4102 NDT Notes.pdf

download 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

of 14

Transcript of 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    1/14

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    2/14

    Used to locate cracks,porosity, and other

    defects that break the

    surface of a material

    and have enoughvolume to trap and

    hold the penetrantmaterial. Liquidpenetrant testing is

    used to inspect large

    areas very efficiently

    and will work on most

    nonporous materials.

    Used to inspectferromagnetic

    materials (those that

    can be magnetized)

    for defects that resultin a transition in the

    magnetic permeabilityof a material.Magnetic particle

    inspection can detect

    surface and near

    surface defects.

    Used to locate surfaceand subsurface defects

    in many materials

    including metals,

    plastics, and wood.Ultrasonic inspection

    is also used tomeasure the thicknessof materials and

    otherwise characterize

    properties of material

    based on sound

    velocity andattenuation

    measurements.

    Used to detect surfaceand near-surface flaws

    in conductive

    materials, such as the

    metals. Eddy currentinspection is also used

    to sort materials basedon electricalconductivity and

    magnetic

    permeability, and

    measures the

    thickness of thinsheets of metal and

    nonconductive

    coatings such as paint.

    Used to inspect almostany material for

    surface and subsurface

    defects. X-rays can

    also be used to locatesand measures internal

    features, confirm thelocation of hiddenparts in an assembly,

    and to measure

    thickness of materials.

    Main Advantages

    Large surface areas or

    large volumes of

    parts/materials can beinspected rapidly and

    at low cost.

    Parts with complex

    geometry are routinelyinspected.

    Indications are

    produced directly on

    surface of the part

    providing a visualimage of the

    discontinuity.

    Equipment investment

    is minimal.

    Large surface areas of

    complex parts can be

    inspected rapidly.

    Can detect surface andsubsurface flaws.

    Surface preparation is

    less critical than it is

    in penetrantinspection.

    Magnetic particle

    indications are

    produced directly onthe surface of the part

    and form an image of

    the discontinuity.

    Equipment costs are

    relatively low.

    Depth of penetration

    for flaw detection or

    measurement issuperior to other

    methods.

    Only single sided

    access is required.

    Provides distanceinformation.

    Minimum part

    preparation is

    required.

    Method can be usedfor much more than

    just flaw detection.

    Detects surface and

    near surface defects.

    Test probe does not

    need to contact thepart.

    Method can be used

    for more than flaw

    detection.

    Minimum partpreparation is

    required.

    Can be used to inspect

    virtually all materials.

    Detects surface and

    subsurface defects.

    Ability to inspectcomplex shapes and

    multi-layered

    structures withoutdisassembly.

    Minimum part

    preparation is

    required.

    Disadvantages

    Detects only surface

    breaking defects.

    Surface preparation is

    critical as

    contaminants canmask defects.

    Requires a relatively

    smooth and nonporous

    surface.

    Post cleaning isnecessary to remove

    Only ferromagnetic

    materials can be

    inspected.

    Proper alignment of

    magnetic field anddefect is critical.

    Large currents are

    needed for very large

    parts.

    Requires relatively

    Surface must be

    accessible to probe

    and couplant.

    Skill and training

    required is moreextensive than other

    technique.

    Surface finish and

    roughness caninterfere with

    inspection.

    Only conductive

    materials can be

    inspected.

    Ferromagnetic

    materials requirespecial treatment to

    address magnetic

    permeability.

    Depth of penetrationis limited.

    Flaws that lie parallel

    Extensive operator

    training and skill

    required.

    Access to both sides

    of the structure isusually required.

    Orientation of the

    radiation beam to non-

    volumetric defects iscritical.

    Field inspection of

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    3/14

    chemicals.

    Requires multiple

    operations under

    controlled conditions.

    Chemical handlingprecautions are

    necessary (toxicity,

    fire, waste).

    smooth surface.

    Paint or other

    nonmagnetic

    coverings adversely

    affect sensitivity.

    Demagnetization and

    post cleaning isusually necessary.

