 7 0 0 0 651 2705 1373 195 270 417 279 131 67 42 19 41 24 0 0

KC 18 O.Ov Toul Sophy 1,0067 5,177 1,976 2275 322 21 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 193 822 791 791 336 10 6 11 4 0 0

KC 15

Memut Rumchek 13,455 6,577 3,181 3062 465 6 4 0 0 0 941 4347 2217 196 207 574 232 182 76 45 20 6 2 0 0

DamBae Trapaing

Pring 14,803 7,517 3,238 3251 318 0 0 0 0 0 733 3141 1569 227 255 354 258 127 79 0 0 0 0 0 0

KC 16 Memut

Rumchek 13,455 6,577 3181 3062 465 6 4 0 0 0 941 4347 2217 196 207 574 232 182 76 45 20 6 2 0 0

KC 17 Chan Moul 5,503 2,795 1,270 1273 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 153 114 60 72 46 no no 58 34 0 0

KSP 1FD KSP P.Sroch

Tang Sya 3,967 2,003 829 964 175 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 32 10 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tang

Sanroang 10,251 5,280 1,813 1813 349 0 0 0 0 0 43 229 98 21 104 884 709 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

KCH13,13A

KCH

S. Mean

T. chey

Khnar Chmar 7,608 4,086 2,035 2117 343 6 5 0 0 0 92 342 122 125 303 108 50 67 15 0 0 11 3 6 4

KCH14 Krang Lvea 11,205 5549 2,651 2739 523 12 4 0 0 0 128 480 245 179 310 45 19 164 44 16 6 40 23 19 7

Total 5 9 16 166,797 85,208 34,938 38,969 6,132 110 62 0 0 0 4,380 18,945 9,533 2,423 3,772 8,196 5,073 2,923 1,320 243 114 220 118 31 12

Note: No means data; F= female; M=male; HHs= households; Source of Data: Commune Councils. Dec 2019.

1

APPENDIX I:

MINUTES OF THE CONSULTATION MEETINGS WITH THE LIST OF QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE PARTICIPANTS AND ANSWERS GIVEN, PICTURES AND LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

DURING THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETINGS HELD ON

16 TO 20, AND 24 TO 26 DECEMBER 2019 A. Objectives of the public consultation

1. To inform the local communities and authorities on the proposed project, location, and

activities plan to improve.

2. To assess potential social safeguards impacts, social and gender issues that may arise

during the project implementation through consultation, site visit, and observations.

3. To elicit comments, issues and concerns, and suggestions relevant to the proposed

projects.

B. Summary of Results or Feedbacks from Consultation Meetings and question by

participants.

The social and environmental safeguards team such as: International Social Safeguards and Development Expert, National Social Development (Labor and Gender Specialist), and National Environmental Specialist conducted the public consultation meetings with local authorities and affected households on the proposed additional roads for improvement under RRIP II held on 16-20 and 24-26 December 2019. The consultation meetings were participated by the commune-village leaders and local residents, students, teachers, women, and other stakeholders. The details of the questions raised and answers provided or given to each question are shown in the table below.

C. Consultation Meetings for Tboung Khmum

No.

Date

Venue (Location) (Village,

Commune & Province)


Question and request by participants

Answer

1 19

Dec 2019

TBK1, TBK1A, TBK2, and

TBK3: in Peam Chilaing

Commune, Tboung Khmum District, Tboung

Thmum Province

Please could you construct this

road with concrete because it has

been damaged many years ago

due to flood.

- Mr. Maes Yorn requested 6 m concrete road.

- Ms. Kry Champa also request 6m concrete

- Mr. Huy Leang Hout commune chief: If 6m concrete no resettlement affected;

When the project will start?

Yes, the project will be

considered, the design

proposed will be concrete.

FS and reports required

by ADB for approval before civi works start are being prepared. Will inform you again of the results after ADB’s approval.

2 18 Dec 2019

TBK4: in Thmar Pich Commune, Tboung Khmum District, Tboung Khmum Province

People suggested that proper (big)

culverts be installed by the

contractor for supporting water

flow (run- off flood) and prevent

flooding

- Mr.Chhum Sarun: If DBST 5m width how many meter for shoulder?

When the project will start?

Will inform the technical team

to include in the design.

Maximum 2m of each side.

FS and reports required

by ADB for approval before civil works start are being prepared. Will inform you again of the results after ADB’s approval.

3 18 Dec

TBK5: in Tuol Sophy

- Mr.Yout Yeat: This road improvement should be widened

- The engineer will propose for alignment accordingly to

2

2019 Commune, Oraing Uv District, Tboung Khmum Province

the same size for both road sides. No problem for the local people. We will cooperate. We want the improve concrete road.

- Mr.Nou Vantha commune council: We will help support, don’t worry.

People asked when the road will

be constructed? They want the

DBST road to be constructed

soon.

- Mr.Ly Ratha: I have small shop selling vegetable nearest the road project when the project started I will move back ok?

the existing road.

- If there will be some shops that might be affected temporarily during the construction, contractor/ community will help in moving the shop outside the CoI to make it safer (and after road construction - could put back the shop on a safer location in front of the house or along the improved road).

4 17 Dec 2019

TBK6: in Rumchek and Trapaeng Pring Commune, Memot and Dambe District, Tboung Khmum Province

- They asked when the construction will commence. Mr. Chhin Sarin: How many meters width of DBST? This road improvement should be widened the same size for both road sides. Could I work as labor during construction?

FS and reports required by

ADB for approval before civil

works start are being

prepared. Will inform you

again of the results after

ADB’s approval.

5-6m according to the

existing road.

Local people (men and

women) wants to work in civil

works during road

construction will be hired by

contractor. Men and women

interested to work to earn

income will be encouraged.

GAP has been prepared to

ensure gender

mainstreaming, and

contractor will be provided

orientation/ capacity building.

5 17 Dec 2019

TBK7: in Rumchak Commune, Memot District, Tboung Khmum Province

- Mr. Shin Phan: when the construction will commence?

- Aside from road improvement, will the project also install pipe culverts (for new) and/ or replace pipe culverts that were already worn out?

- During rainy season, water flows on some parts of road (flash flood). Need to design the appropriate culverts (big size) to prevent flood and water to flow freely.

- How may width for DBST?

