2011/12 Stanford University Budget Plan...Dollars in millions Consolidated Budget 2009-10 Actuals...
Transcript of 2011/12 Stanford University Budget Plan...Dollars in millions Consolidated Budget 2009-10 Actuals...
2011/12Stanford University Budget Plan
Faculty SenateMay 26, 2011
Stanford’s Disclaimer on Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements based oncurrent expectations of future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actualresults to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. In addition, we, throughour management, from time to time make forward-looking public statements concerning our expectedfuture operations and performance and other developments. All of these forward-looking statements aresubject to risks and uncertainties that may change at any time, and, therefore, our actual results may differmaterially from those we expected. We therefore caution against placing substantial reliance on theforward-looking statements contained in this presentation. All forward-looking statements included inthis presentation are made only as of the date of this presentation and we assume no obligation toupdate any written or oral forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf as a result of newinformation, future events or other factors.
Stanford’s Disclaimer on Forward-Looking Statements
1
Thanks
University Budget Group
Adam Daniel, H&S
Harry Elam, H&S
Patti Gumport, Education
Andrea Goldsmith, Engineering
Neil Hamilton, Budget Office
Rosemary Knight, Earth Sciences
Randy Livingston, Business Affairs
Maureen McNichols, GSB
Dana Shelley, Budget Office
Bob Simoni, H&S
Buzz Thompson, Law
Tim Warner, Budget Office
Capital Planning Team
Jack Cleary, Land & Buildings
Megan Davis, Land & Buildings
Stephanie Kalfayan, Academic Affairs
Bob Reidy, Land & Buildings
Suzanne Sangervasi, Land & Buildings
Craig Tanaka, Land & Buildings
Bob Tatum, Engineering
Tim Warner, Budget Office
2
Outline
• Consolidated Budget
• General Funds Budget
• Lessons Learned
• Research Outlook
3
Consolidated Budget for Operations
4
Dollars in millions
Consolidated Budget2009-10Actuals
2010-11Projected
2011-12Budget Plan
1-YearChange
2-YearChange
$658 $694 Student Income $722 4.2% 9.8%
1,139 1,235 Sponsored Research 1,213 -1.7% 6.5%
603 663 Direct Costs - University 650 -2.0% 7.9%
333 346 Direct Costs - SLAC 346 0.0% 4.1%
204 225 Indirect Costs 217 -3.6% 6.4%
506 540 Health Care Services 549 1.7% 8.6%
234 280 Expendable Gifts & Net Assets Released 285 1.8% 21.8%
904 916 Investment Income 987 7.7% 9.1%
855 774 Endowment Income 838 8.3% -1.9%
50 142 Other Investment Income 148 4.8% 197.4%
351 364 Other Income 374 2.9% 6.8%
$3,791 $4,028 Total Revenues $4,131 2.6% 9.0%
1,881 1,988 Salaries and Benefits 2,080 4.6% 10.6%
333 346 SLAC 346 0.0% 4.2%
221 232 Financial Aid 240 3.3% 8.5%
1,063 1,140 Other Operating Expenses 1,158 1.6% 9.0%
$3,497 $3,706 Total Expenses $3,824 3.2% 9.3%
$294 $322 Revenues less Expenses $307
(131) (181) Total Transfers (104)
$164 $141 Revenues less Expenses after Transfers $203
5
Dollars in millions
Consolidated Budget2009-10Actuals
2010-11Projected
2011-12Budget Plan
1-YearChange
2-YearChange
$658 $694 Student Income $722 4.2% 9.8%
1,139 1,235 Sponsored Research 1,213 -1.7% 6.5%
603 663 Direct Costs - University 650 -2.0% 7.9%
333 346 Direct Costs - SLAC 346 0.0% 4.1%
204 225 Indirect Costs 217 -3.6% 6.4%
506 540 Health Care Services 549 1.7% 8.6%
234 280 Expendable Gifts & Net Assets Released 285 1.8% 21.8%
904 916 Investment Income 987 7.7% 9.1%
855 774 Endowment Income 838 8.3% -1.9%
50 142 Other Investment Income 148 4.8% 197.4%
351 364 Other Income 374 2.9% 6.8%
$3,791 $4,028 Total Revenues $4,131 2.6% 9.0%
1,881 1,988 Salaries and Benefits 2,080 4.6% 10.6%
333 346 SLAC 346 0.0% 4.2%
221 232 Financial Aid 240 3.3% 8.5%
1,063 1,140 Other Operating Expenses 1,158 1.6% 9.0%
$3,497 $3,706 Total Expenses $3,824 3.2% 9.3%
$294 $322 Revenues less Expenses $307
(131) (181) Total Transfers (104)
$164 $141 Revenues less Expenses after Transfers $203
6
$0M
$25M
$50M
$75M
$100M
$125M
$150M
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Stanford Fund/President’s FundsGeneral Funds
Undergraduate Need-Based Aid
Does not include athletic scholarships or outside sources
$132$128
$122$122$122$117$115
$103
$75$66
$61
38M
10M
13M
10M
40M
67M
5M
70M 72M
38M
12M19M
16M
98M
29M 21M19M
92M85M80M
14M 16M17M
19MEconomic stress
Endowment Drop
(New Endowment)Endowment
7
Undergraduate Tuition: Who pays?
