2014 California red-legged frog egg mass survey summary report
-
Upload
park-stewardship-program -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
description
Transcript of 2014 California red-legged frog egg mass survey summary report
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 1
FINAL REPORT 2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey Mori Point and Milagra Ridge
September 15, 2014
Prepared by: Ruby Kwan Park Stewardship Program Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy Fort Mason Building 201 San Francisco, CA 9412
Prepared for: National Park Service Golden Gate National Recreation Area Division of Resource Management
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 2
SUMMARY
This report summarizes the results of the 2013/2014 seasonal surveys of California red-legged frog egg
masses at known breeding areas. The goal of the egg mass survey is to determine the presence or
absence of the red-legged frog at Mori Point and Milagra Ridge, and to assess trends in the abundance
of winter-breeding red-legged frogs. Park Stewardship Program staff and interns conducted four egg
mass surveys during the winter monitoring season on February 12, 25, March 14, and April 8.
New egg masses were observed during all surveys except the last one. The peak in observations
occurred on February 12, after the first heavy rains. The total number of egg masses observed this year
increased at Milagra Ridge from 20 to 39, while there was a sharp decline (113 to 16) in egg masses
observed a Mori Point. Egg masses were observed at all ponds at Mori Point except at the Middle Pond.
At Milagra Ridge, 58% of the total egg masses observed were attached to floating vegetation close to
the perimeter of the pond. It would be interesting to see if there is a correlation between the number of
egg masses and the distance from the edge of the pond.
As this was a particularly dry year and most of the ponds did not have water until February, breeding
and oviposition which would normally begin in December was restricted to a narrow window. The dry
conditions may also have impacted the frog physiologically and the stress caused by the environment
may have made it less favorable for the frogs to mate, produce, and lay eggs.
Fortunately, all ponds in both sites continue to serve as good breeding habitats as evidenced by the
presence of egg masses in ponds found at Milagra and Mori Point. At Mori Point, the Southern and
Wetland Ponds continue to be the more frequented pond while the Middle Pond is less frequented.
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 3
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Natural history The California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) is the largest endemic native frog in the western United
States. It was listed as a threatened species in 1996, as the species was slowly eliminated from 70
percent of its natural range in California (USFWS, 2002). Habitat loss, introduction of non-native
predatory bull frogs and fish, diseases such as the chytrid fungus, and over hunting by humans are all
factors that contributed to the decline of the red-legged frog in California. Currently, the red-legged frog
ranges along the coast from Mendocino County in northern California to Baja, California, then inland
through the Sacramento Valley into the foothills of their Sierra Nevada Mountains (Scott and Rathbun,
2005). In the Bay Area, there are populations in the Point Reyes National Seashore, Lake Merced, and
Golden Gate Park. In the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), there are populations in Marin
(Muir Beach, Banducci, Tennessee Valley) and San Mateo (Mori Point and Milagra Ridge) (USFWS, 2002).
The red-legged frog breeds in ponds, wetlands, lagoons, and lakes. The frogs mate and lay eggs often
synchronous with the first heavy rains in winter from late November through April (USFWS, 2002; Fellers
and Kleeman, 2007). Females attach a large gelatinous cluster of eggs about the size of a grapefruit on
vegetation beneath the water. Each egg cluster can contain 750-1300 eggs. During this time, eggs are
preyed upon by newts, salamanders, and raccoons. The eggs hatch after about three to four weeks and
tadpoles metamorphose in four to five months. The peak in metamorphosis is in August. One egg mass
will produce one breeding pair of frogs (Scott and Rathbun, 2005). In the adult phase, the red-legged
frog is preyed upon by garter snakes, predatory birds (great horned owls, hawks, great blue heron), and
raccoons. The average life span for an adult frog is 2-3 years and the maximum is six years (Scott and
Rathbun, 2005).
1.2 Surveying
The Park Stewardship Program (PSP) monitors egg masses at Mori Point and Milagra Ridge, both sites
located in Pacifica, San Mateo County.