FS and reports required by

ADB for approval before civil

works start are being

prepared. Will inform you

again of the results after

ADB’s approval.

Pipe culverts will be checked

by engineers, and if bad

quality, it will be replaced.

Around 5-6m according to

the existing roads.

6 16 Dec 2019

TBK8: in Chan Moul Commune, Memot District, Tboung Khmum Province.

We have been waiting for this project a long time. -We are very happy that the road will be improved (DBST road).

- When the construction will commence?

- How may width for DBST?

- All the rural roads in our country need tobe improved not only for this commune.

- Will submit the document to ADB for approval before project could be implemented. Will inform the affected communities prior to project implementation.

- DBST 5-6m according to

3

the existing roads.

7 19 Dec 2019

PI11, PI12, and PI13: in Koh Pi Commune, Kroch Chmar District, Tboung Khmum Province.

- How many meters for our villagers to prepare the shoulder?

- A few road sections are curving; can the project improve to straighten the road alignment for local road safety?

- Mr. Koy Sok village chief: When the project stared?

- No need to move asset at this stage.Residents will be informed and consulted again prior to to start of civil works.

- Will submit the document to ADB for approval around 6 months processing.

- TBK1, TBK1A, TBK2, and TBK3: Consultation meeting in Peam Chilaing, Tboung Khmum District

The existing condition of roads in Peam Chilaing and consultation meeting in Peam Chilaing

Commune.

- TBK4: Consultation Meeting in Thmar Pich Commune, Tboung Khmum District

The existing condition of road TBK-4 and consultation meeting in Thmar Pich Commune

for TBK4

- TBK5: Consultation Meeting in Tuol Sophy Commune, Oraing Ov District

4

The existing road condition, TBK5

Consultation in Tuol Sophy Commune for TBK5

- TBK6: Consultation Meeting in Rumchek, Memot District

Consultation in Rumchak and Trapaeng Pring Commune for TBK6

The existing environmental resources are on the road TBK6

- TBK7: Consultation in Rumvhek Commune, Memot District

Consultation meeting in Rumchak Commune

5

- TBK8: Consultation Meeting in Chan Moul Commune, Memot District

Consultation activities for TBK8 in health center of Chan Moul Commune

The existing condition of environmental and social resources are on the roadway

- PI11, PI12, and PI13: Consultation Meeting in Koh Pi Commune, Kroch Chmar District

The existing condition of roads PI-11, PI-12, and PI-13 and consultation in Koh Pi Commune

6

D. Consultation Meetings for Kampong Cham

No.

Date

Venue (Village,

Commune & Province)



Answers

1 19 Dec 2019

SA5: in Koh Samraong Commune, Kampong Siem District, Kampong Cham Province.

- When this road will be constructed?

- There are some trees and structures located on the RoW, but will not be affected by the road project, because existing road width is about 5-6m.

- The project will construct concrete or DBST road?

- Could the project construct 6m width concrete for this road because the existing is 10m width?

- Will prepare FS report and submit the document to ADB for approval around 6 months

- Yes, the project will be constructed (improvement) on by the existing roads.

- DDIS engineer will propose for a concrete road because this area is always flooded.

- The DDIS engineer will prepare design, to follow the existing roads.

2 20 Dec 2019

MI1E and MI1F: in Koh Mitt Commune, Kampong Siem District, Kampong Cham Province.


- Some trees and structures are located on RoW, but will not be affected by the road project, because existing road width is about 5-6m.

- The project will construct concrete or DBST road?

- Will submit the document to ADB for approval around 6 months

- Yes, the project will be constructed using the existing roads.

- DDIS engineer will propose the concrete roads because this area is always flooded.

3 20 Dec 2019

ST1C, ST1D, ST1E, ST6, ST7, ST8, ST9, and ST10: in Koh Soutin Commune, Kampong Siem District, Kampong Cham Province

- Will the project also install the traffic signs and road safety signs?


- Will the project construct concrete or DBST road?

- Could you tell me how many USD spend per one kilometer for these concrete roads?

- The project includes installation of road safety signs, etc. To ensure road safety. Road safety designs will be prepared by the road safety experts.

- Will submit the document to ADB for approval around 6months.

- DDIS engineer will propose the concrete roads because this area is always flooded.

- According to the DDIS engineer estimated from the last experience project around 200thousand USD per one kilometer long for concretes roads (this could be verified by the project engineers/ MRD) for the exact amount.

7

- SA5: in Koh Samraong Commune, Kampong Siem District

The existing condition of road SA-5 and consultation in Koh Samraong Commune

- Roads MI1E and MI1F: Consultation in Koh Mitt Commune, Kampong Siem District

The existing condition of roads in Koh Mitt and consultation meeting in Koh Mitt Commune

- Road ST1C, ST1D, ST1E, ST6, ST7, ST8, ST9, and ST10: Consultation in Koh Soutin Commune, Kampong Siem District

8

The existing condition of roads in Koh Soutin and consultation meeting in Koh Soutin Commune

E. Consultation Meetings for Kampong Thom

No.

Date

Venue (Village,

Commune & Province)



Answers

1 26 Dec 2019

KT5: in Trea and Banteay Stung Commune, Stung District, Kampong Thom Province

- The project will be constructed with concrete or DBST road?

- We had been waiting for the DBST road for over 30 years, some people said for more than 50 years. We are very happy to hear that the road will be DBST. We want the construction to commence soon.

- When the project will be stared?

- This road will be improved to DBST. The existing road width is large.

- This commune road is lucky then other roads because many rural roads not yet started for feasibly study.

- Will submit the document to ADB for approval around 6months.

- TK5: Consultation Meeting in Trea Commune, Stung District

Existing road condition in Kampong Thom. Very wide, No LAR issue.

9

Consultation meeting with the villagers and commune/ village leaders; and women in KT5 and consultation meeting in Trea Commune.

F. Consultation Meetings for Kampong Speu

No.

Date

Venue (Village,

Commune & Province)



Answers

1 24 Dec 2019

KSP-1FD: In Taing Sya and

Taing Samraong Commune,

Phnom Srouch District,

Kampong Speu Province

- When the project will commence, please help us so that the road will be improved as soon as possible.

- The road section is under the RRIP-2, but this section and bridge is damaged by flood in 2018 in 2.70 km.

- Why the project took long time to be implemented (or road to be repaired), very difficult access to transportation especially during rainy season.