Government &Other Awards
7%
AthleticScholarships
5%
StanfordFund3%
Endowment,Gifts, Other
12%
Tier IIBuffer
1%
GeneralFunds
4%
Family Resources69%
2000
Government &Other Awards
5%
AthleticScholarships
5%
StanfordFund4%
Endowment,Gifts, Other
18%
Tier IIBuffer
7%
GeneralFunds
3%
Family Resources58%
2011
8
Undergraduate Tuition: Who pays?
Government &Other Awards
7%
AthleticScholarships
5%
StanfordFund3%
Endowment,Gifts, Other
12%
Tier IIBuffer
1%
GeneralFunds
4%
Family Resources69%
2000
Government &Other Awards
5%
AthleticScholarships
5%
StanfordFund4%
Endowment,Gifts, Other
18%
Tier IIBuffer
7%
GeneralFunds
3%
Family Resources58%
2011
Need-Based Aid20%
Need-Based Aid32%
9
Dollars in millions
Consolidated Budget2009-10Actuals
2010-11Projected
2011-12Budget Plan
1-YearChange
2-YearChange
$658 $694 Student Income $722 4.2% 9.8%
1,139 1,235 Sponsored Research 1,213 -1.7% 6.5%
603 663 Direct Costs - University 650 -2.0% 7.9%
333 346 Direct Costs - SLAC 346 0.0% 4.1%
204 225 Indirect Costs 217 -3.6% 6.4%
506 540 Health Care Services 549 1.7% 8.6%
234 280 Expendable Gifts & Net Assets Released 285 1.8% 21.8%
904 916 Investment Income 987 7.7% 9.1%
855 774 Endowment Income 838 8.3% -1.9%
50 142 Other Investment Income 148 4.8% 197.4%
351 364 Other Income 374 2.9% 6.8%
$3,791 $4,028 Total Revenues $4,131 2.6% 9.0%
1,881 1,988 Salaries and Benefits 2,080 4.6% 10.6%
333 346 SLAC 346 0.0% 4.2%
221 232 Financial Aid 240 3.3% 8.5%
1,063 1,140 Other Operating Expenses 1,158 1.6% 9.0%
$3,497 $3,706 Total Expenses $3,824 3.2% 9.3%
$294 $322 Revenues less Expenses $307
(131) (181) Total Transfers (104)
$164 $141 Revenues less Expenses after Transfers $203
10
$0M
$150M
$300M
$450M
$600M
$750M
$900M
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Sponsored Research
Projected Projected
Does not include SLAC
Federal ARRA Directs Non-FederalIndirects ARRA Indirects
PercentFederal82% 83% 82% 82% 81% 80% 77% 71% 75% 74%
882
801
699693697698733
693641
574
862
72%
11
$0M
$150M
$300M
$450M
$600M
$750M
$900M
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Projected Projected
Does not include SLAC
Federal ARRA Directs Non-FederalIndirects ARRA Indirects
PercentFederal82% 83% 82% 82% 81% 80% 77% 71% 73% 72%
817
752
699693697698733
693641
574
841
71%
Sponsored Research without ARRA
12
$0M
$150M
$300M
$450M
$600M
$750M
$900M
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Projected Projected
Does not include SLAC
Federal ARRA Directs Non-FederalIndirects ARRA Indirects
817771
734747769790
850825
781
717
820
Sponsored Research without ARRA, inflation adjusted
PercentFederal82% 83% 82% 82% 81% 80% 77% 71% 73% 72% 71%
13
Dollars in millions
Consolidated Budget2009-10Actuals
2010-11Projected
2011-12Budget Plan
1-YearChange
2-YearChange
$658 $694 Student Income $722 4.2% 9.8%
1,139 1,235 Sponsored Research 1,213 -1.7% 6.5%
603 663 Direct Costs - University 650 -2.0% 7.9%
