2G Spectrum Scam

2G spectrum scamFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2G spectrum scam involved politicians and government officials in India illegally undercharging mobile

telephony companies for frequency allocation licenses, which they would then use to create 2G subscriptions

for cell phones. The shortfall between the money collected and the money that the law mandated to be

collected is estimated to be 1766.45 billion (US$30 billion), as valued by the Controller and Auditor General of

India based on 3G and BWA spectrum auction prices in 2010.[1] However, the exact loss is disputed. In

a chargesheet filed on 2 April 2011 by the investigating agency, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the loss

was pegged at 309845.5 million (US$5.2 billion)[2]whereas on 19 August 2011 in a reply to CBI, Telecom

Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) said that the government gained over 30 billion (US$510 million) by

giving 2G spectrum.[2] Similarly Kapil Sibal, the Minister of Communications & IT, claimed in 2011, during a

press conference, that "zero loss" was caused by distributing 2G licenses onfirst-come-first-served basis.[3] It

has to be pointed out, however, that "zero loss" can simply mean that frequencies were not sold for less than

cost. The phrase indicates nothing about whether the sale was a scam.

All the speculations of profit, loss and no-loss were put to rest on 2 February 2012 when the Supreme Court of

India delivered judgement on a public interest litigation (PIL)which was directly related to the 2G spectrum

scam. The Supreme Court declared allotment of spectrum as "unconstitutional and arbitrary" and quashed all

the 122 licenses issued in 2008 during tenure of A. Raja (then minister for communications & IT) the main

official accused in the 2G scam case.[4] The court further said that A. Raja "wanted to favour some companies

at the cost of the public exchequer" and "virtually gifted away important national asset."[5] The "zero loss

theory" was further demolished[6] on 3 August 2012 when as per the directions of the Supreme Court, Govt of

India revised the base price for 5 MHz 2G spectrum auction to 140 billion (US$2.4 billion), which roughly gives

the value of spectrum to be around 28 billion (US$470 million) per MHz that is close to the CAG's estimate

of 33.5 billion (US$570 million) per MHz.[7][8]

The original plan for awarding licences was to follow a first-come-first-served policy to applicants. A. Raja

manipulated the rules so that the first-come-first-served policy would kick in – not on the basis of who applied

first for a license but who complied with the conditions.[9] On 10 January 2008, companies were given just a few

hours to provide their Letters of Intent and cheques. Those allegedly tipped off by Raja were waiting with their

cheques and other documents. Some of their executives were sent to jail along with the minister.[9]

In 2011, Time magazine listed the scam at number two on their "Top 10 Abuses of Power" list (just behind

the Watergate scandal).[10][11][12]

Contents

[hide]

1 Background

2 Parties accused of involvement

o 2.1 Politicians accused

2.1.1 A. Raja

2.1.2 M. K. Kanimozhi

2.1.3 Pramod Mahajan

o 2.2 Bureaucrats accused

2.2.1 Siddharth Behura

2.2.2 RK Chandolia

o 2.3 Corporate executives accused

2.3.1 Sanjay Chandra

2.3.2 Gautam Doshi

2.3.3 Hari Nair

2.3.4 Surendra Pipara

2.3.5 Vinod Goenka

2.3.6 Shahid Balwa

2.3.7 Asif Balwa (younger brother of Shahid Balwa)

2.3.8 Rajiv Agarwal

2.3.9 Sharath Kumar

2.3.10 Ravi Ruia

2.3.11 Anshuman Ruia

2.3.12 Vikas Saraf

2.3.13 IP Khaitan

2.3.14 Kiran Khaitan

o 2.4 Film and entertainment persons accused

2.4.1 Karim Morani

o 2.5 Corporations accused

2.5.1 Unitech Wireless

2.5.2 Reliance Telecom

2.5.3 Swan Telecom

o 2.6 Media role

3 Chronology of events and investigation

o 3.1 2007

o 3.2 2008

o 3.3 2009

o 3.4 2010

o 3.5 2011

o 3.6 2012

o 3.7 2013

4 Licenses quashed

o 4.1 Telecom companies affected by cancellation of licenses

o 4.2 Aftereffects of Supreme Court's verdict

5 Aircel-Maxis deal controversy

6 Response to scam

7 Joint Parlimentary Commitee

8 See also

9 External links

10 References

Background[edit source | editbeta]

India is divided into 22 telecom zones, with 281 zonal licenses in the market.[13] According to the telecom policy

of India, when a licence is allotted to an operator, some start-up spectrum is bundled along with it.[14] The policy

does not have a provision for auctioning the spectrum.[15] In 2008, 122 new second generation (2G) Unified

Access Service (UAS) licenses were given to telecom companies at the 2001 price and on a first-come-first-

serve basis. As per the chargesheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), several rules were

violated and bribes were paid to favour certain firms while awarding 2G spectrum licenses. The audit report

of Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) says that several licenses were issued to firms with no prior

experience in the telecom sector or were ineligible or had suppressed relevant facts.[16] In November

2007 Prime Minister of India Dr Manmohan Singh had written a letter to telecom minister A. Raja directing him

to ensure allotment of 2G spectrum in a fair and transparent manner and to ensure license fee was properly

revised. Raja wrote back to the prime minister rejecting many of his recommendations.[17] In the same

month Ministry of Finance wrote a letter to Department of Telecommunications (DOT) raising concerns over the

procedure adopted by it[17] but DOT went ahead with its plan of giving 2G licenses. It advanced the cut-off date

to 25 September, from 1 October 2007.[17] Later on the same day, DoT posted an announcement on its website

saying those who apply between 3.30 and 4.30 pm on that very day would be issued licences in accordance

with the said policy.[17] Companies like Unitech and Swan Telecom got licenses without any telecom

experience.[15]

Swan Telecom got the license even though it did not meet eligibility criteria.[15] Swan got license for 15.37

billion (US$260 million) and then it sold 45% stake to UAE-based company Etisalat for 42

billion (US$710 million).[15] Unitech Wireless, a subsidiary of the Unitech Group, got license for 16.61

billion (US$280 million) and later sold 60% stake for 62 billion (US$1.0 billion) to Norway-based

company Telenor.[15]

Following is the list of companies who received 2G licenses during the tenure of A. Raja as Telecom Minister.

[18][19] (The licenses were later quashed by Supreme Court)[20][21]

Name of Company

Telecom regions for which license was granted

Number of license granted

Remarks

Adonis Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh (East)

6

Adonis Projects, Nahan Properties, Aska Projects, Volga Properties, Azare Properties & Hudson Properties were acquired by Unitech. Unitech Infrastructure and Unitech Builders & Estates were already subsidiaries of Unitech Group. So in 2008 Unitech had 22 2G licenses. Later in the same year Norway based company Telenor bought majority stake in the telecom company from the Unitech Group. Now it offers services under Uninor brand holding 22 pan India licences.

