2011 06 16 BROWN 202268 SDC1

1
2 3 4 5 6 7 40 50 60 70 80 log FT Age(year) Infected Not infected Infectedregression Not infectedregression 2 3 4 5 6 40 50 60 70 80 log SH BG Age(year) Infected Not infected Infectedregression Not infectedregression A B Figure – Supplemental Digital Content 1 - This figure demonstrates the log FT and SHBG by HIV status and age. FT was higher in HIV-uninfected individuals and decreased with age. The FT in an HIV-infected man was equivalent to the FT in an HIV-uninfected man 13 years older (β HIV-infected v. uninfected status: -0.13 (p < 0.001); β age: -0.01 (p < 0.0001)). SHBG was lower in HIV-uninfected individuals and increased with age. The SHBG in an HIV- infected man was equivalent to the SHBG in an HIV-uninfected man 20 years older (β HIV- infected v. uninfected status: 0.20 (p < 0.0001); β age: 0.01 (p < 0.0001)).

description

- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 2011 06 16 BROWN 202268 SDC1

Page 1: 2011 06 16 BROWN 202268 SDC1

2

3

4

5

6

7

40 50 60 70 80

log

FT

Age (year)

Infected Not infected Infected regression Not infected regression

2

3

4

5

6

40 50 60 70 80lo

g SH

BG

Age (year)

Infected Not infected Infected regression Not infected regression

A B

Figure – Supplemental Digital Content 1 - This figure demonstrates the log FT and SHBG by HIV status and age. FT was higher in HIV-uninfected individuals and decreased with age. The FT in an HIV-infected man was equivalent to the FT in an HIV-uninfected man 13 years older (β HIV-infected v. uninfected status: -0.13 (p < 0.001); β age: -0.01 (p < 0.0001)). SHBG was lower in HIV-uninfected individuals and increased with age. The SHBG in an HIV-infected man was equivalent to the SHBG in an HIV-uninfected man 20 years older (β HIV-infected v. uninfected status: 0.20 (p < 0.0001); β age: 0.01 (p < 0.0001)).