The goal of the egg mass survey is to determine the presence or absence of the red-legged frog at Mori
Point and Milagra Ridge, and to assess trends in the abundance of winter-breeding California red-legged
frogs. This report provides a summary of survey results for the 2013/2014 breeding season.
1.2.1 Mori Point
Mori Point is a 110-acre coastal land parcel with a matrix of coastal shrub and wetland vegetation, and
provides habitat for the California red-legged frog. Adjacent to Mori Point is the Sharp Park Golf Course,
managed by the City and County of San Francisco, and both are contiguous sites within the Sanchez
Creek/Laguna Salada watershed (Figure 1). The frogs utilize the ponds and waterways at both locations
for breeding although dominant wetland features are primarily inside Sharp Park.
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 4
In November 2004, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the Golden Gate National Parks
Conservancy, and the GGNRA collaborated to
construct two seasonal ponds at Mori Point to
provide amphibian habitat and foraging areas
for the San Francisco garter snake (Willow and
Middle Ponds, LS05 and LS06). In 2007, the
Middle Pond was modified to hold water longer
and the Wetland and Southern Ponds (LS08 and
LS07) were created through excavation
(Wetland Pond is also known as the Northern
Pond). In 2009, the Middle Pond was modified
again to incorporate a bentonite lining into the
base of the pond to prolong the ponding period.
In the 2003/2004 winter season, PSP began
surveying the ponds for red-legged frog egg
masses during the winter season, typically from
December to April. Egg mass surveys have
occurred at seven locations, which were
selected based on historical presence-absence
data. The most dominant bodies of water,
Horsestable Pond and Laguna Salada, have
been surveyed since 1999 by the San Francisco
Recreation and Parks Natural Areas Department.
However, egg mass surveys are not completed
annually at Laguna Salada, and infrequently at
the Horsestable Pond and Sanchez Creek. Since
their construction, the Willow Pond (LS05),
Middle Pond (LS06), Southern Pond (LS07), and
Wetland Pond (LS08) have been surveyed for
CRLF eggs each season, thus this report only
examines data from the four aforementioned
ponds.
1.2.2 Milagra Ridge
Monitoring at Milagra Ridge began in the
2000/2001 winter season. Egg mass surveys are
completed annually in an abandoned oxidation pond constructed by the United States Army sometime
prior to the mid 1950’s (MC01) (Figure 2). Open water is present for only a portion of the year fed
directly by rainfall and surface runoff. Water leaves the pond via evapotranspiration, seepage, and is
drained through a series of pipes and is from an existing drainage system (Fong and O’Neill, 2000).
FIGURE 1. A map of ponds at Mori Point and Sharp Park.
FIGURE 2. A map of sampling area at Milagra Ridge.
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 5
Back in 2000, it was determined that the oxidation pond does not retain water long enough, whether in
normal or dry years, to allow the red-legged frog tadpoles to metamorphose (Fong and O’Neill, 2000).
Under normal conditions, the pond would be entirely dry by June while metamorphosis takes place well
beyond this time. This posed a significant threat to the mortality of the red-legged frogs (Fong and
O’Neill, 2000). In 2009, repairs were made to the drainage system to prevent excess leakage thus
slowing down water loss.
2. METHODS
Egg mass surveys were conducted mid-February through April in three to four week intervals to avoid
sampling an egg mass twice. In order for a survey to be conducted, the water in the ponds had to be
clear in order for the surveyor(s) to see the egg masses. The ponds that had water (Willow and Wetland
Ponds) were unofficially monitored for eggs on January 16 but no eggs were observed. After the first
heavy rain in February, all the ponds contained water. Surveys started on February 12 and occurred
during daylight hours on February 25, March 14, and April 8.
This season, surveys were conducted by PSP staff and interns. The ponds were surveyed twice for eggs
by two separate surveyors making independent passes around the pond going opposite directions. This
method was started this monitoring season and the purpose is to ensure consistency between two
samples, detect any inconsistencies between surveys if any arose, and monitor the sampling methods
for accuracy.
