FORD LIO HO MOTOR CO. Corporate Citizenship Presentation by Nina Ng February 2003.
2012/03/26 STP COL - NINA presentation · Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 5:56 PM To: Misenhimer,...
59
1 PMSTPCOL PEmails From: Chappell, Coley [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 5:56 PM To: Misenhimer, David Subject: NINA presentation Attachments: 3-27-2012 STP 3&4 Fukushima Presentation Final.pdf David, A copy of the NINA presentation for 3/27/2012 is attached. It is suitable for public disclosure. As discussed, NINA will bring hard copies to the meeting. Regards, Coley Chappell NINA Licensing STP 3&4
Transcript of 2012/03/26 STP COL - NINA presentation · Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 5:56 PM To: Misenhimer,...
1
PMSTPCOL PEmails
From: Chappell, Coley [[email protected]]Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 5:56 PMTo: Misenhimer, DavidSubject: NINA presentationAttachments: 3-27-2012 STP 3&4 Fukushima Presentation Final.pdf
David, A copy of the NINA presentation for 3/27/2012 is attached. It is suitable for public disclosure. As discussed, NINA will bring hard copies to the meeting. Regards, Coley Chappell NINA Licensing STP 3&4
Hearing Identifier: SouthTexas34Public_EX Email Number: 3340 Mail Envelope Properties (C7F098E3C31A0141A02043F0B8E656EE39BAF06D28) Subject: NINA presentation Sent Date: 3/26/2012 5:56:21 PM Received Date: 3/26/2012 5:54:44 PM From: Chappell, Coley Created By: [email protected] Recipients: "Misenhimer, David" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None Post Office: exgmb1.CORP.STPEGS.NET Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 223 3/26/2012 5:54:44 PM 3-27-2012 STP 3&4 Fukushima Presentation Final.pdf 1882949 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
STP
3 &
4 A
BW
R
Fuku
shim
a Ev
alua
tion
STP
3 &
4 C
apab
ilitie
s an
d S
EC
Y-1
2-00
25 R
ecom
men
datio
ns fo
r E
nhan
cing
Rea
ctor
Saf
ety
Pos
t-Fuk
ushi
ma
Dai
-ichi
2
NIN
A A
ttend
ees
Sco
tt H
ead
Man
ager
, Reg
ulat
ory
Affa
irs, S
TP 3
& 4
Ste
ve T
hom
asM
anag
er E
ngin
eerin
g, S
TP 3
& 4
Bill
Moo
khoe
kS
uper
viso
r, Li
cens
ing,
STP
3 &
4C
oley
Cha
ppel
lLi
cens
ing
Eng
inee
r, S
TP 3
& 4
Jim
Tom
kins
Lice
nsin
g E
ngin
eer,
STP
3 &
4D
ick
Ben
seLi
cens
ing
Eng
inee
r, S
TP 3
& 4
Tom
Dal
eyE
ngin
eerin
g, S
TP 3
& 4
Milt
on R
ejce
kE
ngin
eerin
g, S
TP 3
& 4
Bria
n M
cDon
ald
Prin
cipa
l Eng
inee
r, E
xpon
ent
Ste
ve F
rant
zA
ttorn
ey, M
orga
n Le
wis
& B
ocki
usA
l Gut
term
anA
ttorn
ey, M
orga
n Le
wis
& B
ocki
usR
ober
t Sch
raud
erV
ice
Pre
side
nt, L
icen
sing
, TA
NE
Bob
Qui
nnA
BW
R P
roje
ct M
anag
er, W
estin
ghou
se
3
Des
ired
Out
com
es
•Com
mon
Und
erst
andi
ng o
f:�
Exi
stin
g S
TP 3
& 4
cap
abili
ties
�C
ompa
rison
aga
inst
Tie
r 1 a
nd T
ier 2
reco
mm
enda
tions
in
SE
CY
-12-
0025
�Li
cens
ing
stra
tegy
for S
TP 3
& 4
•At t
he e
nd o
f thi
s pr
esen
tatio
n, w
e w
ill h
ave
dem
onst
rate
d ho
w S
TP 3
& 4
has
or w
ill a
ddre
ss th
e Fu
kush
ima
reco
mm
enda
tions
4
Age
nda
•O
verv
iew
of T
opic
s•
STP
Fuk
ushi
ma
Res
pons
e A
ctiv
ities
& T
eam
•O
verv
iew
of S
TP 3
& 4
AB
WR
•S
TP 3
& 4
Cap
abili
ties
and
SE
CY
-012
-002
5�
Floo
ding
�S
eism
ic�
Oth
er N
atur
al E
xter
nal H
azar
ds�
Sta
tion
Bla
ckou
t�
Rel
iabl
e H
arde
ned
Ven
ts�
SFP
Inst
rum
enta
tion
�E
OP
s, S
AM
Gs,
and
ED
MG
s�
Em
erge
ncy
Pre
pare
dnes
s�
Sum
mar
y•
Lice
nsin
g S
trate
gy•
Con
clus
ion
–Q
uest
ions
& C
omm
ents
5
SEC
Y-12
-002
5 Is
sues
: Ti
er 1
Act
iviti
es
2.1
–S
eism
ic a
nd fl
oodi
ng re
eval
uatio
ns
2.3
–S
eism
ic a
nd fl
oodi
ng w
alkd
owns
4.1
–S
tatio
n B
lack
out (
SB
O) r
egul
ator
y ac
tions
4.2
–M
itiga
ting
stra
tegi
es fo
r bey
ond
desi
gn b
asis
eve
nts
5.1
–R
elia
ble
hard
ened
ven
ts fo
r Mar
k I a
nd II
con
tain
men
ts
7.1
–S
pent
fuel
poo
l ins
trum
enta
tion
8
–S
treng
then
& In
tegr
ate
EO
Ps,
SA
MG
s, &
ED
MG
s
9.3
–E
nhan
ced
EP
sta
ffing
and
com
mun
icat
ions
6
SEC
Y-12
-002
5 Is
sues
: Tie
r 2 A
ctiv
ities
2.1
–O
ther
Nat
ural
Ext
erna
l Haz
ards
7.2
–P
rovi
de s
afet
y-re
late
d A
C p
ower
to th
e S
FP
mak
eup
syst
em
7.3
–R
evis
e Te
ch S
pecs
to a
ddre
ss e
nhan
ced
in
stru
men
tatio
n an
d ne
w A
C p
ower
requ
irem
ents
7.4
–S
eism
ical
ly q
ualif
ied
spra
y to
SFP
7
STP
3 &
4 F
ukus
him
a R
espo
nse
Act
iviti
es
•N
INA
act
ivel
y pa
rtici
pate
s in
the
indu
stry
to u
nder
stan
d an
d re
spon
d to
the
Fuku
shim
a ev
ent:
�M
aint
ains
tech
nica
l ser
vice
s ag
reem
ent w
ith T
EP
CO
�P
artic
ipat
es w
ith in
dust
ry g
roup
s (e
.g. B
WR
OG
, EP
RI,
NE
I)�
Col
labo
rate
s w
ith S
TP U
nits
1 &
2�
Col
labo
rate
s w
ith T
oshi
ba/T
AN
E to
und
erst
and
Japa
nese
re
spon
se�
Mai
ntai
ns a
focu
sed
resp
onse
team
org
aniz
atio
n
8
STP
3 &
4 F
ukus
him
a R
espo
nse
Team
Org
aniz
atio
n
Fuku
shim
a R
espo
nse
Team
NIN
A P
roje
ct M
anag
erS
teve
Tho
mas
2.1,
2.3
Fl
ood,
Sei
smic
&
Ext
erna
l Haz
ards
8.0,
8.1
, 8.2
,8.
