2014 Heavy Vehicle Charges Determination Draft RIS Appendix 1 ...
Transcript of 2014 Heavy Vehicle Charges Determination Draft RIS Appendix 1 ...
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 1
2014 Heavy Vehicle Charges Determination
Draft Regulation Impact Statement
Appendix I: Case Studies
November 2013
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 2
Notes to Case Studies
The case studies presented in this Appendix have been prepared to illustrate the possible financial
impacts of the Heavy Vehicle Charges options explored in the draft Heavy Vehicle Charges
Determination Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) on vehicle operators
Each case study represents a vehicle operating in a particular state or territory. The financial
implications of each Heavy Vehicle Charges option are compared against the Base Case applicable in
that particular state or territory. The Base Case is unique for Western Australia and the Northern
Territory. Therefore, the financial implications for operators in Western Australia and the Northern
Territory are not comparable to the financial implications that would exist for the same vehicle
operating in other states and territories.
Most case studies are based on information obtained from industry participants, some of whom have
chosen to remain anonymous.
In addition, NTC intends to release a calculator as part of the public consultation process that will
allow interested parties to estimate the possible financial impacts under each heavy vehicle charges
option based on their individual circumstances (vehicle class, yearly distance travelled, fuel
consumption).
Acknowledgements
The NTC acknowledges Matthew Bereni in preparing these case studies. The NTC thanks and acknowledges the significant assistance from:
TasFreight
DirectHaul
Garden Grove Haulage
Holcim Pty Ltd
Farragher Transport Group
Hanson
Single Transport Services
Boral Logistics
Wettenhall Logistics
Rod Pilon Transport
Day’s Transport & Logistics
Nolan’s Transport
Toll Linehaul & Fleet Services
Whiteline Transport
Cunderdin Transport Service
G & S Transport
Wildman River Stock Contractors
Centurion Transport
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 2
List of Case Studies
1. Tasmania, Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid trucks (GVM > 18 tonne), General freight haulage (TasFreight) 5
2. Northern Territory, Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid trucks, Fuel haul tankers (DirectHaul) 7
3. South Australia, Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid trucks (GVM>18.0 tonne), Dry bulk haulage (Garden Grove Haulage) 9
4. Victoria, Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid truck (GVM > 18 t), Dry bulk haulage (Holcim Pty Ltd) 11
5. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid trucks, General freight haulage and refrigerated goods (Farragher Transport Group) 13
6. New South Wales, Vehicle Class 11, truck and dog combinations (GCM>42.5 tonne), Dry bulk haulage (Hanson) 15
7. South Australia, Vehicle Class 11, Truck and dog combinations (GCM>42.5 tonne), Dry bulk haulage (Garden Grove Haulage) 17
8. Victoria, Vehicle Class 11, Truck and dog combinations (GCM>42.5 tonne) Dry bulk haulage (Holcim Pty Ltd) 19
9. Queensland, Vehicle Class 11, Truck and dog combinations (GCM>42.5 tonne), General freight haulage (Single Transport Services) 21
10. Interstate, Vehicle Class 11, Truck & dog combinations (GCM>42.5 t), Dry and liquid bulk haulage (Boral Logistics) 23
11. Queensland, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, Fuel haul tankers (DirectHaul) 25
12. Tasmania, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight haulage (TasFreight) 27
13. Victoria, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight and container cartage (Wettenhall Logistics) 29
14. New South Wales, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, Dry bulk haulage (Hanson) 31
15. Queensland, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight haulage (Single Transport Services) 33
16. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight haulage (Rod Pilon Transport) 35
17. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight haulage, refrigerated and dangerous goods (Day’s Transport & Logistics) 37
18. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, Refrigerated goods haulage (Nolan’s Transport) 39
19. Interstate, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, Dry and liquid bulk haulage (Boral Logistics) 41
20. Western Australia, Vehicle Class 17, B-doubles (<9axle rig), Refrigerated good haulage (anonymous) 43
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 3
21. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, General freight haulage and refrigerated goods (Farragher Transport Group) 45
22. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, General freight haulage, refrigerated and dangerous goods (Day’s Transport & Logistics) 47
23. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, Refrigerated goods haulage (Nolan’s Transport) 49
24. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, General freight haulage (Rod Pilon Transport) 51
25. Interstate, Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, General and express parcel freight, bulk, dangerous goods (Toll Linehaul and Fleet Services) 53
26. Victoria, Vehicle Class 18, 10-axle B-doubles, Container cartage (Wettenhall Logistics) 55
27. South Australia, Vehicle Class 19, B-triples, General freight (Whiteline Transport) 57
28. Western Australia, Vehicle Class 20, Pocket double road trains, Dry bulk and livestock – owner/driver (Cunderdin Transport Service) 59
29. Western Australia, Vehicle Class 20, Double road trains, Refrigerated goods haulage (anonymous) 61
30. South Australia, Vehicle Class 20, Double road trains, General freight (Whiteline Transport) 63
31. Northern Territory, Vehicle Class 21, triple road trains, Fuel haul tankers (DirectHaul) 65
32. Northern Territory, Vehicle Class 21, Triple road trains, Dry bulk haulage (G & S Transport) 67
33. Northern Territory, Vehicle Class 21, Triple road trains, General freight, liquid and dry bulk, dangerous goods and machinery (WRSC) 69
34. Western Australia, Vehicle Class 21, Triple road trains, General freight and refrigerated goods haulage (Centurion Transport) 71
35. Victoria, Vehicle Class 24, 2-axle buses (GVM>10.0t), Passenger transport (anonymous) 73
36. Queensland, Vehicle Class 25, 3-axle coaches, Passenger transport (anonymous) 75
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 4
Result snapshot
Updated
Status QuoOption A Option B Option C
1 Tas TasFreight 6 43,000 50.0 -3.5 -5.7 1.8 7.5
2 NT DirectHaul 6 32,000 43.0 -2.8 -5.0 2.6 8.4
3 SA Garden Grove Haulage 6 100,000 38.5 -4.3 -5.4 6.4 15.3
4 Vic Holcim Pty Ltd 6 90,000 40.0 -4.2 -5.4 6.2 15.0
5 Interst. Farragher Transport Group 6 53,000 32.0 -3.7 -5.6 3.1 9.7
6 NSW Hanson 11 130,000 65.0 -5.7 -2.0 1.0 3.0
7 SA Garden Grove Haulage 11 150,000 61.0 -5.7 -2.2 1.5 4.0
8 Vic Holcim Pty Ltd 11 90,000 55.0 -6.1 -0.6 -2.6 -4.4
9 Qld Single Transport Services 11 45,000 55.0 -6.7 1.3 -7.7 -15.0
10 Interst. Boral Logistics 11 90,000 55.5 -6.1 -0.7 -2.5 -4.3
11 Qld DirectHaul 16 103,000 53.5 -5.6 -7.7 -4.2 -1.7
12 Tas TasFreight 16 133,000 47.0 -5.5 -7.5 -3.0 0.2
13 Vic Wettenhall Logistics 16 100,000 55.6 -5.6 -7.7 -4.1 -1.5
14 NSW Hanson 16 111,000 65.0 -5.4 -7.3 -1.8 2.3
15 Qld Single Transport Services 16 50,000 50.0 -6.0 -9.2 -12.4 -15.2
16 Interst. Rod Pilon Transport 16 175,000 50.0 -5.3 -7.0 -0.2 4.8
17 Interst. Day's Transport & Logistics 16 180,000 48.0 -5.4 -7.0 -0.3 4.7
18 Interst. Nolan's Transport 16 260,000 45.5 -5.2 -6.6 1.9 8.3
19 Interst. Boral Logistics 16 120,000 51.3 -5.5 -7.5 -3.2 0.0
20 WA Anonymous 17 250,000 60.0 -0.8 1.2 6.3 10.0
21 Interst. Farragher Transport Group 18 250,000 58.0 -6.5 -6.3 -1.9 1.3
22 Interst. Day's Transport & Logistics 18 200,000 58.0 -6.8 -6.5 -3.8 -2.0
23 Interst. Nolan's Transport 18 260,000 55.6 -6.5 -6.3 -1.9 1.3
24 Interst. Rod Pilon Transport 18 185,000 65.0 -6.7 -6.4 -3.5 -1.4
25 Interst. Toll Linehaul & Fleet Services 18 350,000 58.2 -6.1 -6.0 0.7 5.7
26 Vic Wettenhall Logistics 18 150,000 66.7 -7.0 -6.6 -5.2 -4.3
27 SA Whiteline Transport 19 250,000 72.5 -6.8 -8.3 -3.3 0.3
28 WA Cunderdin Transport Service 20 55,000 146.0 -0.9 1.1 0.6 -0.1
29 WA Anonymous 20 300,000 75.0 -3.0 -2.3 5.3 11.1
30 SA Whiteline Transport 20 250,000 75.0 -6.0 -5.2 1.1 5.7
31 NT DirectHaul 21 207,000 95.0 -3.0 -3.2 2.6 7.0
32 NT G & S Transport 21 180,000 100.0 -2.9 -3.1 2.2 6.0
33 NT WRSC 21 100,000 90.9 -1.8 -1.8 -2.3 -3.0
34 WA Centurion Transport 21 200,000 72.0 -1.8 -1.9 1.6 4.1
35 Vic Anonymous 24 64,000 43.0 -3.4 -3.7 10.1 20.7
36 Qld Anonymous 25 25,500 33.3 -5.7 -4.5 -8.6 -12.0
# Operator Name Vehicle Class
Average
Distance
Travelled
(km per
annum)
Total yearly charge change compared to Base Case (%)
State/
Terr.
