2019-20 Campus Improvement Plan · 2019/10/9 · • Campus instructional leaders use normed tools...
Transcript of 2019-20 Campus Improvement Plan · 2019/10/9 · • Campus instructional leaders use normed tools...
Austin Independent School District 1 of 18 10/9/19
2019-20 Campus Improvement Plan
Including Zone Innovation Plan and Targeted Improvement Plan
Once published, a living draft of this plan can be found on the campus’ school page at www.austinisd.org/schools.
Austin Independent School District 2 of 18 10/9/19
Barrington Elementary Campus Improvement Plan 2019-2020
Assurances and Theory of Action DCSI I, the District Coordinator of School Improvement, attest that I will provide or facilitate
the provision of all the necessary district-level commitments and support mechanisms to ensure the successful implementation of the Targeted Improvement Plan for this campus. I understand I am responsible for the implementation of all intervention requirements. If I am the principal supervisor, I understand I am responsible for ensuring the principal carries out the plan elements as indicated herein.
Emily Bush
Principal Supervisor (Only necessary if the DCSI is NOT the Principal supervisor)
I, as supervisor of the principal for this campus, attest that I will coordinate with the DCSI to provide or facilitate the provision of all the necessary district-level commitments and support mechanisms to ensure the principal I supervise can achieve successful implementation of the Targeted Improvement Plan for this campus. I understand I am responsible for ensuring the principal carries out the plan elements as indicated herein.
Emily Bush
Principal I, as principal for this campus, attest that I will coordinate with the DCSI (and my supervisor, if they are not the same person) to use the district-provided commitments and support mechanisms to ensure the successful implementation of the Targeted Improvement Plan for this campus. I agree to carry out the plan elements as indicated herein.
Gilma Sanchez
Public Meeting Date 09/17/19
Board Approval Date
District Commitments Theory of Action
If the principal supervisor provides support and coaching to the campus principal in the following areas: Development of instructional leadership; Creating systems that ensure leaders are able to observe instruction and provide meaningful feedback to teachers in a timely manner; Thoughtful lesson planning and lesson delivery that is aligned to the standards and consistently implemented across the campus; Reflection for all stakeholders regarding student learning Then principal capacity, teacher capacity and student learning outcomes will improve.
Austin Independent School District 3 of 18 10/9/19
Barrington Elementary Campus Improvement Plan 2019-2020
Student Data
% of Students at Meets Grade Level % of Students at Meets Grade
Level on STAAR or Other Assessment
Cycle 1 (Sept-Nov) Cycle 2 (Dec-Feb) Cycle 3 (March-May) Summative Grade level
Subject tested
Data Source Goal Actual Data
Source Goal Actual Data Source Goal Actual Data
Source Goal Actual
3 Reading Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students > =25, ELs>=23
Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th >=35, ELs>=26
Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th =All Students >= 40, ELs>=29
STAAR Avg. 3rd-5th =All Students >= 44, ELs>=33
3 Math Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students > = 30 ELs> =25
Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th =All Students >= 35,ELs> =30
Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students >= 40,ELs>=35
STAAR Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students >= 46, ELs>=40
4 Reading Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students > =25, ELs>=23
Avg. 3rd-5th= All Students > =25, ELs>=23
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students > =25, ELs>=23
STAAR Avg. 3rd-5th =All Students >= 44, ELs>=33
4 Writing Benchmark
4 Math Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students > = 30 ELs> =25
Avg. 3rd-5th =All Students >=
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students >=
STAAR Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students >= 46, ELs>=40
Austin Independent School District 4 of 18 10/9/19
Student Data
% of Students at Meets Grade Level % of Students at Meets Grade
Level on STAAR or Other Assessment
Cycle 1 (Sept-Nov) Cycle 2 (Dec-Feb) Cycle 3 (March-May) Summative Grade level
Subject tested
Data Source Goal Actual Data
Source Goal Actual Data Source Goal Actual Data
Source Goal Actual
35,ELs> =30
40,ELs>=35
5 Reading Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students > =25, ELs>=23
Avg. 3rd-5th= All Students > =25, ELs>=23
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students > =25, ELs>=23
STAAR Avg. 3rd-5th =All Students >= 44, ELs>=33
5 Math Benchmark
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students > = 30 ELs> =25
Avg. 3rd-5th =All Students >= 35,ELs> =30
Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students >= 40,ELs>=35
STAAR Avg. 3rd-5th = All Students >= 46, ELs>=40
5 Science Benchmark
Austin Independent School District 5 of 18 10/9/19
Barrington Elementary Campus Improvement Plan 2019-2020
X This Focus Area has been self-selected, through data analysis and root cause analysis, as a priority area for the 2019-20 school year.
