2009 Terrazzo and Mosaic Floor in Interwar Buildings in Athens: Conservation issues
-
Upload
laura-tapini -
Category
Documents
-
view
110 -
download
2
description
Transcript of 2009 Terrazzo and Mosaic Floor in Interwar Buildings in Athens: Conservation issues
T E R R A Z Z O A N D M O S A I C F L O O R S
I N I N T E R W A R B U I L D I N G S I N A T H E N S :
Exam. number: Y2265156
MA in CONSERVATION STUDIES
February 2009
The University of YorkDepartment of Archaeology
C o n s e r v a t i o n I s s u e s
To my parents
who have taught me that knowledge is power
but also how to dance over difficulties
…τα πιο ωραία λαϊκά σε σπίτια µε µωσαϊκά τα είχαµε χορέψει…
(..our best folk songs were danced on terrazzo floored houses …) Nikolakopoulou, L.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 i
5. Discussion
Abstract
Abstract
L. M. T.
MA in Conservation Studies, Department of Archaeology, the University of York
Dissertation Title: Terrazzo and Mosaic floors in Interwar Buildings in Athens:
Conservation Issues
The present research explores the use of terrazzo and mosaic floors in the
Interwar buildings of Greece, particularly in its capital Athens. The main objective
is to demonstrate that floors are a highly important element of architectural
expression and therefore worth preserving. The paper’s aim is to highlight how
these ancient techniques, while remaining unaltered in time, were also used in a
modern architectural context. The architectural and social context related to
these floor finishes will be examined in order to understand their use and
subsequently how location and use affected their preservation status. Finally,
going through an analysis of how classic conservation principles should be
modified, some proposals for their theoretical and practical conservation issues
will be formulated.
Number of pages: xxi + 91
Number of illustrations: 79 in the chapters and 252 in the case study cards
Number of case studies cards: 58 (45 in chapter 3 and 13 in the appendix)
Appendices: 2 (13 cards)
This dissertation contains secondary resources: bibliographic, unpublished and
web, and primary resources: archives, interviews.
February 2009
Table of Contents
List of Images
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
i The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
5. Discussion
Table of contents Table of Contents
Abstract
Table of Contents‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐i
List of Figures‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐v
Preface‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ix
Acknowledgments‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐x
Introduction‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐xi
Literature review‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐xvi
Chapter 1
1.1 Pavements‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐1
1.2 From Battuto to Terrazzo ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐2
1.2.1 Contemporary Terrazzo ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐4
1.3 From Battuto to Mosaics‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐6
1.3.1 Pebble Mosaics‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐7
1.3.2 Tesserae Mosaics‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐8
Mosaic‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 9
1.3.3 Modern Mosaic techniques‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐10
1.4 Terrazzo and Mosaic similarities ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐12
1.5 Mosaic and terrazzo differences ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐12
1.6. Conclusion‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐13
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
ii The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
5. Discussion
Table of contents
Chapter 2
2. Interwar social impact and Architecture in Athens‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐14
2.1 Interwar new social conditions in Greece‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐14
2.1.1 Emigration‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐15
2.1.2 Economy‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐15
2.1.3 Social balances‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐17
2.2 Urbanization of Athens‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐17
2.2.1 State measures‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐18
2.2.2 Modified Center and new suburbs‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐19
2.2.3 Legislation for horizontal property‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐21
2.3 Architectural typologies‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐22
2.3.1 Neo‐academism‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐24
2.3.2 Popular style‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐25
2.3.3 Modernist‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐26
2.3.4 Modern Movement‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐27
2.4 Conclusion‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐28
Chapter 3
3. Case Studies‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐30
3.1 Methodology‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐30
3.1.1 Building Data‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐30
3.1.2 Floor Data‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐31
3.2 Case studies‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐32
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
iii The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
5. Discussion
Table of contents
3.2.1 Neo‐academic buildings‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐32
