2016 July Ethanol Producer Magazine

www.ethanolproducer.com

JULY 2016

INSIDE: NEW TOOLS FOR INSPECTION, CIP, LABORATORIES

White Dog Labs ToutsMass Yield Improvement

Page 46

JULY 2016

BOOSTING CARBON

CONVERSION

Maintenance Matters

Page 28

New Cleaning Technologies

Page 34

Underappreciated Cooling Towers

Page 40

FASCINATING FACTS A B O U T E T H A N O L

LEARN MORE AT GROWTHENERGY.ORG/E15

BIOFUELS, LIKE ETHANOL ARE EARTH-FRIENDLY, AND HELP REDUCE CARBON EMISSIONS BY UP TO 57 PERCENT COMPARED TO GASOLINE, WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO CLIMATE CHANGE.

14.7BILLION GALLONS OF ETHANOL PRODUCED IN 2015 DISPLACES

ETHANOL HELPS

REDUCE TOXIC EMISSIONS ATTRIBUTED TO GASOLINE

527MILLION BARRELS OF OIL

4 | Ethanol Producer Magazine | JULY 2016

JULY 2016 VOLUME 22 ISSUE 7CONTENTS

DEPARTMENTS6 EDITOR'S NOTE

Maintenance, Compliance Now Confl ux By Tom Bryan

7 AD INDEX

8 THE WAY I SEE IT Corporate Cronyism

By Mike Bryan

9 EVENTS CALENDAR

10 VIEW FROM THE HILLRealities of the Market

By Bob Dinneen

12 DRIVEAdvocating for America’s

Success Story By Emily Skor

14 GRASSROOTS VOICEPower, Passion and Performance

By Brian Jennings

16 GLOBAL SCENENew Face for Canada's Biofuels,

Biobased Sectors By Andrea Kent

18 BUSINESS BRIEFS

20 COMMODITIES

22 DISTILLED

70 CLEARING THE AIR Helping Tell Ethanol’s Real Story

By Dave VanderGriend

74 MARKETPLACE

Ethanol Producer Magazine: (USPS No. 023-974) July 2016, Vol. 22, Issue 7. Ethanol Producer Magazine is published monthly by BBI International. Principal Offi ce: 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203. Periodicals Postage Paid at Grand Forks, North Dakota and additional mailing offi ces. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Ethanol Producer Magazine/Subscriptions, 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58203.

MAINTENANCE New Levels in Upkeep PlanningPlants keep one step ahead of maintenance and compliance issues By Ann Bailey

28CLEANING New SolutionsTwo companies introduce new cleaning technologies to the ethanol industryBy Ann Bailey

34

FEATURES

CONTRIBUTIONS

Bryan Tracy, CEO of White Dog Labs, led the team that discovered a bacteria that consumes C5 and C6 sugars, along with carbon dioxide, to achieve high mass yields.

ON THE COVER

COOLING TOWERS Conserving Cooling PowerProper maintenance avoids costly downtimeBy Holly Jessen

40TECHNOLOGY Sugar Plus CO2 Equals More EthanolWhite Dog Labs introduces mixotrophic fermentationBy Susanne Retka Schill

46

54 INSPECTION Video Borescoping TechnologyNew tool in the arsenal optimizes cleaning proceduresBy Andrew Ledlie

58 SAFETY Simplifying Safety During Planned ShutdownsCoordination and training aids effi cient maintenance operationsBy Chris McKinnon

62 SANITATION New Acid Solution Improves CIP ProgramsNaturally occurring, strong acid provides eff ective scale removalBy Brian Hoskins

66 SOFTWARE Preventing Production Problems in the LabLaboratory information management systems aid in interpreting volumes of dataBy Trish Meek

PHOTO: WHITE DOG LABS


FOR INDUSTRY NEWS: WWW.ETHANOLPRODUCER.COM OR FOLLOW US: TWITTER.COM/ETHANOLMAGAZINE

EDITOR'S NOTE

Maintenance, Compliance Now Conflux

Tom BryanPresident & Editor in [email protected]

Often, plant maintenance is needed when you’re least excited about it being performed. Summer gives producers total access to their campuses, inside and out and long working days to knock out tasks large and small. But it’s also when ethanol plants tend to run full throttle with limited personnel. Fortunately, summer upkeep is made easier and quicker by specialized service providers offering predicative maintenance, optimization and compliance support.

In “New Levels in Upkeep Planning,” on page 28, we discover how many ethanol plants turn to service providers to manage specifi c and interrelated maintenance and compliance issues. EPM Associate Editor Ann Bailey reports that those two things—maintenance and compliance—have become increasingly interwoven services in the ethanol industry. After all, even the most innocuous crack, failing seal or inoperable component can lead to unplanned shutdowns, noncompliance and hefty fi nes if not addressed quickly and correctly. Beyond spot-and-repair services, ethanol plants are receiving prescriptive maintenance plans based on the life expectancies of storage tanks, pressure vessels and other major assets. Ultimately, most ethanol plants utilize third-party maintenance and inspection companies for these services because it’s a cost-effective way to maximize plant reliability while staying in compliance with increasingly complicated regulations.

Our annual dive into plant maintenance continues with “New Solutions,” on page 34, also written by Bailey. Anytime you think you’ve seen it all in the ethanol industry, something new comes along. Plant cleaning tech is no different. Bailey reports on how one cleaning company is blending the strengths of dry and wet cleaning practices, deploying super-effi cient hydroblasting—using water when it’s needed most—and applying rotary-based, wet cleaning practices with dry mediums. The story also introduces us to a company supplying large brewers, including Anheuser Busch, with surfactants that reduce calcium oxalate buildup. It’s a proven solution that appears applicable to ethanol plants.

Freelance writer Holly Jessen further whets our interest in plant reliability with “Conserving Cooling Power,” on page 40. Cooling tower performance should be, but usually is not, a subject of conversation this time of year. These critical systems do their real work from June through September, and that’s also when these “out-of-sight, out-of-mind” assets tend to fail. As Jessen reports, deferred, or scant cooling-tower upkeep can result in curtailed production. Fortunately, there’s no shortage of companies offering cooling-tower optimization and maintenance services, and the Cooling Technology Institute also is there to help when needed.

We turn to production technology in our page-46 cover story, “Sugar Plus CO2 Equals More Ethanol.” In this in-depth profi le, EPM Managing Editor Susanne Retka Schill explains how White Dog Labs is using a microorganism for mixotrophic fermentation to convert carbon from both sugar and gas into ethanol. That word—mixotrophic—is used to describe the dual conversion process. The science is complex, but suffi ce to say that the company claims it results in a 50 percent increase in mass yield, with applicability to both fi rst- and second-generation ethanol plants.

JULY 2016 | Ethanol Producer Magazine | 7

VOLUME 22 ISSUE 7

TM

EDITORIALPresident & Editor in Chief Tom Bryan [email protected]

Vice President of Content & Executive Editor Tim Portz [email protected] Editor Susanne Retka Schill [email protected]

Associate Editor Ann Bailey [email protected] Editor Erin Voegele [email protected] Editor Jan Tellmann [email protected]

ARTArt Director Jaci Satterlund [email protected]

Graphic Designer Raquel Boushee [email protected]

PUBLISHINGChairman Mike Bryan [email protected]

CEO Joe Bryan [email protected]

SALES

Vice President of Operations Matthew Spoor [email protected] & Marketing Director John Nelson [email protected]

Business Development Director Howard Brockhouse [email protected] Account Manager/Bioenergy Team Leader Chip Shereck [email protected]

Account Manager Jeff Hogan [email protected] Circulation Manager Jessica Tiller [email protected]

Marketing & Advertising Manager Marla DeFoe [email protected]

EDITORIAL BOARD

Ringneck Energy Walter WendlandLittle Sioux Corn Processors Steve Roe

Commonwealth Agri-Energy Mick HendersonPinal Energy Keith Kor

Aemetis Advanced Fuels Eric McAfeePoet Scott Teigen

Western Plains Energy Derek Paine

Customer Service Please call 1-866-746-8385 or email us at [email protected]. Subscriptions to Ethanol Producer Magazine are free of charge to everyone with the exception of a shipping and han-dling charge of $49.95 for anyone outside the United States. To subscribe, visit www.EthanolProducer.com or you can send your mailing address and payment (checks made out to BBI International) to: Ethanol Producer Magazine Subscriptions, 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203. You can also fax a subscription form to 701-746-5367. Back Issues, Reprints and Permissions Select back issues are available for $3.95 each, plus shipping. Article reprints are also available for a fee. For more information, contact us at 866-746-8385 or [email protected]. Advertising Ethanol Producer Magazine provides a specific topic delivered to a highly targeted audience. We are committed to editorial excellence and high-quality print production. To find out more about Ethanol Producer Magazine advertising op-portunities, please contact us at 866-746-8385 or [email protected]. Letters to the Editor We welcome letters to the editor. Send to Ethanol Producer Magazine Letters to the Editor, 308 2nd Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203 or email to [email protected]. Please include your name, address and phone number. Letters may be edited for clarity and/or space.

COPYRIGHT © 2016 by BBI InternationalPlease recycle this magazine and remove inserts or samples before recycling

ADVERTISER INDEX2016 Fuel Ethanol Workshop & Expo 26-27Biomass Engineering & Equipment 32Buckman 44Cloud/Sellers Cleaning Systems 38 D3MAX LLC 75 Delta Cooling Towers, Inc. 64DuPont Industrial Biosciences 76Fagen Inc. 17Fluid Quip Process Technologies, LLC 3GEA Group 39Growth Energy 2Hengye Inc. 18Hydrite Chemical Co. 68Hydro-Klean LLC 60ICM, Inc. 9Interra Global Corporation 19J.C. Ramsdell Enviro Services, Inc. 66Kelso Technologies, Inc. 49Kelvion 31Lallemand Biofuels & Distilled Spirits 52Leaf - Lesaffre Advanced Fermentations 48Louis Dreyfus Company 65McC Inc. 22Mist Chemical & Supply Company 43Mole Master Services Corporation 51MonitorTech Corporation 25MPW Industrial Services 69Nalco Water 33New Age Cryo 5North American Industrial Services Group 45Phibro Ethanol Performance Group 13PITSolutions 59POET-DSM Advanced Biofuels 73Premium Plant Services, Inc. 56 RPMG, Inc. 50Seneca Companies 42Solenis LLC 11Sukup Manufacturing Co. 71Sumitomo Drive Technologies 61Summit 23Swedish Exergy AB 57Syngenta: Enogen 15Thermal Refractory 63Tower Performance, Inc. 24U.S. Grains Council 67Valicor Separation Technologies 30Veolia Water Technologies 55Victory Energy Operations, LLC 36-37Westmor Industries, LLC 53


I was dumfounded by an article written by George Banks and published in the Argus Leader on April 26, titled “Corn Ethanol Mandate Harmful to the Environment.” There are so many contradictions in the article that he should print a retraction.

Banks is vice president of the American Council for Capital Formation. According to its website, “Founded in 1973, The American Council for Capital Formation is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization advocating tax, energy, regulatory and environmental policies that facilitate saving and investment, economic growth and job creation.” Now that’s a plough that covers a lot of ground in one pass.

When I read his article, and then read the association’s “job description,” I couldn’t help but think that ethanol ticks every one of the boxes that the ACCF espouses. Yet it seems bent on promoting the agenda of the oil industry, especially when it comes to oil exports. It seems at cross-purposes to be an environmental advocate while at the same time supporting the exportation of fossil fuel, because we have too much here in America. It could be that I just have a sensitive nose, but I smell the oil industry influence in this article and the organization as a whole.

There seems to be disconnect between the stated mission of the ACCF and the U.S. ethanol industry, because it appears that the ethanol industry should be tops on its list of industries to promote, yet it is painfully obvious the oil industry has already taken that spot.

So, let’s stop pretending that the ACCF is this credible organization that represents investment, the environment and all of those good things. It represents the oil industry, and its opinion on the ethanol industry should be given zero credibility. I have looked at some past articles of the ACCF and, not surprisingly, I found one article on the fact that the oil industry still receives billions of dollars in subsidies while they has been stripped away from ethanol.

So, Mr. Banks, if you and the ACCF are looking for a poster child for corporate cronyism, look no further, you work for it.

That’s the way I see it!

Corporate Cronyism By Mike Bryan

Author: Mike BryanChairman, BBI International

[email protected]

THE WAY I SEE IT

Mission of the ACCF to Advocate Policies on: • Taxes

• Energy • Environment • Investment • Economic Growth

• Jobs

US Ethanol Industry Contributions: Millions of dollars in taxes paid Renewable energy Clean burning Billions of dollars invested Strong rural economic growth Hundreds of thousands of jobs

ACE Annual ConferenceAugust 8-10, 2016Loews HotelMinneapolis, MinnesotaACE’s annual conference is unique in the world of renewable fuels because it is specifically tailored to the interests and needs of the people of ethanol—the folks in the trenches. It’s a gathering of ACE’s commitment to connect ethanol producers with farmers, researchers, retailers, and support businesses to continue what all of them started a long time ago. It’s also an excellent place to learn and share ideas. And it has all the fun of a family reunion. Join us Aug. 8-10 at the Loews Hotel in downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota.

605-334-3381 | www.ethanol.org/conference

2017 International Biomass Conference & ExpoApril 10-12, 2017Minneapolis Convention CenterMinneapolis, MinnesotaOrganized by BBI International and produced by Biomass Magazine, this event brings current and future producers of bioenergy and biobased products together with waste generators, energy crop growers, municipal leaders, utility executives, technology providers, equipment manufacturers, project developers, investors and policy makers. It’s a true one-stop shop—the world’s premier educational and networking junction for all biomass industries.

866-746-8385 | www.biomassconference.com

2017 International Fuel Ethanol Workshop & ExpoJune 26-28, 2017Minneapolis Convention CenterMinneapolis, MinnesotaFrom its inception, the mission of the event has remained constant: The FEW delivers timely presentations with a strong focus on commercial-scale ethanol production—from quality control and yield maximization to regulatory compliance and fiscal management. The FEW is also the ethanol industry’s premier forum for unveiling new technologies and research findings. The program extensively covers cellulosic ethanol while remaining committed to optimizing existing grain ethanol operations.

866-746-8385 | www.fuelethanolworkshop.com

Ethanol Producer Magazine Webinar SeriesEthanol Producer Magazine offers complimentary webinars to attendees looking to expand their knowledge of the ethanol industry. Please visit the website to view upcoming and past webinar topics.

866-746-8385 | www.ethanolproducer.com/pages/webinar/

EVENTS CALENDAR

icminc.com/epm


In May, as the U.S. EPA released its draft renewable fuel standard (RFS) and renewable volume obligations (RVOs) for 2017, EPA spokeswoman Laura Allen said the agency “set volumes that are ambitious, yet achievable given the realities of the market.” Really? The ethanol industry has demonstrated the ability to produce more than 15.3 billion gallons annually. What’s ambitious about setting the standard 500 million gallons below what the industry can produce?

The reason, of course, is that EPA has bought completely into the narrative of the oil industry regarding the blend wall, believing “the realities of the market” preclude the agency from setting the RVO for conventional biofuels above 10 percent of the market. There are two glaring problems with EPA’s logic.

First, the law does not allow the agency to use waiver language specifically designed to address shortages in supply to be used to respond to perceived infrastructure limitations and biofuel demand. Indeed, EPA’s conflating of supply and demand is the subject of the industry’s ongoing lawsuit over the agency’s 2014, 2015 and 2016 RVO rule. We remain confident the court will appreciate the difference between supply and demand.

But more importantly, the EPA proposed rule reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the purpose of the RFS, which was designed to change the “realities of the market” and the way oil companies do business, to spur investment in cleaner, low-carbon, renewable fuels and the infrastructure to accommodate higher blends. It was designed to give consumers more choices at the pump, lower gas prices and move beyond today’s market reality where biofuels are only used as gasoline additives to boost octane. The RFS was intended to create a wholly new market reality.

The second point, however, is that even if the agency could consider infrastructure and demand, there is no reason to set the standard for conventional biofuels below 2017 statutory levels. There is quite literally no circumstance in which any obligated party would be unable to meet its requirement. Prior to the release of the proposed rule, the Renewable Fuels Association met with EPA and the Office of Management and Budget to provide our assessment of how easy it would be to meet the 15 billion gallons standard in 2017.

