MEMORANDUM

ITEM: MASTERTON TOWN HALL

Date:

Subject:

To:

11 June 2019

Strengthening Options

PROJECT STEERING GROUP

ITEM:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This memo serves as an optioneering report on several strengthening and refurbishment options to assist

the Steering Group with making an informed recommendation to the Masterton District Council. The next

Councillors meeting is on 26 June 2019.

BACKGROUND

Scope - Stage One:

In order to gain robust cost estimating on several demolition and strengthening options the Steering Group

committed to engaging a consultant team and progressing conceptual designs in order better inform the

Quantity Surveyors estimations.

Xigo prepared Requests for Proposal (RFP) documents for several design consultants to price and

undertake Concept Design services for the following options;

• Option A - Demolition of All Buildings

o Complete demolition of existing buildings on the site.

• Option B - Complete Demolition with Façade Retainment/Propping

o The building’s façade (Perry Street and Chapel Street), are listed within the MDC District

Plan as having heritage value. Façades to be retained with propping.

o Remaining buildings demolished.

o Identification and documentation of salvageable items as desired by Masterton District

Council.

• Option C - Façade Propping, Strengthening of Municipal and Civil Defence Buildings (100%NBS),

and Demolition of Town Hall building

o Maintain both heritage façades and strengthen Municipal and Civil Defence buildings.

o Demolish main Auditorium (Town Hall) space.

o Design internal layout for replacement/alternative use i.e. open plan office

o Structural Engineer design options targeting 100%NBS.

The successful respondents to the RFP were; Silverwoods Architects (Architecture), LGE Consulting

(Structural Engineering), Stevenson and Turner (Building Services) and Rawlinsons (Quantity Surveyor).

ATTACHMENT 2404

MEMORANDUM

2

DESIGN CRITERIA AND ASSUMPTIONS

Option A:

The cost estimate assumes the full removal of the existing Town Hall structure, Municipal and Civil

Defence buildings and that the vacant lot to be returned to flat ground. Existing services are to be

terminated and covered.

Option B:

LGE have designed a propping solution based on an expected lifespan of 5 years. This design has been

considered with the demolition of the other structures. It relies on a temporary support structure, not one

that utilises existing structure, nor does it consider a new structure to be built behind.

Option C:

The scope of works provided to the Consultants were to provide a generic, open plan office space for a

single occupant to occupy the existing Municipal building footprint.

The QS advised early on in the process that the construction required to strengthening the existing

Municipal building structure could well be more expensive than to build a new structure altogether. It was

decided to conduct an exercise to be run in parallel to provide comparison for the;

Option C - Strengthening of existing MOB structure, and

Option C1 - Build new structure.

Rawlinsons used a square metre rate basis to calculate the new structure estimates.

Due to the change in the structural design target from 80% to 100%nbs, additional design work and

calculations were completed by LGE Consulting. This has resulted in higher degree of design quality to

that which would usually be undertaken for conceptual design. The design for the structural design

element of Option C is considered at Preliminary Stage level. This has provided for a more robust

estimate.

LGE has advised that the Council should be aware of the difference between how a strengthened building

compares to that of a new build in terms of NBS ratings. New buildings designed to be 100%nbs would

actually rate higher, in the range of 130-150%NBS, if they were to be evaluated post construction. A

strengthened building to 100%NBS will only ever be 100%NBS. The reasoning is complex and are to do

with several assumptions and factors of safety that are applied during the assessment of existing

structures that differ to newly designed elements that meet modern day standards. LGE are happy to

advise further on this should there be a need. For refurbished projects, like the proposed Option C, where

existing structural elements are proposed to be kept, the robustness and resilience of these are lesser

than that built to the current code and therefore can reduce the buildings performance during an

earthquake event.

405

MEMORANDUM

3

COST ESTIMATES

The funding available for the development was identified within Masterton’s Long-Term Plan with an

allocation of $15.5 million in Years 1-3.

See below summary table identifying the costs associated with each option:-

All options investigated can be achieved within the budget available.

Option C, is considered the more economical option available for retainment of the existing MOB structure

and historic façade when compared against option C1 with the new structure. The concept designs for

both two options have been tailored towards a high-end specification i.e. we have allowed for some ‘nice

to have’ elements and therefore, the design could be value engineered should there be a need to reduce

cost.

Should the project wish to take on ‘Green Building’ type initiatives such as GreenStar or NABORS ratings

then it is suggested an additional 5% be added to the overall estimates.