    Thin parts may bedifficult to inspect.

    Linear defects

    oriented parallel to the

    sound beam can go

    undetected.

    Reference standardsare often needed.

    to the inspectionprobe coil winding

    direction can go

    undetected.

    Skill and training

    required is moreextensive than other

    techniques.

    Surface finish and

    roughness mayinterfere.

    Reference standards

    are needed for setup.

    thick section can betime consuming.

    Relatively expensive

    equipment investment

    is required.

    Possible radiation

    hazard for personnel.

    Penetrant

    Testing

    Magnetic Particle

    Testing

    Ultrasonic

    Testing

    Eddy Current

    Testing

    Radiographic

    Testing

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    4/14

    NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING

    IN THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY

    How essential is nondestructive testing (NDT) to

    airplanes?

    In the aerospace industry, as with other transportation

    industries, NDT can make the difference between lifeand death. Aircraft components are inspected before

    they are assembled into the aircraft and then they are

    periodically inspected throughout their useful life.Aircraft parts are designed to be as light as possible

    while still performing their intended function. This

    generally means that components carry very high loadsrelative to their material strength and small flaws can

    cause a component to fail. Since aircraft are cycled(loaded and unloaded) as they fly, land, taxi, and

    pressurize the cabin, many components are prone tofatigue cracking after some length of time. If you are unfamiliar with the term "fatigue cracking" think

    about what happens when you bend a paper clip or piece of wire back and forth ...eventually it will

    break. Even parts that are loaded well below the level that causes them to deform can develop fatiguecracks after being cycled for a long time. This is what happens in aircraft. After they are used for a

    while, fatigue cracks start growing in some of their parts. Cracking can also occur due to other things

    like a lightning strike. Aircraft have some protection against lightning strikes but occasionally theyoccur and can results in cracks forming at the strike location like the one shown in the picture.

    Another problem that aircraft have is that they are under the constant attack of corrosion. When an

    aircraft lands and the door is opened, the inside of the plane often fills with warm moist air. When the

    plane takes flight, and reaches altitude, the skin of the aircraft becomes very cold due to the temperature

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    5/14

    of the outside air. This cause the moisture held by the air inside the cabin to condense on the inside of

    the aircraft skin. The water will collect at low areas and serve as the electrolyte needed for corrosion to

    occur.

    The good news is that aircraft are designed to withstand a certain amount of damage from

    cracking and corrosion without cause for concern, and NDT inspectors are trained to find the

    damage before it becomes a major problem.The rigorous process used to design aircraft either allow

    for a certain amount of damage to occur before a part fails, or in many cases, a part can fail completelyand performance of the aircraft will not be affected. The job of the NDT inspector is to find the damage

    while it is within acceptable limits.

    What kind of NDT techniques are used to ensure the safety of the airplane?

    Over 80 percent of the inspections done to an aircraft are visual inspections. At regular intervals

    inspectors look at various component of the aircraft for signs of damage. During heavy maintenancework, much of the interior of the aircraft is stripped out so inspectors can look for damage on the inside

    surface of the fuselage. However, not all areas of the aircraft can be accessed for visual inspection and

    not all damage can be detected by visual means. This is were NDT plays a critical role in thoroughly

    inspecting airplanes.

    NDT methods allow inspectors to inspect areas of the plane that would

    otherwise be uninspectable without disassembling structure to gainaccess to the internal areas. NDT methods also allow inspectors to

    detect damage that is too small to be detected by visual means. Eddy

    current and ultrasonic inspection methods are used extensively to

    locate tiny cracks that would otherwise be undetectable. Thesetechniques are also used to measure the thickness of the aircraft skin

    from the outside and detect metal thinning from corrosion on the

    inside surface of the skin. X-ray techniques are used to find defects

    buried deep within the structure and to locate areas were water haspenetrated into certain structure. Obviously, this task requires trained

    professionals who are capable of performing a variety of different

    NDT techniques to get a complete and accurate status of the airplane.

