2010 Bicycle Rack Utilization Report FINAL

8/8/2019 2010 Bicycle Rack Utilization Report FINAL

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-bicycle-rack-utilization-report-final 1/28



TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2010 BICYCLE PARKING INVENTORY & UTILIZATION SURVEY .......................................... 1

METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................ 1

FINDINGS ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

ALL BICYCLE PARKING ................................................................................................................................................ 2

ADEQUACY OF BICYCLE RACKS ..................................................................................................................................... 4

BICYCLE LOCKERS ...................................................................................................................................................... 5

ABANDONED BICYCLES ............................................................................................................................................... 6

CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS .......................................................................................................................... 6

APPENDIX A | SURVEY MATERIALS ................................................................................................................ 8

SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 8

RACK

TYPES

...........................................................................................................................................................

10

NEW RACKS FORM .................................................................................................................................................. 12

MISSING RACKS FORM ............................................................................................................................................. 13

INCORRECT RACKS FORM .......................................................................................................................................... 14

NON‐RACK PARKED BICYCLES FORM ............................................................................................................................ 15

CAMPUS SURVEY GRID MAP ...................................................................................................................................... 16

APPENDIX B | TRENDS IN BICYCLE PARKING AND RACK UTILIZATION BY AREA (1997 – 2010) ....................... 17

APPENDIX C | HIGH UTILIZATION LOCATIONS .............................................................................................. 19

APPENDIX D | LOW UTILIZATION LOCATIONS .............................................................................................. 20

APPENDIX E | BIKE RACK UTILIZATION BY AREA ........................................................................................... 21



University of Washington Commuter Services

INTRODUCTION

Each year since 1995, the University of Washington’s Commuter Services has conducted its Annual

Bicycle Parking Inventory and Utilization Survey to assess the adequacy of the University’s bicycle

parking facilities and identify trends in bicycle parking demand. The Survey has two main

components,

counting

the

number

of

bicycles

parked

on

campus

and

recording

any

previously

undocumented changes to the University’s bicycle parking asset inventory. Knowing how and where

UW community members use end‐of ‐trip facilities like bike racks, lockers, enclosures1 and rooms

allows Commuter Services to adjust capacity and provide additional end‐of ‐trip services as

appropriate. Finally, because changes in demand for bicycle parking may be linked to changes in

bicycle ridership, the Annual Survey also provides Commuter Services with a complementary tool for

assessing and corroborating trends in ridership on and to campus.2

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2010 BICYCLE PARKING INVENTORY & UTILIZATION SURVEY

The 2,745 bicycles counted in the 2010 Survey were the most in its fifteen year history. They

represent a 12.8 percent increase from the 2,434 bicycles counted in 2009 and a 3.4 percent

increase over the previous record (2,655), set in 2008.

Since the Survey’s inception in 1995, the number of bicycles counted has grown 24.9 percent.

2010’s overall bicycle rack utilization (number of bicycles / bicycle parking capacity) of 55.7

percent is the highest in the Survey’s history. The 53.2 percent adjusted rack utilization,3 which

accounts for changes in assumed rack capacity between 2009 and 2010, is still the highest rack

utilization in the Survey’s history, 10.9 percentage points greater than in 2009 (42.3 percent

utilization) and 11.9 percentage points greater than in 2008 (41.3 percent utilization).

Compared to 2009, bicycle rack utilization increased by 13.5 percentage points overall, growing

in all areas of campus (ranging between 10.6 and 20.0 percentage points) except for West

Campus (‐7.9 percentage points). 2010’s adjusted rack utilization increased in all areas of

campus (ranging between 7.4 and 20.0 percentage points) except for West Campus (‐10.0

percentage points).

Central Campus experienced the largest single‐year increase in number of bicycles counted,

growing from 681 bicycles in 2009 to 966 in 2010 (increase of 285). West and South Campus

were the only areas of campus that experienced single‐year declines in number of bicycles

counted (‐41 and ‐29, respectively).

METHODOLOGY

Commuter

Services

conducted

the

2010

Bicycle

Parking

Inventory

and

Utilization

Survey

on

Wednesday, May 19th, between 11 AM and 2 PM. This is consistent with past surveys, which have

1 Secure enclosures refers to fenced areas, either in parking garages or open‐air.

2 The primary tool used to assess ridership and mode split trends is the Biennial U‐PASS Survey Report , available

at http://uwcommute.com/files/reports. 3 Adjusted rack utilization was calculated by using the 2009 rack capacity instead of the 2010 rack capacity in

situations where the two differed.