The estimated construction escalation costs are based on the construction phase commencing from June

2020. If the works are delayed until June 2021, or further, then the escalation costs provided would need

to be taken into account year on year.

Consultant fees are currently based on the project budget allocation of $15.5M. If the project value

changes then the consultants fee can be adjusted accordingly.

Within Horwath HTL’s demand and analysis report, their projections were based on assumptions that the

Municipal and Civil Defence Buildings were to remain, with a 1,500m2 Civic Centre development attached

to the buildings. The total construction value estimated by Howarth HTL was $20,000,000.00.

406

MEMORANDUM

4

Rawlinsons have provided a rough order of cost at $13,500,000.00 for an Event Centre development

based on their experience with other facilities within New Zealand.

Should the Council wish to proceed with an approach that an Event Centre is built behind the

strengthened MOB and existing façade we would need to revisit the concept design and prepare new

estimates.

407

MEMORANDUM

5

PROJECT PROGRAMME (Indicative)

We have prepared the attached programme with input on design timeframes from the design team. A

summary of this programme is shown below:

PROJECT RISKS

With any construction project comes an element of risk that needs to be evaluated and understood. At

this early stage in the project we have identified the following risks that could impact on cost and time

should they eventuate; this is not an exhaustive list;

Hazardous Materials (All Options):

FibreSafe NZ have completed a Demolition/Refurbishment Survey of the all the buildings that has

identified several areas of asbestos containing materials (ACM’s) and some minor areas of lead-based

paint. Removal of identified asbestos has been captured within the QS estimates. However, there may

well be areas that have not been identified that can only be uncovered during construction works;

unforeseen asbestos elements can place huge strain on project contingencies.

Programme (All Options):

The project programme is indicative only. Input on design timeframes has been made by all consultants

however, if the project were to proceed with an Event Centre additional design time may well be required.

The construction period is indicative and we have estimated 18months to be sufficient, the QS has used

this period as a guide to inform the P&G costs for a Main Contractor.

Structural Strengthening, 100NBS% (Options C & C1):

Destructive investigations of the existing structures are required to assertion its condition for refurbishment

under option C. Our estimates have assumed that they are of good condition.

Site Ground Conditions (Options B, C & C1):

Geotechnical ground assessments are required to confirm structural assumptions made at this Concept

Design stage. The project team are aware that there is contamination in the soils in at least three

locations. The QS have made allowances in the estimates to remove 700m3 of contaminated soils.

408

MEMORANDUM

6

Water Main Pressure Test (Option C & C1)

The water mains pressure is to be tested in future stages to confirm if it has enough capacity to supply fire

sprinklers without an onsite sprinkler pump. The costs for tests and installation of pump have been

captured within the Concept Design cost estimates.

Heightened Industry Activity

There is a considered boom within the industry at present and we have encountered projects whereby

estimates have been exceeded once tenders have returned from the market. The following need to be

considered;

• It is imperative that the design briefing from the Client is robust and unaltered ahead of the design

team commencing

• It is imperative that there are no scope changes made by the client and any stage post design

brief

• It is important that sufficient time is allowed for the design period as all too often we see designers

under-deliver on documentation because of impossible deadlines to meet client driven milestones.

Poor quality equals poor pricing and greater variations.

409

MEMORANDUM

7

SUMMATION – NEXT STEPS

We believe the options presented and the conceptual designs undertaken are of a good standard and the

estimates provided by the QS to be robust. There has been a good level of review and critique by all

members of the design team to test the estimates provided.

We intend to conduct a presentation for discussion at the next Steering Group meeting on 18 June 2019,

where it is proposed that the Steering Group make a decision to recommend either 1 or 2 options to the

MDC.

ATTACHMENTS

Silverwood Architects - Concept Design Report

Rawlinsons - Concept Design Estimate Report

Concept Design Documentation -

Silverwood Architects

LGE Consulting

Stevenson and Turner

410

CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT

PROJECT: Seismic Strengthening and

Office Fit-Out to MDC

Municipal Building

ADDRESS: 64 Chapel Street, Masterton

CLIENT: Masterton District Council

JOB NO: W1918

REV N0: Concept Design

DATE: 05/06/2019

411

CONTENTS

1 PREAMBLE .......................................................................................................................................... 3

2 DESIGN PROCESS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 3

3 DESIGN OUTCOMES .......................................................................................................................... 4

4 NEXT STEPS & PROJECT RISKS ...................................................................................................... 9

5 APPENDIX ......................................................................................................................................... 10

Prepared by:

Stephen Geuze

BAS, March (prof), NZRAB 5241

Registered Architect

412

1 PREAMBLE

The Masterton Town Hall facility located at 64 Chapel Street, Masterton includes the following

buildings; the 1915 Town Hall auditorium, 1915 Municipal building and 1985 Civil Defence building.