It is important to recognize at the outset that other biofuels qualify for D6 renewable identification numbers (RINs). Renewable diesel, some biodiesel, E15 and E85 contributed approximately 800 million gallons toward last year’s 14.5 billion gallons standard for undifferentiated renewable fuel. Also, because of USDA’s infrastructure grant program and the Prime the Pump initiative, E85 and E15 sales are climbing at an unprecedented rate. Gasoline demand is rising in response to low prices and a recovering economy. The 15 billion gallons requirement easily could be met.

One final point. Even if our conservative demand estimates prove to be wrong, there is a 2 billion-plus surplus of D6 RINs that could be tapped, if necessary, by any obligated party finding itself short on its obligation—the ultimate insurance policy for a 15 billion gallons RVO.

If this administration wants to encourage investment in new technologies as it says, maximize greenhouse gas reductions consistent with its climate change rhetoric, boost a flagging farm economy and lower consumer gasoline prices, it will return the RFS to the statutory levels and finally begin to change the “realities of the market.”

Realities of the Market By Bob Dinneen

VIEW FROM THE HILL

Author: Bob DinneenPresident and CEO,

Renewable Fuels Association202-289-3835

solenis.com/ethanol

2015

At Solenis, we are committed to helping you stay ahead of the curve. Whether you need to increase your yields, meet a regulatory requirement or reduceyour costs, we’ve got you covered.

Antibiotic-free fermentation aids

2009Corn oil

extraction aids

2012Low-corrosion biocide for cooling systems

2011Knowledge-based

control system

2014Blended scale inhibitors for evaporators

A LEGACY OF PROVEN INNOVATION

Process AidsWater Treatment ChemistriesMonitoring and Control Systems


As the new chief executive officer of Growth Energy, I am thrilled and humbled to join such a great team of passionate individuals to advance one of America’s most dynamic and forward-looking industries. And I am excited to work closely with our membership who are thoroughly invested in the effort.

As people in the industry already know, ethanol is truly a great American success story. To continue that progress, it is vital that we help our neighbors and policymakers better understand and believe in the value of American biofuels and to act upon those beliefs.

Our message isn’t a hard one; we have so many great examples to highlight in communities around the country. Every single day, ethanol is working to slash greenhouse gas emissions, so we can all breathe a little easier. It replaces toxic additives that have been linked to cancer and smog. It powers our cars and keeps our engines running smoothly. And it reduces America’s reliance on oil from hostile nations in the Middle East. My top goal will be to amplify that message with consumers, retailers, industry allies and, of course, policymakers by every means available.

These are the type of consumer-focused public relations battles I have spent decades fighting. Before joining Growth Energy, I served as Consumer Healthcare Products Association vice president for communications and CHPA Educational Foundation executive director. Day-in and day-out, we leveraged smart, strategic communications and a broad base of stakeholders to make our voices heard in major regulatory and legislative debates. By harnessing these assets, I have worked to defeat more than 100 state proposals aimed at limiting consumer access to over-the-counter medications.

At Growth Energy, the challenge is similar, though greater in scale, and I’ll use every tool in our arsenal to expand our base of supporters, amplify voices of American consumers and evangelize the immense benefits of ethanol. We will continue to fight for commonsense polices like the renewable fuel standard (RFS) and market access for E15, including the Reid vapor pressure waiver. We will build upon programs

like Prime the Pump, which promotes domestic ethanol consumption by facilitating the construction of new blending infrastructure.

I also hope to expand the reach of our world-class industry into new markets at home and across the globe. Like you, I know that consumers will choose ethanol if given the choice. We will continue to engage with the international community to open new export markets for ethanol and its coproducts.

Growth Energy’s mission will not be limited, however, to advocacy in Washington or outreach to consumers. As part of a holistic approach, we will work to educate Americans about the benefits of a strong domestic ethanol industry, expanding the visibility of our contributions beyond the D.C. Beltway and the Corn Belt. With the public on our side, there’s no limit to what our industry can achieve.

Of course, none of this would be possible without the strong base of support that Growth Energy has built during the course of several years. I am inspired and awed by all Tom Buis accomplished during his tenure as CEO. We will carry forward his passion and unwavering commitment to doing right by the people in this industry and always advancing the cause. We are fortunate he will serve as co-chair of the board of directors so we will continue to benefit from his wisdom and experience.

It may take a little time, but I look forward to meeting all Growth Energy members, hearing their stories and sharing in their ambitions. Together, along with all stakeholders in the industry, we will ensure that ethanol remains the model against which all energy technologies are judged, by policymakers, business leaders, environmentalists, consumers and loving parents everywhere working to build a brighter future.

We will change the terms of the debate and the result will be more gallons of ethanol produced, a larger marketplace, a cleaner environment and greater energy security. The industry already has made great strides, and I look forward to working with everyone to build on that success and take it to new heights.

Author: Emily SkorCEO, Growth Energy

[email protected]

DRIVE

Advocating for America’s Success StoryBy Emily Skor

Phibro Animal Health Corporation • 300 Frank W. Burr Blvd., Ste 21, Teaneck, NJ 07666-6712 • 800-223-0434 • EthanolPerformanceGroup.com

©2016 Phibro Animal Health Corporation. Lactrol, PhibroPen, PhibroXact, PhibroClean, PhibroAC, and Cleaner Process, Cleaner Fuels, Cleaner Air are trademarks owned by or licensed to Phibro Animal Health Corporation or its a�liates.

To put the Phibro Ethanol Performance portfolio to work for you, contact your Phibro sales representative or call 1-877-203-1911.

The goal of your plant is to maximize yield day-in and day-out. In order to achieve this goal you need to have a solid foundation, starting with the cleanest plant possible, which is what the suite of products from the Phibro Ethanol Performance Group can help provide. Backed by decades of industry experience and the state-of-the-art Ethanol Performance Diagnostic Center, the Phibro Ethanol Performance Group delivers high-quality products that are safe, e�ective and all suitable for use under FSMA.

Lactrol® PhibroXact™PhibroPen®PhibroAC™

PhibroClean™

Reduced SmogNo Aromatics

No MTBE

Antimicrobials • Process AidsCleaning Products • Yeast

CLEANER CLEANER CLEANERPROCESS FUEL AIR™

RenewableHigher Blends

Consumer Choice


Power, Passion and Performance By Brian Jennings

Nearly 70 members of the American Coalition for Ethanol traveled to Washington, D.C., this spring as part of our 8th annual fl y-in. We met with staff in more than 125 congressional offi ces representing 36 states, conveying the importance of the renewable fuel standard (RFS) and bipartisan, bicameral legislation (H.R. 1736 and S. 1239) to extend Reid vapor pressure (RVP) relief to E15 and higher blends (which have more ethanol but fewer evaporative emissions than E10 and gasoline) during the June 1 through Sept. 15 summer ozone season.

During the two-day fl y-in, we ran back-to-back, full-page ads in Roll Call, a popular Capitol Hill publication with a circulation of more than 22,000. The ad buy highlighted the RFS and RVP relief legislation using the real-life stories of Charlie Good, an ASE-certifi ed mechanic and C-store owner who wants the U.S. EPA to let him sell E15 year-round, and Delayne Johnson, CEO of Quad County Corn Processors, whose company is the fi rst to successfully commercialize cellulosic biofuel from corn kernel fi ber.

Our opponents constantly are telling Congress the RFS must be repealed and that using E15 places cars and station owners at risk. Retailers helped us counterpunch during the fl y-in by sharing fi rst-hand experiences with their customers who are buying low-cost, high-octane E15 and fl ex fuels, thanks to Congress standing strong on the RFS.

Fly-in participants met with Trevor Reuschel, USDA acting deputy director, who provided an update on the status of the Biofuels Infrastructure Partnership program. Rep. Adrian Smith, R-Neb., also spoke to the group regarding his legislation (H.R. 1736) to extend the RVP waiver to E15 and higher blends. Finally, our attendees heard from Lindsey Erb and Tom Sleight of the U.S. Grains Council, who shared their perspective on global demand for ethanol. ACE is a new member of the USGC and we’ve invited Erb and Sleight back to our conference in Minneapolis to give an update on activities designed to promote additional sales of U.S. ethanol and DDGS worldwide.

Speaking of ACE’s conference, I encourage everyone to join us Aug. 8-10 at the Loews Minneapolis Hotel for our “Power, Passion,

Performance” themed event. We think those three words fi ttingly describe the strengths and future of the ethanol industry. The world is going on a low-carbon diet and having seconds on octane, and that makes ethanol an essential ingredient. Many of our conference topics will delve into what the people of ethanol are doing to capitalize on the high-octane, low-carbon future. For example, we have a panel discussion titled “Octane’s Value Proposition and Regulatory Path Forward,” which will cover how refi ners calculate for the octane value of ethanol and the federal regulatory pathways that must be navigated to eventually get a higher-octane fuel with more ethanol approved.

Keeping with the ACE conference theme, speakers will explain how ethanol producers can reduce their plants' carbon intensity through a better understanding of data from the fi eld, energy inputs and optimizing plant operations, while other presenters will provide an overview on the Paris climate agreements and legal insight on exports, policy and regulations. Leading retailers around the country who are making the switch to E15 and fl ex fuels will be on the ACE conference stage to share why and how the industry can move even more gallons by increasing our share of the retail fuel market. Our keynote address will be from Tom Kloza, global head of energy analysis for the Oil Price Information Service, with his always insightful analysis of energy markets. You won’t want to miss his presentation. Finally, Kristy Moore, one of the industry’s top technical experts, will lead a session discussing why ASTM membership is important to ethanol producers and how to join and participate in the ASTM process for developing fuel specs. Moore also will explain EPA’s proposed fuel quality specifi cations for blends containing 16 through 83 percent ethanol.

ACE is grateful to the members who support our grassroots fl y-ins and we invite you to join us in Minneapolis in August for our annual conference.

Author: Brian Jennings

Executive Vice PresidentAmerican Coalition for Ethanol

[email protected]

GRASSROOTS VOICE

While most innovation begins with the seed of an idea, the greatest advance in the making of ethanol starts with a seed. The first corn seed technology speci�cally developed to increase the ef�ciency of ethanol production, Enogen® corn can reduce costs by up to 10% and helps generate more ethanol per bushel than any corn feedstock ever grown. Recently named AgriMarketing’s Product of the Year, Enogen is de�nitely making waves in the �eld of energy.

Ironically, the latest breakthrough in the field of energy, is a field.

© 2016 Syngenta. Enogen®, the Alliance Frame, the Purpose Icon, and the Syngenta logo are trademarks of a Syngenta Group Company. Syngenta Customer Center: 1-866-SYNGENT(A) (796-4368). www.FarmAssist.com MW 1ENG6003_8.5 x 10.875 1/16


New Face for Canada’s Biofuels, Biobased Sectors By Andrea Kent

It is an exciting time for Canada’s renewable fuels and biobased product sectors. Industry leaders are impacting the energy landscape greatly, building the nation’s biobased economy and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

To reflect this, the national voice of Canada’s biofuels sector has rebranded from the Canadian Renewable Fuels Association to Renewable Industries Canada. The change reinforces our 32-year-old association’s mission to promote the use of value-added products made from renewable resources. RICanada’s mandate now goes beyond renewable fuels to include advanced biofuels and policy programs that will support greater research, development and commercialization of renewable and biobased industrial products. For us, this is a natural extension of who we are and what we do best.

I can’t think of a more fitting time for our association to update itself. After all, just take a look at what renewable fuels producers are doing. Our industry and member companies have been hard at work growing their businesses and diversifying their products beyond liquid transportation fuels for some time, while governments increasingly are searching for ways to reduce carbon emissions and fight climate change.

As important as we believe these changes to our brand are, biofuels always will be a core focus of our work and a proud part of who we are. RICanada will continue to work with all levels of government to increase biofuel content requirements, open new market opportunities for renewable fuels and ensure producers of GHG-reducing fuels and products are recognized fairly in carbon pricing models.

Biofuels helped start the transition to low-carbon fuel and remain a valued and needed part of any successful low-carbon strategy going forward. They are the quickest route to GHG emission reductions within the transport sector, accounting for

approximately 23 percent of Canada’s total emissions. Canadian biofuels producers already have helped remove the equivalent of 1 million cars worth of carbon emissions from Canada’s roads every year.

More can be done. Liquid fuels will be required for years to come, while the potential of other renewable energy sources and electric vehicles are being harnessed sufficiently, and biofuels are a simple solution to help governments meet emission reduction targets. They also may be the only option for the heavy-duty sector to reduce its emissions in the longer term. The more renewable fuels we use, the greater the emission reductions from the transportation sector will be.

With that in mind, RICanada is proposing a strategy to reduce emissions by another 4 million metric tons, whereby the mandated amount of ethanol blended into Canadian gasoline is increased from 5 to 10 percent and the biodiesel content of diesel fuel is increased from 2 to 5 percent. This would bring the total emission reductions from biofuels in Canada to almost 9 million metric tons, removing the equivalent emissions of another 1 million cars from our roads.

As many of Canada’s ethanol producers already have shown, growing beyond biofuels is not only possible, it’s essential. I’m proud to say that Renewable Industries Canada has followed suit. Together, we will continue to grow the industry to the benefit of all Canadians for years to come.

Author: Andrea KentPresident,

Renewable Industries Canada613-594-5528

[email protected]

GLOBAL SCENE


Murex LLC has executed a multi-year ethanol marketing agreement with White Energy. �e agreement calls for Murex to market all three of White Energy’s pro-duction locations, two in Texas and one in Kansas, totaling 295 million gallons of permitted ethanol production annually.

Cellulosic Sugar Producers Coopera-tive, an Ontario-based farmer’s cooperative, has entered into a memorandum of under-standing with Comet Biore�ning to col-laborate on the development of a sustain-able agricultural biomass supply chain in southwestern Ontario. Comet Biore�ning recently announced Sarnia, Ontario, as the location of its commercial-scale biomass-derived sugar facility. �e plant will process more than 60,000 metric tons of corn sto-ver or wheat straw per year into dextrose sugar. �e production of these sugars and coproducts will support the production of bioproducts such as biochemicals and bio-fuels.

Ecolab Inc. has changed the name

of Nalco, its water and process services business, to Nalco Water. �e new name more clearly communicates Nalco’s water management expertise as water scarcity is becoming a major global challenge and an increasing constraint to business growth.

Ametek Inc. has completed the

acquisition of Brookfield Engineer-ing Laboratories, a manufacturer of viscometers and rheometers, and ESP/SurgeX, a provider of energy intelli-gence and power protection solutions.

Hydro-�ermal Corp. has to reorga-

nized its sta� into industry-speci�c teams in response to increasing sales and the ever-changing complexity of its business. �e teams cover newer applications as well as established markets, including food and beverage; ethanol, starch and sweetener; and industrial. Sales sta� previously were divided by geographic territory, with seg-ments broken out for U.S. and Canada and

international. Sales, engineering and mar-keting sta� were a�ected by the reorganiza-tion. All sales sta� now will have a speci�c, dedicated industry. Existing sales relation-ships will be transitioned gradually to their new contacts and the team will work to-gether to ensure that all current sales op-portunities are properly serviced.

Green Plains Inc.’s board of direc-

tors has appointed Ejnar Knudsen as an independent director. Knudsen is founder and managing partner of AGR Partners, where he oversees the �rm’s investment process. He serves on the board of two AGR portfolio companies, Ridley Corp. and Opal Foods. He is the co-founder and director of Materra and currently serves on the board of Western Milling. He is also chair of the Dairy Club, director on the California Ag Leadership Foundation board and chair of its �nance committee, and a member of the Farm Foundation.

Jeanne McCahe-rty became CEO of Guardian Energy Management LLC in May, leading its etha-nol operations head-quartered in Prior Lake, Minnesota. McCaherty most recently worked at Cargill as vice president, regional director for North and South American regions for the textur-izing business unit. In that role, she led a $480 million business and a team of 400 in all aspects of the business from origina-tion and manufacturing to marketing and human resources. Before that, she held numerous leadership positions, including global director of the cultures and en-zymes business as well as several leadership roles in global research and development.

