2L. Consideration of approving a letter of support of ...
Transcript of 2L. Consideration of approving a letter of support of ...
City Council Agenda: 10/11/2021
2L. Consideration of approving a letter of support of Wright County’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant application administered by MNDOT.
Prepared by:
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Meeting Date:
10/11/2021
☐ Regular Agenda Item
☒ Consent Agenda Item
Reviewed by:
Community Development Director
Approved by:
City Administrator
ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to approve a letter of support signed by the mayor for Wright County’s Highway Safety Improvement Program grant application.
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) has a Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) that provides federal funding encouraging widespread deployment of safety measures. The current grant solicitation has $13 million available statewide with a maximum award of $500,000 per agency. Projects are selected based on the following criteria:
• Is the project identified in a safety plan focusing on fatal and serious crashes? • Is the project a low-cost solution? • Does the project cover a large area? • Does the project promote partnership between agencies? • Does the project align with the HSIP program goals?
Wright County is proposing to request $436,950 in federal funding to upgrade nine signalized intersections that are within the cities of Monticello, Albertville, St. Michael, and Otsego. These intersections would be upgraded with some of the following upgrades varying by intersection:
• Confirmation lights to allow for the police departments to enforce red light compliance. • Update signal heads with retro-reflective backplates. • Update Signals to meet ADA requirements. • Update pedestrian signals to include countdown timers.
The intersections that would be included in this application for Monticello are as follows:
• Broadway/Fenning • Broadway/Hart Boulevard – Hospital • Broadway/Highland Way
City Council Agenda: 10/11/2021
I. Budget Impact: The matching funds for the project would be 100% funded by
Wright County.
II. Staff Workload Impact: Staff workload would be minimal.
III. Comprehensive Plan Impact: Providing for a safe community is incorporated inn the Monticello 2040 Vision Statement, as a principal Value Statement in the vision. Further, the Monticello’s 2040 Plan’s Implementation chapter cites continued cooperation with local partners like Wright County on road improvements which furthers the mutual goals of the City and County (page 186).
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approving a letter in support signed by the mayor for Wright County’s HSIP grant application.
SUPPORTING DATA
A. Draft Grant Application B. Letter of Support
Due Nov. 24, 2021
Application for Local HSIP Page 1 of 3
Greater Minnesota, Local HSIP Solicitation
Application for Federal Safety Funds 1. Contact Information Detai ls
Lead Agency Contact Name
Wright County Sara Buermann, Traffic Engineer
2. Funding Detai ls
Federal Funds + Local Match = Total Cost
$436,950.00 + $48,550.00 = $485,500
NOTE: maximum of $500,000 in federal funds per agency per project.
Preferred Funding Year(s)
Flexible
Funding Notes
None.
3. Project Description
Project Description
The proposed project upgrades nine urban intersections with varies systemic vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle safety strategies as recommended by the Wright County Road Safety Plan Phase 2.
ATP County or Counties Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
3 Wright Twin Cities Metropolitan Council
NOTE: if any portion of the project is located within MPO boundaries, a letter of support / priority from the MPO is needed.
Estimated Output Units
0.0 Miles
9 Intersections
0 Curves
NOTE: estimate output for one of three metric: number of miles, number of intersections, or number of curves.
4. Selection Criteria
Describe how project was identified.
Projects identified in County Road Safety Plan as high risk and priority location projects, see attached project sheets.
Is this project in partnership with another agency?
No
5. Crash Data for Reactive Projects ONLY: Jan. 1, 2016 through Dec. 31, 2020
Number of Crashes K A B C PDO Total
All Crash Types 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTE: set filters to 2016 through 2020 in MnCMAT if you submit an Intersection Report or Section Report.
OPTIONAL: Crashes by Basic Type K A B C PDO Total
Pedestrian 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bicyclist 0 0 0 0 0 0
Single Vehicle Run‐off‐road 0 0 0 0 0 0
Single Vehicle Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sideswipe Same Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sideswipe Opposing Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rear End 0 0 0 0 0 0
Head On 0 0 0 0 0 0
Left Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Angle 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
OPTIONAL: Description of any unique characteristics.
None.
Reactive projects must have a benefit‐cost ratio greater than 1.00; to simplify this analysis, OTE will conduct the calculation. An electronic copy of the analysis output will be available upon request.
6. OPTIONAL: Additional Notes
Additional Notes for Selection Committee
See attached intersection specific project cost estimate. The urban intersections were identified through the County Road Safety Plan and identify varies safety strategies at each intersection. Each intersection is unique and some of the proposed improvements trigger additional ADA improvements such as compliant landings and ramps as required by Wright County’s ADA transition plan. The County Road Safety Plan identified confirmation lights as a safety strategy at four intersections. A collaborative effort between Highway and Law Enforcement staff identified five additional intersections to nominate for confirmation lights to create a consistent corridor for enforcement.
