34 Pgd.indd - National Fire Protection Association
18
Report on Proposals 2010 Annual Revision Cycle NOTE: The proposed NFPA documents addressed in this Report on Proposals (ROP) and in a follow-up Report on Comments (ROC) will only be presented for action when proper Amending Motions have been submitted to the NFPA by the deadline of April 9, 2010. The June 2010 NFPA Conference & Expo will be held June 7–10, 2010 at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas, NV. During the meeting, the Association Technical Meeting (Tech Session) will be held June 9–10, 2010. Documents that receive no motions will not be presented at the meeting and instead will be forwarded directly to the Standards Council for action on issuance. For more information on the rules and for up-to-date information on schedules and deadlines for processing NFPA documents, check the NFPA website (www.nfpa.org) or contact NFPA Standards Administration. ISSN 1079-5332 Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved NFPA and National Fire Protection Association are registered trademarks of the National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA 02169. National Fire Protection Association® 1 BATTERYMARCH PARK, QUINCY, MA 02169-7471 A compilation of NFPA ® Technical Committee Reports on Proposals for public review and comment Public Comment Deadline: September 4, 2009
Transcript of 34 Pgd.indd - National Fire Protection Association
Report onProposals
2010 Annual Revision Cycle
NOTE: The proposed NFPA documents addressed in this Report on
Proposals (ROP) and in a follow-up Report on Comments (ROC) will
only be presented for action when proper Amending Motions have been
submitted to the NFPA by the deadline of April 9, 2010. The June 2010
NFPA Conference & Expo will be held June 7–10, 2010 at the Mandalay
Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas, NV. During the meeting, the Association
Technical Meeting (Tech Session) will be held June 9–10, 2010. Documents
that receive no motions will not be presented at the meeting and instead will
be forwarded directly to the Standards Council for action on issuance. For
more information on the rules and for up-to-date information on schedules
and deadlines for processing NFPA documents, check the NFPA website
(www.nfpa.org) or contact NFPA Standards Administration.
ISSN 1079-5332 Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved
NFPA and National Fire Protection Association are registered trademarks of the National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA 02169.
National Fire Protection Association®1 BATTERYMARCH PARK, QUINCY, MA 02169-7471
A compilation of NFPA® TechnicalCommittee Reports on Proposals for public review and comment
Public Comment Deadline: September 4, 2009
Information on NFPA Codes and Standards Development
I. Applicable Regulations. The primary rules governing the processing of NFPA documents (codes, standards, recommended practices, and guides) are the NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects (Regs). Other applicable rules include NFPA Bylaws, NFPA Technical Meeting Convention Rules, NFPA Guide for the Conduct of Participants in the NFPA Standards Development Process, and the NFPA Regulations Governing Petitions to the Board of Directors from Decisions of the Standards Council. Most of these rules and regulations are contained in the NFPA Directory. For copies of the Directory, contact Codes and Standards Administration at NFPA Headquarters; all these documents are also available on the NFPA website at “www.nfpa.org.”
The following is general information on the NFPA process. All participants, however, should refer to the actual rules and regulations for a full understanding of this process and for the criteria that govern participation.
II. Technical Committee Report. The Technical Committee Report is defined as “the Report of the Technical Committee and Technical Correlating Committee (if any) on a document. A Technical Committee Report consists of the Report on Proposals (ROP), as modified by the Report on Comments (ROC), published by the Association.”
III. Step 1: Report on Proposals (ROP). The ROP is defined as “a report to the Association on the actions taken by Technical Committees and/or Technical Correlating Committees, accompanied by a ballot statement and one or more proposals on text for a new document or to amend an existing document.” Any objection to an action in the ROP must be raised through the filing of an appropriate Comment for consideration in the ROC or the objection will be considered resolved.
IV. Step 2: Report on Comments (ROC). The ROC is defined as “a report to the Association on the actions taken by Technical Committees and/or Technical Correlating Committees accompanied by a ballot statement and one or more comments resulting from public review of the Report on Proposals (ROP).” The ROP and the ROC together constitute the Technical Committee Report. Any outstanding objection following the ROC must be raised through an appropriate Amending Motion at the Association Technical Meeting or the objection will be considered resolved.
V. Step 3a: Action at Association Technical Meeting. Following the publication of the ROC, there is a period during which those wishing to make proper Amending Motions on the Technical Committee Reports must signal their intention by submitting a Notice of Intent to Make a Motion. Documents that receive notice of proper Amending Motions (Certified Amending Motions) will be presented for action at the annual June Association Technical Meeting. At the meeting, the NFPA membership can consider and act on these Certified Amending Motions as well as Follow-up Amending Motions, that is, motions that become necessary as a result of a previous successful Amending Motion. (See 4.6.2 through 4.6.9 of Regs for a summary of the available Amending Motions and who may make them.) Any outstanding objection following action at an Association Technical Meeting (and any further Technical Committee consideration following successful Amending Motions, see Regs at 4.7) must be raised through an appeal to the Standards Council or it will be considered to be resolved.
VI. Step 3b: Documents Forwarded Directly to the Council. Where no Notice of Intent to Make a Motion (NITMAM) is received and certified in accordance with the Technical Meeting Convention Rules, the document is forwarded directly to the Standards Council for action on issuance. Objections are deemed to be resolved for these documents.
VII. Step 4a: Council Appeals. Anyone can appeal to the Standards Council concerning procedural or substantive matters related to the development, content, or issuance of any document of the Association or on matters within the purview of the authority of the Council, as established by the Bylaws and as determined by the Board of Directors. Such appeals must be in written form and filed with the Secretary of the Standards Council (see 1.6 of Regs). Time constraints for filing an appeal must be in accordance with 1.6.2 of the Regs. Objections are deemed to be resolved if not pursued at this level.
VIII. Step 4b: Document Issuance. The Standards Council is the issuer of all documents (see Article 8 of Bylaws). The Council acts on the issuance of a document presented for action at an Association Technical Meeting within 75 days from the date of the recommendation from the Association Technical Meeting, unless this period is extended by the Council (see 4.8 of Regs). For documents forwarded directly to the Standards Council, the Council acts on the issuance of the document at its next scheduled meeting, or at such other meeting as the Council may determine (see 4.5.6 and 4.8 of Regs).
IX. Petitions to the Board of Directors. The Standards Council has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the codes and standards development process and the issuance of documents. However, where extraordinary circumstances requiring the intervention of the Board of Directors exist, the Board of Directors may take any action necessary to fulfill its obligations to preserve the integrity of the codes and standards development process and to protect the interests of the Association. The rules for petitioning the Board of Directors can be found in the Regulations Governing Petitions to the Board of Directors from Decisions of the Standards Council and in 1.7 of the Regs.
X. For More Information. The program for the Association Technical Meeting (as well as the NFPA website as information becomes available) should be consulted for the date on which each report scheduled for consideration at the meeting will be presented. For copies of the ROP and ROC as well as more information on NFPA rules and for up-to-date information on schedules and deadlines for processing NFPA documents, check the NFPA website (www.nfpa.org) or contact NFPA Codes & Standards Administration at (617-984-7246).
i
2010 Annual Revision Cycle ROP Contents
by NFPA Numerical Designation
Note: Documents appear in numerical order.
NFPA No. Type Action Title Page No.
