3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

22
1 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with: Miguel Furman Jean-Luc Vay Dave Grote

description

3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman Jean-Luc Vay Dave Grote. ILC Wiggler will have Electron Cyclotron Resonances. What will they do?. Resonances where: n w c = bunch frequency and. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

Page 1: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

1

3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL

Christine Celata

Nov. 12, 2008

with: Miguel Furman

Jean-Luc Vay

Dave Grote

Page 2: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

2

ILC Wiggler will have Electron Cyclotron Resonances. What will they do?

Resonances where: nc = bunch frequency and

B << 2πmec

elb

Page 3: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

E-cloud current vs B-field, sum of all stripes.

(Plots are in Volt units. To convert in Ampere, multiply by 1.0E-4 )

Aluminum section, order of magnitude larger electron current.

TiN section.

Aluminum compared with TiN chamber

Ng, Pivi, Wang, SLAC

slide from Mauro Pivi

Page 4: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

4

Electron Cyclotron Resonances Present a Difficult Numerical Problem

ILC wiggler period = 40 cm

Bmax = 1.6 T

Need: z resolution ~ 2 mx,y resolution ~ 0.4 mm

Factor of 200 Numerical Inaccuracy?And small z resolution very long runs

What resolution is needed, and are the resonances important in 3D?

200 resonances in –0.6 B 0.6 T or z = 34 mm

34% of wiggler period is in this regime

FWHM of resonance 37 m

Page 5: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

5

Parameters of 3D Simulations

ILC e+ DR Wiggler Parameters

B gradient - linear, 1/10 of physical value

Resolution:x = 0.74 mmz = 0.022 mm

x/z = 34

Bx, Bz neglected

Non-evolving beam (Bassetti-Erskine field used)

PIC algorithm used for Space charge field

Run in parallel on NERSC computer

Page 6: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

6

Effects of the Resonances are There

after 50 bunch passages

Page 7: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

7

Tracing the vperp back to its birthplace in z

Page 8: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

8

Cyclotron Phase angle vs. z

Page 9: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

9

Line Charge Density vs. z

Variation ~ 30%

after 9 bunch passages

Page 10: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

10

The density pattern in x-y is not the usual

“stripes” patternIntegrated over z

3D, n=12-15 2D at n=12

run 87f

Page 11: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

11

Energy Histograms Near n=13 - Semilog Plots

Red = perpendicular, Blue = y, Black = total

1.4 mm 1.6 mm 1.7 mm

1.9 mm 2.1 mm 2.3 mmResonance

n=12.5

2D FWHM 2D FWHM

Page 12: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

12

Results from Single Particle Tracker with Linear B Gradient, 50 bunch passages

Initial z at n=12.0 Initial z at n=12.5

resonances are 1.4 mm apart

800 electrons launched

Page 13: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

13

dz is linear with length of time electron is in system

initial z at n=12.0

Page 14: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

14

Time in the system depends on initial Ey

initial z at n=12.0

Page 15: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

15

Time in system is dependent on x

initial z at n=12.0

Page 16: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

16

System Length Must be Extended

System length = 5.6 mmSystem length = 2.8 mm

Page 17: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

17

Very Preliminary Results - z Resolution

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

— z = 21 m — z = 5.2 m

Ave

rage

Ele

ctro

n de

nsit

y (

/m3 )

Time (s)

Page 18: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

18

Other results also look similar after 50 bunches

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Particle distribution in x-z plane and v distribution also lookvery similar.

Page 19: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

19

Observations

The electron cyclotron resonances do cause differences in cloud density with z in 3D. The differences are much smaller than in dipole magnets on and off resonance because electrons in the wiggler move in and out of resonance.

The resonances cause a difference in the density pattern in the x-y plane also.

The resonances are so closely spaced in the wiggler that the beam will surely average over them. But the average density is somewhat different from that in the case with no magnetic field.

Runs with a longer system are needed, and it remains to be determined what z resolution is needed for simulations with the correct B gradient.

Page 20: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

20

BACKUP SLIDES

Page 21: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

21

Delta z vs. zbirth

Page 22: 3D Electron Cloud Simulations at LBNL Christine Celata Nov. 12, 2008 with:Miguel Furman

22

Distribution of Electrons in x vs. z

after 50 bunch passages

integrated over y