Nahan Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Assam, Bihar, North East, Orissa, Uttar Pradesh (East), West Bengal

6

Aska Projects Ltd.Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka

3

Volga Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra

3

Azure Properties Ltd.

Kolkata 1

Hudson Properties Delhi 1

Unitech Builders & Estates Pvt. Ltd.

Tamil Nadu (including Chennai)

1

Unitech Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.

Mumbai 1

Loop Telecom Pvt. Ltd.

Bihar, Gujarat, Himachal, Pradesh, Kerala, Kolkata, Punjab, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh (East), Uttar Pradesh (West), West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, Haryana, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Odisha, Tamil Nadu (including Chennai), Assam, Jammu & Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, North East

21

Datacom Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Karnataka, Kerala, Kolkata,

21 Operates under brand name Videocon Telecommunications Limited

Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, North East, Odisha, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu (including Chennai), Uttar Pradesh (East), Uttar Pradesh (West), West Bengal, Delhi, Mumbai

Shyam Telelink Limited

Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Kolkata, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh (East), Uttar Pradesh (West), West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, Haryana, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Odisha, Tamil Nadu (including Chennai), Assam, Jammu & Kashmir, North East

17Shyam Telelink Limited & Shyani Telelink Limited operate together with their combined 21 licenses. During late 2008 Russia based group Sistema bought majority stake in the telecom company and now they operate under brand name MTS India.

Shyani Telelink Limited

Mumbai, Bihar, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh

4

Swan Telecom Pvt. Ltd.

Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu (including Chennai), Uttar Pradesh (East), Uttar Pradesh (West), Delhi, Mumbai

13 In 2008, Swan Telecom merged itself with Allianz Infratech (P) Ltd. During late 2008 Abu Dhabi's Etisalat bought about 45 percent of the company and renamed it toEtisalat DB Telecom

Allianz Infratech (P) Ltd.

Bihar, Madhya Pradesh 2

Idea Cellular

Assam, Punjab, Karnataka, Jammu and Kashmir, North East, Kolkata, West Bengal, Odisha, Tamil Nadu (including Chennai)

9Idea Cellular bought Spice Communications Ltd. in 2008 for an amount of 27 billion(US$460 million).[22] So out of 122 spectrum licenses sold in 2008 Idea Cellular owns 13 licenses. However of the 13 licenses, only 7 of the licenses are in use by the company and the rest are overlapping licenses.[23]Spice

Communications Ltd.

Delhi, Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, Maharashtra

4

S TelAssam, Jammu and Kashmir, Odisha, North East, Bihar, Himachal Pradesh

6

In January 2009, Bahrain Telecommunications signed a deal with S Tel to buy 49% shares in S Tel for $225 million. C Sivasankaran owns the remaining (51%) share.[24][25] In May 2009, Sahara Group bought 11.7% stake in S Tel [26]

Tata TeleservicesJammu and Kashmir, Assam, North East

3

In late 2008 promoters of Tata Teleservices sold 26% equity stake to a Japanese telecom giant NTT Docomo for about 130.7 billion (US$2.2 billion) or an enterprise value of 502.69 billion (US$8.5 billion).[27]

Parties accused of involvement[edit source | editbeta]

The selling of the licenses brought attention to three groups of entities – politicians and bureaucrats who had

the authority to sell licenses, corporations who were buying the licenses and media professionals who

mediated between the politicians and the corporations.

Politicians accused[edit source | editbeta]

Politicians named as accused in the chargesheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and

the Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation in the Special CBI Court, allegations levelled against them

by CBI and charges framed against them by the Special CBI court.[28][29][30][31]

A. Raja[edit source | editbeta]

Political career – Political party DMK, four times Member of Parliament, present constituency Nilgiris,

Tamil Nadu, former Union Minister of State (Rural Development – 1999), former Union Minister of State

(Health and Family Welfare – 2003), former Union Cabinet Minister (Environment & Forests – 2004),

former Union Cabinet Minister (Communication and Information Technology – 2007 & 2009)[32][33][34][35]

Allegation – In a joint investigation report prepared by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Income

Tax Department the agencies allege that A.Raja could have received 30 billion (US$510 million) as bribe

for bringing forward the cut-off date for applications for spectrum from the initial 1 October 2007 to 25

September 2007.[36][37]The deadline switch eliminated many applications, enabling Raja to favour a few with

spectrum.[36][37] The agencies also alleged that he used bank accounts under his wife's name in Mauritius

and Seychelles to channelise the kickbacks he received.[38] A chargesheet filed by CBI alleges that Raja

conspired with the accused, subverted the first-come first-served (FCFS) policy and waywardly redefined it

to ensure that Swan and Unitech got 2G licences.[39] He didn’t auction the 2G spectrum or adopt some

other market-determined methodology to determine its real valuation and instead benchmarked it to a rate

discovered in 2001, when the telecom sector was at a nascent stage.[39]

Charges – Criminal breach of trust by a public servant under section 409, criminal conspiracy under

section 120-B, cheating under section 420 & forgery under sections 468 and 471. Booked under

the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification.[28][40][41]

Status – Taken into custody (arrested) by CBI on 2 February 2011[42] On 9 May 2012 he applied for bail for

the first time since his arrest.[43][44] and was granted bail on 15 May 2012[45][46][47] As of August 2012, trial is

being conducted in Special CBI Court.[48]

M. K. Kanimozhi[edit source | editbeta]

Political career – Daughter of five-time Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, M. Karunanidhi. Political party DMK.

She is a Member of Parliament, representing Tamil Nadu in the Rajya Sabha (the upper house of Indian

Parliament).[49][50]

Allegation – As per the chargesheet filed by CBI Kanimozhi has 20% stake in her family owned Kalaignar

TV, her step-mother Dayalu Ammal owns 60% stake in the same channel.[51] CBI alleges that Kanimozhi

was an "active brain" behind the channel's operations[51] and she worked along with former telecom

minister A. Raja to get DB Realty promoter Shahid Balwa to circuitously route 2 billion (US$34 million)

to Kalaignar TV.[52] According to CBI, Kanimozhi was in regular touch with A Raja regarding launching of

Kalaignar TV channel and its other pending works.[52] CBI alleges that A Raja was further pursuing the

cause of Kalaignar TV not only for getting registration of the company from Ministry of Information and

Broadcasting but also for getting it in the DTH operator TATA Sky's bouquet. She was also summoned by

the Income Tax Department, Chennai for alleged tax evasion charges.[52]

Charges – Criminal conspiracy to cause criminal breach of trust by a public servant, criminal conspiracy

under section 120-B, cheating under section 420 & forgery under sections 468 and 471. Booked under

the Prevention of Corruption Act.[28][40]

Status – Taken into custody (arrested) by CBI on 20 May 2011.[53][54] Granted bail on 28 November 2011

after spending 188 days in judicial custody.[55][56] As of August 2012, trial is being conducted in Special CBI

