2010 bioceramics
1
he technique of mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) is well understood to be of value in the field of bioceramics and rigid high-density polyethylene porous surgical implants. One might be hesitant to use the same pressure-based technique on soft, deformable polymers e.g. polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), chitosan, polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA) and their co-polymers (PLGA). However, since the pore sizes involved are typically quite large (usually above 100 microns 1 ), the pressures involved are rather small (less than 10 psi). Furthermore, the pressure is applied "isometrically", not transversely as in bubble-point (permeametry) techniques, so the polymer will not rupture even if in sheet form. MIP is therefore a viable technique. T h i n S h e e t s o r R e g u l a r S h a p e s Nevertheless, if detailed pore size measurements are not required, but just a measurement of overall porosity, the analysis is remarkably straightforward. Pore volume need not be measured directly (by pore filling with mercury 2 ) but can be calculated as the difference between bulk volume and "skeletal" volume. Bulk volume can be determined from consideration of geometric dimensions. Many biopolymers are formed as thin sheets or regular shapes. It is a therefore a trivial matter to take micrometer or caliper readings. Alternatively, and certainly for irregularly shaped pieces, bulk volume can be determined by Dry Powder Pycnometry. This technique entails measuring the increase in volume of a packed bed of powder when the sample is immersed in it, Archimedes style. One simply needs a powder, reasonably free flowing, whose particle size precludes it penetrating those pores connecting to the polymer surface. L i m i t e d O n l y B y O n e s I m a g i n a t i o n Over the years a number of different materials have been employed: graphite [1], aluminum hydroxide [2], metal powders [2,3], rapeseed [4], glass beads [5,6]. The list of possible materials is only limited by one's imagination. To complete the testing a reproducible means of packing the powder, by tapping, is employed. The Autotap (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL) is such a device. The powder and sample volumes are simply read from the graduations on the sample container. Both rapid and inexpensive, the Autotap (or its two-station sibling the Dual Autotap) is a valuable addition to any material development lab. A G o o d F i t The second half of indirect pore volume determination is the measurement of Skeletal Volume (true volume of polymer excluding pores---not the patient!). Nowadays this is normally achieved using a gas expansion pycnometer (dry, non destructive) rather than liquid displacement (solubility problems, solvent disposal etc). The one-sample Ultrapycnometer 1000 and the unique five-station Pentapycnometer (both Quantachrome Instruments) feature simple programming of automatic repeat measurements, balance and PC interfaces, and automatic printed report generation. The Ultrapycnometer is available in a special version, the UltraFoam Pycnometer, which additionally calculates open porosity and closed pore volume (as percentages). Already used for a number of years in non-surgical fields (packaging, insulation, wicking etc), the technology is well established and seems like a good fit to the objectives of the bio-materials community. R e f e r e n c e s 1. S. Davis, A. Dolle and E. Moreau (1988) Prog. Batt. Sol. Cells, 7, 342-348 2. B. Buczek and D. Geldart (1986) Powder Technol , 45, 173-176 3. A. Korta and J. Klinik (1975) Chem. Anal. 20, 1079 4. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10-05 Guidelines for Measurement of Volume by Rapeseed Displacement. 5. M. P. Hwang, and K.-I. Hayakawa, (1980) J. Food Sci, 45, 1400-1402. 6. S. L. Wilkison and M. S. Robinson. (2000) Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 35, 1203-1213. F o o t n o t e s 1. Wound dressings have considerably smaller pores. 2. ...although mercury is an excellent contrast medium to assist in visualizing pore shape and connectivity by X-ray tomography and/or confocal light microscopy. * featured in article “Options: MEDPOR ® Biomaterial and Surgical Implants” (www.porexsurgical.com) For more information contact Quantachrome Instruments by phone: (561) 731.4999, fax: (561) 732.9888, email: [email protected] or visit www.quantachrome.com. The Role of Porosity A look at the application of porosimetry in reconstructive surgery and wound care biopolymers. Heathcare T r e n d s M a r t i n A . T h o m a s P h . D . , Director of Business Development Quantachrome Instruments ([email protected]) T Craniofacial reconstruction is a typical application for porous biopolymers. C A L C U L A T I O N S 1. Porosity = Pore Volume Bulk Volume x 100% 3. Porosity = Bulk Volume - Skeletal Volume Bulk Volume x100% 2. Porosity = Bulk Volume - Skeletal Volume 4. Porosity = x100% Skeletal Volume Bulk Volume 1- ( ) 5. Porosity = x100% Bulk Density Skeletal Density 1- ( ) and since then therefore or How You Measure Porosity Depends On Which Direction You’re Coming From. F o r m o r e i n f o r m a t i o n , c a l l u s a t 5 6 1 . 