2013 Data. Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row Most significant...

117
2013 Data

Transcript of 2013 Data. Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row Most significant...

Page 1: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2013 Data

Page 2: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening”

began in 2007. Liver additions increased for first time since 2010.

Total and active registrations at year end peaked again in 2013

Waiting List National Trends

Page 3: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

10000

20000

30000

40000

Kidney Liver

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Additions

2004-2013U.S.

Page 4: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

50010001500200025003000350040004500

Heart Lung PancreasHeart-Lung Kidney-Pancreas Pancreas IsletIntestine

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Additions

2004-2013U.S.

Page 5: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013U.S.

Page 6: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013U.S.

Page 7: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

1000

2000

3000

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013U.S.

Page 8: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013U.S.

Page 9: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 1

Page 10: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

50

100

150

200

250

300

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 1

Page 11: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

40

80

120

160

200

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 1

Page 12: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

5

10

15

20

25

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 1

Page 13: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

4000

8000

12000

16000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 2

Page 14: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 2

Page 15: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 2

Page 16: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

30

60

90

120

150

180

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 2

Page 17: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

3000

6000

9000

12000

15000

18000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 3

Page 18: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 3

Page 19: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 3

Page 20: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 3

Page 21: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

3000

6000

9000

12000

15000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 4

Page 22: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 4

Page 23: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

50

100

150

200

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 4

Page 24: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

5

10

15

20

25

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 4

Page 25: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 5

Page 26: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 5

Page 27: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 5

Page 28: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 5

Page 29: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 6

Page 30: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

20

40

60

80

100

120

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 6

Page 31: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

20

40

60

80

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 6

Page 32: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

3

6

9

12

15

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 6

Page 33: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 7

Page 34: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 7

Page 35: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 7

Page 36: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

30

60

90

120

150

180

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 7

Page 37: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 8

Page 38: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 8

Page 39: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

30

60

90

120

150

180

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 8

Page 40: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

5

10

15

20

25

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 8

Page 41: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 9

Page 42: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 9

Page 43: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

40

80

120

160

200

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 9

Page 44: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 9

Page 45: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

2000

4000

6000

8000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 10

Page 46: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 10

Page 47: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

50

100

150

200

250

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 10

Page 48: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 10

Page 49: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

Kidney LiverKidney - Active Liver - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 11

Page 50: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

Heart Lung Heart-LungHeart - Active Lung - Active Heart-Lung - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 11

Page 51: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

50

100

150

200

250

PancreasKidney-Pancreas

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 11

Page 52: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

4

8

12

16

20

Pancreas Islet IntestinePI - Active Intestine - Active

Year of Snapshot

Num

ber o

f Reg

istr

ation

sWaiting List Registrations

2004-2013Region 11

Page 53: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donor and Transplant Data

Page 54: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Deceased donors increased by 1.5% (8,267

from 8,143), and increased donor transplants

decreased by 3.2% from 2012 increases in DCD, ECD donors

DCD donors now comprise 15% of deceased

donors overall (ranges from 7%-30% by region)

2.1% increase in living donation from 2012-

2013; first increase since 2009.

National Trends

Page 55: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

5988

8267

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013

U.S.

Page 56: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 110%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Deceased Donor Living Donor

Region

Perc

ent o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013

U.S.

Page 57: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

318

280

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 1

Page 58: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

846

1054

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 2

Page 59: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

300

600

900

1200

1500

650

1289

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 3

Page 60: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

1000

529

737

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 4

Page 61: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

300

600

900

1200

1500

916

1296

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 5

Page 62: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

183

297

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 6

Page 63: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

742

654

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 7

Page 64: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

262

672

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 8

Page 65: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

499

356

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 9

Page 66: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

1000

663

710

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 10

Page 67: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

380

922

Deceased DonorLiving Donor

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased and Living Donors2004-2013Region 11

Page 68: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Deceased Donation2012-2013

U.S.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 8,143 28,602 24,557 3.02

2013 8,267 29,398 25,431 3.08

% Change 1.5% 2.8% 3.6% 2.0%

Page 69: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1205

1817

5245

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013

U.S.

15%

Page 70: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

2271

3455

19705

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Organs Transplanted from Deceased Donors by Type

2004-2013U.S.

Page 71: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-3

0

3

6

9

12

15

1.5

-0.7

3.5

8.9

2.81.8

3.5

9.6

3.62.3

5.1

13

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - U.S.

Page 72: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 110%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

SCD ECD DCD

Region

Perc

ent o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type and Region

2013

Page 73: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 259 888 773 2.99

2013 280 883 759 2.71

% Change 8.1% -0.6% -1.8% -9.2%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 1

Page 74: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

40

80

120

160

200

85

54

141

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

30%

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 1

Page 75: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-10

0

10

20

30

8.1

0.7

12.5

19.7

-0.6

-7.1

15

8.9

-1.8

-7.9

12.5 10.8

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 1

Page 76: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 1,024 3,507 2,734 2.67

2013 1,054 3,659 2,908 2.76

% Change 2.9% 4.3% 6.4% 3.3%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 2

Page 77: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

166

297

591

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 2

16%

Page 78: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

2.9 3

13.8

-12.2

4.3 3

19.2

-10.8

6.4 3.3

31.7

-5.1

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 2

Page 79: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 1,351 4,748 4,192 3.10

