210/01 ELEXON Report€¦ · 210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0 Page 1 of 15 210/01 ELEXON Report...
Transcript of 210/01 ELEXON Report€¦ · 210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0 Page 1 of 15 210/01 ELEXON Report...
210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0
Page 1 of 15
210/01
ELEXON Report Meeting Name BSC Panel
Meeting Date 14 February 2013
Purpose of paper For Information
Summary The paper provides a summary of recent issues and developments in the period 11 January
to 7 February 2013.
1. Overview
1.1 This paper is provided for the information of the Panel. It presents an overview of activities and
developments within ELEXON and the balancing and settlement arrangements and summarises the business
of the Panel meeting. Detailed information on operational matters will be provided in other reports,
particularly the Trading Operations Report.
2. ELEXON News
Consultation responses
2.1 As foreshadowed in the ELEXON Report to the January Panel meeting, we have since responded to three
consultations:
DECC’s consultation on Stage 1 of the Smart Energy Code; and
Ofgem’s consultation on Electralink’s proposed expansion regarding electricity-related activities.
DECC’s Electricity Market Reform Call for Evidence
All our responses can be found on the Industry Insights section of ELEXON website.
Board Headline Reports
2.2 ELEXON Board Meetings are held monthly. Board headline reports are available on the ELEXON website:
Board Headline Reports.
3. Industry News
European Developments
3.1 The first (partial) draft of the Electricity Balancing Network Code was published by ENTSO-E on its
website on 4 January 2013. At the Ofgem/DECC EU Stakeholder Group meeting on 28 January, it was
210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0
Page 2 of 15
210/01
reported that the next version would be published in March, when there will be a 2 month consultation and
also a public workshop.
3.2 The imbalance settlement part of the draft is reported to include text on imbalance pricing, rules, imbalance
calculation and Settlement Period Duration, and roles. It was also suggested that Balancing
Mechanisms/Markets will gradually merge so that there are multiple Coordinated Balancing Areas (CBAs)
where the majority of BM products and prices are shared between neighbouring TSOs. By 2020 we may
expect one EU wide Balancing Mechanism.
3.3 It was also reported that ENTSO-E is going to publish a paper (a “Grand Design”) setting out the context of
all the European electricity Network Codes in a non-technical way together with the broader interactions with
REMIT, MiFID, Smart Grids and Transparency Regulations.
3.4 The European Transparency Regulation, which has reporting requirements similar to REMIT, but is a
separate Regulation from REMIT, is now essentially completed and is likely to enter force this summer, with
full implementation required within 18 months after that. This Regulation requires market participants (TSOs,
DSO, Interconnectors, Generators and large consumers) to provide a wide variety of data to a new central
information transparency platform (to be procured by ENTSO-E).
3.5 The Transparency Regulation potentially interacts with the BSC arrangements in a number of ways as many
of the required data items are similar to data items already collected and reported to GB parties under the
governance of the Grid Code and/or BSC and there is an existing reporting of BSC imbalance prices and Net
Imbalance Volume from BMRS to the current European reporting platform1.
3.6 We anticipate that during 2013 there will be work required (under both Grid Code and BSC governance) to
clarify the relationship between the data items in the Regulation, and those in existing GB codes. The most
efficient way to implement the Regulation in GB may be to expand the BMRS’s current role so that it
becomes a GB ‘reporting hub’, forwarding to the new platform a range of data items collected under Grid
Code and BSC governance. But of course this view would need to be assessed and tested through, for
example, a Modification process.
3.7 A Transparency Platform Expert Group has been established by ENTSO-E and John Lucas of ELEXON has
been successful in his application to join this Expert Group. John has advertised this fact to ISG and JESG
so that he can liaise with GB stakeholders (we believe he is the only GB representative on the Group). The
first meeting was held on 31 January.