Average
Fuel Cons.
(L/100km)
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 5
1. Tasmania, Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid trucks (GVM > 18 tonne), General freight haulage (TasFreight)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Kerry Gibson, CEO of TasFreight. Tasfreight was
established at Latrobe near Devonport, Tasmania in May 1984 primarily to provide a fast and efficient
freight service between Tasmania and Melbourne. Originally geared to handle fresh fruit and
vegetables, Tasfreight now caters for all types of cargoes with the only exception being new furniture.
Tasfreight currently employs in excess of 200 permanent staff and over 40 subcontractors.
TasFreight operates rigid as well as articulated heavy vehicles. TasFreight revenue is predominately
obtained from operations undertaken by 3-axle rigid trucks with a GVM above 18 tonnes carrying
general freight. This case study focuses on this operation type.
Although Tasfreight is based in Tasmania, it operates a number of interstate routes in mainland
Australia (e.g. Melbourne to Sydney). About 99.9% of Tasfreight’s operations are on sealed roads.
Impact
Data collected for more than fifty 3-axle rigid trucks (GVM>18 tonne) operated by Tasfreight shows
that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 43,000 km and have an average
fuel consumption of 50.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 6
Compared to the Base Case in Tasmania,
the yearly registration charge for each 3-
axle rigid truck would on average:
Increase by $11 (+1.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $78 (-7.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $255 (-24.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $398 (-37.5%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Tasmania,
the yearly RUC for each 3-axle rigid truck
would on average:
Decrease by $173 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $187 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $341 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $748 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Tasmania,
the total yearly charge (RUC +
registration) for each 3-axle rigid truck
would on average:
Decrease by $163 (-3.5%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $265 (-5.7%) for
Option A
Increase by $86 (+1.8%) for
Option B
Increase by $350 (+7.5%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Compared to the Base Case, these vehicles would face a significant decrease in total yearly charges
under Option A. In contrast, under Options B and C, these vehicles would face a moderate to significant
increase in total yearly charges due to the magnitude of the RUC increase despite a decrease in
registration charge for this particular vehicle class.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 7
2. Northern Territory, Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid trucks, Fuel haul tankers (DirectHaul)
Operator profile
Directhaul is the appointed cartage contractor for a number of fuel distribution companies throughout
the Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia, delivering to a wide range
of commercial and retail customers as well as the company’s own operated fuel sites. Directhaul is
wholly owned subsidiary of Ausfuel Gull. Directhaul transport over 1 billion litres of fuel products each
ear. The Directhaul fleet comprises 75+ road trains, 200 trailers and over 120 dedicated team
members. Directhaul’s areas of operation are represented in the map below.
Directhaul operates 2-, 3-, and 4-axle rigid trucks, as well as 6-articulated trucks, B-doubles, double
road trains, triple road trains, and quadruple road trains. A significant proportion of Directhaul haulage
operations in NT is undertaken by 3-axle rigid trucks (GVM>18.0t) which are well adapted to local fuel
haulage operations in and around town. This case study will focus on fuel haulage operated by 3-axle
rigid trucks (GVM>18.0t).
Impact
Data collected for four 3-axle rigid trucks (GVM>18.0t) operating in NT shows that, on a yearly basis,
these vehicles travel an average distance of 32,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of
43.0 L/100km.
Source: www.directhaul.com.au
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 8
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these 3-axle rigid trucks would on
average:
Increase by $43 (+4.2%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $45 (-4.4%) for
Option A
Decrease by $223 (-21.7%) for
Option B
Decrease by $366 (-35.6%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
yearly RUC for each of these 3-axle rigid
trucks would on average:
Decrease by $176 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $190 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $347 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $760 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these 3-axle rigid trucks would
on average:
Decrease by $133 (-2.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $235 (-5.0%) for
Option A
Increase by $124 (+2.6%) for
Option B
Increase by $394 (+8.4%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
The increase in RUC being more significant than the decrease in registration charge for 3-axle rigid trucks
under Options B and C, the total charge for these vehicles for Options B and C will be higher than that of
the Base Case despite their reduced registration charge.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 9
3. South Australia, Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid trucks (GVM>18.0 tonne), Dry bulk haulage (Garden Grove Haulage)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Bradley Carraill, Managing Director of Garden Grove
Haulage. Garden Grove is a family owned and operated nursery, landscape and garden supplies
centre in Adelaide, South Australia. Garden Grove is one of the largest landscape supplies centres in
Australia.
Garden Grove has its own haulage department which manages a large range of bulk cartage
requirements, with a fleet of more than 100 heavy vehicles. Garden Grove Haulage operates locally
and to regional areas of South Australia along with Victoria and New South Wales. Garden Grove
Haulage transports a range of cargoes for its customers from garden products to grain, fertilisers,
manure and gravel.
It should be noted that 95% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads, the rest being on
unsealed roads.
Garden Grove Haulage mostly operates 3-axle rigid trucks and 4-axle dog trailers. However, Garden
Grove Haulage also operates several 3-axle tandem tippers (steer + bogey drive) which are the object
of this case study.
Impact
Data collected for nearly twenty 3-axle rigid trucks shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel
an average distance of 100,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 38.5 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 10
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Increase by $11 (+1.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $78 (-7.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $255 (-24.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $398 (-37.5%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $493 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $531 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $970 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $2,125 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $482 (-4.3%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $609 (-5.4%) for
Option A
Increase by $715 (+6.4%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,727 (+15.3%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Compared to the Base Case, these vehicles would face a significant decrease in total yearly charges
under Option A. In contrast, under Options B and C, these vehicles would face a significant increase in
total yearly charges due to the magnitude of the RUC increase despite a decrease in registration charge
for this vehicle type.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 11
4. Victoria, Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid truck (GVM > 18 t), Dry bulk haulage (Holcim Pty Ltd)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Paul Cowman, Regional Transport Manager Victoria of
Holcim Pty Ltd. In Australia, Holcim has been delivering construction materials for more than 90
years. Originally serving the industry under the well-known Readymix and Humes brands, Holcim now
continues to supply products including aggregate and sand, concrete, concrete pipe and products.
Holcim operates right across the Australian continent supplying concrete from a network of more than
200 concrete plants, 900 mixer trucks and mobile and on site facilities. Premixed concrete formed from
cement, aggregates, additives and water are delivered in specially designed transit mixers.
It should be noted that 90% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads.
Holcim mostly operates 3-axle rigid trucks and 4-axle dog trailers. However, Holcim also operates
several 3-axle rigid trucks (steer + bogey drive) which are the subjects of this case study.
Impact
Data collected for ten 3-axle rigid trucks (GVM > 18 t) shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles
travel an average distance of 90,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 40.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 12
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Increase by $11 (+1.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $78 (-7.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $255 (-24.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $398 (-37.5%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $461 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $497 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $907 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,987 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the total yearly charge (RUC +
registration) for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $450 (-4.2%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $574 (-5.4%) for
Option A
Increase by $652 (+6.2%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,589 (+15.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
The increase in RUC being more significant than the decrease in registration charge for 3-axle rigid trucks
under Options B and C, the total charge for these vehicles for Options B and C will be higher than that of
the Base Case despite their reduced registration charge.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 13
5. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 6, 3-axle rigid trucks, General freight haulage and refrigerated goods (Farragher Transport Group)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Dennis Roohan, National Fleet Maintenance Manager of
John Farragher Transport Group. Farragher was established in 1933 as a removal company in
Newcastle. The company is privately owned and managed by third generation owner John Farragher.
The operation has progressed to initially beverage distribution and specialised freight retail logistics
and now asset management 3PL and 4PL services.
Farragher Transport is a total supply chain solutions provider for the Australasian market. It supplies
“best practice” 3PL and 4PL logistical services with operations in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and
Newcastle with staff operating in every state of Australia and internationally in Hong Kong and
Shanghai (China).
About 98% of Farragher Transport’s haulage takes place on sealed roads.
Farragher Transport operates fifteen 3-axle rigid trucks which are the subjects of this case study. For
the needs of this case study, the following graphs will be produced using NSW registration charges as
the Farragher Group Head Office is based at the Cameron Park DC, 20km west of Newcastle.