Masterton District Council have sought feasibility investigation into the following options for re

developing the existing Masterton Town Hall facility;

Option A: Demolish all buildings - Auditorium, Municipal & Civil Defence buildings.

Option B: Retain and prop the Municipal building façade, demolish all buildings.

Option C Strengthen: Seismic strengthen and refurbish the Municipal and Civil Defence

buildings, demolish the Auditorium building.

Option C1 Rebuild: Retaining and propping the Municipal building façade, demolition of all

the buildings behind, and rebuilding the equivalent area of the civil defence and municipal

buildings as a new building.

The following Concept Design Report has been prepared by Silverwood Architects for Option C;

including the proposed structural strengthening and refurbishment of the Municipal & Civil Defence

buildings together with the demolition of the Town Hall Auditorium.

The following Design Report must be read in conjunction with Silverwood Architects; Concept Design

Drawings and Outline Specification.

The following consultants have also provided documentation in support of Option C:

Stephenson & Turner: HVAC, Electrical, Hydraulic, Fire Design.

LEG Consulting Structural & Civil Engineers: Structural Strengthening Scheme 100% NBS.

Rawlinsons Quality Surveyors: Elemental Cost Estimate.

2 DESIGN PROCESS SUMMARY

2.1 Concept Design Brief – Option C:

Demolition of Auditorium – Complete demolition.

Seismic Strengthening - 100% NBS IL2 Seismic Strengthening to Municipal and Civil Defence

Buildings.

Refurbish Municipal and Civil Defence Base Buildings – refurbish existing municipal and civil

defence base buildings including exterior envelope, existing services & facilities.

New Generic ‘Open Plan’ Office Fit Out – new office fit-out to be designed on the

assumption that MDC will reoccupy the building(s) as a large single tenancy.

New Asphalt Carpark to Auditorium Footprint – new carpark to foot print of demolished

Auditorium.

413

2.2 Design Brief Assumptions – Option C:

Acoustic Performance – Upgrade building’s exterior glazing to double glazed units to reduce

road noise within building. New office fit-out to meet acoustic standards for open-plan office

space, including meeting spaces.

Thermal Performance – Insulate all existing exterior walls, install new insulated warm roof,

upgrade building’s exterior glazing to double glazed units, upgrade solar control to work

spaces (civil defence building).

Blank Rear External Walls - The new exterior walls along Grid 4 & Grid B have been designed

as blank two-way fire rated walls without glazing to provide MDC with flexibility in respect of

future project development on the site. These walls could be partially glazed with access to

natural light and view subject to further discussion with the MDC Project Team during the

preliminary design stage.

New Fire Protection System – New fire alarm system together with fire sprinkler protection.

Provision of Single Lift – A large single lift has been provided to meet accessible

requirements of NZ Building Code, option for an additional lift is feasible within Stair 2 if

required.

Asbestos-containing Material (ACM)- Presence and extent of ACM present on site has been

confirmed on site by Fibresafe NZ Ltd.

Lead Paint - Limited presence of lead based paint has been confirmed on site by Fibresafe

NZ Ltd.

Contaminated Site - Site contamination listed on SLUR register. Site investigation has been

differed to the preliminary design stage.

3 DESIGN OUTCOMES

3.1 Concept Design Outcomes

Concept Design - The design team has prepared the concept design based upon the concept

design brief and assumptions above including;

o Seismic strengthening scheme for upgrade to 100% NBS IL2.

o Architects base-build and fit-out design.

o Services Engineers preliminary HVAC and electrical design.

o Fire Engineers fire safety input.

Concept Design Cost Review - Rawlinson’s Quantity Surveyors have prepared a concept

design elemental estimate providing detail on project costs.

