200G/400G Transceivers - High Speed test challenges · Introduction test solutions 100G to...
Transcript of 200G/400G Transceivers - High Speed test challenges · Introduction test solutions 100G to...
200G/400G Transceivers - High Speed testchallenges
Kees Propstra
Outline
▪ Transceiver evolution
▪ Transceiver overview
▪ Introduction test solutions
▪ 100G to 200G/400G transition
▪ Measurement challenges
▪ Solutions
Transceiver evolution
2000 2010 20202005 2015
QSFP28
OSFP
QSFP-DD
QSFP+
SFP1G
10G
100G
400G
40G
SFP+
graph for illustrative purposes only
What is next?
Embedded optical module
FiberASIC
PCBA
FiberASIC w/ photonics
PCBA
ASIC Re-timerOptical
Module
PCBA
QSFP28 ModuleMid-Board Optics
ModuleCo-packaged ASIC & Photonics
Courtesy: Luxtera
Credit: Intel
Transceiver overview
Block diagram for 100G-SR4 PMD
Credit: IEEE 802.3bm-2015
Block diagram for 100G-CWDM4 PMD
Credit: CWDM4_MSA_Technical_Spec
Introduction test solutions
▪ BERT - Bit Error Rate Tester
▪ DSO – Digital Sampling Oscilloscope
▪ TDR – Time Domain Reflectometry
TDR
Tx
Rx
DU
T
DSOBERT
Signal migration from 100G to 200/400G
25G NRZ vs. 50/100G PAM4
25G NRZ
53GBaud PAM4
NRZ
▪ Mask margin is key figure of merit
PAM4
▪ 4 levels, 3 eyes, 12 transitions
▪ Simple mask margin probably not a good predictor of link performance
▪ Effect of fiber link
▪ Receiver equalization
Why PAM4?
Transmission channels arelossy
▪ 10 dB at 13 GHz typical
Modulator bandwidths arelimited
▪ 40 GHz available today
PAM4 Modulation
▪ Same data throughput at half the frequency
▪ Double data rate at the same frequency
▪ 2 bits/symbol, data rate = 2 x symbol rate
one symbol
Measurement Challenges - Optical
TDECQ - is the new TX metric
Transmitter Dispersion Eye Closure (Quaternary)
▪ TDECQ is the “new” mask margin test of PAM4, it is a predictor of a system performance of a PAM4 transmitter
▪ TDECQ Calculates the dB ratio of how much noise can be added to the transmitter signal while meeting the target symbol error ratio
▪ TDECQ measurements should mimic what’s expected for a real receiver
▪ There is good correlation between TDECQ and link performance
R is noise margin at a fixed symbol error rate
▪ Higher R is better
▪ Lower TDECQ is better
Worst case fiber environment Reference receiver
TDECQ Measurement Accuracy
It is critical that measurement accuracy is ensured and that multiple test vendors provide identicalresults
▪ Measurement equipment correction
▪ System Impulse Response Correction – compensate the measurement channel to meet the IEEE defined filter characteristic
▪ Scope Noise Compensation – TDECQ measurement has a measurement system noise compensation factor
▪ Correlation
▪ Multi-vendor test correlation
▪ IEEE provided standard waveform (mazzini_3cd_01a_0518)
▪ Correlation typical 0.2 dB
R is noise margin
s = O to E and oscilloscope noise
ML 1.91 dB
-25
-30
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
Tra
nsfe
r[d
B]
0 1E+10 2E+10 3E+10 4E+10 5E+10
Frequency [GHz]
scope BW
Ideal BT4
TEK 1.95 dB
SIRC
Measurement Challenges - Electrical
Typical Test Configuration
5 10 15 20 25 30 350 40
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
dB
(S(1
,3))
Instrument
DUTConnector
Pristine signal Distorted signalChannel
▪ No measurements possible on the signal after the channel without de-embedding!
▪ Effect of the channel must be de-embedded. This can either be done using a VNA or a DSO
Freq, GHz
Compensating for Channel Losses
PPG
DUTConnector
DSO
ED
Method 1: DSO De-embedding▪ Using s-parameters generated in a VNA or a simulation tool▪ Using s-parameters measured by the DSO
Method 2: FFE taps generated by DSO and used to configure the PPG signal shaper so it compensates for channel losses (Tx equalization)
Method 3: Error-Detector of the BERT uses an equalizer (FFE, DFE, CTLE) to de-embed channel losses (Rx equalization)
Example of De-embedding using a Scope
DSODUT
Connector
DUT signal after Compensating for the trace losses
DSO measures and de-embeds the channel in frequencydomain
FFE Equalization at 53 GBd using a DSO/PPG
PPG
DUTConnector
DSO
ED
Distorted signal from channel FFE taps from DSO loaded In PPG
DSO calculates FFE taps
Solutions
Time Domain Analysis
Frequency Domain Analysis
dB
m
SolutionsML4035Cable test, impedance 4 CH 35 GHz
ML4039D/79DBERT 4/8CH28 GBd, 56 Gbps
ML4015DElectrical DSO 32/50 GHz
ML4039EBERT 4CH56 GBd, 112 Gbps
ML4015DOptical DSO 25/40 GHz SM/MM
ML1016D-CROptical Clock Recovery26/53 GBd PAM4
THANK YOU