7. Submission Information
Submit this application via PDF to [email protected] by November 24, 2021. Please include the following as necessary:
Map of project location(s)
County Road Safety Plan project sheet(s)
Letters of support a. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) if within borders b. MnDOT District Traffic Engineer if work performed in MnDOT right‐of‐way
G¦WX
?¾A@ !"b$
GrWXGsWX
?²A@
?ûA@
Pulaski
Pelican
Beebe
GsWX
QR117
QR117
G«WX
G©WX
G±WX
QR119QR113
QR120
G̈WXGvWX
QR131
Buffalo
Hanover
SaintMichael
Otsego
Monticello
Albertville
G§WX
GrWX94
37
25
10TH
101
95TH
39
30TH
JASON
70TH
ED
MO
NS
ON
85TH
20TH
50TH
IFF
ER
T
90TH
LAB
EA
UX
55TH
45TH
KA
DLE
R
42ND
80TH
RIVER
O D
EA
N
35TH
15TH
72ND
CHELSEA
MA
IN
CA
NT
ER
BU
RY
53RD
PA
GE
8TH
SCHOOL
5TH
HA
ML
IN
PA
RR
ISH
EIS
EL
E
83RD
134
55
4TH
IBA
RR
A
CA
LDE
R
NA
SH
UA
MA
CIV
ER
LAN
DE
R
CA
HIL
L
GA
RR
ISO
N
60TH
CE
NTR
AL
BROADWAY
FRANKFORT
65TH
40TH
QU
EE
NS
MA
SO
N
CAMERON
HA
RD
ING
JAM
ISO
N
MC
AL
LIS
TE
R
77TH
FEN
NIN
G
43RD
49TH
PIN
E
DA
GU
E
LEO
QU
AM
67TH
56TH
BR
IAR
WO
OD
JAB
ER
ASH
PA
RK
91ST
CE
DA
R
DA
VE
RN
9TH
DA
VID
SO
N
DIVISION
QU
AD
AY
JAL
GE
R
75TH
PA
CK
AR
D
41ST
16TH
OG
RE
N
17TH
JAN
DE
L
96TH
BEEBE LAKE
WH
ITE
TAIL
PARNELL
OH
LA
ND
KA
HL
101ST
78TH
84TH O B
RIA
N
88TH
87TH
119
HAR
T
NA
BE
R
ELM
3RD
HA
LSE
Y
25TH
IBISBIRCH
HA
UG
RIVERVIEW
1ST
HA
LL
63RD
KAYLA
JAN
ET
T
58TH
82ND
52ND
MA
RV
IN
DUNDAS
47TH
ED
GE
WO
OD
FAL
LON
PA
RE
LL
81ST
PAR
K P
LAC
E
61ST
71ST
FAR
MS
TE
AD
BRADSHAW
12TH
OC
HO
A RA
WLI
NG
S
KA
DY
102ND
FRONTAGE
CARISSA 32ND
PULASKI
STARLING
JANSEN
WILLOW
KA
SS
EL
LIN
CO
LN
69TH
92N
D
74TH
21S
T
HA
NS
AC
K
JAMES
89TH
IRIS
KA
HLE
R
59TH
62ND
KAGAN
NE
ED
HA
M
BAKKEN
WA
JAC
KS
ON
DEER
ELK
105T
DA
RR
OW
DA
LE
36TH
RA
MS
LAM
BE
RT
13T
H
73RD
64TH
OA
KW
OO
D
11TH
QU
ALE
MA
RL
OW
E
OA
KR
IDG
E
79TH
MALLARD
94TH
LAC
HM
AN
DE
EG
AN
KA
LLA
ND
MA
YE
R
KA
LEN
DA
ME
LB
Y
KALI
BR
YA
NT
103RD
97TH
JAN
A
EA
KE
N
RA
ND
OLP
H
LAN
GE
MA
YE
LIN
68TH
TOWN CENTER
O DAY
34TH
CO
UN
TR
Y
54TH
57TH
SAVANNAH
OAK
KA
MA
26TH
NE
LMA
RK
99TH
93RD
FO
X
IDE
CA
RLI
NG
PAD
GE
TT
NA
DA
LA
MA
YF
IELD
QU
ILLEY
QUAKER
MA
RX
LINW
OO
D
IRV
INE
GILLARD
AS
PE
N
31ST
2ND
DA
LTO
N
66TH
PR
ES
CO
TT
FALCON
NA
PIE
R
44TH
GILB
ER
T
BATESG
AB
LER
PE
LICA
N
GO
OD
RIC
H
LAM
ON
T
IN
ES
OTA
W
LAN
NO
N
PR
IVA
TE
CHURCH
HEIGHTS
MEADOW OAK
KA
ED
ING
KA
ISE
R
KESTREL
REDFORD
FAIR
HILL
76TH
NA
SO
N
MA
RS
HA
LL
46TH
KA
ITLIN
BLU
EB
ILL
CE
NT
EN
NIA
L
OG
DE
N
DOVE
LAS
ALL
E
MA
CLY
NN
VALLEY
10TH ST
LAKETOWNE
CH
AM
BE
RLA
IN
NA
UG
HT
OR
PA
LM
GR
EN
18TH
RIVER MILL
MACKENZIE
PA
RS
ON
KA
HLE
N
RIDGE
KIT
TR
ED
GE
6TH
86TH
ELDER
MEADOW
LAR
GE
HIGHLA
ND
PIN
NA
CL
E
KA
TY
DID
CESSNA
HA
MIL
TO
NH
AM
MO
ND
PINE ST TO EB I94
MA
PLE
48TH
LARABEE
LAD
YS
LIP
PE
R
O D
ELL
KALEN
60TH ST NE TO WB I94
EA
GLE
TERRACE
JASMINE
LANGSTON
KARM
EN
NA
RR
OW
EA
KE
RN
BIS
ON
QU
AIL
WOODLAWN
BUFFALO RIDGE
GIF
FO
RT
MILL TRAIL
JAM
BO
R
LAK
EV
IEW
NA
NT
UC
KE
T
QU
IGLE
Y
HA
ML
INE
JANN
ING
S
CR
OW
RIV
ER
PA
RK
VIE
W
HA
RR
ING
TO
N
PALISADES
MA
RT
IN F
AR
MS
QU
EN
RO
E
UPLAND
GREENBRIAR
SA
DD
LEB
RO
OK
APPLE
LAN
SIN
G
45TH
KA
LEN
DA
JAN
SE
N
O D
ELL
93RD
75TH
90TH
KA
HL
PARK
62ND
KA
LEN
DA
20TH
85TH
73RD
20TH
94TH
59TH
88TH
96TH
85TH
JACKSON
78TH
45TH
72ND
DIVISION
79TH
JAB
ER
97TH
MA
RL
OW
E
83RD
95TH
5TH
60TH
DA
GU
E
34TH
JAN
SEN
67TH
73RD
37
PA
CK
AR
D
88TH
67TH
58TH
45TH
1ST
75TH
43RD
JANSEN
58TH
43RD
JAB
ER
MA
IN
67TH
56TH
4TH
NAS
ON
96TH
84TH
90TH
57TH
IFF
ER
T
JAL
GE
R
5THLA
RG
E
79TH
77TH
NE
ED
HA
M
JANDEL
72ND
54TH
KAHLER
83RD
DIVISION
60TH
1ST
89TH
44TH
NA
BE
R
37
O DEAN
OA
KW
OO
D
65TH
92ND
1ST
57TH
4THPINE
NA
BE
R
71ST
79TH
HA
UG
71ST
13TH
MASON
CA
LDE
R
85TH
78TH
PA
RE
LL
KA
GA
N
78TH
83RD
40TH
44TH
119
60TH
CA
HIL
L
MAPLE
O DAY
60TH
87TH
3RD
60TH
JAB
ER
5TH
47TH
35TH
NE
LMA
RK
7TH
OG
RE
N
79TH
LANGE
84TH
63RD
JAM
ISO
N
MA
CK
EN
ZIE
6TH
70TH
43RD
KA
GA
N
62ND
30TH
56TH
79TH
84TH
LAN
NO
N
17TH
KA
LLA
ND
92ND
NA
SH
UA
47TH
65TH
87TH
77TH
OCHOA
54TH
NA
PIE
R
59TH
KA
GA
N
GA
RR
ISO
N
77TH
91ST
HA
UG
PA
GE
56TH
HA
LSE
Y
12TH
78TH
90TH
3RD
QU
ALE
HEIGHTS
96TH
89TH
PULA
SKI
JAM
ES
JAM
ISO
N
77TH
BIRCH
97TH
FAL
LON
92ND
82ND
FAL
LON
72ND
17TH
LAB
EA
UX
DA
VE
RN
HA
UG
47TH
78TH
PA
CK
AR
D
3RD
50TH
PA
RE
LL
54TH
JAM
ISO
N
79TH
IBA
RR
A
80TH
88TH
OG
RE
N
90TH
55TH
MA
CIV
ER
54TH
95TH
56TH
53RD
RIV
ER
GA
RR
ISO
N
RIVERVIEW
O D
AY
JAB
