2016 Employee Survey Results DRAFT · About EID Engagement Employees feel valued by their...
Transcript of 2016 Employee Survey Results DRAFT · About EID Engagement Employees feel valued by their...
2016 Employee Survey Results
6/2/2016 2Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Mission, Vision, and Values
MissionProviding excellence in facilities and services for our university community.
VisionAn inclusive and diverse team working together to provide exceptional service for our university community.
Core Values• People Centered• Stewardship• Integrity• Innovation and Discovery• Safety
6/2/2016 3Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
About EIDEngagementEmployees feel valued by their organization, find pride and personal meaning in their work, and are willing to go above and beyond for their employer.
InclusionEmployees have a sense of belonging and of being respected for who they are and as a contributing member of the team.
DiversityEmployees possess the range of human qualities that impact and influence how people are perceived and how they behave, including (but not limited to) age, gender, race, ethnicity, color, physical and mental attributes, sexual orientation, marital status, spirituality, education, values and beliefs.
6/2/2016 4Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Survey Methods Conducted by the UW Survey Center on behalf of the Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration (VCFA).
Electronic and paper surveys. Paper surveys were offered in English, Spanish, Hmong, Tibetan, and Mandarin Chinese.
All survey responses were confidential. Only demographic data was collected. Results are grouped by division, department, and unit.
6/2/2016 5Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Survey Purpose Gather your opinions about your job, work unit, supervisors, and peers.
Understand the issues that are important to you at work.
Improve relationships between supervisors and co‐workers.
Assess strengths, identify gaps, and help ensure that FP&M has high levels of employee satisfaction.
Provide a way to evaluate the success of current EID initiatives and help focus future EID efforts.
6/2/2016 6Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Survey Response Rates
Year Distributed Completed Resp. Rate
2012 1211 482 40%
2014 1117 949 85%
2016 1146 806 70%
6/2/2016 7Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
40%
85%
70%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%2012 2014 2016
Results by Section
Environment of Work Unit (Q1a‐l) Relationship with Co‐workers (Q2a‐d) Tools & Opportunities (Q3a‐j) Work Unit (Q4a‐d) Supervisors in Work Unit (Q5a‐j) Overall Satisfaction (Q6a‐b) Other Questions (Q7‐Q9)
6/2/2016 8Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Mean Scores by Section
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
2012 2014 2016
Environment of the Work Unit Relationship with Co‐Workers Tools and Opportunities
Work Unit Supervisors in Work Unit Overall Satisfaction
6/2/2016 9Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Environment of Work Unit
68.5%
71.5%
75.4%
16.6%
22.6%
13.5%
14.6%
5.9%
11.1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
6/2/2016 13Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Relationship with Co‐workers
6/2/2016 14Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
69.3%
76.2%
75.2%
20.3%
18.5%
15.7%
10.8%
5.2%
9.1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Tools & Opportunities
6/2/2016 15Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
56.9%
53.6%
59.2%
22.9%
36.3%
20.1%
19.0%
10.2%
20.7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Work Unit
6/2/2016 16Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
75.3%
80.0%
79.2%
15.8%
16.0%
13.7%
8.0%
4.0%
7.1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Supervisors in Work Unit
6/2/2016 17Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
65.3%
61.2%
70.2%
20.4%
25.9%
17.2%
14.1%
12.9%
12.6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Overall Satisfaction
6/2/2016 18Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
72.5%
69.0%
74.4%
15.5%
20.7%
15.2%
11.5%
10.3%
10.4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Considering Leaving FP&M?27.6% of FP&M employees are considering leaving the division in the next year.
6/2/2016 19Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
To retire 18.0%
To take another job at UW‐Madison 25.4%
To take another job outside UW‐Madison 37.5%
Other plans 19.1%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%
Satisfaction with Work ExperienceWhich factor greatly affects your satisfaction with your work experience?
6/2/2016 20Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Pay/Benefits 32.1%
Work environment 20.8%
Immediate supervisor 10.3%
Work variety 9.3%
Training opportunities 4.2%
Advancement opportunities 6.0%
Experience working at UW‐Madison 8.5%
Other 8.7%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Composite Scales
Engagement Diversity and Inclusion Best Places to Work Questions Respect‐related Questions
6/2/2016 21Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Engagement
6/2/2016 22Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
35.0%
36.3%
54.5%
48.0%
47.6%
35.5%
17.0%
16.0%
10.0%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
Engaged Somewhat Engaged Not Engaged
Diversity & Inclusion
6/2/2016 23Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
48.0%
47.5%
43.2%
40.0%
40.3%
44.4%
13.0%
12.2%
12.4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
High Medium Low
Best Places to Work
6/2/2016 24Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
70.0%
68.7%
72.9%
17.0%
18.1%
15.7%
12.0%
13.2%
11.4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
I would recommend my unit as a good place to work.
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Best Places to Work
6/2/2016 25Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
74.0%
66.6%
73.9%
15.0%
17.9%
14.9%
11.0%
15.5%
11.3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
Considering everything, I am satisfied with my job.
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Best Places to Work
6/2/2016 26Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
71.0%
68.1%
74.9%
16.0%
17.4%
15.6%
12.0%
14.4%
9.5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
Considering everything, I am satisfied with my work unit.
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Respect‐related Questions
6/2/2016 27Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
73.0%
71.7%
77.5%
15.0%
16.3%
13.1%
12.0%
11.9%
9.4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
I am treated with respect at work.
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Respect‐related Questions
6/2/2016 28Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
63.0%
68.0%
71.2%
22.0%
19.4%
15.8%
15.0%
12.5%
13.0%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
In my unit, co‐workers value and respect each other.
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
Respect‐related Questions
6/2/2016 29Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
76.0%
73.7%
78.4%
14.0%
15.1%
13.3%
10.0%
11.2%
8.3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2012
2014
2016
My supervisor respects me and values my work.
Favorable Neutral Unfavorable
StrengthsNotable Areas of Improvement Environment of Work Unit (Q1a‐l) Supervisors in Work Unit (Q5a‐j) Overall Satisfaction (Q6a‐b) Engagement (Composite) Respect‐related questions (Q1l, Q2b, Q5e)
6/2/2016 30Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
StrengthsFive Highest Rated Questions in 2016 (1‐5 Scale) Q4C: The work I do is meaningful to me – 4.15 Q3B: I know what is expected of me on the job – 4.13 Q1C: My work unit is welcoming to all people regardless of
gender – 4.10 Q4B: My work unit produces high‐quality products and services –
4.07 Q1J: My work unit feels safe to me – 4.05
6/2/2016 31Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
WeaknessesOpportunities for Improvement Relationship with Co‐workers (Q2a‐d) Tools and Opportunities (Q3a‐j) Work Unit (Q4a‐d) Diversity and Inclusion (Composite)
6/2/2016 32Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
WeaknessesFive Lowest Rated Questions in 2016 (1‐5 Scale) Q3G: I am satisfied with my pay/compensation – 2.29 Q3J: It is clear to me what I need to learn to be adequately
prepared for promotional opportunities – 3.17 Q3E: Recognition is based on performance in my work unit – 3.35 Q3F: I am satisfied with the recognition I receive for my work –
3.43 Q5G: Overall, I am satisfied with the managers/leaders above my
immediate supervisor – 3.45
6/2/2016 33Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
Summary Results have continued to improve since 2012. There are still opportunities for improvement. FP&M will continue to work on areas that present opportunities for improvement.
The FP&M divisional EID plan will be revised before July 1, 2016 to address these areas of opportunity.
6/2/2016 34Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON