2510-gf-011193

download 2510-gf-011193

of 5

Transcript of 2510-gf-011193

  • 7/29/2019 2510-gf-011193

    1/5

    System Architecture of a Modular Direct-DC

    PV Charging Station for Plug-in Electric

    VehiclesChristopher Hamilton, Gustavo Gamboa, John Elmes, Ross Kerley, Andres Arias,

    Michael Pepper, John Shen, and Issa BatarsehSchool of Electrical and

    Computer Engineering

    University of Central Florida

    Orlando, Florida 32816

    Email: [email protected]

    Abstract Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) arean emerging technology in the market and are helping tooffset the negative effects of existing transportation methodsthat primarily rely on fossil fuel sources. As PHEVs arebeing introduced into the market, renewable energy sourcessuch as solar power are taking a larger part in theenergy sector. A need for high efficiency battery charging isrequired to decrease the amount of time it takes to chargethese cars in order for them to become a viable meansof transportation. A novel solar carport architecture isproposed that will provide a three port interface to PHEVs,solar panels and the utility grid to create a seamless powerflow between the three ports. Current battery chargersrely heavily on AC/DC conversion from the grid to thecar battery, however a direct DC/DC interface is madein this solar carport thus increasing the overall efficiency.

    This paper will prove this concept and show the improvedperformance over available battery charging schemes.

    I. INTRODUCTION

    In recent years, the improvement in battery technology

    has allowed car manufacturers to design more affordable

    plug-in electric vehicles. The wide use of electric

    vehicles can cause a significant increase in the power

    load, especially at peak hours, in local areas. Also, non-

    linear charging loads can caused high harmonics and

    poor power factor which can significantly affect the

    local utility company as well. The implementation of

    a PV charging station for plug in electric vehicles has

    been an attractive technology since it can optimize thepower consumption at peak hours. Several solar charging

    stations have been constructed in [2][4][5][6] with the

    intent to offset the load requirements at peak hours.

    However, they are based primarily on simulation and/or

    fail to compare the overall efficiency.

    This paper proposes a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle

    (PHEV) solar carport charging station concept featuring a

    multi-port power electronic interface among photovoltaic

    modules, PHEVs, and the power grid (shown in figure

    1). A unique control strategy is implemented, allowing

    efficient energy transfer while reducing the conversion

    stages between the source and load. The system is

    designed to be modular to improve flexibility and allow

    for ease of expansion. In the proposed system, a single

    modular system will provide charging for two parking

    spaces.

    Fig. 1. System overview of the proposed multi-port solar carport

    The specifications of each DC/DC converter module

    will be provided based on design criteria for the

    topologies. Preliminary experimental results will also

    be presented in this paper showing the efficiency from

    PV to car battery. These results will compare thecurrent technology of today based on a DC/AC-AC/DC

    conversion scheme with our proposed DC/DC conversion

    process. These results will prove the concept of direct

    DC/DC car battery charging.

    I I . SYSTEM OVERVIEW

    Each module consists of four strings of six PV panels.

    In this research, the rated power for each of the PV panel

    is 200W, thus making the overall power of 1.2 kW per

    978-1-4244-5226-2/10/$26.00 2010 IEEE 2510

  • 7/29/2019 2510-gf-011193

    2/5

    PV string. In normal MPPT operation, the input voltage

    the DC/DC converter will see from the panels is 330V-

    350V as they were experimentally verified later in this

    paper. However, the total open voltage can reach up to

    448V per string. Each station also consists of two 4 kW

    DC/DC converters for battery charging, one converter

    per parking space. Figure 2 illustrates a quick overviewof the proposed modular system for each charging

    station. Note the DC/DC charger for the vehicles may

    eventually be integrated within each vehicle (on-board).

    Finally, the multi-port solar charging station incorporates

    a bidirectional converter as the mediator of the module

    and the grid.

    Fig. 2. Block diagram of the proposed multi-port solar carport

    The second phase of the research will include

    the design of a bidirectional DC/AC converter. This

    bidirectional converter will provide the excess power

    from the PV arrays to the grid. This condition is met

    when the PV power is greater than then load power.

    However, if the PV panels are not providing enough

    power to charge the batteries, the control structure ofthe bidirectional DC/AC converter senses the decrease in

    bus voltage and supplies the extra power needed by the

    vehicle batteries. The proposed control algorithm for the

    multi-port solar charging system between photovoltaic

    modules, plug-in hybrid vehicles, and the power grid is

    shown in figure 2.

    III. TOPOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION

    Each converter charger and solar DC/DC converter

    implemented in this research consists of a synchronous

    buck DC/DC converter and the designed values for the

    main power components are shown in Table III.