    There is no question that the success of the airplane industry is

    dependent on NDT. Without NDT, the cost of maintaining and flying

    in airplanes would increase dramatically, while the safety of flyingwould decrease. When people step into an airplane they trust that it

    will get them to their destination with as little turbulence as possible.

    NDT plays a vital role in keeping air travel one of the safest modes of transportation.

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    6/14

    BRIDGE INSPECTION

    The US has 578,000 highway bridges, which are the lifelines of US commerce. The average life span ofhighway bridges is about 70 years and the majority of

    bridges currently in use were built after 1945. However,

    significant environmental damage requiring repair typically

    occurs before the average bridge reaches mid-life.Corrosion, cracking and other damage can all affect a

    bridge's load carrying capacity. Therefore, all of theelements that directly affect performance of the bridge

    including the footing, substructure, deck, and

    superstructure must be periodically inspected or monitored.

    Visual inspection is the primary NDE method used toevaluate the condition of the majority of the nation's

    highway bridges. Inspectors periodically (about every two

    years) pay each bridge a visit to assess its condition. However, it is not uncommon for a fisherman,canoeist and other passerby to alert officials to major damage that may have occurred between

    inspections.

    The potential penalties for ineffective inspection of bridges canbe very severe. Instances of major bridge collapse are very rare,

    but the results are truly catastrophic. The collapse of the Silver

    Bridge in 1967 resulted in loss of 47 lives. The bridge connected

    Point Pleasant, West Virginia and Gallipolis,Ohio over the OhioRiver. The cost of this disaster was 175 million dollars but some

    experts estimate the same occurrence today would cost between

    2.1 and 5.6 billion dollars. Furthermore, these cost figures do nottake into account factors such as loss of business resulting from

    loss of access or detours, the cost resulting from blockage of a

    major river shipping channel, and potential environmental

    damage due to hazardous materials being transported over the bridge at the time of collapse.

    The consequences of ineffective bridge inspection are usually not as severe as those at Silver Bridge.

    However, repair and retrofit costs on bridges represent a very significant portion of a state's

    transportation budget. In the future, replacement of a bridge will become an increasingly unattractivealternative. Growing construction costs, increased losses due to traffic disruption during repair or

    replacement, and continuing tight budgets will force life extension to be the only viable alternative for

    our aging bridges.

    Fatigue cracking and corrosion will become

    increasingly important considerations as we go

    beyond the 75 year life expectancy and currentvisual inspection techniques will not suffice. The life

    extension approach will require increased use of

    NDE in a coordinated effort to obtain reliability

    assurance for these structures. NDE techniques suchas magnetic particle inspection and ultrasonic

    inspection are being used with greater frequency.

    One of the newer NDE technologies being used is

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    7/14

    acoustic emission (AE) monitoring. Some bridges are being fitted with AE instruments that listen to the

    sounds that a bridge makes. These sophisticated systems can detect the sound energy produced when a

    crack grows and alert the inspector to the cracks presence. Sensors can be permanently fixed to the

    bridge and the data transmitted back to the lab so that continuous bridge condition monitoring ispossible. The image provided here shows field engineers installing an AE monitoring system on the lift

    cables of the Ben Franklin Bridge in Philadelphia, PA

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    8/14

    Pipeline Inspection

    In the United States, millions of miles of pipeline carrying everythingfrom water to crude oil. The pipe is vulnerable to attack by internal

    and external corrosion, cracking, third party damage and

    manufacturing flaws. If a pipeline carrying water springs a leak

    bursts, it can be a problem but it usually doesn't harm theenvironment. However, if a petroleum or chemical pipeline leaks, it

    can be a environmental disaster. More information on recent USpipeline accidents can be found at the,National Transportation

    Safety Board's Internet site. In an attempt to keep pipelines operating

    safely, periodic inspections are performed to find flaws and damage before they become cause for

    concern.

    When a pipeline is built, inspection personnel may use visual, X-

    ray, magnetic particle, ultrasonic and other inspection methods to

    evaluate the welds and ensure that they are of high quality. Theimage to the left show two NDT technicians setting up equipment

    to perform an X-ray inspection of a pipe weld. These inspections

    are performed as the pipeline is being constructed so gaining accessthe inspection area is not problem. In some areas like Alaska,

    sections of pipeline are left above ground like shown above, but in

    most areas they get buried. Once the pipe is buried, it is undesirable

    to dig it up for any reason.

    So, how do you inspect a buried pipeline?

    Have you ever felt the ground move under your feet? If you're standing in New

    York City, it may be the subway train passing by. However, if you're standing inthe middle of a field in Kansas it may be a pig passing under your feet. Huh???

    Engineers have developed devices, called pigs, that are sent through the buried

    pipe to perform inspections and clean the pipe. If you're standing near a pipeline,vibrations can be felt as these pigs move through the pipeline. The pigs are about

    the same diameter of the pipe so they range in size from small to huge. The pigs

    are carried through the pipe by the flow of the liquid or gas and can travel and

    perform inspections over very large distances. They may be put into the pipe lineon one end and taken out at the

    other. The pigs carry a small

    computer to collect, store andtransmit the data for analysis.

    In 1997, a pig set a world record when it completed a

    continuous inspection of the Trans Alaska crude oilpipeline, covering a distance of 1,055 km in one run.

    Click here to read more about this record setting

    inspection.

    Pigs use several nondestructive testing methods toperform the inspections. Most pigs use a magnetic flux

    leakage method but some also use ultrasound to

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    9/14

    perform the inspections. The pig shown to the left and below uses magnetic flux leakage. A strong

    magnetic field is established in the pipe wall using either magnets or by injecting electrical current into

    the steel. Damaged areas of the pipe can not support as much magnetic flux as undamaged areas so

    magnetic flux leaks out of the pipe wall at the damaged areas. An array of sensor around thecircumference of the pig detects the magnetic flux leakage and notes the area of damage. Pigs that use

    ultrasound, have an array of transducers that emits a high frequency sound pulse perpendicular to the

    pipe wall and receives echo signals from the inner surface and the outer surface of the pipe. The toolmeasures the time interval between the arrival of a reflected echos from inner surface and outer surface

    to calculate the wall thickness.

    On some pipelines it is easier to use remote visual inspection equipment to assess the condition of thepipe. Robotic crawlers of all shapes and sizes have been developed to navigate the pipe. The video

    signal is typically fed to a truck where an operator reviews the images and controls the robot.

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    10/14

    Rail Inspection

    One of the major problems that railroads have facedsince the earliest days is the prevention of service

    failures in track. As is the case with all modes of high-

    speed travel, failures of an essential component can have

    serious consequences. The North American railroadshave been inspecting their most costly infrastructure

    asset, the rail, since the late 1920's. With increasedtraffic at higher speed, and with heavier axle loads in the

    1990's, rail inspection is more important today than it has

    ever been. Although the focus of the inspection seems

    like a fairly well-defined piece of steel, the testingvariables present are significant and make the inspection

    process challenging.

    Rail is manufactured in different weights; there aredifferent rail conditions (wear, corrosion etc) present;

    there are a significant number of potential defects

    possible; and the task has to be performed with somespeed to reliably inspect the thousands of miles of track

    stretching across the land. Sperry Rail Service, one of the

    country's leading inspector of railroad tracks, has been

    using specialized test equipment mounted on self-propelled rail cars for over seventy years to protect the

    safety of passengers and freight. This information

    provides a brief look at rail inspection.

    The history of railroading is rooted in the production of

    the first metal rails near the city of Sheffield, England in 1776. The rail improved the transportation of

    materials in industries such as mining. In 1803 the first railroad intended for public use was opened foroperation between the London docks and Croyden. This first railway, the Surrey Iron Railway, offered a

    smoother ride than a wagon, but offered no real advantage in speed since draft animals were used for

    locomotion. However, the first steam locomotive was soon to arrive on the scene. In 1804, a steam

    locomotive pulled a train of cars carrying several tons of ore for the iron works at Merthyr Tydfil inSouth Wales. The first American locomotive, the Best Friend of Charleston, was placed in operation on

    the South Carolina Railroad in 1831.