For each new egg mass, data collected about the
mass included the egg mass shape (sphere, ½
sphere, or rectangular), egg mass dimensions,
water depth at egg mass, location of egg mass
relative to the water surface, the type of
vegetation to which the egg mass is attached to
(twig, tule, cattail, etc.), and the Gosner life stage.
Each egg mass was assigned a number in order of
appearance to help keep track of the number of
egg masses. The number count restarted at “1”
for each separate survey. The vegetation near
each observed egg mass was flagged and marked
with the date and the egg mass number to avoid
recounting the egg mass in subsequent surveys if
it did not hatch after three to four weeks. The
location of the egg masses at each pond was
mapped by drawing a point on an aerial map of
each pond.
FIGURE 3. Restoration intern John Doyle with the Park Stewardship Program records egg mass data at the Milagra oxidation pond.
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 6
The number of adult red-legged frog observed incidentally during the course of egg mass surveying was
also recorded. The number of adults and egg masses observed of other frog species (commonly the
Sierran tree frog) were also recorded.
Data related to environmental and habitat conditions were also recorded. This includes, the weather,
wind speed, air and water temperatures, average and max water depths, dominant vegetation, percent
emergent vegetation, submergent vegetation, and percent open water. The pond level was continually
monitored once a month after the end of the winter survey season. See Appendix 1 for max water depth
data for each pond during the egg mass surveys. See Appendix 2 for a copy of the GGNRA Egg Mass
Datasheet. See Appendix 3 for a copy of a map that is complementary to the datasheet.
Copies of the datasheets were sent to the GGNRA Aquatic Ecologist. Egg mass data and pond level data
were entered into and analyzed in spreadsheets specific to PSP.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Abundance Mori Point This season, surveys indicated the presence of a red-legged frog population and breeding activity at all
ponds at Mori Point except at the Middle Pond. Breeding was most concentrated at the Southern and
Wetland ponds (Figure 4). A total of sixteen egg masses were observed.
The total number of red-legged frog egg masses observed at each four ponds declined from the previous
season (Figure 5). This trend was further emphasized in comparison the total number of egg masses
observed at Mori Point (Figure 6). In addition to egg mass totals, the total rainfall (inches) is graphed and
each value represents the total rainfall from July through June of each year.
FIGURE 4. Mori Point. Total number of California red-legged frog egg masses observed at each pond. Sixteen egg masses were observed in the 2013/2014 breeding season.
2
8
6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Willow Pond (LS05) Middle Pond (LS06) Southern Pond (LS07) Wetland Pond (LS08)
# o
f C
RLF
egg
mas
ses
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 7
Although the rainfall total was lower during this season, based on a regression analysis, there was no
significant relationship between rainfall totals and the number of red-legged frog egg masses (R2 = 0.01,
n=10, p=0.698, α=0.05). However, there are two factors that may have skewed egg mass data thus
confound the analysis results. First, the four ponds did not exist until 2007 and second, even after the
ponds were established it took a couple of years for the vegetation to establish and the exposed habitat
may have been a deterrent for breeding frogs.
FIGURE 5. Mori Point. Number of California red-legged frog egg masses observed at each pond. Monitoring at the Southern and Wetland Ponds started in 2007 following their completion and there has been a steadily increasing trend since. There was a significant decline in egg mass observations in the 2013/2014 season.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14
# o
f C
RLF
egg
mas
ses
Monitoring season
Willow Pond (LS05)
Middle Pond (LS06)
Southern Pond (LS07)
Wetland Pond (LS08)
FIGURE 6. Mori Point. Abundance of California red-legged frog egg masses observed overtime (Note: only since 2007 have all four ponds been monitored). Total rainfall is given in inches and represents the rain that fell from July through June of a given year.
