3936 (1): 131 140 Article ZOOTAXA2Colección Nacional de Arácnidos, Departamento de Zoología,...

ZOOTAXA

ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)

ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition)Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press

Zootaxa 3936 (1): 131–140

www.mapress.com/zootaxa/Article

http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3936.1.8

http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:13BE5B17-2C1B-42A6-8687-76F733F1FC2E

A new species of the “mexicanus” group of the genus Vaejovis C. L. Koch, 1836

from the Mexican state of Aguascalientes (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae)

GERARDO A. CONTRERAS-FÉLIX1, 2,4, OSCAR F. FRANCKE2 & ROBERT W. BRYSON JR.3

1Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Av. Universidad 3000, CP 04510. Coyoacan, Mexico

DF2Colección Nacional de Arácnidos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México;

Apartado Postal 70-153, México D.F: 04510. Mexico3Department of Biology & Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Box 351800, Seattle, WA 98195-

1800, USA4Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A new species of Vaejovis is described from the Mexican state of Aguascalientes. It is assigned to the “mexicanus” group

and compared with similar species from Jalisco, Guanajuato, and San Luis Potosí. A map with their known distributions

is provided.

Key words: Arachnida, Biodiversity, Endemism, Mexico, Sky islands, Vaejovis tenamaztlei

Introduction

Mexico is a biologically rich country (Mittermeier & Goettsch, 1992; Mittermeier et al., 1997), and has more species of scorpion than any other country in the world (258 of the 1913 species; Francke, 2014). Vaejovidae is the most diverse scorpion family in North America, with 176 species currently recognized within 23 genera (Soleglad & Fet, 2008). The genus Vaejovis C. L. Koch, 1836 is the largest within the family, and contains 57 species (Soleglad & Fet, 2008). The type species of the genus, by monotypy, is Vaejovis mexicanus C. L. Koch, 1836, and the “mexicanus” group is distinguished from other Vaejovis by six particular characters (Santibáñez-López & Francke, 2010): 1) the spermatophore lacks a sclerotized mating plug, 2) the telotarsus III distal spinule count is three (rarely) or higher, 3) six rows of denticles in the fixed finger of the pedipalp chela, 4) the position of trichobothria ib–it at the base of the fixed finger of the pedipalp chela, 5) stocky pedipalps, and 6) dark mottling on a brownish background color on most of the species. The “mexicanus” group as currently recognized includes 18 species, generally found in the highlands of Mexico above 1800 m (Santibáñez-López & Francke, 2010; Contreras-Félix & Francke, in prep.).

The Mexican state of Aguascalientes (Fig. 1), despite being the fifth smallest state in Mexico, contains an impressive biotic diversity (Ávila-Villegas, 2008). Several distinct physiographical regions, each with its own evolutionarily distinct biota, intersect within the confines of the state borders (Morrone, 2006; Bryson et al., 2008). However, relatively little is known about the scorpion fauna of Aguascalientes (Escoto-Rocha & Delgado-Saldívar, 2008). Seven genera and eight species are now known to occur in this state (González-Santillán & Prendini, 2013). Conspicuously absent are montane species of the “mexicanus” group of Vaejovis, which predictably should be present in the Sierra Fría and the Sierra del Laurel, two mesic, high-elevation mountains in Aguascalientes. Several trips were taken to the latter mountain range to search for montane scorpions, and a new species found in the Sierra Laurel is described here and compared to similar species in the “mexicanus” group. Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. is the first species of this genus in Aguascalientes, increasing the state’s diversity to seven genera and nine species.

Accepted by L. Prendini: 16 Feb. 2015; published: 18 Mar. 2015 131

FIGURE 1. Type locality of Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. and closely related species in the “mexicanus” group of Vaejovis C. L. Koch, 1836 from the Mexican highlands.

Material and methods

Nomenclature and mensuration follow Stahnke (1970), except as follows: Vachon (1974) for trichobothrial terminology, González-Santillán & Prendini (2013) for metasomal and pedipalpal carinal terminology, and McWest (2009) for telotarsal setae terminology. The hemispermatophores were dissected following Vachon (1952) and cleared by the technique recommended by Álvarez & Hormiga (2008); terminology follows González-Santillán & Prendini (2013). Surfaces of the pedipalp, carapace, mesosoma, and metasoma were observed and photographed under UV light as described in Prendini (2003) and Volschenk (2005). Higher-level taxonomy of scorpions follows Coddington et al. (2004) and Prendini & Wheeler (2005). Measurements were taken with an ocular micrometer calibrated at 10X and are given in millimeters. Measurements and proportions are given inside parenthesis for males (xx), and inside brackets for females [xx].