- This time MRD to prepare the documents and submit to ADB for approval.

- So now this road will be improved to DBST, the road same as in the RRIP-2.

- Still in processing the document and send to ADB for approval around 6months from now.

- KSP-1FD: Consultation in Tang Sya and Tang Samraong Commune, Khnom Srouch District

10

The existig condition of road KSP-1FD and consultation in Taing Sya Commune

G. Consultation Meetings for Kampong Chhnang

- KCH14: Consultation in Kraing Lvea Commune, Samaki Meanchey District

The existing condition of road KCH-14 and consultation meeting in Kraing Lvea Commune

- Roads KCH13 and KCH13A: Consultation in Khna Chmar Commune, Sameakki Meanchey District.

No.

Date

Venue (Village,

Commune & Province)



Answers

1 25 Dec 2019

KCH14: in Kraing Lvea Commune, Sameakki Meanchey District, Kampong Chhnang Province

- Will the short road be connected from RRIP2 and RRIP-AF to village area.

- Will the road be improved to DBST road?

- What is the width of DBST road that will be improved?

- How many meters will moved?

- If 10m width will be enough for the DBST road project?

- The road will be improved to DBST; connects from RRIP 2 road (s0me roads are linked up to RRIP 2-AF).

- Will improve the existing road.

- DDIS engineer to prepare the design; from 5-6m for DBST.

- No need to move back if the existing roads width stay in 10m. Not affected.

2 25 Dec 2019

KCH13 and KCH13A: in Khna Chhmar and Chrey Kaong Commune, Sameakki Meanchey District, Kampong Chhnang Province

- What is the width of DBST road that will be improved?

- We had been waiting for long time on improving this road, could you commence this dry season?

- We need this DBST road section, it is very important for our people to go to school, hospital, market, transporting products, and to work for garment factories.

- According to the existing roads will be 5-6m width for DBST, however the engineer will need 1-2m for each side for benching and shoulder.

- MRD and DDIS consultant will try to completed the document as soon as possible and submit to ADB for review and approval.

11

The existing condition of roads and consultation meeting in Khna Chhmar Commune

A. Registry of Participants

The participants were invited from some villages of communes are located along the proposed rural roads of RRIP-2-Additional Roads such as: commune chiefs, commune councils, village chiefs, and representative of some local people are presented in tables below:

1. Consultation Meeting in Tboung Khmum

- Attended List of Meeting in Peam Chilaing Commune, Tboung Khmum District

No Name Sex Village-Commune

Function Phone

1 Houy Leang Hout

M Peam Chilaing Chief Commune 012 442 626

2 Cheam Eng Hort

M - Deputy commune chief

012 991 456

3 Chheng Sophal

M - Commune council

4 Chap Engkhim M - Village chief 017 970 279

5 Phon Phean M - Villager

6 Van Bothen F - -

7 Try Sangna F - -

8 Try Champa F - -

9 Nao Sarum M - -

10 Kry Sath M - -

11 Chhun Houy M -

12 Meas Yorn M - -

13 Seng Soklim F - -

14 LachPeng Sreang

M - -

15 San Sang Onn M - Deputy village chief 012 538 178

16 Vin Song Born M - Villager 097 867 625

12

17 Min Bunthach F - School Teacher 092 513 393

18 Sour Horng M - Villager

19 ChhunBun Khung

F - -

20 Pen Vanna M - -

- Attended List of Meeting in Thmar Pich Commune, Tboung Khmum District (TBK4)


1 Yong Visai M Thmar Pich Commune

Deputy village chief

2 Yun Chhouk F - Villager

3 Pouk Saing Leng

F - -

4 Onn Pouk F - -

5 Chae Sophal M - -

6 Sroun Poa F - -

7 Em Chhoun M - -

8 San Onn F - -

9 Var Onn F - -

10 Born Seang F - -

11 Chhum Kret M - -

12 Than Touch F - -

13 Say Sarum F - -

14 Sun Nach F - -

15 That Ngor F - -

16 Loun Eng M - -

17 Hun Chan F - -

18 Khloth Srey F - -

19 Am Chhey Hag

F - -

20 Bou Samy F - -

21 Chhem Chrip F - -

22 Chhum Sarum M Thmar Pich Commune

Commune Council

23 Kong Kunthy M - Commune Council

24 Tim Deth M - Commune Council

25 Anth Hong M - Villager

26 Cheth Cheat M - -

- Attended List of Meeting in Tuol Sophy Commune, Oraing Ov District (TBK5)


1 Chhon Sang On

F Tuol Sophy Commune

Villager

2 To Neang F - -

3 Thol Thoun M - -

4 Chey Reun M - -

5 Var Srey F - -

6 Sreng Sret M - -

7 Chhay Map M - -

8 Hol Sopheap F - -

9 Pen Siloun F - -

10 Yan Srang F - -

11 Soun Chanseng

F - -

13

12 Sen Savy F - -

13 Sen Sreang M - -

14 Sroun Sam On M - -

15 Sorn Reth M - -

16 Leng Kim M - -

17 Chhorn Sokha F - -

18 Kheat Ky F - -

19 Tit Phal M - -

20 Ith Soung M - -

21 Sem Souy M - -

22 Phalla F - -

23 Souy Chhean F - -

24 Ith Phan F - -

25 Sean Sony F -

26 Hout Hun F -

27 Seng Kheun M -

28 Nos Theun M -

29 Hag Han M -

30 Kong Chamreun

M Tuol Sophy Deputy commune chief

31 Chan Bo M - Commune Council

32 Louch Leang M - Villager

33 Chan Thy M - -

34 Meas Mon M - -

35 Nov Nim M - -

36 Neth Nam M - -

37 Von Vuth M - -

38 Teuk Sean M - -

39 Han Sak M - -

40 Vath Maly F - -

41 Tol Srey San F - -

42 Kong Sinat F - -

43 Nos Buntheun M

44 Yem Yat M

45 Phy Chhi M

46 Ning Chea M

47 Kan Kheng M

48 Kun Tim M

49 Youk Vudy M

50 Tep Chhorn M

51 Chhai Lim M

52 Yout Thy M

53 Dan Houn M

54 Chheng Phalla M

55 Krouch Samel M

56 Kung Sophath M

57 Srang Kheng M

58 Ngip Phal M

59 Khun Kheun M Tuol Sophy Village chief 088 144 2466

60 Tep Sao M - Villager 088 251 0306

61 Ou Sarum M - Village member

62 Ly Rotha M - Village member

63 Yeun Votha M - Village Chief 097 604 8548

64 Yat Tho M - Commune Council

14

- Attended List of Meeting in Rumchek and Trapaeng Pring Commune, Memut District (TBK6)