Rationale for Selecting this Effective Schools Framework Lever Through a survey of staff, and a comprehensive needs assessment, teachers identified teacher capacity-building as a need on campus.
Lever 2: Effective, Well-Supported Teachers
Comprehensive Needs Assessment*
Highest Priority Data Point Data Source 2017-18
Data 2018-19
Goal 2018-19 Actual
2018-19 Goal Status
2019-20 Goal
2019-20 Actual
2019-20 Goal Status
% of Highly Effective and Distinguished teachers-------
PPft N/A
% of Highly Effective and Distinguished teachers who are retained at the campus-------
PPfT and retention data
78.9 >75 95.2 Goal Met >75
Teachers feel comfortable raising issues and concerns that are important to them. -------
Staff Survey 53 -- 82 N/A >=85
Teachers receive feedback that can help them improve teaching. -------
Staff Survey 64 -- 81 N/A >=85
There is an atmosphere of mutual trust and respect. -------
Staff Survey 59 -- 86 N/A >=89
Professional development enhances teachers’ abilities to improve student learning. -------
Staff Survey 97 -- 94 N/A >=97
Average Years Experience of Teachers------- 2017-18 TAPR 1617: 7y -- 1718: 7.6y N/A report only
% Beginning Teachers------- 2017-18 TAPR 1617: 15.9 -- 1718: 5.5 N/A report only
% Teachers with 1-5 Years Experience------- 2017-18 TAPR 1617: 46.5 -- 1718: 58 N/A report only
% Teachers with 6-10 Years Experience------- 2017-18 TAPR 1617: 18.1 -- 1718: 12.3 N/A report only
% Teachers with 11-20 Years Experience------- 2017-18 TAPR 1617: 10.8 -- 1718: 17.1 N/A report only
% Teachers with over 20 Years Experience------- 2017-18 TAPR 1617: 8.6 -- 1718: 7 N/A report only
X TELL survey sample questions TELL Survey N/A >=91
Artifacts Reviewed: Checkmarks indicate systems/processes that are not yet fully implemented on the campus.
Austin Independent School District 6 of 18 10/9/19
Plan for ongoing and proactive recruitment of high-quality candidates
X Plan for training teacher leaders in adult learning facilitation and team dynamics
X Tool for conducting observations and tracking progress, including walkthrough form aligned to the Effective Schools Framework
Staff climate surveys with questions, results, and response plans
Teacher recruitment materials and induction schedules
X Strategic plan for teacher placements with rationale provided
X Observation schedule based on teacher needs and student assessment results
X List of preferred substitutes
Hiring practices that align with the school’s vision, mission, values, and goals
Articulated personalized strategies for retaining staff
Structured follow up observation expectations and timeline
X Preferred substitute recruitment and retention plan
Clear selection criteria, protocols, hiring and induction processes for teachers and teacher leadership
Staff selection tools (rubrics, questions, data analysis tasks)
X Structured observation debrief process and timeline
Teacher retention data differentiated by performance
Data Analysis
Strengths, increases, and gaps closed (by grade levels, subjects, student groups, or languages): ISIP in Primary showed an increase in 1st grade (52-61% at Tier 1); All items in the TELL survey increased;ELs met their academic achievement target. in reading; Very close to making target on TELPAS (5 percentage points away from target) Weaknesses, decreases, or existing gaps (by grade levels, subjects, student groups, or languages): Science performance overall All student group F in each domain of STAAR Accountability
Root Cause
Causal factors of areas of strength: ISIP - Weekly feedback and monitoring (individualized feedback) and interventions in iStation used ELs were able to take ISIP in English and Spanish and both languages were monitored TELL - Principal referenced the TELL survey in each weekly message and all meetings with staff; She clearly tied actions to measures on the TELL Survey Causal factors of areas of weakness that can be addressed by strategies in this improvement plan: Lack of training Unfamiliar with the standards
Austin Independent School District 7 of 18 10/9/19
Insufficient time to collaborate with peers Not enough time to plan during the day 2nd grade teacher resignation at MoY; 3rd grade teacher resignation (2); 3rd-5th teachers lacked subject knowledge and were self-contained for first time Students moved too quickly into English instruction
Effective, Well-Supported Teachers Strategies
startcollapse
Essential Action 2.1: Recruit, select, assign, induct, and retain a full staff of highly qualified educators. • The campus implements ongoing and proactive recruitment strategies that include many sources for high-quality candidates. (ESF_PL2_EA1a_IMP)
Action Steps Develop and document a plan with multiple strategies for recruiting teachers.