ER
56TH
CE
DA
79TH
13TH
JAN
SE
N
96TH
16TH
O D
ELL
NAUGHTOR
101
4TH
91ST
MC
AL
LIS
TE
R
81ST
O D
AY
101ST
57TH
96TH
2ND
1ST
45TH
95TH
QU
AM
58TH
MA
SO
N
PA
DG
ET
T
9487TH
25TH
77TH
KAHLER
43RD
MA
CIV
ER
LAM
ON
T
65TH
10TH
42ND
94TH
DA
LTO
N
20THK
AD
LER
FE
NN
ING
HA
RD
ING
QU
AM
92ND
54TH
76TH
G¦WX
?¾A@ !"b$
GrWXGsWX
?²A@
?ûA@
Pulaski
Pelican
Beebe
GsWX
QR117
QR117
G«WX
G©WX
G±WX
QR119QR113
QR120
G̈WXGvWX
QR131
Buffalo
Hanover
SaintMichael
Otsego
Monticello
Albertville
G§WX
GrWX94
37
25
10TH
101
95TH
39
30TH
JASON
70TH
ED
MO
NS
ON
85TH
20TH
50TH
IFF
ER
T
90TH
LAB
EA
UX
55TH
45TH
KA
DLE
R
42ND
80TH
RIVER
O D
EA
N
35TH
15TH
72ND
CHELSEA
MA
IN
CA
NT
ER
BU
RY
53RD
PA
GE
8TH
SCHOOL
5TH
HA
ML
IN
PA
RR
ISH
EIS
EL
E
83RD
134
55
4TH
IBA
RR
A
CA
LDE
R
NA
SH
UA
MA
CIV
ER
LAN
DE
R
CA
HIL
L
GA
RR
ISO
N
60TH
CE
NTR
AL
BROADWAY
FRANKFORT
65TH
40TH
QU
EE
NS
MA
SO
N
CAMERON
HA
RD
ING
JAM
ISO
N
MC
AL
LIS
TE
R
77TH
FEN
NIN
G
43RD
49TH
PIN
E
DA
GU
E
LEO
QU
AM
67TH
56TH
BR
IAR
WO
OD
JAB
ER
ASH
PA
RK
91ST
CE
DA
R
DA
VE
RN
9TH
DA
VID
SO
N
DIVISION
QU
AD
AY
JAL
GE
R
75TH
PA
CK
AR
D
41ST
16TH
OG
RE
N
17TH
JAN
DE
L
96TH
BEEBE LAKE
WH
ITE
TAIL
PARNELL
OH
LA
ND
KA
HL
101ST
78TH
84TH O B
RIA
N
88TH
87TH
119
HAR
T
NA
BE
R
ELM
3RD
HA
LSE
Y
25TH
IBISBIRCH
HA
UG
RIVERVIEW
1ST
HA
LL
63RD
KAYLA
JAN
ET
T
58TH
82ND
52ND
MA
RV
IN
DUNDAS
47TH
ED
GE
WO
OD
FAL
LON
PA
RE
LL
81ST
PAR
K P
LAC
E
61ST
71ST
FAR
MS
TE
AD
BRADSHAW
12TH
OC
HO
A RA
WLI
NG
S
KA
DY
102ND
FRONTAGE
CARISSA 32ND
PULASKI
STARLING
JANSEN
WILLOW
KA
SS
EL
LIN
CO
LN
69TH
92N
D
74TH
21S
T
HA
NS
AC
K
JAMES
89TH
IRIS
KA
HLE
R
59TH
62ND
KAGAN
NE
ED
HA
M
BAKKEN
WA
JAC
KS
ON
DEER
ELK
105T
DA
RR
OW
DA
LE
36TH
RA
MS
LAM
BE
RT
13T
H
73RD
64TH
OA
KW
OO
D
11TH
QU
ALE
MA
RL
OW
E
OA
KR
IDG
E
79TH
MALLARD
94TH
LAC
HM
AN
DE
EG
AN
KA
LLA
ND
MA
YE
R
KA
LEN
DA
ME
LB
Y
KALI
BR
YA
NT
103RD
97TH
JAN
A
EA
KE
N
RA
ND
OLP
H
LAN
GE
MA
YE
LIN
68TH
TOWN CENTER
O DAY
34TH
CO
UN
TR
Y
54TH
57TH
SAVANNAH
OAK
KA
MA
26TH
NE
LMA
RK
99TH
93RD
FO
X
IDE
CA
RLI
NG
PAD
GE
TT
NA
DA
LA
MA
YF
IELD
QU
ILLEY
QUAKER
MA
RX
LINW
OO
D
IRV
INE
GILLARD
AS
PE
N
31ST
2ND
DA
LTO
N
66TH
PR
ES
CO
TT
FALCON
NA
PIE
R
44TH
GILB
ER
T
BATESG
AB
LER
PE
LICA
N
GO
OD
RIC
H
LAM
ON
T
IN
ES
OTA
W
LAN
NO
N
PR
IVA
TE
CHURCH
HEIGHTS
MEADOW OAK
KA
ED
ING
KA
ISE
R
KESTREL
REDFORD
FAIR
HILL
76TH
NA
SO
N
MA
RS
HA
LL
46TH
KA
ITLIN
BLU
EB
ILL
CE
NT
EN
NIA
L
OG
DE
N
DOVE
LAS
ALL
E
MA
CLY
NN
VALLEY
10TH ST
LAKETOWNE
CH
AM
BE
RLA
IN
NA
UG
HT
OR
PA
LM
GR
EN
18TH
RIVER MILL
MACKENZIE
PA
RS
ON
KA
HLE
N
RIDGE
KIT
TR
ED
GE
6TH
86TH
ELDER
MEADOW
LAR
GE
HIGHLA
ND
PIN
NA
CL
E
KA
TY
DID
CESSNA
HA
MIL
TO
NH
AM
MO
ND
PINE ST TO EB I94
MA
PLE
48TH
LARABEE
LAD
YS
LIP
PE
R
O D
ELL
KALEN
60TH ST NE TO WB I94
EA
GLE
TERRACE
JASMINE
LANGSTON
KARM
EN
NA
RR
OW
EA
KE
RN
BIS
ON
QU
AIL
WOODLAWN
BUFFALO RIDGE
GIF
FO
RT
MILL TRAIL
JAM
BO
R
LAK
EV
IEW
NA
NT
UC
KE
T
QU
IGLE
Y
HA
ML
INE
JANN
ING
S
CR
OW
RIV
ER
PA
RK
VIE
W
HA
RR
ING
TO
N
PALISADES
MA
RT
IN F
AR
MS
QU
EN
RO
E
UPLAND
GREENBRIAR
SA
DD
LEB
RO
OK
APPLE
LAN
SIN
G
45TH
KA
LEN
DA
JAN
SE
N
O D
ELL
93RD
75TH
90TH
KA
HL
PARK
62ND
KA
LEN
DA
20TH
85TH
73RD
20TH
94TH
59TH
88TH
96TH
85TH
JACKSON
78TH
45TH
72ND
DIVISION
79TH
JAB
ER
97TH
MA
RL
OW
E
83RD
95TH
5TH
60TH
DA
GU
E
34TH
JAN
SEN
67TH
73RD
37
PA
CK
AR
D
88TH
67TH
58TH
45TH
1ST
75TH
43RD
JANSEN
58TH
43RD
JAB
ER
MA
IN
67TH
56TH
4TH
NAS
ON
96TH
84TH
90TH
57TH
IFF
ER
T
JAL
GE
R
5THLA
RG
E
79TH
77TH
NE
ED
HA
M
JANDEL
72ND
54TH
KAHLER
83RD
DIVISION
60TH
1ST
89TH
44TH
NA
BE
R
37
O DEAN
OA
KW
OO
D
65TH
92ND
1ST
57TH
4THPINE
NA
BE
R
71ST
79TH
HA
UG
71ST
13TH
MASON
CA
LDE
R
85TH
78TH
PA
RE
LL
KA
GA
N
78TH
83RD
40TH
44TH
119
60TH
CA
HIL
L
MAPLE
O DAY
60TH
87TH
3RD
60TH
JAB
ER
5TH
47TH
35TH
NE
LMA
RK
7TH
OG
RE
N
79TH
LANGE
84TH
63RD
JAM
ISO
N
MA
CK
EN
ZIE
6TH
70TH
43RD
KA
GA
N
62ND
30TH
56TH
79TH
84TH
LAN
NO
N
17TH
KA
LLA
ND
92ND
NA
SH
UA
47TH
65TH
87TH
77TH
OCHOA
54TH
NA
PIE
R
59TH
KA
GA
N
GA
RR
ISO
N
77TH
91ST
HA
UG
PA
GE
56TH
HA
LSE
Y
12TH
78TH
90TH
3RD
QU
ALE
HEIGHTS
96TH
89TH
PULA
SKI
JAM
ES
JAM
ISO
N
77TH
BIRCH
97TH
FAL
LON
92ND
82ND
FAL
LON
72ND
17TH
LAB
EA
UX
DA
VE
RN
HA
UG
47TH
78TH
PA
CK
AR
D
3RD
50TH
PA
RE
LL
54TH
JAM
ISO
N
79TH
IBA
RR
A
80TH
88TH
OG
RE
N
90TH
55TH
MA
CIV
ER
54TH
95TH
56TH
53RD
RIV
ER
GA
RR
ISO
N
RIVERVIEW
O D
AY
JAB
ER
56TH
CE
DA
79TH
13TH
JAN
SE
N
96TH
16TH
O D
ELL
NAUGHTOR
101
4TH
91ST
MC
AL
LIS
TE