1

http://uwcommute.com/files/reports

http://uwcommute.com/files/reports




The 2,745 bicycles counted in 2010 are the most in the Survey’s history, and the 55.7 percent rack

utilization is also a University record. Rack utilization increased moderately between 2008 and 2009,

and significantly between 2009 and 2010. The first increase was due primarily to adjustments in the

capacity of “ribbon” racks (see Appendix A, Rack Types, for depictions of rack types). Prior to 2009,

the manufacturer’s rated capacity was used in determining rack utilization; however, in 2009

Commuter

Services

began

using

the actual

capacity

of

ribbon

racks,

as

observed

at

UW

and

elsewhere, in calculating utilization. Actual capacity is a more accurate metric than rated capacity, as

the latter can have the effect of drastically underestimating utilization.5 The increase in utilization

observed in 2010 reflects an overall increase in the number of bicycles counted, as well as further

refinements in calculating capacity for ribbon, toast, and other racks.6 Table 1 shows how utilization

and number of bicycles counted have increased compared to both 2009 and a 2000 baseline.

CAMPUS

AREA

2010 BICYCLES

COUNTED

% CHANGE

SINCE 2009

% CHANGE

SINCE 2000

2010 RACK

UTILIZATION

% POINT

CHANGE

SINCE 2009

% POINT

CHANGE

SINCE 2000

West 477 ‐7.9% 3.2% 58.0% ‐7.9 13.7

East

133

13.7% 87.3% 32.9% 10.6

10.1North 745 12.0% 54.6% 64.5% 13.5 30.2

South 424 ‐6.4% 22.5% 53.3% 15.9 21.0

Central 966 41.9% 44.4% 55.2% 20.0 26.8

Campus Total 2,745 12.8% 35.2% 55.7% 13.5 22.9

Table 1: Comparison of number of bicycles and utilization over time (2010, 2009, 2000)

In recent years, providing secure and covered parking facilities has become a greater priority for

Commuter Services. Parking options such as bike lockers, rooms, and enclosures provide users with

an added level of security and can alleviate the risk and perception of risk of bike theft. Covered bike

parking facilities offer protection from rain, which occurs frequently in the Pacific Northwest. Table 2

shows

the

distribution

of

covered,

secure,

and

high

security

campus

bike

parking

facilities.

7

SECURE CAPACITY HIGH SECURITY CAPACITY

AREA COVERED8 UNCOVERED TOTAL ROOMS ENCLOSURES LOCKERS TOTAL GRAND TOTAL

West 399 350 749 65 9 64 138 887

East 241 163 404 0 0 22 22 426

North 514 485 999 128 28 62 218 1,217

South 317 419 736 0 59 316 375 1,111

Central 611 1096 1707 42 0 149 191 1,898

Total 2,082 2,513 4,595 235 96 613 944 5,539

Table 2: Bike parking capacity by security and coverage

5 In most cases a ribbon rack’s actual capacity is 50‐60 percent its rated capacity.

6 In 2010, Commuter Services made a concerted effort to adjust a rack’s actual capacity based on installation

orientation and rack obstructions. This is particularly significant for toast racks – the most common rack type

on campus – which are designed to be accessed from two sides. In the absence of two‐sided access, a toast

rack’s actual rack capacity can be reduced by 50 percent or more. Similarly, other rack types installed too close

to a wall or other obstruction can have their effective rack capacity significantly reduced. 7 Secure capacity includes racks not in locked facilities. High security includes rooms, lockers, and enclosures

8 This number does not include high security capacity, and all high security capacity is covered.

3




Adequacy of bicycle racks

As part of encouraging and facilitating bicycle use by students, faculty, staff, and visitors, the

University of Washington has an interest in optimizing the placement of bicycle racks around

campus. To that end, one of the objectives of monitoring the use of bicycle parking facilities on

campus

is

to

identify

locations

where

the

existing

facilities

are

not

well‐matched

to

demand.