Impact
Data collected for fifteen 3-axle rigid trucks (GVM>18.0t) operating interstate shows that, on a yearly
basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 53,000 km and have an average fuel consumption
of 32.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 14
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Increase by $11 (+1.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $78 (-7.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $255 (-24.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $398 (-37.5%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $217 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $234 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $427 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $936 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $206 (-3.7%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $312 (-5.6%) for
Option A
Increase by $172 (+3.1%) for
Option B
Increase by $538 (+9.7%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
The increase in RUC being more significant than the decrease in registration charge for 3-axle rigid trucks
under Options B and C, the total charge for these vehicles for Options B and C will be higher than that of
the Base Case despite their reduced registration charge.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 15
6. New South Wales, Vehicle Class 11, truck and dog combinations (GCM>42.5 tonne), Dry bulk haulage (Hanson)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Charlie Stoneman, Regional Logistics Manager of
Hanson. Hanson supplies heavy building materials to the construction industry. As well as its fleet of
concrete agitators and aggregate tippers, Hanson’s logistics network also features cement tankers, a
train and heavy-duty machinery including dump trucks, front-end loaders and face-shovels.
About 95% of Hanson’s transport operations in NSW are on sealed roads.
Most of Hanson’s dry bulk haulage operations in NSW are operated by 3-axle rigid trucks combined
with 3-axle dog trailers.
Impact
Data collected for roughly one hundred of these 3-axle rigid trucks & 3-axle dog trailers in NSW shows
that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 130,000 km and have an average
fuel consumption of 65.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 16
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each truck &
dog combination (GCM>42.5 tonne)
would on average:
Decrease by $722 (-8.0.%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $543 (+6.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,821 (-20.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,712 (-41.1%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $1,082 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,166 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $2,129 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $4,664 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $1,804 (-5.7%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $623 (-2.0%) for
Option A
Increase by $308 (+1.0%) for
Option B
Increase by $952 (+3.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Under Option A and compared to the Base Case, these vehicles would face a moderate decrease in total
yearly charges due to an increase in registration charge combined with a decreased RUC. In contrast,
under Options B and C, these vehicles would face a moderate increase in total yearly charges due to a
decrease in registration charge combined with an increased RUC.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 17
7. South Australia, Vehicle Class 11, Truck and dog combinations (GCM>42.5 tonne), Dry bulk haulage (Garden Grove Haulage)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Bradley Carraill, Managing Director of Garden Grove
Haulage. Garden Grove is a family owned and operated nursery, landscape and garden supplies
centre in Adelaide, South Australia.
Garden Grove has its own haulage department which manages a large range of bulk cartage
requirements, with a fleet of more than 100 heavy vehicles. Garden Grove Haulage operates locally
and to regional areas of South Australia, along with Victoria and New South Wales. Garden Grove
Haulage transports a range of cargoes for its customers from garden products to grain, fertilisers,
manures and gravel.
It should be noted that 95% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads.
Garden Grove Haulage mostly operates 3-axle rigid trucks and 4-axle dog trailers. This case study
focuses on this vehicle type.
Impact
Data collected for more than forty 3-axle rigid trucks and 4-axle dog trailers shows that, on a yearly
basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 150,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 61.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 18
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Decrease by $722 (-8.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $543 (+6.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,821 (-20.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,712 (-41.1%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $1,171 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,263 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $2,306 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $5,051 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $1,894 (-5.7%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $720 (-2.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $485 (+1.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,339 (+4.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Under Option A and compared to the Base Case in SA, these vehicles would face a moderate decrease in
total yearly charges due to an increase in registration charge combined with a decreased RUC. In
contrast, under Options B and C, these vehicles would face a moderate increase in total yearly charges
due to a decrease in registration charge combined with an increased RUC.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 19
8. Victoria, Vehicle Class 11, Truck and dog combinations (GCM>42.5 tonne) Dry bulk haulage (Holcim Pty Ltd)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Paul Cowman, Regional Transport Manager Victoria of
Holcim Pty Ltd. In Australia, Holcim has been delivering construction materials for more than 90
years. Originally serving the industry under the well-known Readymix and Humes brands, Holcim now
continues to supply products including aggregate and sand, concrete, concrete pipe and products.
Holcim operates right across the Australian continent supplying concrete from a network of more than
200 concrete plants, 900 mixer trucks and mobile and on site facilities. Premixed concrete formed from
cement, aggregates, additives and water are delivered in specially designed transit mixers.
It should be noted that 90% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads.
Holcim mostly operates 3-axle rigid trucks and 4-axle dog trailers. This case study focuses on this
vehicle type.
Impact
Data collected for a hundred 3-axle rigid trucks and 4-axle dog trailers shows that, on a yearly basis,
these vehicles travel an average distance of 90,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of
55.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 20
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Decrease by $722 (-8.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $543 (+6.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,821 (-20.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,712 (-41.1%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $634 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $683 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $1,247 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $2,732 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the total yearly charge (RUC +
registration) for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $1,356 (-6.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $140 (-0.6%) for
Option A
Decrease by $574 (-2.6%) for
Option B
Decrease by $980 (-4.4%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Because of the decrease in registration charges for truck & dog combinations for most options considered
in this RIS when compared to the Base Case in Victoria, combined with a low kilometrage travelled by
these vehicles, the total charge for the Updated Status Quo, Options A, B and C will be lower than that of
the Base Case for the vehicles considered in this case study.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 21
9. Queensland, Vehicle Class 11, Truck and dog combinations (GCM>42.5 tonne), General freight haulage (Single Transport Services)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Ian Single, Director and Driver with Single Transport
Services Pty Ltd. Ian & Carol Single's small family transport business started in Mackay on the 13th
February, 1980. Single Transport specialises in transport, installation & unloading of products with very
large cranes on their trucks/semis lifting up to 6.5 tonnes. Single Transport services local industries,
the mills, mines and rural areas.
About 95% of Single Transport’s haulage takes place on sealed roads.
Single Transport Services operates a range of vehicle configurations including two 4-axle rigid trucks
combined with 4-axle dog trailers. This case study will focus on these vehicles.
Impact
Data collected for two 4-axle rigid trucks combined with 4-axle dog trailers in Qld shows that, on a
yearly basis, these vehicles considered in this case study travel an average distance of 45,000 km and
have an average fuel consumption of 55.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 22
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly registration charge for each truck &
dog combination (GCM>42.5 tonne)
would on average:
Decrease by $722 (-8.0.%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $543 (+6.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,821 (-20.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,712 (-41.1%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $317 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $342 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $624 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,366 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $1,039 (-6.7%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $201 (+1.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,197 (-7.7%) for
Option B
Decrease by $2,346 (-15.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Under Option A and compared to the Base Case, these vehicles would face a moderate increase in total
yearly charges due to an increase in registration charge combined with a decreased RUC. In contrast,
under Options B and C, these vehicles would face a decrease in total yearly charges due to a significant
decrease in registration charge combined with an increased RUC.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 23
10. Interstate, Vehicle Class 11, Truck & dog combinations (GCM>42.5 t), Dry and liquid bulk haulage (Boral Logistics)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Merv Rowlands, Fleet Engineering Manager of Boral
Logistics. Boral's Australian Construction Materials business is a major supplier of products to the
dwelling, commercial construction, roads and engineering markets. Products include asphalt,
concrete, quarries, transport, recycling, and concrete placing.
Boral Logistics operates one of Australia's largest dedicated fleets, providing bulk transport and
logistics solutions to the construction materials businesses and other Boral divisions. It specializes in
dry and liquid bulk haulage and performs for customers Australia wide. With around 420 operating
sites throughout Australia, Boral Construction Materials & Cement has a regional focus to serve
Boral's local markets.
It should be noted that 98% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads.
Boral Logistics operates a range of vehicle configurations including 200 3-axle rigid truck & tri-axle dog
tippers. This case study will focus on Bora’s truck & dog tipper operations. For the needs of this case
study, the following graphs will be produced using NSW registration charges as Boral’s head office is
located in Sydney, NSW.
Impact
Data collected for 200 truck & dog tippers shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an
average distance of 90,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 55.5 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 24
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Decrease by $722 (-8.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $543 (+6.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,821 (-20.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,712 (-41.1%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $639 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $689 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $1,259 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $2,757 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $1,362 (-6.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $147 (-0.7%) for
Option A
Decrease by $562 (-2.5%) for
Option B
Decrease by $955 (-4.3%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Because of the decrease in registration charges for truck & dog combinations for most options considered
in this RIS when compared to the Base Case in NSW, combined with a low kilometrage travelled by these
vehicles, the total charge for the Updated Status Quo, Options A, B and C will be lower than that of the
Base Case for the vehicles considered in this case study.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 25
11. Queensland, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, Fuel haul tankers (DirectHaul)
Operator profile
Directhaul is the appointed cartage contractor for a number of fuel distribution companies throughout
the Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia, delivering to a wide range
of commercial and retail customers as well as the company’s own operated fuel sites. Directhaul is
wholly owned subsidiary of Ausfuel Gull, Directhaul transport over 1 billion litres of fuel products each
ear. The Directhaul fleet comprises 75-plus road trains, 200 trailers and over 120 dedicated team
members. Directhaul’s areas of operation are represented in the map below.
