3 bolivia - PAHO/WHO · 2011. 3. 16. · 3 bolivia Overview of the situation Figures 1-5 in...
Transcript of 3 bolivia - PAHO/WHO · 2011. 3. 16. · 3 bolivia Overview of the situation Figures 1-5 in...
bolivia3
Overview of the situationFigures 1-5
in Bolivia, malaria is endemic in two main areas - in the north and in the south of the country. Malaria transmission is most intense in the Amazon Departments of Beni and Pando, which border Brazil and Peru. Plasmodium falciparum-borne malaria is highly focal in this region of the country, where transmission peaks are associa-ted with the harvesting activities in which a large part of the population is engaged. The perpetua-tion of malaria transmission can be traced to the difficulties in timely access to health services and poor living conditions of the population groups that move around to harvest Brazil nuts in those regions.
in 2008, 9,748 cases of malaria were repor-ted in Bolivia, of which 836 were P. falciparum -borne, making it the country with the smallest percentage of transmission by P. falciparum in the Amazon region. The Department of Beni re-ported 5,826 cases (59%), most of them in people involved in carrying out harvesting activities in the adjacent Department of Pando. As in the rest of the Amazon region of the neighboring coun-tries, Anopheles darlingi is the principal species of malaria vector. As part of the vector control activities, entomological studies were recently conducted in areas of high malaria transmission in the Departments of Beni and Pando; mosqui-
to biting rates were found between 1.2 and 242 bites per night inside dwellings. The Municipali-ty of Guayaramerin, adjacent to the border with the Brazilian State of Rondonia, has the second highest number of cases and is an important ur-ban malaria transmission area.
in southern Bolivia, on the border with Ar-gentina and Paraguay, malaria is concentrated in a few pockets in the Department of tarija, where Plasmodium vivax-borne malaria predomina-tes. in this region, Yacuiba reported 858 cases in 2008, making it the country’s third-highest municipality in malaria incidence. in localities of this region with less intensive malaria trans-mission, Anopheles pseudopunctipenis is the res-ponsible vector species. Morbidity and mortality trends Figures 4 – 9
Malaria transmission in Bolivia has dropped considerably over the past 10 years. P. vivax-borne malaria was 30.6% lower in 2008 than the previous year, while the drop in P. falciparum transmission is almost 50% in the same period. The 9,748 cases reported in 2008 constitute the lowest figure since the 1998 epidemic, when 74,350 cases were reported. There have been no reported deaths from malaria in the country sin-ce 2003.
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 87 0
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8 B O l i V iA 7 1
Geographical distributionFigures 1, 12 – 19
The Municipality of Riberalta, in the De-partment of Beni, with 3,620 cases reported in 2008, accounts for 38.4% of the country’s total malaria cases. This municipality along with the municipality of Guayaramerin accounted for 60% of Bolivia’s malaria morbidity. This shows a high concentration of malaria cases in this re-gion, which could offer a good opportunity for control efforts. While malaria transmission was found to exist in 66 municipalities in 2008, 19 of these reported less than 5 cases each, while 17 had more than 50. Only 13 municipalities reported 1 or more cases of P.falciparum-borne malaria and only 3 reported more than 10 cases transmitted by this parasite species during the period. Bolivia’s malaria situation is better than that of its neighbors. Given its highly focal trans-mission, high impact operations can be expected to be successful in the short term. in 2006, the malaria program, which had pre-viously used the total populations of malaria-endemic municipalities, adjusted the population at risk. even so, Annual Parasite incidence (APi) dropped, particularly in the high-risk municipa-lities. furthermore, the number of malaria-en-demic municipalities gradually decreased, from 150 in 2005 to 66 in 2008.
Malaria in priority groups Figures 25 – 28
in 2008, 9.4% of the malaria cases reported in Bolivia were among children under the age of 5.
Malaria transmission in urban areas, na-mely the municipality of Guayaramerin, in the Department of Pando, accounted for 11% of the total cases.
Although the malaria information system does not record the ethnic origin of the cases, because of Bolivia’s demographic characteristics, most of these are considered indigenous. This is especially obvious among the Brazil nut harves-ters in the Departments of Beni and Pando, whe-re over 60% of the cases are reported.
The individual reporting-based information system under implementation since 2007 made it possible to determine that in 2008, 6.3% of the cases of malaria among women of childbearing age in the Departments of Beni and Pando were in pregnant women. inasmuch as the general fertility rate in Bolivia is close to 110 per 1,000 (11%), the reported percentage of pregnant wo-men with malaria could mean that a sizeable number of such women with malaria are not be-ing reported as being pregnant and are possibly not receiving the special care they need. Diagnosis and treatment Figures 20 – 24, 29 – 30
in 2008, the malaria program conducted 159,826 slides were examined in suspected cases with access to the health system. The SPR was 6.1%, lowest since 2000. Although the SPR in the Department of Beni, where most of the malaria cases are concentrated, was higher than that of other departments, it was lower than that repor-ted in areas with higher levels of malaria trans-mission in other countries of the region, like Brazil and colombia.
in 2008, 48% of the malaria cases were diag-nosed within the first 72 hours after the onset of symptoms. late initiation of treatment in a lar-ge number of cases is apparently a determining factor in continued malaria transmission in the most endemic areas.