333 346 Direct Costs - SLAC 346 0.0% 4.1%
204 225 Indirect Costs 217 -3.6% 6.4%
506 540 Health Care Services 549 1.7% 8.6%
234 280 Expendable Gifts & Net Assets Released 285 1.8% 21.8%
904 916 Investment Income 987 7.7% 9.1%
855 774 Endowment Income 838 8.3% -1.9%
50 142 Other Investment Income 148 4.8% 197.4%
351 364 Other Income 374 2.9% 6.8%
$3,791 $4,028 Total Revenues $4,131 2.6% 9.0%
1,881 1,988 Salaries and Benefits 2,080 4.6% 10.6%
333 346 SLAC 346 0.0% 4.2%
221 232 Financial Aid 240 3.3% 8.5%
1,063 1,140 Other Operating Expenses 1,158 1.6% 9.0%
$3,497 $3,706 Total Expenses $3,824 3.2% 9.3%
$294 $322 Revenues less Expenses $307
(131) (181) Total Transfers (104)
$164 $141 Revenues less Expenses after Transfers $203
14
Dollars in millions
Consolidated Budget2009-10Actuals
2010-11Projected
2011-12Budget Plan
1-YearChange
2-YearChange
$658 $694 Student Income $722 4.2% 9.8%
1,139 1,235 Sponsored Research 1,213 -1.7% 6.5%
603 663 Direct Costs - University 650 -2.0% 7.9%
333 346 Direct Costs - SLAC 346 0.0% 4.1%
204 225 Indirect Costs 217 -3.6% 6.4%
506 540 Health Care Services 549 1.7% 8.6%
234 280 Expendable Gifts & Net Assets Released 285 1.8% 21.8%
904 916 Investment Income 987 7.7% 9.1%
855 774 Endowment Income 838 8.3% -1.9%
50 142 Other Investment Income 148 4.8% 197.4%
351 364 Other Income 374 2.9% 6.8%
$3,791 $4,028 Total Revenues $4,131 2.6% 9.0%
1,881 1,988 Salaries and Benefits 2,080 4.6% 10.6%
333 346 SLAC 346 0.0% 4.2%
221 232 Financial Aid 240 3.3% 8.5%
1,063 1,140 Other Operating Expenses 1,158 1.6% 9.0%
$3,497 $3,706 Total Expenses $3,824 3.2% 9.3%
$294 $322 Revenues less Expenses $307
(131) (181) Total Transfers (104)
$164 $141 Revenues less Expenses after Transfers $203
15
Dollars in millions
Consolidated Budget2009-10Actuals
2010-11Projected
2011-12Budget Plan
1-YearChange
2-YearChange
$658 $694 Student Income $722 4.2% 9.8%
1,139 1,235 Sponsored Research 1,213 -1.7% 6.5%
603 663 Direct Costs - University 650 -2.0% 7.9%
333 346 Direct Costs - SLAC 346 0.0% 4.1%
204 225 Indirect Costs 217 -3.6% 6.4%
506 540 Health Care Services 549 1.7% 8.6%
234 280 Expendable Gifts & Net Assets Released 285 1.8% 21.8%
904 916 Investment Income 987 7.7% 9.1%
855 774 Endowment Income 838 8.3% -1.9%
50 142 Other Investment Income 148 4.8% 197.4%
351 364 Other Income 374 2.9% 6.8%
$3,791 $4,028 Total Revenues $4,131 2.6% 9.0%
1,881 1,988 Salaries and Benefits 2,080 4.6% 10.6%
333 346 SLAC 346 0.0% 4.2%
221 232 Financial Aid 240 3.3% 8.5%
1,063 1,140 Other Operating Expenses 1,158 1.6% 9.0%
$3,497 $3,706 Total Expenses $3,824 3.2% 9.3%
$294 $322 Revenues less Expenses $307
(131) (181) Total Transfers (104)
$164 $141 Revenues less Expenses after Transfers $203
16
Endowment Market Value
$0B
$6B
$12B
$18B
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
13.912.6
17.217.2
14.1
12.2
9.9
8.67.6
8.38.9
Endowment value as of June 30
-7.3% -2.6% 8.8% 18.0%39.8% 19.5% 23.4% 6.2% -25.9%19.5% 14.4%