Commuter Services can then focus on high‐demand locations that may be able to accommodate

additional bicycle parking, as well as low‐demand locations that may be able to “donate” bike parking

to locations in greater need.9 Commuter Services uses three primary methods to identify locations in

need of additional bicycle racks and locations with a surplus of bicycle racks:

1) Evaluation of specific locations with > 80 percent utilization (“High” utilization)

2) Evaluation of specific locations with < 5 percent utilization (“Low” utilization)

3) Feedback from campus bicyclists and building coordinators

Appendices C and D list the locations with high and low utilization in 2010, respectively, and Figure 2

shows the

number

of

high

and

low

utilization

sites

over

time.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

N u m b e r o f l o c a t i o n s

HIGH UTILIZATION LOW UTILIZATION

Figure 2: High and low utilization locations over time

Regarding campus bike rack utilization in general, the following points are of particular interest:

• Sixty‐seven locations across campus had > 80 percent utilization.

• Campus‐wide, covered rack utilization averaged 62 percent, compared to just 49 percent for

uncovered.

• Covered racks represented 63 percent (42 locations) of high utilization locations despite

comprising just 47 percent of total rack locations and 49 percent of total rack capacity.

9 Many of the racks on campus are mobile, and can be redistributed to better match demand. Care is always

taken to maintain a minimum level of capacity at all areas, including those with low utilization.

4




• Uncovered racks represented 64 percent (25 locations) of rack locations with low utilization,

despite representing 53 percent of all rack locations and 51 percent of total rack capacity.

Conversely, covered racks represented just 36 percent (14 locations) of low utilization

locations, in spite of representing 47 percent of all rack locations.

• Forty locations across campus had < 5 percent utilization.

Between summer 2009 and summer 2010, the University added bicycle parking capacity at the

following locations through a combination of new capacity, capacity re‐balancing, and building

acquisitions, as shown in Table 3:

LOCATION RACK TYPE COVERED CAPACITY TYPE

ARCHITECTURE (SOUTHWEST) TOAST YES 38 NEW

ARCHITECTURE (SOUTHWEST) LOCKERS YES 32 NEW

BAGLEY (NORTHWEST) TOAST NO 20 RE‐BALANCE

BURKE MUSEUM (SOUTHEAST) COAT‐HANGER NO 7 RE‐BALANCE

CLARK HALL (NORTHEAST) RIBBON NO 7 NEW

FOEGE BIOENGINEERING (EAST) TOAST NO 13 RE‐BALANCE

KANE HALL

(NORTH)

TOAST NO 13

RE

‐BALANCE

MUSIC BUILDING (WEST) TOAST NO 11 RE‐BALANCE

OCEAN SCIENCES (SOUTHWEST) TOAST NO 7 RE‐BALANCE

PURCHASING & ACCOUNTING BUILDING (WEST) VERTICAL YES 4 NEW

ROOSEVELT COMMONS (PARKING GARAGE) HANGER YES 4 ACQUISITION

ROOSEVELT COMMONS (PARKING GARAGE) RIBBON YES 8 ACQUISITION

S1 SECURE PARKING AREA (LOWER LEVEL) VERTICAL YES 38 NEW

SAVERY HALL (WEST) TOAST YES 28 NEW

Table 3: Capacity changes, summer 2009 ‐ summer 2010

Bicycle lockers

At the

time

of

the

Survey,

there

were

307

bicycle

lockers

on

campus

with

a maximum

capacity

of

614

bicycles. Eighty‐four locker spaces were vacant and an additional 173 spaces were available due to a

combination of transitions between rentals and the implementation of a quality control process10, 10

were damaged, and 347 were rented out, for an occupancy rate of 56.5 percent.

On June 3rd, 2010, Commuter Services sent a supplementary online survey to current locker tenants.

An estimated 59.1 percent utilization rate was deduced based on responses to the question, “Last

week, how many days did you ride your bike to campus and park in your bike locker?”11 By

10 In 2009, Commuter Services migrated its bicycle locker permitting database to a new database platform. In

the process a number of lockers that should have been “Available” because their tenants had cancelled their

leases instead

defaulted

to

“Hold”

status.

Prior

to

the

2010

Survey,

Commuter

Services

began

implementing

a

strategy to confirm locker statuses. The issue is anticipated to be resolved by end of fall quarter. 11

Interestingly, survey respondents indicated a significantly higher locker utilization rate at all other times of

the year. Based on similarly worded questions, utilization rates from fall, winter, spring, and summer quarters

were derived at 72 percent, 63 percent, 75 percent, and 78 percent, respectively. This may be the result of

survey response bias, wherein respondents overestimate their “good behavior.” It may also indicate that

respondents can more accurately predict their locker utilization rates for a single previous week than for an

entire quarter. Conversely, it may be that something about the week of May 24th

, 2010 caused many

respondents who ordinarily bike to campus and park in their lockers to choose not to.