3.2 Case studies‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐33
3.2.2 Popular style buildings ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐33
3.2 Case studies‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐34
3.2.3 Modernist buildings‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐34
3.2 Case studies‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐35
3.2.3 Modern Movement Buildings‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐35
3.3 Type of Architecture and choice of floor finish ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐36
3.3.1 Simple Terrazzo‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐37
3.3.2 Terrazzo with decorative patterns‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐38
3.3.3 Mosaic‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐40
3.4 Choice of floor finish and preservation status‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐42
3.4.1 Simple terrazzo‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐42
3.4.2 Terrazzo with decorative patterns‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐43
3.4.3 Mosaic‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐44
3.5 Conclusion‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐46
Chapter 4
4. Contemporary Conservation approach to Recent Architecture ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐48
4.1 Historical overview of Architectural Conservation in Europe ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐48
4.2 Conservation of the recent architectural past‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐50
4.2.1 Authenticity in conserving our Recent Architectural Past‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐53
4.2.2 Minimum intervention in conserving our Recent Architectural Past‐‐54
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
iv The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
5. Discussion
Table of contents
4.3 Conservation approach on the Architectural Heritage in Greece‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐55
4.3.1 Conservation of the recent architectural past in Greece‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐57
4.5 Conclusion‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 58
Chapter 5
5. Discussion‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐60
5.1 Interwar architecture’s conservation issues‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐60
5.2. Economics and conservation: a proposal‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐62
5.3 Public awareness‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐64
5.4 Guidelines for restoration problems‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐65
5.4.1 Deposits – Cleaning‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐67
5.4.2 Cracks ‐ Mortar Filling‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐68
5.4.3 Lacunae – Integration‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐69
5.4.4 Erosion ‐ Consolidation ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐71
5.4.5 Extremely decayed floors‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐72
5.4.6 Documentation of the interventions ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐72
5.5 Conclusion‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐73
Chapter 6
6. Conclusion‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐74
Appendix
Appendix 1 (case studies)‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐75
Appendix 2 (elliniki etairia research)‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐76
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
v The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
5. Discussion
Table of contents
Resources
Primary Resources‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐77
Archives‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐77
Interviews‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐77
Secondary resources‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐78
Bibliograpic‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐77
Unpublished‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐88
Web resources‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐90
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 vi
5. Discussion
List of images
List of figures
I. Introduction
I.1 Google Earth
Chapter 1
1.1 Assimakopoulou‐Atzaka, P (2003): page 13
1.2 Author
1.3 Fiorentini‐Roncuzzi, I and Fiorentini, E (2001): page 106
1.4 Author
1.5 De Chiara, J Panero, J and Martin, Z (2001), page 826
1.6 Author
1.7 Fiori, C, Tolis, N and Canestrino, C (2003), page 145
1.8 Bertelli, C (1988), page 17
1.9 Author
1.10 Tosi, M (2004b): page 128
1.11 Getty Conservation Institute (2003):‘Illustrated Glossary: Mosaics In Situ
Project.’
1.12 Lavagne, H (1987), no page, image 15
1.13‐16 Author
Chapter 2
2.1 Veremis, T (2008), page 184
2.2 http://www.fhw.gr/chronos/14/gr/1923_1940/civilization/choros/02.html, Photo archives E.L.I.A. © Hellenic Literature and Historical archive Ελληνικό
2.3 Arseni, K (2004), page 168
2.4 Arseni, K (2004), page 169
2.5 Arseni, K (2004), page 264
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 vii
5. Discussion
List of images
2.6 http://www.fhw.gr/chronos/14/gr/1923_1940/civilization/choros/02.html
, Photo archives, Ν 1732 Nelly's, © Benaki Museum
2.7 Arseni, K (2004), page 80
2.8 Koumanoudis, I (2001), page 25
2.9 Koumanoudis, I (2001), page 47
2.10 Chatzifotiou, Z (2003), page 69, ©archive of Geortgantas family
2.11 Archives of Bank of Greece ©
2.12 Vatopoulos, N (2002),page 97
2.13 ‐2.17 Author
Chapter 3
Case studies
Case studies figures numbered as c.s. 1 to 252 are photos made by the author
except for:
c.s. 3‐c.s. 4 http://www.eie.gr/archaeologia/Gr/arxeio_more.aspx?id=250
c.s. 13 Kotsaki, A (2005), page 143 fig 82
c.s. 23 http://www.eie.gr/archaeologia/gr/arxeio_more.aspx?id=214
c.s. 34‐ c.s. 35 Karakostas personal family archive
c.s 44 http://www.eie.gr/archaeologia/gr/arxeio_more.aspx?id=184
c.s. 45‐50 Bank of Greece Archives
c.s. 59‐60 Fessa‐Emmanouil, E and Marmaras, V (2005) page 22
c.s. 70‐ c.s.71 Byzantine and Christian Museum archives
c.s 82‐ c.s. 83 Byzantine and Christian Museum archives
c.s. 84 Neo‐Hellenic Archives of Architecture, Benaki Museum ©
c.s. 102 Malliaris family personal archive
c.s. 113 Fessa Emmanouil , E and Maramaras, V (2005,) page 203
c.s. 136 http://www.eie.gr/archaeologia/gr/arxeio_more.aspx?id=165
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 viii
5. Discussion
List of images
c.s. 143. Courtesy of Flenga‐Kouremenou Marina: photographer Nikolaidou Louiza
c.s. 144 Vatopoulos (2002), page 117
c.s. 177 Fessa Emmanouil , Eand Maramaras, V (2005,) page 189
c.s. 179‐ c.s 180 Fessa Emmanouil , Eand Maramaras, V (2005,) page 189
c.s. 190 courtesy of Tzartzanis Nikos
c.s. 201 http://www.agsavvas‐hosp.gr/site/main/details.php?type=1&catID=52&lang=el
3.1 ‐3.7 Author
3.8 Elliniki Etairia unpublished research
3.9 – 3.17 Author
3.18‐3.22 Bank of Greece archives (unpublished)
3.23‐ 3.26 Author
Chapter 4
4.1 Frerigang, C Kremier J (2003), page 349 from: p.202 of ‘Dictionaire raisonne de l’architecture francaise du XI au XVI siecle’ IV volume
4.2 Ruhl, C (2003), page 466 from: tab.4, ‘The Seven lamps of Architecture’, IV ed.
4.3 Arseni, k (2004) page 89
4.4 Author
Chapter 5
5.1 http://areopagitou17.blogspot.com/
5.2‐5.3
http://www.monumenta.org/article.php?IssueID=4&perm=1&ArticleID=316&CategoryID=23&lang=gr
5.4 – 5.12 Author
Preface
Aknowledgments
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
ix The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
5. Discussion
Preface
Preface
My first contact with the historical profile of contemporary Athens was in 1999,
reading an article by Nikos Vatopoulos (1999) entitled ‘Multi‐storey buildings are
becoming classical’. I was then completing my undergraduate studies in
Restoration of Antiquities and was at first shocked by the writer’s positions. He
claimed that some of these multi‐storey concrete buildings have a strong
historical value portraying, an interesting architectural history that did not stop
either in 1930 or in 1960, not even nowadays, reflecting the city’s contemporary
history. It arose many questions in my mind and awakened my interest for
conservation of recent architecture, leading me to study Conservation of
Historical Buildings at the University of York.
Therefore I looked for a subject for my research that would fulfill my desire to go
deep into studying issues related to recent architectural conservation and the
architectural evolution of my city as well. Once I realized the strict relationship of
terrazzo and mosaics to their ancient predecessors, the subject became clear to
me. I wanted to study how, in one of the considered birth places of artificially
made floors, the technique was still in use in more recent constructions. The
Interwar years, being an extremely interesting time range for Greece and the
architecture of Athens, gave me the opportunity to limit my research interest to
a specific period of twenty years. In short, contrasting classical conservation
knowledge and onsite experience on ancient floors to the different needs of
conserving a floor in a recent building, gave me fertile ground for research. The
results of this research, for me, introduce a subject worth considering and also
studied further in the future.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
x The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
5. Discussion
Acknow
ledgments Acknowledgments
I would like to thank all those who helped me during this research without whom the completion of this paper would have been impossible: Dr Peter Gouldsborough, who having directed two years of what I would like to call ‘the York experience’ rather than the MA, was an extraordinary supervisor for me. His very clarifying guidelines on how to set up any kind of research and his accurate supervision observations made me, to the very last moment, think, reflect and develop my initial questions and observations; The staff of the consulted archives of: the Neo‐Hellenic Architecture Archive of the Benaki Museum with special mention to their very kind secretary; the Bank of Greece; the Byzantine and Christian Museum and the archeologist Nikos Konstantios; the Ellliniki Etairia‐ SAK (Council for Conservation of Architectural Heritage) and the architect Katerina Chatzikonstantinou; the officers of the ‘Armed Forces Officers Club’ ; the owners that warmly allowed me into their houses to study and made photographs also giving me some of their time for an interview: Margo Chatzinikoli, Nikos Georgiadis, dr Athanasios Kardaras, Marina Flenga‐Kouremenou, the Karakostas Family, Eleni and Panagiotis Malliaris, Ina Meleggoglou, Admiral Moralis , Stathis Perdikis, Nikos Tartzanis Marina and George Zombanakis; the architects Efi Kalliga, Christos Deligiannis and Ioanni Koumanoudis for their personal comments on my subject; my friends and colleagues: Antonis Bekiaris, Maria Krini and Michalis Bardanis, who always had their eyes open to find and propose buildings that could be of interest for this research. all my family and friends who stood by me, reminding me that there is a life also after the interwar, helping me keep the balance between study and real life. and above all, my fantastic, extra patient proofreader, who survived through my Italian point of view about the English language.
IntroductionI
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xi
I. Introduction
I. Introduction
The present research aims at analyzing and understanding the use of terrazzo
and mosaic floors of Interwar buildings in the Greek capital, Athens, and issues
on their conservation.
Mosaics and Terrazzo are ancient arts used in different architectural contexts
since they offer both excellent mechanical characteristics and possibilities for
artistic creativity.
Floors, as underlined in a recent study by Bucci, Farioli, and Guarieri, (2006, 85)
are one of the major witnesses of the culture of habitation through the centuries,
but have often been undervalued or even destroyed. The main objective of this
study is therefore to underline the importance of this ancient artistic form in a
modern context and why it is as valuable as to be worth preserving.
Trying to collect as many relevant data for a subject, to which unfortunately not
enough attention has yet been given, the following main questions will be dealt
with. First, the relation between terrazzo and mosaic will be examined through a
historic overview of the evolution and fabrication of these artifacts. Then, an
analysis of the social changes of Interwar and the new architectural profile of the
city, as well as questions on the relation between social classes and choice of
architecture will be presented. Once the social significance of these changes is
clarified case studies of the various architectural styles will be examined, in
search for a relation between social class and choice of floors and also how the
various techniques and uses have influenced their preservation status.
Subsequently and before proposing any solutions, the different applications of
conservation theories when it comes to conservation of recent architecture will
be investigated. In conclusion, after integrating the observations of the issues,
some proposals will be presented on why these floors should be conserved and
how, both from a theoretical and a practical point of view.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xii
I. Introduction
I.i Limitations of the research
Before dealing with the research, a short presentation of the geographical and
chronological limits of the subject will be briefly presented.
I.i.i Geographical span: Greece, Athens
Already from the times of Plinius, as reported by Bertelli (1988, 10), there are
studies that relate to the birth of artificial pavements in the Hellenic area. I
therefore found it extremely interesting to analyze the use of this art and craft in
this same area yet in the modern context of contemporary Greece.
As the subject has enormous possibilities of analysis I decided to concentrate my
research on the capital of Greece, Athens, because contemporary Athens
accurately represents, socially, artistically and financially, what is happening in
the country as a whole.
The capital of Greece is situated in the southeastern part of the mainland of the
Hellenic peninsula (fig. I.1). There is a deep relationship between Athens and its
monumental and historical profile. This is a natural consequence for a city where,
as Pantelidou‐Gkofa (1997, 23) explains, continuous forms of habitation are
present from ca 4000‐4500 a.C. until today.
Figure I.1: Location of
Athens Source: Google
Earth
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xiii
I. Introduction
What people tend to undervalue is that there is a starting point for the modern
new capital. After the establishment of the new free state of Greece in 1830, the
city of Athens became its capital in 1833. Even though in those years according to
travelers’ reviews reported by Iliopoulos (2000, 69), Biris (1996,9) and Travlos
(1967, 9) , the city looked very damaged and miserable; it was selected, ecause of
its long and glorious past (Koutsoukos 1984, 13) underlines, due to the long
glorious history of the place.
Pantelodimou (1997, 136) notes, that from that day on a continuous development
of the city with new buildings was taking place for almost a century.