Court.[48]

Pramod Mahajan[edit source | editbeta]

CBI decided to include the name of late Pramod Mahajan in a separate column of the charge sheet to be filed

by it soon against three cellular companies and former officials in connection with alleged irregularities in

spectrum allocation during NDA regime causing a loss of Rs 5.08 billion to the exchequer.[57]

Bureaucrats accused[edit source | editbeta]

Bureaucrats named as accused in the chargesheet filed by CBI in the Special CBI Court, allegations levelled

against them by CBI and charges framed against them by the Special CBI court.[28][29][30][31]

Siddharth Behura[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Telecom Secretary when licenses were granted.[28][58]

Allegation – According to the chargesheet filed by CBI, Behura conspired with A. Raja & several other

accused. CBI alleges that when the application deadline time was declared as between 3:30 pm to

4:30 pm, Behura allegedly shut counters to physically block other telecom companies.[15]

Charges – Criminal breach of trust by a public servant under section 409, criminal conspiracy under

section 120-B, cheating under section 420 & forgery under sections 468 and 471. Booked under

the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting illegal gratification.[28][59]

Status – Taken into custody (arrested) by CBI on 2 February 2011[42] Granted bail on 9 May 2012[60][61] As

of August 2012, trial is being conducted in Special CBI Court.[48] Deposing before JPC on 10 July 2012,

Behura blamed A Raja, the then telecom Minister, for the most of decisions related to 2G spectrum

auctions.[62]

RK Chandolia[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Raja's private secretary when licenses were granted.[28][63]

Allegation – As per the charsheet filed by CBI, like Behura, Chandolia too conspired with A. Raja and

several other accused. The agency alleges that when the application deadline time was declared as

between 3:30 pm to 4:30 pm, Chandolia along with Behura allegedly shut counters to physically block

other telecom companies.[15]


under section 120 B, cheating under section 420 & forgery under sections 468 and 471. Booked under

the Prevention of Corruption Act [28]

Status – Taken into custody (arrested) by CBI on 2 February 2011.[42] Granted bail by the special CBI

court 1 December 2011 but on 2 December 2011 High Court took suo motu notice of newspaper reports of

the bail granted to Chandolia and stayed it.[64] Chandolia appealed against High Court order in Supreme

Court and on 9 May 2012 Supreme Court of India upheld the bail granted to RK Chandolia.[65] As of August

2012, trial is being conducted in Special CBI Court.[48]

Corporate executives accused[edit source | editbeta]

Corporates named as accused in the chargesheet filed by CBI in the Special Court and charges framed against

them by the Special court.[28][29][30][31]

Sanjay Chandra[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Former MD, Unitech Wireless [28]




Allegation – Ex-CBI prosecutor AK Singh was implicated in a taped conversation, sharing legal strategy

and secret information with the accused, Chandra.[66][67]

Status – Taken into custody by CBI on 20 April 2011,[68][69] granted bail on 24 November 2011.[70] As of

August 2012, trial is being conducted in Special CBI Court.[48]

Gautam Doshi[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Group MD, Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group [28]




Status – Taken into custody by CBI on 20 April 2011,[68] granted bail on 24 November 2011.[70] As of


Hari Nair[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Senior vice-president, Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group [28]


under section 120-B, cheating under section 420 & forgery under sections 468 and 471.Booked under




Surendra Pipara[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Senior vice- President, Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group [28]






Vinod Goenka[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Promoter and managing director, DB Realty & Swan Telecom [28]


under section 120 B, cheating under section 420, forgery under sections 468 and 471, fabrication of

evidence under section 193. Booked under the Prevention of Corruption Act [28]



Shahid Balwa[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Promoter, DB Realty & Swan Telecom [28]

Charges – Criminal conspiracy to cause criminal breach of trust by a public servant Criminal conspiracy

under section 120-B, cheating under section 420, forgery under sections 468 and 471 & fabrication of

evidence under section 193. Booked under the Prevention of Corruption Act.[28]

Status – Taken into custody by CBI on 8 February 2011,[71] granted bail on 29 November 2011.[72] As of


Asif Balwa (younger brother of Shahid Balwa)[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Director, Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables[28]



evidence under section 193. Booked under Prevention of Corruption Act [28]

Status – Taken into custody by CBI on 29 March 2011,[73] granted bail on 28 November 2011.[74] As of


Rajiv Agarwal[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Director, Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables[28]


under section 120-B, cheating under section 420, forgery under sections 468 and 471, fabrication of


Status – Taken into custody by CBI on 29 March 2011,[73] granted bail on 28 November 2011.[74] As of


Sharath Kumar[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – managing director, Kalaignar TV [28]




Status – Taken into custody by CBI on 20 May 2011,[75] granted bail on 28 November 2011.[76] As of


Ravi Ruia[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Vice chairman, Essar Group [77] [78]

Charges – Criminal conspiracy under section 120 B & cheating under section 420 of Indian Penal Code.[77]

[78]

Status – Not taken into custody yet.[79] As of August 2012, trial is being conducted in Special CBI Court.[48]

Anshuman Ruia[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Director, Essar Group [77] [78]


[78]


Vikas Saraf[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Director for strategy and planning, Essar Group [77] [78]


[78]


IP Khaitan[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Promotor, Loop Telecom [77] [78]


[78]


Kiran Khaitan[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – Promotor, Loop Telecom [77] [78]


[80]


Film and entertainment persons accused[edit source | editbeta]

Karim Morani[edit source | editbeta]

Designation – (Promoter and Director, Cineyug Films)[28]

Allegation – In the chargesheet filed by Income Tax Department the agency alleged that Karim Morani

owned Cineyug Films was a part of the circuitous route used by another accuse Shahid Balwa to transfer

illegal gratification[81] of 2 billion (US$34 million) to Kalaignar TV of which Kanimozhi, was a director.