Responsible Party
Leadership Team
Evidence of Implementation
The document regarding recruitment of teachers;
Funding Source
N/A
Timeline for Completion
September
Evidence Collection
Date
November 2019 February 2020 May 2020
Implementation Status
Necessary Adjustments/
Next Steps
Strategy #2 • Clear selection criteria, protocols, hiring and induction processes are in place and align with the school’s vision, mission, values, and goals.
(ESF_PL2_EA1b_IMP)
Codify clear selection criteria, protocols and induction processes that align to Barrington's vision and mission
Leadership Team
Criteria protocols and induction processes
N/A September November 2019 February 2020 May 2020
Strategy #3 • Campus leaders implement targeted and personalized strategies to support and retain staff, particularly high-performing staff. (ESF_PL2_EA1c_IMP)
Austin Independent School District 8 of 18 10/9/19
Action Steps Revise the campus tool for coaching for conducting observations
Responsible Party
Administration
Evidence of Implementation
Walk-through form
Funding Source
N/A
Timeline for Completion
September
Evidence Collection
Date
September 30
Implementation Status
Necessary Adjustments/
Next Steps
3rd-5th grade teachers receive training in Formative Assessment
Trained Teachers; Administration
PD agenda and sign-in sheet for Formative Assessment training given to 3rd-5th grade teachers
N/A September November 2019 February 2020 May 2020
Strategy #4 • Teacher placements are strategic based on student need and teacher strengths. (ESF_PL2_EA1d_IMP)
Action Steps Determine teacher placements strategically based on student data and teacher strengths and years of experience
Responsible Party
Administration; Campus coaches
Evidence of Implementation
Master Schedule planning agenda; Staff roster (with certifications)
Funding Source
N/A
Timeline for Completion
August
Evidence Collection
Date
August 30
Implementation Status
Necessary Adjustments/
Next Steps
startcollapse
Essential Action 2.2: Build teacher capacity through observation and feedback cycles • Campus instructional leaders use normed tools and processes to conduct observations, capture trends, and track progress over time. (ESF_PL2_EA2a_INV)
Action Steps
Responsible Party
Evidence of Implementation
Funding Source
Timeline for Completion
Evidence Collection
Date
Implementation Status
Necessary Adjustments/
Next Steps
Austin Independent School District 9 of 18 10/9/19
A coaching framework, which includes observation and feedback procedures and timelines, and provide training to all coaches and teachers. Monitor instruction to understand the impact of the coaching framework.
Administration; Campus coaches
PD Sign-In; Coaching Framework Document; Coaching tracker; Walk-through form (from Coach Goal Sheet)
N/A
August-May November 2019 February 2020 May 2020
Progress Monitoring Cycle 1 (8/20-11/22) Cycle 2 (12/2-2/28) Cycle 3 (3/2-5/29) Cycle 4 (6/1-8/31)
Process Goal If teachers will receive training on the coaching framework, then teachers will deliver rigorous lessons as evidence by the content of the lesson plans and observations.
Teachers will receive professional development in the implementation of AVID (3rd-5th), and Formative Assessment.
Teachers will reflect on the implementation of AVID, Formative Assessment and the coaching framework. Identify the teachers in need of support via classroom observations and feedback cycles.
Student Performance Goal Average of Campus Climate Survey Question % agree at or above: 81 QUESTIONS FOR CAMPUS-BASED SURVEY: 1. Teachers are held to high professional standards for delivering instruction. 2. Teachers receive feedback that can help them improve teaching 3. The school leadership consistently supports teachers 4. Teachers at my school are assigned classes that maximize their likelihood of success with students 5. Professional development is differentiated to meet the needs of individual teachers.
TELL Survey Sample Average Climate Survey % agree at or above: 84 QUESTIONS FOR CAMPUS-BASED SURVEY: 1. Teachers are held to high professional standards for delivering instruction. 2. Teachers receive feedback that can help them improve teaching 3. The school leadership consistently supports teachers 4. Teachers at my school are assigned classes that maximize their likelihood of success with students 5. Professional development is differentiated to meet the needs of individual teachers.