5




multiplying this percentage rate by the total number of leased bicycle lockers, it was determined that

205 bicycles occupied lockers on May 19th, 2010.

Abandoned bicycles

In years past, Commuter Services has tagged presumed‐to‐be‐abandoned bicycles during the Bicycle

Parking Inventory and Utilization Survey. This year, UW Moving & Surplus was responsible for

tagging presumed‐to‐be abandoned bicycles and accessories and collaborating with the UW Police

Department on impounds for abandoned property. Approximately 200 bicycles were tagged

throughout the months of June and July, with impounds occurring in September. Seventy bicycles

were impounded by UW Police Department. As per Washington Administrative Code, after 60 days

have passed from the time any bicycle or any part of a bicycle has been impounded, items that have

not been claimed by their rightful owner can be sold by UW Moving & Surplus. In years past, sales of

impounded bicycles have coincided with UW’s annual Ride in the Rain event; however, in 2010,

impounded abandoned bicycles will be retained and sold in early April, 2011, to coincide with Bike to

Campus

Month.

CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS

The University of Washington continues to promote bicycling to faculty, staff, students, and visitors

by providing end‐of ‐trip facilities including bicycle racks, rooms, enclosures, and lockers. The data

collected in the 2010 Bicycle Parking Inventory and Utilization Survey overwhelmingly demonstrate

that demand for these types of facilities is on the rise. The number of bicycles counted in 2010 was

the most in the Survey’s history and resulted in a record high campus‐wide rack utilization.

Despite these positive trends, Commuter Services still sees room for improvement in its bicycle

parking program.

Managing

the

University’s

enormous

bicycle

locker

inventory

continues

to

be

a

challenge, particularly as campus construction projects necessitate locker and tenant relocations.

Improving the efficiency and quality control of the bicycle locker program will be an emphasis in the

coming year, with the goal being to maximize locker occupancy and utilization in fall 2010 and

sustain those levels throughout subsequent quarters.

Another area for growth will be Commuter Services’ bicycle parking asset management system. In

2010, Commuter Services began migrating its CAD‐ and Excel‐based inventory to a Geographic

Information Systems (GIS) platform. Students in the University’s academic GIS program completed a

GPS rack and locker inventory in spring quarter; that dataset will be compared to and reconciled with

existing inventories and data from the 2010 Bicycle Parking Inventory in order to produce a high‐

quality GIS inventory. Storing bicycle parking assets in a GIS platform will enable Commuter Services

to better manage its inventory and assess demand for bicycle parking in a proactive manner.

Finally, Commuter Services is working to develop a strategic process for installing bicycle parking.

This process will consist of a needs assessment; updating design/parking standards and guidelines;

developing short‐, mid‐, and long‐term implementation strategies; and, a bicycle parking program

6




evaluation. Adopting this type of process will allow Commuter Services to better prioritize projects

and more proactively address the increasing demand for bicycle parking.

7




8

APPENDIX A | SURVEY MATERIALS

Survey instructions

General Instructions

Please count all bikes parked on your portion of the campus map, except on racks labeled “do not

count.” Mark the number of bikes parked at a rack or group of racks by writing the number of bikes

next to the Rack ID Number. Correct mistakes on the map if there are errors, which may include

making changes to the presence and capacity of racks (see “Detailed Instructions,” below). When

counting bikes, count by map label. For example, if the label says 9/RB‐13/A/NC, count all of the

bikes at all 9 racks and report that number. Do not count each rack separately unless it is labeled on

the map as an individual rack. Please use blue ink.

KEY TO MAP LABELS:

2/RB‐11/A/NC = 2 Ribbon Racks, 11 capacity each, asphalt, not covered.

2104 = Rack ID Number (first two digits correspond to page number).

1. The first

number

indicates

the

number

of

racks

at

this

location.