�e Renewable Fuels Association has received a Transcaer National Achieve-ment Award for hosting a series of semi-nars last year on ethanol safety and emer-gency responders. �is is the fourth year

BUSINESS BRIEFSPeople, Partnerships & Deals

McCaherty


RFA has been awarded this honor by the Transportation Community Awareness and Emergency Response initiative. �e award is given in recognition of extraordinary achievement by an individual person, com-pany, organization or a team in support of the Transcaer initiative. Transcaer is a vol-unteer coalition that works to ensure emer-gency responders and their communities are educated with the most up-to-date infor-mation and are prepared to handle hazard-ous material incidents. In 2015, RFA held 15 ethanol safety seminars and two train-the-trainer events. �ose events collectively trained 541 �rst responders. In addition, Missy Ru�, technical services manager of RFA, received a Transcaer Individual Achievement Award for her work last year in planning the ethanol safety events.

Midwest AgEner-gy Group has named Je� Zueger as its CEO. MAG owns Blue Flint Ethanol in Underwood, North Dakota, and Da-kota Spirit AgEnergy, in Spiritwood, North Da-kota. Both are 65 MMgy ethanol plants. MAG is owned by Great River Energy and other accredited investors, including ag producers and businesses. Zueger worked for Great River Energy from 1993 to 2006 in engineering and operations at the coop-erative’s two power plants in central North Dakota, Stanton Station and Coal Creek Station. He was leader of generation and operations support when Great River En-ergy began to explore building an ethanol facility to utilize unused energy at Coal Creek Station. He became general man-ager for Blue Flint Ethanol in 2006 and led construction, startup and overall business activities. In 2012, Zueger became chief operating o�cer for Midwest AgEnergy Group as the business prepared to build Dakota Spirit AgEnergy. In that position, Zueger managed all aspects of the business for Midwest AgEnergy Group.

Cassie Mullen has joined the Renew-able Fuels Association as director of mar-ket development. She primarily will focus on working with the supply chain to fa-cilitate expansion of infrastructure capable of o�ering higher-level ethanol blends to consumers. Mullen has been working with fuel retailers for more than two decades, conducting station equipment evaluations, providing equipment recommendations and helping them build new stations. She is well-versed in environmental compli-ance, EMV and major oil branding and marketing agreements, and has owned retail stations during her career. Mullen spent nearly six years as business develop-ment/manager for Kansas-based fuel equip-ment business P.B. Hoidale and nearly 10 years as director of sales and marketing for Missouri-based Neumayer Equipment Co. Most recently, she worked as an ex-ecutive for Seneca Companies, managing a 17-state territory of retailer accounts.

Green Biologics Inc., the U.S. sub-sidiary of U.K.-based Green Biologics Ltd., announced two distribution agreements in early April. �e company is currently retro�tting a corn ethanol plant in Little Falls, Minnesota, to produce renewable n-butanol and acetone. �e �rst distribution agreement is with Texas-based Nexeo Solu-tions. Nexeo Solutions will become Green Biologics’ national distributor of n-butanol and acetone to U.S. customers in several key markets, including coatings, adhesives, sealants and elastomers; household, indus-trial and institutional cleaners; personal care intermediates; and energy chemicals. �e second distribution agreement was signed with Acme-Hardesty, a division of Jacob Stern & Sons Inc. and leading supplier of biobased chemicals. Acme-Hardesty will focus its e�orts on marketing Green Biologics’ n-butanol and acetone for high-value applications in food ingredients, cleaning products and biolubricants.

SHARE YOUR INDUSTRY NEWS: To be included in the Business Briefs, send information (including photos and logos, if avail-able) to Business Briefs, Ethanol Producer Magazine, 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304, Grand Forks, ND 58203. You may also email information to [email protected]. Please include your name and telephone number.

BUSINESS BRIEFS¦

Zueger


May 23—With natural gas demand in a lull, weather forecasts for the coming summer came into focus in late May. The consen-sus among meteorologists is for a warmer-than-normal season wrought with more Atlantic hurricane activity than in recent years. The once-strong El Nino that contributed to the warmest winter on record in most of the U.S. has collapsed quickly and is poised to flip to La Nina by fall—a key consideration for forecasters of temperature and precipitation anomalies as well as hurricanes.

With production moving away from the Gulf during the past decade, the market no longer views the Atlantic hurricane season, which stretches from June through November, as quite as promi-nent of a risk to energy supply. However, a major storm that dam-ages Gulf production and transportation infrastructure could have a significant impact on natural gas supply, supporting price volatil-ity. North Carolina State University predicts more activity than nor-mal this year, with 15 to 18 named storms and three to five major hurricanes and one to three Gulf hurricanes.

This summer already is poised to be a banner year for natural gas burn for power and hot weather would ratchet up demand. The

National Weather Service forecasts strong probability of warmer-than-normal weather from June through August. Natural gas de-mand for power generation peaked last July at nearly 34 Bcf per day. A combination of widespread heat and relatively inexpensive natural gas could push demand higher this summer, potentially test-ing the all-time record of 34.9 Bcf set in July 2012.

Natural Gas Report

Corn Report

May 23—The late May corn market followed the soy complex amid production concerns in the Southern Hemisphere and a global vegetable oil deficit. A weakening U.S. dollar helped spur export de-mand, which could be a result of issues with Brazil’s second corn crop. The late-March acreage report also led the soy complex.

The USDA lowered the corn carryout in the May report due to an increase in corn exports, which jumped by 75 million bushels. Food, seed and industrial use increased by 11 million bushels while imports increased by 5 million bushels. Overall carryout declined by 79 million bushels—a market surprise. The May report revealed the USDA’s first projections for the 2016-’17 marketing year. The USDA pegs yield at 168 bushels per acre versus 168.4 last year. Demand expectations in-crease next year with feed and exports up 300 and 175 million bushels, respectively. Corn for ethanol production is expected to increase by 50 million bushels to 5.3 billion bushels. Carryout is projected at 2.153 bil-lion bushels, up from 1.803 billion this marketing year and, if realized, the largest carryout since 1990.

Global corn carryout in the current year declined slightly; however, the 2016-’17 projected carryout is 207.04 million metric tons (mmt), in-line with the previous year. Brazil production for 2015-’16 decreased from 84 to 81 mmt due to a poor growing conditions for the second

Brazilian corn crop. Argentina corn production declined 1 mmt to 27 mmt and the 2016-’17 crop is already projected at 34 mmt. Brazil is projected at 82 mmt.

Natural gas use will burn hot this summer by Andy Huenefeld

Corn follows soy complex in May market by Jason Sagebiel

COMMODITIES Prices & Market Analyses

Comments in this column are market commentary and are not to be construed as market advice.


DDGS Report

Ethanol Report

May 23—Strong gains developed in ethanol and RBOB gasoline markets through the month of May as fi rm buy-er support kept corn futures near $4 per bushel in front-month contracts, while the summer driving season neared. The Me-morial Day holiday is typically the start of the summer vacation season and indicates when holiday travel begins.

Prices for gasoline and ethanol have rallied 8 to 10 cents per gallon in front-month futures contracts during the past month in anticipation of growing demand and tightening supplies. The stronger de-

mand is causing inventory levels of both gasoline and ethanol to move back to much more manageable levels than seen earlier in the year.

If these levels hold, fi rm price sup-port is expected to continue throughout early summer. Ethanol markets are not an isolated island though, as strength in the crude oil market and in world economies unifi es solid support through the entire energy complex, allowing widespread market support to develop through the end of spring.

May 23—As Memorial Day app-roached, the DDGS market was infl uenced by prices of soymeal and Chinese buying, up $15 to $25 per ton from April. Near-by markets were tight, and the deferred months were being quoted at a discount. Most users in the U.S. have DDGS in the rations to the maximum and we’re begin-ning to see that in overseas markets as well.

Domestically, the futures run-up that occurred in mid-May gave buyers some pause, putting a hold on their buying. With the pipelines running thin, they were collec-tively coming to the market for their next week’s needs and pushing the market up on themselves. Nearby values were a premium, a dynamic that held for quite a while.

In the export markets, buyers were even more in denial about prices moving higher than domestic folks. Export buyers

were scrambling to fi nd alternatives in a market where few existed. In China, there was talk about a release of some of the corn it has in reserve—at market prices—but that has yet to be seen. With the price of soymeal, demand was coming in from most of the Pacifi c Rim countries. They feed many more monogastric animals (hogs and poultry) that are in need of protein, and DDGS is a viable alternative.

Overall, it feels like the market will stay elevated. Higher DDGS prices are increas-ing ethanol plant margins and we would ex-pect to see full production. Higher soymeal prices are expected to remain the driver for a while, but eventually buyers’ attention will be turning to Chinese buying decisions. Soon, crop conditions will be the focus of attention.

Regional Ethanol Prices ($/gallon)Front Month Futures (AC) $1.604Region Spot RackWest Coast 1.755 1.850 Midwest 1.600 1.768 East Coast 1.680 1.851

SOURCE: DTN

Regional Gasoline Prices ($/gallon)Front Month Futures Price (RBOB) $1.635Region Spot RackWest Coast 1.546 1.985Midwest 1.783 1.532East Coast 1.533 1.565

SOURCE: DTN

DDGS Prices ($/ton)LOCATION Jul 2016 Jun 2016 Jul 2015Minnesota 135 120 160Chicago 168 140 185Buffalo, N.Y. 160 140 175Central Calif. 200 179 214Central Fla. 170 155 204

SOURCE: CHS INC.

Corn Futures Prices (July Futures)Date close, bu. close, tonMay 20, 2016 3.945 140.893April 20, 2016 3.998 142.768May 20, 2015 3.600 128.571

SOURCE: FCSTONE

Cash Sorghum ($/bushel)Location May 20,

2016April 22,

2016May 15,

2015Superior, Neb. 3.29 3.12 4.41Beatrice, Neb. 3.21 2.97 3.91Sublette, Kan. 3.11 2.92 3.66Salina, Kan. 3.20 3.02 4.36Triangle, Texas 3.30 3.02 3.91Gulf, Texas 3.82 4.19 5.57

SOURCE: SORGHUM SYNERGIES

Natural Gas Prices ($/MMBtu)LOCATION May 20,

2016March 31,

2016May 21,

2015NYMEX 2.062 1.959 2.949NNG Ventura 1.815 1.805 2.905Calif. Citygate 1.870 1.990 3.055

SOURCE: U.S. ENERGY SERVICES INC.

U.S. Ethanol Production (1,000 barrels)Per Day Month End Stocks

Mar 2016 994 30,812 22,301Feb 2016 989 28,678 23,004Mar 2015 951 29,489 20,865

SOURCE: U.S. ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION

DDGS market boosted by soymeal prices, Chinese buying

by Sean Broderick

Seasonal demand sparks price rally in gasoline, ethanol

by Rick Kment


DISTILLEDEthanol News & Trends

The Indiana Office of Development and the Indiana Corn Marketing Council awarded more than $789,000 in April to fuel retailer Fam-ily Express under the Hoosier Homegrown Fuels Blender Pump Program, supporting the deploy-ment of 45 blender pumps across eight counties.

According to the Renewable Fuels Associa-tion, 34 of the stations already offer E85 and will be adding E15. Three stations will be new and of-fer E15 and E85.

The goal of the HHF program is to expand the availability of higher ethanol blends in areas of the state where they are limited or not avail-able. It is jointly funded by the USDA’s Farm Service Agency and the Indiana Corn Marketing Council. This is the second round of grant an-nouncements under the HHF program.

“Family Express, 2015 Chain of the Year, has been a leader in offering ethanol-blended fuel options to their customers for years and this an-nouncement demonstrates their commitment to providing Indiana consumers with choices at the pump,” said David Gottbrath, Indiana Corn Mar-keting Council president and farmer from Wash-ington County.

Indiana funding supports blender pump deployment

On May 18, the U.S. EPA released a proposed rule to set 2017 renewable volume obligations (RVOs) under the renewable fuel standard (RFS), along with 2018 RVOs for biomass-based diesel.

The agency has proposed to set the 2017 RVO for cellulosic biofuel at 312 million gallons, with the advanced biofuel RVO at 4 billion gallons and the RVO for total renewable fuel at 18.8 billion gallons. The 2018 RVO for biomass-based diesel has been proposed at 2.1 billion gallons.

The proposed percentage standards call for renewable fuel to comprise 10.44 percent of the transportation fuel pool next year. The cellulosic standard would be 0.173 percent, with the biomass-based diesel standard at 1.67 percent, and the advanced biofuel standard at 2.22 percent.

While many in the biofuel industry commended the EPA for the timely re-lease of the proposed rule, the agency has been criticized for its interpretation of the waiver authority provided in statute to reduce RVOs below statutory levels. The EPA’s interpretation cites infrastructure concerns as a reason to reduce RVO levels.

EPA releases 2017 RFS proposal

Renewable fuel volume requirements2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Cellulosic biofuel (million gallons) 33 123 230 312* n/a

Biomass-based diesel (billion gallons) 1.63 1.73 1.90 2.00 2.1*

Advanced biofuel (billion gallons) 2.67 2.88 3.61 4.0* n/a

Renewable fuel (billion gallons) 16.28 16.93 18.11 18.8* n/a* PROPOSED VOLUME REQUIREMENTSSOURCE: U.S. EPA


Comet Biorefining Inc. has an offtake agreement to supply high-purity dextrose feedstock from its proposed facility in Sar-nia, Ontario, to BioAmber Inc., which operates a biobased suc-cinic acid plant in Sarnia. The dextrose will be produced from agricultural residues.

The offtake agreement includes provisions for Comet to supply dextrose to future BioAmber facilities and provides Bio-Amber with exclusive rights in the fields of succinic acid, 1,4-bu-tanediol (BDO) and tetrahydrofuran (THF). According to Com-et, the offtake agreement is the culmination of development work performed by both companies as part of BioIndustrial Innovation Canada’s recently completed cellulosic sugar study.

BioAmber provided an equity investment in Comet last year and BioAmber CEO Jean-Francois Huc has joined Comet’s board of directors.

“We have tested many second generation sugars and Comet offers dextrose that is on par with dextrose from corn, both in terms of quality and price,” said Huc. “Comet has proven this by operating a large demonstration plant in Italy, setting them apart from others. Comet has also put together a unique value chain in Southwestern Ontario, bringing together farmers, technology, offtakers and government. We are looking forward to participat-ing in their exciting growth prospects.”

Comet, BioAmber sign offtake agreement for dextrose feedstock

EPA releases first quarter RIN data

U.S. EPA data has shown more than 4.37 billion renewable iden-tification numbers (RINs) were generated during the first quarter of the year, including a net total of 30.15 million D3 cellulosic biofuels RINS. More than 1 million D3 RINs have been generated for cellu-losic ethanol so far this year, along with 17.83 million for renewable compressed natural gas and 12.7 million for renewable liquefied natu-ral gas. In addition, a net total of 114,835 D7 cellulosic diesel RINs were generated in March for cellulosic heating oil.

A net total of 12.6 million D5 advanced biofuel RINs were gen-erated during the first quarter of 2016, including nearly 6.2 million for ethanol. Nearly 3.68 billion D6 renewable fuel RINs were generated during the first three months of the year. The majority, 3.6 billion, were generated for ethanol. In addition, approximately 650.25 mil-lion D4 biomass-based diesel RINs were generated during the first quarter.

Net RINs generated during Q1 2016 (in millions)D3 30.15

D4 650.25

D5 12.60

D6 3,676.04

D7 0.11SOURCE: U.S. EPA

Synthetic Lubricantsfor the Ethanol Producer

Protect your Compressors, Gears, Bearings, Pumps and Mechanical SealsSummit synthetic lubricants can improve your equipment reliability while reducing downtime

and energy consumption. They can provide you with a large selection of lubricants in a

wide range of viscosities that resist oxidation, enhance wear protection, and reduce friction.

Summit’s product line of synthetic lubricants will meet or exceed OEM standards.

800.749.5823

SummitQuality • Service • Expertise

We invite you to visit our website at www.klsummit.comto see the many lubricants Summit has to offer.

