2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

46
Title slide Drop you card off in the front/back 1

Transcript of 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

Page 1: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

Title  slide    Drop  you  card  off  in  the  front/back  

1  

Page 2: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

Both  -­‐  Welcome  slide  Introduce  us:  Who,  what  we  do,  where  we  work  Similar  presentaBon  in  2013  at  Regional  Conference  -­‐  people  thought  it  was  about  making  money  for  themselves.    OurvDefiniBon  of  sponsorship  for  this  presentaBon:  Match  students  with  products  or  services  that  they  need  or  want  and  would  purchase  with  or  without  you  in  exchange  for  in-­‐kind  goods  or  services,  or  for  cash.        

2  

Page 3: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  –  Who  is  in  the  room?  Raise  of  hands:  Public,  vs.  Private,  vs.  For-­‐Profit  SSAO,  MId-­‐level,  new  professionals,  students  4  year,  2  year,  online  only?  SA  Sponsorship  currently    

3  

Page 4: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  -­‐  This  is  not  rocket  science  

4  

Page 5: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  -­‐    

5  

Page 6: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

6  

Page 7: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

7  

Page 8: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  

8  

Page 9: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR    Source:  State  Higher  EducaBon  ExecuBve  Officers  AssociaBon    Red  line  is  public  enrollment  Blue  is  state  support  per  student  Green  is  tuiBon  per  FTE      From  1988  to  2013,  FTE  enrollment  at  public  insBtuBons  of  higher  educaBon  increased  from  7.3  million  to  11.3  million.  The  all-­‐Bme  peak  enrollment  occurred  in  2011,  and  then  declined  slightly  in  2012  and  2013.      Cost  of  Living  Adjustment  (COLA)  to  account  for  cost  of  living  differences  among  the  states;  •    Enrollment  Mix  Index  (EMI)  to  adjust  for  differences  in  the  mix  of  enrollment  and  costs  among  types  of  insBtuBons  with  different  costs  across  the  states;  and  •    Higher  EducaBon  Cost  Adjustment  (HECA)  to  adjust  for  inflaBon  over  Bme.    

9  

Page 10: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR    This  is  the  average  percent  of  total  revenue  that  is  just  tuiBon  across  the  US  

10  

Page 11: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR    What  percentage  that  tuiBon  makes  up  of  average  public  university  budget  by  state.    

11  

Page 12: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  Source:  Center  on  Budget  and  Policy  PrioriBes:  hhp://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=4135    

12  

Page 13: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  Aker  adjusBng  for  inflaBon:  Forty-­‐eight  states  —  all  except  Alaska  and  North  Dakota  —  are  spending  less  per  student  than  they  did  before  the  recession.[1]  States  cut  funding  deeply  aker  the  recession.    The  average  state  is  spending  $2,026  or  23  percent  less  per  student  than  before  the  recession.    

13  

Page 14: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  

14  

Page 15: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

15  

Page 16: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR    What  does  this  mean?    Increased  tuiBon.    Public  colleges  and  universiBes  across  the  country  have  increased  tuiBon  to  compensate  for  declining  state  funding  and  rising  costs.    Annual  published  tuiBon  at  four-­‐year  public  colleges  has  risen  by  $1,936,  or  28  percent,  since  the  2007-­‐08  school  year,  aker  adjusBng  for  inflaBon.    These  sharp  increases  in  tuiBon  have  accelerated  longer-­‐term  trends  of  reducing  college  affordability  and  shiking  costs  from  states  to  students.        Cut  spending,  oken  in  ways  that  may  diminish  access  and  quality  and  jeopardize  outcomes.    TuiBon  increases  have  compensated  for  only  part  of  the  revenue  loss  resulBng  from  state  funding  cuts.    Public  colleges  and  universiBes  have  cut  faculty  posiBons,  eliminated  course  offerings,  closed  campuses,  shut  computer  labs,  and  reduced  library  services,  among  other  cuts.    For  example,  since  2008,  the  University  of  North  Carolina  at  Chapel  Hill  has  eliminated  493  posiBons,  cut  16,000  course  seats,  increased  class  sizes,  cut  its  centrally  supported  computer  labs  from  seven  to  three,  and  eliminated  two  distance  educaBon  centers.  