1 Sok Narith F Rumchek commune

Commune Chief


3 Sorn San M Thmar Dap, Rumchek

Village Chief

4 Kheng Eng M - Villager

5 Koa Kan M - -

6 No Sok Hen M - -

7 Loun Chheang M - -

8 Mon Pheoun M - -

9 Yom Keat F - -

10 Thon Thol M - -

11 Theoun Sokha M - -

12 Meoun Saman F - -

13 Than Pan F - -

14 Ngoun Kou F - -

15 Him Hun F - -

16 Chhum Krep F - -

17 Man Sarin M Trapaeng Pring Commune

Village Chief

18 Hap Chan M

19 Kheng Mon M

20 Chae On M

21 Chhin Sarin M

22 Orm Thuy M

23 Thorng Thouch F

24 Vin Van M

25 San Hang M

26 Sem Lorn M

27 Ma Man M

28 Theap Theoun M

29 Yann Veoun M

30 Khmuy Veoun M

31 Man Teas M

32 Yeoun Yeang F

- Attended List of Meeting in Rumchek Commune, Memut District (TBK7)


Function Phone

1 Sok Narith F Rumchek Commune

Commune Chief


3 San Sareun M - Village chief

4 Long Sokha M - Villager

5 Chhum Kheang

M - -

6 Hen Keoun M - -

7 Ham Thy M - -

8 Chhun Channeun

M - -

9 Nges Hor M - -

15

10 Keo Heun M - -

11 Seoun Phan M - -

12 Klork Deth M - -

13 Chhim Kheoun F - -

14 Khoun Savy F - -

15 Keo Khet F - -

16 Meoung Sineth F - -

17 Reth Neth F - -

18 Sim Sareoun F - -

19 Chreun San F - -

20 Ly Vanset M - Village Chief

21 Ly Gour F - Deputy village chief

22 Ouk Pleu M - Group leader

23 Yep Anth M -

24 Eal Mouslim M - School Teacher

25 Yem Kao M -

26 Soth Him M -

27 Math Man M -

28 Math Dollas M -

29 San Las M -

30 Hak Yousos F -

31 Nou Sleas F -

32 Chip Anth M -

33 Math Soran M -

34 Mao Vanny F -

35 Krem You M -

36 Ear Lim M -

37 Kao Sma Eal M

38 Sen Him M

39 Sos Saran M

40 Sos Vy F

41 Nao Naseak F

42 Yup Yar F

43 Run Sly Man M

44 Eal Sles M

45 Him Yousos M

46 Man Limrun M

47 Sles Eal F

48 Sony Imrun M

49 Eal Thyes F

50 Mao Maravy F

51 Ya Sares F

52 Math Salas M

53 Him Kriya M

54 Sos Eal M

55 Sman Hout M

56 Lu Notin M

57 Roun Youn M

58 San Sai Yop M

59 Las Say Man M

- Attended List of Meeting in Chan Moul Commune, Memut District (TBK8)


1 Mea Sarum M Chan Moul commune

Commune chief 097 767 2736

2 Prak F - Deputy 088 854 3768

16

Kakada commune chief

3 Kong Soth M - Deputy commune chief

4 Prum Son M - Commune Council

5 Tep Sarun M - -

6 Veoun Sareth

F - Commune Assistant

097 561 4517

7 Bour Chheang

M - Village chief

8 Bin Ngor M - Deputy village chief

9 San Ron M - Villager

10 NGork Sok M - -

11 Real Ngeur F - -

12 In Yim F - -

13 Khat Yan F - -

14 Rath Siyeun F - -

15 San Saray F - -

16 Long Sophal

F - -

17 Ouch Sayeun

F - -

18 Lim Phal M - -

19 Ngor Ngean M - -

20 Rous Reth M - -

21 Eoun Seoun F - -

22 Yeth Chantrea

M - -

23 Sun Tep M - -

24 Keo Chhreng

M - Village chief

25 Oun Chon M - Deputy village chief

26 Seuk Sveat M - Villager

27 Thlok Thon M - -

28 Yeun Veun M - -

29 Seuk Seak M - -

30 Koch Thong M - -

31 Tit Soun M - -

32 Sorn Seung M - -

33 Soun Ny F - -

34 Ky Ny M - -

35 Kun Neun M - -

36 Neang Han M - -

37 Hun Run M - -

38 Sem Pav M - -

39 Sok Vor M - -

40 Nou Chhoun

M - -

41 Run Sinath F - -

42 Nut Sarin F - -

43 Tep Ren M - -

44 Run Bunny M - -

45 Ngout Tot M - -

46 Ban Samol M - -

17

- Attended List of Meeting in Koh Pi Commune, Kroch Chmar District (PI11, PI12, PI13)