FREE

Technical

Support &

Used Oil

Analysis

Summit May_July ad_Layout 1 3/16/2016 2:14 PM Page 1

DISTILLED


DISTILLED

RFA releases analysis of LCFS data

The Renewable Fuels Association re-cently released an analysis of California Low Carbon Fuel Standard data, noting grain-based ethanol provided approximate-ly half of the greenhouse gas (GHG) re-ductions achieved during the first five years of the program.

The RFA analysis of the raw LCFS data indicates regulated parties have re-duced the carbon intensity (CI) of the state’s transportation fuels by 16.55 million metric tons of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases (GHGs) since LCFS enforcement be-gan in 2011. Grain-based ethanol generated 7.58 million metric tons of CI reductions during that time, accounting for 46 percent of total LCFS credits and nearly 75 percent of credits in the gasoline pool. Sugarcane and molasses-based ethanol resulted in 0.88 million metric tons of CI reductions, or less than 5 percent of total LCFS credits.

Overall, the RFA notes liquid biofuels have accounted for 87 percent of LCFS

credits, including 51 percent for ethanol, and 17 percent each for renewable diesel and biodiesel. Fossil-CNG and fossil-LNG accounted for a respective 5 percent and 1 percent, while bio-CNG and bio-LNG accounted for 3 percent and 2 percent, re-spectively. Electricity accounted for approx-imately 4 percent. Other sources of fuels, including hydrogen, accounted for less than 1 percent.

The effort to stop the U.S. EPA from implementing a model that unfairly blames ethanol for increased emissions hit a tempo-rary setback this spring, said officials from the Urban Air Initiative.

In April, the U.S Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit dismissed a lawsuit filed by UAI along with the state of Kansas, the state of Nebraska and the Energy Future Coalition to require EPA to stop the Mo-tor Vehicle Emissions Simulator for 2014 (MOVES2014 Model) from being imple-

mented. The court dismissed the petition on grounds that Kansas and Nebraska do not yet have standing to challenge the com-puter model, which states are required to use to meet air quality standards.

According to the UAI, the court did not rule on the claims that the model’s es-timates of ethanol’s emissions effects are fundamentally flawed and that EPA failed to invite and consider public comment on the model as required by the Administrative Procedure Act.

UAI: Court decision on MOVES Model a temporary setback

California LCFS carbon credit generation, 2011-2015Ethanol 51%

Renewable diesel 17%

Biodiesel 17%

Fossil CNG 5%

Electricity 4%

Bio-CNG 3%

Bio-LNG 2%

Fossil LNG 1%

Other 0%SOURCE: RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION


DISTILLED

The Iowa Department of Transporta-tion and Iowa Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management have released a study that reveals insights into the transportation of biofuels and crude oil by rail around and through the state.

The study used a series of interviews and meetings with government agencies, railroads, emergency response personnel, emergency managers, rail shippers and biofuels producers to cover four main topic

areas: prevention of spills, preparedness in the event of a spill, response to an incident, and recovery from an incident.

The study outlines actions that can be taken within the state to improve preven-tion, preparedness, response and recovery. Overall, the study identified 22 specific challenges and outlined several specific rec-ommendations and improvement actions for each.

Iowa study focuses on improving ethanol, crude oil rail transport safety

Iowa rail factsGallons of ethanol produced in Iowa during 2015, with the majority shipped by rail

4 billion

Miles of railroad-owned track in Iowa 3,851

Railroads hauling crude or biofuels in Iowa 8SOURCE: IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aemetis to acquire Edeniq and its cellulosic technology

In May, Aemetis Inc. announced it has entered a definitive agreement with Ede-niq, under which Aemetis will acquire all of Edeniq’s outstanding shares in a stock-plus-cash merger transaction. The transaction was expected to close during the second quarter. Upon completion of the transac-tion, Edeniq will operate as a wholly owned subsidiary of Aemetis.

Edeniq has developed patented tech-nology that uses a combination of mechani-cal and biological processes to unlock cel-lulosic and starch sugars. To date, 29 of the company’s Cellunators have been installed at six U.S. ethanol plants. The company has

also signed several license agreements for its Pathway technology, which integrates the mechanical Cellunator equipment with cel-lulase enzymes to convert corn kernel fiber to cellulosic ethanol.

“The acquisition of Edeniq will fur-ther Aemetis’ plan to lead the deployment of technology to transition traditional bio-fuels plants into the production of valuable advanced biofuels, upgrading the existing infrastructure found at the 210 ethanol pro-duction facilities operating throughout the United States,” said Eric McAfee, chairman and CEO of Aemetis.


TM

Advanced Biofuels

U.S

. In

dustrial Pellet Associatio

n

ww

w .t h e u si p a .org


PHOTO: ZACH KOBRINKSY


Facing 10-year checkups, ethanol facilities turn to service providers to help stay ahead of maintenance and compliance issues. By Ann Bailey

Upkeep Planning

MAINTENANCE

Many ethanol plants built during the industry’s boom years are at, or approaching 10 years of opera-tion. The new set of challenges—how to spot issues in tanks and pipes, discontinued parts, planning upgrades for outdated systems, keeping com-pliant with regulations—calls for a new level in maintenance planning.

“Plants all run differently and they all have their own mindsets in their management teams, so we can set up a plan for them, but that plan is dynamic,” says Paula Emberland, ERI Solutions account manager. ERI, based in Colwich, Kansas, has added nondestructive testing and inspection services in recent years to complement its work with safety inspections and regulatory compliance. The maintenance plan ERI Solutions designs for plants is flexible, Emberland says. “It’s not a hard, fast, set plan because that just doesn’t work,” she says. “If plant managers see something they think might be having an issue with or their efficiencies are poor, they may call us and say ‘You know what, we really want to get these evaps done this time versus next time.’”

The goal of ERI’s maintenance plan for its ethanol plant customers is to ensure that the plants are in compliance with U.S. EPA regulations, Emberland says. “Sometimes we get out there and see some pretty seri-

NEW LEVELS IN


UPGRADE PLANNING: Shown is an example of an upgraded chemical feed system for use in ethanol facilities. PHOTO: US WATER

ous issues that need to be taken care of right away—for example, the tanks. They’ll have a prob-lem with their floating roof that could be an EPA issue or they’ll have a crack in one of the welds in the floor that could, again, be an EPA issue if that tank leaks.”

ERI Solutions recommends plants have contractors on-site or on call before it arrives for in-spection. That way, if ERI identi-fies a problem during an inspec-tion, the contractor can fix it and then ERI can do another inspec-tion, Emberland says. “We’ll re-inspect the welds or the problems and ensure that they are repaired correctly and that the plant then can go back into operation or put that tank back in use.”

Besides identifying near-term problems, ERI’s inspection also helps plants determine the longevity of its tanks, Ember-

land says. “The other thing all this testing does is that it allows the plant to come up with an esti-mated lifetime expectancy, so on the tanks, for example, if there are certain things found, we can provide them with an expected lifetime expectancy so they can preschedule repairs if they need to. If they don’t need to do them this year, maybe they need to do them in five years. That allows managers to plan for the future and determine which tanks and pressure vessel issues they need to take care of and budget for.”

Mechanical IntegrityLincoln, Nebraska-based

Olsson Associates, which pro-vides engineering services to a variety of industries, also pro-vides inspection schedules for ethanol plants, says Shawn Za-blocki, Olsson Associates indus-

MAINTENANCE

trial program leader. “We can help them develop an actual mechanical integrity pro-gram that applies to their pumps, their con-trol devices, their safety devices, to the stan-dards required within the procedures, plus a written document as to how you are going to perform those mechanical integrity in-spections and what you’re going to follow,” Zablocki says. “We can help put together an integrity inspection schedule for the tanks.”

For ethanol plant managers faced with meeting the requirements of myriad rules and regulations, hiring an outside company to monitor and address their maintenance needs can not only bring clarity to what can be confusing, but also save money, Za-blocki says. For example, there are several standards that apply to ethanol plants, one set being from the American Petroleum Institute. “A lot of people will default to API standards for smaller tanks and vessels when they really don’t need to. So they’ll hold themselves to a standard with respect to what’s expected and also with respect to a more frequent inspection schedule.”

“API has a couple of different stan-dards. API 653, which is for large atmo-spheric tanks. API 510 applies to pressure vessels and also to vacuum vessels. Where plants have columns that are run under vac-uum systems, we’ll inspect to API 510. API

570 applies to piping systems—all of the pipe racks and pipe systems. The Steel Tank Institute has a code that generally applies to the smaller atmospheric tanks. So for things like a flash receiver or flash vessel that are not under pressure and basically shop-fabri-

After Sales and Service Magazine Ad2.indd 1 5/16/2016 10:17:19 AM

HIDDEN WEAR: Nondestructive scanning methods help with identifying difficult-to-see issues. Floor scans, for instance help spot corrosion caused by groundwater on the underside of the floor. PHOTO: OLSSON ASSOC.


cated tanks, STI would apply. That’s a much less stringent code than the American Pe-troleum Institute standards.”

Olsson Associates strives to ensure that its ethanol industry clients are compli-ant with the proper codes and standards so they aren’t spending more than they need to on the testing programs and can apply that money to other projects, Zablocki says. There also is some confusion regarding EPA and OSHA regulations for process safety management or a risk management plan, he says. “They specify that plants should do in-tegrity testing. Sometimes people think that EPA or OSHA is providing the inspection code or standard, and they do not. They simply say the plant should test to appli-cable codes and standards, which then goes back to the API and Steel Tank Institute.”

“Basically, the plants need to do in-spections at appropriate intervals and we do provide that special service,” Zablocki says.

Water Treatment PlusIn addition to water and process tech-

nologies, U.S. Water provides long-term maintenance and inspection services to customers, including ethanol plants, across the United States, says Mitch Manstedt, U.S. Water, strategic business leader. “U.S. Water has a lot of different areas that we touch on in ethanol facilities,” Manstedt says. “We can impact a lot of ongoing day-to-day mainte-nance and also the longer-term liability and upgrade due to aging equipment.

“We are on call as needed. Typically, someone in U.S. Water is available 24/7 for emergency response, inspections, etc. Also, we’re in these facilities on a routine basis be-cause our sales and services representatives are going to these facilities either weekly or monthly to conduct analytical testing, sys-tem integrity checks, inventory monitoring. They look at any issues and long-term prob-lem areas that need to be addressed and re-solved.”

“Most of the maintenance is centered on pretreatment equipment, which would be up-front of the water systems in these facilities. Pretreatment equipment is what we could consider a consumable item”, Manstedt says. “There are items in there that go bad, due to age or due to poor water quality that need to be looked at, addressed,

SAFETY FIRST: Certain inspection jobs require special training to do thorough inspections of hard-to-reach or hazardous areas. PHOTO: OLSSON ASSOC.


tested and identified on a regular basis,” he says. Pretreatment equipment could be con-sidered the “life blood” of the water treat-ment system, he notes. If it is operating ef-ficiently and maintained properly, the rest of the system runs seamlessly.

As ethanol plants age and technol-ogy advances, providing services to ethanol plants may mean melding the old with the new, Manstedt says. “When I first started with U.S. Water 10 years ago, some of these pieces of equipment didn’t have the ability to interface with the current ethanol plant control system. They were single stand-alone pieces of equipment that really didn’t have any eyes, ears or data being able to be captured from them.

“With advancements in automation today we can seamlessly integrate those controls and automation packages into the plant control system they’re operating at their facility,” Manstedt says. “They can con-trol it, they can trend it, they can collect the data. They can have programs that officially monitor how well the systems are operating and really get a good idea of what needs to be done and be proactive for scheduled maintenance, for scheduled cleaning. U.S. Water provides its ethanol clients with the expertise to keep the plants’ old and new technology and systems running efficiently, Manstedt says. “By looking at these pieces of equipment and understanding the life cycle, we can predict when replacement or upgrade is needed to reduce downtime, in-crease efficiencies and positively impact the bottom line.”

U.S. Water, like ERI and Olsson As-sociates, offers its clients short-term and long-term plans to address their mainte-nance needs. “Depending on what the facil-ity has for equipment or items that needed to be addressed, we have monthly, quarterly and yearly checks done on certain pieces of equipment, maintenance or analysis of those pieces of equipment and those are checked to make sure that we are keeping the system up-to-date and operating effi-ciently,” Manstedt says.

For example, about 40 percent of the ethanol facilities built in the past 10 years have a certain piece of software equipment. U.S. Water recently learned that the compa-ny that makes the software is going to start

discontinuing a certain line of products, Manstedt says. That means that U.S. Water needs to be proactive and plan how it will acquire spare parts and make them available to their clients and then determine the next step. “Once they discontinue a line, how do we keep that line operational for future years?” Manstedt asks. “Or do we come up with a whole new upgrade or replacement?” Each plant will choose differently, he says. “Some, for example, may want to continue using their current operating system, while

others may decide to wait three years and then implement a new technology. Every plant is handled on a case-by-case basis un-derstanding what’s best for it and, hopefully, what’s best for that piece of equipment.”

Author: Ann BaileyAssociate Editor, Ethanol Producer Magazine

[email protected]

Optimize the Cost of your Cooling System

3D TRASAR™ Cooling Water Technology:• Detects system variability

• Determines the correct response

• Delivers operational efficiencies

Call Jason Van’t Hul today at 605-360-6657.

What’s in it for me? Optimized Total Cost of Operation• Save water with

increased cycles of concentration

• Reduce energy demand with scale and fouling prevention

• Extend asset life with customized applications

Greater peace of mind• Access real-time

system data via performance dashboards

• Feel confident knowing system experts watch your system 24/7

MAINTENANCE


NEWSolutions

Companies introduce new approaches to keeping ethanol facilities clean. By Ann Bailey

WORKING CLEAN: Innovative Plant Solutions has developed unique tools and processes with the goal of reducing time requirements at ethanol plants by up to 20 percent. PHOTO: INNOVATIVE PLANT SOLUTIONS


CLEANING

2015_ETHANOL AD_ HALF-PAGE SPREAD.indd 1 5/12/2015 10:18:00 AM

TRUCK SERVICE: Launched in early 2016, Hibbing, Minn.-based Innovative Plant Solutions travels to ethanol plants throughout the Midwest to provide state-of-the-art cleaning services that combine wet and dry cleaning processes. PHOTO: INNOVATIVE PLANT SOLUTIONS

2015_ETHANOL AD_ HALF-PAGE SPREAD.indd 1 5/12/2015 10:18:00 AM

Long-time companies know that one of their keys to success is to be flexible, so they not only meet the demands of loyal customers, but also at-tract new ones. Two industrial cleaning services are examples of companies bringing new technologies to the ethanol industry.

Arizona-based Clear Solutions USA LLC serves customers in the brewing and food industries, including 12 U.S. Anheuser Busch production facilities. The company owns eight patents and has three pending for specially formulated cleaning solutions.

Innovative Plant Solutions is a new company with a sister firm well-known in the ethanol industry, Premium Plant Services. Both based in Hibbing, Minnesota, Premium Plant Services primarily serves customers in Minnesota and Iowa. Innovative Plant Solutions serves customers throughout the Midwest. Both provide a variety of cleaning services including dry ice blasting, hydroblasting, industrial vacuuming and sponge blasting. The companies are working to bring new dry and wet cleaning technologies to the ethanol industry.

Ethanol Producer Magazine talked to the CEOs about their companies and what they offer the ethanol industry. Here’s an edited version of what they had to say:

CLEANING


Mark ParenteauInnovative Plant Solutions

“Premium Plant Services, the sister com-pany of Innovative Plant Solutions, decided that before it began to offer other services to the industry, even vac services, that we were going to perfect the hydroblasting side of it, and we did. We created an industry standard of the cleaning ability for hydroblasting.

“Steve Farris, Innovative Plant Solutions vice president, approached me about getting an idea to the industry where we could effec-tively combine the dry and the wet cleaning in a very efficient manner, getting the best of

both worlds. You don’t have all water, but use it where you really need it. But it’s hard to replace the benefit of the horsepower that comes with hydroblasting and the advantages of dry. For example, if there is construction going on in the area, it isn’t as messy and the cleanup isn’t as difficult with the dry side.

“What Steve Farris and Innovative Plant Solutions have done in water cleaning is to de-velop rotary tooling where in water, you use tooling that’s not manned. Why it’s so much more effective is, you take 350-horsepower and put on a tool and get out of the way. It’s automated and it rotates 360 degrees and gets inside vessels and inside ductwork.