25 P Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems .............. 25-1 30B P Code for the Manufacture and Storage of Aerosol Products ..................................................................... 30B-1 33 P Standard for Spray Application Using Flammable or Combustible Materials............................................. 33-1 34 P Standard for Dipping and Coating Processes Using Flammable or Combustible Liquids ........................... 34-1 To be retitled as Standard for Dipping, Coating, and Printing Processes Using Flammable or Combustible
Liquids 40 P Standard for the Storage and Handling of Cellulose Nitrate Film ............................................................... 40-1 58 P Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code ................................................................................................................... 58-1 73 P Electrical Inspection Code for Existing Dwellings ..................................................................................... 73-1 To be retitled as Standard for Electrical Inspections for Existing Dwellings 86 P Standard for Ovens and Furnaces ............................................................................................................... 86-1 87 N Recommended Practice for Fluid Heaters ................................................................................................... 87-1 88A P Standard for Parking Structures ............................................................................................................... 88A-1 96 P Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations ........................ 96-1 160 P Standard for the Use of Flame Effects Before an Audience ...................................................................... 160-1 303 P Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards ................................................................................ 303-1 307 P Standard for the Construction and Fire Protection of Marine Terminals, Piers, and Wharves .................. 307-1 312 P Standard for Fire Protection of Vessels During Construction, Conversion, Repair, and Lay-Up ............. 312 -1 502 P Standard for Road Tunnels, Bridges, and Other Limited Access Highways ............................................. 502-1 556 N Guide on Methods for Evaluating Fire Hazard to Occupants of Passenger Road Vehicles ....................... 556-1 654 P Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids ....................................................................................... 654-1 780 P Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems ................................................................. 780-1 1000 P Standard for Fire Service Professional Qualifications Accreditation and Certification Systems ............. 1000-1 1071 C Standard for Emergency Vehicle Technician Professional Qualifications .............................................. 1071-1 1126 P Standard for the Use of Pyrotechnics Before a Proximate Audience ...................................................... 1126-1 1145 P Guide for the Use of Class A Foams in Manual Structural Fire Fighting ................................................ 1145-1
TYPES OF ACTION
P Partial Revision C Complete Revision N New Document R Reconfirmation W Withdrawal
ii
2010 Annual Revision Cycle ROP Committees Reporting
Type Action Page No. Aerosol Products 30B Code for the Manufacture and Storage of Aerosol Products P 30B-1 Finishing Processes 33 Standard for Spray Application Using Flammable or Combustible Materials P 33-1 34 Standard for Dipping and Coating Processes Using Flammable or Combustible Liquids P 34-1 Forest and Rural Fire Protection 1145 Guide for the Use of Class A Foams in Manual Structural Fire Fighting P 1145-1 Garages and Parking Structures 88A Standard for Parking Structures P 88A-1 Handling and Conveying of Dusts, Vapors, and Gases
654 Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids
P
654-1
Hazard and Risk of Contents and Furnishings 556 Guide on Methods for Evaluating Fire Hazard to Occupants of Passenger Road Vehicles N 556-1 Hazardous Chemicals 40 Standard for the Storage and Handling of Cellulose Nitrate Film P 40-1 Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Systems
25 Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems P 25-1 Lightning Protection 780 Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems P 780-1 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 58 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code P 58-1 Marinas and Boatyards 303 Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards P 303-1 Marine Terminals 307 Standard for the Construction and Fire Protection of Marine Terminals, Piers, and Wharves P 307-1 National Electrical Code Electrical Systems Maintenance 73 Electrical Inspection Code for Existing Dwellings P 73-1 Ovens and Furnaces 86 Standard for Ovens and Furnaces P 86-1 87 Recommended Practice for Fluid Heaters N 87-1 Professional Qualifications Accreditation and Certification to Fire Service Professional Qualifications 1000 Standard for Fire Service Professional Qualifications Accreditation and Certification Systems P 1000-1 Emergency Vehicle Mechanic Technicians Professional Qualifications 1071 Standard for Emergency Vehicle Technician Professional Qualifications C 1071-1 Road Tunnel and Highway Fire Protection 502 Standard for Road Tunnels, Bridges, and Other Limited Access Highways P 502-1 Shipbuilding, Repair, and Lay-Up 312 Standard for Fire Protection of Vessels During Construction, Conversion, Repair, and Lay-Up P 312-1 Special Effects 160 Standard for the Use of Flame Effects Before an Audience P 160-1 1126 Standard for the Use of Pyrotechnics Before a Proximate Audience P 1126-1 Venting Systems for Cooking Appliances 96 Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations P 96-1
iii
COMMITTEE MEMBER CLASSIFICATIONS1,2,3,4
The following classifications apply to Committee members and represent their principal interest in the activity of the Committee. 1. M Manufacturer: A representative of a maker or marketer of a product, assembly, or system, or portion thereof,
that is affected by the standard. 2. U User: A representative of an entity that is subject to the provisions of the standard or that voluntarily uses the
standard. 3. IM Installer/Maintainer: A representative of an entity that is in the business of installing or maintaining a product,
assembly, or system affected by the standard. 4. L Labor: A labor representative or employee concerned with safety in the workplace. 5. RT Applied Research/Testing Laboratory: A representative of an independent testing laboratory or independent
applied research organization that promulgates and/or enforces standards. 6. E Enforcing Authority: A representative of an agency or an organization that promulgates and/or enforces
standards. 7. I Insurance: A representative of an insurance company, broker, agent, bureau, or inspection agency. 8. C Consumer: A person who is or represents the ultimate purchaser of a product, system, or service affected by the
standard, but who is not included in (2). 9. SE Special Expert: A person not representing (1) through (8) and who has special expertise in the scope of the
standard or portion thereof. NOTE 1: “Standard” connotes code, standard, recommended practice, or guide. NOTE 2: A representative includes an employee. NOTE 3: While these classifications will be used by the Standards Council to achieve a balance for Technical Committees, the Standards Council may determine that new classifications of member or unique interests need representation in order to foster the best possible Committee deliberations on any project. In this connection, the Standards Council may make such appointments as it deems appropriate in the public interest, such as the classification of “Utilities” in the National Electrical Code Committee. NOTE 4: Representatives of subsidiaries of any group are generally considered to have the same classification as the parent organization.
FORM FOR COMMENT ON NFPA REPORT ON PROPOSALS 2010 ANNUAL REVISION CYCLE
FINAL DATE FOR RECEIPT OF COMMENTS: 5:00 pm EDST, September 4, 2009
For further information on the standards-making process, please contact the Codes and Standards Administration at 617-984-7249 or visit www.nfpa.org/codes.
For technical assistance, please call NFPA at 1-800-344-3555.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Log #:
Date Rec’d:
Please indicate in which format you wish to receive your ROP/ROC electronic paper download (Note: If choosing the download option, you must view the ROP/ROC from our website; no copy will be sent to you.)
Date 8/1/200X Name John B. Smith Tel. No. 253-555-1234
Company Email
Street Address 9 Seattle St. City Tacoma State WA Zip 98402
***If you wish to receive a hard copy, a street address MUST be provided. Deliveries cannot be made to PO boxes.
Please indicate organization represented (if any) Fire Marshals Assn. of North America
1. (a) NFPA Document Title National Fire Alarm Code NFPA No. & Year NFPA 72, 200X ed.
(b) Section/Paragraph 4.4.1.1
2. Comment on Proposal No. (from ROP): 72-7
3. Comment Recommends (check one): new text revised text deleted text
4. Comment (include proposed new or revised wording, or identification of wording to be deleted): [Note: Proposed text should be in legislative format; i.e., use underscore to denote wording to be inserted (inserted wording) and strike-through to denote wording to be deleted (deleted wording).]
Delete exception.
5. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Comment: (Note: State the problem that would be resolved by your recommendation; give the specific reason for your Comment, including copies of tests, research papers, fire experience, etc. If more than 200 words, it may be abstracted for publication.)
A properly installed and maintained system should be free of ground faults. The occurrence of one or more ground faults should be required to cause a ‘trouble’ signal because it indicates a condition that could contribute to future malfunction of the system. Ground fault protection has been widely available on these systems for years and its cost is negligible. Requiring it on all systems will promote better installations, maintenance and reliability.
6. Copyright Assignment
(a) I am the author of the text or other material (such as illustrations, graphs) proposed in the Comment.
(b) Some or all of the text or other material proposed in this Comment was not authored by me. Its source is as follows: (please identify which material and provide complete information on its source)
I hereby grant and assign to the NFPA all and full rights in copyright in this Comment and understand that I acquire no rights in any publication of NFPA in which this Comment in this or another similar or analogous form is used. Except to the extent that I do not have authority to make an assignment in materials that I have identified in (b) above, I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this assignment.