Nominal investment return
17
Endowment Market Value (and Merged Pool)
Endowment value as of June 30; MP values as of August 31
$0B
$6B
$12B
$18B
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
13.912.6
17.217.2
14.1
12.2
9.9
8.67.6
8.3
March 312011
18
Dollars in millions
Consolidated Budget2009-10Actuals
2010-11Projected
2011-12Budget Plan
1-YearChange
2-YearChange
$658 $694 Student Income $722 4.2% 9.8%
1,139 1,235 Sponsored Research 1,213 -1.7% 6.5%
603 663 Direct Costs - University 650 -2.0% 7.9%
333 346 Direct Costs - SLAC 346 0.0% 4.1%
204 225 Indirect Costs 217 -3.6% 6.4%
506 540 Health Care Services 549 1.7% 8.6%
234 280 Expendable Gifts & Net Assets Released 285 1.8% 21.8%
904 916 Investment Income 987 7.7% 9.1%
855 774 Endowment Income 838 8.3% -1.9%
50 142 Other Investment Income 148 4.8% 197.4%
351 364 Other Income 374 2.9% 6.8%
$3,791 $4,028 Total Revenues $4,131 2.6% 9.0%
1,881 1,988 Salaries and Benefits 2,080 4.6% 10.6%
333 346 SLAC 346 0.0% 4.2%
221 232 Financial Aid 240 3.3% 8.5%
1,063 1,140 Other Operating Expenses 1,158 1.6% 9.0%
$3,497 $3,706 Total Expenses $3,824 3.2% 9.3%
$294 $322 Revenues less Expenses $307
(131) (181) Total Transfers (104)
$164 $141 Revenues less Expenses after Transfers $203
19
Dollars in millions
Consolidated Budget2009-10Actuals
2010-11Projected
2011-12Budget Plan
1-YearChange
2-YearChange
$658 $694 Student Income $722 4.2% 9.8%
1,139 1,235 Sponsored Research 1,213 -1.7% 6.5%
603 663 Direct Costs - University 650 -2.0% 7.9%
333 346 Direct Costs - SLAC 346 0.0% 4.1%
204 225 Indirect Costs 217 -3.6% 6.4%
506 540 Health Care Services 549 1.7% 8.6%
234 280 Expendable Gifts & Net Assets Released 285 1.8% 21.8%
904 916 Investment Income 987 7.7% 9.1%
855 774 Endowment Income 838 8.3% -1.9%
50 142 Other Investment Income 148 4.8% 197.4%
351 364 Other Income 374 2.9% 6.8%
$3,791 $4,028 Total Revenues $4,131 2.6% 9.0%
1,881 1,988 Salaries and Benefits 2,080 4.6% 10.6%
333 346 SLAC 346 0.0% 4.2%
221 232 Financial Aid 240 3.3% 8.5%
1,063 1,140 Other Operating Expenses 1,158 1.6% 9.0%
$3,497 $3,706 Total Expenses $3,824 3.2% 9.3%
$294 $322 Revenues less Expenses $307
(131) (181) Total Transfers (104)
$164 $141 Revenues less Expenses after Transfers $203
20
Consolidated Budget by Unit
AcademicUnits74%
AdminUnits19%
Auxiliaries7%
Medicine44%
H&S12%
SLAC11%
Engineering10%
GSB5%
Law 2%
Earth Sciences 2%
Education 1%DoR6%
Libraries 3%
Other 3%
Other is Hoover, VPUE & VPGE
21
Consolidated Budget by Fund Type
Auxiliaries8%Grants & Contracts
24%
Restricted24%
Designated19%
General Funds25%
$4.1B
22
Consolidated Budget by Fund Type
Auxiliaries8%Grants & Contracts
24%
Restricted24%
Designated19%
General Funds25%
$4.1B
$1,041M
CentralObligations
$191M
Non-Formula
Units
$686M
FormulaUnits
$164M
Central Obligations include debt service, insurance, Capital Facilities Fund,
university reserve, UG financial aid, etc.