2. The second set of information indicates the type of racks and capacity:

RB‐9 = Ribbon 9 capacity



TST = Toast Rack

R3 = Rack Three (brown rack, 2 capacity)

DS‐AA, DS‐BB, DS‐EE, = Double

sided rack (see pictures for

style)

SS‐8 = Single sided 8 capacity

(other capacities possible,

denoted by appropriate

number, sometimes no

number)

Custom = Custom Rack

BKLID = Bikelid, only one on

campus

3. The third code indicates the type of surface:

A

=

Asphalt

B = Brick

C = Concrete

D

=

Dirt

G = Gravel

4. The fourth code indicates if the area is covered:

NC = Not Covered (blue)

C = Covered (red)

Detailed Instructions

You may encounter racks that differ in type, presence, and/or capacity from what is indicated

on the map.

• If you find a rack in your area that is not on the map, place a letter on the map and

write the same letter in the “Letter on Map” column on the form titled, “New Racks”.

Fill out

the

remaining

information

on

the

form.

• If there is a rack (or group of racks) on your map that is not on the ground, cross out

the rack(s) on the map with a single line through the label and write the Rack ID

Number in the “Rack ID Number” column on the form titled, “Missing Racks.” Fill out

the remaining information on the form.

• If the map contains incorrect information about the number of racks, rack capacity,

etc., cross out the incorrect information on the map and write the correct




Rack types

10




11




New racks form

Letter on Map

Map Page Number

Number of Racks Rack

TypeCapacity

Number of Bikes Surface Covered

(Y/N)

New Racks

New Racks

12




Missing racks form

Rack ID Number

Map Page Number

Rack ID Number

Map Page Number

Rack ID Number

Map Page Number

Missing Racks

Missing Racks

13




Incorrect racks form

Rack ID

Number

Rack ID

Number

Rack ID

Number

Rack ID

Number

Incorrect Racks

Incorrect Racks

14




Non‐rack parked bicycles form

*Railings at Haggett and McMahon are considered racks

Letter + Number

on Map (ex: A1)

Map Page

Number

Number

of BikesWhat is the Bike(s) Locked To?

*Railings at Haggett and McMahon are considered racks

Bikes Parked at Non‐Rack Locations*

Bikes Parked at Non‐Rack Locations*

15




Campus survey grid map

16




APPENDIX B | TRENDS IN BICYCLE PARKING AND RACK UTILIZATION BY AREA (1997 – 2010)12

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

200

400

600

8001000

1200

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

P e r c e n t u t i l i z a t i o n

N u m b e r o f b i c y c l e s a n d s t

a l l s

West Campus

BICYCLES COUNTED BICYCLE PARKING CAPACITY PERCENT UTILIZATION

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010


N u

m b e r o f b i c y c l e s a n d s t a l l s

East Campus

BICYCLES COUNTED BICYCLE

PARKING

CAPACITY PERCENT

UTILIZATION

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

300

600

900

1200

1500

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010


N u m b e r o

f b i c y c l e s a n d s t a l l s

North Campus


12 Does not include bicycle lockers

17




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

200

400

600800

1000

1200

1400

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010


N u m b e r o f b i c y c l e s

a n d s t a l l s

South Campus


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

2400

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010


N u m b e r o f b i c y c l e s a n d s t a l l s

Central Campus

BICYCLES COUNTED BICYCLE

PARKING

CAPACITY PERCENT

UTILIZATION

18




APPENDIX C | HIGH UTILIZATION LOCATIONS

HIGH UTILIZATION – COVERED RACKS

LOCATION UTILIZATION LOCATION UTILIZATION

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING – SOUTHEAST 182% HALL HEALTH 100%

MCCARTY BIKE RM ‐ 100X 160% BENJAMIN HALL ‐ SOUTH 100%

MEANY –

INSIDE

LOADING

DOCK

150% HENDERSON

‐SOUTHEAST

(APL)

100%

UW MED CENTER ‐ EAST EMG (SMALL) 143% ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING – SOUTHWEST 100%