3, 8
.4E
OP’
s, S
AM
G’s
, an
d E
DM
G’s
9.3,
9.4
SBO
Em
erge
ncy
Pro
cedu
res
Fuku
shim
a R
espo
nse
Team
TAN
E P
roje
ct M
anag
erFu
kush
ima
Res
pons
e Te
amS
TP 1
&2
Pro
ject
Man
ager
BWR
OG
EPR
I
7.0,
7.1
, 7.2
,7.
3, 7
.4, 7
.5S
pent
Fue
l Poo
lIn
stru
men
tatio
n
5.1
Rel
iabl
e H
arde
ned
Vent
4.1,
4.2
SBO
Cop
ing
Cap
abilit
yA
nd E
quip
men
tP
erfo
rman
ce
9
Ove
rvie
w o
f STP
3 &
4 A
BW
R
10
STP
3 &
4 A
BW
R
•R
educ
ed ri
sk o
f cor
e da
mag
e ev
ents
. A
BW
R c
ore
dam
age
frequ
ency
(1.6
x10-
7pe
r rea
ctor
yea
r) is
lo
wer
than
pre
viou
s ge
nera
tion
BW
Rs
(~1x
10-5
)
•S
TP 3
& 4
inco
rpor
ated
the
Airc
raft
Impa
ct
Am
endm
ent i
nclu
ding
oth
er m
itiga
tive
feat
ures
that
fu
rther
redu
ce ri
sk
•H
ighl
y re
liabl
e E
CC
S S
yste
m w
ith d
iver
se h
ardw
ired
cont
rols
11
�D
esig
n fe
atur
es th
at a
ddre
ss F
ukus
him
a-lik
e ev
ents
:�
Impr
oved
Rea
ctor
Cor
e Is
olat
ion
Coo
ling
syst
em (R
CIC
) tu
rbin
e/pu
mp
�S
BO
miti
gatio
n ca
pabi
litie
s �
Com
bust
ion
Turb
ine
Gen
erat
or (C
TG)
�Th
ree
Trai
ns o
f Saf
ety
Rel
ated
Mak
eup
to S
pent
Fue
l Poo
l (S
FP)
�A
C In
depe
nden
t Wat
er A
dditi
on (A
CIW
A) (
Die
sel F
ire P
ump)
�Fi
re T
ruck
, Por
tabl
e D
iese
l-Driv
en P
umps
(2)
�Th
ree
Em
erge
ncy
Die
sel G
ener
ator
s (E
DG
s)
�B
urie
d E
DG
Fue
l Oil
tank
s�
Con
tain
men
t Ove
rpre
ssur
e P
rote
ctio
n S
yste
m (C
OP
S)
�A
ltern
ate
Spe
nt F
uel P
ool M
ake-
up W
ater
& S
pray
s�
Alte
rnat
e Fe
edw
ater
Inje
ctio
n (A
FI)
STP
3 &
4 A
BW
R F
eatu
res
12
AB
WR
Impr
oved
Fea
ture
s
RP
V w
ater
leve
l pos
t-blo
wdo
wn
2/3
core
hei
ght w
ith s
pray
coo
ling
Hyd
raul
ical
ly o
pera
ted
cont
rol r
ods
with
sin
gle
rod
oper
atio
n
2 E
xter
nal r
ecirc
loop
s�
Var
iabl
e re
circ
pum
ps�
Flow
con
trol v
alve
s
BW
RA
BW
R
Rec
irc F
low
No
Ext
erna
l Rec
ircLo
ops
10 In
tern
al re
circ
pum
ps
Con
trol R
od D
rive
Hyd
raul
ic a
nd e
lect
rical
inse
rtion
Fine
mot
ion
cont
rol r
od d
rives
LOC
A D
esig
nR
PV
wat
er le
vel p
ost-b
low
dow
nab
ove
top
of a
ctiv
e fu
el (T
AF)
No
larg
e bo
re p
ipe
RP
V
pene
tratio
ns b
elow
TA
F
13
AB
WR
Impr
oved
Fea
ture
s (c
ontin
ued)
�R
ecirc
Pum
p Tr
ip (R
PT)
�A
ltern
ate
Rod
Inse
rtion
(AR
I) �
Aut
o S
tand
by L
iqui
d C
ontro
l S
yste
m (S
LCS
) ini
tiatio
n
1 or
2 d
ivis
ion
high
pre
ssur
e +
2 di
visi
ons
core
spr
ay a
nd lo
w
pres
sure
floo
ding
BW
R
3 di
visi
ons
high
pre
ssur
e �
2 H
PC
F
�1
RC
IC+
3 di
visi
ons
low
pre
ssur
e flo
odin
g�
3 LP
CF
ECC
S
AB
WR
ATW
S M
itiga
tion
Feat
ures
�R
PT
�A
RI
�A
uto
SLC
S in
itiat
ion
�Fi
ne M
otio
n C
ontro
l Rod
D
rive
auto
run-
in�
Aut
o fe
edw
ater
pum
p ru
nbac
k
14
AB
WR
Impr
oved
Fea
ture
s (c
ontin
ued)
Con
tain
men
t Ove
rpre
ssur
e P
rote
ctio
n S
yste
m (C
OP
S)
All
BW
R M
ark
I con
tain
men
ts h
ave
vario
usly
des
igne
d ha
rden
ed v
ents
Har
dene
d Ve
nt
Var
ies
Var
ies
Var
ies
from
4 to
8 h
ours
BW
R
CTG
(one
per
Uni
t) pl
us in
stal
led
cros
s tie
sA
ltern
ate
AC
Sou
rce
AB
WR
Sta
tion
Bla
ckou
t10
min
read
y to
load
on
Com
bust
ion
Turb
ine
Gen
erat
or
(CTG
)
72 h
r w/o
CTG
Spen
t Fue
l Poo
lTh
ree
train
s of
mak
eup
with
saf
ety
rela
ted
pow
er
Sei
smic
ally
-qua
lifie
d ex
tern
al
conn
ectio
ns o
n op
posi
te s
ides
of
the
Rea
ctor
Bui
ldin
g pr
ovid
e co
olin
g w
ater
and
spr
ays
15
AB
WR
Sev
ere
Acc
iden
t Miti
gatio
n Fe
atur
es
�In
erte
dpr
imar
y co
ntai
nmen
t
�Lo
wer
dry
wel
l flo
od c
apab
ility
�Lo
wer
dry
wel
l Bas
altic
con
cret
e
�S
uppr
essi
on p
ool -
fissi
on p
rodu
cts
scru
bbin
g an
d re
tent
ion
�P
assi
ve h
arde
ned
vent
(CO
PS
) fro
m th
e su
ppre
ssio
n ch
ambe
r
�D
ryw
ell s
umps
cor
ium
shi
eld
�A
C In
depe
nden
t Wat
er A
dditi
on
(AC
IWA
) sys
tem
DRY
WELL�CO
NNEC
TING�
VENT
DRY
WELL�HEA
D
PRIM
ARY
�CO
NTA
INMEN
T�VE
SSEL D
IAPH
RAGM�
FLOOR
SUPP
RESS�
CHAMBE
R�AIRSPACE
(WETWELL)
SPILLO
VER�
VENT
16
STP
3 &
4 E
nhan
cem
ents
�R
CIC
Tur
bine
/Pum
p�
Sim
plifi
ed d
esig
n �
Wat
er lu
bric
ated
�R
HR
Sys
tem
and
Spe
nt F
uel P
ool C
oolin
g�
Any
of t
he th
ree
RH
R lo
ops
can
supp
ly fu
el
pool
coo
ling
and
mak
eup
�A
ltern
ate
Feed
wat
erIn
ject
ion
�M
itiga
tive
Stra
tegi