Function Phone

1 Khov Our M Koh Pi Commune chief 011 953 225

2 Long Sok M - Deputy commune chief

012 632 101

3 Ek Thon M - Deputy commune chief

097 634 1507

4 Soum Vibol M - Commune council 088 862 3001

5 Koy Sok M - Village chief 088 439 3665

6 Ear Meng Srey M - Villager

7 Lay Chheng Try M - -

8 Kim Lov M - -

9 Ann Oun M - -

10 Hang Heng M - -

11 Chhrey Si Eang F - -

12 Heng Son F - -

13 Luy Kim Sang M - -

14 Noy Hang M - -

15 Tou Ang Heng M - -

16 Mon Sok Meng M - -

17 Chrek Sreng M - -

18 Seng Nai Ann F - -

19 Lot Eng Kim F - -

20 Mich Chhen F - -

21 Mich Chreounk F - -

22 Chhun Hai M - Village chief 088 439 3314

23 Chhi Suy Ang F - Villager

24 Keat Kan M - -

25 Mean Mao M - -

26 Khou Sam Leng M - -

27 Khim No M - -

28 Chhean Sokhom M - -

29 Houy Chamreoun M - -

30 Hak Lang M - -

31 Keo Kim Horn M - -

32 Thong Yeung F - -

33 Bek Chheng Hag F - -

34 OunChhengNang F - -

35 KayChheng Ngun

M - -

36 Mao Chheng Or F - -

37 Loug Meng Houn M - -

38 Bren Kouch F - -

39 Ann Eth M - Village Chief 092 874 639

40 Chheng Neang F - Villager

41 Than Mom F

42 Chhun Sang F

43 Horng Heak F

44 Vann Chan F

45 Bun Hory M

18

46 Hanh Nesy F

47 Outh Sambat F

48 Tha Sok Leang F

49 Broch Yeat M

50 Va Chheng Srun M

51 San Tong M

52 Brech Tho M

53 Kim Leng M

54 Loy Thol M

55 Me Ang M

56 Pheng Sokheng F

57 Nong SoKear F

58 Lak Hum Leng M

59 Ork Chheng F

2. Consultation Meeting in Kampong Cham

- Attended List of Meeting in Koh Samraong Commune, Kampong Siem District (SA5)


Function Phone

1 San Sok M Koh Samraong Commune Chief 097 725 8428

2 Tit Vanak F - Deputy commune chief

3 Dy Kouch M - Villager

4 Ham Sang Keng

M

5 Phay Chea M

6 Chhay Yet F

7 Sin Cheav M

8 Pouv Im F

9 Hak Sokchea F

10 Ham Kang M

11 Se Sok Nao M

12 Tho Meth M

13 Sous Sy F

14 Toun Heng F

15 Mom Prum M

16 Ngouv Hang F

17 Yean Sinat F

18 Lim Mao F

19 Sok Chheng Hat

M

20 Ouk Lang M

21 Souk Sunheng M

22 Kung Kim M

23 Onn Chhai Leang

F

24 Chhun Run M

25 Hak Sokchea M

26 Sin Chhea M

27 Born Bunheng M

28 Chhor Roun F

29 Ngoun Nat F

30 Chhiv Chhunlay

M

19

31 Meung Ky M

32 Hem Sarun M

33 Thant Molika F

34 Chan Neth F

- Attended List of Meeting in Koh Mith Commune, Kampong Siem District (MI1E, MI1F)


Function Phone

1 Meth Song Heng

M Koh Mith Commune

Village Chief 011 800 939

2 Nhip Sokheng M - Villager

3 Chhi Pum M -

4 Hak Lim Ngon M -

5 Lim Sivath M -

6 Chang Mork M -

7 Moung Tesour M -

8 Tim Sareun M -

9 Boung Reth M - Deputy village chief

10 Long Kimhorn M - Villager 088 799 0009

11 Sar Chea M - -

12 Eam Thon M - -

13 Heng Seng Heng

M - -

14 Cheng Srun M - -

15 Rouch Marun F - -

16 Chhun Leng M - -

17 Khin Sokun F - -

18 Peng Chhunleng

M - -

19 Ven Neang M - Commune Chief 012 981 426

20 Ouk Than M - Deputy commune chief

011 602 030

21 Mao Ourk M - Deputy commune chief

097 707 0757

22 Sun Heng Srouch

M - -

23 Top Phat M

- Attended List of Meeting in Koh Sotin Commune, Kampong Siem District (roads in Koh Soutin)


1 Tak Naisim F Village 3, Koh Sotin

Villager

2 Kang Leap F - -

3 Rim Mai F - -

4 Soy Sineng F - -

5 Sngoun Heng M - -

6 Pork Heong M - -

7 Kang Kimlang F - -

8 Leung Sophealy

F - -

9 Houy Kimhan M - -

10 Ann Narong M - -

11 Kao Sithan F - -

20

12 Mao Dem F - -

13 Eath Sreang M - -

14 Sun Meth M - -

15 Soung Sam On

F - -

16 Nong Nean F - -

17 Yout Reth M - -

18 Mok Leang M - -

19 Yon Chantha M - -

20 Ear Khen M - -

21 Srey Noup F - -

22 Kung Sun M - -

23 Phut Min M - -

24 John Phat M - -

25 Be Sareun F - -

26 Yout Ky F - -

27 Kruy Seng Teang

F - -

28 Peng Heng F - -

29 Yout Chan M - -

30 Chea Sreung M - -

31 Phang Heng F - -

32 Chheang Chea

M - -

33 Kheiv Sam M - -

34 Oum Vanna M - -

35 Khat Sa Eam M Village 10, Koh Sotin

Village Chief

36 Som Many M - Deputy village chief

092 841 492

37 Prak Ban M - Village member

38 Krouch Thy M - -

39 Ean Phal M - -

40 Hong Hen M - -

41 Khat Rin M - -

42 Khouy Chhouk M - -

43 Ouk Paov M

44 Lim Kimhout M

45 Leng Reth M

46 Phat Phea M

47 Han Kimhean F

48 Phung Chanthol

F

49 Leng Chantha F

50 Eng Nim F

51 Sok Chhean M

52 Mout Chany F

53 San Mom F

54 Van Leav F

55 Han Lang Meng

F

56 Yem Ouk M

3. Consultation Meeting in Kampong Thom

- Attended List of Meeting in Trea and Bantey Stung Commune, Stung District (KT5)

21


Function Phone

1 Kan Seoun M Trea Commune Deputy commune chief

092 534 057

2 Chhing Leang M - Deputy commune chief

092 886 249

3 On Ouy M - Commune Council 076 777 9151

4 Chheam Chhort

M Commune Council

5 Yin Kun M Villager

6 Chorn Born M -

7 Yan Khom M Village Chief 012 176 1281

8 Lao Rous M Deputy village chief 097 485 1791

9 Sorth Reth F Villager

10 Say Choy M Village Chief 092 247 231

11 Yan Khom M

12 Lao Rous M

13 Sorth Reth F

14 Yin Kun M Commune Council

15 Oum Dan M Villager

16 Tim Van F -

17 Chea Vy F -

18 Ann Hai F -

19 Heoun Than M -

20 Horn Hon M -

21 Lu Vy F -

22 In That F -

23 Chhun Khe M -

24 Sim Yout M -

25 Yann Reun F -

26 Van Sok F -

27 Hav Pheap F

28 Phat Phon M

29 Yim Yeth M

30 Long Ran F

31 Ny Kaom F

32 Yim Meth F

33 Chhorn Your F Banteay Stung Commune council

34 Chea Thy M - Commune Assistant

017 405 349

35 Yous Sareth M - Village chief 092 690 348

36 Tom Thet M

37 Pan Chheun M

38 Yong Ya M

39 Chhoun Thoun

M

40 Sin Mao F

41 He Sim F

42 Yun Chhoy F

43 Chea Thin M

44 Phan Mey M

45 Hang Lorn M

22

46 Yem Yip M

47 Suth Ser M

48 Mouy Sok F

49 Thin Vy F

50 Norn Keur F

51 Chheng Tom F

4. Consultation Meeting in Kampong Speu

- Attended List of Meeting in Tang Samraong and Tang Sya Commune, Phnom Srouch District (KSP-1FD)


