The Homeless Point in Time Count & Survey Minnesota Coalition for the Homeless Conference 2013.
2012 Point In Time Survey
description
Transcript of 2012 Point In Time Survey
![Page 1: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2012 Point In Time Survey
Homeless Planning Council of Delaware
![Page 2: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Purpose Methodology Summary Statistics Future Plans
Objectives
![Page 3: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Provides a snapshot of the homeless population in a community on one designated night
Required for any community receiving McKinney-Vento funding.
In 2013 requirement will include unsheltered persons (previously unsheltered counts were every other year.
All shelters are encouraged to contribute to the PIT Count (Regardless of funding source or DE CMIS participation).
Purpose
![Page 4: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Who participated in this survey Persons who stayed in the following types of
shelters on January 31st 2012
◦ Emergency◦ Transitional ◦ Permanent Supportive Housing◦ Night-time drop-in
Persons who were using a hotel voucher provided by a state service center
![Page 5: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Data Sources:
◦ DE CMIS◦ Direct Surveys conducted with clients of non- DE
CMIS providers◦ Housing Inventory Survey (includes count for PIT
night, beds available on PIT night, program description)
◦ Note: Unsheltered persons were not included in the 2012 PIT count
Methodology
![Page 6: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Limitations of Data
◦ Missing data – some surveys were more complete than others 270 (20%) missing age 251 (18%) missing gender 307 (14%) missing race
◦ One provider (16 bed transitional housing program) did not participate
◦ The composition (number of programs, program type) of the housing inventory can change from year to year.
◦ Snapshots like the PIT can be prone to aberrations.
![Page 7: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PIT Count0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400 1406 1376
20112012
PIT Counts 2011 VS 2012
![Page 8: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Total Persons Surveyed on PIT Night
Formula:A + ((B*51)*(1-C)) = Annual Estimate
A = Currently Homeless (not including permanent supportive housing)
B = Homeless within last 7 days or entered community in last 7 days
C = % of clients that have had a previous homeless episode in last 12 months
= 6572 persons
![Page 9: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PIT Count0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000 6584 6572
20112012
Annual Estimate 2011 VS 2012
![Page 10: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
County Where ShelteredPIT 2012
Emergency
Night-Time Drop-In
Hotel Vouchers Transitional
Safe Haven PSH Total
Kent 102 4 63 49 218
NCC 302 87 11 330 10 274 1014
Sussex 48 31 43 14 136
Total 452 87 46 436 10 337 1368
Note: 8 persons did not identify the county where sheltered.
![Page 11: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Type of Living Place NCCHouseholds with Children Individuals Emergency Shelter
Emergency Shelter
# of Beds # of Units PIT Count
Utilization Rate # of Beds PIT Count
Utilization Rate
114 40 83 73% 242 173 71% Transitional Housing
Transitional Housing
# of Beds # of Units PIT Count
Utilization Rate # of Beds PIT Count
Utilization Rate
277 91 150 54% 271 180 66%IF Non-reporting beds filled 166 60% Permanent Supportive Housing
Permanent Supportive Housing
# of Beds # of Units PIT Count
Utilization Rate # of Beds PIT Count
Utilization Rate
43 15 30 70% 410 325 79%
87 People were served in the Homeless Café. They are not counted above in Beds or Individuals served.Data is Missing on 16 TH Family Beds.
![Page 12: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Type of Living Place Kent County
Households with Children Individuals Emergency Shelter
Emergency Shelter
# of Beds # of Units PIT Count
Utilization Rate # of Beds PIT Count
Utilization Rate
64 20 42 66% 59 60 102%
Transitional Housing Transitional Housing
# of Beds # of Units PIT Count
Utilization Rate # of Beds PIT Count
Utilization Rate
76 25 67 88% 0 0 0%
Permanent Supportive HousingPermanent Supportive Housing
# of Beds # of Units PIT Count
Utilization Rate # of Beds PIT Count
Utilization Rate
30 10 2 7% 10 27 270%
![Page 13: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Households with Children Individuals
Emergency Shelter Emergency Shelter
# of Beds # of Units PIT CountUtilization
Rate # of Beds PIT CountUtilization
Rate26 8 17 65% 26 27 104%
Transitional Housing Transitional Housing
# of Beds # of Units PIT CountUtilization
Rate # of Beds PIT CountUtilization
Rate53 16 23 43% 23 21 91%
IF Non-reporting beds filled 39 74% Permanent Supportive Housing
Permanent Supportive Housing
# of Beds # of Units PIT CountUtilization
Rate # of Beds PIT CountUtilization
Rate0 0 0 0% 20 16 80%
16 TH Family Beds did not report data during PIT Count
Type of Living Place Sussex County
![Page 14: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Zip Code of Origin!
!
![Page 15: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Zip Code of Origin
!
!
!
![Page 16: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Zip Code of Origin
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
![Page 17: 2012 Point In Time Survey](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56815b3a550346895dc91119/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Demographics 63% Were African American 6% Were Latino/Latina 57% Were Male 27% Have a mental Illness 24% Reported a substance abuse problem 4% Have HIV or AIDS 14% Were Vets 32 % Had been incarcerated at some time