es
17
Cor
e D
amag
e Fr
eque
ncy
-Int
erna
l Eve
nts
AB
WR
EPR
I A
LWR
Goa
l
Gra
nd
Gul
fPe
ach
Bot
tom
Surr
ySe
quoy
ah
BW
R P
lant
s
NU
REG
115
0 St
udy
PWR
Pla
nts
1.6x
10-7
1.0x
10-5
4.0x
10-6
4.5x
10-6
4.0x
10-5
5.7x
10-5
10�7
10�6
10�5
10�4
10�3
AB
WR
D
CD
R
ev. 4
2.9x
10-7
AP1
000
AP1
000
DC
D re
v 19
18
STP
3 &
4 C
apab
ilitie
s &
SEC
Y-12
-002
5
19
SEC
Y-12
-002
5 Is
sues
: Ti
er 1
Act
iviti
es
2.1
–S
eism
ic a
nd fl
oodi
ng re
eval
uatio
ns
2.3
–S
eism
ic a
nd fl
oodi
ng w
alkd
owns
4.1
–S
tatio
n B
lack
out (
SB
O) r
egul
ator
y ac
tions
4.2
–M
itiga
ting
stra
tegi
es fo
r bey
ond
desi
gn b
asis
eve
nts
5.1
–R
elia
ble
hard
ened
ven
ts fo
r Mar
k I a
nd II
con
tain
men
ts
7.1
–S
pent
fuel
poo
l ins
trum
enta
tion
8
–S
treng
then
& In
tegr
ate
EO
Ps,
SA
MG
s, &
ED
MG
s
9.3
–E
nhan
ced
EP
sta
ffing
and
com
mun
icat
ions
20
SEC
Y-12
-002
5 Is
sues
: Tie
r 2 A
ctiv
ities
2.1
–O
ther
Nat
ural
Ext
erna
l Haz
ards
7.2
–P
rovi
de s
afet
y-re
late
d A
C p
ower
to th
e S
FP m
akeu
p sy
stem
7.3
–R
evis
e Te
ch S
pecs
to a
ddre
ss e
nhan
ced
inst
rum
enta
tion
and
new
AC
pow
er re
quire
men
ts
7.4
–S
eism
ical
ly q
ualif
ied
spra
y to
SFP
21
The
STP
Site
and
Vic
inity
STP
3 &
4
Gul
f of M
exic
o
22
2.1
Site
Cha
ract
eris
tics
for F
lood
ing
•D
esig
n B
asis
Flo
od(S
RP
2.4
.2, 2
.4.3
, 2.4
.4, 2
.4.5
and
2.4
.6)
�P
rese
nt-d
ay re
gula
tory
gui
danc
e an
d m
etho
dolo
gies
wer
e us
ed to
ev
alua
te fl
oodi
ng h
azar
ds fo
r the
STP
3 &
4 s
ite a
s di
scus
sed
inC
OLA
P
art 2
, Tie
r 2, S
ubse
ctio
n 2.
4S.
�Th
e de
sign
bas
is fl
ood
elev
atio
n fo
r the
STP
3 &
4 s
ite w
as
dete
rmin
ed b
y co
nsid
erin
g th
e va
rious
floo
ding
sce
nario
s re
quire
d by
th
e S
tand
ard
Rev
iew
Pla
n (S
RP
) sec
tions
list
ed a
bove
.�
Floo
ding
sce
nario
s w
ere
inve
stig
ated
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith o
ther
floo
ding
an
d m
eteo
rolo
gica
l eve
nts,
suc
h as
win
d ge
nera
ted
wav
es a
nd ti
dal
leve
ls, a
s re
com
men
ded
in A
NS
I/AN
S 2
.8 -1
992.
�A
max
imum
floo
d el
evat
ion
of 3
8.8
ft M
ean
Sea
Lev
el (M
SL)
was
de
term
ined
as
a re
sult
of th
e an
alys
is (M
CR
bre
ach)
. �
Bas
ed o
n th
is a
naly
sis,
the
Des
ign
Bas
is F
lood
was
con
serv
ativ
ely
esta
blis
hed
as 4
0 ft
MS
L
23
Num
bers
repr
esen
t ele
vatio
ns (m
easu
red
in fe
et) a
bove
Mea
n S
ea L
evel
(Dra
win
g no
t to
scal
e)
Uni
t 3 &
4 S
ite G
rade
+49 +28
+65.75
+25
+29
+34
+22
+30
+30
MCR
�Embankmen
t Toe�Ditch
Power�Block�Area
North�Ditch
24
2.1
STP
3 &
4 S
ite F
lood
Lev
els
Floo
d
Res
ultin
g Fl
ood
Leve
l Ele
vatio
n (ft
abo
ve M
SL)
Mar
gin
To D
esig
n B
asis
Flo
od L
evel
(ft)
Des
ign
Bas
is F
lood
Lev
el40
.0---
Mai
n C
oolin
g R
eser
voir
Emba
nkm
ent
B
reac
h38
.81.
2
Loca
l Pro
babl
e M
axim
um P
reci
pita
tion
(PM
P)36
.63.
4
Cas
cadi
ng D
ams
on th
e C
olor
ado
Riv
er34
.45.
6
Prob
able
Max
imum
Sur
ge a
nd S
eich
e (P
MSS
)31
.18.
9
Prob
able
Max
imum
Flo
od (P
MF)
on
Stre
ams
and
Riv
ers-
Col
orad
o R
iver
26.3
13.7
Prob
able
Max
imum
Tsu
nam
i (PM
T)11
.528
.5
Wat
er L
evel
Abo
ve
Gra
de E
leva
tion
34 ft
(MSL
)
6.0
4.8
2.6
0.4
-2.9
-7.7
-22.
5
25
2.1
Site
Cha
ract
eris
tics
for F
lood
ing
•“C
liff E
dge
Effe
ct”i
s no
t of c
once
rn fo
r the
se U
nits
3 &
4 F
lood
Sce
nario
s.
Sce
nario
s no
t dis
cuss
ed h
ave
sign
ifica
ntly
gre
ater
mar
gin
with
resp
ect t
o th
e D
esig
n B
asis
Flo
od.
�M
ain
Coo
ling
Res
ervo
ir E
mba
nkm
ent B
reac
h�
Em
bank
men
t bre
ach
is n
ot a
cre
dibl
e ev
ent a
s de
scrib
ed in
Uni
ts 1
& 2
UFS
AR
S
ectio
n 2.
4.4.
1.1.
3 an
d in
Uni
ts 3
and
4 C
OLA
Par
t 2, T
ier 2
Sub
sect
ion
2.4S
.4.1
.2.
�H
isto
rical
beh
avio
r of r
olle
d-ea
rth fi
ll em
bank
men
ts in
dica
tes
that
the
failu
re o
f the
em
bank
men
t dur
ing
a se
ism
ic e
vent
is e
xtre
mel
y un
likel
y. A
sei
smic
eva
luat
ion
of
the
emba
nkm
ent w
as p
erfo
rmed
as
desc
ribed
in U
nits
1 &
2 U
FSA
R S
ectio
n 2.
4.4.
1.1.
3�
The
wat
er le
vel o
f the
rese
rvoi
r is
stric
tly c
ontro
lled
with
in a
llow
able
lim
its.
�D
esig
n no
rmal
max
imum
ope
ratin
g le
vel i
s el
evat
ion
49 ft
Mea
n S
ea L
evel
(MS
L).
The
top
of th
e sp
illway
gat
es in
the
clos
ed p
ositi
on is
at e
leva
tion
49.5
ft M
SL.
�Th
e em
bank
men
t bre
ach
anal
ysis
per
form
ed w
as c
onse
rvat
ive
in n
atur
e.
�B
reac
h lo
catio
ns s
elec
ted
wer
e cl
oses
t to
safe
ty re
late
d st
ruct
ures
. �
Bre
ach
para
met
ers
wer
e es
timat
ed u
sing
two
diffe
rent
em
piric
al e
quat
ions
from
the
Dam
S
afet
y O
ffice
of t
he U
S B
urea
u of
Rec
lam
atio
n. T
he m
ost c
onse
rvat
ive
brea
ch w
idth
was
co
mbi
ned
with
the
mos
t con
serv
ativ
e br
each
spe
ed .
�A
n in
depe
nden
t ana
lysi
s w
as p
erfo
rmed
con
firm
ing
that
the
desi
gnis
con
serv
ativ
e
�Th
e M
ain
Coo
ling
Res
ervo
ir ha
s be
en in
ser
vice
for m
ore
than
25
year
s.
26
2.1
Site
Cha
ract
eris
tics
for F
lood
ing
(con
tinue
d)
�Lo
cal P
roba
ble
Max
imum
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (P
MP
)�
PM
P is
the
estim
ated
dep
th o
f pre
cipi
tatio
n fo
r a g
iven
dur
atio
n, d
rain
age
area
and
tim
e of
the
year
fo
r whi
ch th
ere
is v
irtua
lly n
o ris
k of
exc
eeda
nce.
The
PM
P fo
r a g
iven
dur
atio
n an
d dr
aina
ge a
rea
appr
oxim
ates
the
max
imum
that
is p
hysi
cally
pos
sibl
e w
ithin
the
limits
of c
onte
mpo
rary
hy
drom
eteo
rolo
gica
lkno
wle
dge
and
tech
niqu
es. (
AN
S 2
.8-1
992)
.�
Loca
l int
ense
pre
cipi
tatio
n is
a m
easu
re o
f the
ext
rem
e am
ount
of w
ater
fallin
g in
the
imm
edia
te
vici
nity
of t
he s
ite, u
sual
ly ta
ken
as th
e on
e-sq
uare
mile
PM
P. (
SR
P 2
.4.2
).�
The
desi
gn b
asis
for t
he lo
cal i
nten
se p
reci
pita
tion
is th
e al
l sea
son
one
squa
re m
ile o
r loc
al P
MP
as
obt
aine
d fro
m th
e U
. S. N
atio
nal W
eath
er S
ervi
ce H
ydro
-Met
eoro
logi
cal R
epor
ts (H
MR
) No.
51
and
52.
�Th
e 5-
min
ute,
1-h
our a
nd 6
-hou
r one
squ
are
mile
rain
fall
dept
hs, 6
.4 in
, 19.
8 in
and
32.
0 in
, res
pect
ivel
y, a
re
used
to d
evel
op th
e ra
infa
ll in
tens
ity d
istri
butio
n of
a 6
-hou
r PM
P de
sign
sto
rm.
�R
esul
ts fr
om th
e m
odel
yie
ld a
wat
er le
vel o
f 36.
6 fe
et M
SL
for t
he U
nit 3
& 4
pla
nt a
rea,
resu
lting
with
a
mar
gin
of 3
.4 fe
et w
ith re
spec
t to
the
desi
gn b
asis
floo
d le
vel
�C
onse
rvat
ism
in th
e lo
cal P
MP
floo
ding
ana
lysi
s:�
Pea
k ru
noff
flow
rate
s fro
m p
ower
blo
ck s
ub-b
asin
s ar
e as
sum
ed to
occ
ur s
imul
tane
ousl
y le
adin
g
to a
hig
her c
ombi
ned
peak
dis
char
ge ra
te�
Pea
k di
scha
rge
flow
to th
e ch
anne
ls is
ass
umed
to re
mai
n w
ithin
the
mod
el b
ound
ary
lead
ing
to
hi
gher
floo
d le
vel
�O
verfl
ow to
adj
acen
t dra
inag
e ar
eas
outs
ide
the
mod
el d
omai
n is
not
allo
wed
27
2.1
Site
Cha
ract
eris
tics
for F
lood
ing
(con
tinue
d)
�C
asca
ding
Dam
s on
the
Col
orad
o R
iver
�56
ups
tream
dam
s on
the
Col
orad
o R
iver
and
its
tribu
tarie
s fa
il in
suc
h a
man
ner t
hat t
heir
flow
, bas
ed
on m
axim
um v
olum
e, w
ould
arri
ve a
t a s
ingl
e si
gnifi
cant
dam
(Buc
hana
n D
am) a
t app
roxi
mat
ely
the
sam
e tim
e tri
gger
ing
the
failu
re o
f tha
t dam
.�
This
dam
bre
ak fl
ow w
ould
then
pro
paga
te d
owns
tream
to th
e ne
xt s
igni
fican
t dam
(Man
sfie
ld D
am),
caus
ing
it to
fail
rele
asin
g th
e w
ater
dow
nstre
am.
�In
add
ition
, the
dam
failu
res
wer
e po
stul
ated
to o
ccur
coi
ncid
ently
with
a 2
-yea
r des
ign
win
d ev
ent a
nd
a 50
0,00
0 cf
sco
nsta
nt fl
ow in
the
river
, whi
ch is
hig
her t
han
the
Sta
ndar
d P
roje
ct F
lood
inflo
w to
B
ucha
nan
Dam
and
the
500-
year
inflo
w to
Man
sfie
ld D
am.
�R
esul
ts o
f the
ana
lysi
s yi
eld
a w
ater
leve
l of 3
4.4
feet
MS
L fo
rthe
Uni
t 3 &
4 p
lant
are
a, re
sulti
ng w
ith a
m
argi
n of
5.6
feet
with
resp
ect t
o th
e de
sign
bas
is fl
ood
leve
l.
�P
roba
ble
Max
imum
Sur
ge a
nd S
eich
e�
Two
diffe
rent
reco
gniz
ed m
etho
ds w
ere
used
to e
stim
ate
the
stor
msu
rge.
The
met
hods
incl
uded
S
UR
GE
and
SLO
SH
with
resp
ectiv
e su
rge
leve
l res
ults
of 2
4.29
ft a
nd 3
1.1
ft M
SL.
�31
.1 ft
MS
L w
as c
onse
rvat
ivel
y se
lect
ed a
s th
e flo
od le
vel d
ue to
sur
ge a
nd s
eich
e. T
his
resu
lt is
a
mar
gin
of 8
.9 ft
with
resp
ect t
o th
e D
esig
n B
asis
Flo
od.
�In
add
ition
, AD
CIR
C w
as u
sed
to v
alid
ate
the
resu
lts o
f the
SU
RG
E a
nd S
LOS
H m
odel
s.�
AD
CIR
C h
as b
een
valid
ated
for r
ecen
t hur
rican
es.
�A
DC
IRC
use
s st
ate
of th
e ar
t top
ogra
phic
al a
nd b
athy
met
ric d
ata.
�A
DC
IRC
is F
EM
A c
ertif
ied
and
is th
e st
anda
rd c
oast
al m
odel
use
d by
the
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Arm
y C
orp
of E
ngin
eers
.�
Win
d fie
ld in
puts
into
AD
CIR
C m
odel
wer
e eq
uiva
lent
to th
ose
desc
ribed
in R
G 1
.221
, “D
esig
n-B
asis
Hur
rican
e an
d H
urric
ane
Mis
sile
s fo
r Nuc
lear
Pow
er P
lant
s”(d
ated
Oct
ober
201
1).
