3d Control Sphere Edge and Face Study Sup1
4
3D Control Sphere Edge and Face Investigation 1 st Supplement Dewayne Broussard, December 2009 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Rodin’s Control Circle This study was inspired by the comments of jtstatic on the David Icke forum. http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=61370&page=48 This is supplement explores the exchange of the poles in order to achieve a separation of the odd and even numbers when the vertices are projected onto the inscribed octahedron. On page four of the original study the resulting figures as shown here in figures 1 and figure 2 was displayed. The orange circles in Figure 2 indicate the sum of all the edges intersecting at that point. 7 3 5 1 6 4 8 2 9 The Control Sphere 9 7 3 5 1 6 4 8 2 9 9 2 5 5 1 1 4 8 2 6 5 3 2 6 6 3 3 Figure 2 3 2 4 8 6 1 5 6 7 3 Fold line Figure 1 Figure 1 displays the projected vertices on the internal octahedron. Pages two and three show the comparison between the original concept and one showing the exchanges poles. Part b of the figures show the change in “flow” of the values.
-
Upload
jafar-al-barmaki -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
4
Transcript of 3d Control Sphere Edge and Face Study Sup1
3D Control Sphere Edge and Face Investigation 1st Supplement Dewayne Broussard, December 2009 9
1
2
3
45
6
7
8
Rodin’s Control Circle
This study was inspired by the comments of jtstatic on the David Icke forum.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=61370&page=48
This is supplement explores the exchange of the poles in order to achieve a separation of the odd and even numbers when the vertices are projected onto the inscribed octahedron.On page four of the original study the resulting figures as shown here in figures 1 and figure 2 was displayed. The orange circles in Figure 2 indicate the sum of all the edges intersecting at that point.
7
3
5
1
6
4
8
29
The Control Sphere
9
7
3
5
1
6
4
8
2
9
9
2
5 5
1
1
4
8
2 6
5
3
2
6
6
3
3
Figure 2
3
24
8
6
15
67
3Fold lineFigure 1
Figure 1 displays the projected vertices on the internal octahedron. Pages two and three show the comparison between the original concept and one showing the exchanges poles. Part b of the figures show the change in “flow” of the values.
1
4
5
7
8 2
65 8
2
285
3
6
3 6
3
6 85
52
28
3
33
Figure 4b
5
8 2
65 8
2
285
3
6
3 6
3
6 85
52
28
3
33
7
4
11
4
5
7
8 2
32 5
8
285
3
6
3 6
3
6 85
52
28
9
99
Figure 3b
1
4
5
7
8 2
32 5
8
285
3
6
3 6
3
6 85
52
28
9
99
Figure 3aOriginal downward view
Figure 4aExchanged downward view
3D Control Sphere Edge and Face Investigation 1st Supplement
4
5
1
2
7
8
34
7
1
41 7
1
7
14
47
6
3
6 3
6
36
6
6
4
5
1
2
7
8
67
1
4
41 7
1
7
14
47
6
3
6 3
6
39
9
9
By exchanging the poles of 3 and 6 the top edges are advanced / retarded by 120 degrees.Interestingly the values of the facets adjacent to the poles stay the same.The horizontal planes values become 3 or 6 from 9.
Figure 5Original upward view
Figure 6Exchanged upward view
3D Control Sphere Edge and Face Investigation 1st Supplement
3D Control Sphere Edge and Face Investigation 1st Supplement
7
6
5
1
3
4
8
2
The overall property of the control sphere has not changed, however the Star tetrahedron has become polarized the {1,4,7} group and 3 on one extreme and the {2,5,8} group and 6 on the other.
This arrangement brings several thoughts to mind:
1) General appearances of a magnet.2) With number 1 above, the structure of
Nassim Heirman’s twin torus model. (not exactly sure why) Figure 8.
3) The work of Ed Leedskalnin, Vicktor Schauberger, and Wilhem Reich which all stated the a basic particle or energy form was polarized and/or tetrahedral in form.
Figure 7
Figure 83
58
142
7
6
