2014 NVT Results Steven Tilbrook; Rachel Thomson Kalyx Australia.

32
2014 NVT Results Steven Tilbrook; Rachel Thomson Kalyx Australia

Transcript of 2014 NVT Results Steven Tilbrook; Rachel Thomson Kalyx Australia.

2014 NVT ResultsSteven Tilbrook; Rachel ThomsonKalyx Australia

OverviewWhat is “Production Value PLUS” Season 2014: Regional SummaryPV Plus applied to NVTVariety ComparisonsNew Varieties

Production Value PLUS System

New methodology = Production Value PLUS System

Produces “Production Values” (PVs) in t/ha for all varieties for each environment (NVT year & site combination)

Basic definitions:

Variety PVs: are positive or negative differences relative to a base-line (PV = 0)

PV = 0 Reflects the average expected yield of all the varieties in the current NVT data set, if grown in that particular environment

PV-PLUS is available on NVT online via the

Yield App

Area Sown to Wheat Varieties

Mace Calingiri Wyalkatchem Yitpi Magenta Stiletto Cobra Corack Bonnie Rock Westonia0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

12/1313/1414/15

Area

sow

n to

Whe

at V

arie

ties %

Northern Snapshot of 2014

Best break since 1999 & 2012 then dry spell

Above average minimum temps

Hi temps & 22km/hr winds 24/7 for 2 weeks, yields suffered

Ideal harvest conditions

50

100

0

Game changing rains for some

Below to average Season

Rain

fall

(mm

)

Eneabba

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov0.0

15.0

30.0

45.0

60.0

75.0

90.0

105.0

sown 29/5

2014 Rainfall (mm) Average Rainfall (mm)

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

f(x) = 0.993029627216458 x + 0.111108217109095R² = 0.981806796009565f(x) = 0.996092119356155 x + 0.124735797871681R² = 0.977427218968546

CorackLinear (Corack)

Mace Yield (t/ha)

Co

rack

Yie

ld (

t/h

a)

86 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (42) WA NVT sites

Mace vs Corack

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

f(x) = 1.12815458315448 x − 0.242218865376699R² = 0.985494465557155f(x) = 0.993029627216458 x + 0.111108217109095R² = 0.981806796009565

MaceLinear (Mace)

Mace Yield (t/ha)

Co

bra

Yie

ld (

t/h

a)

86 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (42) WA NVT sites

Mace vs Cobra

Corack or Mace???

New main season (mid maturity) Varieties to watch…

Hydra APW: Bonnie Rock/ Strzelecki, mid season, good disease package, regional adaptability.Impress CL Plus APW: Very much a Wyalkatchem type. Great foliar package especially yellow spot, good grain size.

Emerging varieties

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

f(x) = 1.06484386486006 x + 0.000230774067878414R² = 0.984834742135063f(x) = 0.993029627216458 x + 0.111108217109095R² = 0.981806796009565

MaceLinear (Mace)

Mace Yield (t/ha)

Hyd

ra Y

ield

(t/

ha)

86 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (42) WA NVT sites

Mace vs Hydra

New Noodle VarietiesZEN: Calingiri/Wyalkatchem longer season,

watch stem rust. Supreme: Arrino derivative, shorter season,

expressive dwarf gene, good disease.

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

f(x) = 1.07958817735801 x − 0.134687756476917R² = 0.97203329375077f(x) = 1.03287867750647 x − 0.154039002808398R² = 0.977264816423965

Calingiri

Calingiri Yield (t/ha)

Zen

Yie

ld (

t/h

a)

83 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (39) WA NVT sites

Zen vs Calingiri

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

f(x) = 0.99156082362293 x + 0.0528773466617185R² = 0.982572499372847

f(x) = 1.03287867750647 x − 0.154039002808398R² = 0.977264816423965

Calingiri

Calingiri Yield (t/ha)

Su

pre

me

Yie

ld (

t/h

a)

83 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (39) WA NVT sites

Supreme vs Calingiri

Harper: Yitpi/Stylet derivative, Yield advantage over Yitpi (different phenology)Prefers a good finish (longer season)Watch yellow spot

Trojan: LPB00LR000041/Sentinal derivativeYield advantage over Yitpi (different phenology)Watch Yellow SpotRequires a good finish (longer finish

Long Season Varieties

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

f(x) = 1.08320146915949 x − 0.154281783055209R² = 0.978075469359233f(x) = 0.980253891760823 x − 0.0312953741868123R² = 0.975591779569406

YitpiLinear (Yitpi)

Yitpi Yield (t/ha)

Tro

jan

Yie

ld (

t/h

a)

56 trials sown in 2013 (14), 2014 (42) WA NVT sites

Trojan vs Yitpi

CLEARFIELD

2014 Barley NVT ResultsSteven Tillbrook; Rachel ThomsonKalyx Australia

IMI tolerant barley• Observe label timings for MRL’s• Scope CL Plus

– Very close to Buloke, head loss an issue. – Lower yielding than Hindmarsh.– Hindmarsh would have averaged a $70/ha greater return

in the NVT trials over the last 5 years. • New IMI tolerant varieties on the horizon (Intergrain)

Variety development• Flinders

– Accredited for malting– Good disease, longer season, yields well.

• La Trobe– Yields = Hindmarsh– Accredited for malting

• Compass– Malting accreditation due 2016, top of MET analysis, mid-maturity

similar to Commander.

Litmus update• Litmus recognised as having blue aleurone

– Only completely white aleurone varieties meet current standards

• Yield advantage on acid soils• Geraldton PZ has established a trial segregation for Litmus. • AEGIC have been commissioned by Barely Australia to

investigate market sensitivity to blue aleurone.

Key messages• Hindmarsh still the a good option • Awaiting market development of Flinders, La Trobe and

Compass. • Flinders and Compass are longer season may be suited to

Eneabba and Badgingarra area.• Malting varieties require more favourable premium to be

competitive with Hindmarsh.

Hybrids

RR$

44% Oil in 2014 Increased

Yields

Recognition and thanks to:

Grower co-operatorsGrower Group Staff

Kalyx StaffDini Ganesalingam: SAGI

Matu PeipiGRDCACAS

www.nvtonline.com.au