1 Ouk Klean M Tang Samraong Commune Council 096 712 9696

2 Mouk Buny M - Commune security

3 Kn Van M - Deputy village chief

096 562 1919

4 Neum Vin M - Villager

5 Mao Thim M - -

6 Heang Solin M - -

7 Hay Hun M - -

8 Yim Sann M - -

9 Bo Sareun M - -

10 Khiev Heng M - -

11 Meas Sokhan F Tang Sya Commune

Villager

12 Touch Binheng

M - -

5. Consultation Meeting in Kampong Chnang

- Attended List of Meeting in Kraing Lvear Commune, Samaki Meanchey District (KCH14)


1 Khlaing Ry M Kraing Lvear Commune Chief 089 770 438

2 Hak Bunny M - Villager

3 Ouk Sareun M

4 Deap Deum M

5 Kit Sokra F -

6 Mai Treung M

7 Bou Yeak Heak

M

8 Puth Onn M

9 Hung Mao F

10 Phan Sarum F

11 Mai Kimhou M

12 Tan Vibol M

13 Sok Saovy F

14 Lim Phanna F

15 Chean Sopheang

F

16 Ke Kak F

17 Noun Ouk F

18 Noun Thath F

19 Duong Phat F

20 Eam Peth F

21 Eam Sam Ang M

23

22 Phan Samnang

F

23 Ouk Yeun M

- Attended List of Meeting in Khnar Chmar Commune, Samaki Meanchey District (KCH13,13A)


1 Kear Kum M Khnar Chmar Commune

Commune Chief 012 490 085

2 Seung Seth M - Village Chief 077 918 116

3 Phath Saveun F - Commune Council

099 808 676

4 Mom Eas M - Village Chief 077 393 236

5 Phal Nom M - Deputy commune chief

092 939 986

6 Ean Sokhom M - Deputy village Chief

7 Soun Sareun M - Deputy village Chief

8 Sin Sophal M - Villager

9 Kim Eoun M - -

10 Tit Loun F - -

11 Ngem Yum F - -

12 Mom Vor F - -

13 Mech Yeak F - -

14 Oun Yeang F - -

15 Nong Sophal F - -

16 Houn Run M - -

17 Pou Trea F - -

18 Chhit Thol F - -

19 Mom Peung F - -

20 Pou Lach M - -

21 Mech Sareun F - -

22 Neang Sim M - -

23 Mai Sreylak F - -

24 Mech Sarem F - -

25 Naim Sarim M - -

26 Kouy Oun M - -

27 Yan Phath M - -

28 Hung Seak F - -

29 Kim Ol M - -

30 Chhing Chhea M - -

31 But Sarun F - -

32 Sam Samon M - -

of 9

ADB SAMPLE COMPLAINT LETTER

Appendix J

(Date)

Complaint Receiving Officer

Accountability Mechanism Asian

Development Bank

6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City

1550 Metro Manila, Philippines

Dear Sir:

We, who have signed this letter, are residents of (MAILING ADDRESS OF COMPLAINANTS) and would like to

file a complaint regarding the (NAME OF PROJECT), an ADB-assisted Project.

We believe that due to this Project, we have suffered or are likely to suffer the following: (LIST DOWN

ALLEGED DIRECT AND MATERIAL EFFECT OF PROJECT TO COMPLAINANTS)

We have previously raised our concerns with the (SPECIFY ADB OFFICE), but are not satisfied with the results.

Below is a summary of what happened: (INSERT SUMMARY OF EVENTS)

Hence, we are choosing problem solving with the Special Project Facilitator (SPF) or compliance review with

the Compliance Review Panel (CRP). (CHOOSE ONE)

We request (or do not request) that you keep our identities confidential.

We have authorized Mr./Mrs./Ms. ______________________________________, with the following details,

to represent us in this complaint:

Mailing Address: __________________________

Email: __________________________

Telephone: __________________________

Fax: __________________________

(OMIT THIS PARAGRAPH, IF THERE IS NO REPRESENTATIVE.)

Please see below our other contact details:

Email: __________________________

Telephone: __________________________

Fax: __________________________

Sincerely,

Signature

Name of Complainant with designation (e.g. Mr., Mrs., Ms.)

Signature:

Name of Complainant with designation (e.g. Mr., Mrs., Ms.)

Signature:

Name of Representative with designation (e.g. Mr., Mrs., Ms.)

(OMIT THIS PORTION, IF THERE IS NO REPRESENTATIVE)

of 9

Asian Development Bank (ADB), Accountability Mechanism, Complaint Form

Asian Development Bank (ADB), Accountability Mechanism, Complaint Form

(Add rows or pages, if needed)

A. Choice of function - problem solving or compliance review (Choose one below)

Special Project Facilitator for problem solving (Assists people who are directly and materially harmed by specific problems caused, or is likely to be

caused, by ADB-assisted projects through informal, flexible, and consensus-based methods with the consent and participation of all parties concerned)

Compliance Review Panel for compliance review (Investigates alleged noncompliance by ADB with its operational policies and procedures in any ADB-

assisted project in the course of the formulation, processing, or implementation of the project that directly, materially, and adversely affects, or is likely to

affect, local people, as well as monitors the implementation of remedial action relates to the harm or likely harm caused by noncompliance)

B. Confidentiality

Do you want your identities to be kept confidential? Yes No

C. Complainants (Anonymous complaints will not be accepted. There must be at least two project-affected complainants.)

Authorized Representative or Assistant (if any). (Information regarding the representatives, or persons assisting complainants in filing the complaint, will

be disclosed, except when they are also complainants and they request confidentiality.)

Name and designation

(Mr., Ms., Mrs.)

