14 mars 2007M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study1 Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Study in FP7.
25/10/2007M. Dracos1 EURO The European Design Study for a high intensity neutrino oscillation...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of 25/10/2007M. Dracos1 EURO The European Design Study for a high intensity neutrino oscillation...
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 1
EUROThe European Design Study for a high intensity neutrino oscillation
facility (Rob Edgecock, Mats Lindroos, Marcos
Dracos)
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 2
What is an EU Design Study?
• The 27 European Union member states is in the process of creating a common Research Area with common Research Infrastructure
• The EU funding for research is organized as Frame Work programmers with different components– The FP contributes with 5% to the total national research funding in
Europe– We are presently working within the 6th FP– The Design Studies is one component in the FP and has as objective to
provide first designs for possible common research infrastructure
• The ESFRI (European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures, European roadmap for research infrastructures) committee establishes a priority list for new common infrastructure to which the EU is willing to contribute– The Design Studies is the first step in the process to qualify for
financing from the EU for the infrastructure– For the infrastructure to be constructed a member state(s) or an
intergovernmental organization must bid for it and offer an important part of the funding
• International participation is strongly encouraged
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 3
Work Program: Work Program: CapacitiesCapacities
EU call
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 4
Design Studies budgetDesign Studies budget
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 5
Objectives of EURONU DS
• The recent discovery that the neutrino changes type (or flavour) as it travels through space, a phenomenon referred to as neutrino oscillations…
• The implications are far reaching…
• Knowledge of the contribution of neutrinos in these areas needs precise measurements of the parameters governing neutrino oscillations.
• This will require a new high intensity beam-based neutrino oscillation facility in which neutrino beams are generated using new and highly challenging concepts.
• This Design Study will review all three currently accepted methods of realizing this facility (the so-called neutrino Super-Beams, Beta Beams and Neutrino Factories).
• It includes a detailed study of the key technical challenges of the accelerator facilities, of the detector options necessary to measure the neutrino oscillation parameters and a comparison of the physics reach of these facilities.
• The design study will also perform a cost assessment that, coupled with the physics performance, will permit the European research authorities to make a timely decision on the lay-out and construction of the future European neutrino oscillation facility.
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 6
Neutrino FacilitiesNeutrino Facilities
pH- linac 2.2 (3.5) GeV, 4 MW
Target
~300 MeV beam to far detector
decay tunnel
Accumulatorring + bunchcompressor
Magnetichorn capture(collector)
proton driver
hadrons
p
Protondriver
Isol target& ion source
DECAYRING
B = 5TL=6880 m
PSB
EURISOLExisting at CERN
New RFQ
SPS
PS Linac
H- linac 2.2 GeV, 4 MW
Target
Linac 2 GeV
RecirculatingLinacs 2 50 GeV
Decay ring – 50 GeV2000 m circumference
Ionizationcooling
Phase rotation
beam to far detector
Drift
Accumulatorring + bunchcompressor
Magneticcapture
beam to near detector
SPL Super-Beam
Neutrino Factory
Beta-Beam
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 7
Participants
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 8
p-driver
target
collector
front-end
accel.
stor. ring
technologies
beam
Overview
SB BB NF
13 CPV MSW…
(non-acc. ?)
LAr
Cerenkov
Emulsions
magnetized
physics
detectors
facilities
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 9
p-driver
target
collector
front-end
accel.
stor. ring
technologies
beam
Work Packages and Deliverables
Super-BeamSuper-Beam
Neutrino FactoryNeutrino Factory
Beta-BeamBeta-Beam
in order to underline synergies…
Near det.
Beam instr.
Far det.
Perform.