4. Operational News
Technology Upgrade Project
4.1 A technology upgrade project, introducing new versions of the Oracle and Unix software on which the BSC
Central Systems software run, was successfully implemented on 21 January 2013. This means that the BSC
1 Since the implementation of CP1246 (‘A New Interface from BMRS to the ETSOVista Reporting System’) in
November 2008
210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0
Page 3 of 15
210/01
Central Systems are using fully up to date technology and benefit from premium support which allows any
problems to be resolved quickly, efficiently and effectively.
Warm Homes
4.2 DECC has notified some proposed amendments to the Warm Homes Discount (Reconciliation) Regulations.
The proposed amendments mainly address minor typographical inconsistencies. However, one change
impacts the treatment and redistribution of interest calculations arising from “make-right” payments (this
issue was identified during our system testing in 2011). This particular amendment brings the Regulations
into line with our Reconciliation Systems so there is no impact on our systems and processes. The
amendments are expecting to be laid in February and come into force on the 1st April 2013.
More frequent updates of Wind Forecast data
4.3 From Thursday 28 February 2013 the forecast of wind power published on the Balancing Mechanism
Reporting Service (BMRS) will be updated four times per day (at approximately 3am, 9am, 3pm and 9pm)
rather than once a day. National Grid is providing these more frequent forecasts to help parties to balance
their positions.
4.4 If you currently use the BMRS Wind forecast data on the Electricity Data Summary Page, you will notice
more frequent updates. You will also notice that the forecast data for day D+2 will be available much earlier
in the day. If you receive wind forecast data from BMRS via TIBCO you will start to receive four messages a
day rather than one. The format and structure of the messages will not change.
February 2013 Release of BSC Systems
4.5 The February 2013 Release of BSC Systems will deliver new functionality to the Energy Contract Volume
Aggregation Agent (ECVAA) Web Service to allow Notification Agents to submit up to 50 Notifications to
ECVAA in a single file for CP1373.
4.6 An updated version of our guide on how to create and submit these “Bulk Upload” files is available on the
February 13 Release page of the ELEXON website.
4.7 There will be a Participant Testing environment for CP1373 available on 11-12 February 2013. If you would
like to take part in Participant Testing of CP1373, please email us at [email protected]. If you have
any questions on the February 2013 Release of BSC Systems, please contact Colin Berry on 020 7380 4112.
5. Summaries of Panel Business – Tabled
Report from the Imbalance Settlement Group (ISG)
5.1 At its meeting on 22 January 2013 the ISG considered two decision papers. Key decisions included
considering one Metering Dispensation and the Proposed ETLMO Values for the 2013 BSC Year.
5.2 Panel paper 210/01a contains a full report of the ISG meeting.
210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0
Page 4 of 15
210/01
Report from the Supplier Volume Allocation Group (SVG)
5.3 At its meeting on 5 February 2013, the SVG considered seven decision papers. Key decisions included one
CP, UMSUG & PEG Recommendations and Non Half Hourly Interoperability.
5.4 Further information can be found in the SVG Panel report 210/01b.
Report from the Performance Assurance Board (PAB)
5.5 At its meeting on 31 January 2013, the PAB considered seven decision papers. In addition to its usual
business, it considered two Settlement Risk Reports and Assuring Code of Practice 1, 2 and 3 Metering
Systems Paper.
5.6 Further information can be found in the PAB Panel report 210/01c.
Report from the Trading Disputes Committee (TDC)
The table below summarises the TDC’s decision on PFSRs for the stated settlement Days, indicating whether
PFSRs were authorised or not.
GSP Group November 2010
Eastern Authorised
East Midlands Authorised
London Authorised
Merseyside & North
Wales Authorised
Midlands Authorised
Northern Authorised
North Western Authorised
Southern Not in process
South Eastern Authorised
South Wales Authorised
South Western Authorised
Yorkshire Authorised
South Scotland Not in process
North Scotland Not in process
5.7 Panel paper 210/01d contains a full report of the TDC meeting.
Report from the Joint European Standing Group (JESG)