Signature (Required)
PLEASE USE SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH COMMENT
Mail to: Secretary, Standards Council · National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park · Quincy, MA 02169-7471 OR
Fax to: (617) 770-3500 OR Email to: [email protected] 5/27/2009
FORM FOR COMMENT ON NFPA REPORT ON PROPOSALS 2010 ANNUAL REVISION CYCLE
FINAL DATE FOR RECEIPT OF COMMENTS: 5:00 pm EDST, September 4, 2009
For further information on the standards-making process, please contact the Codes and Standards Administration at 617-984-7249 or visit www.nfpa.org/codes.
For technical assistance, please call NFPA at 1-800-344-3555.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Log #:
Date Rec’d:
Please indicate in which format you wish to receive your ROP/ROC electronic paper download (Note: If choosing the download option, you must view the ROP/ROC from our website; no copy will be sent to you.)
Date Name Tel. No.
Company Email
Street Address City State Zip
***If you wish to receive a hard copy, a street address MUST be provided. Deliveries cannot be made to PO boxes.
Please indicate organization represented (if any)
1. (a) NFPA Document Title NFPA No. & Year
(b) Section/Paragraph
2. Comment on Proposal No. (from ROP):
3. Comment Recommends (check one): new text revised text deleted text
4. Comment (include proposed new or revised wording, or identification of wording to be deleted): [Note: Proposed text should be in legislative format; i.e., use underscore to denote wording to be inserted (inserted wording) and strike-through to denote wording to be deleted (deleted wording).]
5. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Comment: (Note: State the problem that would be resolved by your recommendation; give the specific reason for your Comment, including copies of tests, research papers, fire experience, etc. If more than 200 words, it may be abstracted for publication.)
6. Copyright Assignment
(a) I am the author of the text or other material (such as illustrations, graphs) proposed in the Comment.
(b) Some or all of the text or other material proposed in this Comment was not authored by me. Its source is as follows: (please identify which material and provide complete information on its source)
I hereby grant and assign to the NFPA all and full rights in copyright in this Comment and understand that I acquire no rights in any publication of NFPA in which this Comment in this or another similar or analogous form is used. Except to the extent that I do not have authority to make an assignment in materials that I have identified in (b) above, I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this assignment.
Signature (Required)
PLEASE USE SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH COMMENT
Mail to: Secretary, Standards Council · National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park · Quincy, MA 02169-7471 OR
Fax to: (617) 770-3500 OR Email to: [email protected] 5/27/2009
Sequence of Events Leading to Issuance of an NFPA Committee Document
Step 1 Call for Proposals
▼ Proposed new document or new edition of an existing document is entered into one of two yearly revision cycles, and a Call for Proposals is published.
Step 2 Report on Proposals (ROP)
▼ Committee meets to act on Proposals, to develop its own Proposals, and to prepare its Report.
▼ Committee votes by written ballot on Proposals. If two-thirds approve, Report goes forward. Lacking two-thirds approval, Report returns to Committee.
▼ Report on Proposals (ROP) is published for public review and comment.
Step 3 Report on Comments (ROC)
▼ Committee meets to act on Public Comments to develop its own Comments, and to prepare its report.
▼ Committee votes by written ballot on Comments. If two-thirds approve, Report goes forward. Lacking two-thirds approval, Report returns to Committee.
▼ Report on Comments (ROC) is published for public review.
Step 4 Association Technical Meeting
▼ “Notices of intent to make a motion” are filed, are reviewed, and valid motions are certified for presentation at the Association Technical Meeting. (“Consent Documents” that have no certified motions bypass the Association Technical Meeting and proceed to the Standards Council for issuance.)
▼ NFPA membership meets each June at the Association Technical Meeting and acts on Technical Committee Reports (ROP and ROC) for documents with “certified amending motions.”
▼ Committee(s) vote on any amendments to Report approved at NFPA Annual Membership Meeting.
Step 5 Standards Council Issuance
▼ Notification of intent to file an appeal to the Standards Council on Association action must be filed within 20 days of the NFPA Annual Membership Meeting.
▼ Standards Council decides, based on all evidence, whether or not to issue document or to take other action, including hearing any appeals.
The Association Technical Meeting
The process of public input and review does not end with the publication of the ROP and ROC. Following the completion of the Proposal and Comment periods, there is yet a further opportunity for debate and discussion through the Association Technical Meeting that takes place at the NFPA Annual Meeting.
The Association Technical Meeting provides an opportunity for the final Technical Committee Report (i.e., the ROP and ROC) on each proposed new or revised code or standard to be presented to the NFPA membership for the debate and consideration of motions to amend the Report. The specific rules for the types of motions that can be made and who can make them are set forth in NFPA’s rules, which should always be consulted by those wishing to bring an issue before the membership at an Association Technical Meeting. The following presents some of the main features of how a Report is handled.
The Filing of a Notice of Intent to Make a Motion. Before making an allowable motion at an Association Technical Meeting, the intended maker of the motion must file, in advance of the session, and within the published deadline, a Notice of Intent to Make a Motion. A Motions Committee appointed by the Standards Council then reviews all notices and certifies all amending motions that are proper. The Motions Committee can also, in consultation with the makers of the motions, clarify the intent of the motions and, in certain circumstances, combine motions that are dependent on each other together so that they can be made in one single motion. A Motions Committee report is then made available in advance of the meeting listing all certified motions. Only these Certified Amending Motions, together with certain allowable Follow-Up Motions (that is, motions that have become necessary as a result of previous successful amending motions) will be allowed at the Association Technical Meeting.
Consent Documents. Often there are codes and standards up for consideration by the membership that will be noncontroversial and no proper Notices of Intent to Make a Motion will be filed. These “Consent Documents” will bypass the Association Technical Meeting and head straight to the Standards Council for issuance. The remaining documents are then forwarded to the Association Technical Meeting for consideration of the NFPA membership.
What Amending Motions Are Allowed. The Technical Committee Reports contain many Proposals and Comments that the Technical Committee has rejected or revised in whole or in part. Actions of the Technical Committee published in the ROP may also eventually be rejected or revised by the Technical Committee during the development of its ROC. The motions allowed by NFPA rules provide the opportunity to propose amendments to the text of a proposed code or standard based on these published Proposals, Comments, and Committee actions. Thus, the list of allowable motions include motions to accept Proposals and Comments in whole or in part as submitted or as modified by a Technical Committee action. Motions are also available to reject an accepted Comment in whole or part. In addition, Motions can be made to return an entire Technical Committee Report or a portion of the Report to the Technical Committee for further study.
The NFPA Annual Meeting, also known as the NFPA Conference & Expo, takes place in June of each year. A second Fall membership meeting was discontinued in 2004, so the NFPA Technical Committee Report Session now runs once each year at the Annual Meeting in June.
Who Can Make Amending Motions. NFPA rules also define those authorized to make amending motions. In many cases, the maker of the motion is limited by NFPA rules to the original submitter of the Proposal or Comment or his or her duly authorized representative. In other cases, such as a Motion to Reject an accepted Comment, or to Return a Technical Committee Report or a portion of a Technical Committee Report for Further Study, anyone can make these motions. For a complete explanation, the NFPA Regs should be consulted.
Action on Motions at the Association Technical Meeting. In order to actually make a Certified Amending Motion at the Association Technical Meeting, the maker of the motion must sign in at least an hour before the session begins. In this way a final list of motions can be set in advance of the session. At the session, each proposed document up for consideration is presented by a motion to adopt the Technical Committee Report on the document. Following each such motion, the presiding officer in charge of the session opens the floor to motions on the document from the final list of Certified Amending Motions followed by any permissible Follow-Up Motions. Debate and voting on each motion proceeds in accordance with NFPA rules. NFPA membership is not required in order to make or speak to a motion, but voting is limited to NFPA members who have joined at least 180 days prior to the Association Technical Meeting and have registered for the meeting. At the close of debate on each motion, voting takes place, and the motion requires a majority vote to carry. In order to amend a Technical Committee Report, successful amending motions must be confirmed by the responsible Technical Committee, which conducts a written ballot on all successful amending motions following the meeting and prior to the document being forwarded to the Standards Council for issuance.
Standards Council Issuance
One of the primary responsibilities of the NFPA Standards Council, as the overseer of the NFPA codes and standards development process, is to act as the official issuer of all NFPA codes and standards. When it convenes to issue NFPA documents, it also hears any appeals related to the document. Appeals are an important part of assuring that all NFPA rules have been followed and that due process and fairness have been upheld throughout the codes and standards development process. The Council considers appeals both in writing and through the conduct of hearings at which all interested parties can participate. It decides appeals based on the entire record of the process as well as all submissions on the appeal. After deciding all appeals related to a document before it, the Council, if appropriate, proceeds to issue the document as an official NFPA code or standard. Subject only to limited review by the NFPA Board of Directors, the decision of the Standards Council is final, and the new NFPA code or standard becomes effective twenty days after Standards Council issuance.
34-1
Report on Proposals A2010 — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 34
Report of the Committee on
Finishing Processes
Steven J. Gunsel, ChairSGTechnologies, LLC, OH [SE]
Thomas G. Euson, Secretary3S Incorporated, IN [IM]
William C. Anderson, Approved Fire Protection Company, Inc., MI [IM] Rep. National Association of Fire Equipment Distributors John D. Bloomgren, Infinity Precision, LLC, MN [M]Dean Doherty, General Motors North America, MI [U] Rep. NFPA Industrial Fire Protection Section Robert J. Feldkamp, Nordson Corporation, OH [M] Rob J. Friberg, Liberty Mutual Property, WI [I] Rep. Property Casualty Insurers Association of AmericaPaul B. Gentry, Zurich Services Corporation, TN [I] John Gokey, Tyco Fire Suppression & Building Products, WI [M] Ben Greene, City of Englewood, CO [E] Brian K. Haynack, Sherwin-Williams Company, OH [M] Rep. American Industrial Hygiene Association Dennis P. Jenkins, Paragon Risk Engineering, NC [I] Rep. American Insurance Services Group Steven D. Jensen, 3M Company, MN [U] John S. Jurasic, Jurasic Equipment Inc., CO [IM] Martin J. Korecky, Rohm and Haas Company, PA [M] John C. Larson, DuPont Performance Coatings, PA [M] John McKnight, National Marine Manufacturers Association, DC [U] Rep. Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. Kenneth A. Mier, Amerex Corporation, AL [M] Rep. Fire Equipment Manufacturers’ Association Lowell Miles, Miles Fiberglass & Composites, OR [U] Rep. American Composites Manufacturers Association Gregory M. Murin, Travelers Insurance Company, CT [I] G. Randall Nance, Automated Fire Systems, Inc., NC [IM] Allen L. Pirro, Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc., NY [RT] Douglas A. Rivord, Graco, Inc., MN [M] Don Scarbrough, Elyria, OH [SE] Ronald A. Schulz, XL Global Asset Protection Services, MI [I] Michael A. Slowinske, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT]Barry Thomas, BECCA Inc., GA [M]
Alternates
Donald W. Ankele, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] (Alt. to Michael A. Slowinske) Mark A. Bowman, XL Global Asset Protection Services, OH [I] (Alt. to Ronald A. Schulz) Bradley A. Byron, Graco Incorporated, MN [M] (Alt. to Douglas A. Rivord) Larry B. Cox, American Composites Manufacturers Association, VA [U] (Alt. to Lowell Miles) Matthew M. Euson, 3S Incorporated, IN [IM] (Alt. to Thomas G. Euson) Edward L. Jones, Nordson Corporation, OH [M] (Alt. to Robert J. Feldkamp)
John R. Moore, E. I. DuPont Company, PA [M] (Alt. to John C. Larson) Kenneth J. Pilat, Liberty Mutual Property, FL [I] (Alt. to Rob J. Friberg) James M. Shea, Tyco/SimplexGrinnell LP, NH [M] (Alt. to John Gokey)Dale W. Soos, Intertek, NY [RT] (Alt. to Allen L. Pirro) James W. Taylor, Zurich Services Corporation, TN [I] (Alt. to Paul B. Gentry) [34 Supplemental ballot only] William Vegso, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, NC [M] (Alt. to Kenneth A. Mier)
Nonvoting
Robert B. Bell, US Department of Labor, DC [E]Matthew I. Chibbaro, US Department of Labor, DC [E] (Alt. to Robert B. Bell)Matthew I. Chibbaro, US Department of Labor, DC [E] (Alt. to William R. Hamilton) [34 Supplemental ballot only]William R. Hamilton, US Department of Labor, DC [E] (Alt. to Matthew I. Chibbaro) [34 Supplemental ballot only]W. H. White, Holland, OH [SE] (Member Emeritus)
Staff Liaison: Robert P. Benedetti
Committee Scope: This Committee shall have primary responsibility for documents on safeguarding against the fire and explosion hazards associated with spray application processes, dipping processes, coating processes, and other similar processes, including glass fiber/resin fabrication processes, except for certain dipping processes that are within the scope of the Committee on Ovens and Furnaces.
This list represents the membership at the time the Committee was balloted on the text of this edition. Since that time, changes in the membership may have occurred. A key to classifications is found at the front of this book.
The Technical Committee on Finishing Processes is presenting Two Reports for adoption, as follows:
Report I: The Technical Committee proposes for adoption, amend-ments to NFPA 33, Standard for Spray Application Using Flammable or Combustible Materials, 2007 edition. NFPA 33-2007 is published in Volume 3 of the 2009 National Fire Codes and in separate pamphlet form.
The report on NFPA 33 has been submitted to letter ballot of the Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, which consists of 27 voting members. The results of the balloting, after circulation of any negative votes, can be found in the report.
Report II: The Technical Committee proposes for adoption, amendments to NFPA 34, Standard for Dipping and Coating Processes Using Flammable or Combustible Liquids, 2007 edition. NFPA 34-2007 is published in Volume 3 of the 2009 National Fire Codes and in separate pamphlet form.
When adopted NFPA 34 will be retitled as NFPA 34, Standard for Dipping, Coating, and Printing Processes Using Flammable or Combustible Liquids
The report on NFPA 34 has been submitted to letter ballot of the Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, which consists of 27 voting members. The results of the balloting, after circulation of any negative votes, can be found in the report.
34-2
Report on Proposals A2010 — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 34 1.1.65 This standard shall not apply to electrostatic fluidized bed powder application. (See Chapter 15 Section 15.13 of NFPA 33, Standard for Spray Application Using Flammable or Combustible Materials.) Substantiation: This proposal accomplishes the following: 1. It makes editorial changes to eliminate the redundant use of the phrase “dipping and coating” in the scope and elsewhere in the standard. 2. It adds a new 1.1.2 to specifically address vapor degreasing and vapor cleaning processes that have historically been within the scope of NFPA 34, but have up to now been specifically identified as “cleaning” operations. This could be confused with the requirements for cleaning in 10.5. 3. It deletes the word “electrostatic” in (old) 1.1.5, because all fluidized bed processes are covered by NFPA 33. 4. It specifically adds to the scope the various types of printing process, if they use flammable or combustible liquid inks. With respect to Item 4 above, the Technical Committee has concluded that printing processes are within the scope of NFPA 34 for the following reasons: - There is currently no other accepted standard that addresses the fire hazards of printing processes, either in the NFPA National Fire Codes or elsewhere. - The hazards of printing processes using flammable and combustible liquids are similar to those of the other processes covered by NFPA 34, particularly roll coating. All involve the process of depositing a flammable or combustible liquid on a web, sheet, or other substrate. - All of the processes to be covered in NFPA 34 involve the primary fire hazards of the storage, transfer, application, and use of flammable and combustible liquids. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-5 Log #CP6 Final Action: Accept (1.2.1 1.2.2, A.1.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Replace “dipping and coating” with “dipping, coating, and printing”. Substantiation: See Committee Proposal 34-4 (Log #CP53). Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-6 Log #CP7 Final Action: Accept (1.3) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: Chapters 4 through 10 and Chapter 12 shall apply to all dipping and coating processes within the scope of this standard. Chapter 11 shall apply only to dipping and coating processes that include electrostatic detearing systems. Substantiation: Editorial improvement so that all covered processes need not be listed. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 21 Negative: 1 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Negative: EUSON, T.: This needs to be revisited to make sure we didn’t include “printing” in areas that do not apply to this industry. a. For example, Chapter 5 does not apply to “printing”. b. Chapter 6 needs to have printing “figures” added for clarification, otherwise it doesn’t make sense to include printing in this chapter. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-7 Log #CP54 Final Action: Accept (2.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: 2.2 NFPA Publications. National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471. NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers, 2010 2007 edition. NFPA 11, Standard for Low-, Medium-, and High-Expansion Foam, 2010 2005 edition. NFPA 12, Standard on Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems, 2008 2005 edition. NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2010 2007 edition.
