23005250
-
Upload
waleed-el-hawarry -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of 23005250
8/3/2019 23005250
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23005250 1/8
Bottom soil quality in Tilapia ponds of different
age in Thailand
Taworn Thunjai1
. Claude E Boyd2 & Mali Boonyaratpalin3
LThailand Department of Fisheries, Kasetsart University Campus. Bangkok. Thailand
2Department of Flsheries and Allied Aquacultures. Auburn University. Auburn. AL USA
3Thailand Department of Fisheries. Kasetsart University Campus.. Bangkok.. Thailand
Correspondence: Dr C E Boyd. Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures. Auburn University. Auburn. AL 36849. USA. E.mail:
Abstract
Bottom soil samples were collected from 35 ponds in
the vicinity of Samutprakarn. Thailand. Ponds ran.
ged in age from 3 to 39 years and had been used con-
tinuously for production of tilapia. Liming materials
had been applied in large amounts. and bottom soils
of all ponds had pH above 7. low exchange acidity.
and free carbonate. Pond soils orten contained be-
tween 1% and 2% total sulphur. suggesting that they
were potential acid-sulphate soils. However. acidity
from sulphide oxidation was not expressed because
carbonate in the soil neutralized it. Concentrations
of total carbon seldom exceeded 4% and the averagefor organic carbon was 1.90%. The correlations be-
tween pond age and both total carbon and organic
carbon concentration were weak (r = 034 and 036respectively). Concentrations of nitrogen in bottom
soils did not differ with pond age and ranged from
0.1% to 0.3% with an average of 0.19%. The average
ratio of concentrations of carbon and nitrogen was
11. Acid-extractable phosphorus concentrations
averaged 217 mg kg -1. but the phosphorus adsorp-
tion capacity averaged 768 mg kg -1 suggesting that
soils still have considerable reserve capacity to ad-
sorb phosphorus. Ponds can be used annually for
semi-intensive production of tilapia. and presumably
other species. for many years witl10ut serious deteri-
oration of bottom soil quality.
Keywords: Tilapia. bottom soils. soil carbon.
liming
Introduction
Water quality in aquaculrure ponds is influenced by
the exchange of substances between soil and water.
but only a few studies have clearly demonstrated re-lationships between bottom'soil quality and fish pro-
duction in ponds (Boyd 1995), Nevertheless. many
aquaculturists believe that soil quality deteriorates
rapidly in semi-intensive and intensive aquaculture
ponds and that older ponds tend to have low pH and
high concentrations of organic matter in bottom
soils. There have been a few studies of the relation-
ship between pond age and bottom soil quality (Tuck-
er 1985: Munsiri. Boyd & Hajek 1995: Munsiri. Boyd.
Teichert-Coddington & Hajek 1996: Ritvo. Dixon.
Lawrence. Samocha. NeilL & Speed 1998:Tepe &Boyd
2002). and the results of these studies do not support
the opinion that pH declines markedly and organicmatter accumulates to high concentrations in older
ponds.
The most common practices used in pond soil
management are liming. drying of pond bottoms
between crops, and sediment removal (Wurtz 1960:
Chien 1989: Boyd 1995). Liming causes bottom soil
pH and concentrations of total alkalinity and total
hardness in pond water to increase. However. the
necessity for annual or more frequent liming. as
often done. is not supported by research findings.
Drying pond bottoms between crops can accelerate
the decomposition of organic matter and oxidizereduced substances in soil (Wurtz 1960: Boyd &
Pipoppinyo 1994). The benefit of sediment removal
on sediment quality is not well established and likely
is unnecessary unless sediment is so deep that
it causes a loss of pond volume or interferes with
pond management (steeby, Kingsbury. Tucker &
Hargreaves 2001:Tepe &Boyd 20(2).. Concentrations
of nitrogen and phosphorus increase in pond soils
over time (Masuda & Boyd 1994: Munsiri et al. 1995:
Ritvo et al. 1998). It is not known if the ratio of
8/3/2019 23005250
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23005250 2/8
Materials and methods
Ponds and management
8/3/2019 23005250
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23005250 4/8
Results and discussion
Total alkalinity and total hardness
8/3/2019 23005250
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23005250 5/8
Sediment depth
Thickness of S horizon and bulk density
Soil pH and exchange acidity
Total sulphur
Soil carbon
8/3/2019 23005250
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23005250 7/8
Nitrogen and phosphorus
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References