[81] According to the chargesheet, Shahid Balwa and Vinod Goenka, promoters of DB Realty transferred

2092.5 million (US$35 million) to Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables of which Shahid Balwa's younger

brother Asif Balwa was a director.[81][82] Kusegaon Fruits & Vegetables then transferred a sum of 2

billion (US$34 million) to Cineyug Films whose promoter Karim Morani transferred it to Kalaignar TV [81]


under section 120-B, cheating under section 420, forgery under sections 468 and 471, fabrication of

evidence under section 193. Booked under the Prevention of Corruption Act [28]

Status – Taken into custody by CBI on 30 May 2011,[83] granted bail on 28 November 2011.[76] As of


Corporations accused[edit source | editbeta]

Companies named in the chargesheet filed by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and charges framed

against them.[28][29][30][31]

Unitech Wireless[edit source | editbeta]



the Prevention of Corruption Act.[28]

Status – As of August 2012, trial is being conducted in Special CBI Court.[48]

Reliance Telecom[edit source | editbeta]


under section 120-B, cheating under section 420, forgery under sections 468 and 471. Booked under



Swan Telecom[edit source | editbeta]


under section 120-B, cheating under section 420, forgery under sections 468 and 471. Booked under



Other companies named in the chargesheet are:[84][85][86]

Loop Telecom Pvt Ltd

Loop Mobile India Ltd

Essar Tele Holding

Essar (Parent group of Essar Tele Holding)

Media role[edit source | editbeta]

Main article: Radia tapes controversy

Media sources such as OPEN and Outlook reported that two senior journalists Barkha Dutt (group editor

of NDTV) and Vir Sanghvi (editorial director of Hindustan Times) knew that corporate lobbyist Nira Radia was

influencing the decisions of appointment of telecom minister. Radia wanted A Raja to be appointed as the

telecom minister.[87] The two magazines made public the telephone conversations between Nira Radia, Barkha

Dutt & Vir Sanghvi.[88][89] Radia's phones were being tapped by the Income Tax Department. Critics allege that

Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi knew about the nexus between the government and the media industry but still

they supported this corrupt activity and suppressed news reporting the discovery of the corrupt practice.[87]

Chronology of events and investigation[edit source | editbeta]

The Centre for Public Interest Litigation filed the first petition against the Union of India for irregularities in

awarding 2G spectrum licenses. The petition alleged that the government had lost $15.53 billion by issuing

spectrum in 2008 based on 2001 prices, and by not following a competitive bidding process. This led to further

petitions and the launch of a probe in 2010.[90]

2007[edit source | editbeta]

May 2007: A Raja takes over as Telecom Minister.[91]

August 2007: Process of allotment of 2G spectrum for telecom along with Universal Access Service

(UAS) Licences initiated by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT).

25 September 2007: Telecom Ministry issues press note fixing deadline for application as 1 October 2007.

1 October 2007: DoT receives 575 applications for UAS licences of 46 companies.[92]

2 November 2007: The prime minister writes to Raja directing him to ensure allotment of 2G spectrum in a

fair and transparent manner and to ensure that licence fee was properly revised. Raja writes back to the

prime minister rejecting many of his recommendations.

22 November 2007: Finance Ministry writes to DoT raising concerns over the procedure adopted by it.

Demand for review rejected.


10 January 2008: DoT decides to issue licences on first-come-first-serve basis, preponing the cut-off date

to 25 September, from 1 October 2007. Later on the same day, DoT posted an announcement on its

website saying those who apply between 3.30 pm and 4.30 pm would be issued licences in accordance

with the said policy.[93][94]

2008: Swan Telecom, Unitech and Tata Teleservices sell off a part of their stakes at much higher rates to

Etisalat, Telenor and DoCoMo, respectively.[95][96][97]


4 May 2009: An NGO Telecom Watchdog files complaint to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) on

the illegalities in the spectrum allocation to Loop Telecom.

19 May 2009: Another complaint was filed to the CVC by Arun Agarwal, highlighting grant of spectrum to

Swan Telecom at throwaway prices.

2009: CVC directs CBI to investigate the irregularities in allocation of 2G spectrum.

1 July 2009: Delhi HC holds advancing of cut-off date as illegal on a petition of telecom company S-Tel.[98]

21 October 2009: CBI registers a case and files an FIR against “unknown officers of DoT and unknown

private persons/companies under various provisions of IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

22 October 2009: Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation raids DoT offices.[99][100][101]

16 November 2009: CBI seeks details of tapped conversation of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia to find out

involvement of middlemen in the grant of spectrum to telecomcompanies. It has sought help from

the Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation regarding information on Ms. Nira Radia of M/s

Noesis Consultancy and records pertaining to middlemen regarding award of 2G spectrum licences


13 March 2010: SC upholds Delhi HC verdict on cut off date advancement as illegal[102][103]

31 March 2010: CAG says that there was large scale irregularities in the spectrum allocation .

2 April 2010: CBI DIG (Investigations) Vineet Agarwal IRS and Director General of Income Tax

(Investigations) Milap Jain IRS, who were investigating the case, transferred. Milap Jain was transferred as

Director General of International Taxation.[104]

6 May 2010: Telephonic conversation between Raja and Niira Radia taped by the Directorate General of

Income Tax Investigation made public by the media.[105]

May 2010: NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation moves the Delhi High Court seeking investigation into

the scam by SIT.

25 May 2010: Delhi HC dismisses the petition.

August 2010: Appeal filed in the Supreme Court against the High Court’s order.

18 August 2010: HC refuses to direct the prime minister to decide on a complaint by Janata Party

chief Subramanian Swamy seeking sanction to prosecute Raja for his involvement in 2G scam.

13 September 2010: SC asks government, Raja to reply within 10 days to three petitions filed by CPIL

and others alleging there was a 70000 crore (US$12 billion) scam in the grant of telecom licences in

2008.

24 September 2010: Swamy moves SC seeking direction to the PM to sanction prosecution of Raja.

27 September 2010: Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation informs SC of probe against firms

suspected to have violated FEMA. Says can’t deny or confirm now Raja’s involvement in the scam.

8 October 2010: SC asks government to respond to CAG report about the scam.[106]

21 October 2010: Draft reports of CAG placed before the Supreme Court.

29 October 2010: SC pulls up CBI for its tardy progress in the investigations into the scam.[107][108]

10 November 2010: CAG submits report on 2G spectrum to government stating loss of

176000 crore (US$30 billion) to exchequer.

11 November 2010: DoT files affidavit in SC saying CAG did not have the authority to question the policy

decision as per which licence were issued to new players in 2008.

14 November 2010: A Raja resigns as Telecom Minister[109][110]

15 November 2010: Kapil Sibal given additional charge of Telecom Ministry.[111][112]

20 November 2010: Affidavit on behalf of PM filed in Supreme Court. Rejects charge of inaction on

Swamy’s complaint.[113][114][115]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_rupee


22 November 2010: CBI and Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation tells SC it will file charge

sheet in the case within three months.

22 November 2010: CBI tells SC role of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia would be questioned by it.

24 November 2010: SC reserves verdict on Swamy’s plea seeking direction to PM for grant of sanction to

prosecute Raja.

25 November 2010: SC ticks off CBI for not questioning Raja.

29 November 2010: CBI files status report on 2G spectrum scam probe.

30 November 2010: SC questions CVC P J Thomas’s moral right to supervise CBI’s probe into 2G

spectrum scam as he himself was Telecom Secretary at that point of time.[116]

1 December 2010: SC directs original tapes containing conversation between corporate lobbyist Niira

Radia and others be handed over to it.

1 December 2010: Raja questions CAG findings in the SC.

2 December 2010: Government places recorded tapes in the SC from the Directorate General of Income

Tax Investigation.

2 December 2010: SC comes down heavily on Raja for bypassing and overruling PM’s advice to defer

allocation of 2G spectrum by a few days.

