2017 03 open-access_public

18
Digital Natives Seminar: Open Access, Predatory Publishing & Constellation 3.15.2017 Sarah Kurpiel, Emerging Technologies Librarian Katy Scullin, Archives & Special Collections Librarian

Transcript of 2017 03 open-access_public

Page 1: 2017 03 open-access_public

Digital Natives Seminar:Open Access, Predatory

Publishing & Constellation 3.15.2017

Sarah Kurpiel, Emerging Technologies LibrarianKaty Scullin, Archives & Special Collections Librarian

Page 4: 2017 03 open-access_public

Publisher (Typically) Retains CopyrightMyth

Faculty can freely use their own published content in courses they teach.

Fact

This is often not true. If you transferred your copyright to the publisher at the time of publication, as most authors do, the publisher may restrict your right to re-use your content.

Source: Busting OA Myths by UNC Health Sciences Library

Page 5: 2017 03 open-access_public

Open AccessIn 2002, the Budapest Open Access Initiative defined open access as the “world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds.”

Page 6: 2017 03 open-access_public

Gold Open AccessAuthor publishes with an open access publisher and the work is freely available from the moment of publication.

Page 7: 2017 03 open-access_public

How It Works• Open Access Journals

• Publisher may be commercial or nonprofit.• Article published under Creative Commons Attribution License. • Author retains copyright.• Various funding strategies:

• Article Processing Charges (APC)• Subsidies from institutions• Advertising• Membership fees

• Hybrid Journals• Delayed Open Access Journals

Page 8: 2017 03 open-access_public

Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals• The economic or access policy of a journal doesn’t determine its peer

review policy. Most scholarly journals , whether open access or controlled-access, follow peer-review procedures. • Public Library of Science (PLoS) – Nonprofit publisher• BioMed Central (BMC) – For-profit publisher• Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) – Nonprofit index

Page 10: 2017 03 open-access_public

Predatory Publishers• They exist to make money by taking advantage of the “author-pays

model” of open access journal publishing.• They engage in questionable business practices, such as charging

excessive author fees or failing to disclose publication fees to potential authors.• They fail to follow accepted standards of scholarly publishing,

particularly in regards to peer review.

Source: “Predatory Publishers” by Julia K. Nims available under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Page 11: 2017 03 open-access_public

Federal Trade Commission v. OMICS GROUP INC.• Lawsuit filed in August 2016• Allegations:

• Publisher hides its fees until the papers have been accepted, making it difficult for authors to pull their articles and submit to other journals.• Many articles are not peer-reviewed.• Many scientists listed on editorial boards never agreed to appear there.• Some journals have names very similar to legitimate publications.• Publisher calculated its own impact scores without disclosing that fact.• Publisher includes names of prominent researchers as participants at the

conferences when many did not agree to participate.

Source: “FTC Charges Academic Journal Publisher OMICS Group Deceived Researchers”. Federal Trade Commission. 8/26/2016.

Page 12: 2017 03 open-access_public

Identifying Predatory Journals• Quality Indicators

• Open Access Journal Quality Indicators - Grand Valley State University• Think. Check. Submit. - COPE, DOAJ, SPARC, BioMed Central, and other orgs.

• Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers (archived Jan. 2017)• Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access journals -

Scholarly Open Access (1,312 journals)• Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers -

Scholarly Open Access (1,162 publishers)

Page 13: 2017 03 open-access_public

Green Open AccessAuthor adds a version of their article to a repository to allow for free access. Also called self-archiving.

Page 14: 2017 03 open-access_public

Institutional Repositories• An online archive for collecting, preserving, and disseminating digital

copies of the intellectual output of a university or research institution. • Types of items that may appear in an institutional repository:

• Copies of published scholarly articles• Research data• Student scholarship (theses, dissertations, etc.) • Archival materials

• Controversial repositories• ResearchGate.net, Academia.edu, Sci-Hub

Page 15: 2017 03 open-access_public

SHERPA/RoMEO• A searchable database of publisher’s policies regarding the self-

archiving of journal articles on the web and in Open Access repositories. • http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php

Page 16: 2017 03 open-access_public

SPARC Author Addendum• A legal instrument created by the Scholarly Publishing and Academic

Resources Coalition (SPARC) that you can use to modify your copyright transfer agreements with non-Open Access journal publishers. It allows you to select which individual rights out of the bundle of copyrights you want to keep, such as: • Distributing copies in the course of teaching and research, • Posting the article on a personal or institutional website, or • Creating derivative works.

Source: Author Rights: Using the SPARC Author Addendum

Page 17: 2017 03 open-access_public

Constellation• Benedictine’s institutional repository.

Established as a collaboration between LIBRAS libraries. • http://ben.constellation.libras.org/

Page 18: 2017 03 open-access_public

Thank You!PresentersSarah KurpielEmerging Technologies [email protected]

Katy ScullinArchives & Special Collections [email protected]