3.2 Concept Design Description

The concept design for the new office fit-out includes the provision of;

414

o Main public entry, foyer and reception spaces (entered from the primary town

square entrance).

o Public meeting spaces in close proximity to public entry (formal & informal).

o Accessible public toilet and parenting room.

o Accessible lift in close proximity to public entrance. Lift car size large enough to use

for trolleys for catering or accommodate a group of dignitaries using the lift

together.

o Separate staff entrances in close proximity to staff facilities (Chapel Street and

Lincoln Road entrances).

o Provision of amenities for staff to foster active lifestyle options including bike

storage, e-bike charging, showers & lockers.

o Provision of staff break, kitchen and toilet facilities at both levels located centrally

for all staff.

o Provision of separate cubicles for toilet facilities.

o Generic open plan offices spaces broken into large team spaces each with

supporting meeting rooms of various sizes, quiet refuge spaces, collaboration

spaces, resource and store areas.

o Provision of separate reception and offices for senior staff including the Mayor and

Chief Executive Officer.

o Provision of two key internal stairs.

o Provision of wet and dry services spaces for the buildings key environmental and

electrical services equipment.

o Provision of roof level services platform for new HVAC exterior units.

3.3 Concept Design Features

Town Square Entry – The town square main entry formally serving the Town Hall Auditorium

is to form the main public entry for the MDC offices. This improves the sense of arrival to the

building and encourages further pedestrian use of the town square.

Two main Vertical Circulation Spaces – the existing stairs and lift were all deemed

impractical/not viable to re-use. In their place two new double height spaces have been

proposed; one to the main public entry off the town square and the second to the proposed

staff entry off Chapel Street.

These double height spaces (floors, walls and ceilings) are to be refurbished consistent with

the original mosaic tiling, fret work, plaster ceilings, moulded cornices and architraves as

recorded within the original building plans. The new inserted feature stairs, mezzanine floors

and an exposed lift shaft are to be carefully designed as contemporary additions contrasting

the original architecture.

These spaces are designed as neutral places outside of the team office environments for

staff from different teams to greet one another as they pass, stand and chat or sit together

in casual seating spaces on the first floor mezzanine level.

415

These spaces also provide opportunities for reference to the Wairarapa’s cultural identity to

be developed in consultation with Rangitane and Ngati Kahungunu iwi groups.

It is also proposed to salvage the last known original 1915 steel framed window and look to

reinstate this in its original location back lit on the rear wall of Stair 2.

New CLT Stairs and Exposed Lift Shaft – The proposed new stairs are to be constructed of

Cross Laminated Timber with transparent glass balustrades. The CLT Air Stair is an innovative

NZ based engineered timber product providing a cost effective solution to creating an open

free spanning stair case. The new stair case is of a similar proportion to the original building,

however it will have a contemporary aesthetic.

The proposed lift is to be enclosed within a frameless steel & glass lift shaft, allowing the

inner workings of the new lift to be exposed to view.

416

New Solar Shading to Civil Defence Building - Existing civil defence building has roof hoods

over all exterior windows which have reached the end of their life span. Replacement with

aluminium louvers for solar shading is considered to be a practical and cost effective option

to avoid replacing the roof hoods.

Removal of secondary external entrance on Chapel Street – It is proposed to remove the

smaller secondary entrance on the Chapel Street elevation. This entrance was originally used

to access the council chambers, which are no longer used.

No provision for Council Chamber’s – It was deemed by the architect that it is not practical

to provide a new council chambers space within the existing municipal or civil defence

buildings. This is due to the existing buildings being too narrow to provide a council

chambers space of sufficient capacity for large council meetings with provision for public

seating.

Generic Open Plan Office Spaces – The proposed office spaces are to provide a balance of

open-plan and private spaces to create a range of working environments. The architect’s

concept design plans describe areas for team meetings, social & wellbeing spaces, staff

community spaces and spaces of refuge each contributing to creating a flexible, and modern

work environment.

Staff Facilities – Kitchen break rooms are designed to reflect ‘café hub’ type spaces, typical

of both modern government and private open-plan office spaces.

Weathertightness Resilience – Existing internal gutters are to be widened with new

overflows and new down pipes for increased capacity in extreme weather events. New

roofing to be installed with the quantity of roof penetrations to be reduced and consolidated

within plant room area. Existing low-pitch membrane roofs to be repitched as a minimum to

comply with NZ Building Code.

Ground Floor Separate Office Space – The current concept design provides a separate office

on the ground floor to the west end of the building. This space could be used by satellite

teams requiring temporary office space. Alternatively, this space with input from MDC in the

preliminary design phase can be redesigned to be incorporated within the larger facility.

