3b3 towards a tool for supporting

Fernando Alonso, José Luis Fuertes, Ángel Lucas González, Loïc Martínez

DLSIIS. Facultad de Informática. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Spain

1st International AEGIS ConferenceSevilla, Spain. October 2010

Towards a tool for supporting software accessibility conformity assessment

Introduction

Requirements for an accessibility evaluation tool

The tool: SACAST

Conclusions and future work

I

R

T

C


I

R

T

C

Demand for accessible software

Public procurement

(M/376)

ISO 9241-171 Software

accessibility

Conformity Assessment

Requirements for an

accessibility evaluation

tool


I

R

T

C

Need to demonstrate fulfilment of specified requirements

yes

no

End

Selection

Determination

Review and

attestation

Information on selected items

Information on fulfilment of specified requirements

Fulfilment of specified requirements demonstrated

Surveillance

needed?


Selection

R1. Decomposition and sampling

R2. Checklist management

Determination

R3. Automatic and manual evaluation

R4. Recording of detailed

results

R5. Workgroup management

Review and attestation

R6. Result aggregation

R7. Report generation

Surveillance

R8. Re-evaluation

support

I

R

T

C


• Client: user interface

• Server: stores information about ISO 9241-171, about software products and about evaluations

• Using PHP/MySQL

Client/Server application

• To perform a complete manual conformity assessment

• No automatic tests

• For each function of a software product

• User interface: accessible and easy to use (by experts in accessibility evaluation)

Functionality

I

R

T

C


I

R

T

C

Selection

R1. Decomposition and sampling

R2. Checklist management

Determination

R3. Automatic and manual evaluation

R4. Recording of detailed

results

R5. Workgroup management

Review and attestation

R6. Result aggregation

R7. Report generation

Surveillance

R8. Re-evaluation

support


I

R

T

C

1 3

4

5

2 6

7


I

R

T

C

• Need of support tools for conformity assessment

• Set of requirements defined in previous work

• We present on-going work: a prototype

Conclusions

• Evaluate usability of the tool

• Increment tool functionality. Plan:

• Workgroups (R5, R6)

• Complexity management (R1, R2)

• Report generation and surveillance (R7, R8)

Future work

Loïc Martínez-Normand ([email protected])Acknowledgement: Álvaro de Vicente

1st International AEGIS ConferenceSevilla, Spain. October 2010

3b3 towards a tool for supporting

Education

Transcript of 3b3 towards a tool for supporting