23
General Funds Budget
24
General Funds Budget 2011-2012
General Funds Budget 2011-2012
General Funds Budget 2011-2012
General Funds Budget 2011-2012
General Funds Budget 2011-2012
General Funds Budget 2011-2012
% of Revenue/Expense
% of Revenue/Expense
TuitionTuition $579.6 55.7%
Indirect Cost RecoveryIndirect Cost Recovery 216.9 20.8%
Investment IncomeInvestment Income 210.2 20.2%
Endowment Income Endowment Income 146.1
Other Investment Income Other Investment Income 64.1
Other IncomeOther Income 33.9 3.3%
Total General Funds RevenueTotal General Funds RevenueTotal General Funds Revenue $1,040.6
Salaries and BenefitsSalaries and Benefits 556.2 65.4%
Financial AidFinancial Aid 31.9 3.8%
Debt ServiceDebt Service 58.4 6.9%
Other Operating ExpensesOther Operating Expenses 203.6 24.0%
Total ExpensesTotal ExpensesTotal Expenses $850.1
Revenues less ExpensesRevenues less ExpensesRevenues less Expenses $190.5
Total TransfersTotal Transfers (151.0)
General Funds SurplusGeneral Funds SurplusGeneral Funds Surplus $39.5
25
Incremental General Funds Allocations
Salary & Benefits$12.2M
Non-Salary$4.9M
Facilities$6.6M
UG Fin Aid$2.3M
IncrementalPrograms$16.3M
AcademicPrograms
$5.3M
Other$1.6M
Administrative$3.5M
Faculty$4M
GradSupport
$1M
StudentLife$1M
Total: $42M
26
Incremental General Funds Allocations
AcademicPrograms
$5.3M
Other$1.6M
Administrative$3.5M
Faculty$4M
GradSupport
$1M
StudentLife$1M
27
Incremental General Funds Allocations
AcademicPrograms
$5.3M
Other$1.6M
Administrative$3.5M
Faculty$4M
GradSupport
$1M
StudentLife$1M
• Reinstate Overseas Seminars in VPUE
• Teaching resources in Language Center and Econ 1A/1B
• Convert UG Education minor from pilot to base
• Array of academic programs in Dean of Research, SULAIR, Law
28
Incremental General Funds Allocations
AcademicPrograms
$5.3M
Other$1.6M
Administrative$3.5M
Faculty$4M
GradSupport
$1M
StudentLife$1M
• Faculty positions in new Geobiology program
• Faculty recruitment support in H&S and Law
• Retention and equity adjustments in H&S
• Continued support for Faculty Incentive Fund and Faculty Development Initiative
29
Incremental General Funds Allocations
AcademicPrograms
$5.3M
Other$1.6M
Administrative$3.5M
Faculty$4M
GradSupport
$1M
StudentLife$1M
• Increased Business Affairs capacity for campus support and global support and compliance
• Modest increases in UG Admissions to cope with continued increase in applications and interest
• Final increment in Development base buildup; increased major gift and international efforts
30
Incremental General Funds Allocations
AcademicPrograms
$5.3M
Other$1.6M
Administrative$3.5M
Faculty$4M
GradSupport
$1M
StudentLife$1M
• Additional support for energy conservation efforts in LBRE
• Add one deputy sheriff in Public Safety
• Additional base support for BeWell program
31
Incremental General Funds Allocations
AcademicPrograms
$5.3M
Other$1.6M
Administrative$3.5M
Faculty$4M
GradSupport
$1M
StudentLife$1M
• Increased support for Student Services Center
• Residential Education enhancements
• Additional Physician Assistant/Nurse Practitioner and CAPS Case Manager in Vaden
• Increased support for Graduate Life Office and Bechtel International Center
32
Incremental General Funds Allocations
AcademicPrograms
$5.3M
Other$1.6M
Administrative$3.5M
Faculty$4M
GradSupport
$1M
StudentLife$1M
• Growth in Education doctoral cohort
• Base funding for Engineering TAs
• Selected student services enhancements
33
Lessons Learned
34
• In good times, we need more discipline adding staff
! 10 year growth in faculty (except SoM) and students has been slow and relatively controlled
! In units funded entirely through General Funds, staff growth has also been relatively slow—limited by available funds
! Staff growth in units with significant non-GF revenue has been large and uncontrolled
! Do we need a billeting system for staff?