Variation on setae of each metasomal segment is given in Table 2, and is as follows: dorsal lateral carinae / lateral median carinae / lateral inframedian carinae / ventral lateral carinae / ventral submedian carinae (or ventral median carina on segment V). Table 3 gives the variation on the leg setae, taken and modified from McWest

CONTRERAS-FÉLIX ET AL. 132 · Zootaxa 3936 (1) © 2015 Magnolia Press

(2009). Successive legs are separated by a colon (:), and a slash (/) is used to separate the counts on the prointernal (pi) and retrointernal (ri) portion of the telotarsus and basitarsus from each leg (e.g., I pi/ri: II pi/ri: III pi/ri: IV pi/

ri). If a given leg is damaged or absent, it is represented by “X”.Abbreviations for depositories are as follows: AMNH–American Museum of Natural History, New York;

CNAN–Colección Nacional de Arácnidos, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F. México. Other abbreviations: L = length, W = width, D = depth, C = carapace, MSV = metasomal segment V, and F = pedipalp femur.

Taxonomy

Genus Vaejovis C. L. Koch, 1836

Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n.

(Figs. 2–3, 6–9, 11–13)

Holotype. Aguascalientes: Municipio Calvillo, 3 km to the east of “Alamitos” dam, Sierra del Laurel (N 21.73531º, W 102. 69753º, 2440 m), 24.VII.2012. O. Francke, G. Contreras, D. Barrales & A. Valdez. 1 ♂ (CNAN–T0871).

Paratypes. Aguascalientes: Same data as the holotype. 1 ♂, 3 ♀ (CNAN T–0872). Municipio Calvillo, Los Alisos, Sierra del Laurel (N 21.725611º W 102.700389º, 2415 m), 10.I.2011. J. C. Arenas. 1 ♂ (AMNH).

Other specimens examined: Aguascalientes: Municipio Calvillo, Los Alisos, Sierra del Laurel (N 21.725611º W 102.700389º, 2415 m), 20.VII.2010. R. W. Bryson Jr. 1 ♀ (AMNH), 5 adults ♀, 3 subadults ♂ (CNAN). Aguascalientes: Municipio Calvillo, 3 km to the east of “Alamitos” dam, Sierra del Laurel (N 21.73531º, W 102.69753º, 2440 m), 24.VII.2012. O. Francke, G. Contreras, D. Barrales & A. Valdez. 2 adults ♀ , 9 juvenile ♀.

Distribution. Known only from the two localities within the higher elevations of the Sierra del Laurel in southwestern Aguascalientes (Fig. 1). This species probably occurs in other regions within the Sierra del Laurel, including adjacent areas in northern Jalisco.

Diagnosis. Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. belongs to the “mexicanus” group of Vaejovis as diagnosed above; i.e., it has six rows of denticles on the fixed finger of the pedipalp chela, trichobothria ib – it are located at the base of the fixed finger of the pedipalp chela, and the spermatophore lacks a sclerotized mating plug. This is a small to medium-sized species of Vaejovis, with adult total length ranging from 19.4 mm to 26.6 mm (Table 1). Carapace on males shorter than metasomal segment V (C L/MSV L 0.85 ± 0.06), but as long or slightly longer on females [C L/MSV L 1.02 ± 0.02], and longer than pedipalp femur in both males (C L/F L 1.13 ± 0.13) and females [C L/F L [1.22 ± 0.07]; anterior margin of carapace slightly concave, almost straight, without median notch. Tergite VII with median lateral and lateral carinae weak, composed of a discontinuous line of rounded granules, and both pairs of carinae never reaching posterior margin of segment. Sternite VII with lateral carinae weak, composed of a cuticular ridge and some scattered granules. Metasomal segment I wider than long (L/W 0.7 ±0.01); intercarinal spaces on metasomal segments I–V shagreened; metasomal segment V wider than deep (W/D 1.15 ± 0.1). Vesicle long and slender (L/W 2.16 ± 0.1; W/D 1.3 ± 0.03); dorsally with a conspicuous central depression due to a presumed glandular area, deeper on adult males than on females and subadult males, on which it is almost absent. Pedipalp femur less than three times as long as wide (L/W 2.87 ± 0.13) [2.75 ± 0.15]. Patella less than three times as long as wide (L/W 2.89 ± 0.11) [2.77 ± 0.13]; patellar prolateral carina weak, with few sharp scattered granules. Chela rounded (L/W 2 ± 0.09) [2 ± 0.1] as wide as deep (W/D 1) [1]; with prolateral median-ventrosubmedian carina feebly granular, but conspicuously more elevated than the rest of the carinae which are represented by low cuticular ridges. Pectinal tooth count on males 16–17 (mode=16, n=8), and on females 13–14 [mode=14, n=16].

Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. is similar in coloration to the geographically proximate species Vaejovis dugesi

Pocock, 1902, from Guanajuato (Fig. 1), but is well differentiated by the following characters: patella proportionally shorter on V. tenamaztlei sp. n., less than three times as long as wide (L/W 2.85) [2.75], whereas in V. dugesi the patella is more than three times longer than wide (L/W 3.23) [3.06]; pectinal tooth counts higher in V.

tenamaztlei sp. n. (16–17) [13–14] than in V. dugesi (12–14) [12–13]; additionally the vesicle on V. tenamaztlei sp.

n. presents the dorsal face of the vesicle with a noticeably, concave, central depression on males, whereas in V.

dugesi the dorsal face of the vesicle is almost flat with no evident depression; distal telotarsal spinules less than

Zootaxa 3936 (1) © 2015 Magnolia Press · 133DESCRIPTION OF VAEJOVIS TENAMAZTLEI

four in V. dugesi, (mode=2, n=32) up to six in V. tenamaztlei sp. n. (mode=4, n=40); in adult size, V. dugesi are larger on average (30.4 mm, n=8) compared to V. tenamaztlei sp. n. (24 mm, n=10); additionally, the hemispermatophore hooks are small and present three faint ridges (Fig. 14), but in V. dugesi the hooks are enlarged and there is not an evident division (Figs. 15–17). Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. also resembles Vaejovis tesselatus

Hendrixson and Sissom, 2001, from San Luis Potosí (Fig. 1), but differs from this species by the following characters: the shape of the anterior margin of the carapace is concave in V. tesselatus but almost straight in V.

tenamaztlei sp. n.; the coloration of V. tesselatus is brownish and diffuse, but yellowish with dark spots in V.

tenamaztlei sp. n.; total setae count on sternite VII is 16 in V. tesselatus (mode=16, n=2) and only 10 in V.

tenamaztlei sp. n. (mode=10, n=10); finally, the femur in V. tenamaztlei sp. n. is less than three times longer than wide (L/W 2.87) [2.75], whereas in V. tesselatus it is more than three times longer than wide (L/W 3.55) [3.09]. Vaejovis monticola Sissom, 1989, from Jalisco (Fig. 1), is also geographically close to V. tenamaztlei sp. n., but differs as follows: Vaejovis monticola presents a nearly uniform dark brown coloration, compared to the lighter, yellowish colour with dark spots of V. tenamaztlei sp. n.; the vesicle on males in V. tenamaztlei sp. n. is long and slender (L/W 2.21), whereas in V. monticola it is short and globose (L/W 1.5); finally, the hemispermatophore in V.

tenamaztlei sp. n. has a relatively long lamella and an apical crest medially, whereas in V. monticola the hemispermatophore has a relatively short lamella and the apical crest is marginal rather than medial. Vaejovis

montanus Graham and Bryson, 2010, from Chihuahua, superficially resembles V. tenamaztlei sp. n., but differs from this species by the following characters: white patch on the fifth mesosomal segment present in V. montanus, absent in V. tenamaztlei sp. n.; pectinal tooth counts lower in male V. montanus (11–13) than male V. tenamaztlei

sp. n. (16–17); finally, the hemispermatophore in V. montanus (Graham & Bryson, 2010: Figs. 16–17) has hooks that are nearly absent and lamella that are more slender at the base compared to V. tenamaztlei sp. n.

Description of holotype male (Figs. 2–3, 6–9, 11–14) Prosoma (Fig. 6): Carapace yellow with underlying fusco-piceus pattern; surface shagreened, with few

granules. Frontal margin smooth, almost straight, with three setae on each side. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, posterior pair markedly reduced in size.