R
81ST
O D
AY
101ST
57TH
96TH
2ND
1ST
45TH
95TH
QU
AM
58TH
MA
SO
N
PA
DG
ET
T
9487TH
25TH
77TH
KAHLER
43RD
MA
CIV
ER
LAM
ON
T
65TH
10TH
42ND
94TH
DA
LTO
N
20THK
AD
LER
FE
NN
ING
HA
RD
ING
QU
AM
92ND
54TH
76TH
Wright County HSIP Signalized Intersection Improvements
Ü0 10.5
Miles
MPO Urbinized Area Expansion
Municipal Boundary
Signal Location City
Confirmation
Lights
Update Signal
Head Hardware (retro‐fit
backplates)
(Yellow Reflective Shield)
Update Signal to meet
MUTCD requirements
(ADA compliant push
buttons, landings and
curb ramps)
Countdown
timers
CSAH 18‐CSAH 39/CSAH 75 Monticello 1,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 7,000.00$
CSAH 19‐CSAH 18 Albertville 1,500.00$ 5,000.00$
CSAH 19‐57th St Albertville 1,500.00$
CSAH 19‐Birch Ave/Frankfort Pkwy St. Michael 1,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 7,000.00$
CSAH 19‐CSAH 37 Albertville $ 1,500.00 5,000.00$ $ 100,000.00 $ 7,000.00
CSAH 19‐Outlet Mall Albertville $ 1,500.00
CSAH 42‐85th St. Otsego 1,500.00$ 100,000.00$ 7,000.00$
CSAH 75‐Hart Blvd (Hospital) Monticello 1,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 7,000.00$
CSAH 75‐Hart Blvd Monticello 1,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 7,000.00$
13,500.00$ 30,000.00$ 400,000.00$ 42,000.00$
Project Total 485,500.00$
County nominated to provide consistancy throught the corridor
ADA compliant improvements required due to addition of push buttons
Strategy
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 1Density (per int. per yr): 0.2
Rate (per MVM): 3.4
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdTraffic Control Device: Signal
Entering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Adjacent Development: Present
Max Number Of Lanes Crossed: ≥ 4Presence of Sidewalk: Some, None
Presence of Refuge Island: -Presence of Transit Stop: -
Pedestrian Crossing Type: MarkingsTotal Stars
Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostHAWK: $150,000 $0
Median Refuge Island: $12,000 $0Curb Extension: $10,000 $0
Countdown Timers: $7,000 $7,000Leading Ped Interval: $25,000 $0
RRFB w/ Refuge Island: $20,000 $0RRFB: $15,000 $0
Upgrade Signal Head Hardware: $5,000 $5,000
Mini Roundabout: $3,000,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $2,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $12,000Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
Notes -
518.001
4/27/2020
$0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Update Signal to Meet
MUTCD Recommendation: Proactive $100,000 Each 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0
NoneNone
Markings
Present6
Some
Value Star AssignmentSignal
16,350
6.2 1.6 0.21.0 0.3 3.4
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
31 8 1
16,350
Urban (Ped/Bike) Intersection on CSAH 18 at CSAH 39/CSAH 75
7th StWrightSuburbanCommercial
18Traditional
PresentNV10,6505,700
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 1Density (per int. per yr): 0.2
Rate (per MVM): 3.4
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdContext Zone: Commercial
Traffic Control Device: SignalEntering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Leg Configuration: X
Major Division Type: Curb, Depressed,Barrier, Mixed
Alignment Skew (degrees): ≥ 10Adjacent Development: Present
Major Approach Speed Limit (mph): ≥40Minor Approach Speed Limit (mph: ≥35
Total Stars Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostRoundabout: $3,000,000 $0
Confirmation Lights: $1,500 $1,500Signalized RCI: $1,250,000 $0
RCI: $1,000,000 $0Upgrade Signal Hardware: $50,000 $0
Intersection Lighting: $15,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $3,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $1,500Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
16,350
Urban (Vehicle) Intersection on CSAH 18 at CSAH 39/CSAH 75
7th StWrightSuburbanCommercial
18Traditional
PresentNV10,6505,700
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
31 8 16.2 1.6 0.21.0 0.3 3.4
Value Star AssignmentCommercial
Signal16,350
X
Curb
0Present
4535
Major Approach LeftTurn Lane Phasing: Protected
Permitted,Permitted/Protected
1 st Major Approach Turn Lane Configuration:
LLTTR ≥ 2 Left Turn,≥ 2 Thru Lane
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 1Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
3
