2010 12 14 Byrd Decommissioning In The Usa

39
DECOMMISSIONING IN THE USA Presented to the Forum on Identifying the Synergies Between Identifying the Synergies Between Decommissioning and Wreck Removal December 2010 Presented by Robert C. Byrd, PhD, PE

description

A summary of offshore facility decommissioning issues in the USA. Presented to the Society for Underwater Technology, London, UK, December 2010, by Robert C. Byrd, Ph.D., P.E.

Transcript of 2010 12 14 Byrd Decommissioning In The Usa

Page 1: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

DECOMMISSIONING IN THE USAPresented to the

Forum on

Identifying the Synergies BetweenIdentifying the Synergies BetweenDecommissioning and Wreck Removal

December 2010Presented by

Robert C. Byrd, PhD, PE

Page 2: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Offshore Platform ComponentsOffshore Platform Components

Page 3: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

The Decommissioning Process

Page 4: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Deck Removal

Page 5: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 6: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

50 lb. Configured Bulk Chargeith Ei ht D t twith Eight Detonators

Page 7: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

BP P15 R1JN Platform Removal

Cold CuttingCold Cutting

• Water abrasive cutting w/ internal pile cutter

Page 8: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 9: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Partial RemovalCENTER BRACING CUT OUTLEAVEING A MIN. ONE FOOT

STUB FOR SLINGS

M.W.L.

CUT CUT

CUTCUT OFF @ -86 ELEV

JUST ABOVE DOUBLER

LEAVE 6 INCHES OFMETAL ON THE OUTEREDGE OF LEG A1 & B1

LEAVE 6 INCHES OFMETAL ON THE OUTEREDGE OF LEG A4 & B4

Page 10: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 11: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Active Platforms by Water Depth

34803500

2500

3000

Plat

form

s

1500

2000

of A

ctiv

e P

442500

1000

Num

ber o

47 4 25

0

500N

0 to 200 201 to 400 401 to 800 801 to 1000 Above 1000Water Depth (Meters)

Page 12: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Number of Gulf Of Mexico OCS Platform Installed vs Removed (1942-2008)

225

250

150

175

200

f Pla

tfor

ms

100

125

150

Num

ber o

f

25

50

75

0

25

1940 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Year

Installed Removed

Page 13: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Number of Gulf Of Mexico OCS Platform Installed vs Removed (2000-2008)

200

225

150

175

f Pla

tfor

ms

75

100

125

Num

ber o

f

25

50

75

02000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Year

Installed Removed

Page 14: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

US Gulf of Mexico Inventory Summary

2009 5‐YR AVERAGE

(2003 2008)

CUMULATIVE(1947‐2008)

2009 Balance

Remaining(2003‐2008) Remaining

Well D ill d

258 380 35,802 16,203Drilled 

StructuresInstalled

63 92.4 6,838 3,712Installed

Wells PA  592 424 19,599

Structures 158 141 3,126Removed

,

Page 15: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

US GOM– Deepwater Inventory

Structure Type Units

Fixed Platforms in Depth 400-600 ft (125 – 188 m) 41

Fixed Platforms, including Towers, in Depth 600 - 1700+ ft (188 – 530+ m) 29

Classic Spar 3

T S 12Truss Spar 12

Cell Spar 1

MiniDOC Spar 2

Mini or New Generation Tension Leg Platform (MTLP) 6

Conventional Tension Leg Platform (TLP) 9

Semi Submersibles (Semi) 8

TOTAL 111

Page 16: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

US Pacific OCS Inventory

Platform Water Depth Total Name (ft) Weight

A 188 6,405

B 190 6,535

C 192 5,796

Edith 161 9,147

Ellen 265 14,016

Elly 255 9,400

Eureka 700 38,360

Gail 739 33,924

Gilda 205 11,690

Gina 95 1,426

Grace 318 11,256

Habitat 290 9,044

Harmony 1,198 78,380

Harvest 675 32,815

Henry 173 4,046

Heritage 1,075 67,515

Hermosa 603 29,516

Hidalgo 430 22,478

Hillhouse 190 5,929

Hogan 154 5,497

Hondo 842 28,713

Houchin 163 5,977

Irene 242 8,646

Page 17: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 18: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 19: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Hurricane Damage:Hurricane Damage: Major Impact in GOM sinceMajor Impact in GOM since

2005

Page 20: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

What Changes After Hurricane Damage?

Everything, except the Regulations 

Decommissioning Costs increase by     10x or more10x or more

Page 21: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Typical 2005 Hurricane Katrina Typical 2005 Hurricane Katrina DamageDamageDamageDamage

Page 22: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Hurricane Katrina Damage (cont )Hurricane Katrina Damage (cont )Hurricane Katrina Damage (cont.)Hurricane Katrina Damage (cont.)

Page 23: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

2008 Hurricane Ike Damaged Platforms2008 Hurricane Ike Damaged Platforms

Page 24: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Vermilion 281 A– BeforeVermilion 281 A Before

Page 25: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

The Platform – AfterThe Platform After

Page 26: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 27: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 28: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 29: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 30: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 31: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 32: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 33: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 34: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa
Page 35: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

The Regulatory Environment:In a high state of flux: New people

in the BOEMRE (formerly MMS)( y )

Supplemental Bonding continues pp gto be under review

Reefing options being challenged

New NTL to remove “Idle Iron”

Page 36: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

New Decommissioning NTLNew Decommissioning NTL

The NTL Defines “No longer useful for operations”The NTL Defines  No longer useful for operations  which is used in the regulations for:

• Wells• No production 5 years

• No plans for future operations

• Platforms• Toppled

• Has not been used in past 5 years for operations associated with exploration, development or production of oil/gasof oil/gas

Page 37: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Idle Wells and Facilities

Page 38: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

USA Decommissioning Summary & Conclusions

• The GOM has a long history in Decommissioning.• The regulatory climate has grown uncertainThe regulatory climate has grown uncertain.• Deepwater Fixed Platform complete removal may be a challenge.g

• Limited availability of resources may be a challenge, particularly on the US West Coast.

• Reversibility a major issue in some deepwater systems.

Page 39: 2010 12 14 Byrd  Decommissioning In The Usa

Questions?