3. Ligand Field Theory-II
-
Upload
ghulam-jaffar -
Category
Documents
-
view
82 -
download
2
description
Transcript of 3. Ligand Field Theory-II
![Page 1: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Electronic spectra of transition metal complexes
![Page 2: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Characteristics of electronic spectra
a) Wavelength Energy of electronic transition
b) Shape. Gaussian Band Shape - coupling of electronic and vibrational states
c) Intensity. Molar absorptivity, (M1cm1) due to probability of electronic transitions.
d) Number of bands Transitions between States of given dn configuration.
![Page 3: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Electronic transitions are controlled by quantum mechanical selection rules which determine the probability (intensity) of the transition.
Transition εmax (M1cm1)
Spin and Symmetry forbidden "d-d" bands 0.02 - 1
Spin allowed and Symmetry forbidden "d-d" bands (Oh) 1 - 10 (Td) 10 – 103
Spin and Symmetry allowed LMCT and MLCT bands 103 - 5 x 104
Band intensity in electronic spectra ()
![Page 5: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Spin Selection Rule: There must be no change in the spin multiplicity (2S + 1) during the transition.
i.e. the spin of the electron must not change during the transition.
Symmetry (Laporte) Selection Rule: There must be a change in parity (g ↔ u) during the transition
Since s and d orbitals are g (gerade) and p orbitals are u(ungerade), only s ↔ p and p ↔ d transitions are allowed and d → d transition are formally forbidden. [i.e. only transitions for which Δl = ± 1 are allowed]. d → d bands are allowed to the extent that the starting or terminal level of the transition is not a pure d-orbital. (i.e. it is a molecular orbital of the complex with both metal and ligand character).
![Page 6: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
States for dn configurationsRussel-Saunders Coupling
• Angular momentum of individual electrons couple to give total angular momentum for dn configuration ML = ∑ml
• Spin momentum of individual electron spins couple together to give total spin, S = ∑s
• Inter-electronic repulsions between the electrons in the d orbitals give rise to ground state and excited states for dn configurations.
• States are labeled with Tern Symbols
• Electonic transitions between ground and excited states are summarized in Orgel and Tanabe-Sugano diagrams .
• Term Symbols (labels for states) contain information about L and S for state Hund’s Rules. i) Ground state has maximum spin, S ii) For states of same spin, ground state has maximum L.
![Page 7: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Triple degeneracy of a d2 ion’s 3T2g
ground state due to three possible sites for hole in t2g level
Singly degenerate 3T2g ground state. Only one possible arrangement for three electrons in t2g level
Singly degenerate 3T2g ground state. Only one possible arrangement for six t2g electrons.
Triple degenerate ground state for d7 Three possible sites for hole in t2g level
eg
t2g
Ground State Excited States
eg
t2g
eg
t2g
eg
t2g
d2
d3
d7
d8
Number of d-d bands in electronic spectrumExcitation from ground state to excited stated of dn configuration
![Page 8: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Labeling of d-d bands in electronic spectrum.
• Consider states of dn configuration
• Determine free ion ground state Term Symbol (labels for states)
• Assign splitting of states in ligand field
• Spectroscopic labeling of bands.
• Orgel diagrams (high-spin)• Tanabe-Sugano diagrams (high-spin and low-spin)
![Page 9: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Individual electron l = 2, ml = 2, 1, 0, -1, -2Maximum ml = l
l = 0, 1, 2, 3, Orbital: s, p, d , f _______________________________
dn configuration, L = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 Term Symbol S, P, D, F, G
ML = Σ ml, maximum ML = L
Spin Multiplicity = 2 S +1
![Page 10: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Free ion ground state Term Symbols for dn configurations
Term Symbols (labels for states) contain information about L and S for ground state
Hund’s Rules. i) Ground state has maximum spin, S
ii) For states of same spin, ground state has maximum L
2 1 0 -1 -2ml =l = 2,SL 2S + 1
2 1/2 2
3 1 3
3 3/2 4
2 2 5
0 5/2 6
L = ML(max) ML = ml S = s
Termsymbol
2D
3F
4F
5D
6S
![Page 11: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2 1 0 -1 -2ml =l = 2,SL 2S + 1
2 2 5
3 3/2 4
3 1 3
2 1/2 2
0 0 1
