2011 HSGP Grant

Michigan State PoliceEmergency Management and Homeland Security Division

Mr. Sam Jonker-Burke

Mr. Mike Curtis

April 30, 2012

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 2

Goals Today

• FY 2011 Priorities

• 2011 changes

• Existing requirements

• Answer Questions

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 3

FY 2011 Priorities

• Priority One – Whole Community

• Priority Two – Building Prevention and Protection Capabilities

• Priority Three – Maturation and Enhancement of State and Major Urban Area Fusion Centers

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 4

Changes• Organization – Typing of Equipment and Training

– State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) and Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) provide funding for equipment, training, and exercises for the prevention, protection against, response to, and recovery from terrorism events○ All equipment and training procured under this grant must be

in support of the development or maintenance of an identified team or capability described and typed under the National Incident Management System (NIMS) where such typing guidance exists as published by Federal Emergency Management Agency) FEMA

○ All grantees will report what equipment was purchased and what typed capability it supports in the Biannual Strategy Implementation Report (BSIR)

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 5

Changes (Cont.)

• Organization – Typing of Equipment and Training Cont.○ All grantees will report in the BSIR the number of

people trained in a given capability to support a reported number of defined resource typed teams (e.g., 63 responders were trained in structural collapse to support 23 Type 2 Urban Search and Rescue [USAR] Teams)

○ All grantees will report the total number of a defined type of resource and capabilities built utilizing the resources of this grant as part of the BSIR

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 6

Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Activities (LETPA)

• Per the 9/11 Act, States are required to ensure that at least 25 percent (25%) of SHSP appropriated funds and 25 percent (25%) of UASI appropriated funds are dedicated towards law enforcement terrorism prevention-oriented planning, organization, training, exercise, and equipment activities (LETPA)

• Actual dollar amount is listed in the grant agreements

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 7

LETPA (Cont.)

• Funds leveraged toward LETPA must prioritize activities associated with Priorities Two and Three, in particular those activities that focus on:○ Building Prevention and Protection

Capabilities○ Maturation and Enhancement of State and

Major Urban Area Fusion Centers

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 8

Grant Guidance

• Use of SHSP and UASI funds must be consistent with and supportive of implementation of the State Homeland Security Strategy. Linkages between specific projects undertaken with SHSP and UASI funds and strategic goals and objectives will be highlighted through regular required reporting mechanisms, including the BSIR

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 9

Grant Guidance (Cont.)• Activities implemented under SHSP must

support terrorism preparedness by building or enhancing capabilities that relate to the prevention of, protection from, response to, and recovery from terrorism in order to be considered eligible. However, many capabilities which support terrorism preparedness simultaneously support preparedness for other hazards. Grantees must demonstrate this dual-use quality for any activities implemented under this program that are not explicitly focused on terrorism preparedness.

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 10

FY 2011 Regional Investment Projects

• Eight (8) investments were developed using Goals and Objectives from the State and Regional Homeland Security Strategies

• Each region has been provided an index that identifies which Goals and Objectives from their Regional Homeland Security Strategy support which investment(s)

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 11

FY 2011 Regional Investment Projects (Cont.)

• The index can be used to easily determine which investment the region is working towards accomplishing by completing a specified objective

• Investment Projects start on page 27 of the FY 2011 Michigan Supplemental Guidance

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 12

Investment Project Review (page 28 of Regional Guidance)

Each Investment Project includes: • Header with corresponding title / state

investment #

• National Priorities and Target Capabilities best supported by the Investment Project are identified (Note: best supported; i.e. list is not necessarily exhaustive)

• Investment description summary

• Investment Project (IP) Description / Implementation Activities

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 13

Investment Project Review (Cont.)

• Using a different Investment○ A region may choose to tie a strategic goal or

objective to an investment other than the one identified in the index if the region determines one of the goals/objectives is better reflected in another investment and/or that the identified investment does not fully accomplish the intent of the specific objective(s)

• Region must provide a rationale in the form to explain how the identified goal / objective supports accomplishment of the overall mission of the selected investment

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 14

Regional Investment Project Projections (RIPP)

• Must include Investment Projects listed on the Region specific indexes

• Include funding dedicated with timeline

• Include any additional Investment Projects that the Region ties their RHSS to and that are not listed on the index

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 15

Regional Investment Project Projections (RIPP) (Cont.)

• Summary due by June 29, 2012

• Send completed sheet electronically to:

emd_hsgp@michigan.gov

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 16

Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) Review

• Any activities that have been initiated without the necessary EHP review and approval will result in a non-compliance finding and will not be eligible for FEMA funding

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 17

EHP Review (Cont.)

• When required, including but not limited to:○ Interior / Exterior Installations○ Installing new structures○ Ground disturbance

• Timeline:○ 2-3 Months for most interior installations○ 2-3 Months for most installations on existing

structures○ 2-12 Months (or longer) for new structures or

ground disturbance

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 18

Review process

• The Project Justification (PJ) and Allowable Cost Justification (ACJ) forms have been combined

• The new form is called the Alignment and Allowability Justification form

• The investment is now the project

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 19

QUESTIONS?

http://www.michigan.gov/emhsd 20

Contact Information

Mr. Sam Jonker-BurkeJonkerBS@michigan.gov(517) 333-4195

Mr. Mike CurtisCurtism9@michigan.gov (517) 333-5039

Ms. Renee Tober

ToberR2@michigan.gov

(517) 333-5030