3 12 3
23
35 28
128 130
113
16
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14
Total rain
fall (in.) #
of
CR
LF e
gg m
asse
s
Monitoring season
# of CRLF egg massesTotal rainfall (in.)
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 8
The dry conditions this past year may have impacted the frog oviposition by other means. In a study of
red-legged frog movement and habitat use, more frogs moved towards breeding ponds during the onset
of heavy rains (Fellers and Kleeman). Furthermore, red-legged frogs breed when the water temperature
is cool in the winter in comparison to water temperatures in the spring and summer (Cook and Jennings,
2007). There is a possibility that a later start in the rain season and the persistence of warmer
temperatures this year may have delayed red-legged frog breeding. As a result, breeding and oviposition
which would normally begin in December, was restricted to a narrow window from February to April.
Aside from altering the cycle, the drought could also have had a physiological impact on the red-legged
frog, creating stressful conditions that affected the reproductive output of the population (Carey and
Alexander, 2003).
There was water in the Willow and Wetland ponds between November and January but the Southern
and Middle ponds were completely dry until February which is late into the winter season. Oviposition
typically starts in November/December; however, conditions may not have been favorable for the red-
legged frog to lay eggs. Although the Willow and Wetland Ponds had water between November and
January, eggs were not observed until February after the first heavy rain. The observations this season
supports the current consensus that the presence of water in the pond is not as much of a cue for the
frog to lay eggs as the first rain event (Scott and Rathbun, 2002).
Despite the decline, the silver lining to this season’s observations is that egg masses were consistently
observed at three ponds, indicating that the red-legged frog is still present at Mori Point and is using the
provided ponds for breeding. The Southern and Wetland Ponds continue to be the favored habitat for
the frogs while the Middle Pond is less frequented.
Milagra Ridge Like Mori Point, the number of egg masses observed at the Milagra oxidation pond fluctuated over time.
However, unlike the trend observed at Mori Point, the total number of red-legged frog eggs at Milagra
increased between this and the previous season from 20 to 39, despite a lower rainfall amount (rainfall
is based on a period from July through June of the following year) (Figure 7).
A regression analysis indicates that there is no significant relationship between the number of egg
masses and total rainfall (R2 = 0.045, n=14, p=0.466, α=0.05), suggesting that the amount of rainfall did
not influence egg mass abundance. Likewise, there is no significant relationship (R2 = 0.001, n=7,
p=0.941, α=0.05) between the number of egg masses and the average max water depth of the pond
from November through April, suggesting that the amount of water in the Milagra Ridge pond also did
not influence egg mass abundance. The aforementioned analyses support the idea that as long as there
is water, the red-legged frog would use the pond for oviposition.
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 9
The condition of the Milagra Ridge pond may be a factor that contributed to the increase in egg mass
abundance observed this season. In a comparative study of red-legged frog oviposition sites, egg masses
tended to be found in shallow water near the shore (<1 m) in habitats where vegetation was restricted
to a narrow zone near the shore (Alverez et al., 2013). Additionally, in a study of red-legged frog habitat
use, red-legged frog egg masses occurred almost exclusively in shallow water attached to unattached,
floating, dead biomass (Cook and Jennings, 2007). Before the pond at Milagra Ridge filled with water,
tule and cattails were removed and piled in the pond. When the pond filled, some of the cut biomass
was distributed throughout the area particularly near the edge of the pond. More than half (58%) of the
egg masses observed were attached to cut vegetation while the remaining eggs were attached to the
ground or on standing vegetation. This leads to the speculation that the increase in egg masses at
Milagra may be due to the increase in surface area available for egg mass attachment and the ease of
access to this biomass, despite a later start to the season and lower pond level this season.
It would be interesting to see if there is a correlation between distance from the edge of the pond and
the number of egg masses observed. In doing so, it can help inform restoration and habitat
management of red-legged frog ponds in terms of where vegetation should be cut or replanted to most
benefit the frog.