Mesosoma: Tergites yellow, with underlying fusco-piceus coloration; surface of tergites I–VI smooth medially, with few rounded granules, becoming more granulose laterally on post-tergites. Tergite VII shagreened; lateral and median lateral carinae formed by a single line of granules. Sternites III–VII smooth, with pale yellow coloration, with a dark line on lateral margins. Sternite VII with 5 pairs of setae, including one pair on posterior margin. Pectinal tooth count 16–16.

TABLE 1. Measurements (in mm) from selected specimens in the type series of Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. from

Aguascalientes, Mexico (L = length, W = width, D = depth).

Holotype ♂ Paratype ♂ Paratype ♂ Paratype ♀ Paratype ♀ Paratype ♀

Total L 22.1 21.1 19.4 21.5 25 26.6

Carapace L/W 2.9/1.5 2.3/1.6 2.6/1.4 2.8/1.6 3.4/1.9 3.6/1.9

Mesosoma L 6.5 6.7 5.8 7.6 8.6 9.2

MS I length 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4

MS II length 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7

MS III length 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9

MS IV length 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.1 2.3

MS V length 3.1 3.2 2.9 2.7 3.4 3.5

Metasoma length 9.2 9.6 8.6 8.6 10.2 10.8

Vesicle L/W/D 2.6/1.2/0.9 2.5/1.2/0.9 2.4/1/0.8 2.5/1.3/1 2.8/1.5/1.1 3/1.5/1.1

Femur L/W/D 2.3/0.8/0.6 2.4/0.8/0.6 2.2/0.8/0.6 2.4/0.9/0.6 2.7/1/0.7 2.9/1/0.8

Patella L/W/D 2.7/0.9/0.8 2.9/1/0.8 2.5/0.9/0.7 2.7/1/0.8 3/1.1/0.8 3.5/1.2/1

Chela L/W/D 2.4/1.2/1.2 2.5/1.2/1.3 2.3/1.2/1.2 2.3/1.2/1.3 2.6/1.3/1.3 2.9/1.4/1.4

Movable finger L 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.6 3 2.5

Fixed finger L 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.9 2.4 3

Pectinal teeth 16–16 16–16 16–16 13–14 13–14 14–14


PLATE 1. Habitus of Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. 2–3 Holotype male, dorsal and ventral views. 4–5 paratype female, dorsal and ventral views. Scale bar 1 cm.


PLATE 2. Structures of taxonomical importance in Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. 6—Carapace of holotype male, dorsal view; 7—femur of holotype, dorsal view; 8—patella of holotype, external view; 9—chela of holotype, external view; 10—chela of paratype female, external view; 11—holotype metasomal segment V and vesicle, showing the oval concavity of the vesicle (arrow). Scale bar 1 mm. White circles highlight the trichobothria.

Metasoma: Yellowish, becoming darker distally on segments IV and V. Dorsal lateral carinae on I–IV composed by a single line of granules, well-differentiated from each other, with distal granule slightly bigger. Lateral median carinae on I strong, composed by a single line of granules, well-differentiated from each other; on II–IV composed by a single line of pointed granules, directed posteriorly. Lateral inframedian carinae on I strong, composed by a single row of granules; on II–III weak, present only on posterior fifth of each segment, composed by a short line of no more than seven granules; on IV absent. Ventral lateral carinae on I moderately strong, composed by a single line of granules; on II–IV slightly weaker, almost smooth, composed by a line of short, rounded granules. Ventral submedian carinae on I weak, with unaligned short granules; on II–IV strong, composed by a single line of rounded granules. Segment V wider than deep; dorsal lateral carinae weak, composed by several


rows of small, rounded granules; lateral median carinae present only on anterior half of segment, strong anteriorly, becoming weaker distally; ventral lateral carinae weak, composed by a line of rounded granules; ventral median carina strong, composed by an irregular row of rounded granules. Setal counts as follows: segments I–IV: dorsal lateral 3/3/3/3-4; lateral supramedian 2/3/3/3; lateral inframedian 1/0/0/0; ventral lateral 0/1/1-0/2; ventral submedian 0/0/0-1/0-1; segment V 3/2/4/4.

Telson: Longer than wide; coloration pale yellow. Dorsal face noticeably concave basally; centrally with a conspicuous, concave, oval spot (Fig. 11). Ventral face smooth, with few scattered setae, each on a darker insertion socket. Laterobasal aculear serrations absent.

Pedipalp (Figs. 7–10): Yellow, infuscated along margins, along carinae and around setal and trichobothrial insertions; orthobothriotaxia “C”.