�Th
e A
DC
IRC
met
hod
resu
lted
in th
e su
rge
leve
l rea
chin
g 29
.3 ft
MS
L.
28
2.1
Site
Cha
ract
eris
tics
for S
eism
ic H
azar
d in
the
STP
3 &
4 C
OLA
29
2.1
Site
Cha
ract
eris
tics
for S
eism
ic H
azar
d in
the
STP
3 &
4 C
OLA
Vibr
ator
y G
roun
d M
otio
n (S
RP
2.5.
2, 3
.7.1
, RG
1.2
08, M
arch
200
7)•
Pre
sent
-day
regu
lato
ry g
uida
nce
and
met
hodo
logi
es w
ere
used
to e
valu
ate
seis
mic
ha
zard
s re
lativ
e to
the
STP
3 &
4 s
ite a
s di
scus
sed
in C
hapt
ers
2 an
d 3.
•C
OLA
Par
t 2, T
ier 2
Sub
sect
ion
2.5S
.2 d
escr
ibes
the
eval
uatio
n th
at w
as p
erfo
rmed
in
conf
orm
ance
with
Reg
ulat
ory
Gui
de (R
G) 1
.208
, whi
ch p
rovi
des
acce
ptab
le m
etho
dolo
gy
for: �
cond
uctin
g ge
olog
ical
, geo
phys
ical
, sei
smol
ogic
al, a
nd g
eote
chni
cal i
nves
tigat
ions
; �
iden
tifyi
ng a
nd c
hara
cter
izin
g se
ism
ic s
ourc
es;
�co
nduc
ting
a pr
obab
ilistic
sei
smic
haz
ard
asse
ssm
ent (
PS
HA
); �
dete
rmin
ing
seis
mic
wav
e tra
nsm
issi
on (s
oil a
mpl
ifica
tion)
cha
ract
eris
tics
of s
oil a
nd ro
ck s
ites;
�
dete
rmin
ing
a si
te-s
peci
fic, p
erfo
rman
ce-b
ased
GM
RS
sat
isfy
ing
the
requ
irem
ents
of
10C
FR10
0.23
, and
lead
ing
to th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f a s
ite-s
peci
fic S
SE
to s
atis
fy th
e de
sign
re
quire
men
ts o
f App
endi
x S
to 1
0 C
FR P
art 5
0.
•Th
e C
ertif
ied
Sei
smic
Des
ign
Res
pons
e S
pect
ra (C
SD
RS)
for t
he G
EA
BW
R D
esig
n C
ontro
l Doc
umen
t (D
CD
) is
base
d on
RG
1.6
0 re
spon
se s
pect
ra a
ncho
red
at 0
.3 g
. The
C
SD
RS
env
elop
es th
e G
MR
S.
•Th
e si
te-s
peci
fic S
SE
resp
onse
spe
ctra
for S
TP 3
&4,
as
it ap
pear
s in
the
curre
nt C
OLA
(P
art 2
, Tie
r 2, F
igur
es 3
.7-1
a an
d 3.
7-2a
), en
velo
pe th
e G
MR
S. T
he s
ite-s
peci
fic S
SE
re
spon
se s
pect
ra a
re b
ased
on
RG
1.6
0 an
chor
ed a
t 0.1
3 g
scal
ed u
p in
the
low
freq
uenc
y ra
nge.
30
2.1
Site
Cha
ract
eris
tics
for S
eism
ic H
azar
d in
the
STP
3 &
4 C
OLA
(con
tinue
d)
31
2.1
Site
Cha
ract
eris
tics
for S
eism
ic H
azar
d pe
r CEU
S SS
C
Cen
tral
and
Eas
tern
Uni
ted
Stat
es S
eism
ic S
ourc
e C
hara
cter
izat
ion
for
Nuc
lear
Fac
ilitie
s R
epor
t (Ja
nuar
y 31
, 201
2)•
A s
tudy
of s
eism
ic s
ourc
e ch
arac
teriz
atio
n fo
r Cen
tral a
nd E
aste
rn U
nite
d S
tate
s (C
EU
S) h
as
rece
ntly
bee
n co
mpl
eted
.•
Site
-spe
cific
haz
ard
curv
es fo
r pla
nts
base
d on
CE
US
site
sou
rce
char
acte
rizat
ion
have
not
yet
be
en d
evel
oped
.•
How
ever
, the
CE
US
Site
Sou
rce
Cha
ract
eriz
atio
n R
epor
t doe
s pr
ovid
e de
mon
stra
tion
haza
rd
curv
es (1
Hz,
10
Hz
and
Pea
k G
roun
d A
ccel
erat
ion,
hor
izon
tal m
otio
ns) f
or a
Hou
ston
site
re
lativ
ely
80 m
iles
north
of S
TP.
•A
new
per
form
ance
-bas
ed (R
G 1
.208
) GM
RS
was
cal
cula
ted
base
d on
info
rmat
ion
cont
aine
d in
th
e C
EU
S S
ite S
ourc
e C
hara
cter
izat
ion
Rep
ort f
or H
oust
on, b
ut u
tiliz
ing
STP
site
spe
cific
soi
l am
plifi
catio
n.
�D
emon
stra
tion
haza
rd c
urve
s at
1 H
z, 1
0 H
z an
d P
GA
for a
Hou
ston
rock
site
as
prov
ided
in th
e C
EU
S S
ite
Sou
rce
Cha
ract
eriz
atio
n R
epor
t.�
STP
site
-spe
cific
soi
l am
plifi
catio
n pr
esen
ted
in C
OLA
Par
t 2, T
ier 2
, Cha
pter
2.
•Th
e G
MR
S d
eriv
ed fr
om th
e C
EU
S s
ourc
e ch
arac
teriz
atio
n fo
r Hou
ston
util
izin
g S
TP s
ite s
oil
ampl
ifica
tion
is s
imila
r to
the
desi
gn b
asis
GM
RS
dev
elop
ed fo
r STP
3 &
4 C
OLA
(Par
t 2, T
ier 2
, Fi
gure
2.5
S.2
-52)
, ess
entia
lly c
onfir
min
g th
e or
igin
al w
ork.
•In
sum
mar
y, th
is in
vest
igat
ion
foun
d no
reas
on to
revi
sit t
he s
eism
ic d
esig
n ba
sis
in S
TP 3
& 4
C
OLA
.
32
2.1
Site
Cha
ract
eris
tics
for S
eism
ic H
azar
d pe
r CEU
S SS
C (c
ontin
ued)
33
2.1
Oth
er N
atur
al E
xter
nal H
azar
ds
Hur
rican
e K
atrin
aA
ugus
t 200
5C
ateg
ory
3 (a
t lan
dfal
l)
34
2.1
Oth
er N
atur
al E
xter
nal H
azar
ds
SE
CY
-12-
0025
:�
NTT
F re
com
men
datio
n 2.