8 December 2010: SC favours including in the probe period since 2001 when first-come-first-serve was

the norm for spectrum allocation.

8 December 2010: SC asks Centre to consider setting up of a special court to try 2G spectrum scam case.

8 December 2010: Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation submits report. Says money trail

covers 10 countries, including Mauritius.

14 December 2010: Another PIL in SC seeking cancellation of new telecom licences and 2G spectrum

allocated during Raja’s tenure.

15 December 2010: Swamy files petition in a Delhi court seeking his inclusion as a public prosecutor in

2G spectrum case.

15 December 2010: Swamy mentions in complaint that Raja favoured "ineligible" private companies Swan

Telecom Pvt Ltd and Unitech Wireless Ltd in allocating the spectrum.

16 December 2010: SC decides to monitor the CBI inquiry[117][118][119]


4 January 2011: Swamy moves SC seeking cancellation of 2G spectrum licenses.

10 January 2011: Supreme Court issues notice to Centre on the plea seeking cancellation of 2G licenses.

Also issues notices to 11 companies which allegedly did not fulfill the roll-out obligations or were ineligible.

30 January 2011: Government’s decision to regularise licenses of the companies which failed to meet the

deadline for roll-out obligation challenged in the Supreme Court.

2 February 2011: Raja, former Telecom Secretary Siddharth Behura and Raja’s former Personal

Secretary R K Chandolia arrested and next day they were remanded in CBI custody.

8 February 2011: Raja remanded to two more days of CBI custody. Behura and Chandolia sent to judicial

custody.

8 February 2011: Shahid Usman Balwa, promoter of Swan Telecom, arrested by CBI.

10 February 2011: SC asks CBI to bring under its scanner corporate houses which were beneficiaries of

the 2G spectrum. Raja remanded to CBI custody for four more days by a special CBI court along with

Balwa.

14 February 2011: Raja’s CBI custody extended for three more days. Balwa’s custody extended for four

days.

17 February 2011: Raja sent to Tihar Jail under judicial custody.

18 February 2011: Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation questions Kani Mozhi in Chennai

Headquarters.

24 February 2011: Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation tells a Delhi court that Balwa

facilitated transaction to Kalaignar TV.

28 February 2011: Raja seeks judicial proceedings through video conferencing stating that he faces threat

to life from fellow prisoners.

1 March 2011: CBI tells SC that 63 persons are under scanner. Raja allowed by CBI court to appear

before it via video-conferencing.

14 March 2011: The Delhi High Court sets up special court to deal exclusively with 2G cases. Balwa also

allowed to appear via video-conferencing.

17 March 2011: SC reserves order on cancellation of 2G licenses. It rejected companies' claim saying

that Principle of Estoppel can't be applied to protect illegality.[120][121]

29 March 2011: SC permits CBI to file charge sheet on 2 April instead of 31 March. Two more persons –

Asif Balwa and Rajeev Agarwal – arrested.

2 April 2011: CBI files its first charge sheet in the 2G spectrum allocation scam.[122][123][124]

25 April 2011: CBI files second charge sheet and court issues summons to Kanimozhi, Sharad Kumar and

Karim Morani taking cognizance of the charge sheet.[125][126][127]

6 May 2011: Kanimozhi and Sharad Kumar appear before court and file bail pleas while Morani sought

exemption from appearance on medical ground.[128][129][130]

6 May 2011: SC issues contempt notice to Sahara India managing director Subroto Roy and two others for

alleged interference in the ongoing ED investigation into the 2G spectrum case.[131][132]

7 May 2011: Special CBI Court reserves order on Kanimozhi and Sharad Kumar’s bail applications.

14 May 2011: Special CBI Court defers order on their bail pleas for 20 May.

20 May 2011: Special CBI Court rejects bail pleas of Kanimozhi and Sharad Kumar and orders their

forthwith arrest saying that there was a possibility of witnesses being influenced considering the magnitude

of the crime.[133][134]

8 June 2011: Delhi HC judge Ajit Bharihoke rejects bail pleas of Kanimozhi and Sharad Kumar citing that

there are certain prima facie evidences against the accused and they may be in a position to influence the

2G probe[135][136]

20 June 2011: SC rejects Kanimozhi’s bail plea[137][138][139]

25 July 2011: Arguments on Charge begins. Raja seeks to make prime minister and former finance

minister P Chidambaram as witness.

26 August 2011: Special CBI court allows Subramanian Swamy to argue his own case (mainly to address

the possible loop holes in CBI investigation of the case)[140][141]

30 August 2011: Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation orders freezing of accounts, attachment

of properties worth 223 crore (US$38 million) of five companies mainly related to DB Realty under the

provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) [142] [143]

1 September 2011: ED files status report in Supreme Court, says there have been FEMA violation of

100 billion[144]

15 September 2011: Swamy pleads before special CBI court that P Chidambaram should be made co-

accused[145]

22 September 2011: CBI defends Chidambaram in SC, blames DoT for all wrongs.

26 September 2011: CBI moves plea for framing fresh charge for criminal breach of trust against Raja,

Chandolia and Behura.[146][147]

29 September 2011: CBI says role of Anil Ambani being probed, gives a virtual clean chit to Tata and

Videocon group.[148][149]

9 October 2011: CBI files FIR against Maran and his brother in Aircel-Maxis deal.[150][151][152]

10 October 2011: SC reserves order against Subramanian Swamy’s plea for a probe into Home Minister

Chidambaram’s role in the 2G scam.[153][154] On the same day CBI books former telecom minister

and DMK leader Dayanidhi Maran and his brother and media baron Kalanithi Maran [155]

22 October 2011: Special CBI Court finds prima facie evidence to put on trial all 17 accused including

Raja on various counts like criminal conspiracy, breach of trust, cheating and forgery.[156][157]

3 November 2011: Special CBI court dismisses bail pleas of all the 8 applicants (including Kanimozhi)[158]

8 November 2011: Special CBI court orders CBI to give copy of file on sale of equity by telecom

companies (for investigating P Chidambaram's involvement) to Swamy[159][160]


9 November 2011: Delhi HC refuses to grant interim bail to Karim Morani on health grounds wondering

Why everybody falls sick once he is in custody? HC issues notice to the CBI on its reply on the bail pleas

of the five accused by 1 December.[161][162]

11 November 2011: Trial of the 17 accused begins in Patiala House special CBI court.[163][164]

14 November 2011: UPA govt moves SC seeking to restrain Dr Subramanian Swamy from making public

allegations against the UPA leadership (especially Home Minister P Chidambaram and UPA

Chairperson Sonia Gandhi) in the 2G scam case[165][166]

22 November 2011: The Special CBI court shifts the trial to the Tihar Jail complex following a Delhi high

court order[167][168]