PLATE 3. Hemispermatophores. Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. 12–13, ental and mesal views; 14, detail of lobe on capsular region. Vaejovis dugesi Pocock, 1902. 16–17, ental and mesal views; 15, detail of lobe on capsular region. Abbreviations: ac: apical crest; h: hooks. Scale bar 1 mm.

Femur (Fig. 7): Considerably wider than deep (W/L 0.34). Dorsal prolateral carina strong, composed of a line of large rounded granules. Dorsal retrolateral carina strong, composed of an irregular line of large rounded granules. Ventral prolateral carina strong, composed of a line of large rounded granules and some additional granules off-line. Prolateral ventrosubmendian carina weak to vestigial, composed of some small dispersed granules.

Patella (Fig. 8): Dorsal prolateral carina strong, composed of a line of big rounded granules. Dorsal prolateral carina strong, composed of a line of big rounded granules, well differentiated from each other. Dorsal retrolateral carina weak, almost smooth, composed by a row of rounded, flattened granules. Retrolateral median carina vestigial to absent, present only as low cuticular ridge with some small, scattered granules. Ventral prolateral carina composed of an irregular row of big rounded granules. Ventral median carina composed only by few granules distally. Ventral retrolateral carina weak, smooth, composed by an irregular elevation of cuticle.

Chela (Figs. 9, 10): Chela rounded (L/W 2 ± 0.09) [2 ± 0.1], as deep as wide (W/D 1) [1]. Trichobothria it and ib at base of fixed finger. Chela manus with prolateral median-ventrosubmendian carina feebly granular; dorsal retrosubmedian, dorsal median, dorsal prosubmedian, ventral prolateral, ventral prosubmedian, and ventral retrolateral carinae smooth, differentiated only as cuticular ridges; other carina vestigial or absent. Dentate margin


of fixed finger divided into six denticular subrows, with six enlarged outer denticles and six inner denticles; dentate margin of movable finger divided into six subrows, with five enlarged outer denticles and seven inner denticles.

Legs: Yellow, with fuscosity on all segments. Femora I–IV with one row of pointed tubercles ventrally. Telotarsi ventrally with one row of setae medially on each leg; telotarsal distal spinules X/4:4/4:6/6:4/4; pi/ri

counts 1/0:2/1:2/2:2/2. Hemispermatophore (Fig. 12–14): Lamelliform. Lamina wider at the base, with an apical crest medially.

Laminar hooks with three rounded ridges. Capsular lobe present, well-sclerotized and may present some faint, small granules.

TABLE 2. Variation in the metasomal setae counts in adult specimens of Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. from

Aguascalientes, Mexico.

TABLE 3. Variation in the setal counts on each segment of the legs on selected specimens of Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n.

from Aguascalientes, Mexico. DTS = distal telotarsal spinules (successive legs are separated by a colon (:), and a slash

(/) is used to separate the counts on the left/right side; X=missing or damaged segment); pi/ri T = prointernal and

retrointernal setae of telotarsus; pi/ri B = prointernal and retrointernal setae of basitarsus (successive legs are separated

by a colon (:), and a slash (/) is used to separate the counts on the prointernal (pi) and retrointernal (ri) portion of the

telotarsus and basitarsus from each leg (e.g., I pi/ri: II pi/ri: III pi/ri: IV pi/ri); X = missing or damaged segment).

Variation. There is variation on the concave structure on the dorsal face of the telson in V. tenamaztlei sp. n.

due to sexual dimorphism and age; on adult males it is very conspicuous, whereas on juveniles and females this structure is weak, almost absent (Fig. 11). Females have metasomal segment V usually longer than carapace [MSV L/C L 1.02], whereas males have segment V shorter than the carapace (MSV L/C L 0.85). Females also present a vesicle less than two times as long as wide [L/W 1.92], whereas on males the vesicle is over twice longer than wide

V. tenamaztlei Dorsal lateral Lateral median Lateral inframedian (absent on segment V)

Ventral lateral Ventral submedian/median (on segment V)