Directhaul operates 2-, 3-, and 4-axle rigid trucks, as well as 6-articulated trucks, B-doubles, double
road trains, triple road trains, and quadruple road trains. A significant proportion of Directhaul haulage
operations in Queensland is undertaken by 6-axle articulated trucks which are well adapted to fuel
haulage operations from and to its depots in Queensland. For that reason, this case study will focus
on 6-axle articulated trucks.
Impact
Data collected for 15 semi-trailer trucks operating in Queensland shows that, on a yearly basis, these
vehicles travel an average distance of 103,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of
53.5 L/100km.
Source: www.directhaul.com.au
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 26
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these 6-axle articulated trucks would on
average:
Decrease by $474 (-7.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $881 (-13.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,278 (-34.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,396 (-51.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly RUC for each of these 6-axle
articulated trucks would on average:
Decrease by $705 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $760 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $1,389 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $3,042 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these 6-axle articulated trucks
would on average:
Decrease by $1,179 (-5.6%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,641 (-7.7%) for
Option A
Decrease by $890 (-4.2%) for
Option B
Decrease by $355 (-1.7%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Because of the sharp decrease in registration charges for 6-axle articulated trucks for all options
considered in this RIS when compared to the Base Case, the total charge for these vehicles for the
Updated Status Quo, Options A, B and C will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the increased
RUC proposed in Options B and C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 27
12. Tasmania, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight haulage (TasFreight)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Kerry Gibson, CEO of TasFreight. Tasfreight was
established at Latrobe near Devonport, Tasmania in May 1984 primarily to provide a fast and efficient
freight service between Tasmania and Melbourne. Originally geared to handle fresh fruit and
vegetables, Tasfreight now caters for all types of cargoes with the only exception being new furniture.
Tasfreight currently employs in excess of 200 permanent staff and over 40 subcontractors.
TasFreight operates rigid as well as articulated heavy vehicles. 6-axle articulated vehicles are the
second most common vehicle configuration in Tasfreight’s fleet. This case study focuses on this
vehicle type.
Although Tasfreight is based in Tasmania, it operates a number of interstate routes in mainland
Australia (e.g. Melbourne to Sydney). About 99.99% of Tasfreight’s operations are on sealed roads.
Impact
Data collected for more than thirty 6-axle articulated trucks operated by Tasfreight shows that, on a
yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 133,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 47.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 28
Compared to the Base Case in Tasmania,
the yearly registration charge for each 6-
axle articulated truck would on average:
Decrease by $474 (-7.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $881 (-13.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,278 (-34.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,396 (-51.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Tasmania,
the yearly RUC for each 6-axle articulated
truck would on average:
Decrease by $800 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $863 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $1,575 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $3,451 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Tasmania,
the total yearly charge (RUC +
registration) for each 6-axle articulated
truck would on average:
Decrease by $1,274 (-5.5%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,743 (-7.5%) for
Option A
Decrease by $703 (-3.0%) for
Option B
Increase by $54 (+0.2%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Because of the sharp decrease in registration charge for 6-axle articulated trucks for all options
considered in this RIS when compared to the Base Case in Tasmania, the total charge for these vehicles
for the Updated Status Quo, Options A and B will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the
increased RUC proposed in Options B. These vehicles would face a very moderate increase (+0.2%) in
total yearly charges under Option C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 29
13. Victoria, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight and container cartage (Wettenhall Logistics)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Scott Wettenhall, Managing Director of Wettenhall
Logistics. Wettenhall Logistics is a family owned company with nearly fifty years of service to the
transport industry in Australia. Wettenhall Logistics provides logistics solutions from transport,
warehousing, container handling, pick and pack, re-pack, destruction and disposal of damaged goods.
Wettenhall Logistics is based in Dandenong. A large proportion of its operations are between
Dandenong and Melbourne ports. All of its operations take place on sealed roads.
Wettenhall Logistics mostly operates articulated heavy vehicles. 6-axle articulated trucks are the most
common vehicle configuration in Wettenhall Logistics’ fleet. This case study focuses on this vehicle
type.
Impact
Data collected for twenty-five 6-axle articulated trucks operated by Wettenhall Logistics shows that, on
a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 100,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 55.6 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 30
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly registration charge for each 6-
axle articulated truck would on average:
Decrease by $474 (-7.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $881 (-13.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,278 (-34.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,396 (-51.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly RUC for each 6-axle articulated
truck would on average:
Decrease by $712 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $767 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $1,401 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $3,069 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the total yearly charge (RUC +
registration) for each 6-axle articulated
truck would on average:
Decrease by $1,186 (-5.6%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,648 (-7.7%) for
Option A
Decrease by $877 (-4.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $327 (-1.5%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Because of the sharp decrease in registration charges for 6-axle articulated trucks for all options
considered in this RIS when compared to the Base Case in Victoria, the total charge for these vehicles for
the Updated Status Quo, Options A, B and C will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the
increased RUC proposed in Options B and C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 31
14. New South Wales, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, Dry bulk haulage (Hanson)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Charlie Stoneman, Regional Logistics Manager of
Hanson. Hanson is one of Australia’s leading suppliers of heavy building materials to the construction
industry. As well as its fleet of concrete agitators and aggregate tippers, Hanson’s logistics network
also features cement tankers, a train and heavy-duty machinery including dump trucks, front-end
loaders and face-shovels.
About 95% of Hanson’s transport operations in NSW are on sealed roads.
Most of Hanson’s dry bulk haulage operations in NSW are operated by 3-axle rigid trucks combined
with 3-axle dog trailers. However, Hanson also operates several 6-axle articulated trucks which are the
subjects of this case study.
Impact
Data collected for ten 6-axle articulated trucks in NSW shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles
travel an average distance of nearly 111,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of
65.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 32
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each 6-axle
articulated truck would on average:
Decrease by $474 (-7.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $881 (-13.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,278 (-34.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,396 (-51.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each 6-axle articulated
truck would on average:
Decrease by $924 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $996 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $1,818 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $3,983 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each 6-axle articulated truck would on
average:
Decrease by $1,398 (-5.4%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,876 (-7.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $460 (-1.8%) for
Option B
Increase by $586 (+2.3%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the sharp decrease in the registration charge for 6-axle articulated trucks for all options considered
in this RIS when compared to the Base Case in NSW, the total charge for these vehicles for the Updated
Status Quo, Options A and B will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the increased RUC
proposed in Option B. These vehicles would face a moderate increase (+2.3%) in total yearly charges
under Option C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 33
15. Queensland, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight haulage (Single Transport Services)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Ian Single, Director and Driver of Single Transport
Services Pty Ltd. Ian & Carol Single's small family transport business started in Mackay in 1980.
Single Transport specialises in transport, installation & unloading of products with very large cranes on
their trucks/semis lifting up to 6.5 tonnes. Single Transport services local industries, the mills, mines
and rural areas.
About 95% of Single Transport’s haulage takes place on sealed roads.
Single Transport Services operates a range of vehicle configurations including three 6-axle articulated
trucks. This case study will focus on these vehicles.
Impact
Data collected for three 6-axle articulated trucks operated by Single Transport Services shows that, on
a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 50,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 50.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 34
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly registration charge for each 6-axle
articulated truck would on average:
Decrease by $474 (-7.1.%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $881 (-13.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,278 (-34.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,396 (-51.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly RUC for each 6-axle articulated
truck would on average:
Decrease by $320 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $345 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $630 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,380 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $794 (-6.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,226 (-9.2%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,648 (-12.4%) for
Option B
Decrease by $2,016 (-15.2%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the sharp decrease in registration charges for 6-axle articulated trucks for all options considered in
this RIS when compared to the Base Case in Qld, the total charge for these vehicles for the Updated
Status Quo, Options A, B and C will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the increased RUC
proposed in Options B and C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 35
16. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight haulage (Rod Pilon Transport)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Stephen Perry, Compliance Manager for Rod Pilon
Transport. Rod Pilon Transport was founded by Roddy Pilon in Dubbo, New South Wales in 1972. In
1975 Roddy extended the company's role to include road trains, with runs to Darwin taking the
company's services nationwide.
Rod Pilon Transport’s fleet consists of traybody vehicles, tautliners, flat tops, tippers, convertibles, low
loaders, stepdown and extendable trailers. Modern prime movers and trailers are utilised with single,
B-Double and road train configuration throughout Australia.
About 95% of Rod Pilon’s transport operations in Vic, NSW and Qld are on sealed roads, with the
remaining on unsealed roads.
A significant share of Rod Pilon’s general freight haulage operations in Vic, NSW and Qld are operated
by 6-axle articulated trucks. For the needs of this case study, the following graphs will be produced
using NSW registration charges as Rod Pilon’s head office is located in Dubbo, NSW.