1 ex
pand
ed to
incl
ude
“Oth
er N
atur
al E
xter
nal H
azar
ds”
“The
NR
C w
ill un
derta
ke re
gula
tory
act
ions
to e
nsur
e th
at S
SC
sim
porta
nt to
sa
fety
will
with
stan
d ot
her n
atur
al e
xter
nal h
azar
ds. T
hese
oth
er e
xter
nal h
azar
ds
…in
clud
e m
eteo
rolo
gica
l phe
nom
ena
such
as
win
d an
d m
issi
le lo
ads
from
to
rnad
oes
and
hurri
cane
s, m
axim
um ra
infa
ll ra
tes
and
snow
and
ice
load
for r
oof
desi
gn, d
roug
ht a
nd o
ther
low
-wat
er c
ondi
tions
that
may
redu
ce o
r lim
it th
e av
aila
ble
safe
ty-re
late
d co
olin
g w
ater
sup
ply,
ext
rem
e m
axim
um a
nd m
inim
um
ambi
ent t
empe
ratu
res
for n
orm
al p
lant
hea
t sin
k an
d co
ntai
nmen
t hea
t rem
oval
sy
stem
s (p
ost-a
ccid
ent),
and
met
eoro
logi
cal c
ondi
tions
rela
ted
to th
e m
axim
um
evap
orat
ion
and
drift
loss
and
min
imum
wat
er c
oolin
g fo
r the
UH
Sde
sign
.”
�N
RC
sta
ff co
nclu
ded
that
“suf
ficie
nt re
gula
tory
gui
danc
e cu
rren
tly
exis
ts”t
o ev
alua
te th
ese
issu
es.
How
ever
, to
the
exte
nt p
ract
ical
, new
in
form
atio
n ab
out e
vent
s at
Fuk
ushi
ma
shou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
.
35
2.1
Oth
er N
atur
al E
xter
nal H
azar
ds (c
ontin
ued)
•C
OLA
doc
umen
ts S
TP 3
& 4
Site
and
SS
C h
ave
alre
ady
been
eva
luat
ed
agai
nst “
curr
ent r
egul
ator
y gu
idan
ce”f
or e
ach
of th
e fo
llow
ing:
�D
esig
n ba
sis
torn
ado
�S
ever
e W
ind
(100
-Yea
r Win
d S
peed
)�
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (fo
r Roo
f Des
ign)
�A
mbi
ent D
esig
n Te
mpe
ratu
res
�U
ltim
ate
Hea
t Sin
k D
esig
n B
asis
(Low
Wat
er L
evel
)�
Oth
er p
heno
men
a po
tent
ially
sig
nific
ant f
or a
par
ticul
ar s
ite in
clud
e:�
Thun
ders
torm
s an
d Li
ghtn
ing
�W
ater
Spo
uts
�Fo
rest
and
Gra
ss F
ires
�Vo
lcan
ic A
ctiv
ity�
Dro
ught
•R
G 1
.221
“Des
ign
Bas
is H
urric
ane
and
Hur
rican
e M
issi
les
for N
ucle
ar
Pow
er P
lant
s”is
sued
Oct
ober
201
1, b
eing
add
ress
ed in
CO
LA.
•E
valu
atio
n of
“Oth
er N
atur
al E
xter
nal H
azar
ds”d
esig
nate
d Ti
er 2
act
ivity
.
�B
iolo
gica
l Eve
nts
(coo
ling
wat
er a
nd fu
el o
il)�
Fros
t�
Hai
l�
Riv
er D
iver
sion
36
4.1
SB
O R
ulem
akin
g
•S
TP 3
& 4
has
des
ign
feat
ures
that
miti
gate
the
impa
ct o
f SB
O, s
uch
as:
�Th
e us
e of
CTG
sas
alte
rnat
e A
C p
ower
sou
rces
for t
he p
rime
miti
gatio
n ag
ains
t SB
O (C
TG re
ady
to lo
ad in
10
min
utes
). Th
e C
TGs
are
prot
ecte
d ag
ains
t des
ign
flood
ing
and
adve
rse
site
wea
ther
co
nditi
ons.
�B
atte
ry c
apac
ity a
llow
s co
ping
for a
t lea
st 8
hou
rs.
�A
pre
limin
ary
eval
uatio
n in
dica
tes
that
bat
terie
s w
ill la
st in
exc
ess
of
72 h
ours
by
load
-she
ddin
g an
d ba
ttery
cro
ss-ti
es.
37
4.1
SB
O R
ulem
akin
g (c
ontin
ued)
�S
TP 3
& 4
use
s an
adv
ance
d R
CIC
pum
p de
sign
that
min
imiz
es
load
requ
irem
ents
and
the
pote
ntia
l for
pum
p fa
ilure
s:
�In
tern
al w
ater
lubr
icat
ion
�N
o ex
tern
al c
oolin
g w
ater
�N
o m
echa
nica
l sea
l�
No
elec
trica
l con
nect
ions
�In
tegr
al m
echa
nica
l gov
erno
r�
No
baro
met
ric c
onde
nser
�Th
e A
BW
R d
esig
n in
corp
orat
es a
sei
smic
ally
-qua
lifie
d sy
stem
with
an
ext
erna
l per
man
ent d
iese
l-driv
en fi
re p
ump
capa
ble
of p
rovi
ding
w
ater
to th
e R
HR
sys
tem
for c
ore
and
cont
ainm
ent c
oolin
g (A
CIW
A).
An
exte
rnal
con
nect
ion
to A
CIW
A p
rovi
des
the
capa
bilit
y of
tem
pora
rily
conn
ectin
g a
stag
ed w
ater
sup
ply
pum
p (D
CD
Tie
r 1S
ec. 2
.15.
6).
38
AC
Inde
pend
ent W
ater
Add
ition
Stan
dpip
e
LPFL
Pum
pD
iese
lD
riven
Fire
Pum
p(In
stal
led)
Out
door
Fire
Tru
ckC
onne
ctio
nRea
ctor
Bui
ldin
gW
all
Dry
wel
lSp
ray
Dry
wel
l
MO
MO MO
Rea
ctor
Vess
el
MO
V
Wet
wel
lSp
ray
Supp
ly
Tank
39
4.1
SB
O R
ulem
akin
g (c
ontin
ued)
•In
an
exte
nded
loss
of A
C S
cena
rio, S
TP 3
& 4
can
:
�O
pera
te R
CIC
/SR
Vs
for a
t lea
st 8
hou
rs�
Dep
ress
uriz
e an
d sw
itch
to A
CIW
A�
CO
PS
bre
ak d
isk
rupt
ures
at ~
32 h
ours
•R
esul
ts:
�C
ore
cool
ing
and
cont
ainm
ent i
nteg
rity
mai
ntai
ned
in
exce
ss o
f 72
hour
s�
No
core
dam
age
40
UO
2Te
mpe
ratu
re
Loss
of a
ll A
C, R
CIC
Run
s Ei
ght H
ours
, Fire
wat
er A
dditi
on
Prev
ents
Cor
e D
amag
e, R
uptu
re D
isk
Ope
ns
4.1
SB
O R
ulem
akin
g (c
ontin
ued)
41
Dry
wel
l Pre
ssur
e
4.1
SB
O R
ulem
akin
g (c
ontin
ued)
Loss
of a
ll A
C, R
CIC
Run
s Ei
ght H
ours
, Fire
wat
er A
dditi
on
Prev
ents
Cor
e D
amag
e, R
uptu
re D
isk
Ope
ns
42
4.1
SB
O R
ulem
akin
g (c
ontin
ued)
•A
dditi
onal
ly, S
TP 3
& 4
des
ign
incl
udes
redu
ndan
t se
ism
ical
ly-q
ualif
ied
exte
rnal
con
nect
ions
on
oppo
site
sid
es
of th
e R
B to
pro
vide
mak
e-up
wat
er a
nd s
pray
s to
the
SFP
w
ith th
e us
e of
sta
ged
wat
er s
uppl
y pu
mps
(Miti
gativ
eS
trate
gies
).
•S
TP 3
&4
has
sign
ifica
nt b
atte
ry, w
ater
and
die
sel f
uel
capa
citie
s th
at c
an b
e us
ed a
s ne
cess
ary.