5.8 The JESG held its meeting on 15 January 2013. Further information can be found at nationalgrid.co.uk.
210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0
Page 5 of 15
210/01
5.9 Panel paper 210/01e contains a full report of the JESG meeting.
6. Information Relating to Other Industry Codes
6.1 Table 1 includes the dates of most recent previous and future meetings of electricity code panels.
Table 1 – Previous and forthcoming code panel meetings
Panel/committee Meeting date (previous
meeting)
Meeting date (forthcoming
meeting)
DCUSA (Distribution Connection and Use
of System Agreement) Panel
16 January 20 February
CUSC (Connection and Use of System
Code) Modifications Panel
25 January 22 February
STC (System Operator-Transmission
Owner Code) Committee
30 January 27 February
GCRP (Grid Code Review Panel) 16 January 20 March
MDB (Master Registration Agreement
(MRA) Development Board)
31 January 28 February
6.2 We’re continuing our involvement in various workgroups under the DCUSA, MRA, CUSC and Grid Code, and
we’ll continue to update you on the key decisions and impacts.
Peter Haigh
ELEXON Chief Executive
List of Appendices:
Appendix 1 – Smart Update
Appendix 2 – ELEXON Monthly KPIs
List of Attachments:
Attachment A – 210/01a: Report from ISG
Attachment B – 210/01b: Report from SVG
Attachment C – 210/01c: Report from PAB
Attachment D – 210/01d: Report from TDC
Attachment E – 210/01e: Report from JESG
210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0
Page 6 of 15
210/01
7. Smart Metering Implementation Programme
Active Consultations
There are currently no active smart metering consultations.
DECC Publications
7.1 DECC has issued a partial response to the second version of the Smart Metering Equipment Technical Specifications (SMETS). This version has now been notified to the European Commission. A full response is
due at the end of March.
Profiling and Settlement Review
- We are currently progressing through a series of changes to the BSC to support Smart
metering: changes to accommodate smart metering technical details will be presented to the SVG in March.
- We are investigating profile accuracy and undertaking analysis of EDRP meter data provided
by one BSC Party. We are also looking at the barriers for elective half hourly settlement, including agent issues, Code of Practice metering differences and change of Measurement
Class. The next PSRG is scheduled for early March (date tbc).
Administration of the Smart Energy Code
- Following the issue of an OJEU notice on 24 January, DECC issued a Pre-Qualification
Questionnaire for the Smart Energy Code Administrator and Secretariat Services on 4 February. DECC is undertaking this procurement on behalf of the future Smart Energy Code
Panel which will ultimately contract with the successful supplier through the Smart Energy Code Company (SECCo).
- A three stage process is to be followed, comprising:
Pre-Qualification
Invitation to Tender
Preferred Bidder
- PQQ responses need to be made by noon on Friday 8 March, with a view to making the
appointment in late July 2013. The contract length is four years with the option of two one
year extensions. The contract value is estimated to be between £6 million and £15 million.
210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0
Page 7 of 15
210/01
- The Administration role encompasses:
Configuration control of the Code and supporting documentation
Modification of the SEC at the request of Parties, government or Ofgem
Accession of Parties to the SEC
The provision of advice and support to prospective SEC Parties
Suspension, expulsion and withdrawal procedures for Parties
Dispute resolution between Parties
Entry of service users to the DCC
Reporting
- The Secretariat role encompasses:
Acting as clerk to the SEC Panel
Scheduling SEC Panel meetings and sub-committee, working group and other meetings
Arranging meeting facilities
Recording Panel decisions
Administering the election of Panel members
The DCC Licence Award Process
- Responses to the DCC Invitation to Apply were submitted by 21 January. DECC are currently
evaluating these with the intention of entering Dialogue and Negotiation in mid-February. The overall timetable for appointing the DCC remains on target.
8. Smarter Markets
8.1 ELEXON submitted the Panel’s Settlement Reform report to Ofgem’s Smarter Markets team at the end of December. We await Ofgem’s conclusions which are expected in March. In anticipation of being asked to
review the settlement aspects we will shortly commence preparatory work on the Terms of Reference for a Settlement Reform Review Group, and identifying backfill needs for ELEXON staff.
