3. Emission-based traffic responsive signal control … of Massachusetts Transportation Center 1 3....

14
1 University of Massachusetts Transportation Center 3. Emission-based traffic responsive signal control system Khalighi, F., and Christofa, E. 2015. Emission-based Signal Timing Optimization for Isolated Intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2487:1- 14, doi:10.3141/2487-01. Khalighi, F., 2015. A Real-time Signal Control System to Minimize Emissions at Isolated Intersections, MSc. Thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Transcript of 3. Emission-based traffic responsive signal control … of Massachusetts Transportation Center 1 3....

  • 1University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    3. Emission-based traffic responsive signal control system

    Khalighi, F., and Christofa, E. 2015. Emission-based Signal Timing Optimization for Isolated Intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2487:1-14, doi:10.3141/2487-01.Khalighi, F., 2015. A Real-time Signal Control System to Minimize Emissions at Isolated Intersections, MSc. Thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

  • 2University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    Research Objectives

    Given the lack of a real-time signal control system that minimizes total emissions of cars and buses by utilizing modal-based emission estimation:

    Develop an analytical model to estimate emissions using macroscopic traffic stream characteristics and modal emission estimation

    Design a traffic responsive signal control system that minimizes total emissions of cars and buses at isolated intersections.

  • 3University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    Assumptions

    Impact of bus stops on auto and transit operations are ignored

    Transit vehicles travel in mixed lanes along with autos

    Vehicles arrive at a constant rate

    Analytical models developed:

    to infer trajectories given certain macroscopic characteristics such as arrival rate and saturation flow

    assuming that auto and transit vehicle arrival times are known in real-time

  • 4University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    ITS Technologies for real-world implementation

    Sensing Systems (detectors) Vehicle arrival rates Travel times

    Automated Vehicle Location (AVL)Systems Bus dwell times at stopstravel

    timesarrival times

    Source:http://www.precisiontrafficsafety.com/products/sensys/

    Source: www.tc.umn.edu

  • 5University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    subject to:

    (Minimum green for each phase and lane group)

    (Constant cycle length)

    Min

    Mathematical Program

    Total Emissions of Cars and Buses

  • 6University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    Methodology

  • 7University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    Methodology

    d1,T

  • 8University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    VSP (Vehicle Specific Power)value

    VSPmode

    emissionrate

    Speed Acceleration Links grade

    Assumptions:o Links grade = 0o Constant cruising speed = 45 (km/hr)o Constant acceleration/deceleration rates

    - Cars: acceleration rate = 3 (ms2

    ) and deceleration rate = 4 (ms2

    )- Buses: acceleration rate = 2 (m

    s2) and deceleration rate = 2 (m

    s2)

    Modal Emission Rate Estimation

  • 9University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    Emission Rates

    Vehicle Type

    Operating Mode

    HC

    Gasoline Autos

    Acceleration

    7.7

    2.5

    Deceleration

    0.9

    0.5

    Cruising

    1.2

    0.4

    Idling

    0.3

    0.4

    Diesel Buses

    Acceleration

    263.5

    2.1

    Deceleration

    45.0

    1.3

    Cruising

    133.3

    1.7

    Idling

    45.0

    1.3

  • 10University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    Test Site: Mesogeion & Katechaki Avenues, Athens, Greece

  • 11University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    -20%

    -15%

    -10%

    -5%

    0%

    5%

    0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

    % C

    hang

    e in

    Em

    issi

    on (H

    C) f

    rom

    Ve

    hicl

    e-ba

    sed

    to E

    mis

    sion

    -bas

    ed

    Opt

    imiz

    atio

    n

    Intersection Flow Ratio (Y)

    Auto Bus Total

    Results: Comparison with Vehicle-based optimizationEffect of Auto Demand

    Auto demand increases

  • 12University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    Findings

    Reduction in overall emissions and transit emissions

    The lower the auto demand, the higher the overall reduction in emissions

    Results depend on the vehicle technology and emission factors

  • 13University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    Current and Future Work

    Real-time signal control system with TSP that accounts for stochasticity in transit vehicle arrivals

    Real-time signal control system to minimize person delay and emissions

    Prediction algorithms for vehicle arrivals using low resolution AVL data

    Extension of real-time signal control systems to networks

  • 14University of Massachusetts Transportation Center

    Thank you

    Yashar Zeinali Farid ([email protected])

    Farnoush Khalighi ([email protected])

    Eleni Christofa ([email protected])

    3. Emission-based traffic responsive signal control systemResearch ObjectivesAssumptionsITS Technologies for real-world implementationMathematical ProgramMethodologyMethodologyModal Emission Rate EstimationEmission RatesTest Site: Mesogeion & Katechaki Avenues, Athens, GreeceResults: Comparison with Vehicle-based optimizationFindings Current and Future WorkSlide Number 14