• In very bad times, moving quickly is better than “smoothing”
! We had option of one year of sizable cuts vs. 4-5 years of smaller cuts
! Former yields more strategic, thoughtful reductions
Budget Lessons
35
Expendable Funds Buffering Policy
• Buffering policy worked well for normal investment fluctuations (including 2001-2002 downturn)
• With extreme investment losses, policy left General Funds budget exposed to large and immediate drops (>$40M in FY10)
• Policy needed revision
36
Expendable Funds Buffering Policy
• Buffering policy worked well for normal investment fluctuations (including 2001-2002 downturn)
• With extreme investment losses, policy left General Funds budget exposed to large and immediate drops (>$40M in FY10)
• Policy needed revision
New policy puts more buffering risk on sources of one-time funding;
provides more protection for base budget.
37
Endowment Lessons
• In addition to risk profile of portfolio, more attention needs to be given to liquidity of portfolio
! In extreme liquidity crisis, institution can become cash starved
! Even when there is no crisis, less than optimal investment decisions may be forced
! Did not happen to us, thankfully, but could have
• Did we learn that “Yale investment model” is a mistake?
38
Annualized Returns (ending 6/09) vs. Indexes
Stanford Endowment
S&P 500(Domestic Equities)
MSCI EAFE (Foreign Equities)
MSCI REIT(Real Estate)
GSCI (Commodities)
10-year Treasuries
1-year -25.9% -26.2% -31.0% -43.7% -59.7% 7.3%
3-year -1.0% -8.2% -7.5% -18.5% -15.2% 8.2%
5-year 6.8% -2.2% 2.8% -3.0% -3.4% 5.5%
10-year 8.9% -2.2% 1.6% 5.3% 6.3% 5.8%
30-year 16.4% 10.8% 9.6% 3.3% 6.8% 8.2%
39
Endowment Lessons
• In addition to risk profile of portfolio, more attention needs to be given to liquidity of portfolio
! In extreme liquidity crisis, institution can become cash starved
! Even when there is no crisis, less than optimal investment decisions may be forced
! Did not happen to us, thankfully, but could have
• Did we learn that “Yale investment model” is a mistake?
No(though we should continually
assess mix/risk/liquidityof portfolio)
40
Research Outlook
41
What will happen if the Federal research budget remains flat for 5 years
(and our share remains the same)?
42
... to Graduate Students?
... to Postdocs?
... to Indirect Cost Recovery?
... to the rest of us?
