2010 IBC - Managing risks of control room operations
-
Upload
andy-brazier -
Category
Engineering
-
view
386 -
download
0
Transcript of 2010 IBC - Managing risks of control room operations
Tel: 01492 879813 Mob: 07984 [email protected]
Managing the risks of control room operations
Andy Brazier
What is a control room?
What is a control room?
Definition
A place where a facility or service can be monitored and controlled
The hub or command centre for decisionsCentral location where humans or computers receive data from field sensors.Commands may be transmitted back to remotely controlled equipment or field personnel
People that do the monitoring and control - not the control room.
The Brain of a system
Soft, shiny, grey-white
Multiple parts
Located in head
Value only make sense in terms of function
Brain relies on human senses
Control rooms deny operators the use of their sensesHow does this affect their capability?
System visibility
Limited possibilities for many systemsCCTV can provide some compensationEssential or nice to have?
Connection with the real world
Only outside view – Middle of desert in Oman!
Operators using their hearing
Pouring molten iron – crane driver could not hear the pops and bangs that warn of a problemGas plant operators not recognising the noise – stunt plane practicing nearby.
What do Control Room Operators do?
Control – monitor – operateNormal Situations
Communication - face to face including handoversOther communication - radio/telephoneAdministrative tasksEat mealsIssue permits-to-workTraining - themselves and others.
What do Control Room Operators do?
Emergency situationsRaise the alarmNotify emergency servicesCo-ordinate communicationKeep the logAccounting for personnelMonitor process for escalation.
Other control room users
Field operators - Supervisors Maintenance staff - Emergency responseBenefits of them using the control room
Improved communicationInvolving the control room operator – teamworkAccess to all information
Potential negativesDistractionConfusion – who is in charge?
Getting the balance right
Keeping people out
Locating them in the control room
Changes in the Control Room
New technologyMore automationLess peopleMore remoteA different job
More passiveMore lonelyMore responsibility.
The impact of modern control rooms
BenefitsRelieve people of boring, unpleasant and potentially hazardous tasksMore consistent and reliable operation
Negative outcomesOperators overloaded with alarms and dataNon-intuitive interfaces – people have to work harderA smaller ‘window’ on the systemOver reliance on technologyManagers becoming more distant from the operators.
Problems with alarms
Typical70% - Low priority90% - High priority
80% - Medium?
Operator perspective70% - High priority90% - Low priority92% - Very high
Overflow at 100%Trip at 90%10% in 15 minutes
More alarms must be better philosophy
1992 Vax system operating 6 machines – much better alarms than 2004 Windows XP system operating 3 machines
Past – every alarm had a cost Now – just a line of code
Engineers’ graphics
Using Piping and Instrumentation Drawings to design graphics – they are not drawn with that use in mind
Multiple options for emergency shutdown
Operators don’t want to have make have choices in an emergency
Other technology
Cordless phones – what happens in a power failure?
Remote access – why visit the control room? Manager can monitor on holiday
Approaches to control room design
Two contrasting views that result in poor designAll control rooms look the same – little to be considered in designControl rooms required specialist designers – leave them to get on with it with minimal input from others
Uncontrolled modificationsDifferent approaches used
Re-instrumentation – run by instrument engineersProcess improvement – run by operationsOrganisational – run by business managers
Balanced approach to end user involvement
Important (essential) – but requires some careChoice of furniture – how it looksLarger large display – without identifying a needControl graphics – same as existing
Manage expectationsResistance to change is inevitable‘User centred not ‘user led.’
Plausible on paper
Console desk only 500mm wide – typical 1000mm
New into old
Leg space!
25Lone operator
Human capabilities
AbilitiesLimitationsStill on Version 1
Hazards for control room staff
Normal workplace (similar to an office)Slips, trips and fallsElectricityFire
Nature of the jobLack of physical activityMental exertion
External eventsFire, explosions, toxic releaseTerrorism.
Hazards to others
Operating errors – doing things wrongFailure to detect, diagnose and respond to abnormal eventsConsequences can be devastatingNot addressed by ‘normal’ risk assessments or evaluations focussed purely on control room arrangements.
Nature of the Control Room Job
Features that make a job satisfying
The Modern CRO
Skill variety Lots of monitoring, not much action
Task significance Lots of automation - CRO responds when things go wrong
Task identity CRO responsible for large number of plants/systems
Autonomy Minimal - working to very tight specifications
Task feedback Aim is to avoid upsets and incidents
Common themesToo many distractions in control rooms
Nuisance alarmsVisitors, contractors, day staff
Fatigue because it is difficult for control room operators to get quality breaksLess face-to-face communication within teams
Unreliable radios
Procedures unsuitable for new ways of workingOver reliance on informal trainingInadequate refresher trainingReducing levels of supervision.
Conclusions
A control room is only a component in a systemA tool for people to operate the system
A new/upgraded control room is a major changeUsually multiple driversCan fundamentally change the way people work
End user involvement is essential, but only as part of a ‘user centred’ approachDo not assume that using the latest technology and applying the latest standards will guarantee a successful control room