Holotype ♂ 0/0/0-1/0-1/3 0/1/0-1/2/2 1/0/0/0 2/3/3/3/4 3/3/3/4-3/2

Paratype ♂ 0/0/0-1/1/3 0/1/1/2/2-1 1/0/0/0 2/3/3/3/4 3/3/3/4/2

Paratype ♂ 0/0/0-1/1/3 0/0/1/2/2 1/0/1/0 2/3/3/3/4 3/3/3/4/1

♂ 0/0/0/1/3-4 0/1/1/2/3 1/0/0/0 3/3/3/3/5 3/3/3/4/4

Paratype ♀ 0/0/1/2-1/3 0-1/1/1/2/2 1/0/0/0 2/3/3/3/6 3/3/3/4/3-4

Paratype ♀ 0/0/1/2/3 0/1/2/2/3-2 2-1/0/0/0 2/3/3/3/4 3/3/3/4/4

♀ 0/0/0/1/3 0/1/1/2/2 1/0/0/0 2/3/3/3/4 3/4/3/4/2

♀ 0/0/0/1/3 0/1/1/2/2 1/0/0/0 2/3/3/3/4 3/3-4/3/4/3

♀ 0/0/0-1/1/3 0/1/1/2/2 1/0/0/0 2/2/3/3/4 3/3/3/4/3

♀ 0/0/1/1/3 0/1/1/2/2 1/0/0/0 2/3/3/3/3 3/3/3/4/3

Setae on legs

Specimens DTS pi/ri T pi/ri B

Holotype ♂ x/4:4/4:6/6/:4/4 x/x:2/1:2/2:2/2 x/x:3/3:4/4:4/4

Paratype ♂ 4/4:4/4:6/4:4/4 1/0:2/1:2/1:2/1 3/3:3/3:4/4:4/4

Paratype ♂ X/4:2/4:2/4:2/4 x/x:1/1:2/1:2/2 x/x:3/3:4/4.4/4

♂ 4/4:4/4:4/6:4/4 1/0:2/1:2/1:2/2 3/3:3/3:3/3:4/4

Paratype ♀ 4/4:6/4:6/4:5/4 1/1:2/1:2/2:2/2 3/3:3/3:3/3:4/4

Paratype ♀ 4/4:4/4:6/6:6/6 1/1:2/1:2/2:2/1 3/3:3/3:3/3:4/4

♀ 4/6:6/4:4/4:4/4 1/0:2/1:2/1:2/1 3/3:3/3:4/4:4/4

♀ 4/4:4/4:X/4:4/4 1/0:1/1:2/1:2/2 3/3:3/3:4/4:4/4

♀ 4/4:4/4:4/X:4/4 1/0:2/1:2/1:2/2 3/3:3/3:4/4:4/4

♀ 6/6:4/6:4/4:4/4 1/0:2/2:2/1:2/1 3/3:4/4:4/4:4/5


(L/W 2.21). Females are bigger in size than the males, and the pedipalp chela carinae are less strongly developed than on males. In addition, the genital operculum on females is separated on posterior one-third, whereas on males are fully connected. Variation in pectinal tooth counts as follows: are males 7 combs with 16 teeth, 1 comb with 17 teeth; in females 10 combs with 13 teeth, 4 combs with 14 teeth. Variation in setal counts of the metasomal segments is shown in Table 2, and in telotarsal setae is shown in Table 3.

Etymology. The species epithet tenamaztlei is a patronym honoring Francisco Tenamaztle, an influential leader of the Caxcan people that inhabited parts of Jalisco, Zacatecas, and Aguascalientes.

Habitat. Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. was found in winter during the dry season, as well as in the summer during the rainy season. Specimens were found underneath rocks in oak forest during the day. Specimens from Los Alisos were found along the base of a rock wall, which followed the crest of a hill (Figure 18). The vaejovid scorpion Mesomexovis punctatus (Karsch, 1879) was also found in abundance underneath those rocks.

Natural history. Among the specimens collected during July, three females had broods on their back, and the counts of newborns were 14, 18 and 22, respectively; the young were positioned randomly on the mother’s back.

FIGURE 18. Habitat at the paratype locality for Vaejovis tenamaztlei sp. n. Los Alisos, Sierra del Laurel, Aguascalientes.

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to acknowledge CONACyT and the Graduate Program in Biological Sciences of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México for financial support. Research was conducted under scientific collecting permit FAUT-0175 issued by SEMARNAT to O. Francke. We thank D. Barrales, A. Valdez, J. C. Arenas, and M. Torocco for assistance with fieldwork. Financial support for field work was provided partially by Instituto Bioclon, S. A. (Mexico, D. F.) to O. Francke.