_______________________________________________________________ 34-1 Log #CP1 Final Action: Accept (Entire Document) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Review entire document to: 1) Update any extracted material by preparing separate proposals to do so, and 2) review and update references to other organizations documents, by preparing proposal(s) as required. Substantiation: To conform to the NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-2 Log #CP2 Final Action: Accept (Title) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise title of NFPA 34 to read: Standard for Dipping, and Coating, and Printing Processes Using Flammable or Combustible Liquids Substantiation: Revise title to reflect expansion of the scope of the document to include printing. See also Committee Proposal 34-4 (Log #CP53). Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: I was not able to attend the February 3-4, 2009 meeting. Therefore, I did not hear the Technical Committee Chair’s brief overview of objectives of the meeting with emphasis on the incorporation of requirements for printing processes into NFPA 34. Since objections were raised by representatives of various Printing Associations at the previous meeting via written correspondence, I was not able to resolve these concerns in my mind and therefore, I have abstained from voting on all noted proposal nos related to Printing Processes in this Ballot. _______________________________________________________________ 34-3 Log #CP9 Final Action: Accept (Entire Document) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Replace “dipping and coating” with “dipping, coating, and printing” wherever it appears in the Chapter titles. Change “dipping and coating processes” to “processes” everywhere else in Chapters 4 through 12. Substantiation: Since most of the requirements in NFPA 34 apply to all processes within its scope, there is no need to further identify the word “processes”. Where a particular requirement is specific to a process, that process will be named. See also Committee Proposal 34-4 (Log #CP53). Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-4 Log #CP53 Final Action: Accept (1.1) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise 1.1 to read as follows: 1.1.1* This standard shall apply to dipping, roll coating, flow coating, curtain coating, printing, cleaning, and similar processes, hereinafter referred to as “coating processes” or “processes”, in which articles or materials are passed through tanks, vats, containers, or process equipment that contain flammable or combustible liquids, including but not limited to dipping, roll coating, flow coating, curtain coating, and cleaning. A.1.1.1 Where a requirement applies to a particular process, the name of that process will be stated. 1.1.2 This standard shall also apply to cleaning processes that utilize a solvent vapor, such as vapor degreasing processes. 1.1.32 This standard shall also apply to dipping and coating processes that use water-borne, water-based, and water-reducible materials that contain flammable or combustible liquids or that produce combustible deposits or residues. 1.1.43 This standard shall not apply to dipping and coating processes that use only noncombustible liquids. 1.1.54 This standard shall not apply to dipping and coating processes that use a liquid that does not have a fire point when tested in accordance with ASTM D 92, Standard Test Method for Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup, up to the boiling point of the liquid or up to a temperature at which the sample being tested shows an obvious physical change.
34-3
Report on Proposals A2010 — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 34 _______________________________________________________________ 34-12 Log #2 Final Action: Accept (2.3.5) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Bob Eugene, Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Recommendation: Revise text as follows: 2.3.5 UL Publications Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Rd., Northbrook, IL 60062-2096. ANSI/UL 2208, Standard for Solvent Distillation Units, 1998 2005, revised 2006. Substantiation: Update referenced standard to include most recent revisions. Update title of UL 2208 to reflect ANSI approval. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-13 Log #CP59 Final Action: Accept (2.4) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: 2.4 References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections. NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2008 2003 edition. NFPA 70, National Electrical Code®, 2011 2005 edition. NFPA 220, Standard on Types of Building Construction, 2009 2006 edition. Substantiation: Update references to extracted material from NFPA publications to current editions in accordance with NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-14 Log #CP60 Final Action: Accept (3.3.3 Container) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: 3.3.3 Container. Any vessel of 450 L (119 gal) or less capacity used for transporting or storing liquids. [30, 2008 2003] 3.3.3.1 Closed Container. A container as herein defined, so sealed by means of a lid or other device that neither liquid nor vapor will escape from it at ordinary temperatures. [30, 2008 2003] Substantiation: Update extract reference to current edition of source document. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-15 Log #CP8 Final Action: Accept (3.3.7 Liquid) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Replace the current definition of “Liquid” with the following: Any material that (1) has a fluidity greater than that of 300 penetration asphalt when tested in accordance with ASTM D 5, Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials, or (2) is a viscous substance for which a specific melting point cannot be determined but that is determined to be a liquid in accordance with ASTM D 4359, Standard Test for Determining Whether a Material is a Liquid or a Solid. [30, 2008] Substantiation: Update definition extracted from NFPA 30-2008 Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-16 Log #CP61 Final Action: Accept (3.3.8 Noncombustible Material) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: 3.3.8 Noncombustible Material. A material that, in the form in which it is used and under the conditions anticipated, will not ignite, burn, support combustion, or release flammable vapors when subjected to fire or heat. Materials that are reported as passing ASTM E 136 are considered noncombustible materials. [220, 2009 2006] Substantiation: Update extract reference to current edition of source document. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G.
NFPA 15, Standard for Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection, 2007 edition. NFPA 17, Standard for Dry Chemical Extinguishing Systems, 2009 2002 edition. NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2008 2003 edition. NFPA 33, Standard for Spray Application Using Flammable or Combustible Materials, 2011 2007 edition. NFPA 70, National Electrical Code®, 2011 2005 edition. NFPA 72®, National Fire Alarm Code®, 2010 2007 edition. NFPA 91, Standard for Exhaust Systems for Air Conveying of Vapors, Gases, Mists, and Noncombustible Particulate Solids, 2010 2004 edition. NFPA 2001, Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems, 2008 2004 edition. Substantiation: Update NFPA referenced publications to current editions in accordance with NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-8 Log #CP55 Final Action: Accept (2.3.1) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: 2.3.1 AIHA Publications. American Industrial Hygiene Association, 2700 Prosperity Avenue, Suite 250, Fairfax, VA 22031. ANSI/AIHA Z9.7, American National Standard for the Recirculation of Air from Industrial Process Exhaust Systems, 2007 1998 Substantiation: Update referenced publications to current editions in accordance with NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-9 Log #CP56 Final Action: Accept (2.3.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: 2.3.2 ANSI Publications. American National Standards Institute, Inc., 25 West 43rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036. ANSI Z535, Safety Signs Series IS, 2002 Substantiation: This represents a series of several documents and does not have an edition date. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-10 Log #CP57 Final Action: Accept (2.3.3) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: 2.3.3 ASME Publications. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, 2007 2004. Substantiation: Update referenced publications to current editions in accordance with NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-11 Log #CP58 Final Action: Accept (2.3.4) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: 2.3.4 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. ASTM D 5, Standard Method of Test for Penetration for Bituminous Materials, 2006 1997. ASTM D 92, Standard Test Method for Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup, 2005 1998. ASTM E 136, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750°C, 2004 1999. Substantiation: Update referenced publications to current editions in accordance with NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G.