“If you can take that concept and apply it in dry cleaning, that’s very innovative. It’s nev-er been done in the ethanol industry. We are going to be, as far as I know, the first people that will be providing a rotary method for dry cleaning.

“On the water side, what we want is for IPS to be doing innovative cleaning work and customize our tooling. We’re really good at hy-droblasting—there’s a lot of physics that go into hydroblasting. We understand fluids and pressure. Steve Farris has come up with a pro-cess in hydroblasting where we can be more efficient with the water by tooling and we can reduce the water by 30 percent. We’ve taken away a lot of the reasons people don’t like hy-droblasting methodology for their shutdowns.

“If we then bring in the process of dry, where we are more efficient and effective, we think the customers are going to end up get-ting the best of both worlds. At the end of the day, the plant is getting the best of the technol-ogy offered, by both dry and water.

“One of the biggest problems right now that we’re having, matter of fact, is trying to keep the throttle regulated on demand. It needs to grow, but we’ve got to grow under control or this whole thing can be washed down the stream. One of the biggest mistakes I have seen in this industry, in my 15 years, is people overcommit. Premium has had that experience. We’re guilty of that same thing. We learned years ago of the consequences of that.”

Lance RenfrowClear Solutions USA

“In the late ‘60s and early ‘70s, the magic, if that was the right word, was cleaning with liquid—with caustic soda and sodium gluco-nate. Sodium gluconate is pretty well-designed as a chelator that takes into account hard water. In the late ‘70s and early ‘80s, when phosphates were taken out of detergents, the industry tried to compensate with a product called phospho-nate. Primarily, it is an environmentally friendly substitute for phosphate.

“In the early ‘80s we started working with the brewery people, explaining why phospho-nates were used in addition to gluconates. They started with dry gluconate product and when they found that the dry wasn’t very soluble and caustic, they made a liquid.

“As we moved forward to the late ‘80s and very early ‘90’s we came across beer stone, basically the buildup of calcium oxalate. I think that the ethanol producers know about that build up very well, depending on the area of the country.

Efficient, Powerful, Dependable cleaning heads for tanks and fermenters up to 70 feet in diameter.

Jumbo™

Sellers 360

Tankman™

• Unmatched versatility • Low-maintenance operation• Long-term reliability • Industry specified

Cloud/Sellers, 4855 Morabito Place, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 USAPhone: 805-549-8093 Fax: 805-549-0131Email: [email protected] Web: www.cloudinc.com

ROTATING WASH HEADS FOR ALL PROCESS VESSELS

CLEANING


Corn Oil Recovery Yields Profits for ProducersAdding a GEA RSE 220 separator to your plant can provide a new revenue

stream by recovering valuable corn oil. Efficient and economical, the

separator pays for itself within a year of installation. Besides the income

generated by the corn oil, the process reduces energy consumption during

drying for further savings. VOC emissions are also decreased.

• Easy retrofit at the back-end of the plant

• Fast ROI

• Energy savings

• Reduced VOC emissions for plant safety.

To learn how you can use the most sought after

corn oil separator to increase profitability

and improve plant efficiency, email

[email protected], call

800-722-6622, or visit us online.

2219

T

s energy consumption during

e also decreased.

ter

“It was pointed out to me by one of the people at Anheuser Busch that the cal-cium oxalate phenomena not only was a cleaning problem because it builds up, but it also had an effect on the shelf life of the beer. I was summoned by the corporate office of Anheuser Busch in St. Louis and asked if I could fix the buildup problem.

“This buildup, much like plaque on your teeth, is very hard to clean. We set out to solve the problem of beer stone and Anheuser Busch was good enough to al-low us to trial our original product at brew-eries in Fairfield, California.

“It took two or three years, because companies move very slowly, to incorpo-rate it totally in their system. We did this at Miller and Busch. We worked through several versions of that product, which is basically a surfactant to reduce surface ten-sion, to make it more wettable. When you make something more wettable, all sorts of things happen. We generally say we can use about half the amount of product in half the time with far better results.

“We’ve done this now for quite some time with several improvements. The last revision we had was in 2002 and the patent was issued in 2005. That version we still use today.

“It doesn’t make any difference what you’re cleaning in the food and beverage industry. You could take milk, cheese, ice cream, potato chips. What we basically do is to take an individual look at each plant and formulate for that company. You must know the temperatures it operates in, the water hardness and, particularly, if it changes. We also must know the final con-centration of the working solution, which in most places in the ethanol industry we see somewhere around 5 percent. What that means is they can take the caustic soda they currently use and dilute it down to about 5 percent. It’s pretty dramatic. There are some other factors involved that are a little bit different than the beer industry, but that’s how it works. There’s nothing like this product in the ethanol industry.

“We’re excited to bring this product to the ethanol industry and to come to the International Fuel Ethanol Workshop in Milwaukee.”

Author: Ann Bailey

Associate Editor, Ethanol Producer [email protected]

701-738-4976


COOLING TOWERS

Neglecting cooling tower maintenance can curtail production, especially in the hot summer months. By Holly Jessen

CONSERVING Cooling Power

When it comes to optimization projects, an ethanol plant’s cooling tower typically doesn’t even make the list. In fact, many facilities don’t perform regular cooling tower inspections, says Frank Foster, vice president of Tower Performance Inc.

“Run to failure is kind of what happens,” he says, adding that cooling towers simply aren’t considered a priority piece of equipment. “If people hear the fan turning, motor running and water falling, they assume everything is OK,” he says. “It just doesn’t get the attention that some of the other equipment gets.” TPI, which is headquartered in New Jersey, provides repairs and upgrades to cooling towers and new cooling tower installations.

As chairman of the membership committee of Cooling Technology Institute, a not-for-profit technical organization for owners and operators, suppliers and ven-dors of cooling towers, Foster knows it’s an issue that isn’t limited to the ethanol in-dustry. It’s the same in the other industries that utilize cooling towers. “They don’t really notice it until it’s really catastrophic or it’s really limiting production,” he says.

Rick Hollendieck, owner of Sys-Kool LLC, a cooling tower company head-quartered in Omaha, Nebraska, characterizes the attitude as, no news is good news. “They are a neglected piece of equipment because they aren’t inside the plant, they’re outside the plant out by themselves, and probably aren’t running at prime capacity,” he says. Sys-Kool specializes in analyzing cooling tower operations and then servicing, upgrading or modifying the equipment.

PHOTO: ZACH KOBRINKSY


Neal Jakel concurs, saying many don’t understand the basic principles of cooling tower operations. Before managing an Illi-nois ethanol plant, he spent 15 years build-ing, designing and engineering corn wet mill plants for Cargill Inc., including modifying cooling towers. He now is vice president of strategy and technology for Fluid Quip Process Technologies, which, among other things, does cooling tower optimization projects at ethanol plants.

Understanding how cooling tow-ers work, how they are integrated into the plant’s whole cooling system and how to op-timize those systems are learning opportuni-ties for the ethanol industry, Jakel says. He also believes it’s critical that the details of

tower design are understood before opera-tional changes are made.

Foster also believes there is a general lack of understanding of cooling tower principles. “I’ve found that they really don’t understand what the cooling tower’s pur-pose is other than getting cold water,” he says. One thing companies can do is to in-vite an expert to the plant to talk about cool-ing tower basics, he suggests

To learn more about cooling tower op-eration, Foster recommends companies join CTI, which was established in 1950 to set standards, guidelines and best practices for cooling towers. At the website, members and nonmembers alike can access technical papers, some free and some for a fee, or use

the “ask the expert” feature to get help for a specific problem. CTI also can make rec-ommendations on good service and equip-ment companies, helping companies avoid those that may not have their best interests in mind. “It’s just one stop to find out any-thing you want to know about cooling tow-ers,” he says.

For Foster, one of the key benefits of becoming a member of CTI is networking with other owner operators. It offers com-panies the opportunity to speak to other members, some of whom may have already solved an issue they need help with, which can help save a lot of money.

Keys to Better Operation Keeping the fill material, sometimes

also known as packing, inside a cooling tow-er clean is important for efficient operation, Hollendieck says. The first step in chemical treatment is to discourage growth of things like algae and bacteria. It’s also important to deal with fouling from dirt and other parti-cles that end up in the cooling tower. “Cool-ing towers are what I call great air scrub-bers,” he says. “Anything that is flying in the air gets sucked into the cooling tower.”

When fill material is fouled with dirt and calcium, it can be as heavy as 80 or 100 pounds. In comparison, a new 2-foot-by-2-foot-by-6-foot pack of fill weighs only about 20 pounds. Removing and replacing

Shutdown Turnaround Cleaning

24-Hour Emergency Spill Response

Dry Ice & Up to 40K Water Blasting Services

Wet or Dry Vacuum Truck Services

Serving the Ethanol Industry throughout the Midwest, Southern and Mountain Regions

Go to www.senecaco.com/ethanol to request more information.

COOLING TOWERS

INSPECTION SCHEDULE: Experts recommend weekly screen cleaning and monthly walk-around inspections to look, listen and feel for problems. More thorough inspections should be part of shutdowns, to check areas inaccessible during operations. PHOTO: SUSANNE RETKA SCHILL, BBI INTERNATIONAL


Shutdown Turnaround Cleaning

24-Hour Emergency Spill Response

Dry Ice & Up to 40K Water Blasting Services

Wet or Dry Vacuum Truck Services

Serving the Ethanol Industry throughout the Midwest, Southern and Mountain Regions

Go to www.senecaco.com/ethanol to request more information.

Want Increased Process Efficiency?

Contact us to set up a free on-site process

evaluation, and learn how our plant-specific solutions can help improve yields—

and your bottom line.

Introducing MIST’s new innovative alternative to antibiotics!

fouled fill improves performance. “They might be running at 70 or 80 percent effi-ciency because it’s all fouled, and then when we get done, we put it back to 100 percent” Hollendieck says.

Water and air distribution is another area that is vital to cooling tower perfor-mance. Hollendieck sometimes sees cool-ing towers with too much water pumped through them, or overpumping, because operators think the more water flow, the better. On the other hand, some operators under pump. In both cases, air contact with water is reduced, which lowers heat transfer efficiency.

Another misunderstanding about cool-ing tower operations is that the colder the water is, the better, Jakel says. The reality is that Midwest cooling towers should typically operate at about the same temperature in the summer and the winter. If a cooling tower freezes up, it can cause dangerous ice build-up on the structure and more. “Ideally, dur-ing winter operations the water should not be below 60 degrees Fahrenheit in the tower basin,” he says. “If the water gets too cold, then the amount of water needed through the entire plant is reduced, causing a cascade of issues.” A couple of examples are dam-age to cooling tower packing and fouling and mineral buildup on heat exchangers.

In the summer, to keep water evaporat-ing at a high rate, and therefore providing

maximum cooling, it’s important to make sure the cooling tower is performing at maximum design air flow. To measure this, operators should look at the horsepower or amp draw on fan motors, Jakel says. If fans or blades are rated for higher cubic feet per minute of air flow than what they are draw-ing, this can be adjusted by changing the

pitch of the blades for increased air flow. However, operators should keep in mind that air flow can be set too high, sometimes causing packing to lift up, Jakel cautions. “Understanding the details of the tower de-sign is critical before making any fan blade adjustments.”

PERFORMANCE: Regular maintenance on fill packs, along with attention to water and air distribution, improves performance. PHOTO: SUSANNE RETKA SCHILL, BBI INTERNATIONAL


Some chemical companies focus only on process. Some focus solely on water treatment. Buckman takes a comprehensive approach and looks at the bigger picture — return on investment and environment. We look at every aspect of your plant’s operation,

tailoring chemistries to boost production and increase profitability — from evaporator efficiency to corn oil recovery to water treatment issues. To find out more or to schedule a system audit, contact your Buckman representative or email [email protected].

© 2014 Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. All rights reserved.

Some chemical companies focus on this or that .

Buckman takes a wider view.

Cooling tower or full cooling system optimization projects offer ethanol pro-ducers many opportunities for overall op-erational efficiency. In fact, Jakel believes cooling tower inefficiency is curtailing pro-duction at many ethanol plants. “A lot of plants still struggle in the summertime with effectively cooling the fermenters, which dramatically impacts not only rates, but yield and throughput,” he says.

Foster concurs. “It’s a gradual thing,” he tells EPM. “They learn to compensate for lack of performance from the tower. They really don’t go and see if the tower is the culprit for a lack of production.”

Often, when he asks people about their cooling towers they say it’s working fine. Then he asks about what happens in the summer and they reply, “Oh, no. It’s awful in the summertime.”

The summer season, from June to Sep-tember, is when cooling towers are pushed to provide maximum cooling. “This is one of the reasons why it goes out of sight out of mind,” Foster says. “After they get past the summer season, you can’t tell if the cooling tower is efficient, because it’s so cold, you don’t need it.”

Thermal performance tests, or testing water temperature, is an excellent way for

UNDERAPPRECIATED: Often located far from the main action, cooling towers are often overlooked, until they become the limiting factor in hot summer conditions. PHOTO: SUSANNE RETKA SCHILL, BBI INTERNATIONAL

w w w . n a i s i n c . c o m • 1 - 8 0 0 - 8 6 6 - 6 2 4 7

Additional Services Include:Hydro Blasting from 10K to 40K • Vacuum Services • Dry Ice Blasting • Grit Blasting

Fugitive Dust Remediation / Foam Blasting • Hydro Excavating / Demolition

With 23 locations around the country we canoffer a wide range of services including:

Chemical Circulation on the shell side of Evaporators; �is hasproven to be bene�cial by increasing e�ciency through better heat

transfer thus reducing overall energy costs.

COOLING TOWERS

producers to identify cooling tower prob-lems, Foster says. It’s like going to the doc-tor for a regular checkup. A thermal per-formance test can set a baseline for how a cooling tower is operating and help deter-mine if it is meeting its original thermal de-sign parameters.

In Sight, In Mind Hollendieck, Jakel and Foster all stress

the importance of regular cooling tower inspections. Different types of inspections should be performed yearly, monthly and sometimes even weekly. Unfortunately, the reality is that many cooling tower operators simply aren’t doing this. Foster estimated it was as high as 80 or 90 percent. “People just don’t put that cooling tower on a priority list,” he says. “Until it breaks and then they will do anything to get it up and running.”

In some ways, Foster understands why cooling tower inspections have fallen through the cracks. He points to the many cutbacks across all types of industries. “Years ago, plants used to have a guy that was in charge of the tower, that’s all he did,”

he says. “Now, that person has 16 other roles.”

Still, Foster urged cooling tower opera-tors to put a preventative maintenance pro-gram in place. At least once a year, the struc-ture, including mechanical equipment and internals, should be thoroughly inspected. “You’ve got to get inside, because you really can’t tell what’s going on when it’s operat-ing,” he says.

He also recommends monthly walk-around inspections to look, listen and feel for problems. One thing operators should watch for is unequal water flow in the air inlets, which can signal an internal problem. Hearing abnormal noises or feeling exces-sive vibration can point to a pending me-chanical failure. “Like with your car when you hear it clank and clunk, it’s not sup-posed to do that,” Foster says. “Same thing with a cooling tower.”

Jakel also talked about the importance of inspecting water flow and distribution, including periodic visual checks and more extensive checks during maintenance shut downs. He noted that setting water diffus-

ers too fine also can cause issues. “This will be evident by excessive misting of water out the top of the tower,” he says. “Some or very little misting is common, but not rain.”

Inlet screens, which prevent debris from entering pumps, should be inspected and cleaned weekly, Jakel adds. If debris en-ters the water system it can cause multiple problems, including plugging and lowered efficiency. “If the screens get plugged up the water will back up in the tower basin and can overflow,” he says. “A high basin water level is usually an indication that the screens need to be pulled and cleaned.”

Author: Holly Jessen Freelance Writer

[email protected]


TEAM LEAD: Bryan Tracy, CEO of White Dog Labs, led the team that discovered a clostridia species that converts C5, C6 sugars and carbon dioxide into ethanol.PHOTO: WHITE DOG LABS


SUGAR Plus CO2

TECHNOLOGY

Talking with Bryan Tracy about the underlying science for White Dog Lab Inc.’s technology is an immersion into the molecular level of carbon accounting while simultane-ously taking a 30,000-foot view of the challenge of replac-ing petroleum with renewables.

