2017-08-30 EARLI MOOQ Interactive Workshop Results
-
Upload
christian-m-stracke -
Category
Education
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of 2017-08-30 EARLI MOOQ Interactive Workshop Results
MOOQ for the quality of MOOCs: “We will make MOOCs better” Quality Reference Framework with indicators for design & comparison www.MOOC-quality.eu
Frameworks: MOOQ
Quality of Open Education and MOOCs: Interactive Workshop
@ EARLI 2017 in Tampere, Finland by Christian M. Stracke
Open University of the Netherlands
Open CC License for sharing & re-using slides
This work is free to share under the creative commons licence:
"Attribution – Noncommercial – Share Alike 3.0"
You can copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions:
1. Attribution – 2. Noncommercial –
3. Share Alike
Licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Some rights reserved, see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
MOOQ for the quality of MOOCs: “We will make MOOCs better” Quality Reference Framework with indicators for design & comparison www.MOOC-quality.eu
Frameworks: MOOQ
Quality Reference Framework with indicators for design & comparison
Our main goal is the collaboration with all to improve future MOOC design for better MOOC learning experiences
16 questions in 4 clusters (n=45): 1. Experience with MOOCs (5 questions) 2. Perception and Expectation (5 questions) 3. Personal Goals (4 questions) 4. Recognition and Certification (2 questions)
n=45: reveals that many MOOC learners do not share the intentions of the MOOC designer & have their own goals
MOOQ Pre-Survey
Three main surveys for learners, designers and facilitators of MOOCs
Please support us to improve next MOOCs: www.survey.MOOC-quality.eu
Your feedback is most welcome!
Combines 3 surveys on 13 constructs: 1. MOOC learners (69 questions) 2. MOOC designers (89 questions) 3. MOOC facilitators (58 questions)
3 months with huge support (n=625): reveals that most MOOC learners reported positive learning experiences with MOOCs
MOOQ Survey
What is Open Education (OE)? Quality dimensions of OE in practice? Quality indicators for OE in practice?
Quality Open Education
QRF Target Groups
Meso
Micro
Macro
MOOC providers MOOC designers
MOOC facilitators MOOC learners
National ministries Local authorities
How much do you agree with the five phases? (Analysis, Design, Implementation, Learning Process, Evaluation)
P-Q1: 5 Phases
Fully
disagree:
Disagree:
Neutral:
Agree:
Fully
agree:
N/A:
0 1 3 11 1 0
How much do you agree with the planned target groups? (National ministries, local authorities, MOOC providers, MOOC designers, MOOC facilitators, MOOC learners)
T-Q1: Target Groups
Fully
disagree:
Disagree:
Neutral:
Agree:
Fully
agree:
N/A:
0 0 1 12 1 0
How much do you agree that the planned instruments are helpful? (MOOC, Guidelines, Evaluation tools, Online communities, Design patterns, Checklists, Use cases, Authoring system, OER)
I-Q1: 9 Instruments
Fully
disagree:
Disagree:
Neutral:
Agree:
Fully
agree:
N/A:
0 0 1 9 2 1
Quality dimensions of OE in practice Dimension 1: Analysis Dimension 2: Design Dimension 3: Implementation Dimension 4: Learning Process Dimension 5: Evaluation & Optimization
OE Quality Dimensions
Quality indicators for OE in practice For Dimension 1: For Dimension 2: For Dimension n:
OE Quality Indicators
Quality indicators for analysis in OE: • Content structure • Learning tasks • Characteristics of target groups • Budgets and resources • Learning context • Why provided as MOOC? And not other type? • Convince stakeholders
OE D1: Analysis
Quality indicators for design in OE: • Usability • Accessibility • Constructive alignment of teaching (content
and objectives are aligned) • Interactivity design • Action design • Multimedia design • Motivation design
OE D2: Design
Quality indicators for design in OE: • Quality of learning tasks • Teaching strategy (deductive vs inductive) • Integration of content into narration • Flexibility • Heterogenuous learning paths • Focus on precise definition of learning content
+ what you can learn (goals, structure, intention) • What is the added value of the MOOC?
OE D2: Design
Quality indicators for design in OE: • Level of the MOOC (basics vs expertise) • Strategic plan for realization + marketing • Target audience definition + characteristics • Basic and special features (also for marketing) • Definition of indicators for learning success
(maybe clustering individual intentions into groups of learners)
OE D2: Design
Quality indicators for design in OE: • Question: How are the indicators related to
each other? (dependencies/intertwinned)
OE D2: Design
Q. indicators for implementation in OE: • Platform selection based on criteria for
learning goals and design • Communicate with the stakeholders • Meet the technical conditions + requirements • Create the course area with all assignments
according to the design • Define implementation period • Marketing
OE D3: Implementation
Q. indicators for implementation in OE: • Changing from implementation to preparation?
OE D3: Implementation
Quality indicators for learning in OE: • Collect enrollments before the start of the
Learning process • Scaffolding or help • Enough interactions among peers • Feedback from instructors • Measuring of indicators for learning success
(maybe clustering individual intentions into groups of learners)
OE D4: Learning Process
Quality indicators for learning in OE: • Monitoring system of learning process (that
learners know where they are) • Self-directed feedback through assignments
and self-assessment (in MOOCs without grades) • Assessment of students learning within the
learning process
OE D4: Learning Process