34-4
Report on Proposals A2010 — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 34 _______________________________________________________________ 34-18c Log #CP16 Final Action: Accept (5.5) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise 5.5 to read: To prevent the overflow of burning liquid from a the dipping or coating tank if a fire in the tank actuates automatic sprinklers, one or more of the following shall be done: (1) Drainboards shall be arranged so that sprinkler discharge will not flow into the tank. (2) The tank Tanks shall be equipped with automatic-closing covers. (3) The tank Tanks shall be equipped with overflow pipes. (See Section 5.6.) Substantiation: Regarding the first deletion, this requirement applies regardless of the process. The other two deletions are for editorial improvement. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-18d Log #CP17 Final Action: Accept (5.5) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: The liquid in any the dipping or coating tank shall be maintained at a level that is at least 150 mm (6 in.) below the top of the tank to allow effective application of extinguishing agents in the event of fire. Substantiation: Editorial improvement Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Comment on Affirmative: SLOWINSKE, M.: Suggest editing to maintain the language that the committee has accepted for 18b and 18c. Revise to read: The liquid in any the dipping or coating tank that holds flammable or combustible liquids shall be maintained at a level that is at least 150 mm (6 in.) below the top of the tank to allow effective application of extinguishing agents in the event of fire. _______________________________________________________________ 34-18e Log #CP18 Final Action: Accept (5.9.1, 5.9.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: In both 5.9.1 and 5.9.2, add an exception to read: Exception: This requirement shall not apply to web or sheet transport systems. Substantiation: In printing processes, stopping the transport of the substrate during a fire event tends to result in more, not less damage to the equipment. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Comment on Affirmative: SLOWINSKE, M.: Suggest adding the words “in printing processes” at the end of the exception. The nature of a web or sheet transport system may not be readily known to a person who is not involved in the printing industry. _______________________________________________________________ 34-19 Log #CP21 Final Action: Accept (6.1) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise the text of 6.1 to read: Chapter 6 shall apply to electrical wiring and electrical utilization equipment that is used in or on, or is attached to the dipping, and coating, or printing equipment, or is in the vicinity of such the dipping and coating equipment. This chapter shall also apply to other sources of ignition. Substantiation: See Committee Proposal 34-4 (Log #CP53). Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). Comment on Affirmative: ANKELE, D.: In the same manner as the title has been amended, 6.1 needs to read “and printing...” The word “or” is incorrect.
_______________________________________________________________ 34-17 Log #CP10 Final Action: Accept (4.2.1 (New)) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Add a new 4.2.1 to read: Storage of rolled paper or other combustible substrate beyond one day’s operating supply shall be separated from the printing process area by a one-hour fire partition or shall be protected in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, for the appropriate commodity. Substantiation: With expansion of the scope of the standard to address printing processes, NFPA 34 needs to provide for a fire separation between storage areas for the substrate being printed or there needs to be a reference to the appropriate sprinkler system design criteria in NFPA 13, so that the process is protected from exposure to a fire originating in the storage area or vice versa. The option for sprinklers is to allow rolled paper etc. to equilibrate to the ambient conditions of the process area, a demonstrated need for printing processes. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 21 Negative: 1 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Negative: EUSON, T.: The printing industry has expressed serious concerns about the one day supply as it is necessary to “condition” or “acclimate” the paper or other substrate to the same environmental conditions as the press. We should consider their concerns on this item. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-18 Log #CP11 Final Action: Accept (4.5) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: Dipping, and coating, and printing processes shall not be located in any building that is classified as an assembly, educational, day care, health care, ambulatory health care, detention/correctional, institutional, or residential occupancy, unless they are located in an area room that is separated both vertically and horizontally from all surrounding areas by construction having a fire resistance rating of at least 2 hours and that is protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system designed and installed in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. Substantiation: Editorial improvement. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-18a Log #CP13 Final Action: Accept (5.2.1.1 (New) ) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Add a new 5.2.1.1 to read: Rolls shall be permitted to be covered with polymeric or other combustible materials. Substantiation: Printing processes use rolls that frequently use a polymeric or similar outer surface. This new paragraph is essentially a necessary exception to the requirement of 5.2.1. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Comment on Affirmative: SLOWINSKE, M.: The proposed addition of 5.2.1.1 is incomplete with respect to the description of the “rolls” which are permitted to be covered with polymeric or other combustible material. Is this a part of a printing press or a roll of paper? Ambiguous requirements will either be misapplied or not enforced. _______________________________________________________________ 34-18b Log #CP15 Final Action: Accept (5.3) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise the text of 5.3 to read: The top of any the dipping or coating tank that holds flammable or combustible liquids shall be at least 150 mm (6 in.) above the floor. Substantiation: The word “tank” does not need to be modified. This requirement is intended to apply only to those tanks holding flammable and combustible liquids. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G.
34-5
Report on Proposals A2010 — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 34 vapor source does not exceed 0.5 m2 (5 ft2), the contents of the dip tank, ink fountain, ink reservoir, or ink tank do not exceed 19 L (5 gal), and the vapor concentration during operating and shutdown periods does not exceed 25 percent of the lower flammable limit. Substantiation: See Committee Proposal 34-4 (Log #CP53). Added text correlates with expansion of the standard to cover printing processes. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-25 Log #CP28 Final Action: Accept (6.5) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise title of section to read: Areas Adjacent to Enclosed Dipping and Coating Processes. Substantiation: Section 6.5 is specific to dipping and coating processes. It does not cover printing processes. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-26 Log #CP29 Final Action: Accept (6.8) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: In Section 6.8, number the current text as 6.8.1 and add a new 6.8.2 to read: 6.8.2* Provision shall be made to dissipate static electric charges from all nonconductive substrates in printing processes. A.6.8.2 See Section 10.2 of NFPA 77, Recommended Practice on Static Electricity, for recommendations specific to printing processes. Substantiation: This added text, including the referenced material in NFPA 77, is specific to printing processes. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 21 Negative: 1 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Negative: ANKELE, D.: The requirement is unenforceable as it is proposed. A reference to NFPA 77, Section 10 will provide requirements for the processes where this action must be taken. I propose revision as follows: 6.8.2* Provisions shall be made to dissipate static electric charges from all nonconductive substrates in printing processes in accordance with NFPA 77, Section 10. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-27 Log #3 Final Action: Reject (8.5.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Mindy Wang, Ampco Safety Tools Recommendation: To add new text to read as follows: 8.5.2 Where liquids are used or handled, means shall be provided to clean and dispose of leaks or spills in a prompt and safe manner. Use clean spark resistant tools to collect absorbed material. Substantiation: ● NFPA 34 can better mitigate the flammability hazards by specifying the use of spark resistant tools. Without this specification, steel tools are likely to be used which can be an ignition source. ● NFPA 921, Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations 2008 Edition, Chapter 5 Basic Fire Science Table 5.7.1.1 Reported Burning and Sparking Temperature of Selected Ignition Sources under Mechanical Sparks lists a Steel tool temperature at 2550°F. When working with flammable gases, liquids or vapors, a potential hazard arises because of the possibility that sparks produced by steel or iron tools can become an ignition source. ● Recognizing the potential for steel tools to be an ignition source in flammable environment, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) provides guidance in booklet 3080 Hand and Power Tools, 2002 revised, “iron and steel hand tools may produce sparks that can be an ignition source around flammable substances. Where this hazard exists, spark-resistant tools should be used.” ● Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG) requires the use of “non-sparking” tools to handle spills or leaks for flammable liquids – Guide 127 Flammable Liquids (Polar/Water-Miscible), Guide 128 Flammable Liquids (Non-Polar/Water-Immiscible), Guide 129 Flammable Liquids (Polar/Water-Miscible/Noxious), Guide 130 Flammable Liquids (Non-Polar/Water-Immiscible/