As co-founder and CEO, Tracy leads the White Dog Labs team that has devel-oped fermentation technologies trademarked MixoFerm and MixoFermPlus. Tracy describes it as the fermentation technology of the future based on a clostridia micro-organism that consumes both C5 and C6 sugars and the subsequent CO2 produced to make ethanol or, if genetically modified, other chemicals.

Clostridia fermentations are not new, having achieved commercial scale a century ago to produce acetone, butanol and ethanol. In World War I, the British ability to manufacture gunpowder was hampered by German control of calcium acetate mines, the primary source of acetone for cordite gunpowder. A major breakthrough came with Chaim Weizmann’s isolation of a clostridia strain for ABE fermentation (acetone, butanol, ethanol). The process was scaled up quickly, taking over a distillery north of London to supply the British army. Limited fermentation yields, however, ultimately meant the process didn’t compete well with cheaper petroleum sources for those chemicals in succeeding decades.

A microorganism found capable of mixotrophic fermentation converts carbon from both sugar and gas into ethanol. By Susanne Retka Schill

Equals More Ethanol

The biggest challenge in competing with pet-rochemicals is the limitation in mass yield, Tracy explains. Traditional ethanol fermentations require 2 tons of sugar to make 1 ton of ethanol, a 50 percent yield. This is because sugar has a lot of oxygen, and to dispose of the unneeded oxygen, CO2 gas is generated and released. Thus for every molecule of ethanol produced, one molecule of CO2 is produced and released. The quest for cel-lulosic ethanol has focused on modifying yeasts or finding organisms to convert C5 sugars as well as C6, but the same mass yield limitation still holds.

A second approach taken by companies like LanzaTech, Coskata and IneosBio utilizes clostrid-ia species to consume syngas to produce ethanol or other chemicals. “Carbon monoxide and hydro-gen have a tremendous amount of electrons on a per carbon basis that makes them very good feed-stocks to convert to ethanol at very high carbon ef-ficiency,” Tracy says. That, of course, requires a lot of energy to turn biomass into syngas and, once again, the fossil feedstock would win out because shale gas methane currently is the most inexpen-sive feedstock.

The core discovery made by Tracy’s team at White Dog Lab is a clostridia capable of do-ing both—a mixotroph. Clostridia are natural soil

RESEARCH DIRECTORS: Randy Phillips, director of fermentation technology, left, and Shawn Jones, director of micro and molecular biology, have worked with CEO Bryan Tracy, center, on developing White Dog Lab technology. PHOTO: WHITE DOG LABS

When you’ll head to cellulosic ethanol you’ll want to de-risk your fermentation process. CelluXTM is Leaf’s bioengineered yeast with proven results in operating second generation ethanol plants. Pioneers chose CelluX™ in their fermentation operations, so should you. Because when it comes to reliability, performance and yield, CelluX™ makes the difference.

reliability performance yield

Grap

hik

desi

gn i

mar

ierio

.fr

www.lesaffreadvancedfermentations.com

TECHNOLOGY


organisms, Tracy explains, “responsible for fixing CO2 into organic compounds, particu-larly acetic acid, which other organisms feed off. This is one of the most primordial ap-proaches of fixing CO2 from the atmosphere and putting it into organic material for other organisms.” The MixoFerm process and the MixoFermPlus process, in which extra energy is added in the form of hydrogen gas, can in-crease the mass yield of a sugar fermentation by about 50 percent, so instead of 2 tons of sugar making 1 ton of ethanol, more than 1.5 tons of ethanol can be produced.

Adding Energy Tracy dives deeper into molecular chem-

istry to explain the importance of adding ener-gy, while once again relating that to the big pic-ture. “We’re trying through a biological, sugar feedstock approach to replace petrochemicals and fuels from petroleum, natural gas and coal. These are carbon compounds that are highly reduced—there’s very little oxygen in oil, and lots of hydrogen for every carbon. In the past 100 years, our entire petrochemical industry has developed with these reduced chemicals.”

“Now we want to replace petroleum with sugar,” he says. To get the sort of base chemi-cals the petrochemical industry has spent a century developing—ethylene, propylene, butene, butadiene, isoproponal, acetone—the first step is to reduce the oxygen, which re-quires energy. “The bioeconomy may never come to massive scale fruition for petrochemi-cal replacement unless you’re able to marry up an approach where you get energy into a sugar fermentation. That is the missing link,” Tracy says. Biochemical production economics are hampered by poor mass yields with a few ex-

ceptions, such as three acids—lactic, citric and succinic. “Those three are at commercial scale or developing the commercial markets today because they are highly oxidized chemicals—they have just as much or more oxygen in them per carbon as sugar has, so the mass yields are very high—often 100 percent. But those can-not replace the majority of petrochemicals and they can’t be used as a fuel.”

“We want to make a bioeconomy in a world in which the input is not compatible with the output, unless you add energy into the system,” Tracy says. Some microorgan-

50 | Ethanol Producer Magazine | JULY 2016HACKER

CHASING THE EVER-NIMBLE

isms acquire energy through photosynthesis, which is the mechanism algae developers are tapping into, while some microorganisms fi x gas using chemical energy. By adding chemical energy—hydrogen molecules with their freely available electrons—the organism can convert even more of the carbon in the MixoFerm-Plus process, boosting mass yields of ethanol to over 70 percent.

The clostridia produce ethanol natively, Tracy says, which would be an advantage if a fi rst-generation corn ethanol plant were to consider converting from yeast fermentation.

Using a nongenetically modifi ed organism would be helpful in getting a generally regard-ed as safe (GRAS) designation, which would be necessary for the distillers grains coproduct to be legally sold as feed. “There is nothing harmful about these clostridium,” Tracy says. “You would have to do the trials admittedly, but the protein content and amino acid con-tent compared to yeast is actually very good.” Getting recognized as GRAS is a lengthy pro-cess, however, and not likely to be done unless there is some momentum behind it. On the positive side, being able to turn the CO2 into

ethanol would greatly improve ethanol’s green-house gas impacts.

Other synergies exist with second-gener-ation ethanol. “With 2G ethanol, we can im-prove operating expenses and capital costs,” Tracy says. In conversations with ethanol producers, he says current estimates put con-ventional dry-grind capital cost for a new corn plant at $3 per gallon of capacity and second-generation capital costs at about $10 per gal-lon. “Not to criticize it, it’s a more complicated process and a new technology,” Tracy says. “The learning curve is going to be climbed.” He acknowledges White Dog Labs will have a similar learning curve, but current estimates for capital costs for its technology are about $6 or $7 per gallon. One advantage to the new process would be providing an alternative use for the lignin coproduct. Rather than burning the lignin for steam or electrical generation—both relatively low-cost in the U.S.—syngas from lignin could be used in the MixoFerm-Plus process and produce more ethanol, a higher-value product.

Commercialization PlansGiven current market dynamics and eco-

nomics, White Dog Labs is focusing on ac-etone as the fi rst chemical to commercialize, explains investor and executive chairman Sass Somekh. His son, Talli Somekh, is co-founder of White Dog Labs and an executive board member. The pair have fi nanced the project privately since forming White Dog Labs to purchase Elcriton, a spin-out from the Uni-versity of Delaware led by Tracy that focused on genetic engineering and organism develop-ment. The elder Somekh, who has been named to the Silicon Valley Engineering Hall of Fame, recently retired from a 30-year executive career in the semiconductor equipment industry. He describes his son as being a serial entrepreneur with a social conscience who has successfully launched a software company aimed at helping nonprofi t organizations. “Nine years ago, the two of us said we need to do our part to help the world reduce its dependence on fossil fu-els,” Somekh continues. “I started a company to make a new TV technology—organic light emitting diodes for fl exible screens. My son started a computing security company.” With both companies established and operating on their own, the focus has been turned to White Dog Labs.

TECHNOLOGY


Being family-financed, White Dog Labs has operated in stealth mode, Sass Somekh says. “We think of ourselves as industrial tech-nology 2.0, where we’re a very efficient, frugal company. We’re very resourceful, trying to get the same accomplishment but without raising a lot of money that maybe five or 10 years ago, before the global recession, was available for these new startups.”

White Dog Labs has designed, built and is operating an integrated demonstration fa-cility in Delaware that includes an 18,000 liter fermenter and a 6,000 liter-per-hour liquid-to-liquid extraction (LLE) column and distillation tower. When initially working with biobutanol, the company developed a novel, economical LLE extraction process for separating buta-nol from the fermentation broth. Ethanol and acetone can be extracted with conventional distillation technology. Given current market conditions, White Dog Labs is focused on ac-etone and isopropanol (IPA) production, with demonstrated improvements in fermentation yields of about 50 percent using the Mixo-Ferm process compared to a traditional sugar-only fermentation.

Readying to launch publicly, the team of researchers has had peer-reviewed papers pub-lished on its work, and is looking forward to a paper to be published in a prominent journal this summer. In May, White Dog Labs was named among a group of six projects to re-ceive up to $10 million in funding through the DOE Bioenergy Technology Office “to de-velop renewable and cost-competitive biofuels from nonfood biomass feedstocks by reducing the technical risk associated with potentially breakthrough approaches and technologies for investors.”

Plans are to build a 15,000 ton per year plant (5 MMgy) to produce acetone and IPA for the high end pharma and personal care markets that require no petroleum contamina-tion. The feedstock would be over-the-fence dextrose purchased from an existing corn wet mill. Target startup is for 2018. A longer-term plan is to start production in 2020 at a 75,000 ton per year (25 MMgy) acetone-IPA plant. The company has completed the initial design of the $150 million facility and applied for a U.S. DOE loan. It has passed Part 1 of the ap-plication process and been invited to submit the final Part 2. Sites in Minnesota and South Dakota are under consideration and a letter of

intent for acetone offtake is in place with a ma-jor chemical company interested in reducing its carbon footprint. A preliminary life-cycle analysis of the corn-based acetone field-to-customer greenhouse gas emissions indicates a 154 percent reduction when compared to petroleum-based acetone.

Somekh is excited to go public with White Dog Lab’s project development. “This is the next step to bring fermentation to a much higher level of efficiency,” he says. For ethanol, improvements have become incremental, but the company’s technology could boost yields

from 50 percent ethanol out of a ton of sugar, he says, to more than 70 percent. “This would be a quantum jump.”

Author: Susanne Retka SchillManaging Editor, Ethanol Producer Magazine

[email protected]

TECHNOLOGY

©2016 Lallemand Biofuels & Distilled Spirits. All rights reserved.

Since day one, Lallemand Biofuels & Distilled Spirits has been the driver behind many modern ethanol fermentation advancements. No other company has delivered more technological breakthroughs to help make ethanol production efficient and profitable.

Our customer partners fuel our pursuit of innovation. We reward these partnerships by offering the industry’s highest quality products, service and educational resources.

As writers of The Alcohol Textbook and organizers of The Alcohol School, we have established newindustry standards. Through our innovation we’ve changed the game to your advantage.

Contact us today at +1-866-342-7026 or www.lbds.com.

Montréal | Sept. 11-16, 2016Register at

www.lbds.com

TRUSTED PERFORMANCELoadout/Offload Skids• Proven performance

• Prepackaged and factory tested for quick installation

• Components tailored to your application

• Flow rates up to 1,500 gallons per minute

• Truck and railcar configurations

(800) 992-8981 westmor-ind.com [email protected]

Calibrations• Largest prover fleet in the midwest

• Calibrate your meters as close to zero as possible

Service• Trusted since 1964

• Technicians and trucks equipped to keep you operating

• Teams committed to repair and replace meters to keep your operation running

©2016 Lallemand Biofuels & Distilled Spirits. All rights reserved.

Since day one, Lallemand Biofuels & Distilled Spirits has been the driver behind many modern ethanol fermentation advancements. No other company has delivered more technological breakthroughs to help make ethanol production efficient and profitable.

Our customer partners fuel our pursuit of innovation. We reward these partnerships by offering the industry’s highest quality products, service and educational resources.

As writers of The Alcohol Textbook and organizers of The Alcohol School, we have established newindustry standards. Through our innovation we’ve changed the game to your advantage.

Contact us today at +1-866-342-7026 or www.lbds.com.

Montréal | Sept. 11-16, 2016Register at

www.lbds.com


High-definition images provide views of previously inaccessible areas. By Andrew Ledlie

INSPECTION

Evaporators, which consume a tremendous amount of energy to drive off water and increase the solids levels in the syrup, are criti-cal to the operation of an ethanol plant. Given their importance to the ethanol production process and the plant’s bottom line, plant managers invest substantial time and money to clean the evaporators and ensure that they are operating at peak capacity and efficiency. Among the traditional tools in their arsenals are hydroblasting, scale inhibitors,

clean-in-place (CIP) programs or pH control to address scale issues.

However, plant managers often have questioned the efficacy of hydroblasting and other measures to maximize the cleanliness of the evaporators. The answers to their ques-tions are becoming much clearer with the use of video borescopes to evaluate the interiors of evaporators.

A video borescope is an optical device consisting of a flexible tube with a video screen on one end and a high-definition camera and light on the other. Using the tube, the camera and light can be fed deep into inaccessible ar-

eas, making it possible to capture video or still images. Video borescoping technology is used in applications ranging from sewer repairs to chiller inspections to medical surgeries.

Video borescoping technology, so far, has been applied only sparingly in ethanol plants, but that is beginning to change. Solenis, for example, has been providing this service to fuel ethanol plants as a way to demonstrate the effectiveness of its Polystabil scale inhibitors and to evaluate the plant’s other scale control initiatives.

Ethanol plant managers also are taking advantage of borescoping technology to assess

Video Borescoping Technology Adds New Dimension to Scale Control

CONTRIBUTION: The claims and statements made in this article belong exclusively to the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ethanol Producer Magazine or its advertisers. All questions pertaining to this article should be directed to the author(s).

PINPOINTING PROBLEMS: Trained technicians using high quality borescopes can evaluate the success of hydroblasting an evaporator and identify areas requiring more attention. PHOTO: SOLENIS

the efficacy of hydroblasting when the evapo-rators are opened for routine maintenance. For example, after two days of hydroblasting evaporators at an ethanol plant in Indiana, a visual evaluation determined that the tubes were clean. However, when a borescope was lowered into the tubes, significant scale build-up was found at a depth of 8 feet requiring additional hydroblasting to rectify the situation.

Maximizing Borescoping

The value of video borescoping can be maximized with thorough preparation and planning. Plant managers who institute a bore-scoping program get the best results when they implement a plan.

Plant managers, for example, should keep organized records of when shutdowns oc-cur, the condition of each evaporator and the amount of time spent hydroblasting, as well as any process changes designed to prevent scale formation. Managers should hire a pro-fessional who has experience with video bore-scope inspections, using a high-quality bore-scope that produces high-definition images and is long enough to scope the tube’s length. Another important part of the planning pro-cess is to coordinate the timing of the video

INSPECTION

WATER TECHNOLOGIES

Questions to Evaluate, Improve Clean-in-Place ProcessesProgressive ethanol plant managers regularly evaluate their clean-in-place (CIP) process-es and develop a game plan for improvement. There are a number of questions to ask during these evaluations, including:

• How much time is spent overall and on each step of the CIP process? Is each step receiv-ing the appropriate amount of time to do a thorough job or are adjustments necessary?

• Are the temperatures of cleaning solutions optimal, given that some deposits dissolve better at higher temperatures than others?

• Are the flow dynamics effective? Is the velocity of the cleaning solution sufficient to break up deposits? Is the cleaning solution flowing in the right direction to attack hard-to-find areas? Is there sufficient turbulence to lift and move foulants? Each of these variables will impact the effectiveness of the cleaning process.

• Is the chemistry being efficiently and effectively used? Various acids and caustics, in different concentrations, will deliver different results.

• Have various adjunct chemistries, which reduce the amount of basic chemicals being used, been explored as a way to reduce cost?

• How often is CIP necessary to maximize plant efficiency and throughput and to minimize plant downtime?


borescoping with the company performing the hydroblasting, ensuring the borescoping tech-nician has access to the evaporators when they are cool enough for the scope to take clear im-ages without fogging up.