References

Álvarez-Padilla, F. & Hormiga, G. (2008) A protocol for digesting internal soft tissues and mounting spiders for scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Arachnology, 35 (3), 538–542.

Ávila-Villegas, H. (2008) Introducción. In: Comisión Nacional Para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (Eds.), La Biodiversidad Biológica en Aguascalientes: Estudio de Estado. CONABIO, México, pp. 81.

Bryson, R.W., Mendoza-Quijano, F. & Riddle, B.R. (2008) Aguascalientes: pequeño estado, gran biogeografía. In: Comisión Nacional Para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (Ed.), La Biodiversidad Biológica en Aguascalientes: Estudio de Estado. CONABIO, México, pp. 146.

Coddington, J.A., Giribet, G., Harvey, M.S., Prendini, L. & Walter, D.E. (2004) Arachnida. In: Cracraft, J. & Donoghue, M. (Eds.), Assembling the Tree of Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 296–318.

Escoto-Rocha, J. & Delgado-Saldívar, L. (2008) Insectos y Arácnidos. In: Comisión Nacional Para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (Ed.) La Biodiversidad Biológica en Aguascalientes: Estudio de Estado. CONABIO, México, p 126–128.

Francke, O.F. (2014) Biodiversidad de Arthropoda (Chelicerata: Arachnida ex Acari) en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 85, 408–418.

González-Santillán, E. & Prendini, L. (2013) Redefinition and generic revision of the North American vaejovid scorpion subfamily Syntropinae Kraepelin, 1905, with descriptions of six new genera. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 382, 1–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1206/830.1

Graham, M.R. & Bryson, R.W. (2010) Vaejovis montanus (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae), a new species from the Sierra Madre Occidental of Mexico. The Journal of Arachnology, 38, 185–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/Ha09-90.1

McWest, K. (2009) Tarsal spinules and setae of vaejovid scorpions (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae). Zootaxa, 2001, 1–126.Mittermeier, R. & Goettsch, C. (1992) La importancia de la diversidad biológica de México. In: CONABIO (Ed.), México ante

los retos de la biodiversidad. CONABIO, Mexico, pp. 57–62.Mittermeier, R., Goettsch, C. & Robles Gil, P. (1997) Megadiversidad. Los paises biológicamente más ricos del mundo.

CEMEX, México, 501 pp.Morrone, J.J. (2006) Biogeographic Areas and Transition Zones of Latin America and the Caribbean Islands Based on

Panbiogeographic and Cladistic Analyses of the Entomofauna. Annual Reviews of Entomology, 51, 467–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130447

Prendini, L. (2003) Revision of the genus Lisposoma Lawrence, 1928 (Scorpiones: Bothriuridae). Insect Systematics and Evolution, 34, 241–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187631203788964764

Prendini, L. & Wheeler, W. (2005) Scorpions higher phylogeny and classification, taxonomic anarchy, and standards for peer review in online publishing. Cladistics, 21, 446–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00073.x

Santibáñez-López, C.E. & Francke, O.F. (2010) New and poorly known species of the mexicanus Group of the genus Vaejovis(Scorpiones: Vaejovidae) from Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Arachnology, 38, 555–571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/Ha09-64.1

Soleglad, M.E. & Fet, V. (2008) Contributions to scorpion systematics. III. Subfamilies Smeringurinae and Syntropinae (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae). Euscorpius, 71, 1–115.

Stahnke, H.L. (1970) Scorpion nomenclature and mensuration. Entomological News, 81, 297–316.Vachon, M. (1952) Étude sur les Scorpions. Institut Pasteur d’Algérie, Alger, 482 pp.Vachon, M. (1974) Étude des caracteres utilisés pour classer les familes et les genres de Scorpions (Arachnides) 1. La

trichobothriotaxie en Arachnologie, Sigles trichobothriaux et types de trichobothriotaxie chez les Scorpions. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Series 3, 140 (Zool. 104), mai-juin 1973, 857–958. [Paris, Cover date 1973, published in January 31, 1974: See footnote in p. 958]

Volschenk, E.S. (2005) A new technique for examining surface morphosculpture of scorpions. Journal of Arachnology, 33, 820–825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/S03-047.1


3936 (1): 131 140 Article ZOOTAXA2Colección Nacional de Arácnidos, Departamento de Zoología,...

Documents

Transcript of 3936 (1): 131 140 Article ZOOTAXA2Colección Nacional de Arácnidos, Departamento de Zoología,...