L = ML(max) ML = ml S = s
Termsymbol
5D
4F
3F
2D
1S
d6
d7
d8
d9
d10
![Page 12: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Term Symbol2D3F
4F5D6S
d1
d2
d4d3
d5
d9
d8
d6d7
Free Ion Ground Statedn Splitting of States in Oh ligand field
2D 2T2g + 2Eg
3F4F5D6S
3T1g + 3T2g + 3A2g
4T1g + 4T2g + 4A2g5T2g + 5Eg
6A1g
![Page 13: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Splitting of the weak field dn ground state terms in an octahedral ligand field
Correlation of spectroscopic terms for dn configuration in Oh complexes
AtomicTerm
Numberof states
Terms in OhSymmetry
S 1 A1gP 3 T1gD 5 T2g + EgF 7 T1g + T2g + A2g
Ground state determined by inspection of degeneracy of terms for given dn
![Page 14: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
od1 od2 d3 od4
2T2g
2Eg
2D 4F
3A2g
3T2g
3T1g
4A2go
4T1g
4T2g
5Eg
5T2g
5D3F
4T1g(P)
3P 4P
3T1g(P)
2T2g2Eg 3T1g
3T2g
3T1g
3T1g
3A2g
3T1g(P)
Orgel Diagrams
Ti3+ V2+ Cr3+ Mn3+
![Page 16: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The d-d bands of the d2 ion [V(H2O)6]3+
![Page 17: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
(a) [Ni(H20)6]2+ (b) [Ni(NH3)6]2+
![Page 18: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
3F
3P
1S
1D
d2
E(3F) = A - 8B
E(1D) = A - 3B + 2C
E(3P) = A+7B
Racah Inter-electronic Repulsion Parameters (B, C)
3F 3P3F 1D
= 15B
= 5B + 2C
1G
![Page 19: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The Tanabe-Sugano diagram for the d2 ion
![Page 20: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Evidence for covalent bonding in metal-ligand interactionsThe Nephelauxetic Effect (“cloud expansion”)
Reduction in electron-electron repulsion upon complex formation
Racah Parameter, B: electron-elctronic repulsion parameter
Bo is the inter- electronic repulsion in the gaseous Mn+ ion.B is the inter- electronic repulsion in the complexed MLx
n+ ion.
The smaller values for B in the complex compared to free gaseous ion is taken as evidence of smaller inter-electronic repulsion in the complex due to a larger “molecular orbital” on account of overlap
of ligand and metal orbital, i.e. evidence of covalency (cloud expansion”).
Nephelauxetic Ratio, β = B Bo
![Page 21: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Nephelauxetic Effect
Nephelauxetic Ligand Series
I < Br < CN < Cl < NCS < C2O42- < en < NH3 < H2O < F
Small β Large β Covalent Ionic
Nephelauxetic Metal Series
Pt4+ < Co3+ < Rh3+~Ir3+ < Fe3+ < Cr3+ < Ni2+ < V4+< Pt2+~ Mn2+ Small β Large β Large overlap Small overlap
Covalent Ionic
![Page 22: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Empirical Racah parameters, h, kβ = 1– [h(ligand) x k(metal)]
Cr(NH3)63+ β = 1 –hk
β = 1 –(1.4)(0.21) = 0.706
Cr(CN)63- β = 1 –hk
β = 1 –(2.0)(0.21) = 0.580
Bo - B = hligands x kmetal ion
Bo
![Page 23: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Typical Δo and λmax values for octahedral (ML6) d-block metal complexes__________________________________________________________________Complex Δo cm-1 ~ λmax (nm) Complex Δo cm-1 λmax (nm)___________________________________________________________________________________[Ti(H2O)6]3+ 20,300 493 [Fe(H2O)6]2+ 9,400 1064[V(H2O)6]3+ 20,300 493 [Fe(H2O)6]3+ 13,700 730[V(H2O)6]2+ 12,400 806 [Fe(CN)6]3- 35,000 286[CrF6]3- 15,000 667 [Fe(CN)6]4- 33,800 296[Co(H2O)6]3+, l.s. 20,700 483 [Fe(C2O4)3]3- 14,100 709[Cr(H2O)6]2+ 14,100 709 [Co(CN)6]3- l.s. 34,800 287[Cr(H2O)6]3+ 17,400 575 [Co(NH3)6]3+ l.s. 22,900 437[Cr(NH3)6]3+ 21,600 463 [Ni(H2O)6]2+ 8,500 1176[Cr(en)3]3+ 21,900 457 [Ni(NH3)6]2+ 10,800 926[Cr(CN)6]3- 26,600 376 [Ni(en)3]2+ 11,500 870___________________________________________________________________________________
![Page 25: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061500/577cc67b1a28aba7119e59fd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
1. Assign the metal oxidation state in the following compounds.
a. K2[PtCl6]b. Na2[Fe(CO)4]c. [Mn(CH3)(CO)5]
2. Account for the following:
The manganous ion, [Mn(H2O)6]2+, reacts with CN- to form [Mn(CN)6]4- which has
= 1.95 B.M., but with I- to give [MnI4]2- which has = 5.93 B. M.
[Co(NH3)6]Cl3 is diamagnetic, whereas Na3[CoF6] is paramagnetic ( = 5.02 B.M).
[PtBr2Cl2]2 is diamagnetic and exists in two isomeric forms, whereas [NiBr2Cl2]2
has a magnetic moment, = 3.95 B.M., and does not exhibit isomerism.
Copper(II) complexes are typically blue with one visible absorption band in their
electronic spectra whereas copper(I) complexes are generally colorless. Assign a spectroscopic label to the Cu2+ transition.