8.2 Ofgem invited ELEXON to send representation to the Smarter Markets Co-ordination Group (SMCG). The
group met briefly at the end of January. The SMCG is comprised of representatives of energy Suppliers, Ofgem, DECC, gas and electricity network operators, consumer groups and industry central bodies. The
SMCG will meet three or four times a year to discuss the progress of the Smarter Markets work and provide
210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0
Page 8 of 15
210/01
input into Ofgem. Attendees at the meeting confirmed their commitment to the Smarter Markets work. Ofgem thanked the BSC Panel and ELEXON for their work to date in supporting the Settlement Reform
workstream.
8.3 Ofgem confirmed the next steps in relation to the four Smarter Markets workstreams are as follows:
Electricity Settlement Reform – a decisions in March regarding to who will progress the work (BSC
Panel or Ofgem);
Demand Side Response – a consultation in March examining which policy questions need to be
addressed;
Change of Supplier – a series of industry workshops from May to October prior to a consultation in
early 2014;
Consumer Protection – a stakeholder workshop was held on 31 January. Ofgem will be consulting on
a proposed 3-5 year programme to evaluate whether consumer protections need amending alongside the rollout of smart.
- DECC confirmed that the Smarter Markets work should take responsibility for overseeing the transition of the meter registration responsibilities from existing participants to the DCC later
this decade.
9. Smart Grids
- We continue to provide support to discussions on future Smart Grid arrangements.
- We have scoped a short piece of research targeted on understanding the potential for local balancing and how the BSC might need to evolve. As part of our research we intend to explore
how demand for these services may grow and are in discussions with various external bodies
that could support this aspect and thereby complement our knowledge of settlement and markets.
10. Smart Budget
Released Funds Spend year to date Forecast
(to end of 2012-13)
Smart Metering £ 172k £ 103k £ 144k
Smarter Markets & Smart Grids £ 128k £ 93k £ 186k
- During December 2012 we incurred expenditure for:
Back fill for the operational resources who are supporting the SMIP and addressing how we evolve the
210/01 – ELEXON Report v1.0
Page 9 of 15
210/01
settlement arrangements; and
Membership of smart grid groups.
We have continued the approach practiced during 2011- 12 of using internal resources to limit our external
spend and have employed established controls and processes to authorise and monitor all expenditure.
- We have carried out a full review of forecast expenditure and have revised the full year
forecast downwards to £330k (from £365k last month). This forecast includes back fill for operational resources, membership of Smart Grid groups, attendance at conferences and
external meetings and budget for the Local Balancing Community Energy project described
above.
- We continue to monitor spend against the £300k that was released for the period April to
September and therefore no additional funds have been requested. We will continue to re-forecast our expenditure monthly and review against released funds.
ELEXON Key Performance Indicators December 2012
Service Quality/Processes
Value of Imbalance Settlement
These graphs are for information only to put ELEXON’s role in context. The graph
below is also reported in the Trading Operations Report.
£0
£10,000
£20,000
£30,000
£40,000
£50,000
£60,000
£70,000
£80,000
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
Dec-
11
Jan-1
2
Feb-1
2
Mar-
12
Apr-
12
May-1
2
Jun-1
2
Jul-12
Aug-1
2
Sep-1
2
Oct
-12
Nov-1
2
£ '0
00
s
MW
h (
mil
lio
ns)
Imbalance Volume and Cashflow
Imb Vol (MWh) Total Imbalance Cashflow (£)
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
05
101520253035
De
c-1
1
Jan
-12
Feb
-12
Mar
-12
Ap
r-1
2
May
-12
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
No
v-1
2
Pe
rce
nta
ge
MW
h (
mill
ion
s)
Total Demand and Imbalance Percentage
Total Demand (MWh) Imb Vol as % of Total Demand
ELEXON Key Performance Indicators December 2012
Service Quality/Processes
BSC Systems Availability
During December 2012 there were no service breaches affecting the
BSC system availability.
BSC Systems Performance
During December 2012 there were no service breaches affecting the
BSC Systems Performance.