417

3.4 Option C1 Rebuild - Retain and Prop Municipal Building Façade with new build behind.

Given the extent of demolition, propping and reconstruction of the Municipal Building’s

structure required to carry out ‘Option C Strengthening’. The design team recommended that

the cost of ‘Option C1 Rebuild’ was also investigated in order to assess against the ‘Option C

Strengthening’ scheme. This provides MCD with a cost comparison of rebuilding office space

new versus seismic strengthening with both options retaining the Municipal building façade and

providing the same area of office space.

Option C1 Rebuild – includes retaining and propping the Municipal building façade, demolition

of all the buildings behind, and rebuilding the equivalent area of the civil defence and municipal

buildings as a new building.

Rebuilding the Municipal & Civil Defence buildings (Option C1 Rebuild) provides a number of

opportunity’s & advantages over seismic strengthening to the existing structures as outlined

below;

A new building footprint can be redesigned to more efficient proportions which are better

suited to modern open plan office spaces. The existing building proportion limits the

opportunity for large open plan spaces due to its narrow building width.

Subject to site planning the building can be redesigned to access natural light and view to

the North & West in an efficient manner if the overall building width was increased.

New building construction has a higher level of acoustic and thermal performance.

New building construction has a higher level of durability with all elements specified

meeting current NZBC durability requirements. Existing buildings re-use existing structure

such as steel beams, timber joists and roof rafters which vary in condition.

New building structures generally have a higher capacity to withstand seismic events. Please

refer to the Structural Engineers documentation for comments in respect of the two options

with respect to how a strengthen building versus a new building performs in an earthquake.

New buildings typically has a lower risk profile for unforeseen items as they avoid making

good unforeseen damage or deterioration such as rotten timber, borer damaged timber,

corroded steel or concrete repairs. Please refer to the Quantity Surveyors documentation for

comment in respect of the two options and comparative costings and allowances.

While the Municipal building façade is of significant heritage value the remainder of the

building has little to no heritage value including the Civil Defence building.

418

4 NEXT STEPS & PROJECT RISKS

4.1 Next Steps – Preliminary Design Phase

Present the Concept Design to the Client Team – To date the concept design has been

prepared based on the design brief provided. Should Option C be selected as the viable

option the design team is to present the current concept design to the MDC project team

and receive feedback from MDC prior to proceeding with the preliminary design phase.

Occupation Strategy Review – MDC to confirm how they wish to re-occupy the building and

for what services and use. MDC project team to confirm staff numbers and teams to

reoccupy the facility.

Workplace Strategy Review – MDC to confirm their ‘work place’ strategy. Project team to

meet to assess existing concept design for proposed office fit-out and develop to suit MDC

occupation requirements.

Energy Efficiency Review – MDC to confirm ‘energy use’ strategy. Project team to meet and

confirm which strategies will be integrated within the building and allow the design team to

design accordingly.

Preliminary Design Refinement and Coordination – The building design including office

fitout is to be developed to reflect feedback from MDC.

Co-ordination Workshops – Design team workshops on-going through preliminary design

phase.

4.2 Project Risks – For Review, Monitoring and Mitigation

Site Ground Conditions – Geotechnical Investigation to be carried out as required for

structural & civil design certainty.

Site Contamination Investigation - Environmental Engineer to carryout site investigation

into extent of site contamination (listed on SLUR register) and quantify scope to

decontaminate the site.

Building Condition Investigation – Further destructive investigation to test the structural

integrity and condition of existing building fabric including structure (concrete, masonry,

reinforcing, timber framing, steel beams).

Water Main Pressure Test – Water main pressure to be tested to confirm if it has sufficient

capacity to supply fire sprinklers without an onsite sprinkler pump.