Signature Position/

Organization (If any)

Mailing Address Telephone

number

(landline/mobile)

E-mail

address

1.

2.

of 9

Complainant

represented

Name and

designation

(Mr., Ms., Mrs.)

Signature Position/

Organization (If any)

Mailing Address Telephone

number

(landline/mobile)

E-mail

address

D. Project

Name

Location

Brief description

E. Complaint:

What direct and material harm has the ADB-assisted project caused, or will likely cause, to the complainants?

Have the complainants made prior efforts to solve the problem(s) and issue(s) with the ADB operations department including Resident Mission

concerned?

Yes. If YES, please provide the following: when, how, by whom, and with whom the efforts were made. Please describe any response the

complainants may have received from or any actions taken by ADB.

No

F. Optional Information

1. What is the complainants’ desired outcome or remedy for the complaint?

2. Anything else you would like to add?

Name of the person who completed this form: ______________

Signature: ______________ Date: ______________

Please send the complaint, by mail, fax, e-mail, or hand delivery, or through any ADB Resident Mission, to the following:

Complaint Receiving Officer (CRO), Accountability Mechanism

ADB Headquarters, 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550, Philippines,

Telephone number: +63-2-6324444 local 70309, Fax: +63-2-6362086,

E-mail: [email protected]

of 9

COMPLAINT RECEIPT CONFIRMATION NOTICE (TEMPLATE)

To: [ADDRESS]

From: [ADDRESS]

Subject: Complaint Receipt Confirmation Notice

Dear [DP’s NAME],

This is to confirm that your complaint has been received by the Grievance Redress Group and

was registered at the logbook under # dated of [DATE].

The nature of the complaint is the following: [DESCRIPTION OF THE NATURE OF THE

COMPLAINT]

The Grievance Redress Group shall review and address your complaint within fifteen (15) days

upon the date of the receipt of the complaint. Please note that we will be conducting GRG

meetings to review your complaint and your participation during these meetings will be

required. The Local Focal Person [NAME] shall contact you with further details.

Sincerely,

[NAME]

[POSITION]

of 9

GRIEVANCE REGISTRATION LOGBOOK

Project___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Grievance Focal Location___________________________________________________________________________________________

Grievance Focal Person____________________________________________________________________________________________

A Inquiry, clarification, suggestion, request

B Complaint regarding alleged breach of the SPS 2009 or Public Communication Policy 2011

C Allegation of fraud or corruption

IR Involuntary Resettlement

ENV Environment

GRIEVANCE REGISTRATION LOG BOOK

Grievance

No Date Name

Address,

telephone

Type (A, B,C)

& nature of

Grievance

(SOC or ENV)

Location of

impact

(village

name, KM

Chainage)

Grievance Summary DP’s Signature

of 9

PROTOCOL FORM FOR THE GRG MEETING (TEMPLATE)

GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE MEETING

Project:

Date:

Venue:

Participants:

Agenda:

Summary of discussions:

No Agenda / Subject of

discussion

Complainant Name,

Location, Phone

Content / Comments Proposals for

resolution

1

2

3

4

5

of 9

SNAG LIST EXAMPLE

Please record issues which are not grievances (as yet) such as community request for some improvements, request for temporary access to the

field, request for information etc.

PROJECT________________________________________________SNAG LIST as of (Date)

Person/s handling the issue:

No DATE VILLAGE /DP NAME

Km/CHAINA

GE SNAG DESCRIPTION REMARKS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

of 9

PROJECTS GRIEVANCES SUMMARY (TEMPLATE)

YEAR: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

1 Theme 1

Number of new complaints registered

for reporting month

Number of complaints resolved locally by GRG/PIU/

Consultant/ local government/etc.

Number of complaints submitted to court/ ADB AM/,

bypassing project level GRM

Total number of complaints registered in all Grievance

Logs

SUBTOTAL

2) Theme 2

Number of new complaints registered for reporting

month

Number of complaints resolved locally by GRG/PIU/

Consultant/local government/etc.

Number of complaints submitted to court/ ADB AM/,

bypassing project level GRM Total number of complaints registered in all Grievance

Logs:

SUBTOTAL

of 9

3) Theme 3

Number of new complaints registered for reporting

month

Number of complaints resolved locally by

GRGs/PIU/Consultant/local government/etc.

Number of complaints submitted to court/ADB AM/, by-

passing project level GRM

Total number of complaints registered in all Grievance

Logs

SUBTOTAL

GRAND TOTALS

Grievance Redress Mechanism for Rural Road Improvement Project


What is grievance mechanism?

► Grievance mechanism is a method or process to resolve the complaints from affected people of RRIP. This mechanism is used by Provincial GRM Committee. The objective of mechanism for resolving the complaints as soon as possible in local level for negotiating this process. If this mechanism could not resolve, the transparent methods is used for continuing these complaints.

When we can use the grievance mechanism?

► You can submit grievance, if you were affected by RRIP and did not satisfied with supporting from committee or compensation or any agreements for losing your properties.

Where we can submit the grievance mechanism?

► You can grievance in writing letter to provincial committee or working group of committee in your commune/village. You also can request local NGO for supporting.

► There are 03 stages of grievance mechanism for resolving or redressing RRIP. These stages are presented on the pictures next page.

If in these 03 stages can’t resolve the grievances, you can submit the complaint to provincial court.

If, we still not satisfy?

►If you are not satisfied/agree with decisions from all stages of grievance mechanism, you can submit or call to Asian Development Bank (ADB) office in Cambodia. Box: 2436 Phnom Penh

Tel: 023 215 806

Where we can additional information on our right for receiving

supporting or compensation of RRIP?

►Booklet and project activities awareness of RRIP were showed of the right agreement, supporting or compensation.

► If you did not have booklet or did not attend in project awareness, please request from commune chiefs of team of RRIP (PDRD-ADB).

Where we can receive additional information of grievance mechanism?

► Call to provincial GRM committee

► Contact with PDRD. Tel: ……………

► Contact to your commune office. Tel: ……..