Average of TELL Survey Question Sample % agree at or above: 91 QUESTIONS FOR CAMPUS-BASED SURVEY: 1. Teachers are held to high professional standards for delivering instruction. 2. Teachers receive feedback that can help them improve teaching 3. The school leadership consistently supports teachers 4. Teachers at my school are assigned classes that maximize their likelihood of success with students 5. Professional development is differentiated to meet the needs of individual teachers.
Austin Independent School District 10 of 18 10/9/19
Student Performance Actual Results
Barriers to Address this Cycle Quality of PLC Planning; Fidelity to coaching and classroom observation schedule
Fidelity to coaching, observation and feedback cycle
Fidelity to coaching, observation and feedback cycle
Fidelity to coaching, observation and feedback cycle
District Actions for this Cycle If the DCSI regularly visits classrooms and acts as a thought-partner with the campus principal in relation to quality PLC/teacher planning , the quality of lessons and the quality and frequency of classroom observation, feedback and coaching then consistent, rigorous learning will expand to more classrooms.
If the DCSI regularly visits classrooms and acts as a thought-partner with the campus principal in relation to quality PLC/teacher planning , the quality of lessons and the quality and frequency of classroom observation, feedback and coaching then consistent, rigorous learning will expand to more classrooms.
If the DCSI regularly visits classrooms and acts as a thought-partner with the campus principal in relation to quality PLC/teacher planning , the quality of lessons and the quality and frequency of classroom observation, feedback and coaching then consistent, rigorous learning will expand to more classrooms.
If the DCSI regularly visits classrooms and acts as a thought-partner with the campus principal in relation to quality PLC/teacher planning , the quality of lessons and the quality and frequency of classroom observation, feedback and coaching then consistent, rigorous learning will expand to more classrooms.
Progress Monitoring Notes Did you achieve your 90-day outcome? Why or why not? If teachers will receive training on the coaching framework, then teachers will deliver rigorous lessons as evidence by the content of the lesson plans and observations. Did you achieve your student performance goals listed above and on the Student Data page? Review the necessary adjustments/next steps notes for each action step. Which action steps from this cycle will you continue working on in the next cycle? What new milestones do you need to add to the next cycle?
Did you achieve your 90-day outcome? Why or why not? *Teachers will integrate AVID, and Formative Assessment in the lessons. * Evidence in lesson plans and classroom observations. Did you achieve your student performance goals listed above and on the Student Data page? Review the necessary adjustments/next steps notes for each action step. Which action steps from this cycle will you continue working on in the next cycle? What new milestones do you need to add to the next cycle?
Did you achieve your 90-day outcome? Why or why not? Did you achieve your student performance goals listed above and on the Student Data page? Review the necessary adjustments/next steps notes for each action step. Which action steps from this cycle will you continue working on in the next cycle? What new milestones do you need to add to the next cycle?
Did you achieve your 90-day outcome? Why or why not? Did you achieve your student performance goals listed above and on the Student Data page? Review the necessary adjustments/next steps notes for each action step. Which action steps from this cycle will you continue working on in the next cycle? What new milestones do you need to add to the next cycle?
Austin Independent School District 11 of 18 10/9/19
Austin Independent School District 12 of 18 10/9/19
Barrington Elementary Campus Improvement Plan 2019-2020
X This Focus Area has been self-selected, through data analysis and root cause analysis, as a priority area for the 2019-20 school year.
Rationale for Selecting this Effective Schools Framework Lever Data in literacy shows that a high number of students are reading below grade level. Currently, in 3rd grade, 27% of students read at a level that is more than one grade level below 3rd grade. During a comprehensive needs assessment, stakeholders identified a need for support in teaching for effective literacy and
planning for effective literacy instruction. Levers 4 & 5: High-Quality Curriculum and Effective Instruction
Comprehensive Needs Assessment*
Highest Priority Data Point Data Source 2017-18
Data 2018-19
Goal 2018-19 Actual
2018-19 Goal Status
2019-20 Goal
2019-20 Actual
2019-20 Goal Status
% of KG students considered Kindergarten Ready according to Texas Kindergarten Entry Assessment results for students who attended Pre-K in AISD-------
TX-KEA BOY 70 77 81 Goal Met 82
% of grade 1-2 students reading on or above grade level-------
ISIP/ISIP Español EOY
AA: 67, Hisp: 65, ECD: 63
AA: 69, Hisp: 66, ECD: 64
AA: 45, Hisp: 69, ECD: 66
Progress Made AA: 71, Hisp: 68, ECD: 66
% of students meeting their individualized Dyslexia/ reading progress measures as defined in their intervention plans-------
Dyslexia & Literacy/biliterac
y Dept.