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Notes -
18.0014/27/2020
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 0Density (per int. per yr): 0.0
Rate (per MVM): 0.0
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdTraffic Control Device: Signal
Entering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Adjacent Development: Present
Max Number Of Lanes Crossed: ≥ 4Presence of Sidewalk: Some, None
Presence of Refuge Island: -Presence of Transit Stop: -
Pedestrian Crossing Type: MarkingsTotal Stars
Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostHAWK: $150,000 $0
Median Refuge Island: $12,000 $0Curb Extension: $10,000 $0
Countdown Timers: $7,000 $0Leading Ped Interval: $25,000 $25,000
RRFB w/ Refuge Island: $20,000 $0RRFB: $15,000 $0
Upgrade Signal Head Hardware: $5,000 $5,000
Mini Roundabout: $3,000,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $2,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $30,000Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
Notes -
918.022
4/27/2020
$0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Update Signal to Meet
MUTCD Recommendation: Proactive $100,000 Each 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 1
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0
NoneNone
Markings
None6
Some
Value Star AssignmentSignal
21,750
5.4 1.0 0.00.7 0.1 0.0
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
27 5 0
21,750
Urban (Ped/Bike) Intersection on CSAH 18 at La Beaux Ave NE
La Beaux Ave NEWrightSuburbanResidential
18Traditional
PresentNone14,8006,950
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 0Density (per int. per yr): 0.0
Rate (per MVM): 0.0
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdContext Zone: Commercial
Traffic Control Device: SignalEntering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Leg Configuration: X
Major Division Type: Curb, Depressed,Barrier, Mixed
Alignment Skew (degrees): ≥ 10Adjacent Development: Present
Major Approach Speed Limit (mph): ≥40Minor Approach Speed Limit (mph: ≥35
Total Stars Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostRoundabout: $3,000,000 $0
Confirmation Lights: $1,500 $1,500Signalized RCI: $1,250,000 $0
RCI: $1,000,000 $0Upgrade Signal Hardware: $50,000 $0
Intersection Lighting: $15,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $3,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $1,500Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
21,750
Urban (Vehicle) Intersection on CSAH 18 at La Beaux Ave NE
La Beaux Ave NEWrightSuburbanResidential
18Traditional
PresentNone14,8006,950
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
27 5 05.4 1.0 0.00.7 0.1 0.0
Value Star AssignmentResidential
Signal21,750
X
Curb
0None
5545
Major Approach LeftTurn Lane Phasing:
Permitted/Protected
Permitted,Permitted/Protected
1 st Major Approach Turn Lane Configuration:
LTTR ≥ 2 Left Turn,≥ 2 Thru Lane
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 1Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
7
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Notes -
18.0224/27/2020
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 1Density (per int. per yr): 0.2
Rate (per MVM): 3.2
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdTraffic Control Device: Signal
Entering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Adjacent Development: Present
Max Number Of Lanes Crossed: ≥ 4Presence of Sidewalk: Some, None
Presence of Refuge Island: -Presence of Transit Stop: -
Pedestrian Crossing Type: MarkingsTotal Stars
Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostHAWK: $150,000 $0
Median Refuge Island: $12,000 $0Curb Extension: $10,000 $0
Countdown Timers: $7,000 $7,000Leading Ped Interval: $25,000 $0
RRFB w/ Refuge Island: $20,000 $0RRFB: $15,000 $0
Upgrade Signal Head Hardware: $5,000 $0
Mini Roundabout: $3,000,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $2,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $107,000Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
Notes -
319.030
4/27/2020
$100,000
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Update Signal to Meet
MUTCD Recommendation: Proactive $100,000 Each 1
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0
NoneNone
Markings
Present6
Some
Value Star AssignmentSignal
17,075
4.6 1.4 0.00.7 0.2 0.0