   

16  

Page 17: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

17  

Page 18: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  ConBnuum  of  Sponsorships  

18  

Page 19: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  –  Ethics  of  Sponsorships  Ethics  goes  both  ways  NODA  example:    NODA  Ethical  Standards(NaBonal  AssociaBon  for  OrientaBon,  TransiBon,  RetenBon)  In  relaBonships  with  corporate  partners  or  sponsors,  OrientaBon  professionals  shall:  

 •  Honor  any/all  contractual  agreements  entered  into  with  such  partnerships,    •  PrioriBze  the  educaBonal  outcomes  of  students,  and  refrain  

from  engaging  in  partnerships  which  are  solely  or  primarily  for  the  purpose  of  sales/markeBng  of  a  product  or  service,  

 •  Clearly  communicate  the  intent,  anBcipated  outcomes,  and  parameters  of  the  relaBonship.    You  know  your  campus,  its  cultural,  its  mission,  and  its  values?  What  will  your  students/  faculty/  staff/  parents/  alumni  tolerate?  

Alcohol  and  tobacco  companies  Marijuana  dispensaries/head  shops  Strip  clubs  Evil  corporaBons  Other  universiBes  Companies  that  make  students  sign  a  contract  

Credit  card  Cell  phone  

Beverage  companies  where  exclusive  pouring  rights  exist  Religious  or  poliBcal  organizaBons  Pyramid  schemes    

 

19  

Page 20: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  –  Where  to  find  vendors    Natural  partners  already  exist  

Where  do  students  frequent?  Food,  retail,  etc.  

What  vendors  do  you  already  have  on  campus?;  maybe  ask  for  $500/year  in  scholarship  dollars;  require  that  company  post  all  entry  level  jobs  with  career  center  and  ahend  career  fair.    Who  is  in  your  campus  neighborhood?  

Draw  a  radius  around  campus  Which  alumni  own  businesses?  What  companies  are  located  near  your  campus?  Who  are  the  top  employers  of  your  graduates?  

 

20  

Page 21: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  –  group  work  

21  

Page 22: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  –  report  from  the  floor  

22  

Page 23: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  –  Goals  of  company    Increased  business  Access  to  a  generally  younger  demographic    

(in  other  words,  clients  for  life)  You  are  helping  them  navigate  systems,  bureaucracy,  poliBcs,  procedures,  and  contracts  -­‐  goal  is  to  maximize  the  relaBonship  by  being  a  central  touchpoint,  leverage  events,  and  access  to  students  across  mulBple  departments,  and  mulBple  events  Improving  their  brand  

23  

Page 24: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  –  ROI  What  do  you  have  to  sell?  Events  

OrientaBons  Engagement  fairs  Move-­‐in  

PublicaBons  Newslehers  Calendars  

T-­‐shirts  and  more    

24  

Page 25: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

25  

Page 26: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

26  

Page 27: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

27  

Page 28: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

28  

Page 29: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

29  

Page 30: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  

30  

Page 31: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR  

31  

Page 32: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

32  

Page 33: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

33  

Page 34: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

34  

Page 35: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

35  

Page 36: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR    Lesson  learned  –  scholarship  burger  remained,  but  other  items  have  pulled  back.  

36  

Page 37: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR    What  did  Kind  give  us?    5k  Kindbars  for  OrientaBon;  500  Kindbars  at  end  of  each  term;  Kindbars  for  division  events/meeBngs    What  did  we  give  Kind?  The  ability  to  place  their  product.  

37  

Page 38: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

JR    Be  sure  to  talk  about  flip  side  and  how  next  year,  we  didn’t  have  as  good  of  a  student.    

38  

Page 39: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

NR  

39  

Page 40: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

40  

Page 41: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

41  

Page 42: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

42  

Page 43: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

Both    Lessons  Learned    Joe’s  –  aker  first  year,  sBll  doing  scholarship  burger,  but  other  things  fizzled  because  they  were  geung  good  business.    Amazon.com  –  came  to  table  in  lobby  where  registraBon,  financial  aid,  and  student  accounts  were  held;  bookstore  got  angry  at  us,  registrar  got  angry  because  disrupBve  to  work  that  needed  to  be  done.  Ads  in  Commencement  Program  –  cheapens  the  look  and  feel  of  the  publicaBon;  do  you  really  want  that  ad  for  X  in  there  forever?  Good  selling  point,  but…    This  work  is  relaBonal  –  good  for  student  affairs    OkenBmes  a  unit  or  program  area  that  has  to  give  something  to  make  a  sponsorship  happen  is  not  the  beneficiary  

But,  a  rising  Bde  raises  all  ships  Higher  ed  Bme  is  like  molasses;  corporate  Bme  is  like  light  speed  Reduce  your  agreements  to  a  contract  or  memorandum  of  understanding    Work  in  concert  with  your  campus  Development  and  Fundraising  office  

43  

Page 44: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

44  

Page 45: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

45  

Page 46: 2015 NOLA NASPA Presentation

46