-- baseline TBD N/A TBD
% of English Learners at Advanced High or made one year of Composite Progress-------
TELPAS 53 >=36 31 Goal Not Met >=36
% of students in grade 5 who demonstrate proficiency on a problem-based learning activity-------
TEAMS 78 >=90 98 Goal Met >=90
X Domain 3 Academic Achievement % of targets met (Reading and Math) -------
TEA data download
Rdg: 1/7, Mth: 6/7
Rdg: 1/7, Mth: 1/7
Goal Not Met Reading AS: 44, ELs: 33; Math AS: 46, ELs: 40
Domain 3 Growth % of targets met (Reading and Math) -------
TEA data download
Rdg: 5/5, Mth: 7/7
Rdg: 2/5, Mth: 0/5
Goal Not Met Rdg: 4/5, Mth: 3/5
% of staff routinely using WICOR strategies------- AVID team
% of AVID classrooms with a decrease in transition time since start of the school year-------
AVID team
% of AVID classrooms with an increase in student time-on-task since the start of the school year-------
AVID team
Austin Independent School District 13 of 18 10/9/19
ISIP % On or Above GL
All Students - English All Students - Spanish
All Students - Combined English and
Spanish African American Hispanic ECD
Grade Level 17-18 EOY 18-19 EOY 17-18 EOY
18-19 EOY 17-18 EOY 18-19 EOY 17-18 EOY 18-19 EOY 17-18 EOY 18-19 EOY 17-18 EOY 18-19 EOY
1st 59% 71% 73% 86% 67% 81% 71% * 72% 84% 71% 83%
2nd 61% 43% 48% 61% 53% 52% 60% 25% 58% 55% 54% 51%
Total 60% 54% 60% 75% 60% 66% 67% 45% 65% 69% 63% 66%
TELPAS # Tested % Adv High Composite
% Progressed 1+ Prof Lvl - Composite
% Progressed 1+ Prof Lvl - Listening
% Progressed 1+ Prof Lvl - Speaking
% Progressed 1+ Prof Lvl - Reading
% Progressed 1+ Prof Lvl - Writing
1st
STAAR All Students - Reading All Students - Writing All Students - Math All Students - Science
Grade Lvl % App % Meets % Mst % App % Meets % Mst % App % Meets % Mst % App % Meets % Mst
3rd 57 23 14 60 26 8
4th 46 18 5 41 14 7 56 23 15
5th 65 24 7 85 30 9 35 7 2
Total 56 22 9 41 14 7 66 26 11 35 7 2
STAAR Hispanic African American ECD SpEd EL Students -
Spanish EL Students -
English EL Students -
Combined
Subject % App
% Meets
% Mst
% App
% Meets
% Mst
% App
% Meets
% Mst
% App
% Meets
% Mst
% App
% Meets
% Mst
% App
% Meets % Mst %
App % Meets
% Mst
Reading 57% 20 8 50 43 14 55 20 7 42 23 12 48 24 8 57 17 6 55 18 7
Writing 40% 13 8 0 0 0 38 11 6 33 17 17 100 0 0 34 7 36 11 0
Math 68% 25 11 64 29 67 25 10 58 27 12 25 20 4 76 21 8 68 21 8
Science 32% 9 2 57 0 0 36 8 2 38 0 0 0 0 0 29 11 3 26 7 3
Artifacts Reviewed: Checkmarks indicate systems/processes that are not yet fully implemented on the campus.
Austin Independent School District 14 of 18 10/9/19
Sample lessons with formative assessments
X Three to five instructional strategies identified and modeled with consistency and fidelity in all classrooms.
Leadership calendar with PLCs and walkthroughs scheduled
Assessment calendar with district-wide and level-specific testing expectations for the entire school year
Lesson Plan review protocol/criteria/templates
System for staff to identify students who have significant learning gaps
PLCs that include protected time for data analysis and lesson presentations monthly
Monthly progress monitoring and tracking tools for teachers and students
Lesson Plan submission and feedback cycle expectations and protocols
Consistent, efficient, and visible structures in the classroom
Sample PLC/Data Meeting minutes
X Sample Formative Assessments
Yearly Planning Guides (YPGs) for all grades and content areas (Scope and Sequence)
Class schedules with English and Spanish content and language allocation-for Dual Language and Transitional/Late Exit bilingual models
Dreambox reports/results Sample Data Analysis forms, including disaggregated data and plans for reteaching
Teacher-created PBL lesson plans and student products related to PBL
Dual Language Handbook (for campuses that have created one thus far)
Istation reports/results X AISD Literacy Framework
Data Analysis
Strengths, increases, and gaps closed (by grade levels, subjects, student groups, or languages): ISIP in Primary showed an increase in 1st grade (52-61% at Tier 1); All items in the TELL survey increased; ELs met their academic achievement target. in reading; Very close to making target on TELPAS (5 percentage points away from target) ISIP Overall gains Weaknesses, decreases, or existing gaps (by grade levels, subjects, student groups, or languages): 27% of 3rd graders are reading below grade level (one year or more) In math, there were no groups that met their growth target
Root Cause
Causal factors of areas of strength: ISIP was monitored weekly with goals set every month Sheltered instruction PD (7-Steps) and feedback was delivered; Language of instruction is closely monitored from the beginning of the year (with assessments given in both languages)
Austin Independent School District 15 of 18 10/9/19
Causal factors of areas of weakness that can be addressed by strategies in this improvement plan: Inconsistency in teaching practices and lesson delivery (staff leaving in the middle of the year, teacher effectiveness)
High-Quality Curriculum and Effective Instruction Strategies
startcollapse
Essential Action 5.1: Objective-driven daily lesson plans with formative assessments • All teachers create and submit daily lesson plans that include clear objectives, opening activities, time allotments that indicate the amount of time spent on each step of the lesson, multiple, differentiated paths of instruction to a clearly defined curricular goal, including paths to meet the specific needs of students
with disabilities and English learners among other student groups, and daily formative assessments along with exemplar responses. (ESF_PL5_EA1a_IMP)
Action Steps Refine the daily lesson plan format, which is aligned to the Barrington literacy framework, to include time allotments for each part of the lesson, specific AVID WICOR alignment and formative assessment (3rd-5th). Grade level teams will meet weekly to develop and submit lesson plans. Bi-weekly, teams will review the AVID binder as a student work sample.
Responsible Party
Admin and Coaches
Evidence of Implementation
Sample lesson plans for 3rd-5th, literacy expectations, grade level meeting agendas and minutes; AVID Binder Checklist
Funding Source
N/A
Timeline for Completion
August-May
Evidence Collection
Date
November 2019 February 2020 May 2020
Implementation Status
Necessary Adjustments/
Next Steps
Strategy #2 • Campus instructional leaders review lesson plans frequently for alignment to the standards, the scope and sequence, and the expected level of rigor, and
provide teachers with feedback and lesson planning support. (ESF_PL5_EA1b_IMP)
Action Steps
Responsible Party
Evidence of Implementation
Funding Source
Timeline for Completion
August-May
Evidence Collection
Date
Implementation Status
Necessary Adjustments/
Next Steps
Austin Independent School District 16 of 18 10/9/19
Develop a working document that explicitly shows the process for lesson plan feedback and how to solicit support
Admin and Coaches
Lesson plan feedback samples and coaching sign-up sheets
N/A November 14
startcollapse
startcollapse
Essential Action 5.3: Data driven instruction • Teachers use a corrective instruction action planning process, individually and in PLCs to analyze data, identify trends in student misconceptions, determine
the root cause as to why students may not have learned the concept, and create plans to reteach. (ESF_PL5_EA3b_INV)
Action Steps PLCs will meet every 4 weeks to plan, collaborate and use corrective instruction to design re-teach and intervention opportunities through data analysis.