Koumantaropoulou and Michailidis (1994) state that this development was
related principally to the State and the Kingdom, depending at the same time on
sponsorships of expatriated Greeks and, on a smaller scale, on private initiatives.
The flow of constant development was interrupted at the beginning of the
twentieth century. The First World War and the Balkan wars related thereto,
exhausted Greece morally and financially. The end of the war is closely related to
the first population explosion in Athens, as Johns (2007, 88), Tsounis (2004, 14)
and Clogg (2002, 125) describe. Yet, and in spite of the unstable political situation,
after the initial shock, the Interwar period, represents for Athens a fertile ground
of redevelopment visibly manifested through architectural creations. Only
recently has this period been evaluated as a milestone in contemporary Greek
Architecture.
I.ii Time span: Interwar
Tapini (2007, 1) defines that historians specify Interwar as the time period
between 1918‐1939, beginning with the peace treaties at the conclusion of the
Great War –later called World War I – and ending with the outbreak of World War
ΙΙ in September 1939.
Greece, as the rest of Europe at that time, was characterized by fluidity and
instability. To understand the political and social situation in Greece and its
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xiv
I. Introduction
effects on Architecture we need to run through a short overview of the general
conditions of the Interwar period worldwide.
I.ii.i Inter‐war worldwide
The Interwar period presents great interest for study in different sectors, as it is
the starting point for a social, economic and artistic transformation that
characterized the century to follow.
To begin with, as Fisher (1957, 1221) explains, the greatest future of that period is
that all previous political balances ceased to exist. The Great War was fought
between the most “civilized” countries in Europe; the Austro‐Hungarian Empire,
Kaiser’s Germany, the Ottoman Empire and Tsarist Russia; by its end the empires
collapsed and therefore Europe had to be redefined.
Markezinis (1968, 262) underlines that during the new redefinition of Europe,
America comes on the scene as a key factor in international politics. This
accelerated general social reforms at the same time incising global economy.
Therefore, when the rapid growth of America’s economy violently collapsed ‐ the
1929 Wall Street “Great Crash”–more than twenty million people worldwide
were condemned to deep unemployment. That created new political instabilities
and a wide mistrust towards political systems and social values.
On the other hand and on the opposite side of the globe, Russia’s 1917 Bolshevik
revolution was proposing a different solution to capitalism. The revolution,
followed by the growth of Stalinism was, as per Kosmidis (1997, 254), another
shock and a threat to the political and social equilibrium throughout Europe.
For all this uncertainty Overy (1999, 76) explains that, even though in 1920 most
European countries followed some kind of democracy, they gradually became
dictatorships. Interwar, as per Keynes (1974, 360) was the period of history
conducted by ideologies and not by human everyday needs.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xv
I. Introduction
I.ii.ii Interwar in Greece
Following the international political situation Greece faces an extremely unstable
period. Kassimatis (1992, 439) excellently defines the Interwar years for Greece
as the most tragic and anomalous times which bear their mark on the modern
state’s balances until today.
Numerous significant political changes occurred in less than 20 years. Kyriakidis
(2001, 205) synthesizes this instability; the abolishment of monarchy, the return
to democracy and vice versa, as well as the establishment of two dictatorships;
all these shape the Greek political situation of the Interwar.
The most incisive result of a series of erroneous political decisions for Greece was
definitely the Asia Minor catastrophe in 1922. From then on and all through the
Interwar years what characterizes all the Greek social and economical
transformations in the country are related to the huge problem of sudden
overpopulation.
The most interesting fact of this period is that, as Rigos (1992, 405) describes, at
a time of tremendous economical problems, ideological disorientation, and full
social redefinition, ideologist of the time faced it as an opportunity for the rebirth
of the country. The starting point was Athens, the capital that would be
transformed into a Metropolis. There, through continuous battle between the
old and conservative and the new and modern, innovative and interesting
experimentations occurred in all the arts, but especially in Architecture.
Having introduced the main subject of this paper and located it in time and
space, we will now proceed to a brief analysis of what literature has been already
published. This literature review will be a preamble to the topic before the
systematic presentation of the results of this study in the relative chapters.
