29 november 2008 Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands1 Case: the Bob-campaign against drink...

20
29 november 2008 Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 1 Case: the Bob-campaign against drink driving

Transcript of 29 november 2008 Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands1 Case: the Bob-campaign against drink...

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 1

Case: the Bob-campaign against drink driving

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 2

Effect of alcohol in traffic

• Alcohol directly weakens driver skills:- less attention and visual detection- longer reaction time- problem with keeping course

• Accident risk increases depending on BAC:- 0,5 promille: 1,5 times higher than sober- 0,8 promille: 2 times higher than sober- 1,3 promille: 15 times higher than sober- 1,8 promille: 50 times higher than sober

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 3

Accident risk of drink drivers at different BAC-levels

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 4

Fatal injury risk of drink drivers, for different age groups

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 5

Alcohol regulation in The Netherlands and Hungary

Netherlands• 1975: legal limit 0,5 promille BAC• 2006: 0,2 promille BAC for novice

drivers

Hungary• Legal limit: 0,0 promille BAC• Zero tolerance!

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 6

Drink driving in The Netherlands: problem analysis

• Share of drink drivers: 3,0% in 2007• Estimated alcohol-related fatalities: 12 to

25% of total (2007: 95 to 200 deaths)• Social costs: €2 billion each year• Heavy offenders >1,3 promille BAC (0,4%

of all drivers) cause 60% of alcohol-related accidents

• 2/3 of victims in weekend nights• 70% of drink drivers are male• 60% come from cafe or restaurant; 30%

from private home

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 7

Self-reported drink driving in Hungary and The Netherlands, 2005

Answer ‘never’ on question ‘How often do you drive after drinking even a small amount of alcohol?’

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 8

Policy instruments against drink driving: prevention and repression

• Education: licensing and secondary schools• Communication: Bob-campaign since 2002• Enforcement: select and random controls,

sanctions under criminal law (penalty, license suspension)

• Compulsory rehabilitation program for drivers with 1,3 to 1,8 promille BAC

• Medical examination for offenders above 1,8 promille BAC (possibility of license withdrawal)

• 2010: compulsory alcolock program for offenders with 1,3 to 2,1 promille BAC (2 years, user-pay basis, including educational program)

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 9

Communication on drink driving before 2002

• Fragmented and ineffective operation:- several concepts in use simultaneously- conflicting messages - confusion among road users- lack of improvement in attitudes and behaviour

• Waste of financial, logistic and personal capacity

• Heavy focus on risk awareness and deterrence:- shock and awe-treatment- absence of clear perspective and ‘tools’ for implementation of safe behaviour

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 10

The Bob-concept

• Originates from Belgium (since 1995)• Designated driver revitalized• Positive, sympathic approach• Focus on the moment before drinking

alcohol• Simple and easy applicable message:

- before drinking make a deal who stays sober and drives the others home - he or she is called Bob

• Freedom of choice

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 11

Bob in The Netherlands

• Belgian concept adapted to Dutch culture:

- Bob is just a responsible person, not a hero- Bob joins the party, not a loner or a loser

- Bob-rotation principle: higher acceptance• Being Bob is made a verb: slogan ‘Do you

bob or do I bob?’• 2004: integration in umbrella concept,

slogan ‘Bob.The way to get home safely’• Yearly two nationwide campaigns• Continuous activities on local level

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 12

Key success factors

• Structural cooperation: government, police, NGO’s, alcohol industry, hospitality industry

• Joint responsibility of autonomous partners• Coordinated planning of activities • One concept and message by all partners• High likeability and acceptance • Simple ‘tool’ for adoption of safe behaviour• Broad media mix on national and local level• Presence when/where people drink alcohol• Constant refreshment

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 13

Targets of the Bob-campaign

• Risk awareness on drink driving• Knowledge of the Bob-formula as tool

for safe behaviour • Positive attitude towards the Bob-

formula• Safe behaviour by making the Bob-deal

and compliance with the Bob-role

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 14

Evolution in target groups

• 2002: visitors of catering establishments (especially age group 18-35)

• 2004: people drinking alcohol at home and at private parties (especially age group 35-50)

• 2005: visitors of sport canteens• 2006: visitors of big events (sports,

music)

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 15

Bob-communication in practice

What does it look like?

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 16

Billboard highways, summer 2004

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 17

Billboard highways, summer 2005

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 18

Billboard highways, summer 2006

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 19

Billboard highways, winter 2007

29 november 2008

Road safety campaigns in The Netherlands 20

Billboard on provincial road