_______________________________________________________________ 34-20 Log #CP22 Final Action: Accept (6.2.1, 6.2.1.1, 6.2.3) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Delete “dipping and coating”. Substantiation: The requirements of Chapter 6 apply to all processes within the scope of the standard. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-21 Log #CP24 Final Action: Accept (6.2.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: Open flames, spark-producing equipment or processes, and equipment whose exposed surfaces exceed the autoignition temperature of the flammable or combustible dipping or coating liquid being used shall not be located in the dipping or coating process area or in surrounding areas that are classified as Division 2 or Zone 2. Substantiation: Only flammable and combustible liquids are intended to be covered by this requirement and the requirement applies to all processes within the scope of the standard. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-22 Log #CP25 Final Action: Accept (6.4) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: Electrical wiring and electrical utilization equipment located adjacent to open dipping and coating processes shall meet the requirements of 6.4.1 through 6.4.4 and Figure 6.4(a), Figure 6.4(b), Figure 6.4(c), or Figure 6.4(d), or Figure 6.4.(e), whichever is applicable. Add a new Figure 6.4(e), Electrical area classification around a typical printing press to cover printing presses. [Figure 6.4(e) to be inserted at ROC stage.] Substantiation: Section 6.4 is applicable to all processes within the scope of the standard. A new Figure 6.4(e) will be provided at the ROC stage. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-23 Log #CP26 Final Action: Accept (6.4.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: Electrical wiring and electrical utilization equipment located within 1525 mm (5 ft) of a vapor source shall be suitable for Class I, Division 1 or Class I, Zone 1 locations. The space area inside a the dip tank, ink fountain, ink reservoir, or ink tank shall be classified as Class I, Division 1 or Class I, Zone 0, whichever is applicable. Substantiation: Added text correlates with expansion of the standard to cover printing processes. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-24 Log #CP27 Final Action: Accept (6.4.4 Exception) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: Exception: This space shall be permitted to be nonclassified for purposes of electrical installations if the surface area of the
34-6
Report on Proposals A2010 — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 34 _______________________________________________________________ 34-29 Log #CP36 Final Action: Accept (9.8) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise the text to read: Fire protection systems shall be designed and installed so as to minimize splashing of the solvent or coating materials due to discharge of the fire suppression agent. Substantiation: Clarification that this applies to splashing that might occur due to operation of a fire suppression system. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-30 Log #CP37 Final Action: Accept (9.11 (New) ) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Add a new Section 9.11 to read: 9.11 Automatic Fire Protection for Printing Processes 9.11.1 Automatic Sprinklers 9.11.1 1* Automatic sprinkler protection shall be provided for the following areas: (a) all printing process areas that contain ordinary combustibles, flammable or combustible liquids, or combustible construction (b) all printing operations areas, at the ceiling level (c) areas of printing presses that are shielded from ceiling sprinklers and where combustibles exist Exception: Where carbon dioxide protection is provided for such areas, sprinklers are not required. A.9.11.1.1 Particular attention shall be given to areas beneath platforms and beneath press units, such as reel areas of newspaper plants, where fire may result in extensive damage to press supporting members and to the press itself. Consideration should be given to providing sprinkler protection for steel plating and structural members surrounding the press at operating floor level, if they are subject to deposits of combustible ink on the underside. Substantiation: This new section provides appropriate requirements for fire protection for printing processes. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 21 Negative: 1 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Negative: GOKEY, J.: This section implies the use of water only for the protection of printing processes. Other systems, such as carbon dioxide systems, can be used to protect printing processes. This section should be rewritten to state: 9.11 Automatic Fire Protection for Printing Process Areas Areas in which printing operations are conducted shall be protected with approved automatic sprinkler systems that are designed and installed in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. 9.11.1* Automatic sprinkler protection shall be provided for the following areas: (a) all printing process areas that contain ordinary combustibles, flammable or combustible liquids, or combustible construction (b) all printing operations areas, at the ceiling level (c) areas of printing presses that are shielded from ceiling sprinklers and where combustibles exist Exception: Where another fire protection system is provided for such areas, sprinklers are not required. 9.11.2 Automatic Fire Protection for Printing Processes An automatic fire protection system, installed in accordance with Section 9.3, shall be provided for printing processes. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). Comment on Affirmative: EUSON, T.: This item mixes building/area protection with press protection. We should split this as there are different considerations for each. a. We list CO2 (carbon dioxide) in the exception. Where Carbon dioxide is provided, we state that sprinklers are not required. I don’t think it was our intent to suggest carbon dioxide for the building protection. _______________________________________________________________ 34-31 Log #CP38 Final Action: Accept (10.2.1, 10.2.3) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Replace “dipping and coating” with the word “process”. Substantiation: These requirements are intended to apply to all processes within the scope of the standard. Committee Meeting Action: Accept
Noxious), Guide 131 Flammable Liquids – Toxic, Guide 132 Flammable Liquids - Corrosive ● Manufacturers of flammable liquids regularly require the use of “non-sparking” tools under Accidental Release Measures and Handling and Storage sections in the MSDS’s for their products. A few examples: 3M, CITGO, Aldrich Chemical, Fisher Scientific, Dow, Airgas, Rust-Oleum, ICI Paints, and Mayco Colors. ● A few documented incidents: ● OSHA inspection # 101003176, an employee was working alone near a coating pot containing a solution of 50 percent xylene, 15 percent rubber, and 35 percent filler. The pot held approximately 76 liters of the solution. The pot was part of a coating tower for coating fiberglass with a rubber solution. An explosion occurred, and the explosion and ensuing fire burned the employee over a large area of his body. He died of his injuries. Grounded 208-liter drums of the coating solution had exploded, and the explosion ignited the xylene. All electrical wiring and controls were explosion proof. The only possible sources of ignition were tools and a key ring worn by the employee. ● OSHA inspection # 109850131, the employer was using a Rotogravure coating press to coat plastic sheeting. The coating, which contained toluene and MEK, was flammable, and an explosion occurred on the input side of the drying tunnel. The most likely cause was static electricity, but flammables were also being mishandled at the site. No information on employee injuries was provided. ● OSHA inspection # 2272953, two employees were assigned the job of tending a 100 gallon (water jacket) reactor kettle of methyl methacrylate in the mixing room. Employee #1 used a metal wrench (visegrips) to pry open the cover of a kettle. The wrench handle struck the angle iron support for the agitator motor, producing a spark. Employee #2 noticed the spark, which was immediately followed by a massive “fire ball”. Both employees were engulfed in the fireball. Employee #3 came to the area to assist the other employees. The investigation states that non-sparking tools were not provided for the employees. All three employees received first and second degree burns on their face, arms and abdomen. Employee #2 also received some third degree burns. All three employees were hospitalized. ● OSHA inspection # 124661588, employee #1 was performing her normal job duties of operating an acetone polishing line. Employee #1 shut down the line to take a break. On her way to that break, she picked up several screwdriver handles that had earlier missed their intended bucket when automatically dropped from a machine. When Employee #1 dropped them in the bucket, a flash fire occurred, burning Employee #1. She received a 1st degree burn to her left forearm. Everything electrical in the work area was explosion proof. The bucket was constructed of cardboard with two plastic liners. ● Without the specification for spark resistant tools, steel tools are likely to be used which can be a source of ignition. Committee Meeting Action: Reject Committee Statement: The use of non-sparking tools was dealt with by the Technical Committee during the last revision cycle. Other than the incidents cited by the submitter, the Technical Committee is not aware of a pattern of fire incidents in dipping and coating operations that can be linked to the use of ferrous tools. The Technical Committee cites the work of the American Petroleum Institute (API 2214), which refuted the need for non-sparking tools, except in very special circumstances. Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-28 Log #CP35 Final Action: Accept (9.5.1(4)) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: Stop the process, including but not limited to conveyors, rolls, and webs or sheet transport systems. Substantiation: Sheet-fed substrates are covered by this requirement as well. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 21 Negative: 1 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Negative: EUSON, T.: The printing industry has expressed concerns that stopping the web in the oven or dryer will actually increase the risk of spreading the fire. This is especially true with the use of UV curable coatings. The heat from the lamps will ignite the paper within seconds. We should consider their concerns on this item. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2).