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
23 7 0
17,075
Urban (Ped/Bike) Intersection on CSAH 19 at 57th St NE
57th St NEWrightSuburbanResidential
19Traditional
PresentNV11,9505,125
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 1Density (per int. per yr): 0.2
Rate (per MVM): 3.2
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdContext Zone: Commercial
Traffic Control Device: SignalEntering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Leg Configuration: X
Major Division Type: Curb, Depressed,Barrier, Mixed
Alignment Skew (degrees): ≥ 10Adjacent Development: Present
Major Approach Speed Limit (mph): ≥40Minor Approach Speed Limit (mph: ≥35
Total Stars Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostRoundabout: $3,000,000 $0
Confirmation Lights: $1,500 $1,500Signalized RCI: $1,250,000 $0
RCI: $1,000,000 $0Upgrade Signal Hardware: $50,000 $0
Intersection Lighting: $15,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $3,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $1,500Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
17,075
Urban (Vehicle) Intersection on CSAH 19 at 57th St NE
57th St NEWrightSuburbanResidential
19Traditional
PresentNV11,9505,125
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
23 7 04.6 1.4 0.00.7 0.2 0.0
Value Star AssignmentResidential
Signal17,075
X
Curb
0Present
3030
Major Approach LeftTurn Lane Phasing:
Permitted/Protected
Permitted,Permitted/Protected
1 st Major Approach Turn Lane Configuration:
LTTR ≥ 2 Left Turn,≥ 2 Thru Lane
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 1Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
10
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Notes -
19.0304/27/2020
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 0Density (per int. per yr): 0.0
Rate (per MVM): 0.0
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdTraffic Control Device: Signal
Entering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Adjacent Development: Present
Max Number Of Lanes Crossed: ≥ 4Presence of Sidewalk: Some, None
Presence of Refuge Island: -Presence of Transit Stop: -
Pedestrian Crossing Type: MarkingsTotal Stars
Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostHAWK: $150,000 $0
Median Refuge Island: $12,000 $0Curb Extension: $10,000 $0
Countdown Timers: $7,000 $7,000Leading Ped Interval: $25,000 $0
RRFB w/ Refuge Island: $20,000 $0RRFB: $15,000 $0
Upgrade Signal Head Hardware: $5,000 $5,000
Mini Roundabout: $3,000,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $2,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $12,000Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
Notes -
1819.024
4/27/2020
$0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Update Signal to Meet
MUTCD Recommendation: Proactive $100,000 Each 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0
NoneNone
Markings
None6
Some
Value Star AssignmentSignal
14,025
2.0 0.2 0.00.4 0.0 0.0
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
10 1 0
14,025
Urban (Ped/Bike) Intersection on CSAH 19 at Birch Ave
Birch AveWrightSuburbanResidential
19Traditional
PresentNV11,6002,425
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 0Density (per int. per yr): 0.0
Rate (per MVM): 0.0
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdContext Zone: Commercial
Traffic Control Device: SignalEntering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Leg Configuration: X
Major Division Type: Curb, Depressed,Barrier, Mixed
Alignment Skew (degrees): ≥ 10Adjacent Development: Present
Major Approach Speed Limit (mph): ≥40Minor Approach Speed Limit (mph: ≥35
Total Stars Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostRoundabout: $3,000,000 $0
Confirmation Lights: $1,500 $1,500Signalized RCI: $1,250,000 $0
RCI: $1,000,000 $0Upgrade Signal Hardware: $50,000 $0
Intersection Lighting: $15,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $3,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $1,500Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
14,025
Urban (Vehicle) Intersection on CSAH 19 at Birch Ave
Birch AveWrightSuburbanResidential
19Traditional
PresentNV11,6002,425
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
10 1 02.0 0.2 0.00.4 0.0 0.0
Value Star AssignmentResidential
Signal14,025
X
Curb
0None
3030
Major Approach LeftTurn Lane Phasing:
Permitted/Protected
Permitted,Permitted/Protected
1 st Major Approach Turn Lane Configuration:
LTTR ≥ 2 Left Turn,≥ 2 Thru Lane
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 1Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
22
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Notes -
19.0244/27/2020
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 0Density (per int. per yr): 0.0
Rate (per MVM): 0.0
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdTraffic Control Device: Signal
Entering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Adjacent Development: Present
Max Number Of Lanes Crossed: ≥ 4Presence of Sidewalk: Some, None
Presence of Refuge Island: -Presence of Transit Stop: -
Pedestrian Crossing Type: MarkingsTotal Stars
Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostHAWK: $150,000 $0
Median Refuge Island: $12,000 $0Curb Extension: $10,000 $0
Countdown Timers: $7,000 $7,000Leading Ped Interval: $25,000 $0
RRFB w/ Refuge Island: $20,000 $0RRFB: $15,000 $0
Upgrade Signal Head Hardware: $5,000 $0
Mini Roundabout: $3,000,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $2,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $107,000Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
Notes -
719.032
4/27/2020
$100,000
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Update Signal to Meet
MUTCD Recommendation: Proactive $100,000 Each 1
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0
NoneNone
Markings
Present6
Some
Value Star AssignmentSignal
26,550
7.2 1.4 0.00.7 0.1 0.0
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
36 7 0
26,550
Urban (Ped/Bike) Intersection on CSAH 19 at CSAH 37
CSAH 37WrightSuburbanCommercial
19Traditional
PresentNV17,7008,850
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 0Density (per int. per yr): 0.0
Rate (per MVM): 0.0
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdContext Zone: Commercial
Traffic Control Device: SignalEntering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Leg Configuration: X
Major Division Type: Curb, Depressed,Barrier, Mixed
Alignment Skew (degrees): ≥ 10Adjacent Development: Present
Major Approach Speed Limit (mph): ≥40Minor Approach Speed Limit (mph: ≥35
Total Stars Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostRoundabout: $3,000,000 $0
Confirmation Lights: $1,500 $0Signalized RCI: $1,250,000 $0
RCI: $1,000,000 $0Upgrade Signal Hardware: $5,000 $5,000
Intersection Lighting: $15,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $3,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $5,000Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
26,550
Urban (Vehicle) Intersection on CSAH 19 at CSAH 37
CSAH 37WrightSuburbanCommercial
19Traditional
PresentNV17,7008,850
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
36 7 07.2 1.4 0.00.7 0.1 0.0
Value Star AssignmentCommercial
Signal26,550
X
Curb
0Present
3030
Major Approach LeftTurn Lane Phasing:
Permitted/Protected
Permitted,Permitted/Protected
1 st Major Approach Turn Lane Configuration:
LTTR ≥ 2 Left Turn,≥ 2 Thru Lane
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 0Proactive Per Intersection 1
6
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Notes -
19.0324/27/2020
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 0Density (per int. per yr): 0.0
Rate (per MVM): 0.0
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdTraffic Control Device: Signal
Entering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Adjacent Development: Present
Max Number Of Lanes Crossed: ≥ 4Presence of Sidewalk: Some, None
Presence of Refuge Island: -Presence of Transit Stop: -
Pedestrian Crossing Type: MarkingsTotal Stars
Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostHAWK: $150,000 $0
Median Refuge Island: $12,000 $0Curb Extension: $10,000 $0
Countdown Timers: $7,000 $7,000Leading Ped Interval: $25,000 $0
RRFB w/ Refuge Island: $20,000 $0RRFB: $15,000 $0
Upgrade Signal Head Hardware: $5,000 $0
Mini Roundabout: $3,000,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $2,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $107,000Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
Notes -
3342.006
4/27/2020
$100,000
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Update Signal to Meet
MUTCD Recommendation: Proactive $100,000 Each 1