Stage 1: Commune Office (15 days)

Stage 1

The affected people are un-satisfy with any properties lost or damaged. They can submit the complaint to Commune Council within 15 days

Stage 2

Stage 2: District Office (15 days)

If Commune Council can’t redress or resolve, you can submit this complaint to District Council, within 15 days

Stage 3: Provincial GRM Committee (30 days)

Stage 3

If District Council can’t redress or resolve, you can submit this complaint to Provincial GRM Committee, within 30 days

Stage 4

Stage 4: Provincial Court តុ��រេខត�

If Provincial GRM Committee can’t redress or resolve, you can submit this complaint to : Provincial Court

Provincial GRM Committee Members: Provincial Hall, PDRD, Commune Council, District Council, NGOs, and Concerning Provincial Departments

សលេខត�

សលឃំុ

សល្រស�ក

1

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION- CONSULTATION GUIDE QUESTIONS

FOR THE RRIP II - ADDITIONAL ROADS

A. Objectives of the FGD/ Consultation Meetings

Focus Group Discussion (FGD) is one of the participatory methods being used when communicating with the key stakeholders in the project area. It helps to inform the participants, consult and engage then in a meaningful process. It also encourages the participants to express their views or opinions and/or raise suggestions that could be used in the design, implementation and operation & maintenance of the projects.

1. Procedures and Pointers in Conducting FGD / Consultation Meetings

1.1 Physical Arrangements and Consideration The number of participants should be manageable for the FGD Facilitator to handle.

Encourage the participants to express their views and/ or engage them in a meaningful consultation. If necessary, conduct separate consultation for women.

Speak language that the participants could understand very well. The voice of the facilitator should be loud enough for all the participants to hear.

Have eye contact with the participants (and the person sharing). Be sensitive to the time (the participants have many things to do); consider the time most

preferred or convenient for a particular group of participants (such as women/ mothers; business people, etc.). Be culturally sensitive to the time and day of the FGD. Limit FGDs to at least 45 minutes to 1 hour only.

2. FGD Process

Start the FGD by explaining the objective/purpose. Participants introduce each one, including the FGD facilitator. Assign an FGD documenter to assist the facilitator; including taking pictures. Don’t record or video the FGD/ conversation without asking permission. Be culturally sensitive, including use of language/ words that may not be appropriate. Set a schedule ahead of time; inform the community/ district leaders. Conversation should be focused on the objectives; facilitator should have the skills of

redirecting or trafficking conversation which are not relevant to the topic. Facilitator should be mindful of participants who dominate the group and would always

want to talk. Ensure that all participants have expressed their respective views or participate actively in the discussion.

Wrap-up the salient points before the session ends, and express thanks to the participants for the time and active participation.

B. FGD / Consultation Meetings’ Guide Questions

The Facilitators will start by introducing herself/ himself (or the members in the Team). Mention the name, agency/ position of the people in the team.

Mention the purpose of the Meeting. Note: Some of the participatory approaches in conducting consultation and participation are focus group discussion (FGD), meetings, public consultation/ community forums, etc.

Stakeholders may include project beneficiaries, affected population/ HHs, women,business sector, and other groups (who will be directly affected and/ or benefited by the project); community leaders, local government authorities, government

Appendix K

2

agencies, NGOs, and other groups with interest on the project (including road users/ commuters, school children and teachers, vendors, drivers, etc.).

C. Purpose:

1. To inform the participants about the Project (RRIP II- additional roads); implementing agency and sources of funds / development partners (ADB, etc.), project impact/ outcome and outputs; design features (length and width of the proposed road improvement, etc.), project implementation duration, etc.

2. To gather information from the participants on the project impacts (i.e. advantages and/ or disadvantages, if any), their worries or concerns, if any; and suggestions (or recommendations).

3. To encourage the participants to express their views on the project, increase their level of understanding about the project, and ensure that their questions are answered properly (with accurate information).

Suggested Questions (specifically for the affected persons, and project beneficiaries):

Listed below are some questions that could be asked during the FGD. Additional questions (not included in the list below) may be asked during the process.

[

The sequence in asking the questions may be changed. The FGD facilitator should be a very good listener (in addition to facilitating skills); should know the appropriate sequence in asking relevant questions to ensure smooth flow of the discussion. The people being consulted should be allowed to voice out or express their views openly; ensure that their views/ concerns raised are properly/ correctly documented (this will be included in the Minutes of the Meetings).

1. Do you know about the proposed roads for improvement project (RRIP II- additional roads) that will be implemented in your commune/ village?

How did you learn about the project? Who is the source of information?

What information have you learned about the project?

Note: The Facilitator will provide additional information about the project, project scope/ outcome, design, etc.; implementing agency; sources of funding, etc.

2. What do you think are the positive impacts of the improving the roads in your village/ commune? Request the participants to explain.

3. What are your worries or concerns related to the road improvement project?

What suggestions could you give to address the concerns raised?

Note: The facilitator will provide response or explanation about the proposed project, mitigation measures to address potential negative impacts, including ADB safeguard policy, etc.

4. Should you have complaints related to the project, how and to whom would you lodge the complaint?

Are you aware of the Grievance Redress Mechanism?

Note: The Facilitator should explain the purpose of the GRM, the GRM process, whom and how to lodge complaints, etc.

5. In your opinion, how you and your household members could maximize the benefits from the road improvement project?

3

During the road construction

After the road project has been completed?

Open Forum (the facilitators will encourage the participants to ask questions, clarify, and share their views).

Question: Do you still have other comments, and / or suggestions?

FGD proceedings will be documented through minutes, attendance sheet and pictures.

Note: Additional Questions Asked for specific Audience to gather additional information needed for the report/ social impact assessment.

1) What is the main occupation of the people living in the area? 2) What are other sources of households’ income? 3) Is the road flooded during rainy season? What are your suggestions to address this

problem or concern? 4) During construction, contractors will hire local people in civil works including women. Will

there be local people, and women interested to work in order to earn additional income? 5) What do you think will be the positive impacts of the project or how you/ your HHs will be

benefited? 6) Do you have other concerns or suggestions, or worries related to the proposed road

improvement If yes, please feel free to express? What suggestions could you give to address your concerns/ problems raised so that we could discuss with the project team?

Note: The facilitator should explain clearly to the participants’ information about the project; safeguard measures, gender mainstreaming, and other relevant information; GRM process and how to lodge complaints, if any; etc.

42334-014: Rural Roads Improvement Project II · Project Number: 42334-014 April 2020 Cambodia:...

Documents

Transcript of 42334-014: Rural Roads Improvement Project II · Project Number: 42334-014 April 2020 Cambodia:...