3.2 Phenology
Over the three month monitoring season, observations of red-legged frog egg masses were the highest
in February in the Southern and Wetland Ponds which coincided with the time when the pond first held
water (Figure 8). At Milagra Ridge, observations were also highest during the two observation periods in
February. New egg masses were not observed at Mori Point and Milagra Ridge during the last survey on
April 8th.
FIGURE 7. Milagra Ridge. Abundance of California red-legged frog egg masses observed over time in the oxidation pond. Total rainfall is given in inches and represents the rain that fell from July through June of a given year.
27
81
53
40
39
31 35
61
12
68
51 43
20
39
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000/01 2002/03 2004/05 2006/07 2008/09 2010/11 2012/13
Total rain
fall (in.) #
of
CR
LF e
gg m
asse
s
Monitoring season
# CRLF egg masses
Total rainfall (in.)
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 10
Amphibian reproduction is highly vulnerable to variations in temperature and the amount and timing of
precipitation (Carey and Alexander, 2003). Both temperature and precipitation are triggers for frogs to
breed and migrate towards breeding habitat. In a study of breeding phenology of the common frog
Rana temporaria, the reproductive cycle of R. temporaria is occurring 9 days earlier since 1992 as a
result of temperature increases over time (Scott et al., 2008). Warmer temperatures have shifted the
phenology of spring and summer breeding frogs (Carey and Alexander, 2003). This begs to question if
the breeding season for winter breeding frogs, such as the red-legged frog, would occur later into the
year given the persistence of warmer temperatures during drought years.
At Mori Point and Milagra Ridge last season, egg masses were observed in December. This year, there
was a two month delay. It would be interesting to monitor, or analyze if the data is available, the start
time of the breeding season of the red-legged frog at Mori Point and Milagra Ridge to detect any
changes of this event.
4. CONCLUSION
This past season was a particularly dry season with the ponds at Milagra and Mori not holding water
until late winter in February. Despite a late start in the breeding season, the California red-legged frogs
managed to breed and lay eggs in all of the known breeding habitats at Milagra and Mori Point,
although no eggs were observed at the Middle Pond this season. Continued habitat maintenance and
restoration is need to protect the red-legged frog, especially if dry conditions such as those experienced
this past season is to persist for years to come. Habitat maintenance includes removing non-native tule
and cattails, and removing vegetation necessary to promote a 50/50 ratio between open water and
vegetation before the breeding season.
FIGURE 8. Mori Point. Number of California red-legged frogs egg masses observed at each pond by survey date.
2
3
4
1
6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2/12/2014 2/25/2014 3/14/2014 4/8/2014
# o
f C
RLF
egg
mas
ses
Willow Pond (LS05) Middle Pond (LS06) Southern Pond (LS07) Wetland Pond (LS08)
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 11
5. LITERATURE CITED Alverez, J.A., Cook, D.G., Yee, J.L., van Hattem, M.G., Fong, D.R., and Fisher, R.N. 2013. Comparative Microhabitat
Characteristics at Oviposition Sites of the California Red-Legged Frog (Rana Draytonii). Herpetological Conservation and Biology. 8(3): 539-551.
Carey, C. and Alexander, M.A. 2003. Climate Change and Amphibian Declines: Is There A Link? Diversity and
Distributions. 9(2): 111-121. Cook, D.G., and Jennings, M.R. 2007. Microhabitat Use of the California red-legged Frog and Introduced Bullfrog in
a Seasonal Marsh. Herpetologica. 63(4): 430-440. Fellers, G.M. and Kleeman, P.M. 2007. California Red-Legged Frog (Rana draytonii) Movement and Habitat Use:
Implications for Conservation. Journal of Herpetology. 41(2): 276-286. Fong, D. and O’Neill, S. 2000. Milagra Ridge Oxidation Pond Management Plan. Golden Gate National Recreation
Area. 19 p. Scott, N. and Rathbun, G. 2005. California red-legged frog PowerPoint presentation. Livermore, CA. April 2009. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Recovery plan for the California Red-legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii). U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 173 p. Scott, A.W., Pithart, D., Adamson, J.K. 2008. Long-term United Kingdom Trends in the Breeding Phenology of the
Common Frog, Rana temporaria. Journal of Herpetology. 42(1): 89-96.