    Component Charger Solar

    L 47H 650H

    Cin 1060F 300F

    Cout 600F 1000F

    TABLE I

    MAIN COMPONENT VALUES FOR THE CHARGER AND SOLAR

    DC/DC BUCK CONVERTER

    The equivalent DC resistance of the inductor

    for the charger DC/DC converter was measured

    to be approximately 2.64m. Similarly, the DC

    inductor resistance for the solar DC/DC converter is

    approximately 81.6m mainly because it contains 72

    turns as opposed to the charger inductor where it only

    has 10 turns around the core. The equivalent resistance ofthese two inductors under different frequencies is shown

    in Table III.

    Frequency Rcharger RsolarDC 2.64 m 81.6 m

    10kHz 16.5 m 15 m

    20kHz 4.25 m 25 m

    40kHz 130 m 54 m

    80kHz 450 m 1.5

    100kHz 600 m 2.3

    120kHz 955 m 3.2

    140kHz 1.28 4.4

    160kHz 1.64 5.6

    TABLE II

    EQUIVALENT RESISTANCE UNDER DIFFERENT UNDER DIFFERENT

    FREQUENCIES FOR THE MAIN INDUCTORS

    In order to better understand the results obtained

    during testing, it is important to know the range of

    inductance under different current conditions. Figure 3

    shows that our inductor will remain between 45H [max

    load] to 50H [no load]; where the maximum load is at

    30A per indictor.

    Fig. 3. Charger inductance under different current conditions

    Similarly, the main inductor for the solar DC/DCconverter was measured under different current

    conditions. Figure 4 shows that the inductance will vary

    from 640H [max load]-735H [no load]. Unlike the

    charger, the maximum current rating for this inductor

    was designed to be 6A.

    To reduce switching losses, Zero-Voltage Transition

    (ZVT) Pulse-Width-Modulated (PWM) is implemented.

    As explained in [3], this technique implements an

    auxiliary circuit in parallel with the main power path.

    2511

  • 7/29/2019 2510-gf-011193

    3/5

    Fig. 4. Charger inductance under different current conditions

    Several soft switching techniques are used in the industry,

    however, a comparison was made in [1] where ZVT-

    PWM appeared to be the most desirable since it

    combines advantages of both PWM and resonant soft

    switching techniques.

    In Figure 5, a generalized ZVT-PWM switching cell is

    shown. This cell includes the main power switches (S1and S2 assuming ideal case) with an auxiliary switch,

    Sr, the auxiliary diode, Dr, the resonant inductor, Lr,

    and the resonant capacitor, Cr.

    Fig. 5. ZVT-PWM implementation for the Buck DC/DC converters

    The designed values for the charger to achieve ZVT

    along with their rated values is summarized in Table III.

    Component Value Note

    Lr 3.3H Irms=60A Isat=84ACr 4.9nF 400VmaxDr 60A 600Vmax

    TABLE III

    MAIN COMPONENT VALUES FOR THE CHARGER DC/DC BUCK

    CONVERTER

    Likewise, the designed values for the solar DC/DC

    converter to achieve ZVT is summarized in Table III.

    For the final paper, these values will be optimized in

    order to increase efficiency.

    Component Value Note

    Lr 4.7H Irms=20A Isat=59A

    Cr 4.3nF 400Vmax

    Dr 60A 600Vmax

    TABLE IV

    MAIN COMPONENT VALUES FOR THE SOLAR DC/DC BUCK

    CONVERTER

    The modes of operation for ZVT are illustrated in

    Figure 6. The final paper will include a more detailed

    experimental results that confirms ZVT operation.

    Fig. 6. Seven modes for the ZVT-PWM implementation

    IV. EFFICIENCY RESULTS

    The proposed research has undergone some

    preliminary efficiency testing to test the power handling

    capability of the individual converters as well as theoverall efficiency of the solar carport system. The solar

    and charger simulations in PSPICE showed yielded 90%

    efficiency when operating without soft-switching and

    because of the power level, a soft switching technique

    was researched and selected as shown in section II.

    Simulation results with the ZVT topology yielded an

    efficiency increase of about 5% which is a suitable

    specification for the PHEV system. The results shown

    below are for the case of ZVT soft-switching.

    2512

  • 7/29/2019 2510-gf-011193

    4/5

    A. Solar Power Stage Testing

    The solar power stage showed promising results for

    initial testing and when compared with results obtained

    from the solar panels, the solar converters will be

    operating at high efficiency most of the day due to the

    power level distribution during this time.

    A grid-tied inverter measured and recorded the powerdelivered to the grid from the panels during a 7 hour

    window starting at 7:30 AM and ending at 2:30 PM.

    The results from this test are shown below in figure 7.

    Fig. 7. Power vs. Time: Power delivered to the grid during morningand mid-afternoon

    The results represent 4 strings of 1.2 kW solar panel

    units, each of which is to be controlled by a separate 1.2

    kW solar power stage operating with MPPT. The results

    for the solar power stage testing were obtained during

    closed loop operation with only an OVR controller

    regulating the output voltage so that efficiency results

    could easily be measured. These results are shown in

    figure 8.