419

5 APPENDIX

1. Architects Proposed L1 Fit-Out Plans– MDC Municipal & CD Building.

2. Architects Proposed L2 Fit-Out Plans– MDC Municipal & CD Building.

420

7 7

A

A

B

B

6 6

5 5

1 1

3 3

2 2

4 4

D

D

C

C

E

E

F

F

G

G

H

H

I

I

J

J

K

K

L

L

M

M

N

N

O

O

P

P

36-031

36-031

36-061

36-061

PUBLIC FOYER

WIND LOBBY

PU

BLIC

T

OIL

ET

S

PARENTS ROOM

PLANNING &

ENVIRONMENTAL

SPRINKLER VALVE/PUMP

ROOM

RECEPTION

ADMIN SUPPORT

WAITING

LIFT

STAIR 2

STAIR 3

WIND LOBBY

ST

AIR

1

DRY SERVICES

ROOM

SEPARATE OFFICE

STAND ALONE TEAM OR PUBLIC MEETING ROOM

STORE ROOM

MEETING ROOM

MEETING ROOM

MEETING ROOM

STORE ROOM

MEETING

ROOM

MEETING ROOMU

P

UP

AREA LEGEND

L1. GROSS FLOOR AREA: 884m2

SITE AREA: 2,655m2

L2. GROSS FLOOR AREA: 886m2

L1. SUSPENDED CEILING HEIGHT

3.2m

L2. SUSPENDED CEILING HEIGHT

3.1m

36-041

36-041

36-051

36-051

NEW ENTRANCE STEPS

DIS

PL

AY

DIS

PL

AY

MA

LE

S

HO

WE

RS

LOCKERROOM

2000W x 1500D

FE

MA

LE

S

HO

WE

RS

QUIETROOM

QUIET ROOM

STAFF BREAK AREA

WET SERVICES

ROOM

MALE

UNI-SEX ACCESSIBLE

TOILET

FEMALE

LOCKERS LOCKERS

RESOURCE

RE

SO

UR

CE

ST

AT

ION

PUBLIC MEETING SPACE STAFF COMMUNITY SPACETEAM MEETING SPACE (6+ PEOPLE)SOCIAL / WELLBEING SPACE REFUGE SPACE (1-3 PEOPLE)ENCLAVE SPACE (3-6 PEOPLE)

SHEET:

STATUS:

(HALF SCALE at A3)

JOB NO:

DATE:

SCALE:

REV:

PROJECT:

CLIENT:

ADDRESS:

SHEET:

MASTERTON: 06 378 6332 WELLINGTON: 04 972 1906

24 Church Street, Masterton, P.O

Box 120

Suite 3, L2, 182 Vivian Street,

Wellington

www.silverwoodarchitects.co.nz info@silverwoodarchitects.co.nz

1 : 100 at A1

20-06L0. Proposed Floor Plan - Fitout

M1918

15/05/2019

64 Chapel Street, Masterton

Seismic Strengthening and Office

Fit-Out to MDC Municiple & CD

Building

Masterton District Council

Concept Design

REVISION SCHEDULEREF. DESCRIPTION DATE

421

7

A B

6

5

1

3

2

4

DC E F G H IJ K L M N O P

36-031

36-031

36-061

36-061

CHIEF EXECUTIVE TEAM OPERATIONS TEAM

MAYOR OFFICE

CEO OFFICE

RECEPTION

STAFF BREAK AREA

ST

AIR

1

ST

AIR

3

STORE ROOM

MEETING ROOM

DRY SERVICES

ROOM

VOID VOID

MEZZANINE

MEETING ROOM

MEETING ROOM

VOID

OFFICE

OFFICE

STAIR 2

QUIETROOM

QUIET ROOM

DOWN

DO

WN

36-041

36-041

WET SERVICES

ROOM

36-051

36-051

SE

RV

ICE

S

ST

AIR

MALE

UNI-SEX ACCESSIBLE

TOILET

FEMALE

LOCKERS LOCKERS

STORE ROOM

MEETING ROOM

MEETING ROOM

RE

SO

UR

CE

VOID

LIFT

2000W x 1500D

PUBLIC MEETING SPACE STAFF COMMUNITY SPACETEAM MEETING SPACE (6+ PEOPLE)SOCIAL / WELLBEING SPACE REFUGE SPACE (1-3 PEOPLE)ENCLAVE SPACE (3-6 PEOPLE)

AREA LEGEND

L1. GROSS FLOOR AREA: 884m2

SITE AREA: 2,655m2

L2. GROSS FLOOR AREA: 886m2

L1. SUSPENDED CEILING HEIGHT

3.2m

L2. SUSPENDED CEILING HEIGHT

3.1m

SHEET:

STATUS:

(HALF SCALE at A3)

JOB NO:

DATE:

SCALE:

REV:

PROJECT:

CLIENT:

ADDRESS:

SHEET:

MASTERTON: 06 378 6332 WELLINGTON: 04 972 1906

24 Church Street, Masterton, P.O

Box 120

Suite 3, L2, 182 Vivian Street,

Wellington

www.silverwoodarchitects.co.nz info@silverwoodarchitects.co.nz

1 : 100 at A1

20-07L1. Proposed Floor Plan - Fitout

M1918

15/05/2019

64 Chapel Street, Masterton

Seismic Strengthening and Office

Fit-Out to MDC Municiple & CD

Building

Masterton District Council

Concept Design

REVISION SCHEDULEREF. DESCRIPTION DATE

422