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    11/14

    The rails have evolved from cast iron plates to specially alloyed steels, which are rolled to a standardshape and specially heat-treated to obtain the desired properties. The figures above show the progression

    of rail development. Present day steel rails are vastly superior to their predecessors in both strength and

    wear qualities, however defects still develop. The heavy loads and high speed of today's trains can causerails to fail in service unless regular inspections are performed.

    Rail inspections were initially performed solely by visual means. Of course,

    visual inspections will only detect external defects and sometimes the subtle

    signs of large internal problems. The need for a better inspection method

    became a high priority because of a derailment at Manchester, NY in 1911, inwhich 29 people were killed and 60 seriously injured. In the U.S. Bureau of

    Safety's (now the National Transportation Safety Board) investigation of theaccident, a broken rail was determined to be the cause of the derailment. The

    bureau established that the rail failure was caused by a defect that was entirely

    internal and probably could not have been detected by visual means. Thedefect was called a transverse fissure (example shown on the left). The railroads began investigating the

    prevalence of this defect and found transverse fissures were widespread.

    In 1915, the Bureau of Standards began research to determine if magnetic testing could be used to detect

    transverse fissures. The inspection technique involved passing a magnetizing solenoid along the rail to

    establish a flux in the rail. Flux leakage caused by a defect was detected with search coils. The techniquewas successful in the laboratory but was unable to differentiate between defects and non-relevant rail

    features in the field.

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    12/14

    In 1923, Dr. Elmer Sperry, started to develop and build a

    rail inspection car with the capability of detecting

    transverse fissures in railroad rails. In 1927 Sperry built an

    inspection car (shown on the right) under contract with theAmerican Railway Association. The small flatbed in front

    of the cab contained the inspection equipment. The

    operator and recording devices were housed in the cab.

    In 1928, a Sperry built inspection car, SRS 102, was testing

    rail on the Wabash Railway in Montpelier, Ohio. The

    inspection technique Sperry used established a strongmagnetic field in the rail by passing a large amount of low voltage current through it. A pair of search

    coils, fixed at a constant distance from the rail, detected any changes in the magnetic field around the

    rail. This magnetic induction flux leakage technique became the foundation of early rail inspection.

    This drawing on the left shows the basic operation ofrail inspection using the induction method. Brushes are

    used to contact the rail and "inject" electrical current.

    The current creates a strong magnetic field in the rail.Where there is a defect in the rail, the steel material

    will not support magnetic flux and some of the flux is

    forced out of the part. The sensing coil detects a changein the magnetic field and the defect indication is

    recorded on the strip chart. Computers are now being

    used to record and evaluate the date.

    Unfortunately, transverse fissures are not the only types

    of defects found in rail. Other manufacturing and service-related defects that can occur includeinclusions, seams, shelling, and corrosion. Fatigue cracks can initiate from these defects, as well as

    normal features of the rail such as bolt-holes. If these defects go undetected, they can lead to rail headand web separations. Many of these defects are not detectable with the flux leakage method because the

    flaws run parallel to the magnet flux lines or the flaws are too far away from the sensing coils to detect.

    The induction technique inspects mainly the railhead.

    To complement the flux leakage method, and detect additional flaw types, ultrasonic inspection has

    become common. High-frequency sound is transmitted into the metal rail and reflections from rail jointsand surface conditions, as well as internal defects, are displayed on a screen or cause movement of a pen

    on a recording tape. Both normal- and angle-beam techniques are used, as are both pulse-echo and pitch-

    catch techniques. The different transducer arrangements offer different inspection capabilities. Manualcontact testing is done to evaluate small sections of rail but the ultrasonic inspection has been automated

    to allow inspection of large amounts of rail, like the electromagnetic technique previously discussed.The first all-ultrasonic inspection car was introduced in 1959. This car was developed specifically to

    meet the needs of the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA).