43
4.1
SB
O R
ulem
akin
g (c
ontin
ued)
Stor
ed W
ater
* Res
ourc
es A
vaila
ble
to S
TP 3
&4
1 pe
r uni
t94
5,70
0 ga
llons
Supp
ress
ion
Pool
2 to
tal f
or S
TP 3
& 4
11,8
88 g
allo
nsPo
tabl
e W
ater
Sto
rage
Ta
nk
1 pe
r STP
3 &
4 si
te11
8,87
7 ga
llons
Filte
red
Wat
er S
tora
ge
Tank
1 pe
r STP
3 &
4 si
te11
8,87
7 ga
llons
Wel
l Wat
er S
tora
ge T
ank
2 to
tal f
or S
TP 3
& 4
300,
000
gallo
nsFi
re W
ater
Sto
rage
Tan
k
2 to
tal f
or S
TP 3
& 4
200,
770
gallo
nsD
emin
Prov
erTa
nk
2 to
tal f
or S
TP 3
& 4
501,
927
gallo
nsD
emin
eral
ized
Wat
er
Stor
age
Tank
1 pe
r uni
t55
7,40
3 ga
llons
Con
dens
ate
Stor
age
Tank
1 pe
r uni
t2,
060,
542
gallo
nsM
ain
Con
dens
er H
otw
ell
Num
ber
& L
ocat
ion
Vol
ume
Item
*Not
es &
com
men
ts:
1. D
oes
not i
nclu
de S
tora
ge T
anks
util
ized
by
Uni
ts 1
& 2
.2.
Doe
s no
t inc
lude
Ulti
mat
e H
eat S
ink
(UH
S) o
r Mai
n C
oolin
g R
eser
voir
(MC
R).
44
4.1
SB
O R
ulem
akin
g (c
ontin
ued)
Fuel
Oil
Site
Inve
ntor
y
1 pe
r site
(for
bot
h un
its) i
n pr
oxim
ity
to d
iese
l fire
pum
p15
0 ga
ls.
Die
sel F
ire P
ump
(AC
IWA
) Day
Tan
k
1 pe
r uni
t nea
r nor
th e
nd o
f Pro
tect
ed
Are
a to
faci
litat
e fil
ling
from
out
side
PA
600,
000
gals
. Si
te F
uel O
il Ta
nk
1 pe
r uni
t in
prox
imity
to C
TG7,
000
gals
. C
TG F
uel O
il D
ay T
ank
3 pe
r uni
t in
unde
r gro
und
vaul
t so
uth
of R
B80
,000
gal
s.ED
G F
uel O
il St
orag
e Ta
nk
3 pe
r uni
t loc
ated
in R
B4,
000
gals
.ED
G F
uel O
il D
ay T
ank
LO
CA
TIO
NV
olum
eIT
EM
45
4.1
SB
O R
ulem
akin
g (c
ontin
ued)
Stat
ion
Bat
terie
s (p
er u
nit)
•C
lass
1E
–12
5VD
C�
Div
I –
5104
Ah
�D
iv II
–33
44 A
h�
Div
III –
2992
Ah
�D
iv IV
–13
68 A
h
•N
on-C
lass
1E
–12
5VD
C�
Gro
up A
–80
0 A
h�
Gro
up B
–80
0 A
h�
Gro
up C
–80
0 A
h
•N
on-C
lass
1E
–25
0VD
C�
Gro
up A
–60
00 A
h
•N
on-C
lass
1E
–12
5VD
C S
ecur
ity B
atte
ry•
Non
-Cla
ss 1
E –
48V
DC
Com
mun
icat
ions
Bat
tery
46
4.2
AC
-Inde
pend
ent P
umpi
ng C
apab
ility
•In
stal
led
dies
el d
riven
fire
pum
p•
STP
3 &
4 a
lso
inco
rpor
ates
thre
e st
aged
AC
-in
depe
nden
t por
tabl
e pu
mpi
ng s
yste
ms:
�Tw
o pu
mps
(fire
truc
k an
d tra
iler m
ount
ed p
orta
ble
pum
p) p
rovi
de c
ore,
SFP
and
con
tain
men
t coo
ling
wat
er to
the
RH
R s
yste
m v
ia th
e A
CIW
A s
yste
m
shar
ed b
etw
een
Uni
ts 3
& 4
�O
ne p
ump
(trai
ler m
ount
ed p
orta
ble
pum
p) p
rovi
des
wat
er in
the
even
t of t
he lo
ss o
f lar
ge a
reas
sha
red
betw
een
Uni
ts 1
–4
�S
uffic
ient
to a
ddre
ss a
mul
ti-un
it ev
ent
•S
TP 3
& 4
will
impl
emen
t FLE
X
47
5 R
elia
ble
Har
dene
d Ve
nts
(RH
V) &
Eva
luat
e R
HV
for o
ther
con
tain
men
t des
igns
•5.
1 is
not
app
licab
le to
the
AB
WR
•5.
2 to
eva
luat
e R
HV
for o
ther
con
tain
men
t de
sign
s (T
ier 3
)
�Th
e A
BW
R c
ertif
ied
desi
gn in
clud
es a
dvan
ced
cont
ainm
ent v
ent f
eatu
res
such
as:
�P
assi
ve h
arde
ned
vent
ing
capa
bilit
y�
Ven
t pat
h is
not
sha
red
betw
een
plan
ts
�S
TP 3
& 4
is a
par
ticip
atin
g m
embe
r of B
WR
OG
and
is
wor
king
with
the
subc
omm
ittee
on
relia
ble
hard
ened
ven
t des
ign
requ
irem
ents
48
Atm
osph
eric
Con
trol
Sys
tem
and
Rel
iabl
e H
arde
ned
Vent
49
7.1
SFP
Inst
rum
enta
tion
•Th
e A
BW
R C
OLA
has
per
tinen
t SFP
des
ign
feat
ures
:�
SFP
leve
l and
tem
pera
ture
mon
itors
pro
vide
indi
catio
n vi
a th
e pl
ant c
ompu
ter a
nd a
nnun
ciat
e in
the
MC
R. T
he in
stru
men
ts
are
pow
ered
by
non-
Cla
ss 1
E v
ital 1
20 V
AC
, whi
ch is
pro
vide
d by
the
PIP
bus
es, w
hich
are
bac
ked-
up b
y th
e C
TG
(DC
D S
ec. 7
.7.1
.10)
.
�Lo
cal a
rea
radi
atio
n m
onito
rs a
re p
rovi
ded
in th
e vi
cini
ty o
f the
S
FP.
Thes
e m
onito
rs a
nnun
ciat
e lo
cally
and
in th
e M
CR
via
the
plan
t com
pute
r. Th
ey a
re p
ower
ed b
y no
n-C
lass
1E
vita
l 120
V
AC
, whi
ch is
pro
vide
d by
the
PIP
bus
es, w
hich
are
bac
ked-
up
by th
e C
TG (D
CD
Sec
. 12.
3.4.
1).
•A
n ad
ditio
nal i
nstru
men
t will
be
adde
d to
the
desi
gn to
mee
t th
e in
tent
of t
he O
rder
.