Impact
Data collected for the eleven 6-axle articulated vehicles operated by Rod Pilon Transport shows that,
on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 175,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 50.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 36
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each 6-axle
articulated truck would on average:
Decrease by $474 (-7.1.%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $881 (-13.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,278 (-34.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,396 (-51.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each 6-axle articulated
truck would on average:
Decrease by $1,120 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,208 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $2,205 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $4,830 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each 6-axle articulated truck would on
average:
Decrease by $1,594 (-5.3%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,088 (-7.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $73 (-0.2%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,434 (+4.8%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Under Option B, the decrease in registration charge is large enough to drive the total yearly charge for 6-
articulated trucks down. Under Option C, these vehicles would face a significant increase in total yearly
charge due to the magnitude of the RUC increase which would be higher than the decrease in registration
charge for this particular vehicle class.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 37
17. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, General freight haulage, refrigerated and dangerous goods (Day’s Transport & Logistics)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Craig Day, CEO/Director of Day’s Transport &
Logistics. Day's Transport & Logistics Pty Ltd is a family owned and operated company. Operation
commenced in 1946 with the purchase of second hand truck by the late Stan Day. The Business grew
over the years, as Brian and Geoff Day (Stan's sons) joined the business, which saw freight being
carried from the Riverina region to areas as far as North Queensland, Sydney, Melbourne, Newcastle,
and Northern WA.
Day's Transport has a number of depots across Australia and is one of the leading transport
companies in the Riverina Region. Day's Transport is a specialist in the carriage of wide and long
loads. Currently Day's Transport has seven trucks that traverse Australia. Day's Transport has
implemented cutting edge Environmental practices to reduce its footprint on the environment and a
program to continually update its vehicles to the latest emission standards (currently Euro 4 and
phasing in Euro 5 compliant heavy vehicles).
About 95% of Day's Transport & Logistics’ haulage takes place on sealed roads, with the remaining on
unsealed roads.
Day’s Transport & Logistics operates two 6-axle articulated trucks which are the object of this case
study. For the needs of this case study, the following graphs will be produced using NSW registration
charges as Day’s Transport & Logistics’ head office is located in Narrandera, NSW.
Impact
Data collected for two 6-axle articulated trucks operated by Day’s Transport & Logistics shows that, on
a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 180,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 48.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 38
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each 6-axle
articulated truck would on average:
Decrease by $474 (-7.1.%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $881 (-13.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,278 (-34.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,396 (-51.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each 6-axle articulated
truck would on average:
Decrease by $1,106 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,192 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $2,177 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $4,769 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $1,580 (-5.4%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,073 (-7.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $101 (-0.3%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,373 (+4.7%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Under Option B, the decrease in registration charges is large enough to drive the total yearly charge for 6-
articulated trucks down. Under Option C, these vehicles would face a significant increase in total yearly
charge due to the magnitude of the RUC increase which would be higher than the decrease in registration
charge for this particular vehicle class.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 39
18. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, Refrigerated goods haulage (Nolan’s Transport)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Adrian Nolan, Operations Manager/Director of Nolan’s
Transport. Nolan's Interstate Transport is one of the largest family-owned and operated transport
businesses in Queensland. The company now operates approximately 130 vehicles.
The main depot which is located in "Brooking Drive, Gatton" includes a large loading/unloading facility,
cold room storage, fast cool premises, large workshop area, and administration facility. The company
employs 250 staff transporting and distributing general freight and perishables from the Lockyer Valley
Region to the various markets throughout Australia.
It should be noted that 100% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads.
Nolan’s Transport operates a range of vehicle configurations including 50 6-axle articulated. This case
study will focus on these vehicles. For the needs of this case study, the following graphs will be
produced using Queensland registration charges as Nolan’s head office is located in Gatton, Qld.
Impact
Data collected for fifty 6-axle articulated trucks shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an
average distance of 260,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 45.5 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 40
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Decrease by $474 (-7.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $881 (-13.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,278 (-34.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,396 (-51.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $1,514 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,633 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $2,981 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $6,530 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $1,988 (-5.2%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,513 (-6.6%) for
Option A
Increase by $703 (+1.9%) for
Option B
Increase by $3,134 (+8.3%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
The increase in RUC being more significant than the decrease in registration charge for the 6-axle articulated
trucks operated by this company under Options B and C, the total charge for these vehicles for Options B and C
will be higher than that of the Base Case despite their reduced registration charge. This is in particular due to
the high distance travelled by these double road trains which results in a large yearly fuel consumption.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 41
19. Interstate, Vehicle Class 16, 6-axle articulated trucks, Dry and liquid bulk haulage (Boral Logistics)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Merv Rowlands, Fleet Engineering Manager with Boral
Logistics. Boral's Australian Construction Materials business is a major supplier of products to the
dwelling, commercial construction, roads and engineering markets. Products include asphalt,
concrete, quarries, transport, recycling, and concrete placing.
Boral Logistics operates one of Australia's largest dedicated fleets, providing bulk transport and
logistics solutions to the construction materials businesses and other Boral divisions. It specializes in
dry and liquid bulk haulage and performs for customers Australia wide. With around 420 operating
sites throughout Australia, Boral Construction Materials & Cement has a regional focus to serve
Boral's local markets.
It should be noted that 98% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads.
Boral Logistics operates a range of vehicle configurations including 100 6-axle articulated heavy
vehicles. This case study will focus on these vehicles. For the needs of this case study, the following
graphs will be produced using NSW registration charges as Boral’s head office is located in Sydney,
NSW.
Impact
Data collected for 100 6-axle articulated trucks shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an
average distance of 120,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 51.3 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 42
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Decrease by $474 (-7.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $881 (-13.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,278 (-34.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,396 (-51.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $788 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $850 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $1,551 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $3,398 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $1,262 (-5.5%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,730 (-7.5%) for
Option A
Decrease by $727 (-3.2%) for
Option B
Stay unchanged for Option C ($2
increase).
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the sharp decrease in registration charges for 6-axle articulated trucks for all options considered in
this RIS when compared to the Base Case in NSW, the total charge for these vehicles for the Updated
Status Quo, Options A and B will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the increased RUC
proposed in Options B.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 43
20. Western Australia, Vehicle Class 17, B-doubles (<9axle rig), Refrigerated good haulage (anonymous)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC received data from a large transport company specialising in the haulage
of refrigerated goods. This company is based in WA but operates interstate. This company has not
agreed to its name being disclosed in this document which is why this case study is described as
anonymous.
It should be noted that 100% of this company’s haulage is operated on sealed roads.
This company operates B-doubles (<9 axle rigs) and double road trains. This case study is focussing
on its B-double operations.
Impact
Data collected for more than 50 B-doubles (<9axle rig) operating in WA and interstate shows that, on a
yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 250,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 60.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 44
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
yearly registration charge for each B-
double would on average:
Increase by $1,505 (+13.9%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $2,691 (+24.9%) for
Option A
Decrease by $588 (-5.4%) for
Option B
Decrease by $3,210 (-29.7%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
yearly RUC for each B-double would on
average:
Decrease by $1,920 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,070 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $3,780 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $8,280 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each B-double would on average:
Decrease by $415 (-0.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $621 (+1.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $3,192 (+6.3%) for
Option B
Increase by $5,070 (+10.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
The increase in RUC being more significant than the decrease in registration charge for the B-doubles
operated by this company under Options B and C, the total charge for these vehicles for Options B and C
will be higher than that of the Base Case despite their reduced registration charge. This is in particular due
to the high distance travelled by these B-doubles compared to the national average.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 45
21. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, General freight haulage and refrigerated goods (Farragher Transport Group)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Dennis Roohan, National Fleet Maintenance Manager
with John Farragher Transport Group. Farragher was established in 1933 as a removal company in
Newcastle. The company is privately owned and managed by third generation owner John Farragher.
The operation has progressed to initially beverage distribution and specialised freight retail logistics
and now asset management 3PL and 4PL services.
Farragher Transport is a total Supply Chain Solutions provider for the Australasian market. It supplies
“Best Practice” 3PL and 4PL logistical services with operations in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and
Newcastle with staff operating in every state of Australia and internationally in Hong Kong and
Shanghai (China).
About 98% of Farragher Transport’s haulage takes place on sealed roads.
Farragher Transport operates twenty 9-axle B-doubles which are the subject of this case study. For the
needs of this case study, the following graphs will be produced using NSW registration charges as the
Farragher Group Head Office is based at the Cameron Park DC, 20km west of Newcastle.