Meanwhile, plant managers should build time into the schedule to reblast any trouble spots identified during the borescoping and should ensure that the video borescope tech-nician understands required safety procedures and employees’ standards. The standards must be in line with the standards of the plant and the hydroblasting team. Safety considerations include high temperatures and steam when the evaporators are opened and the need for a per-mit if the borescope technician has to enter a confined space to conduct the inspection.

Another key to successful borescoping is being in agreement with the borescope techni-cian on the format of the report and where videos can be archived for easy access during the next inspection. The report should, at a minimum, include a statement of the units in-spected, a description of what was viewed and borescoping video or picture files.

Comprehensive Scale Control

While video borescoping is the latest tech-nology advance in scale control, it is only one element of a program designed to minimize down time and maximize ethanol plant effi-ciency. Plant managers need to consistently use a CIP process, in addition to taking advantage of available technologies that are necessary to control other types of foulants, which are not only found in evaporators, but can also build up in heat exchangers, tanks and piping in an ethanol plant.

One approach is to continuously apply a scale inhibitor chemistry to prevent or slow the development of certain deposits in the evapo-rators. In many cases, the scale inhibitor will al-ter the structure of the deposits that do form, making them much easier and less expensive to remove.

The return on investment in these pre-ventative chemical solutions can be significant. This is borne out by the dramatic differences in evaporators that have been treated with a scale inhibitor and those that have not.

How does this transfer to the bottom line? In one plant where sulfuric acid was used to adjust the pH to reduce scaling, the modest addition of a chemical inhibitor reduced sul-

INSPECTION

Premium service is professional service. �at’s why we hire people like Mike. He is dedicated to providing the highest quality service and results, every time. When you work with Premium, you work with professionals who live up to our name.

MEETPROFESSIONAL

. Hibbing, MN • Dubuque, IA • Tracy, MN

• Dry Ice Blasting

• Hydroblasting

• Industrial Vacuuming

• Sandblasting

• Slurry Blasting

• Sponge Blasting

• Surface Chemical Cleaning

• Confined Space Rescue

• Tube Bundle and Heat Exchanger Cleaning

O T H E R W I S E K N O W N A S

(888) 549 1869

BORESCOPING TECHNOLOGY: Ethanol plant managers increasingly are using borescopes to assess the efficacy of scale control programs. PHOTO: SOLENIS


furic acid and subsequent hydroblasting costs by more than 50 percent, each.

At a time when efficient and effective production processes are critical to profitabil-ity, optimizing a scale control program can pay huge dividends in terms of energy sav-ings, reduced labor expense, less downtime for cleaning and lower costs for the chemi-cals used in the overall scale control program. There are numerous options available to help plant managers understand and improve the scale buildup situation in their operations, including preventative chemical solutions and the use of video borescopes. All that is needed are commitment and organization by ethanol plant managers and technology providers who understand the scale control chemistry and can suggest process alterations to maximize results.

Author: Andrew Ledlie Biorefining marketing manager, Solenis

289-682-8025 [email protected]

Contributing Author: Paul Shepperd Biorefining technical manager, Solenis

610-745-1414 [email protected].

INSPECTION

HIGH DEFINITION: A borescope inserted into tubes, right, provides high-definition images of inaccessible areas. Views of treated and untreated evaporators, left, show the dramatic impact scale inhibitors can have.PHOTO: SOLENIS


OUTSOURCING: As a way to eliminate complexity in an already complicated process, some safety departments are outsourcing to a single, combined safety service provider that can deliver the gamut of safety-related products and services.PHOTO: DXP

Single source for safety-related products and services can reduce complexity and cost of planned STOs.By Chris McKinnon

SAFETY

Simplifying Safety During Planned Shutdowns



Planned shutdowns, turn-arounds and outages (STOs) of-ten are scheduled for preventative maintenance and new equipment installation that must be per-formed to keep an ethanol plant running and in regulatory compli-ance. To minimize production downtime, this work must be completed within a tight time frame. As such, STOs often are feats of engineering, planning and coordination, work that begins many months, even years, before the event.

Safety is at the top of the list during any planned shutdown. To prevent injury or loss of life, reduce liability and keep insurance rates in check, safety departments must provide the required safety training, products and services that will ensure that all on-site personnel and company assets are protected throughout the operation.

“Safety comes first,” says Clay Sharpe, Power Plant Field Services safety manager. “Our crews are trained in safety measures for the work they perform, whether a scheduled outage or an emergency repair. It is our philos-ophy to make every effort to ensure that po-tential accidents never happen. We begin every shift with a plan to work safely.” Power Plant Services is a turnkey, aftermarket manufactur-er and service provider to the ethanol, power generation, refineries, steel and chemical in-dustries. PPS performs emergency work as well as planned outages throughout the world.

Managing all that encompasses “safety” for an STO, however, is often a feat of its own.

During an STO, a typical ethanol plant can see its ranks swell by dozens of additional workers, depending on the plant’s size and the work being done. Safety departments and con-tractors providing turnkey services must prop-erly equip, train and provide rescue and stand-by emergency services. This often requires managing multiple vendors of safety products and services as well as workers who are not fa-miliar with the facility or its processes, yet are performing challenging, even high-risk tasks.

To eliminate a point of complexity and coordination in an already complicated pro-cess, some ethanol plant safety departments and equipment service contractors are out-sourcing to a single, combined safety service

provider that can deliver the gamut of safety-related products and services.

The benefit of this one-stop-shop ap-proach for a planned shutdown is the single point of coordination, reduction in facility personnel required to manage the safety effort, access to extensive safety expertise and techni-cal knowledge, potential cost savings on basic and more advanced personal protective equip-ment (PPE) and ability to respond quickly to unexpected situations or emergencies.

Safety FirstDespite the focus on speedy return-to-

service, plants that have participated in planned shutdowns will attest that the primary empha-sis is not how fast the work is completed, but rather ensuring the safety of all involved. This is not mere lip service, but the prime direc-tive, even if that means going over budget or delaying the project. “Safety is number one,” says Kevin Nadolski, safety director at Duke & Duke Services. “Well before any of the work starts, the project managers are holding

safety meetings and orienting employees on safety. This occurs both before and during the project, with managers reviewing daily reports about how many personnel are working, what they are doing and if any are hurt, they want to know exactly what happened.”

As safety director, Nadolski has utilized a number of PPE providers and safety service companies during his career. Duke & Duke Services provides installation and maintenance of conveyor systems, bulk handling equip-ment, presses, cranes, robotics and other au-tomated machinery, often used during STOs at ethanol facilities. He acknowledges that the concept of a single, combined safety service provider is novel in an industry where sup-pliers generally keep to well-defined market segments with minimal overlap. Large PPE providers, for example, offer catalogs with thousands of products, but rarely offer safety services and vice versa.

As a PPFS safety manager, the field ser-vices affiliate of PPS, Sharpe has a high aware-ness of the risks that exist in field services,

SAFETY


SAFETY

when crews of workers travel to plants across the U.S and abroad. Outages typically involve disassembly, inspection, component repair or replacement and then reassembly of equipment.

“The type of work we perform in the field is often potentially dangerous,” Sharpe says. We have many methods we can choose from to reduce the possibility of injury to our workers. First, we attempt to eliminate the hazard. If that is not possible, we re-sort to controls on the work processes and directing various types of safety equipment to be used.”

Outsourcing SafetyIn some cases PPFS will outsource spe-

cific services from a vendor. “This is gener-ally a service we contract on an as-needed basis,” Sharpe says. “And we need to know they will provide qualified workers who are fully aware of high-risk situations and have the equipment and expertise to handle an emergency.”

Sharpe says PPFS recently outsourced a portion of its safety project to DXP Safety Services. “We contracted DXP to provide safety services for a confined space situa-tion, which is a hazardous location where people possibly could get trapped,” Sharpe explains. “In confined space situations, you are sometimes required to have attendants and rescue teams with specialized equip-ment. DXP’s rescue teams are specialized, such as high-angle rescue and rope rescue. They had every possible scenario covered.”

DXP Services is a multinational com-pany that has grown significantly while ag-gressively pursuing new acquisitions. The company now operates as a single provider of combined safety products and services for plant turnarounds. In addition to an ex-tensive catalog of PPE items, the company maintains a large asset base of equipment including powered air trailers, supplied air trailers, emergency showers, eye wash equip-ment, maintenance-repair-operations-pro-duction trailers, fire trucks and ambulances.

COVERING ALL SCENARIOS: Specialized rescue teams can help in proper safety planning for confined space situations that sometimes require specialized equipment and training for scenarios such as high-angle rescue and rope rescue.PHOTO: DXP


SAFETY

DXP also offers a comprehensive list of services, including safety training and super-vision, confined space attendants and rescue teams, high angle rescue teams, rope rescue, gas detection, respiratory fit testing, audiomet-ric testing, industrial hygiene, industrial medical services, fall protection and repair services.

In 2015, Nadolski estimated he out-sourced more than a dozen times for onsite safety supervision, emergency response, con-fined space attendants and supplied air trailers. He also utilized these specialty companies to train employees that must complete annual confined space training. “What I appreciate most is that when they send their guys out for rescue work, I know they are well-trained,” says Nadolski. “I still spot check them and ask them ‘what do you do if this happens?’ ques-tions, but they know it right off the bat. I don’t always get that with other safety services.”

Single-Source BenefitsThe benefits of a one-stop-shop ap-

proach to safety begin well before the STO.

As part of the preplanning, a safety advisor from a combined service provider meets with facility safety and maintenance personnel to learn about their existing procedures and pro-cesses. For shorter projects this meeting can be two to four weeks beforehand or for a more complex project, 12 to 18 months in advance.

The safety advisor then evaluates and monitors safety hazards and control strategies to ensure compliance with the facility’s safety rules, policies, programs, criteria and proce-dures as well as all governmental regulations.

Given the unique requirements of each facility, there are no one-size-fits-all safety plans, so each project is client-specific. In ad-dition, the scope of involvement can be scaled from a single worker to a complete program for the entire scope of the STO.

Another benefit to this approach is the ability to react to unexpected situations or emergencies. Although a tremendous amount of planning goes into a planned shutdown there inevitably are situations, requirements for specialized equipment, unexpected air

quality issues and even injuries that can leave safety personnel scrambling. With the breadth and scope of its expertise, a combined safety services company can tap into its resources quickly to resolve the situation.

In this regard, Nadolski says he relies on these single-service safety companies to serve as an extra pair of “eyes” on the ground when he is not at the site. “We have been in situa-tions where we have needed something safety-related on the spot and DXP was able to take care of it for us.”

The single-service safety providers he has used has performed as a team of experts with a full complement of safety equipment and ex-pertise that provided a single-source, turnkey service, Sharpe says. “They were very profes-sional and took care of the project without requiring supervision, which was exactly what we needed,” he says. “I’m very pleased with their professional attitude and services.”

Author: Chris McKinnon Vice president, DXP Safety Services

[email protected] 713-996-4700

�e Sumitomo Cyclo® 6000 o�ers unparalleled advantages over other inline drives available in the market today. Its unique cycloidal design allows the Cyclo® 6000 to withstand shock loads exceeding 500% of its ratings. �e Cyclo® 6000 provides exceptional performance, reliability, and long life under the most severe applications.

Sumitomo’s Hansen P4 vertical gearbox is available in 16 di�erent sizes, with up to 819,000 Nm output torque. P4 o�ers single and multi-stages and has reduction ratios between 6.3:1 and 500:1. Housings are available with parallel or right-angle sha�s.

To see a complete listing of our products, visit us at www.sumitomodrive.com

Cyclo® 6000

Hansen P4Multi-Stage

DRIVING ETHANOL


Ethanol producers continu-ally struggle with fouling of pro-cess equipment and how best to remove it. The accumulation of deposits on equipment surfaces and in pipes can be ex-tremely detrimental to the overall efficiency of an ethanol plant. Contamination can cripple operations, while fouling and scale formation significantly can impair equipment function. The bioconversion of corn introduces a unique combination of feedstock, processing aids and yeast, all with unique chemical properties and processing steps that include wide temperature, pH and pressure fluctuations. This results in re-

sidual organic and inorganic materials that col-lect and become points for contamination and scaling that interfere with the regular function of equipment, such as distillation columns, evaporators and heat exchangers. A well-de-signed clean in place (CIP) regimen between fermentations and shutdowns can decrease plant downtime significantly and mean the dif-ference between profitability and loss.

Clean in place systems often include in some combination rinsing with water, a caus-tic cleaning step and an acid wash. Every plant is unique with different engineering, corn, processes, age, piping, water quality, size, loca-tion, management and operators and, thus, has unique considerations and requirements when

designing the most cost-effective CIP system. Selecting the right chemistries and optimizing the number of steps, concentrations, residence times and temperatures throughout can have a substantial economic impact.

Alternative CIP chemicals can provide significant advantages, if the plant is capable of handling the innovative products. By retool-ing older plants with improved equipment and process lines, plant managers can realize com-patibility with new CIP chemistry innovations and achieve greater productivity and an attrac-tive return on investment.

Sodium hydroxide has been used ex-tensively as the caustic cleaner in ethanol and other industrial plants due to its low cost and

Removing scale with alternative chemistry offers multiple advantages.By Brian Hoskins

New Acid Solution Improves CIP Programs

SANITATION


PHOTO: VERSCHELDEN PHOTOGRAPHY


SANITATION

ability to hydrolyze proteins. It is well known as an effective cleaning agent for the removal of organic deposits and to combat biofouling; however, its use is not without a number of challenges for ethanol producers. If the con-centration is too low, then the ethanol plants will have exacerbated problems with contami-nation. If the plants use too much, foaming could become an issue due to saponification, and the accumulation of sodium throughout the process can inhibit yeast and ultimately lower production efficiency.

The sheer volume plants use as they strive to remain clean and run efficiently makes caus-tic a major expenditure on the balance sheets for plant managers. While caustic is effective for protein removal, the extreme heat condi-tions in heat exchangers and evaporators lead

to a very hard, resistant scale that contains denatured protein. This protein scale com-bined with mineral content may make caustic cleaning less desirable than one might initially think. A different CIP strategy might reduce the amount required or the frequency of use and could translate into considerable savings for plant managers. Could caustic cleaning be eliminated as a step in some cycles? Could it be eliminated altogether?

The need for a strong acid wash as at least one cycle of a CIP system traditionally has been recommended for the removal of miner-al deposits. Sulfamic acid historically has been selected for this application in ethanol plants; however, it is typically sold as a solid and re-quires careful handling and personal protective equipment, including a respirator, and it is not

approved for use in the production of animal feed. With the enactment of the Food Safety Modernization Act, the increased scrutiny on the horizon by the Food and Drug Adminis-tration related to the production of food and feed presents an opportunity to reevaluate what chemicals are currently utilized, how they are used and if a more effective, safer com-bination also could improve plant economics overall.

Strong Acid AlternativeSome ethanol plant managers have rec-

ognized the tremendous cost high sodium levels from caustic exacts on their processes and have replaced both their sulfamic acid wash and entire caustic CIP program with a strong acid wash CIP program for all pieces

Thermal RefractorySolutions & Maintenance

Give the Thermal team a call today!612-751-2010

www.thermalrefractory.com

We are your Ethanol Refractory Experts! We know your energy center and can provide superior results

on your RTO, TO, Boiler, or Dryer. We have installers based from 3 different locations to provide a fast

& cost effective solution for your plant. We understand the importance of your operation and will

provide the results you need to be running smooth.

SOURCE: BASF


SANITATION

of equipment including fermenters, heat ex-changers and evaporators. These plants enjoy low contamination rates, low sodium levels and increased plant uptime. Also, there is a significant improvement in overall plant water balance due to improved cleaning of evapo-rators. These plant managers have found that making the capital investment required to en-sure all CIP process lines are made of stain-less steel is an investment that pays for itself in better overall plant operation. An obvious important driver of this desirable outcome is also the selection of the best acid for the task.

