8/10/2019 4 Court Judgments Are Non

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4-court-judgments-are-non 1/3

COURT JUDGMENTS ARE NON-CASH ITEMS

One of the reasons I have referenced the article ‘Dispatch of Merchants’ is because of his explanation of

how the courts are being utilized to enforce a ‘chose-in-action’.

Blacks Law Dictionary defines a “chose” as: a thing, whether tangible or intangible; a personal article; a

chattel.

And a chose-in-action as follows: 1. A proprietary right in personum, such as a debt owed by another

person, a share in a joint-stock company, or a claim for damages in tort. 2. The right to bring an action

to recover a debt, money, or thing. 3. Personal property that oneperson owns but another person

[recall one of the trust maxims: where someone is in possession of a thing to which he is not legally

entitled, then he is construed as the ‘trustee’ of that thing. That should make it clear that when you are

drawn into court that it is a waste of time to claim that you are not the Defendant. The assumption is

that you are in possession of some thing/chose that belongs to the person appearing as the Plaintiff andthey are claiming that you are the

possesses, the owner being able to regain possession through a lawsuit.

Trustee

By this point all should understand that Black’s Law Dictionary is a dictionary created to facilitate

commerce. Do not confuse it with Boviers or Ballentynes law dictionaries. And so I have emphasized

certain words in the definition for consideration.

and that the Plaintiff is the beneficiary … so fork it over! So,

one response to any claim from a Plaintiff by you would be … “please identify what it is that I in

possession of which belongs to you, and what is your proof that the thing actually belongs to you. If the

Plaintiff would say ‘money’, you would either respond that you have no money or that the Defendant

JOHN DOE is bankrupt (refer to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of the US … hint: JOHN DOE is the US … it is

their trust, not yours, and the US is a constitutor for John Doe anyway!)]

1. “Proprietary” right … what kind of entity can have a proprietary right? Well, a ‘beneficiary’ of a trust

can have a proprietary right to the trust corpus … hmmm, so the beneficiary of the straw man trust has a

proprietary right? So, who is that beneficiary, since the straw man trust is set up as a cestui que vie

trust?

2. “Person” … by this time all students should be well aware that a person is a fictional entity, a

corporation, a straw man. Black’s definition fails miserable here where it says “one person owns”,

because obviously a person/fiction cannot ‘own’ anything.

So, it should be obvious that when a court tries to enforce a chose-in-action that there are serious flawsalready embedded in the whole process just by the definitions alone.

***obviously, the whole process in a court deals in fictions, etc. If the court is looked in this light, then

obviously the judgment which would come from such a court is also a fiction and has absolutely no

‘joinder’ or in other words, the judgment of the court has power of enforcement in the real world.

8/10/2019 4 Court Judgments Are Non

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4-court-judgments-are-non 2/3

8/10/2019 4 Court Judgments Are Non

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/4-court-judgments-are-non 3/3

transaction whether wholesale or retail is prepaid, and the only thing that needs to occur is that we

need to ‘adjust’ the accounting which we do via AFV, pass-through Treasury Direct, etc.]

COURT JUDGMENT IS A NON-CASH ITEM

Okay, so we have been through a court process and have a judgment against the Defendant. And you

are construed as the ‘trustee’ for the Defendant. Can the court or the plaintiff demand that you render

cash to satisfy the judgment. The answer is NO. What can the court demand of your? The can demand

that you as trustee ‘adjust’ the account as you have that legal responsibility to do so as trustee.

So how do you want to adjust the account? A short cut would be a promissory note.

A more favorable to you procedure would be a counterclaim. Remember that the counterclaim can be

before, during or after. And certainly, as we have seen, the counterclaim should be a verified claim.

And the counterclaim can be for less than, equal to, or more than the original claim.