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8B O l i V iA7 2
in 2005, Bolivia started to use RDts for malaria diagnosis and in 2008, 5,000 tests were used, amounting to 3% of all suspected cases examined.
timely access to parasitological diagnostic test for malaria is impossible in difficult-to-reach scattered areas. Although no objective informa-tion exists about cases of fever among people who have no contact with the health system, their existence can be assumed in several mala-ria endemic areas, particularly in the Amazon region.
Bolivia was the second country in the re-gion to introduce the use of Acts for mala-ria treatment. The country has been using the ASu+MQ combination since 2001 as a first-line therapy for uncomplicated P. falciparum mala-ria. The introduction of Act treatment in 2001 coincided with a marked decline in the number and percentage of P. falciparum malaria cases. However, despite the continued use of Acts, the proportion of P. falciparum malaria rose between 2005 and 2007, dropping once again in 2008. Prevention and vector control Figures 31-33
While iRS continues to be one of the vector con-trol strategies in Bolivia, its use declined simul-taneously with the drop in the number of ma-laria cases between 2005 and 2008. The number of people protected by iRS in 2008 was almost 6 times smaller than in 2005; it should be noted, however, that over the past three years, a total of approximately 60,000 persons have been protec-ted by llins, close in number to the total people protected by iRS in 2005, when malaria episodes in the country surpassed 20,000.
The widest coverage through the use of llins introduced in Bolivia in 2005, was reached in 2006, during the implementation of the pro-ject financed by the Global fund. in 2007, with support from the uSAiD-funded AMi initiati-ve, the llin implementation strategy was laun-ched in selected localities, with the adoption of a package of operating requirements focused on achieving good usage coverage in the localities benefited and appropriate handling to safeguard duration. in 2008, 5,000 llins were distributed. Financing of malaria control Figure 34
Between 2004 and 2006, Bolivia benefited from a malaria control project financed by the Global fund. The financing was suspended in 2007 and a second project submitted during the 8th con-vocation of the GfAtM was approved in 2008.
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8 B O l i V iA 7 3
Bolivia
Brazil
ChileParaguay
Peru
Argentina 3
Figure 1. Number of cases by ADM 2 level (municipality, district), 2008
P. vivax
1 - 73
74 - 216
217 - 315
316 - 1170
1171 - 4890
No cases
Legend
P. falciparum
1 Dot = 10 cases
9%
91%
Plasmodium species
P. vivax
Figure 2. Proportion of cases by species, 2008
P. falciparum and mixed
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8B O l i V iA7 4
ADM1 Total casesP. vivaxP. falciparum + mixed
Figure 3. Number of malaria cases by species by ADM1 level in 2008
ADM1
2,0000 0% 50% 100%Total number of cases Percentage of total cases
4,000 6,000
Beni
Tarija
Santa Cruz
Pando
Cochabamba
La paz
Potosi
Chuquisaca 132
156
247
250
800
913
1,424
5,826
132
156
234
247
730
889
1,424
5,100
0
0
13
3
70
24
0
726 Beni
Tarija
Santa Cruz
Pando
Cochabamba
La paz
Potosi
Chuquisaca
Plasmodium species
P. falciparum and mixed P. vivax
Figure 4. Number of cases by species, 2000 - 2008
Plasmodium species
P. falciparum and mixed P. vivax
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
0
10,000
20,000
30,000 28,932
14,957
13,549
17,319
14,215
19,062
17,210
12,988
8,912
2,446808 727 793 695 1,080 1,785 1,610 836
Figure 5. Number of malaria cases, 2000 - 2008
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
0
20,000
10,000
Num
ber o
f cas
es
31,4
69
15,7
65
14,2
76
20,3
43
14,9
10 18,9
95
14,6
10
9,74
8
20,1
42
30,000
40,000
00000
2
444
Num
ber o
f dea
ths
Figure 6. Number of malaria deaths, 2000-2008
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
0
4
3
2
1
00NANA 0
82
44
6
285
Num
ber o
f cas
es
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
0
300
200
100
Figure 7. Number of hospitalized malaria cases, 2000 - 2008
NA - No Data Available
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8 B O l i V iA 7 5
Year
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
-5,000
-10,000
0
500
Plasmodium species
P. falciparum and mixed P. vivax
-4,076-4,222
-1,852
4,847
-3,104
3,770
-1,408
-13,975
-774-175
705385
-98
66-81
-1,638
Diff
eren
ce in
num
ber
of c
ases
Figure 8. Annual variations in number of cases
Year
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
-20%
-40%
Per
cent
age
diff
eren
ce
Figure 9. Percentage differencein number of cases compared to 2000
-60%
-80%
0%
-69%
-55%
-41%
-34%
-51%-40%
-53%
0%
-66%
-34%
-27%
-56%
-72%-68%-70%
-67%
-48%
Plasmodium species
P. falciparum and mixed P. vivax
Num
ber
of c
ases
Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
10,000
20,000
30,000
Figure 10. Number of cases and RBM / MDG targets for 2010 and 2015
Reported cases RBM / MDG Targets
Figure 11. Percentage of hospitalized cases, 2008
0%
100%
Percentage of cases
Oupatients
Hospitalized
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8B O l i V iA7 6
Figure 12. Districts (ADM2) with highest malaria burden and cummulative proportion of total cases in the country, 2008
Number of cases Cummulative proportion (%) of total cases
* See Annex A for a complete list.