43
Assuming flat research funding
$0M
$150M
$300M
$450M
$600M
$750M
$900M
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Assumes non-federal research grows at 4.5% nominal
Federal Non-Federal Indirects
817
752
699693697
841
Sponsored Research (Projection)without ARRA
849 857 866 876 885
44
Assuming flat research funding
$0M
$150M
$300M
$450M
$600M
$750M
$900M
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Assumes non-federal research grows at 1.5% real
Federal Non-Federal Indirects
817771
734747769
820
Sponsored Research (Projection)without ARRA; inflation adjusted
803771 756 741
-14%
-10%787
45
Graduate Student Enrollment (Historical)
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Doctoral Masters Professional Annual growth rate2001-2011
1.75%
1.29%
.39%
3721
44254134
2276 23202586
1703 1720 1768
46
Assuming flat research funding
$0M
$90M
$180M
$270M
$360M
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
7577808285878785858185
146144143141140138138130131107103
8483828180797977758475
Graduate Student Funding (Projection)inflation adjusted
General Funds Designated & Restricted Grants & Contracts
263272
291 293304 305 305 305 304 304 304
Assumes 1% real growth in Designated, Restricted, and General Funds
47
Assuming flat research funding
Graduate Student Enrollment (Projection)
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Doctoral Masters Professional
0%
1.29%
.39%
Annual growth rate2012-2017
2301
4180
1720
44254425
26192793
1775 1810
2586
1768
4425
48
Graduate Students
• Effects would largely be limited to doctoral (PhD) students
• Global impact would be dampened by growth in other graduate funding
• Local disruption inevitable due to lack of fungibility of some funds
• At best, total number of doctoral students would remain level
...but would decline if cost per graduate student exceeds inflation
49
Postdoc Numbers (Historical)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Annual growth rate2001-2009
2.09%
1281
1888*
13911512
14121576
* 2010 & 2011 anomalous due to one-time suspension of 5 year postdoc limit
50
Assuming flat research funding
$0M
$30M
$60M
$90M
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
5152545557596164
545351
2625252525242122231423
22222222291
Postdoc Funding (Projection)inflation adjusted
General Funds Designated & Restricted Grants & Contracts
75 7679
8884 85 84 82 81 80 78
Assumes 1% real growth in Designated, Restricted, and General Funds
51
Assuming flat research funding
Postdoc Numbers (Projection)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
146216051576
1474-1.7%
Annual growth rate2012-2017
52
Postdocs
• Effects would not be dampened by other funding
• Since postdoc funding is not fungible, effects would be entirely in science and engineering fields
• Decreases in postdoc numbers would be inevitable
• Similar effect likely for research staff positions
53
Indirect Cost Recovery
To understand potential effect on Indirect Cost Recovery, first need to understand
how it works.
54
Indirect Cost Recovery
Other3%
Investment Income
20%
Indirect Cost Recovery
21%
Tuition56%
General Funds$1.0B
$100 “Direct” cost of
research*
$58 Indirect cost recovery
Current IndirectCost Rate = 58%
37%
63%
* Certain direct research costs excluded from IDCR calculation
Research Grant
55
Indirect Cost Recovery
Other3%
Investment Income
20%
Indirect Cost Recovery
21%
Tuition56%
General Funds$1.0B
Utilities, O&M on research buildings
Research administration
Research compliance
...
56
Indirect Cost Rate Calculation
Facilities Rate
Admin Rate(Capped at 26%)*
+
Total Indirect CostRate
=
=
Facilities Costs (Utilities + O&M)
Research Base
Administrative Costs
Research Base
* Results in under recovery of full cost of research, even on grants paying “full” overhead charge
57
Indirect Cost Recovery
Two final points:
1. Indirect Cost Rate is recalculated (renegotiated) every two years. During these two years, the rate is fixed.
2. When rate is recalculated, new research base is estimated based on latest research volume.
58
Indirect Cost Recovery
• In first two years, as research volume stagnates, IDCR will as well, reducing this source of General Funds
• Equivalent to a 6% reduction in IDCR over two years, roughly $12 million hit to General Funds
• Can be managed with our planned General Funds surplus
• When Indirect Rate is recalculated, higher facilities costs (due to inflation) without increased research volume, would increase the negotiated rate
• Would yield (partial) recovery of General Funds revenue, but place added overhead burden on research grants
• Would worsen under recovery of indirect research costs, due to capped administrative rate
• Net effect after 5 years could be up to 4.5 points added to the rate (e.g., raising current rate of 58% to 62.5%)
59
Other Effects
• Even more unsuccessful grant applications; more effort writing grants
• Pressure on faculty salaries (summer support; salary offsets; base salaries in School of Medicine)
• More reliance on other funding sources (which generally do not pay full indirect cost rate)
• Less research accomplished
60
But remember:
Historically, Stanford’s share of federal research has increased when funding
became tight.
61
End
62