23 November 2011: SC grants bail to 5 corporate executives – Sanjay Chandra of Unitech Wireless,

Vinod Goenka of Swan Telecom as well as Reliance Group's Gautam Doshi, Surendra Pipara and Hari

Nayar.[169]

28 November 2011: HC grants bail to DMK MP Kanimozhi and 4 others namely Karim Morani, Sharad

Kumar and Asif Balwa and Rajeev Agarwal. The court upheld the principle of parity under Section 144 of

the Constitution of India that upholds an order passed by the SC.[170][171]

29 November 2011: The special CBI court grants bail to Shahid Balwa citing principle of parity

that SC and HC have already granted bail to 10 other accused[172][173]

1 December 2011: The special CBI court grants bail to A. Raja's ex-private secretary R. K. Chandolia and

puts additional condition to not visit the DoT without prior permission of the court[174][175]

2 December 2011: Taking a suo motu cognizance, HC stays bail given by trial court to R K Chandolia[176]

7 December 2011: SC stays HC's suo motu order against Chandolia's bail[177][178]

8 December 2011: The special CBI court accepts Swamy's plea against Chidambaram to become a

witness in his own complaint and examine 2 witnesses, including seniorCBI official and senior Finance

Ministry official[179][180]

12 December 2011: CBI files third charge sheet naming Essar Group promoters Ravi Ruia, his son

Anshuman Ruia and its director (Strategy and Planning) Vikas Saraf,Loop Telecom promoters Kiran

Khaitan (sister of Ravi Ruia) and her husband I P Khaitan. It also charge sheets Loop Mobile India Ltd, its

subsidiary Loop Telecom Pvt Ltd and Essar Tele Holding.[181][182]

16 December 2011: HC rejects bail plea of Siddharth Behura saying "he was the ‘perpetrator’ of the illegal

designs of Raja and would not claim benefit of parity with 10 others released on bail"[183]


2 February: The Supreme court of India cancelled all 122 licenses allotted by A Raja and imposed Rs

50 million (US$ 1,018,122) fine on Unitech, Swan and Tata Teleservices. It also imposed a fine of Rs

5 million on Loop Telecom Pvt Ltd, S-Tel, Allianz Infratech and Sistema Shyam Tele Services Ltd. It also

asked trial court to decide whether Home Minister P Chidambaram should be made co-accused in 2G

scam.[184][185]

4 February: The special court of justice O.P Saini dismissed the plea of Subramanian Swamy to make

then Finance Minister P.Chidambram as co-accused in the 2G scam.[186]

8 February: ED and Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation registers money laundering case

against DMK leader Dayanidhi Maran [187] and his brother Kalanithi Maran for allegedly receiving illegal

gratification of about 5.5 billion in the Aircel-Maxis deal.[188]

9 February: Essar Group and Loop Telecom approach Supreme Court against its trial before Special CBI

Court in 2G case.[189][190]

15 February: Supreme Court refused to grant interim stay on the summonses issued against Essar

Group, Loop Telecom and their officials by a special CBI court to appear before it on 22 February for their

alleged involvement in a 2G spectrum scam.[191]

22 February: CBI lodges strong protest with CVC on the "dirty tricks" of certain Income Tax officials to

intimidate and threaten crucial witnesses in the 2G case allegedly at the behest of DMK’s Minister of State

(Finance) SS Palanimanickam. Dr. Swamy said he would approach Supreme Court on this matter.[192]

23 February: Subramanian Swamy files petition in Supreme Court challenging trial court's order which had

dismissed Swamy's plea to make Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram as a co-accused in the 2G scam.

[193]

2 March: Govt of India files review petition in Supreme Court seeking partial review of the court's 2

February 2012 order which had quashed 122 licenses.[194] The Govt questioned Supreme Court's authority

over ruling against the first-come first-served policy but stayed away from challenging the cancellation of

122 licences issued during the tenure of A Raja as Telecom Minister.[195] On the same day former telecom

minister A Raja, Sistema, majority shareholder in MTS India, Uninor and other telecom companies too filed

a review petition in Supreme Court.[196]

4 April: Other than Government of India's partial review petition Supreme Court dismissed all 10 review

petitions.[197] The telecom companies whose review petition was dismissed include Videocon

Telecommunications Ltd, S Tel Ltd, Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd, Tata Teleservices Ltd, Unitech

Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt Ltd, Etisalat DB Telecom Pvt Ltd and Idea Cellular Ltd.[197]

12 April: Government filed Presidential reference in Supreme Court seeking the court's opinion on various

issues arising from its 2 February 2012 judgement[198]

9 May: Supreme Court granted bail to Siddharth Behura[199] and upheld RK Chandolia's bail.[200] On the

same day A Raja also applied for bail.[201]

15 May: Bail granted to A Raja with a condition to get court's permission for visiting Tamil Nadu [45] [46] He

walked out of Tihar jail after 15 months.[202]

6 June: Special CBI Court granted permission for Raja to visit Tamil Nadu[203]

3 July: Briefing the Joint parliamentary committee probing the scam, ED claimed that it has

enough evidence to convict DMK chief Karunanidhi's wife and daughterKanimozhi.[204]

31 July: Former DoT senior official AK Srivastava confirmed CBI's allegation in his testimony saying A

Raja as telecom minister was the final authority for taking decisions on policy matters. He in his statement

to CBI earlier had mentioned that Raja had recorded the cut—off date of 1 October 2007 for receiving

applications for grant of the 2G spectrum licences on a DoT file.[205]

1 August: The Supreme Court, hearing the Presidential reference on the ‘2G judgment,’ said

implementation of first served (FCFS) policy for allotment of spectrum was flawed. The Chief Justice of

India said, "The moment you change the criterion and distort the policy, it ceases to be FCFS policy. If you

insist on making payment at the last minute after changing the cut-off date, then it is not FCFS, it is an out-

of-turn policy."[206]

3 August: According to the directions of the Supreme Court, Govt of India revised the spectrum price to

140 billion (US$2.4 billion)[7] which demolished the "zero loss theory" and further established 1760

billion (US$30 billion) revenue loss calculated by CAG.[6]

9 August: The Government again sought extension of time from the Supreme Court till 12 November for

commencing auction of 2G spectrum licences. The court, while quashing 123 licences in February 2012,

had given four months for their fresh auction which was extended till 31 August.[207]

11 Nov: The daily trial in Justice OP Saini's special CBI court completes 1-year. Deposition of 77

witnesses out of a total of 154 witnesses complete.[208]


20 April: Senior MP of the Communist Party of India Gurudas Dasgupta accused Manmohan Singh of

“dereliction of duty”, alleging that the PM was fully aware of irregularities in dispensing of telecom licences.