7 3 1 . 4 9 9 9 o r e m a i l u s a t w w w . q u a n t a c h r o m e . c o m [email protected] V b u l k A U T H O R ’ S N O T E : D E L V I N G F U R T H E R I N T O V - B U L K The diagram shows the principle of simple Archimedes-style displacement in order to determine the bulk volume of a three-dimensional object. When using dry powder, the trick is to cause reproducible packing behavior of the powder around the sample. It is for this reason that the powder bed should be tapped until it reaches its maximum packing density (at the so-called “jamming transition”). External force supplied by a ram, or tamping, should be avoided so as not to compress a porous polymer. Displacement of liquid mercury can also be employed. Non-wetting mercury will not enter a pore unless an external pressure is applied. In this case the determination is usually performed gravimetrically, using a mercury intrusion porosimeter to fill the sample holder (pycnometer) with mercury. The Gay-Lussac density-bottle principle is then used to calculate the sample volume from a series of weighings. If you already know the true skeletal density of your polymer (for example if you are using sintered polyetheylene) or the specific pore volume (from liquid uptake), then all you need is bulk volume. The A u t o t a p T M series inexpensively allows you to determine bulk volume of irregularly shaped biomaterials using any reasonably free-flowing granular or powdered medium. If all you have is the bulk volume (say of a sheet, or other regular geometric shape), then you need to know either pore volume directly (by some liquid filling method), or calculate it from bulk volume and skeletal volume. The U l t r a f o a m T M gas pycnometer quickly and accurately reports open and closed percent porosity, non-destructively using dry gas. Part# 07152 Rev A © 2004-2010 Quantachrome Corporation
Transcript of 2010 bioceramics
he technique of mercury intrusion porosimetry(MIP) is well understood to be of value in thefield of bioceramics and rigid high-densitypolyethylene porous surgical implants. One might be
hesitant to use the same pressure-based technique on soft,deformable polymers e.g. polyhydroxyalkanoates(PHAs), chitosan, polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolicacid (PGA) and their co-polymers (PLGA). However, sincethe pore sizes involved are typically quite large (usuallyabove 100 microns1), the pressures involved are rathersmall (less than 10 psi). Furthermore, the pressure isapplied "isometrically", not transversely as in bubble-point(permeametry) techniques, so the polymer will not ruptureeven if in sheet form. MIP is therefore a viable technique.
Thin Sheets or Regular ShapesNevertheless, if detailed pore size measurements are notrequired, but just a measurement of overall porosity, theanalysis is remarkably straightforward. Pore volumeneed not be measured directly (by pore filling withmercury2) but can be calculated as the difference betweenbulk volume and "skeletal" volume. Bulk volume can bedetermined from consideration of geometric dimensions.Many biopolymers are formed as thin sheets or regularshapes. It is a therefore a trivial matter to takemicrometer or caliper readings. Alternatively, andcertainly for irregularly shaped pieces, bulk volume canbe determined by Dry Powder Pycnometry. Thistechnique entails measuring the increase in volume of apacked bed of powder when the sample is immersed in it,Archimedes style. One simply needs a powder,reasonably free flowing, whose particle size precludes itpenetrating those pores connecting to the polymer surface.
Limited Only By Ones Imaginat ionOver the years a number of different materials have beenemployed: graphite [1], aluminum hydroxide [2], metalpowders [2,3], rapeseed [4], glass beads [5,6]. The list ofpossible materials is only limited by one's imagination.To complete the testing a reproducible means of packingthe powder, by tapping, is employed. The Autotap(Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL) is sucha device. The powder and sample volumes are simplyread from the graduations on the sample container. Bothrapid and inexpensive, the Autotap (or its two-stationsibling the Dual Autotap) is a valuable addition to anymaterial development lab.