BASF has introduced its trademarked Lutropur MSA as a high-purity methanesul-fonic acid (MSA) alternative chemistry to tra-ditional CIP solutions. Methanesulfonic acid is a strong, odorless, organic acid that is readily biodegradable. MSA is a natural component of the ecosystem. Due to the biological deg-radation of biomass in the oceans, dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is released and is responsible for the typical odor of seawater. At ocean temperature, DMS is volatile so it rises into the atmosphere where, under the influence of ultraviolet radiation and oxygen, it is oxidized to form methanesulfonic acid. The acid is re-turned to the earth in rainfall where it is natu-rally degraded by aerobic methyltrophic bacte-ria near the earth’s surface to CO2, sulfate and water. The naturally occurring salts of MSA dissolve in ground water near the surface. The bacteria that control the degradation processes belong to the lowest stage of the food web

SOURCE: BASF


SANITATION

within the ecological system, after phytoplankton. The new formation of biomass as a result of this process is the beginning of a natural ecological cycle illustrated in Figure 1.

Scale AttackThe most frequently formed scale inside ethanol and other in-

dustrial plants are calcium salts—calcium carbonates, sulfates, oxalates (also known as beer stone) and phosphates. Coupled with phytate and other salts as part of a complex system, these scales can have a dramat-ic impact on equipment’s ability to function optimally. The formation of such scales creates ridges and pockets where organic residues build and bacteria thrive. These contamination points often are responsible for bacterial contamination that shows up in increased lactic and ace-tic acid levels in fermentation. Plants often compensate with the use of antibiotics, but addressing the symptom and not the cause can be extremely costly. Developing a thoughtful scale-removal strategy will play an important role in a comprehensive approach to improved op-erations, along with optimizing processes to reduce fouling in the first place.

Lutropur MSA is highly effective at scale removal, particularly cal-cium carbonate scales, when compared to many other acids including sulfamic and phosphoric acid, as shown in Figure 2.

Another important consideration for acids and their use in etha-nol plants is corrosiveness. While there are strong acids such as hydro-chloric acid that are capable of dissolving a wide spectrum of scale in the plant, the corrosive pitting effect on metal surfaces is highly undesirable. Lutropur MSA, by contrast, is a strong acid able to ef-ficiently dissolve scales while showing a remarkably lower degree of corrosiveness towards metals.

From an industrial hygiene perspective, Lutropur MSA is superior to sulfamic, hydrochloric and nitric acids. It is a liquid and does not de-compose in water, unlike solid sulfamic acid. It has no odor and does not produce toxic and corrosive fumes, unlike hydrochloric and nitric acids, and it easily can be diluted in existing acid-wash systems. There-fore, as a result of its nonoxidizing nature, the high solubility of its salts, the absence of odor and the fact that it is readily biodegradable, Lutropur MSA can be considered a safer and more effective alternative to sulfamic and other acids for use in ethanol plants. It is a friendly acid for production personnel and equipment.

Front Range Energy in Windsor, Colorado, is an example of an ethanol plant that has adopted an acid-based CIP approach. Plant manager Phil Turchen explains, “I can, without a doubt, confirm in-creased cleaning properties with Lutropur MSA in fermentation tanks, yeast propagation, plate frame exchangers, and evaporators. We have a longer batch life for our plant main CIP, which is now every two weeks as opposed to weekly.”

Ethanol producers have many options from which to choose as they reflect on what CIP system will be best for their operations. Safety is paramount. Today’s economic environment demands we look for new ways to increase efficiency and improve operations. A robust CIP program not only can improve plant safety, equipment performance and lifetime, but also minimize downtime while boosting productivity and ultimately, profitability.

Author: Brian HoskinsProduct Manager, Grain Processing, BASF

[email protected]

CommunityActive Participation in the Communities Where We Live and Work.

PartnershipConnecting Your Supply to the Domestic and Global Marketplace.

CommitmentSupported by the Reliability and Financial Security of Louis Dreyfus Commodities.

Creating Opportunity Since 1851.

LDCom.com


Preventing Production Problemsin the Lab Increasing biofuel demand will require next-generation laboratory software solutions.BY TRISH MEEK

SOFTWARE


SOFTWARE

Reduced oil prices have been bad news for oil industry profits. It hasn’t been easy for renewables, either. De-spite dampened enthusiasm for renewables overall, innovation continues in areas such as biofuel production.

In late March, United Airlines announced that it will use biofuel to help power flights running between Los Angeles and San Fran-cisco, with future plans to expand to all flights operating out of LAX. A small step indeed, but a positive sign that biofuel production re-mains viable for the future.

Now that United publicly has committed to biofuels, it must be able to rely on a steady supply. In this case, it will come from a Los Angeles refinery operated by AltAir Fuels. The total mixture will be 30 percent biofuel, sourced from feedstocks that include algae, and 70 percent traditional jet fuel.

The United announcement is part of a groundswell of activity across the transporta-tion sector. From air to sea, to rail to over-the-road, major consumers of fuel are eyeing more affordable solutions that also comply with mandates related to clean air. The view appears positive and the biofuels industry should be and is thinking about a future of higher production volume and greater quality. That means production efficiency and pro-ductivity, which puts biofuel labs back on the spot to demonstrate their critical enterprise value.

As biofuel producers refocus on a more optimistic future, they will turn their atten-tion back to the complexity of their process-es. With the potential for increased demand comes the increased risk of production fail-ure. Batch failure is magnified when pro-duction accelerates, so labs will increasingly rely on new analytical technologies and new

software solutions that enable them to more closely monitor, analyze and report. This ranges from gas chromatography (GC), ion chromatography and fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy to inductively cou-pled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), all of which generate volumes of data.

Attend Export Exchange Detroit, Michigan, Oct. 24-26, 2016

Network and attend educational seminars with nearly 200 international grain buyers and more than 300 U.S. suppliers at this premier international trade conference.

For more information and to register, visit ExportExchange.org.

Sponsored by

GROW YOUR NETWORK. GROW YOUR BUSINESS.GROW YOUR NETWORK. GROW YOUR BUSINESS.

Integrating LIMS and CDS allows the lab to effectively remove eight manual processes, leaving it with one streamlined automated process – leaving only one manual process – putting the sample into the instrument and hitting the “GO” button.


Volumes of data can soon lead to moun-tains of challenges, from daily lab operations to more complex pattern recognition that could expose risks, such as batch failure. Without a solution such as a laboratory in-formation management system (LIMS), these problems quickly become impossible to sur-mount.

The LIMS brings discipline to an envi-ronment with many complex, moving parts. Enterprise-level LIMS, designed for integra-tion across the lab and with other enterprise systems, seamlessly can connect and work in

harmony with other systems, such as a chro-matography data system (CDS). In the next-generation biofuels lab, a CDS is critical to ensuring the quality of biofuels, which has everything to do with adherence to required gas and ion chromatographic methods.

As modern biofuel laboratories select suitable equipment for specific analyses, they commonly choose from a variety of chroma-tography instruments from different manu-facturers. Using a manufacturer-specific CDS for each instrument can lead to complications regarding efficiency, data handling, training,

validation and compliance. The selection of a CDS with multivendor instrument control, including acquisition and data handling of MS instruments, overcomes these challenges. In addition, data storage and handling can be de-coupled from instrument control and central-ized, a so-called enterprise of the client-server system, increasing the security and accessibility of the data. With all data from instruments in the same format and one common report for results, regardless of the instrument that was used to generate them, the efficiency gains and productivity increases are considerable.

A major requirement in production labo-ratories is ensuring the highest instrument uptime to produce results at all times of the day. When running in a client-server system, keeping the laboratory fully up and running during a network outage, planned or not, is a big challenge. Therefore, a CDS should al-low operation independent of the network, so that even when the network is down, the CDS keeps instruments running, data acces-sible for processing, and even allows creation and running of new sequences, ensuring 24/7 laboratory uptime.

By guiding technicians through the ex-ecution of analytical methods, the CDS drives the laboratory processes related to all aspects of a chromatographic analysis. Some CDS provide an even higher level of automation by encapsulating all of the unique aspects of a chromatography workflow, like instrument control and data processing parameters, cor-rect injection order and reporting parameters, and guiding the operator through the minimal number of steps required to run it. The op-erator simply selects an instrument, specifies the number of samples and the starting vial position in the autosampler, and begins the analysis. The software then runs the chro-matograph, processes the data, and produces final results.

For example, ASTM D6584 and EN 14105, the main quantitative quality control methods for the determination of glycerol and glycerides in pure biodiesel by GC. When biodiesel (B100) is derived from vegetable oils, such as sunflower and palm oil, glycerol is created as a byproduct. Mono-, di- and triglyc-erides, created as intermediates or unreacted starting material, also occur. These methods test for the presence of glycerol and glycer-ides in the final product, which is important

SOFTWARE

because of their negative impact on fuel ef-ficiency and engine performance.

While both of these analyses differ in small ways, there are some common elements. Both methods require complex and time-consuming sample and calibration standard preparation. Samples are run in duplicate and compared to determine analytical precision. With only a few clicks in the CDS, users can create and start a run and data analysis accord-ing to the requirements in the ASTM methods is automatically performed.

The next step in the chromatography process, data processing and evaluation, is the most time-consuming step. Even with all data processing parameters correctly set up in the automated chromatography workflow, tech-nicians need to decide if a sample requires re-analyzing, based on the results. Advanced features, such as intelligent run control, al-low users to setup system suitability tests with pass/fail criteria, testing for acceptance criteria of the calibrations, checks and sam-ples. The software can then respond to the outcome of these tests, such as failed sample replicates or standards and without user inter-vention, take predefined, immediate action,

such as reinjecting the samples, performing a dilution or aborting the run. As this can even happen overnight, productivity is increased and a source for errors removed.

Final results can be sent directly to the LIMS. A seamless integration between the CDS and LIMS ensures a quick response to all quality results. Any samples that fail to meet the specifications established by ASTM and EN are flagged as out of specification in the LIMS and preventative action can be taken. This level of automation across the laboratory process ensures product quality and boosts laboratory productivity.

Conclusion

A LIMS is a proven workhorse in the biofuels industry, especially because it is uniquely suited to highly distributed lab envi-ronments with multiple instrument platforms, workflows and standard operating proce-dures. Although instruments perform discrete tasks and generate data for specific purposes, data integration is vital and a LIMS is critical to achieving an end-to-end flow of informa-tion across the lab and across all processes. To ensure efficient, safe and profitable biofuels

production, labs must be able to support con-tinuous process monitoring and manage the data outputs in a way that is useful to stake-holders across the enterprise when, where and how they need it.

Third-generation biofuel production processes are dynamic and complex. It can take weeks for feedstock to break down and finding a problem at the end is costly. Labs must be able to use even more sensitive ana-lytical instruments and multilayer software in-frastructure that enables instrument, lab- and enterprise-level insight and decision-making across the production process.

Author: Trish MeetSenior Manager, Product Marketing Informatics

& Chromatography SoftwareThermo Fisher Scientific

Co-Author: Barbara van Cann

Software Product Marketing Specialist, Informatics and Chromatography Software Company

Thermo Fisher Scientific www.thermofisher.com


SOFTWARE


In football, when things are not going well, coaches often are heard to say “It’s our job to coach ‘em up,” meaning we need to get them smarter.

In our world of ethanol, that certainly is the case as we need to get people smarter and “coach up” the public, media and policymakers as to the real story about our product. Perhaps nothing is more important in this regard than the role ethanol can play in improving air quality and protecting public health, which is a core message of the Urban Air Initiative.

We know that gasoline is a toxic soup of pollutants and its harmful impacts are masked by the U.S. EPA’s outdated models and error-filled testing procedures. We also know that replacing the most harmful components of gasoline with ethanol can protect public health while providing superior engine performance.

But we can’t score a touchdown, if they won't let us on the field. Well, that is exactly what we face in regard to the blend wall and the policy roadblocks EPA has put in our way to keep higher ethanol blends out of the market. For ethanol to achieve its highest potential of being a source of clean octane, we need not only to get on the field via the fuel pool, but we need the cars and engines to be allowed to use these higher blends.

Step one in this process is to dispel the myths and correct the misinformation that surrounds ethanol. On our website FixOurFuel.com, Urban Air lays out the health problems connected to gasoline and explains how these issues can be reduced greatly by improving the quality of gasoline with ethanol. We are addressing many questions regarding engine performance at our other website, FuelingTheTruth.com. Both of these sites, indeed, will coach ‘em up—Fix Our Fuel in terms of improving fuel quality and Fueling the Truth with engine and performance questions and answers as well as educational videos.

If the public, fueled by misinformation, believes that ethanol presents a problem for everything from their beloved automobile to their lawn mower, we will continue to struggle to gain market share. Correcting information and setting the record straight through these types of accurate websites will help break down the blend wall.

But we are not going to truly see ethanol reach its full potential on volumes powering only lawn equipment or small engines. The Holy

Grail is the 140 billion gallon-per-year motor fuel market and using higher blends in conventional vehicles. Glacial Lakes Energy, with support from ICM and others, is promoting an innovative program, the E30 Challenge. Residents in Watertown, South Dakota, are running conventional automobiles, not flex fuel, on 30 percent ethanol blends to dispel the myth that we need specialized vehicles to run this clean, high-performing fuel.

The emissions and performance data being collected will allow us to take the first steps in getting automakers and the EPA to acknowledge that a 10 percent or even 15 percent limit in conventional automobiles is a myth. We can achieve air quality benefits and meet ever-increasing fuel economy requirements by taking advantage of ethanol’s low carbon and high octane qualities.

UAI participated in a panel of experts at the Fuel Ethanol Workshop in June that confirmed everything we know to be true. We have a public health threat on our hands. The good news is that a former General Motors engineering executive sang the praises of E30 as a means of meeting automaker criteria for future fuels and lowering emissions.

We will continue to “coach ‘em up.” If information is power, then we have the high ground, and it is incumbent on us to spread the word about the dangers and health risks of emissions from today's petroleum-based gasoline. Whether it’s the alarming links to asthma and respiratory disease, or the even more alarming linkage to low birth weight and neurological ailments, the data is there. And we will continue to “coach ‘em up” on mid-level blends of ethanol, which is a practical, feasible solution that we can begin to use immediately without damage to engines or a sacrifice in power or performance.

So, all I can say is “Put Me In Coach.”

Author: David VanderGriendCEO, ICM Inc., President, Urban Air Initiative

[email protected]

Helping Tell Ethanol’s Real Story

CLEARING THE AIR

By Dave VanderGriend

For years, we’ve been told that cellulosic ethanol is a “fantasy fuel.” And it is.

So we’ve spent a decade planning, researching, and working hard to make that fantasy a reality.

And now it’s going to change the world. For real.

®

Advanced BiofuelsPOET-DSM.COM

I S M A D E H E R E .


EPM MARKETPLACE

�nd it online at

directory.ethanolproducer.com

d it li t

BROWSE CATEGORIES BROWSE COMPANIES

directory.yyy ethanolpppproducer.co

BROWSEBROWSE CATEGORIESCATEGORIES BROWSEBROWSE COMPANIE

maintenance services| FIND

One FREE Listing per Company

��nnnnnnnnddddddd it onlinnnnneeeee aaaaaaaatttttttt

Adhesive compounds withstand:• Acids • Bases • Organic Solvents

[email protected] ∙ +1.201.343.8983

GAIN MAXIMUM EXPOSURE &CONTACT INFO

Contact us today for more information [email protected] or 866-746-8385.

L i v e + O n D e m a n dwww.EthanolProducer.com/pages/webinarWEBINAR SERIES

� Website� All emails� Advertisements� Webinar page on

EthanolProducer.com� OnDemand material� Attendee Information

Sponsor Featured On:

d f

Copyright ©2016 DuPont. All rights reserved.The DuPont Oval Logo and DuPont are registered trademarks or trademarks of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company or its affiliates.

INCREASE YIELDS, REDUCE SUGARS: YOUR RECIPE FOR SUCCESS

Introducing the SYNERXIA® Fermentation System, robust bioengineered yeast paired with uniquely superior enzymes designed to deliver consistently high yield. �is innovative pair o�ers up to 2% additional ethanol, with up to 20% reduced sugars at drop. And when you trial the SYNERXIA® Fermentation System, you’ll receive full end-to-end technical support to optimize for your unique operation – because we’re here to help you succeed.

If you’re ready to stop sending over 20,000,000 pounds of sugar out the door with your DDGs, contact your DuPont representative or call 1-800-847-5311.

SYNERXIA®

FERMENTATIONSYSTEM

2016 July Ethanol Producer Magazine

Documents

Transcript of 2016 July Ethanol Producer Magazine