He pointed out that in a letter in November 2007 Kamal Nath had advised the Prime Minister on setting up

of a Group of Ministers for allocation of spectrum. MP Dasgupta also referred to note from then Cabinet

Secretary, stating the value of licences of spectrum should be increased.[209][210]

23 April: In his 112-page written statement to the JPC, A. Raja said that he personally met Prime

Minister Manmohan Singh and P.Chidambaram several times between November 2007 and July 2008 —

the period when the scam was perpetrated — to keep him informed of all 2G-related decisions, and the

Prime Minister agreed with him.[211]

Licenses quashed[edit source | editbeta]

On 2 February 2012 Supreme Court of India delivered judgement on petitions filed by Subramanian

Swamy and Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) which had challenged allotment of 2G licenses granted

in 2008.[212] The Supreme Court quashed all 122 spectrum licences granted during the tenure of former

communications minister A Raja.[212] and described the allocation of 2G spectrum as "unconstitutional and

arbitrary".[213] The bench of Justice GS Singhvi & Justice AK Ganguly imposed fine of 50 million (US$850,000)

on Unitech Wireless, Swan telecom and Tata Teleservices and 5 million (US$85,000) fine on Loop

Telecom, S Tel, Allianz Infratech and Sistema Shyam Tele Services Ltd.[4] The Supreme Court's ruling said the

current licences will remain in place for four months, in which time the government should decide fresh norms

for issuing licences.[214]

The Supreme Court said in its order that then telecom minister A. Raja "wanted to favour some companies at

the cost of the public exchequer" and listed seven steps he took to ensure this happened.[4][215] According to the

Supreme Court of India the seven steps were :

1. After taking over as telecom minister, Raja directed that all applications received for UAS licences

should be kept pending till receipt of the Trai's recommendations.[4][215]

2. The recommendations made by Trai on 28 August 2007, were not placed before the full Telecom

Commission which would have included the finance secretary. The notice of the meeting of the

Telecom Commission was not given to any of the non-permanent members though Trai's

recommendations for allocation of 2G spectrum had serious financial implications and it was therefore

necessary for DoT to take the finance ministry's opinion under the Government of India (Transaction

of Business) Rules, 1961.[4][215]

3. The DoT officers who attended the Telecom Commission meeting held on 10 October 2007, had no

choice but to approve Trai's recommendations, since they would otherwise have "incurred" Raja's

"wrath".[4][215]

4. Since Cabinet had approved recommendations made by the Group of Ministers, the DoT had to

discuss the issue of spectrum pricing with the finance ministry. But, since Raja knew that the finance

secretary had objected to the allocation of 2G spectrum at rates fixed in 2001, he did not consult the

finance minister or other officials.[4][215]

5. Raja brushed aside the law minister's suggestion that the matter should be placed before the

empowered group of ministers. Also, within hours of the receipt of the suggestion made by the PM in

his letter dated 2 November 2007, that keeping in view the inadequacy of spectrum, transparency and

fairness should be maintained in allocation of the spectrum, Raja rejected it saying that it would be

unfair, discriminatory, arbitrary and capricious to auction spectrum to new applicants because it would

not give them a level-playing field. He also introduced a cut-off date of 25 September 2007, for

considering applications though only the previous day a DoT press release had said 1 October 2007,

would be the last date. This arbitrary action of Raja "though appears to be innocuous was actually

intended to benefit some of the real estate firms who did not have any experience in dealing with

telecom services and who had made applications only on 24 September 2007, i.e. one day before the

cut-off date fixed by the C&IT minister on his own".[4][215]

6. The cut-off date of 25 September 2007, decided by Raja on 2 November 2007, was not made public till

10 January 2008, and the first-come-first-served principle followed since 2003 was changed by him at

the last moment through a press release dated 10 January 2008. "This enabled some of the

applicants, who had access either to the minister or DoT officers, get bank drafts prepared towards

performance guarantee of about Rs 16 billion".[4][215]

7. "The manner in which the exercise for grant of LoIs to the applicants was conducted on 10 January

2008 leaves no room for doubt that everything was stage managed to favour those who were able to

know in advance change in the implementation of the first-come-first-served policy." As a result, some

firms which had submitted applications in 2004 or 2006 were pushed down in the priority and those

who had applied between August and September 2007 succeeded.[4][215]

Telecom companies affected by cancellation of licenses[edit source | editbeta]

The table below shows list of companies whose license were cancelled[216][217]

Name of company Parent groupNumber of

licenses cancelled

UninorJoint venture between Unitech Group of India and Telenor of Norway Unitech Group

22

Sistema Shyam TeleServices Limited, now MTS India

Joint venture between Shyam group of Indian and Sistema of Russia 21

Loop Mobile formerly BPL Mobile

Owned by Khaitan Holding Group 21

Videocon Telecommunications Limited

Owned by Videocon group of India 21

Etisalat-DB Joint venture between Swan Telecom of India and Etisalat of UAE 15

Idea CellularAditya Birla Groupof India (49.05%), Axiata Group Berhad of Malaysia (15%) & Providence Equity(10.6%)of USA

13

S Tel Joint venture between C Sivasankaran of India and Batelco of Bahrain. After the Supreme Court's decision Batelco sold its 42.7% stake to C

6

Name of company Parent groupNumber of

licenses cancelled

Sivasankaran company Sky City Foundation Ltd. for $175 million[218]

Tata Teleservices Owned by Tata Group of India 3

Aftereffects of Supreme Court's verdict[edit source | editbeta]

Batelco quits India – Batelco, the Bahrain telecommunications company holding 42.7% stake in S

Tel declared that it has agreed to sell its entire holding to Indian partner Sky City Foundation Ltd for 65.8

million Bahraini dinar ($174.5 million).[218][219][220]

Telenor terminates agreement and sues Unitech – On 21 February 2012 Telenor, majority stakeholder

in Uninor, terminated its agreement with its Indian partnerUnitech and sued it seeking "indemnity and

compensation".[221][222][223]

Etisalat sues Shahid Balwa and Vinod Goenka – On 23 February 2012 Etisalat of the Etasalat-DB

Telecom sued Shahid Balwa and Vinod Goenka, promoters of its Indian partner DB Realty for fraud and

misrepresentation.[224][225][226]

Aircel-Maxis deal controversy[edit source | editbeta]

See also: C Sivasankaran, Dayanidhi Maran, T Ananda Krishnan, and Maxis Communications

On 6 June 2011, former Aircel Chief C Sivasankaran complained to the CBI that he was not given telecom

licence and Dayanidhi Maran (the then telecom minister) forced him to sell his company Aircel to Malaysia-

based Maxis Communications group owned by T Ananda Krishnan. The licences were allegedly issued only

after the deal was struck. Sivasankaran also alleged that Maran brothers Dayanidhi and Kalanidhi got

kickbacks in the form of investments made by the Maxis group through Astro network in Sun TV

Network (owned by Maran family).[150][151][152] Dayanidhi Maran was forced to resign due to these allegations on 7

July 2011.[227]

Subsequently on 10 Oct 2011, the CBI registered a case and raided various properties owned by Marans. CBI

sources said they could not find any evidence of coercion in the sale of Aircel, but they did find substantial

evidence that Maran had favoured the takeover of the company by Maxis and deliberately delayed

Sivasankar’s files.[150][151][152]On 8 February 2012, ED registered money laundering case against Dayanidhi

Maran[187] and his brother Kalanithi Maran for allegedly receiving illegal gratification of about 5.5 billion in the

Aircel-Maxis deal.[188]

During the CBI probe, Sivasankaran told that the Maran brothers had allegedly issued life threats forcing him to

sell his 74% stake in Aircel to Maxis. He provided the CBI a list of over 10 witnesses, to prove his allegations.