A Good FitThe second half of indirect pore volume determination isthe measurement of Skeletal Volume (true volume ofpolymer excluding pores---not the patient!). Nowadaysthis is normally achieved using a gas expansionpycnometer (dry, non destructive) rather than liquid
displacement (solubility problems, solvent disposal etc).The one-sample Ultrapycnometer 1000 and the uniquefive-station Pentapycnometer (both QuantachromeInstruments) feature simple programming of automaticrepeat measurements, balance and PC interfaces, and automaticprinted report generation. The Ultrapycnometer is availablein a special version, the UltraFoam Pycnometer, whichadditionally calculates open porosity and closed porevolume (as percentages). Already used for a number ofyears in non-surgical fields (packaging, insulation, wickingetc), the technology is well established and seems like agood fit to the objectives of the bio-materials community.
References1. S. Davis, A. Dolle and E. Moreau (1988) Prog. Batt.
Sol. Cells, 7, 342-348 2. B. Buczek and D. Geldart (1986) Powder Technol,45, 173-1763. A. Korta and J. Klinik (1975) Chem. Anal. 20, 10794. Approved Methods of the American Association of
Cereal Chemists, 10-05 Guidelines for Measurement of Volume by Rapeseed Displacement.
5. M. P. Hwang, and K.-I. Hayakawa, (1980) J. Food Sci, 45, 1400-1402.
6. S. L. Wilkison and M. S. Robinson. (2000) Meteorit.Planet. Sci., 35, 1203-1213.
Footnotes1. Wound dressings have considerably smaller pores.2. ...although mercury is an excellent contrast medium to
assist in visualizing pore shape and connectivity by X-ray tomography and/or confocal light microscopy.
* featured in article “Options: MEDPOR® Biomaterialand Surgical Implants” (www.porexsurgical.com)
For more information contact Quantachrome Instrumentsby phone: (561) 731.4999, fax: (561) 732.9888, email:[email protected] or visitwww.quantachrome.com.
The Role of PorosityA look at the application of porosimetry in reconstructive surgery and wound care biopolymers.
H e a t h c a r e T r e n d s
Mart in A. Thomas Ph.D. , Direc tor of Bus iness D evelopment Quantachrome Instruments (mar t in . [email protected])
T
Craniofac ia l reconstruct ion is a typica l appl icat ion forporous biopolymers .
C A L C U L A T I O N S
1. Porosity =Pore VolumeBulk Volume
x 100%
3. Porosity =Bulk Volume - Skeletal Volume
Bulk Volumex100%
2. Porosity = Bulk Volume - Skeletal Volume
4. Porosity = x100%Skeletal VolumeBulk Volume
1-( )
5. Porosity = x100%Bulk DensitySkeletal Density
1-( )
and since
then
therefore
or
How You Measure Porosity Depends On Which Direction You’re Coming From.
For more information, call us at561.731.4999 or email us at
V b u l k
A U T H O R ’ S N O T E : D E L V I N G F U R T H E R I N T O V - B U L K
The diagram shows the principle of simpleArchimedes-style displacement in order to determinethe bulk volume of a three-dimensional object. Whenusing dry powder, the trick is to cause reproduciblepacking behavior of the powder around the sample. Itis for this reason that the powder bed should be tappeduntil it reaches its maximum packing density (at theso-called “jamming transition”). External force suppliedby a ram, or tamping, should be avoided so as not tocompress a porous polymer.
Displacement of liquid mercury can also beemployed. Non-wetting mercury will not enter a poreunless an external pressure is applied. In this casethe determination is usually performed gravimetrically,using a mercury intrusion porosimeter to fill the sampleholder (pycnometer) with mercury. The Gay-Lussacdensity-bottle principle is then used to calculate thesample volume from a series of weighings.
If you already know the true skeletal density of your polymer(for example if you are using sintered polyetheylene) or thespecific pore volume (from liquid uptake), then all you needis bulk volume.The AutotapTM series inexpensively allowsyou to determine bulk volume of irregularly shapedbiomaterials using any reasonably free-flowing granular or powdered medium.
If all you have is the bulk volume (say of a sheet, orother regular geometric shape), then you need toknow either pore volume directly (by some liquidfilling method),or calculate it from bulk volume andskeletal volume. The UltrafoamTM gas pycnometerquickly and accurately reports open and closedpercent porosity, non-destructively using dry gas.
Part# 07152 Rev A © 2004-2010 Quantachrome Corporation