Impact
Data collected for twenty 9-axle B-doubles operated by Farragher Transport shows that, on a yearly
basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 250,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 58.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 46
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each B-
double would on average:
Decrease by $1,617 (-10.8.%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,352 (-9.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $4,658 (-31.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $7,303 (-48.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each B-double would on
average:
Decrease by $1,856 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,001 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $3,654 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $8,004 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each B-double would on average:
Decrease by $3,473 (-6.5%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $3,353 (-6.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,004 (-1.9%) for
Option B
Increase by $701 (+1.3%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the decrease in registration charges for B-doubles for all options considered in this RIS when
compared to the Base Case in NSW, the total charge for these vehicles for the Updated Status Quo,
Options A and B will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the increased RUC proposed in Option
B. These vehicles would face a moderate increase in total yearly charges under Option C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 47
22. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, General freight haulage, refrigerated and dangerous goods (Day’s Transport & Logistics)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Craig Day, CEO/Director of Day’s Transport &
Logistics. Day's Transport & Logistics Pty Ltd is a family owned and operated company. Operation
commenced in 1946 with the purchase of second hand truck by the late Stan Day. The Business grew
over the years, as Brian and Geoff Day (Stan's sons) joined the business, which saw freight being
carried from the Riverina region to areas as far as North Queensland, Sydney, Melbourne, Newcastle,
and Northern WA.
Day's Transport has a number of depots across Australia and is one of the leading transport
companies in the Riverina Region. Day's Transport is a specialist in the carriage of wide and long
loads. Currently Day's Transport has seven trucks that traverse Australia. Day's Transport has
implemented cutting edge practices to reduce its environmental footprint and a program to continually
update its vehicles to the latest emission standards (currently Euro 4 and phasing in Euro 5 compliant
heavy vehicles).
About 95% of Day's Transport & Logistics’ haulage takes place on sealed roads.
Day’s Transport & Logistics operates five 9-axle B-doubles which are the object of this case study. For
the needs of this case study, the following graphs will be produced using NSW registration charges as
Day’s Transport & Logistics’ head office is located in Narrandera, NSW.
Impact
Data collected for five 9-axle B-doubles operated by Day’s Transport & Logistics shows that, on a
yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 200,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 58.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 48
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each B-
double would on average:
Decrease by $1,617 (-10.8.%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,352 (-9.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $4,658 (-31.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $7,303 (-48.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each B-double would on
average:
Decrease by $1,485 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,601 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $2,923 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $6,403 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each B-double would on average:
Decrease by $3,102 (-6.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,953 (-6.5%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,735 (-3.8%) for
Option B
Decrease by $900 (-2.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the sharp decrease in registration charges for B-doubles for all options considered in this RIS when
compared to the Base Case in NSW, the total charge for these vehicles for the Updated Status Quo,
Options A, B and C will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the increased RUC proposed in
Options B and C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 49
23. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, Refrigerated goods haulage (Nolan’s Transport)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Adrian Nolan, Operations Manager/Director with Nolan’s
Transport. Nolan's Interstate Transport is one of the largest family-owned and operated transport
businesses in Queensland. From its humble beginnings back in the early 1900’s to its present
expansion, the company now operates approximately 130 vehicles.
The main depot which is located in "Brooking Drive, Gatton" includes a large loading/unloading facility,
cold room storage, fast cool premises, large workshop area, and administration facility. The company
employs 250 staff transporting and distributing general freight and perishables from the Lockyer Valley
Region to the various markets throughout Australia.
It should be noted that 100% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads.
Nolan’s Transport operates a range of vehicle configurations including 80 B-doubles. This case study
will focus on these vehicles. For the needs of this case study, the following graphs will be produced
using Queensland registration charges as Nolan’s head office is located in Gatton, Qld.
Impact
Data collected for roughly 80 B-doubles shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an
average distance of 260,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 55.6 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 50
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Decrease by $1,617 (-10.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,352 (-9.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $4,658 (-31.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $7,303 (-48.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $1,850 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,995 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $3,643 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $7,980 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $3,467 (-6.5%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $3,347 (-6.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,016 (-1.9%) for
Option B
Increase by $677 (+1.3%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the sharp decrease in registration charge for B-doubles for all options considered in this RIS when
compared to the Base Case in Qld, the total charge for these vehicles for the Updated Status Quo,
Options A and B will be lower than that of the Base Case. These vehicles would face a moderate increase
(+1.3%) in total yearly charges under Option C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 51
24. Interstate (mainly Eastern seaboard), Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, General freight haulage (Rod Pilon Transport)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Stephen Perry, Compliance Manager with Rod Pilon
Transport. Rod Pilon Transport was founded by Roddy Pilon in Dubbo, New South Wales in 1972. In
1975 Roddy extended the company's role to include road trains, with runs to Darwin taking the
company's services nationwide.
Rod Pilon Transport’s fleet consists of traybody vehicles, tautliners, flat tops, tippers, convertibles, low
loaders, stepdown and extendable trailers. Modern prime movers and trailers are utilised with single,
B-Double and road train configuration throughout Australia.
About 95% of Rod Pilon’s transport operations in Vic, NSW and Qld are on sealed roads.
Most of Rod Pilon’s general freight haulage operations in Vic, NSW and Qld are operated by 9-axle B-
doubles. For the needs of this case study, the following graphs will be produced using NSW
registration charges as Rod Pilon’s head office is located in Dubbo, NSW.
Impact
Data collected for the 33 B-doubles operated by Rod Pilon Transport shows that, on a yearly basis,
these vehicles travel an average distance of 185,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of
65.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 52
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly registration charge for each B-
double would on average:
Decrease by $1,617 (-10.8.%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,352 (-9.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $4,658 (-31.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $7,303 (-48.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
yearly RUC for each B-double would on
average:
Decrease by $1,539 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,659 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $3,030 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $6,638 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NSW, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each B-double would on average:
Decrease by $3,156 (-6.7%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $3,012 (-6.4%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,628 (-3.5%) for
Option B
Decrease by $665 (-1.4%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the sharp decrease in registration charges for B-doubles for all options considered in this RIS when
compared to the Base Case, the total charge for these vehicles for the Updated Status Quo, Options A, B
and C will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the increased RUC proposed in Options B and C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 53
25. Interstate, Vehicle Class 18, 9-axle B-doubles, General and express parcel freight, bulk, dangerous goods (Toll Linehaul and Fleet Services)
Operator profile
Toll Linehaul and Fleet Services is Toll’s specialist linehaul business taking full loads point to point
on behalf of other Toll business units. Toll is Australia’s largest transport company, based in
Melbourne, Victoria. It has been operating for 125 years.
Toll Linehaul caters a range of cargoes including general freight, express parcel freight, bulk and
dangerous goods. A significant proportion of Toll Linehaul’s operations is undertaken by B-doubles
which are well adapted to interstate transport operations. For that reason, this case study focuses on
B-double operations.
It should be noted that 98% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads.
© Photo by James Lauritz
Impact
Data collected for several hundred B-doubles operating interstate shows that, on a yearly basis, these
vehicles travel an average distance of 350,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of
58.2 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 54
Compared to the Base Case, the yearly
registration charge for each of these B-
doubles would on average:
Decrease by $1,617 (-10.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,352 (-9.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $4,658 (-31.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $7,303 (-48.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case, the yearly
RUC for each of these B-doubles would
on average:
Decrease by $2,607 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,811 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $5,133 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $11,244 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case, the total
yearly charge (RUC + registration) for
each of these B-doubles would on
average:
Decrease by $4,224 (-6.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $4,163 (-6.0%) for
Option A
Increase by $475 (+0.7%) for
Option B
Increase by $3,941 (+5.7%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the high number of kilometres travelled by the B-doubles considered in this case study, the total
charge for these vehicles for Options B and C will be higher than that of the Base Case despite their
significantly reduced registration charge.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 55
26. Victoria, Vehicle Class 18, 10-axle B-doubles, Container cartage (Wettenhall Logistics)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Scott Wettenhall, Managing Director of Wettenhall
Logistics. Wettenhall Logistics is a family owned company with nearly fifty years of service to the
transport industry in Australia. Wettenhall Logistics offers a total Logistics solution for its customers
from transport, warehousing, container handling, pick and pack, re-pack, destruction and disposal of
damaged goods.
Wettenhall Logistics is based in Dandenong. A large proportion of its operations are between
Dandenong and Melbourne ports. All of its operations take place on sealed roads.
Wettenhall Logistics mostly operates articulated heavy vehicles. B-doubles are the second most
common vehicle configuration in Wettenhall Logistics’ fleet. This case study focuses on this vehicle
type.