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Riberalta
Guayaramerin
Yacuiba
San Ignacio de Velasco
Bermejo
El Torno
Villa Tunari
Buena Vista
San Lorenzo (Exaltación)
Bolivar (Sena)
Baures
Carapari
Nueva Esperanza (Nuevo M.)
Toro Toro
Villamontes
Victoria (Puerto Rico)
Ayata 53
70
79
85
102
106
116
139
156
186
215
306
312
327
858
1,994
3,620
93%
92%
91%
90%
90%
88%
87%
86%
85%
83%
81%
79%
75%
72%
69%
60%
38%
Figure 13. Districts (ADM2) by numberof malaria cases, 2008
Number of districts
Number of cases>1,001
501-1,000
251-500
101-250
51-100
11-50
6-10
1-5
Grand Total
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
19
7
23
4
7
3
1
2
��
Figure 14. Districts (ADM2) by number ofP. falciparum cases, 2008
Number of districts
101-250
251-500
11-50
6-10
1-5
Grand Total
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
7
3
1
1
1
13
Number ofP. falciparum
cases
Figure 15. Districts (ADM2) by number of cases, API and percentage of P. falciparum cases, 2008
Per
cent
age
of P
. fal
cip
arum
cas
es
Number of cases (logarithmic scale)
API0.05
20406080
105.15
2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1,000 2,000 5,000
0
5
10
15
20
25
Zudanez Yacuiba
Villa Nueva (Loma Alta)
Santos Mercado (Eureka)
Santa Rosa del Abuna (Nacebe)
Riberalta
Ixiamas
Guayaramerin
Bolivar (Sena)
Bella Flor (Costa Rica)
BauresAyataAcasio
250
25
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8 B O l i V iA 7 7
Figure 16. Annual Parasite Index (API) by districts (ADM2), 2008
Legend
0.01 - 1.00
1.01 - 5.00
Municipal API
5.01 - 10.00
10.01 - 50.00
50.01 - 100.00
100.01 - 500.00
Bolivia
Brazil
ChileParaguay
Peru
Argentina
Figure 17. Population by malariatransmission risk, 2008
High risk (API > 10/1000)
Medium risk (1/1000 < API < 10/1000)
Low risk (API < 1/1000 )
Malaria free areas (No indigenous transmission)
7%5%2%
86%
Population
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8B O l i V iA7 8
Nueva Esperanza (Nuevo)
Bolivar (Sena)
Guayaramerin
Ayata
Riberalta
San Lorenzo (Exaltacion)
Santos Mercado (Eureka)
Villa Nueva (Loma Alta)
Ravelo (Moro Moro)
Gral. Juan Jose Perez
Baures
Victoria (Puerto Rico)
Toro Toro
Ingavi (Humaita)
Buena Vista
Villa Serrano
Carapari
Bella Flor (Costa Rica)
Acasio
Santa Rosa del Abuna
Bermejo
San Ignacio de Velasco
Yacuiba
Azurduy
El Torno
Teoponte
Agua Dulce (Pto. G. More)
Zudanez
Ixiamas
Porvenir (Campo Ana)
Villa Tunari
Padcaya
Padilla 21
24
215
23
45
4
29
26
306
37
858
327
312
23
7
23
106
16
186
12
85
70
116
23
36
35
28
156
3,620
53
1,994
139
102
3.35
3.69
4.38
5.36
5.81
6.02
6.15
6.19
6.36
6.69
6.82
6.99
8.03
8.97
9.03
10
10.61
10.7
12.82
13.19
14.04
15.35
22.02
27.06
28.57
29.89
36.32
38.83
41.01
42.67
44.33
55.87
105.15
Figure 18. Annual Parasite Index (API) and numberof cases by district*, 2008
0 2,000 4,000Number of cases
0 50 100 150API
* See Annex A for a complete list
API (cases/ 1000 people at risk)
0 105.15
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008 8,644,057
8,268,107
8,198,269
5,749,219
5,856,511
5,712,922
5,486,743
6,753,268
4,857,790
678,535
849,532
720,000
2,887,000
2,482,000
1,544,000
2,377,000
100,000
0
516,248
438,495
438,000
423,000
461,000
339,000
666,000
1,434,000
2,828,000
188,804
271,388
271,000
368,000
427,000
1,429,000
294,000
337,000
742,000
Figure 19. Population by malaria transmission risk, 2000-08
Year Malaria freeareas (Noindigenoustransmission)
Low risk(API < 1/1000)
Medium risk(1/1000 < API< 10/1000)
High risk(API >10/1000)
Year Number of slidesexamined
Number of slidespositive