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0
NoneNone
Markings
None7
Some
Value Star AssignmentSignal9,765
0.6 0.0 0.00.2 0.0 0.0
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
3 0 0
9,765
Urban (Ped/Bike) Intersection on CSAH 42 at 85th St NE
85th St NEWrightSuburbanResidential
42Traditional
PresentNV7,9001,865
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 0Density (per int. per yr): 0.0
Rate (per MVM): 0.0
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdTraffic Control Device: Signal
Entering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Adjacent Development: Present
Max Number Of Lanes Crossed: ≥ 4Presence of Sidewalk: Some, None
Presence of Refuge Island: -Presence of Transit Stop: -
Pedestrian Crossing Type: MarkingsTotal Stars
Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostHAWK: $150,000 $0
Median Refuge Island: $12,000 $0Curb Extension: $10,000 $0
Countdown Timers: $7,000 $7,000Leading Ped Interval: $25,000 $0
RRFB w/ Refuge Island: $20,000 $0RRFB: $15,000 $0
Upgrade Signal Head Hardware: $5,000 $5,000
Mini Roundabout: $3,000,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $2,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $12,000Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
Notes -
875.054
4/27/2020
$0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Update Signal to Meet
MUTCD Recommendation: Proactive $100,000 Each 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0
NoneNone
Markings
Present6
Some
Value Star AssignmentSignal9,892
0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
0 0 0
9,892
Urban (Ped/Bike) Intersection on CSAH 75 at Hospital
Hart BlvdWrightSuburbanCampus
75Traditional
PresentNV9,300592
Roadway Information
Description: County:
Area Type:Context Zone:
Segment Route System: CSAHSegment Route No:
Design Type: Configuration: X
Traffic Control Device: SignalStreet Lights:
Flasher: Major ADT:Minor ADT:
Total Entering ADT:
Crash Data5-year Crash History (2011 - 2015)
Crash Frequency: 0Density (per int. per yr): 0.0
Rate (per MVM): 0.0
Systemic Safety Risk Factors
ThresholdTraffic Control Device: Signal
Entering ADT(vpd): ≥ 12,000Adjacent Development: Present
Max Number Of Lanes Crossed: ≥ 4Presence of Sidewalk: Some, None
Presence of Refuge Island: -Presence of Transit Stop: -
Pedestrian Crossing Type: MarkingsTotal Stars
Priority Location
List of Strategies Considered
Unit Cost Total CostHAWK: $150,000 $0
Median Refuge Island: $12,000 $0Curb Extension: $10,000 $0
Countdown Timers: $7,000 $7,000Leading Ped Interval: $25,000 $0
RRFB w/ Refuge Island: $20,000 $0RRFB: $15,000 $0
Upgrade Signal Head Hardware: $5,000 $5,000
Mini Roundabout: $3,000,000 $0Upgrade Signs & Markings: $2,500 $0
Total Estimated Project Cost: $12,000Systemic Project
Project Page #: Intersection ID:
CRSP 2 Date:
Notes -
2075.056
4/27/2020
$0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Update Signal to Meet
MUTCD Recommendation: Proactive $100,000 Each 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 1Proactive Per Intersection 0
Proactive Each 0Proactive Per Intersection 0
Type Unit QuantityProactive Per Intersection 0
NoneNone
Markings
None6
Some
Value Star AssignmentSignal9,892
0.2 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.0
Total Severe Total Right Angle
Severe Right Angle
1 0 0
9,892
Urban (Ped/Bike) Intersection on CSAH 75 at Hart Blvd
Hart BlvdWrightSuburbanCommercial
75Traditional
PresentNV9,300592
CITY OF
Monticello
October 11, 2021
Dear Grant Reviewers.
PHONE: 763-295-2711 FAX: 763-295-4404
505 Walnut Street ISuite 1 IMonticello, MN 55362
The City of Monticello is pleased to support the Wright County’s grant application for the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP). This project was identified in the Wright County Road Safety Plan and would help
improve the safety on roadways throughout Wright County.
This project is proposed to update three intersections within the City of Monticello as well as
others within the County. The proposed signal upgrades will improve the safety for both
motorists and pedestrians at these busy intersections on the county’s roadway network.
I encourage you to support Wright County’s application for these significant safety improvements
for our community.
Sincerely,
Lloyd Hilgart
Mayor
www.ci.monticello.mn.us