2013 1,289 4,518 4,055 3.15

% Change -4.6% -4.8% -3.3% 1.4%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 3

Page 80: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

94

323

872

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 3

7%

Page 81: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-20

-10

0

10

20

-4.6

-10.9

13.38

-4.8-8.7

9.9 11.4

-3.3-7.3

16.6 15.6

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 3

Page 82: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 750 2,717 2,384 3.18

2013 737 2,725 2,435 3.30

% Change -1.7% 0.3% 2.1% 3.9%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 4

Page 83: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

68

120

549

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 4

9%

Page 84: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

-1.7

0.2

-13.7

7.9

0.3 2.2

-15.2

82.1 3.5

-19.8

31.5

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 4

Page 85: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 1,196 4,285 3,807 3.18

2013 1,296 4,731 4,124 3.18

% Change 8.4% 10.4% 8.3% 0.0%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 5

Page 86: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

1000

161

274

861

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 5

12%

Page 87: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-5

0

5

10

15

20

8.49.8

2.2

11.810.4

11.7

3.2

14.6

8.311

-4

5.9

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 5

Page 88: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 308 1,051 890 2.89

2013 297 1,042 942 3.17

% Change -3.6% -0.9% 5.8% 9.8%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 6

Page 89: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

50

100

150

200

250

58

37

202

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 6

20%

Page 90: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-20

-10

0

10

20

-3.6 -2.4

-17.8

3.6

-0.9

0.8

-11.9

0

5.8 6.1

-2.4

11.2

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 6

Page 91: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 615 2,146 1,824 2.97

2013 654 2,290 2,000 3.06

% Change 6.3% 6.7% 9.6% 3.1%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 7

Page 92: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

124

151

379

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 7

19%

Page 93: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

6.3

-3.1

20.825.3

6.71.2

16.4

29.9

9.6

2.3

39.236.3

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 7

Page 94: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 600 2,140 1,891 3.15

2013 672 2,398 2,105 3.13

% Change 12.0% 12.1% 11.3% -0.6%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 8

Page 95: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

137

142

393

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 8

20%

Page 96: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD0

5

10

15

20

25

30

12

8

18.3 18.1

12.19.7

11.9

25.6

11.3 10.1 10

20.9

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 8

Page 97: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 358 1,093 956 2.67

2013 356 1,074 918 2.58

% Change -0.6% -1.7% -4.0% -3.4%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 9

Page 98: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

50

100

150

200

250

300

55

99

202

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 9

15%

Page 99: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-10

0

10

20

30

-0.6

-6

-1

27.9

-1.7

-6.2

0.4

27

-4 -5.3 -7.2

15.6

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 9

Page 100: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 712 2,578 2,258 3.17

2013 710 2,671 2,323 3.27

% Change -0.3% 3.6% 2.9% 3.2%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 10

Page 101: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

151

110

449

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 10

21%

Page 102: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

-0.3-5.3

-12

33.6

3.6 1.5

-7.2

34

2.9 1.3

-9

35.3

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 10

Page 103: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

Donors Recovered

Organs Recovered

Organs Transplanted OTPD

2012 970 3,449 2,848 2.94

2013 922 3,407 2,862 3.10

% Change -4.9% -1.2% 0.5% 5.7%

Deceased Donation2012-2013Region 11

Page 104: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

200

400

600

800

106

210

606

SCD ECD DCD

Year

Num

ber o

f Don

ors

Deceased Donors by Type2004-2013Region 11

12%

Page 105: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

All SCD ECD DCD-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

-4.9

0.2

-12.1

-15.9

-1.2

3.9

-12.5

-17.1

0.53.4

-10.8

-6

Donors Recovered Organs Recovered Organs Transplanted

% C

hang

ePercent Change in Deceased Donors and Organs Recovered/Transplanted

2012 – 2013 - Region 11

Page 106: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

3000

6000

9000

12000

23

2531

108

11161

761

6203

1922

256

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013

U.S.

Page 107: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

100

200

300

400

500

1

84

2

390

14

226

499

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 1

Page 108: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

300

600

900

1200

1500

3

332

17

1424

87

738

262

34

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 2

Page 109: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

300

600

900

1200

1500

1800

2

289

12

1500

119

1111

19726

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 3

Page 110: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

6

286

0

963

69

539

288

11

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 4

Page 111: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

2400

8

436

5

1991

118

942

299

14

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 5

Page 112: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

100

200

300

400

500

0

75

0

449

20

180

562

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 6

Page 113: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

200

400

600

800

1000

1

230

4

825

97

490

15068

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 7

Page 114: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

200

400

600

800

1000

0

173

19

850

64

509

11223

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 8

Page 115: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU0

200

400

600

800

0

154

11

659

20

280

62

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 9

Page 116: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

200

400

600

800

1000

1

189

34

913

79

521

224

45

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 10

Page 117: 2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.

HL HR IN KI KP LI LU PA0

300

600

900

1200

1500

1

283

4

1197

74

667

223

14

2011 2012 2013

# of

Tra

nspl

ants

Deceased Donor Transplants 2011-2013 Region 11