Slide PositivityRate (%)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008 6.1
8.05
9.11
9.97
9.13
12.85
10.38
12.82
21.85
9,748
14,610
18,995
20,142
14,910
20,343
14,276
15,765
31,469
159,826
180,316
208,616
202,021
163,307
158,299
137,509
122,933
143,990
Figure 20. Slides examined and Slide Positivity Rate (SPR),2000-2008
100,000 200,000 100,000 200,000
Year
Diagnostic Method
Microscopy RDTs
0
Number of cases
0
Number of cases
200020012002200320042005200620072008 159,826 5,000
180,316208,616202,021
6,0006,000
163,307158,299
137,509122,933
143,990
Figure 21. Cases diagnosed by microscopyand RDTs, 2000-08
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8 B O l i V iA 7 9
Figure 22. Number of cases diagnosedand cases treated, 2000-2008
Year2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Diagnosed casesCases treatedDiagnosed casesCases treated
Diagnosed casesCases treated
Diagnosed cases
Cases treatedDiagnosed cases
Cases treated
Diagnosed casesCases treated
Diagnosed casesCases treated
Diagnosed cases
Cases treatedDiagnosed cases
Cases treatedDiagnosed cases
Cases treated
0 10,000 20,000 30,000
Number of cases diagnosed/treated
ADM1 Examined Total cases SPR (%)
Beni
Tarija
Santa Cruz 3.52
3.91
8.87
913
1,424
5,826
Pando
Cochabamba
La paz 5.99
14.46
4.35
247
250
800
Potosi
Chuquisaca
Oruro 0
2.36
7.81
0
132
156
25,914
36,375
65,694
4,121
1,729
18,393
---
5,602
1,998
Figure 23. Slide Positivity Rate (SPR) by ADM1, 2008
--- Data not available
52%
48%
Time span between onset of symptoms and diagnosis
>72 hours
<72 hours
Figure 24. Time span between onset of symptomsand diagnosis, 2008
Figure 25. Number and percentageof cases by age group, 2008
Number of cases
<55-1415-49>50 9.3%
54.9%26.4%
9.4%
2,0000 4,000
Figure 26. Number and percentageof cases by locality type, 2008
Number of cases
UrbanRural
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
89.0%11.0%
Figure 27. Number and percentage of cases in pregnantwomen among women of child bearing age, 2008
Number of cases
PregnantNot pregnant
0 500 1000 1500
93.7%6.3%
Figure 28. Number and percentage of casesin indigenous population, 2008
No Data Available
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
7.8 5.1 5.1 3.9 4.7 5.49.4 11.1 8.6P
erce
ntag
e of
P. f
alci
par
um c
ases
100
0
20
40
60
80
Figure 29. Proportion of P. falciparum cases, 2000-2008
R e P O R t O n t H e S i t uAt i O n O f M A l A R iA i n t H e A M e R i c A S , 2 0 0 8B O l i V iA8 0
Figure 34. Sources for malaria control funds by year, 2000-08
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
US
$
0
1M
2M
Financing sources
USAID
UN agencies
Other bilateral funds
Global Fund
Government
NA - Data not available
Figure 30. Number of ACT treatmentsdistributed by year, 2000-08
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Num
ber
of A
CT
trea
tmen
ts
0
1,000
2,000
782
1,6221,785
1,080
700793727808
Year
Figure 31. Indoor residual sprayingcoverage by year, 2000-08
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Num
ber
of p
eop
le p
rote
cted
0
712,
540
512,
288
97,0
28
8,60
0
8,60
0 69,4
00
26,2
96
19,1
30
8,97
5200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
Year
Figure 33. Number of ITNs distributed by year, 2000-08
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
6,000 6,000
2007 2008
Year
Num
ber
of b
edne
ts
0
4,000
2,000
6,000
Figure 32. Number of LLINs distributed by year, 2000 - 2008
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
16,400
40,000
2007 2008
Year
Num
ber
of b
edne
ts
0
14,000
5,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
40,000