Responsible Party
Admin and Coaches
Evidence of Implementation
Agendas, minutes, calendar, DMAC reports, progress monitoring tool (VoM)
Funding Source
N/A
Timeline for Completion
September-May
Evidence Collection
Date
November 2019 February 2020 May 2020
Implementation Status
Necessary Adjustments/
Next Steps
startcollapse
startcollapse
Progress Monitoring Cycle 1 (8/20-11/22) Cycle 2 (12/2-2/28) Cycle 3 (3/2-5/29) Cycle 4 (6/1-8/31)
Process Goal Teachers plan for teaching of tested standards and ensuring
Teachers plan for teaching of tested standards and ensuring
Teachers plan for teaching of tested standards and ensuring
Austin Independent School District 17 of 18 10/9/19
teacher capacity across the grade level. PLCs prioritize planning with rigor and alignment to standards.
teacher capacity across the grade level. PLCs prioritize planning with rigor and alignment to standards.
teacher capacity across the grade level. PLCs prioritize planning with rigor and alignment to standards.
Student Performance Goal 9-weeks District Assessment Average 3rd-5th Reading at Meets= All Students > =25, ELs>=23 Average 3rd-5th Math at Meets = All Students > = 30 ELs> =25
MoY District Assessment Average 3rd-5th Reading at Meets =All Students >=35, ELs>=26 Average 3rd-5th Math at Meets =All Students >= 35,ELs> =30
3rd 9-weeks District Assessment Average 3rd-5th Reading at Meets =All Students >= 40, ELs>=29 Average 3rd-5th Math = All Students >= 40,ELs>=35
STAAR Assessments Average 3rd-5th Reading at Meets =All Students >= 44, ELs>=33 Average 3rd-5th Math at Meets = All Students >= 46, ELs>=40
Student Performance Actual Results
Barriers to Address this Cycle Calendar affected by unplanned events such as student, staff, structural issues (AC). Teaching and learning affected by teacher absences leaving unfilled positions due to a lack of substitutes. Only one hour of time allotted for PLC due to consultation agreement
Calendar affected by unplanned events such as student, staff, structural issues (AC). Teaching and learning affected by teacher absences leaving unfilled positions due to a lack of substitutes. Only one hour of time allotted for PLC due to consultation agreement
Calendar affected by unplanned events such as student, staff, structural issues (AC). Teaching and learning affected by teacher absences leaving unfilled positions due to a lack of substitutes. Only one hour of time allotted for PLC due to consultation agreement
Calendar affected by unplanned events such as student, staff, structural issues (AC). Teaching and learning affected by teacher absences leaving unfilled positions due to a lack of substitutes. Only one hour of time allotted for PLC due to consultation agreement
District Actions for this Cycle If the DCSI regularly visits classrooms and acts as a thought-partner with the campus principal in relation to quality PLC/teacher planning , the quality of lessons and the quality and frequency of classroom observation, feedback and coaching then consistent, rigorous learning will expand to more classrooms.
If the DCSI regularly visits classrooms and acts as a thought-partner with the campus principal in relation to quality PLC/teacher planning , the quality of lessons and the quality and frequency of classroom observation, feedback and coaching then consistent, rigorous learning will expand to more classrooms.
If the DCSI regularly visits classrooms and acts as a thought-partner with the campus principal in relation to quality PLC/teacher planning , the quality of lessons and the quality and frequency of classroom observation, feedback and coaching then consistent, rigorous learning will expand to more classrooms.
If the DCSI regularly visits classrooms and acts as a thought-partner with the campus principal in relation to quality PLC/teacher planning , the quality of lessons and the quality and frequency of classroom observation, feedback and coaching then consistent, rigorous learning will expand to more classrooms.
Progress Monitoring Notes Did you achieve your 90-day outcome? Why or why not?
Did you achieve your 90-day outcome? Why or why not?
Did you achieve your 90-day outcome? Why or why not?
Did you achieve your 90-day outcome? Why or why not?
Austin Independent School District 18 of 18 10/9/19
Did you achieve your student performance goals listed above and on the Student Data page? Review the necessary adjustments/next steps notes for each action step. Which action steps from this cycle will you continue working on in the next cycle? What new milestones do you need to add to the next cycle?
Did you achieve your student performance goals listed above and on the Student Data page? Review the necessary adjustments/next steps notes for each action step. Which action steps from this cycle will you continue working on in the next cycle? What new milestones do you need to add to the next cycle?
Did you achieve your student performance goals listed above and on the Student Data page? Review the necessary adjustments/next steps notes for each action step. Which action steps from this cycle will you continue working on in the next cycle? What new milestones do you need to add to the next cycle?
Did you achieve your student performance goals listed above and on the Student Data page? Review the necessary adjustments/next steps notes for each action step. Which action steps from this cycle will you continue working on in the next cycle? What new milestones do you need to add to the next cycle?