50
7.1
SFP
Inst
rum
enta
tion
•Th
e de
sign
of t
he S
FP le
vel i
nstru
men
tatio
n w
ill
inco
rpor
ate
the
follo
win
g fe
atur
es:
�W
ide
rang
e in
dica
tion
from
the
top
of fu
el ra
cks
to th
e to
p of
the
SFP
�R
easo
nabl
e pr
otec
tion
agai
nst m
issi
les
that
may
resu
lt fro
m d
amag
e to
adj
acen
t stru
ctur
es�
Sei
smic
ally
qua
lifie
d an
d su
ppor
ted
�E
nviro
nmen
tally
qua
lifie
d�
Sep
arat
e ch
anne
ls a
nd p
ower
sup
plie
s
51
8 S
tren
gthe
n EO
Ps, S
AM
Gs,
& E
DM
Gs
Stre
ngth
enin
g an
d in
tegr
atio
n of
em
erge
ncy
oper
atio
n pr
oced
ures
(E
OPs
), se
vere
acc
iden
t man
agem
ent g
uide
lines
(SA
MG
s), a
nd
exte
nsiv
e da
mag
e m
itiga
tion
guid
elin
es (E
DM
Gs)
.�
STP
3 &
4 d
evel
opm
ent o
f pro
cedu
res
and
guid
elin
es is
an
Ope
ratio
nal P
rogr
am a
nd w
ill fo
llow
Indu
stry
(BW
RO
G, N
EI)
guid
ance
as
end
orse
d by
app
licab
le N
RC
regu
lato
ry g
uide
s, c
onsi
sten
t with
the
Task
For
ce re
com
men
datio
n (S
EC
Y-1
1-01
24).
�S
TP 3
& 4
and
gen
eric
AB
WR
DC
D T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
ns 5
.5.1
.1
refe
renc
e E
OP
tech
nica
l gui
delin
es�
Writ
ten
proc
edur
es s
hall
be e
stab
lishe
d, im
plem
ente
d, a
nd m
aint
aine
d co
verin
g th
e em
erge
ncy
oper
atin
g pr
oced
ures
requ
ired
to im
plem
ent t
he
requ
irem
ents
of N
UR
EG
-073
7 an
d N
UR
EG
-073
7, S
uppl
emen
t 1, a
s st
ated
in G
ener
ic L
ette
r 82-
33.
•Tr
aini
ng d
evel
opm
ent r
equi
rem
ents
will
com
ply
with
rule
mak
ing
for
reco
mm
enda
tion
8.4.
52
9.3
EM
ERG
ENC
Y PR
EPA
RED
NES
S
�S
TP 3
& 4
is e
ngag
ed w
ith N
EI t
hrou
gh S
TAR
S a
nd S
TP
Uni
ts 1
& 2
�E
mer
genc
y P
lan
(EP
) is
an O
pera
tiona
l Pro
gram
to b
e im
plem
ente
d by
STP
Nuc
lear
Ope
ratin
g C
ompa
ny
(STP
NO
C)
�S
TP 3
& 4
EP
will
be
part
of s
ite-w
ide
plan
for U
nits
1 -
4
�N
RC
reco
mm
enda
tions
will
be
incl
uded
in d
etai
led
proc
edur
es d
evel
oped
in c
once
rt w
ith S
TP 1
& 2
�IT
AA
C re
quire
s im
plem
entin
g pr
oced
ures
to b
e su
bmitt
ed to
N
RC
180
day
s pr
ior t
o fu
el lo
ad
53
Sum
mar
y of
Fuk
ushi
ma
Tier
1 Is
sues S
TP 3
& 4
Sta
tus
Topi
c
STP
3 &
4 is
cap
able
of m
itiga
ting
an
exte
nded
72
hour
SB
O
Sta
tion
Bla
ckou
t4.
1
Fire
truc
k an
d po
rtabl
e pu
mps
are
cu
rren
tly in
des
ign.
Ind
ustry
FLE
X w
ill
be im
plem
ente
d.
Miti
gatin
g S
trate
gies
fo
r Bey
ond
Des
ign
Bas
is
4.2
Not
App
licab
leIT
AA
C w
ill c
onfir
m c
onst
ruct
ion
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith d
esig
n
Sei
smic
/Flo
odin
g W
alkd
owns
2.3
CO
LA d
evel
oped
to la
test
gui
danc
eS
eism
ic/F
lood
ing
2.1
54
Sum
mar
y of
Tie
r 1 F
ukus
him
a Is
sues
(con
tinue
d)
STP
3 &
4 S
tatu
sTo
pic
This
will
be
addr
esse
d as
ope
ratio
nal
prog
ram
in c
once
rt w
ith in
dust
ry a
nd S
TP
Uni
ts 1
and
2
Em
erge
ncy
Pro
cedu
res
addr
ess
Ext
ende
d S
BO
and
Mul
ti-un
it ev
ents
9.3
This
is a
ddre
ssed
as
oper
atio
nal p
rogr
am,
will
follo
w in
dust
ry g
uida
nce
and
will
be
in
conc
ert w
ith S
TP U
nits
1 a
nd 2
Em
erge
ncy
Pro
cedu
res
Rul
emak
ing
8
SFP
leve
l tha
t add
ress
es th
e S
FP O
rder
w
ill b
e ad
ded
in C
OLA
Rev
. 8S
FP
Inst
rum
enta
tion
7.1
CO
PS
is a
pas
sive
and
relia
ble
hard
ened
ve
nt s
yste
mR
elia
ble
Har
dene
d V
ent
5.1
55
Sum
mar
y of
Tie
r 2 F
ukus
him
a Is
sues
Haz
ards
hav
e be
en s
cree
ned
and
eval
uate
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
late
st re
visi
on o
f the
SR
P &
RG
1.
221
Oth
er N
atur
al E
xter
nal
Haz
ards
2.1
STP
3 &
4 S
tatu
sTo
pic
STP
3 &
4 d
esig
n ha
s in
stal
led
redu
ndan
t sta
ndpi
pes
SFP
Spr
ay7.
4
At l
east
one
ED
G a
nd R
HR
su
bsys
tem
are
requ
ired
to b
e O
pera
ble
in a
ll M
odes
One
ED
G a
vaila
ble
whe
n irr
adia
ted
fuel
is in
SFP
7.3
STP
3 &
4 h
as th
ree
safe
ty-re
late
d tra
ins
of m
akeu
pS
afet
y-R
elat
ed A
C P
ower
fo
r SFP
Mak
eup
7.2
56
Lice
nsin
g St
rate
gy
�Fu
kush
ima
capa
bilit
ies
disc
usse
d in
this
pre
sent
atio
n w
ill b
e do
cum
ente
d in
CO
LA R
ev. 8
�S
uppl
emen
tal A
ppen
dix
1E a
ddre
ssin
g S
EC
Y-1
2-00
25 is
sues
�S
truct
ure
sim
ilar t
o A
ppen
dix
1A, “
TMI I
ssue
s”�
Roa
dmap
to e
xist
ing
sect
ions
of C
OLA
�S
FP le
vel i
nstru
men
tatio
n de
tails
�S
TP 3
& 4
will
con
tinue
to a
ctiv
ely
parti
cipa
te w
ith O
wne
rs G
roup
s,
NE
I, an
d IN
PO
as
Fuku
shim
a re
spon
se c
ontin
ues
to e
volv
e.�
Em
erge
ncy
Pla
nnin
g an
d in
tegr
atio
n of
EO
Ps,
SA
MG
s, a
nd E
DM
Gs
will
be
done
in c
once
rt w
ith th
e in
dust
ry a
nd S
TP U
nits
1 &
2�
If an
y fu
ture
Fuk
ushi
ma
reco
mm
enda
tions
requ
ire c
hang
es to
S
TP 3
& 4
, the
y w
ill b
e im
plem
ente
d vi
a th
e ap
prop
riate
regu
lato
ry
proc
ess
post
-CO
L.
57
Con
clus
ion Q
uest
ions
and
Com
men
ts