    Fig. 8. Efficiency curve of the solar DC/DC converter operating inoutput voltage regulation

    The results shown in figure 8 were taken with the

    following: Vin = 330V

    Vout = 210V

    fsw = 50kHz

    Comparing the results of the solar power stage and the

    inverter power draw, it can easily be shown that since the

    solar converter operates above 93% efficiency at more

    than half the rated power and that the panels yield more

    than half the rated power from 8:30 AM until the end

    of the recorded data, the solar converter operates at high

    efficiency levels for most of the day. It should also be

    noted that minimal part and layout optimization has been

    done and that better results will be extracted over the next

    few months.

    B. Series Connected Power Stage Results

    Testing was also done on the efficiency from the solarpanels to the battery output, which was selected to be 72

    V based on common battery voltages in neighborhood

    electric vehicles (NEV). The output voltage in the final

    system will be selected based on the type of car that

    is plugged into the carport. The results in figure 9

    show that the solar panel-to-battery efficiency remains

    close to 90%. The efficiency test was only up to 1.2

    kW because of the rated power of the solar DC/DC

    converter, however a thermal camera showed very little

    heat dissipation on the parts and the layout and so we

    feel comfortable with the power handling capability of

    the prototype. Notice that preliminary results show that

    the proposed architecture yields a significant increasein efficiency when compared with a typical setup. In

    this research, a typical setup is defined as a DC/AC/DC

    power transfer before it gets to the vehicle battery. The

    converters are currently being optimized and the final

    paper will include a more detailed experimental results

    that can better illustrate the advantages of the proposed

    architecture.

    Fig. 9. Efficiency curve of the solar DC/DC converter cascaded withthe charger DC/DC converter (Dash line: typical setup; Solid line:proposed setup

    V. SUMMARY

    A PHEV solar carport station architecture is proposedin this paper. This architecture along wiht a unique

    control algorithm structure eliminates extra conversion

    steps which increases overall power transfer efficiency

    from the PV arrays to the vehicle battery pack. The

    control structure mentioned in section II shows how a

    modular system can be made by always monitoring the

    bus voltage. The system described allows all PHEVs

    connected to the solar charging station for plug-in electric

    vehiles to have an equal amount of power if power

    2513

  • 7/29/2019 2510-gf-011193

    5/5

    available from the charging station is limited. In addition,

    the solar DC/DC converters behave the same way by

    always evenly sharing the power distribution to the

    carport. Because the system is modular, it can easily be

    expanded thus making the station more affordable and

    efficient.

    The PV charging station where the proposed algorithmwill be implemented has been completed and it is shown

    in Figure 11. Because the solar DC/DC converters always

    have the same output, the prototype shown in Figure

    10 includes two of the 1.2 kW DC/DC converter with

    a common output (bus). This yields an overall power

    of 2.4 kW per enclosure. The final paper will include

    experimental results of the proposed system architecture

    with an optimized ZVT-PWM implememtation. Also, a

    more detailed efficiency comparison between DC/AC/DC

    charging versus our modular system using the same PV

    charging station will be discussed.

    Fig. 10. Enclosed first prototype for the solar DC/DC converter (2.4kW total power)

    Fig. 11. PHEV carport charging station where the algorithm will beimplemented

    REFERENCES

    [1] Guichao Hua and F.C. Lee. Soft-switching techniques in pwmconverters. In Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation,1993. Proceedings of the IECON 93., International Conferenceon, pages 637 643 vol.2, nov 1993.

    [2] J.G. Ingersoll and C.A. Perkins. The 2.1 kw photovoltaic electricvehicle charging station in the city of santa monica, california. In

    Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 1996., Conference Record ofthe Twenty Fifth IEEE, pages 1509 1512, may 1996.[3] M.Ld.S. Martins, J.L. Russi, and H.L. Hey. Novel design

    methodology and comparative analysis for zvt pwm converterswith resonant auxiliary circuit. Industry Applications, IEEETransactions on, 42(3):779 796, may-june 2006.

    [4] D.M. Robalino, G. Kumar, L.O. Uzoechi, U.C. Chukwu, and S.M.Mahajan. Design of a docking station for solar charged electric andfuel cell vehicles. In Clean Electrical Power, 2009 InternationalConference on, pages 655 660, june 2009.

    [5] T. Winkler, P. Komarnicki, G. Mueller, G. Heideck, M. Heuer, andZ.A. Styczynski. Electric vehicle charging stations in magdeburg.In Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 2009. VPPC 09.

    IEEE, pages 60 65, sept. 2009.[6] Zhang Yu, Minghong Zhang, and Jianning Yang. Design of

    energy management systems for mobile power station of electricvehicles. In Information Management, Innovation Managementand Industrial Engineering, 2009 International Conference on,volume 4, pages 250 253, dec. 2009.

    2514