In September 2012, CBI said that it has finished the investigations within India and is waiting for response of

a Letters Rogatorysent to Malaysia and a questionnaire sent to T Ananda Krishnan, after which it will file

a chargesheet.[228]

Dr Subramanian Swamy alleged that in 2006, a company controlled by then Minister of Finance P

Chidambaram’s son Karti got five per cent stake in Sivasankaran’s Aircel to get part of Rs 40 billion that

the Maxis Communications paid for 74 per cent stake in Aircel. He alleged that Mr Chidambaram withheld the

FIPB clearance to the deal till his son got the five per cent shares in Siva’s company.[229] Subsequently the

issue was raised on multiple times in Parliament of India by the opposition which demanded resignation of Mr P

Chidambaram.[230] He and the government denied all the allegations.[231] However, according to The

Pioneer and India Today reports, documents show that approval to the FDI proposal was indeed delayed about

7 months by P Chidambaram.[229][232][233]

Response to scam[edit source | editbeta]

Opposition demands Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) – As soon as the Indian media started

citing Comptroller and Auditor General of India's report which pegged the loss at 1.76 trillion (short

scale), the Indian opposition parties unanimously demanded formation of Joint parliamentary committee

(JPC) to investigate 2G scam.[234][235] However the Indian government rejected the demand of opposition.

[235] Later when the winter session of parliament began on 9 November 2010, opposition again pressed

for (JPC) but once again the demand was rejected.[235] The opposition's demand for (JPC) gained further

momentum when Comptroller and Auditor General of India's report was tabled in Parliament on 16

November 2010.[236] The opposition blocked parliament proceedings and again pressed for JPC.[237] With

Govt again rejecting the demand there was logjam in parliament.[238] Speaker of the Lok Sabha, Meira

Kumar tried to break the logjam but her efforts didn't bear any fruit.[239] Finally the winter session of

parliament concluded on 13 December 2010 . The plan was to introduce 22 new bills, take up 23 pending

bills for consideration and passing and withdraw three bills but that didn't happen because the parliament

was allowed to function for only 9 hours.[240] In February 2011, after resisting the Opposition demand for

over three months, the government finally agreed to constitute a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) to

probe the 2G spectrum allocation issue. The government announced it formally on 22 February 2011.

[241] On 24 July 2012, JPC took CBI to task for the leniency shown to PM, AG, Dayanidhi Maran and

Chidambaram and reluctance to investigate their role in 2G Spectrum scam.[242] Recently after questioning

former telecom minister Dayanidhi Maran, his brother Kalanithi and the head of Maxis Communications,

CBI alleged that Maran brothers have accrued illegal gratification of Rs 5.50 billion by purchase of Sun

Direct TV share at highly "inflated prices".[243]

Jayalalitha accuses M. Karunanidhi – In early November 2010 Jayalalithaa accused the state chief

minister M Karunanidhi of protecting A. Raja from corruption charges and called for A. Raja's resignation.

[244] By mid November A. Raja resigned.[245]

CAG issues show-cause notices – In mid November the comptroller Vinod Rai issued show-cause

notices to Unitech, S Tel, Loop Mobile, Datacom (Videocon), and Etisalat to respond to his assertion that

all of the 85 licenses granted to these companies did not have the up-front capital required at the time of

the application and were in other ways illegal.[246] Some media sources have speculated that these

companies will receive large fines but not have their licenses revoked, as they are currently providing

some consumer service.[246]

Internal appraisal after Prime Minister's criticism – In June 2011, the prime minister Manmohan

Singh criticised the CAG for commenting on policy issues. He also warned CAG "to limit the office to the

role defined in the constitution."[247] After prime minister's criticism, the CAG conducted a "rigorous internal

appraisal" and stood by its findings, also citing additional crucial events to corroborate them. The CAG

reiterated that there was "an undeniable loss to the exchequer", the calculation of which was based upon 3

estimates – 3G auctions, Swan and Unitech transactions. It also cited the Supreme Court judgement on 2

February 2012 that the actions of Mr. Raja and officers of the Department of Telecom were "wholly

arbitrary, capricious and contrary to the public interest, apart from being violative of the doctrine of

equality. The material produced for the quote showed that the Minister for C&IT wanted to favour some

companies at the cost of the public exchequer." The CAG also said that its estimation of loss of 1.76-lakh

crore was justified as the TRAI’s collation of reserve price for 2G spectrum as of May 2012 was

approximately same as the calculation in CAG report of November 2010 on 2G scam. It also highlights that

the TRAI had recommended a reserve price of 2G spectrum of Rs. 180 billion for a pan-India licence for

5 MHz spectrum which was higher than the 3G value of Rs. 167.50 billion for 5 MHz used by the CAG for

arriving at a [loss] figure of 1,760 billion. It concluded by saying that it was only examining the

"implementation of policy" and that the policy making was government's prerogative.[248]

Joint Parlimentary Commitee[edit source | editbeta]

The JPC will consist of 30 members out of which 15 will be from the UPA and 15 from the Opposition. The

Committee will have 20 members from the Lok Sabha and 10 Rajya Sabha MPs.

Among the Lok Sabha MPs who will be part of the committee, eight are from Congress and four from BJP.

Following is the list or Names of JPC Committee members who will investigate 2G scam.

Name Party

Kishore Chandra Deo Congress

Paban Singh Ghatowar Congress

Jai Prakash Agarwal Congress

Deepender Singh Hooda Congress

P. C. Chacko Congress

Manish Tewari Congress

Nirmal Singh Khatri Congress

Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury Congress

T. R. Baalu Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam

Kalyan Banerjee Trinamool Congress

Jaswant Singh BJP

Yashwant Sinha BJP

Harin Pathak BJP

Gopinath Munde BJP

Sharad Yadav Janata Dal (United)

Dara Singh Chauhan Bahujan Samaj Party

Akhilesh Yadav Samajwadi Party

Gurudas Dasgupta Communist Party of India

Arjun Charan Sethi Biju Janata Dal

M. Thambi Durai All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam

Speaker Meira Kumar will nominate one among the members as chairman of the JPC.

2G Spectrum Scam

Documents

Transcript of 2G Spectrum Scam