95.00%
96.00%
97.00%
98.00%
99.00%
100.00%
BSC Systems Availability 2011/12
Real Time Systems Non Real Time
95.00%
96.00%
97.00%
98.00%
99.00%
100.00%
BSC Systems Performance 2011/12
Real Time Non Real Time
ELEXON Key Performance Indicators December 2012
Service Quality/Processes
Trading Disputes
Trading Disputes can be raised by any BSC Party, including ELEXON, and
are assessed by the Trading Disputes Committee (TDC).
Eleven new disputes were opened and 12 were closed in December.
Disputes by Raising Party Type
This KPI shows all Disputes raised over the last 12 months by the type of
participant who raised the Dispute.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Jan
-12
Feb
-12
Mar
-12
Ap
r-1
2
May
-12
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
No
v-1
2
De
c-1
2
Trading Disputes 2011/12
Open Disputes Disputes Raised Disputes Closed ELEXON Implicated
Supplier Distibutor Generator ELEXON Trading Party(General)
Trading Party(Non
Physical)
TransmissionCompany
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Disputes by Raising Party Jan12 - Dec12
ELEXON Key Performance Indicators December 2012
Service Quality/Processes
Cost of Processing Disputes
Within the Metering and Disputes team there are two dedicated resources
dealing with Trading Disputes with, going forward, some flexibility for
others to help out.
The costs for December 2012 represent 27 man days of dedicated
resource. There is an additional 2 man days covering the administration
around the monthly TDC meeting. A total of 29 man days expended for
December. Using a day rate of £500 gives a monthly cost of £14,500.
The cumulate cost KPI has been replaced (going forward from March
2012) with the cumulative annual cost.
Panel & Panel Committee Decisions
For the month of December all 104 decisions submitted
to the Panel and its committees were made.
£0
£50
£100
£150
£200
£250
£0
£10,000
£20,000
£30,000
£40,000
Cu
mu
lati
ve A
nn
ual
Co
st '0
00
s
Mo
nth
ly C
ost
Cost of Disputes 2011/12
Monthly Cost of Disputes Cumulative Annual Cost of Disputes
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
No
. De
cisi
on
s
Panel & Panel Committee Decisions
Decisions Made Decisions Deferred %age decisions made
ELEXON Key Performance Indicators December 2012
Staff Capability & Financial
ELEXON Customer Survey
This graph has been updated to include the 2012 Customer
Survey. ELEXON’s scores for 2012 are overall 7.8
(unchanged), average service satisfaction 7.7 (-0.1), and
keeping costs down 6.6 (+0.1).
Current Year Spend against Budget compared with
2011/12
The budget under spend for the financial year at the end of
December is 11.1%. The operational under-spend is 7.8%,
demand led underspend is 40.5%, and contracted costs are
7.3% below budget. Market Development is 25.0% and
Governance & Vires costs is 33.3% below budget.
Note: Underspend is now reported as a percentage of the
types of spend rather than as a percentage against total
budget.
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
ELEXON Customer Survey
Keeping Costs Down Average Service Satisfaction Overall Customer Rating
-20.00%
-15.00%
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
Percentage (Under)/Over Spend vs Budget
2012/13 2011/12 Operational 2012/13 Operational 2011/12
ELEXON Key Performance Indicators December 2012
Service Quality /Processes
Value of Imbalance Settlement
These graphs are for information only to put ELEXON’s role in context. The
graph below is also reported in the Trading Operations Report.
£0
£10,000
£20,000£30,000£40,000
£50,000£60,000£70,000£80,000
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
Jan
-12
Feb
-12
Mar
-12
Ap
r-1
2
May
-12
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
No
v-1
2
De
c-1
2
£ '0
00
s
MW
h (
mill
ion
s)
Imbalance Volume and Cashflow
Imb Vol (MWh) Total Imbalance Cashflow (£)
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
05
101520253035
Jan
-12
Feb
-12
Mar
-12
Ap
r-1
2
May
-12
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
No
v-1
2
De
c-1
2
Pe
rce
nta
ge
MW
h (
mill
ion
s)Total Demand and Imbalance Percentage
Total Demand (MWh) Imb Vol as % of Total Demand