Impact
Data collected for twelve 9- or 10-axle B-doubles operated by Wettenhall Logistics shows that, on a
yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 150,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 66.7 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 56
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly registration charge for each B-
double would on average:
Decrease by $1,617 (-10.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,352 (-9.0%) for
Option A
Decrease by $4,658 (-31.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $7,303 (-48.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly RUC for each B-double would
on average:
Decrease by $1,281 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,381 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $2,521 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $5,523 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the total yearly charge (RUC +
registration) for each B-double would on
average:
Decrease by $2,898 (-7.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,733 (-6.6%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,137 (-5.2%) for
Option B
Decrease by $1,780 (-4.3%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the sharp decrease in registration charges for B-doubles for all options considered in this RIS when
compared to the Base Case in Victoria, the total charge for these vehicles for the Updated Status Quo,
Options A, B and C will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the increased RUC proposed in
Options B and C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 57
27. South Australia, Vehicle Class 19, B-triples, General freight (Whiteline Transport)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Bob Middleton, Managing Director of Whiteline
Transport. Whiteline Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd, is an Adelaide based freight forwarding firm with a
history dating back to the late 70’s. With its beginnings as a one-man, owner-driver business, Director
Bob Middleton ran a White 4000 prime mover and bogie drive trailer between Adelaide-Sydney-Perth.
These days, Whiteline Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd is managed by Directors Bob and Sharon Middleton
and employs in excess of 50 staff and offers a specialised service to Western Australia. It is a daily
service with a 2-3 day delivery period.
Although Whiteline Transport is based in Adelaide, a large proportion of its operations are between
Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth.100% of its operations take place on sealed roads. Whiteline
Transport mostly transports general freight and dangerous goods.
Whiteline Transport mostly operates articulated heavy vehicles. B-triples are the second most common
vehicle configuration in its fleet. This case study focuses on this vehicle type.
Impact
Data collected for nearly twenty B-triples operated by Whiteline Transport shows that, on a yearly
basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 250,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 72.5 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 58
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
yearly registration charge for each B-triple
would on average:
Decrease by $2,173 (-11.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $3,026 (-16.5%) for
Option A
Decrease by $6,780 (-36.9%) for
Option B
Decrease by $9,782 (-53.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
yearly RUC for each B-triple would on
average:
Decrease by $2,320 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,501 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $4,568 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $10,005 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each B-triple would on average:
Decrease by $4,493 (-6.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $5,528 (-8.3%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,212 (-3.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $223 (+0.3%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the sharp decrease in registration charges for B-triples for all options considered in this RIS when
compared to the Base Case in SA, the total charge for these vehicles for the Updated Status Quo, Options
A, B will be lower than that of the Base Case despite the increased RUC proposed in Options B and C.
These vehicles would face a moderate increase (+0.3%) in total yearly charges under Option C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 59
28. Western Australia, Vehicle Class 20, Pocket double road trains, Dry bulk and livestock – owner/driver (Cunderdin Transport Service)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Mark Sullivan, owner/driver with Cunderdin Transport
Service. Cunderdin Transport Service was established at Cunderdin, WA, by Mr Sullivan in 1998
primarily to provide a freight service between Cunderdin, Perth and Bunbury. Cunderdin Transport
Service caters a range of cargoes including livestock (sheep), wool, fertilizer, grain cartage and
limesand.
For its livestock carting operations between Cunderdin and Perth, about 30% of the trip is travelled on
unsealed roads and 70% on sealed roads. For Cunderdin to Bunbury about 25% is spent on unsealed
roads and 75% on sealed roads. For Bulk operation carting fertiliser, limesand and grain about 30% of
the trip is travelled on unsealed roads and 70% on sealed roads.
Cunderdin Transport Service operates four pocket road trains and one livestock B-double. This case
study will focus on livestock and dry bulk haulage by double road trains
Impact
Data collected for four pocket double road trains operating in WA shows that, on a yearly basis, these
vehicles travel an average distance of 55,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of
146.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 60
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
yearly registration charge for each double
road train would on average:
Increase by $738 (+6.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $1,472 (+12.1%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,834 (-15.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $4,478 (-36.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
yearly RUC for each double road train
would on average:
Decrease by $1,028 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,108 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $2,024 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $4,433 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each double road train would on
average:
Decrease by $290 (-0.9%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $364 (+1.1%) for
Option A
Increase by $190 (+0.6%) for
Option B
Decrease by $46 (-0.1%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
A significant proportion of Cunderdin Transport’s travel is on unsealed roads. This explains the high fuel
consumptions of its double road trains. The increased RUC for these road trains is however compensated
with an equivalent decrease in vehicle registration charges which is why the change in total yearly charge
for Cunderdin Transport is likely to be very moderate under the updated SQ, Options A, B or C.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 61
29. Western Australia, Vehicle Class 20, Double road trains, Refrigerated goods haulage (anonymous)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC received data from a large transport company specialised in the haulage
of refrigerated goods. This company is based in WA but operates interstate. This company has not
agreed to its name being disclosed in this document which is why this case study is described as
anonymous.
It should be noted that 100% of this company’s haulage is operated on sealed roads.
This company operates B-doubles (<9 axle rigs) and double road trains. This case study is focussing
on its double road train operations.
Impact
Data collected for approximately 20 double road trains operating in WA and interstate shows that, on a
yearly basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 300,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 75.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 62
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
yearly registration charge for each double
road train would on average:
Increase by $738 (+6.1%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $1,472 (+12.1%) for
Option A
Decrease by $1,834 (-15.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $4,478 (-36.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
yearly RUC for each double road train
would on average:
Decrease by $2,880 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $3,105 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $5,670 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $12,420 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each double road train would on
average:
Decrease by $2,142 (-3.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,633 (-2.3%) for
Option A
Increase by $3,836 (+5.3%) for
Option B
Increase by $7,942 (+11.1%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
The increase in RUC being more significant than the decrease in registration charge for the B-doubles
operated by this company under Options B and C, the total charge for these vehicles for Options B and C
will be higher than that of the Base Case despite their reduced registration charge. This is in particular due
to the high distance travelled by these double road trains which results in a large yearly fuel consumption.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 63
30. South Australia, Vehicle Class 20, Double road trains, General freight (Whiteline Transport)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Bob Middleton, Managing Director of Whiteline
Transport. Whiteline Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd, is an Adelaide based freight forwarding firm with a
history dating back to the late 70’s. With its beginnings as a one-man, owner-driver business, Director
Bob Middleton ran a White 4000 prime mover and bogie drive trailer between Adelaide-Sydney-Perth.
These days, Whiteline Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd is managed by Directors Bob and Sharon Middleton
and employs in excess of 50 staff offering a specialised service to Western Australia. It is a daily
service with a 2-3 day delivery period.
Although Whiteline Transport is based in Adelaide, a large proportion of its operations are between
Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth.100% of its operations take place on sealed roads. Whiteline
Transport mostly transports general freight and dangerous goods.
Whiteline Transport mostly operates articulated heavy vehicles. Double road trains are the most
common vehicle configuration in its fleet. This case study focuses on this vehicle type.
Impact
Data collected for twenty double road trains operated by Whiteline Transport shows that, on a yearly
basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 250,000 km and have an average fuel
consumption of 75.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 64
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
yearly registration charge for each double
road train would on average:
Decrease by $1,466 (-10.2%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $731 (-5.1%) for
Option A
Decrease by $4,037 (-28.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $6,682 (-46.4%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
yearly RUC for each double road train
would on average:
Decrease by $2,400 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,587 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $4,725 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $10,350 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in SA, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each double road train would on
average:
Decrease by $3,866 (-6.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $3,319 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $688 (+1.1%) for
Option B
Increase by $3,668 (+5.7%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Compared to the Base Case in SA, these vehicles would face a significant decrease in total yearly
charges under the Updated Status Quo and Option A. In contrast, under Options B and C, these vehicles
would face a moderate to significant increase in total yearly charges due to the magnitude of the RUC
increase despite a decrease in registration charge for this particular vehicle class.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 65
31. Northern Territory, Vehicle Class 21, triple road trains, Fuel haul tankers (DirectHaul)
Operator profile
Directhaul is the preferred contractor for a number of fuel distribution companies throughout the
Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia, delivering to a wide range of
commercial and retail customers as well as the company’s own operated fuel sites. Directhaul is
wholly owned subsidiary of Ausfuel Gull transporting over 1 billion litres of fuel products each year. The
Directhaul fleet comprises 75+ road trains, 200 trailers and over 120 dedicated team members.
Directhaul’s areas of operation are represented in the map below.
Directhaul operates 2-, 3-, and 4-axle rigid trucks, as well as 6-articulated trucks, B-doubles, double
road trains, triple road trains, and quadruple road trains. A significant proportion of Directhaul haulage
operations is undertaken by triple road trains which are particularly well adapted to the Northern
Territory. For that reason, this case study focuses on triple road train operations.
Impact
Data collected for 25 triple road trains operating in NT shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles
travel an average distance of 207,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 95 L/100km.
Source: www.directhaul.com.au
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 66
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these triple road trains would on average:
Increase by $482 (+3.2%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $569 (+3.8%) for
Option A
Decrease by $3,185 (-21.4%) for
Option B
Decrease by $6,187 (-41.5%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
yearly RUC for each of these triple road
trains would on average:
Decrease by $2,517 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,714 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $4,956 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $10,855 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these triple road trains would
on average:
Decrease by $2,035 (-3.0%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,145 (-3.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $1,771 (+2.6%) for
Option B
Increase by $4,668 (+7.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Due to the high fuel consumption and distance travelled by the triple road trains considered in this case
study, the total charge for these vehicles for Options B and C will be higher than that of the Base Case
despite their reduced registration charge.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 67
32. Northern Territory, Vehicle Class 21, Triple road trains, Dry bulk haulage (G & S Transport)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Robert Bilato, owner and Managing Director (Operations)
of G & S Transport. G & S Transport is a family owned company with a head office located in Alice
Springs and offices and depots located in Newman and Karratha, Western Australia.