    Fluid filled wheels or sleds are often used to couple the transducers to the rail. Sperry Rail Services has,

    over the years, developed and made use of Roller Search Units (RSU's) comprising a combination of

    different transducer angles to achieve the best inspection possible. A schematic of an RSU is shownbelow.

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    13/14

    At Sperry, there are two primary inspection units. The SperryRail Detector Car, referred to as the "big" car, uses both

    ultrasonic and electromagnetic technologies to identify defects.

    The inspection equipment on a Sperry test car is carried in a

    carriage slung between the axles.

    The Hi-Rail trucks

    currently use only

    ultrasonics becausethe electromagnet

    equipment is too large

    for this vehicle. The detector car will test rail between 6.5 and13 miles per hour. However, higher speed units are in

    development.

    The data from the inspection

    equipment is fed to the operatorinside the car. A picture of the

    operator station is shown on the right. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)

    rules require that any indication considered suspect by the test equipment onthe test car are hand verified immediately. This leads to a stop-start test mode.

    When the operator sees something on the tape indicating a problem, he uses a

    buzzer signal system to tell the driver up front to stop. The car then backs upto the point of examination where the operator gets out to hand test the rail

    with an ultrasonic test set mounted on the rear of the car. If a defect isconfirmed, it is marked and a railroad work crew following the Sperry car will change the rail. If they

    can't get to it right away, the section of track is assigned a slow order (slower speed) until the crew canrepair it. The amount of rail being tested can be increased by the use of chase cars following the testing

    vehicles. The chase cars will receive a radioed signal of the test being done by the lead truck and will

    stop to do the necessary hand testing. This elimination of the need to back up to hand test, allows thetesting vehicle to move forward, continuously testing, with the results being sent and recorded for

    examination by the chase car.

  • 8/10/2019 4102 NDT Notes.pdf

    14/14

    Wire Rope (Cable) Inspection

    Most skiers and snowboarders rate ski resorts by their average powder base and theoverall quality of the slopes. Few likely give serious consideration to the safety of

    chair lifts at their favorite mountains. It is likely, however, that many have looked

    up at that relatively small cable that they are dangling from high in the air and

    hoped that someone had check to see that it was in good working condition.Luckily, ski resort operators and governing authorities perform regular inspections

    and maintenance of chair lifts to ensure passenger safety . One of the components

    that gets close scrutiny is the cable.

    Wire rope or cable is made by weaving many

    individual wires together to produce a product that is both strong andflexible. Wire rope is used in many safety critical applications in

    addition to chair lift and gondola systems. Some of these applications

    include hoisting systems, such as cranes and winches; guy wires used intall antennas and towers; and mooring lines of oil drilling platforms at

    sea. A cable failure in one of these applications could have very serious

    consequences.

    All wire rope eventually wears out making periodic inspections necessarythroughout the service life of the rope. Wire rope is prone to damage and wear due

    to abrasion, fatigue, corrosion, and improper handling. NDT personnel look for

    localized flaws or loss of metallic cross-sectional area using a variety of inspectionmethods. The least sophisticated method is visual inspection. Inspector simply look

    for broken strands, wear and corrosion on the surface of the cable. However, for a

    more thorough evaluation, a number of instruments have been developed that allow

    inspectors to assess the internal areas of the cable.

    One of the more widely used of

    these instruments uses magnetism

    to inspect the rope. The inspectioninstrument is placed around the

    wire rope and moved along the rope or the rope is

    pulled through the instrument. Strong permanentmagnets or electromagnets are used to create a strong

    magnetic field within the rope. The rope is said to be

    magnetically saturated because it is caring all the

    magnet flux that it possibly can. In areas where the ropeis damaged, it can not support as much of the magnet

    flux and some of it "leaks" out of the rope. Sensors in

    the inspection head detect the magnetic flux leakagecaused by the internal or external defects in the rope.

    Defects as small as 0.05 % of the rope's cross-sectional area can often be detected.