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 12
APPENDIX 1: Pond level summary
FIGURE 9. Mori Point. Average max water depth (feet) at each pond from July 2013 to July 2014. The South Pond, one of the most productive ponds did not have much water between November through March. The Middle Pond did not have water until February 2014. Since there were multiple readings per month for certain months, the average depth is calculated.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
July September October November January February March April May June July
Total rain
fall (in)
Ave
rage
max
wat
er
de
pth
(ft
)
Middle PondSouth PondWetland PondWillow PondTotal rainfall (in)
FIGURE 10. Milagra Ridge. Average max water depth (meters) at each pond from June 2013 to June 2014. Since there were multiple readings per month for certain months, the average depth is calculated. Pond level was not monitored between June and December 2013.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
June December January February March April May June
Total rain
fall (in.)
Ave
rage
max
wat
er
de
pth
(m
)
Average max depth (m)
Total rainfall (in)
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 13
APPENDIX 2
GGNRA Egg Mass Datasheet
Date (mm-dd-yyyy): Begin Time (PST-Military): Total Time (Min): Observer(s): General Location: NPS Location ID: County: UTM: Weather: Clear Overcast/Fog Pt. Cloudy Mostly Cloudy Rain
Beaufort Wind: <1 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24
Air Temp.: C (at 1 m) F
Water Temp.: C (0.5m out) F
Habitat: Natural Altered 1 2 3 4 5
Type: Lake Pond Emerg. Wetl. Ditch Stream Seep/Spring
Drainage: Permanent Seasonal
Watershed: Natural Grazed Logged Urban Agriculture Other
Substrate: Silt Sand (<2mm) Pebble (2-75 mm) Cobble (75-300mm) Boulder (>300mm) Bedrock
Survey Length: m
Survey Width: m
Aver. Depth: m
Max Depth: m
Water Flow: 0 <1 fps 1-5 fps 5-10 fps >10 fps
Visibility (m): Emergent Vegetation: %
Submergent Vegetation: %
Open Water: %
Dominant Emergent Vegetation:
Dominant Submergent Vegetation:
Fish Present: Yes No
Species and Approx. Number:
Species ID
# # Egg Masses
Mass Shape (sphere, ½ sphere, rect)
Mass Dimensions (cm)
Water Depth (cm)
Egg Mass Depth (cm from bottom) Stranded?
Egg Attachment Type (e.g., twigs, cattail, tule)
Gosner Stage
Comment
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
COMMENTS (e.g., surveyed route, habitat conditions, observation, conditions):
CRLF_eggmass_datasht_v2009.doc Rev. 11/09
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 14
APPENDIX 3: Survey Map
2014 California Red-legged Frog Survey 15
APPENDIX 4: Data Locations
All information pertaining to the CRLF data used in this report can be located here:
Mori Point
J:\Community Programs\Bldg 34 Files\Park Stewardship\Restoration\SITES\Mori Point\mp_wildlife\mp_crlf\2014 CRLF Monitoring Season This report: 2014_Mori_CRLF_report_final_20140915.docx Data used in this report: mp_CRLF_egg_mass_data_2014.xlsx Pond level data: J:\Community Programs\Bldg 34 Files\Park Stewardship\Restoration\SITES\Mori Point\mp_pond\ mp_pond_data.xls Milagra Ridge
J:\Community Programs\Bldg 34 Files\Park Stewardship\Restoration\SITES\Milagra Ridge\mr_wildlife\mr_crlf\2014 CRLF Monitoring Season This report: There will be a shortcut to this report linking to storage under Mori Point. Data used in this report: mr_CRLF_egg_mass_data_2014.xlsx Pond level data: J:\Community Programs\Bldg 34 Files\Park Stewardship\Restoration\SITES\Milagra Ridge\mr_pond\ mr_pond_data.xls