34-7
Report on Proposals A2010 — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 34 _______________________________________________________________ 34-35 Log #CP42 Final Action: Accept (10.6 (New) ) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Add a new Section 10.6 to read: 10.6 Combustible Dusts and Residues. 10.6.1* Equipment that produces combustible dusts, such as paper and starch, and surrounding areas shall be kept as clean as possible by periodic cleaning or by automatic dust collection equipment. A.10.6.1 For manual cleaning, vacuuming is the preferred method. 10.6.2 All process areas shall be kept free of excessive accumulation of deposits of combustible residues. 10.6.3 Combustible coverings (thin paper, plastic) and strippable coatings shall be permitted to be used to facilitate cleaning operations in process areas. 10.6.3.1 When plastic covering is used, it shall be of a static dissipative nature or shall have a maximum breakdown voltage of 4 kV to prevent accumulation of a hazardous static electric charge. 10.6.4 If residue accumulates to excess, all process operations shall be discontinued until conditions have been corrected. Renumber existing sections 10.6, 10.7, and 10.8 accordingly. Substantiation: This new text is added to address a particular hazard that exists with printing processes, namely the production of combustible dusts and fine particulate matter, which is not a hazard in traditional dipping and coating processes. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-36 Log #CP43 Final Action: Accept (10.6) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise existing 10.6, to be renumbered 10.7, to read: Signs stating NO SMOKING OR OPEN FLAMES and meeting the requirements of ANSI Z535, Safety Signs Series IS, shall be conspicuously posted at in all dipping and coating process areas and in flammable and combustible liquids paint storage areas rooms. Substantiation: This requirement applies to all processes within the scope of this standard. Also, the previous text applied only to paints, whereas there might be other flammable/combustible liquids used in these processes that present the same hazard as flammable paints. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 21 Negative: 1 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Negative: ANKELE, D.: The introduction of Section 10.6, and especially 10.6.4 raises the question whether the area where these accumulations occur needs classification as a Class II or perhaps a Class III area (as required) if the accumulation is the result of operation of the equipment. 10.6.4 at minimum must reference NFPA 70, Articles 500.5(C ) and 500.5(D) along with an indication that classification of the area shall be considered. Where ventilation for mitigation of a vapor hazard is present, the risk of dispersion of the dust or flyings into the air is increased and must be considered. 10.6.3.1 should reference NFPA 77, section 3.3.8 regarding conductivity of the plastic sheeting. The clause should read: 10.6.3.1 When plastic covering is used, it shall have the conductivity level required in NFPA 77, Section 3.3.8 to prevent accumulation of ignition capable static electric charge. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-37 Log #1 Final Action: Accept (10.8.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Bob Eugene, Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Recommendation: Revise text as follows: 10.8.2 Equipment. Solvent distillation units shall be approved or shall be listed in accordance with ANSI/UL 2208, Standard for Solvent Distillation Units. Substantiation: Update title of UL 2208 to reflect ANSI approval. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G.
Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-32 Log #CP39 Final Action: Accept (10.2.3.3 (New) ) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Add a new 10.2.3.3 to read: Good housekeeping shall be provided throughout with special attention given to presses, ducts, ink troughs, folders and driers. Particular attention shall be given to assessing the degree of ink mist and dust accumulation in the vicinity of the press. Paper scrap, flammable liquids, and cleaning rags shall not be allowed to accumulate. Substantiation: This provides general housekeeping requirements that specifically address printing processes. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). Comment on Affirmative: EUSON, T.: Editorial comment: It appears that this number is not correct. This should be 10.2.3.1 or 10.2.4. _______________________________________________________________ 34-33 Log #CP40 Final Action: Accept (10.3.1) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: 10.3.1 Approved waste containers shall be provided wherever rags, other absorbent materials, or waste that are impregnated with flammable or combustible liquids material, and all such rags or waste shall be deposited in approved waste containers therein immediately after use. The contents of waste containers shall be placed in a designated storage location. 10.3.1.1 Storage beyond the immediate work shift shall be in closed metal containers. 10.3.1.2 The closed metal containers shall be placed in a designated location. Substantiation: These additions and changes parallel identical changes made to NFPA 33. It is the intent of the Technical Committee on Finishing Processes to keep both documents as close to each other as practical in format and wording to assist the user. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-34 Log #CP41 Final Action: Accept (10.5) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Replace the current text of Section 10.5 with the following: 10.5 Cleaning Operations. 10.5.1 Scope. This section shall apply to the use of flammable or combustible liquids for the flushing and cleaning of equipment. 10.5.2 Liquids. Class I and Class II liquids used in cleaning operations shall be in original shipping containers or in listed safety containers. 10.5.3 Location. Cleaning operations using flammable or combustible liquids shall be conducted with ventilating equipment operating or in ventilated areas that meet the requirements of Chapter 7. Such areas shall also meet the electrical area classification requirements of 6.6. Substantiation: The new text is more specific for the processes covered. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 21 Negative: 1 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Negative: ANKELE, D.: No technical substantiation was provided for the addition of Class I and Class II materials for cleaning operations. The current limitation for the solvents to have a flash point above 100 F or equal to that of the material used in the process permits the area classification and the area ventilation to be adequate for the cleaning solvent. Introduction of low flashpoint solvents without accommodating for the potential for increased vapor accumulations above 25% LEL is a potential hazard. The proposal gives no direction regarding this issue. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2).
34-8
Report on Proposals A2010 — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 34 _______________________________________________________________ 34-42 Log #CP50 Final Action: Accept (A.9.6) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Replace “dipping and coating” with “process”. Substantiation: This information applies to any process tank within the scope of the standard. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-43 Log #CP51 Final Action: Accept (A.10.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise text to read as follows: In the second paragraph, replace “dipping and coating” with “dipping, coating, and printing”. Substantiation: This information applies to any process tank within the scope of the standard. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-44 Log #CP62 Final Action: Accept (A.10.3) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise to read: A.10.3 Many fires have originated from the spontaneous ignition of fabric and waste impregnated with coating materials. After material, workpieces, or equipment dipped or coated articles have been rubbed with rags or after waste has been cleaned up, all rags and waste material should be immediately placed in approved waste containers and removed from the premises at least daily or at the close of each shift. When employees change clothes on plant premises, soiled clothing should be kept in metal lockers provided in a separate dressing room. Many residue scrapings, used filter media, and process room refuse are highly susceptible to spontaneous ignition; hence. They should be taken carried to an approved a safe, well-detached location and properly disposed of daily. Nitrocellulose residues should not be burned in boilers because the gases of decomposition could cause an explosion. Substantiation: These additions and changes parallel identical changes made to NFPA 33. It is the intent of the Technical Committee on Finishing Processes to keep both documents as close to each other as practical in format and wording to assist the user. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G.
_______________________________________________________________ 34-38 Log #CP44 Final Action: Accept (10.10 (New) ) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Add a new Section 10.10 to read: 10.10 Solvent Recovery Systems. Where solvent recovery systems are provided for the process or for exhaust systems, the installation shall be designed and protected in accordance with NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code. Substantiation: Solvent recovery units are regularly used in operations where flammable and combustible liquid coatings are used. This addition parallels similar provisions of NFPA 30 and NFPA 33. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 23 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. _______________________________________________________________ 34-39 Log #CP45 Final Action: Accept (12.1) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise text of 12.1 to read: All personnel involved in dipping, or coating, or printing processes covered by this standard shall be instructed in the safety and health hazards of the processes and the fire protection systems; the operational, maintenance, and emergency procedures required; and the importance of constant operator awareness. Substantiation: These amendments broaden the applicability of these provisions to all processes within the scope of the standard. They also specify that the concern is for process hazards and any hazards that might be presented by the fire protection systems. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-40 Log #CP49 Final Action: Accept (A.9.2) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Revise text as follows: In the second sentence, replace “dipping and coating” with “dipping, coating, and printing”. In the fourth paragraph, delete “coating” Substantiation: See Committee Proposal 34-4 (Log #CP53). Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2). _______________________________________________________________ 34-41 Log #CP34 Final Action: Accept (A.9.3.1(3) (New) ) _______________________________________________________________ Submitter: Technical Committee on Finishing Processes, Recommendation: Add an annex item to read: A.9.3.1(3) Fixed, automatic carbon dioxide systems have historically been provided to protect the following: (1) Flexograph presses and rotogravure presses using Class I and II inks, with nozzles arranged to protect printing heads, ink reservoirs, and other areas likely to contain flammable liquid-based inks. (2) Presses using flammable liquid-based inks having shielded spaces where automatic sprinkler installation is impractical. Consideration should be given to providing a connected reserve for high pressure carbon dioxide systems and sufficient agent for two complete discharge cycles for low pressure carbon dioxide systems. Substantiation: This annex material provides information on the appropriate fire suppression agent for specific types of printing presses. Committee Meeting Action: Accept Number Eligible to Vote: 27 Ballot Results: Affirmative: 22 Abstain: 1 Ballot Not Returned: 4 Jurasic, J., Korecky, M., McKnight, J., Murin, G. Explanation of Abstention: HAYNACK, B.: See my Explanation of Abstention on Proposal 34-2 (Log #CP2).