G & S Transport specializes in bulk tipper haulage of quarry products to remote areas throughout
Central and North Australia as well as the Pilbara region of WA. G & S Transport has well established
business partnerships within the mining, freight and indigenous business sectors and has fostered
strong customer relations with companies such as CEMEX Australia, Newmont, TOLL Express, Rio
Tinto, BHP and the Fortescue Group..
G & S Transport offers a wide range of support services to its customers, undertaking projects
involving camp construction, road works, cement, lime and sand haulage as well as general and rail
freight.
It should be noted that 60% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads, the rest being on
unsealed roads.
G & S Transport operates 27 road trains comprising of triples, quads and doubles. Triple road trains
are the subject of this case study.
Impact
Data collected for more than 25 triple road trains shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel
an average distance of 180,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 100.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 68
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Increase by $482 (+3.2%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $569 (+3.8%) for
Option A
Decrease by $3,185 (-21.4%) for
Option B
Decrease by $6,187 (-41.5.5%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $2,304 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $2,484 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $4,536 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $9,936 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $1,822 (-2.9%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,915 (-3.1%) for
Option A
Increase by $1,351 (+2.2%) for
Option B
Increase by $3,749 (+6.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
The increase in RUC being more significant than the decrease in registration charge for the triple road
trains considered in this case study under Options B and C, the total charge for these vehicles for Options
B and C will be higher than that of the Base Case despite their reduced registration charge.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 69
33. Northern Territory, Vehicle Class 21, Triple road trains, General freight, liquid and dry bulk, dangerous goods and machinery (WRSC)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr Michael Swart, Director of Wildman River Stock
Contractors (WRSC). WRSC now cartes heavy machinery, oil and gas and counts about 100
customers on its books. Michael Swart, who runs the business with brother Jeffrey, says operating in
the Territory is hard because crumbling roads increase maintenance cost to vehicles.
It should be noted that only 40% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads, the rest being
on unsealed roads.
WRSC mostly operates double and triple road trains. This case study will focus on triple road trains.
Impact
Data collected for up to twelve triple road trains shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an
average distance of 100,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 90.9 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 70
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Increase by $482 (+3.2%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $569 (+3.8%) for
Option A
Decrease by $3,185 (-21.4%) for
Option B
Decrease by $6,187 (-41.5%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $1,164 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,254 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $2,291 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $5,018 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in NT, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $682 (-1.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $686 (-1.8%) for
Option A
Decrease by $894 (-2.3%) for
Option B
Decrease by $1,169 (-3.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge change
compared to Base Case
Due to the sharp decrease in registration charges for triple road trains under Options B and C when compared
to the Base Case in NT, the total charge for these vehicles under Options B and C will be lower than that of the
Base Case despite the increased RUC proposed in Options B and C. The total charge for these vehicles under
the Updated Status Quo and Option A will also be lower than that of the Base Case because of the proposed
RUC reduction under these two Options.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 71
34. Western Australia, Vehicle Class 21, Triple road trains, General freight and refrigerated goods haulage (Centurion Transport)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC interviewed Mr John Lawrence and Mr Craig Holt, respectively workshop
supervisor and manager with Centurion Transport. Centurion has operated as a privately owned
West Australian company since 1971 and services all the state’s major mining and exploration regions,
namely the Pilbara, Murchison, Kimberley and the Goldfields. Centurion started when brothers Frank
and Carl Cardaci purchased their very first truck in 1968, with the company formally incorporated three
years later.
For over 40 years Centurion offered a broad range of logistics services including full end-to-end
solutions, lead logistics and off site receiving for the energy and resource sectors, general freight,
warehousing, refrigerated services, retail distribution, logistic support, over-dimensional transport,
heavy haulage, specialised projects and time critical services.
Centurion has a network of branches across Western Australia and the size of the fleet continuing to
grow. Centurion today operates a fleet of over 900 vehicles. Centurion's extensive fleet includes prime
movers that meet Euro V emission standards, producing lower levels of carbon emissions. These
prime movers deliver outstanding fuel consumption and enhanced driver safety features
It should be noted that 80% of this business's haulage is operated on sealed roads.
Centurion mostly operates triple road trains. This case study will focus on this vehicle configuration.
Impact
Data collected for roughly 200 triple road trains shows that, on a yearly basis, these vehicles travel an
average distance of 200,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of 72.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 72
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
yearly registration charge for each of
these vehicles would on average:
Increase by $898 (+6.2%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $985 (+6.8%) for
Option A
Decrease by $2,768 (-19.1%) for
Option B
Decrease by $5,770 (-39.9%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
yearly RUC for each of these vehicles
would on average:
Decrease by $1,843 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,987 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $3,629 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $7,949 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in WA, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each of these vehicles would on
average:
Decrease by $945 (-1.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $1,002 (-1.9%) for
Option A
Increase by $860 (+1.6%) for
Option B
Increase by $2,178 (+4.1%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
The increase in RUC being is more significant than the decrease in registration charge for the triple road
trains considered in this case study under Options B and C (mainly due to their high
kilometragemileage).T, the total charge for these vehicles under Options B and C will be higher than that
of the Base Case despite their reduced registration charge.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 73
35. Victoria, Vehicle Class 24, 2-axle buses (GVM>10.0t), Passenger transport (anonymous)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC received data from a large passenger transport company providing bus
service in a metropolitan area. This company is based in Victoria but operates interstate. This
company has not agreed to its name being disclosed in this document which is why this case study is
described as anonymous.
This case study focuses on 2-axle bus operations. It should be noted that 100% of this company’s
operations take place on sealed roads.
Impact
Data collected for a large number of 2-axle buses operating in Victoria shows that, on a yearly basis,
these vehicles travel an average distance of 64,000 km and have an average fuel consumption of
43.0 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 74
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly registration charge for each 2-
axle bus (GVM>10.0t) would on average:
Increase by $88 (+17.5%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Increase by $92 (+18.2%) for
Option A
Decrease by $92 (+18.2%) for
Option B
Decrease by $92 (+18.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the yearly RUC for each 2-axle bus
(GVM>10.0t) would on average:
Decrease by $352 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $380 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $694 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,519 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Victoria,
the total yearly charge (RUC +
registration) for each 2-axle bus
(GVM>10.0t) would on average:
Decrease by $264 (-3.4%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $288 (-3.7%) for
Option A
Increase by $786 (+10.1%) for
Option B
Increase by $1,611 (+20.7%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
Considering the increases in RUC and registration charge for 2-axle buses (GVM>10.0t) under Options B
and C, the total charge for these vehicles for Options B and C will be significantly higher than that of the
Base Case.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 75
36. Queensland, Vehicle Class 25, 3-axle coaches, Passenger transport (anonymous)
Operator profile
For this case study, the NTC received data from a large passenger transport company providing coach
service between metropolitan areas in Queensland. This company is based in Queensland but also
operates interstate. This company has not agreed to its name being disclosed in this document which
is why this case study is described as anonymous.
This case study focuses on 3-axle bus operations. It should be noted that 100% of this company’s
operations take place on sealed roads.
Impact
Data collected for a large number of 3-axle coaches operating in Queensland shows that, on a yearly
basis, these vehicles travel an average distance of 25,500 km and have an average fuel consumption
of 33.3 L/100km.
Heavy vehicle charges determination – Appendix: Case Studies February 2014 76
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly registration charge for each 3-axle
coach would on average:
Decrease by $161 (-6.4%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $99 (-3.9%) for
Option A
Decrease by $622 (-24.7%) for
Option B
Decrease by $1,040 (-41.2%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
yearly RUC for each 3-axle coach would
on average:
Decrease by $109 (-4.8%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $117 (-5.2%) for
Option A
Increase by $214 (+9.5%) for
Option B
Increase by $469 (+20.8%) for
Option C.
Compared to the Base Case in Qld, the
total yearly charge (RUC + registration)
for each 3-axle coach would on average:
Decrease by $270 (-5.7%) for the
Updated Status Quo
Decrease by $217 (-4.5%) for
Option A
Decrease by $408 (-8.6%) for
Option B
Decrease by $572 (-12.0%) for
Option C.
Summary
Updated SQ Option A Option B Option C
RUC + registration charge
change compared to Base Case
The increase in RUC for the 3-axle coaches operated by this company is compensated by a larger
decrease in registration charge under Options B and C which is why the total yearly charge for these
coaches under all options considered in the RIS is expected to be lower than that of the Base Case.