STEVENS CT – NORTH 133% PLANT OPERATIONS ANNEXX 100%

WILLIAM H. GATES 131% K‐WING ‐ NORTH 100%

CERAMIC & METAL ARTS 127% FISHERIES CTR – NORTH

MCCARTY BIKE RM ‐ G017 125% TERRY LANDER – WEST

MERCER ‐ COVERED 125% KANE ENTRY – SOUTHEAST

TERRY LANDER ‐ EAST 123% OCEAN SCIENCES – NORTHWEST 92%

MCMAHON RAILINGS 120% K‐WING – SOUTH

HENDERSON ‐ WEST (APL) 120% BENJAMIN HALL ‐ BIKE RM 89%

BALMER 119% BAGLEY 89%

HAGGETT – WEST 116% PARRINGTON 88%

MCCARTY

BIKE

RM‐

300K

113% FLUKE

BIKE

SHELTER‐

NORTH

87%MCCARTY BIKE RM ‐ 300X 113% CHEMISTRY 86%

T‐WING ‐ WEST 113% UW TOWER GARAGE 86%

UW MED CENTER ‐ EAST EMG (LARGE) 112% ART ‐ NORTHWEST 83%

PADELFORD ENTRY 107% HAGGETT – SOUTHWEST

MCCARTY BIKE RM ‐ 500K 100% BLOEDEL – NORTHEAST

SOCIAL WORK ‐ WEST 100%

HIGH UTILIZATION – UNCOVERED RACKS


SNOHOMISH LN ‐ HEC ED OVERPASS 154% BLOEDEL/C10 PKG LOT – WEST 97%

BOTANY GREENHOUSE 144% PIERCE/SPOKANE LNS 95%

JOHNSON – SOUTH 140% BB WING – SOUTH

BENJAMIN HALL

–

NORTH

125% HUB

‐SOUTH

BUS

STOP 92%

I‐COURT 125% MORE ‐ CIVIL ENGINEERING 92%

MCCARTY – WEST 117% HUB – NORTH

MILLER – SOUTHEAST 112% BLOEDEL/C10 PKG LOT – WEST 89%

TERRY LANDER – EAST 111% ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES – SOUTH 88%

WINKENWERDER – NORTH 108% BB WING – NORTHEAST

BB WING – NORTHWEST 105% KINCAID – SOUTHWEST

MUSIC – NORTHWEST 100% GUGGENHEIM – WEST

AGUA VERDE 100% PLANT LAB ‐ HEALTH SKYWALK 83%

PHYSICS – NORTH 100%

19




APPENDIX D | LOW UTILIZATION LOCATIONS

LOW UTILIZATION – COVERED RACKS


FACULTY CENTER 0% PURCHASING & ACCOUNTING ‐ SOUTH 0%

PADELFORD ‐ N18 0% PURCHASING – WEST 0

HAGGETT –

SOUTH

0% IMA – NORTH 0%

ISAACSON HALL – NORTH 0% SOUTH CAMPUST‐NORTH ENTRY 0

BENJAMIN HALL ENCLOSURE – UPPER LEVEL 0% CLINIC – NORTH 0%

BRYANT BLDG/PARKING VIOLATIONS 0% DEMPSEY INDOOR – SOUTHWEST 0

WEST CAMPUS PARKING GARAGE – WEST 0% MCMAHON – LOWER 3

LOW UTILIZATION – UNCOVERED RACKS


PLAYHOUSE 0% COMMUNITY DESIGN CENTER 0

PLANT SERVICES 0% FOEGE‐GENOME SCIENCES 0%

ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY STORAGE BLDG 0% FOEGE‐BIOENGINEERING 0

GOLF DRIVING RANGE 0% CHEMISTRY BLDG 0%

ENVIRONMENTAL

SAFETY

STORAGE/E15

0% BASEBALL

GRANDSTAND

0DOUGLAS RESEARCH CONSERVATORY – WEST 0% HARRIS – NORTHEAST 0

NORTHLAKE – WEST 0% S‐1 TOP LEVEL 0%

STAFF SERVICES ENTRY 0% FISHERIES CTR – NORTH 0

PURCHASING/GRANTS – NORTH 0% FISHERIES CTR – NORTHEAST 0

SAKUMA PARK 0% WILSON ANNEX 0%

HENDERSON – NORTHEAST 0% HUSKY STADIUM 0%

20




APPENDIX E | BIKE RACK UTILIZATION BY AREA

21




22




23




24




25



University of Washington | Commuter Services

University Transportation

Center

| Box

355360

3745 15th Ave NE | Seattle Washington | 98105

For additional information, contact:

David Amiton | Transportation Analyst

(206) 616‐7493 | [email protected]

www.uwcommute.com

mailto:[email protected]


http://www.uwcommute.com/




2010 Bicycle Rack Utilization Report FINAL

Documents

Transcript of 2010 Bicycle Rack Utilization Report FINAL