2012 UH and HPU Kukui Cup Energy Consumption Data: Preliminary Report
description
Transcript of 2012 UH and HPU Kukui Cup Energy Consumption Data: Preliminary Report
(1)
2012 UH and HPU Kukui CupEnergy Consumption Data:
Preliminary Report
Philip JohnsonCollaborative Software Development Laboratory
Information and Computer SciencesUniversity of Hawaii
(2)
UH Data Background Data points at weekly intervals.
Prior to challenge (August):•One data point last week of August
Challenge (Month of September):•Four data points during September.•Orange rectangle highlights interval
Post challenge (October) :•Three data points in October.
(3)
UH Building-level Data
(4)
Lokelani and Mokihana Buildings
Upward trend in consumption.
(5)
Ilima and Lehua Buildings
Lehua "flat" for first 2 weeks, then upward trend
(6)
UH Lounge-level Data
For ease of review, only 2 or 3 lounges per chart
(7)
UH Ilima A, B
Little apparent impact of challenge.
(8)
UH Ilima C, D, E
Ilima-E: flattened for first week, then upward. Ilima-D: flat the whole way through.
(9)
UH Lehua A, B
Little apparent impact of challenge.
(10)
UH Lehua C, D, E
Lehua-D: ~9% decrease from 8/27 to 9/17 (64% participation)
(11)
UH Lokelani A, B
Little apparent impact of challenge. (43%, 9% participation)
(12)
UH Lokelani C, D, E
Little apparent impact of challenge. (50%, 20%, 33% participation)
(13)
UH Mokihana A, B
Little apparent impact of challenge. (28%, 38% participation)
(14)
UH Mokihana C, D, E
Little apparent impact of challenge (38%, 32%, 21% participation)
(15)
HPU Data Background No lounges: all building level.
3 week challenge: •September 17 – October 7•Orange rectangle around interval
Lehua building data•Not available due to meter misconfiguration.
(16)
HPU Lokelani
20% drop from 9/17 to 9/24 (100% participation)
(17)
HPU Mokihana
13% drop from 9/10 to 9/24 (64% participation)
(18)
HPU Melia
Little apparent impact of challenge. (8% participation)
(19)
HPU Kukui
Little apparent impact of challenge. (9% participation)
(20)
HPU Ilima
Little apparent impact of challenge. (9% participation)
(21)
Insight 1: Participation Level of participation is correlated with perceptible change in consumption on weekly basis.
If participation is greater than 60%, then consumption changes perceptibly•UH/Lehua-D: 64% participation, 9% drop•HPU/Mokihana: 64% participation, 13% drop•HPU/Lokelani: 100% participation, 20% drop
(22)
Insight 2: Building level trends UH buildings showed a significant increase in energy consumption from August to October. •Effect of competition was to temporarily "flatten" this increase.
HPU Buildings did not show this trend.•Effect of competition was more significant.
Not sure why there is this difference between UH and HPU.
(23)
HPU building consumption flat
(24)
UH building consumption increased 13%, 19%, 26%, 26%
(25)
Questions?