Comparison
DetectorsDetectors
PhysicsPhysics
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 10
Objectives of the tasks
• Management:– Lead and coordinate the DS– Comparison of the three facilities
• Super beam:– Design of target and collector– Beam characteristics for the SPL superbeam– Specifications for the proton driver
• Neutrino factory– Design of muon front end– Design of an acceleration scenario– Develop a conceptual design for proton beam
handling after the primary production target (proton beam dump)
– End-to-end simulation of the neutrino factory complex
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 11
Objectives of the tasks
• Beta-beam– Review acceleration scenario for high-Q value
isotopes– Production of beta-beam isotopes with the production
ring concept– Review decay ring design for high-Q value isotopes– Continue R&D on bunching
• Detector task– Study a Magnetized Iron Neutrino Detector– Study a Cerenkov detector – Study a near detector
• Physics task– Study physics performance– Make optimization of the different possible scenarios– Make a comparison
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 12
Effort in people (120 person years)
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 13
Organization
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 14
Organization
GOVERNING BOARDGOVERNING BOARD
1 representative of each Participant
+ Management Board, ECFA respresentative and representatives of other neutrino
activities (all ex -of f icio)1 meeting/ year
MANAGEMENT BOARDMANAGEMENT BOARD(Executive committee of Coordination Board)(Executive committee of Coordination Board)
Project Leader + 3 Members
COORDINATION BOARDCOORDINATION BOARD
Management Board+ Task Leaders
+ Coordinators of related EU activities(ex -of f icio)
2-3 Meetings / year
INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY PANELPANEL
3 Members – 1 Meeting/ year
ANNUAL PARTICIPANT ANNUAL PARTICIPANT MEETINGMEETING
1 Meeting/ year
WP Nufact
WP BetaB
WP MGT WP Detec
WP PhysWP SuperB
DI SSEMI NATI ON BOARDDI SSEMI NATI ON BOARD
3 Member s – Meet ings as r equir ed
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 15
Money
• Total cost: 14.45M€• EC request: 4.8M€• Ratio: 33%
WP (total €)
0%
5%
10%
15%
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
WP1
WP2
WP3
WP4
WP5
WP6
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 16
Time scale
• In short:– We will work for 4
years– We hope to start
beginning 2008– We will use the
last year for the comparison task
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 17
EU decision
• The proposal got a top ranking in the evaluation of the proposals
• We have been invited to negotiate for a maximum 4 MEuro EU financing
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 18
Annual meeting
•Annual meeting to gather the Neutrino physics community and report on the progress of the study
•The meeting will be combined with task meeting, management meetings and reviews
–November 2008: CERN
–November 2009: USA
–November 2010: RAL (Project review)
–November 2011: Paris
•Your are invited to participate!
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 19
Participation CNRS et CEAPartner In proposal After step (1) cuts
After all cuts - FINAL NUMBERS
Total cost (EUR) EC request (EUR) Re-imbursement rate (%) EC Request EC Request Total cost
STFC 3577864 1055086 29.49 1055086 890493 3413271
CEA 869070 286793 33.00 286793 242053 824330
CERN 2201000 738254 33.54 738254 623086 2085832
Glasgow 507930 147263 28.99 147263 124290 484957
Imperial 817789 297041 36.32 297041 250703 771451
CSIC 478169 232000 48.52 232000 195808 441977
CNRS 2559972 782372 30.56 782372 660322 2437922
CUT 425600 252800 59.40 222800 188043 360843
UDUR 296208 109349 36.92 109349 92291 279150
INFN 636000 186000 29.25 186000 156984 606984
MPG 481277 145000 30.13 145000 122380 458657
UOXF 8774 6000 68.38 6000 5064 7838
UniSofia 160000 96000 60.00 96000 81024 145024
Warwick 338486 88121 26.03 88121 74374 324739
UCL 1129000 377000 33.39 377000 318188 1070188
TOTAL 14487139 4799079 33.13 4769079 4025103 13713163
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 20
Participation CNRS et CEA
Participant no./short name
WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 Total person months
CNRS 12 (12)(IPHC)
102 (108)(IPHC)
12 (12)(LPSC)
78 (83)(LPSC+LCMI)
44 (48)(APC)
0 248 (263)
CEA 0 48 36
25/10/2007 M. Dracos 21
EndEnd