Literature ReviewII
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xvi
II. Literature review
II. Literature review
The main scope of this research is to understand and evaluate terrazzo and
mosaic floors. In the modern approach towards Interwar buildings these floors,
even though related with a long history and tradition, are often not considered
worth preserving.
To comprehend my subject the first step of my research was to find bibliography
resources. Before presenting my point of view on the subject of the research the
main sources will be reviewed, commented on and related separately each to the
central subject of the responding chapter.
II.i Mosaics and Terrazzo
Guarino’s (2004) observation on the vague and confusing use of the term mosaic
is the core of the first chapter, where the birth and evolution of these arts and
crafts are analyzed historically and technically.
To begin with, the definition for artificial floor finishes is given as presented by Orsini
(2004a) and Marini (2003). There are too few specific studies or references to the birth
of constructed pavements. The only valuable source for the specific area of my study,
the Hellenic area, was published by Orlandos (1989).
Moving from the general definition of pavements to the study of terrazzo and
mosaics several publications are available, from which the most significant will
now be presented, subdivided into three main categories.
First are the historical studies that analyze the history of the birth and evolution
of this art. There are complete books dedicated to the subject of mosaics but it is
quite interesting that different studies have different approaches, not so much
as regards the evolution but as to the time and place of their birth.
For example the analysis of the history and evolution of this art by Lavagne
(1988), leaves open the question of where and how many times this art has been
reinvented in the Mediterranean area in the antiquity. Bertelli (1988) is of the
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xvii
II. Literature review
same opinion, yet he does mention the ancient source of Plinius, who attributes
the invention of mosaic to the Greeks. The opinion of these two scholars is
contradicted by Asimakopoulou‐Atzaka (2003), Chatzidakis (2003), Dunabin
(1999) and Ling (1998), who place the birth of this art definitely in the ancient
Greek world. The texts of Lavagne and Bertelli have been very helpful as they
extend the overview till the present days; however, the positions on the origin
query in the other publications have been considered more accurate as they are
derived from specific archeological studies on ancient mosaics.
The introductory texts of exhibition catalogues on the birth and evolution of the
art have been very useful for cross‐referencing of the consulted books. Bucci,
Farioli, Guarieri, (2006); Raimondi (2004); and Paris (1999) for instance analyze in
their articles the social meanings related to the differing choices from the variety
of artificial pavement types. Finally, Orsini (2004b) wrote an excellent article
linking the historical review to the evolution of the techniques of this art.
The more thorough analyses of specifications and differences between the
various techniques always begin by referring to the ancient sources. The ancient
recipes reported by Vitruvius, apart from the translation by Morgan, (1960), have
remained mainly unaltered in time and are the starting point for the studies of
Marini (2003), Fiorentini‐Roncuzzi, Fiorentini (2001), Galli, (1989) Kolefas, (1983).
The latter are extended studies on techniques, technology and evolution of the
art, and more or less report similar fabrication methodologies.
Having comprehended the historical and technical evolution of the art the study
has finally been focused on the literature relating to the so called contemporary
techniques. Going back to Lavagne’s text (1988) there is a good introduction on
modern mosaic and terrazzo techniques and particularly on the transformation
of the art during the industrial revolution ‐ a theme further analyzed in the article
by Bosia (2002). Extended descriptions of the technique of modern mosaics
fabrication were found in the two publications by Tosi (2004a, 2004b), who also
reports observations by De Luca (1989). Finally, the most accurate recipe and
description on terrazzo was published by Marini (2003) in the volume on the
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xviii
II. Literature review
Mosaics of Aquileia, where she explains the evolution of the different flooring
techniques in the area of Friuli.
Focusing on my subject I must underline the fact that all historical and technical
studies classify terrazzo and mosaic in the category of mosaics. However,
terrazzo ‐ batutto in antiquity – whenever compared to mosaic has always been
undervalued and regarded as poor craftsmanship and not an art. As a result
terrazzo is usually not given any attention and there is a gap of missing accurate
information in mosaic literature about it, both as a historical study and as a
report on conservation and repair matters.
II.ii Interwar social impact and architecture in Athens
Chapter two is dedicated to studying the socio‐economic background of Greece
during the Interwar years and its effect on architecture.
To trace an outline of the formation of the new social fabric in the Interwar city
of Athens, its new economy and the new social balances brought about by the
sudden overpopulation, different historical texts have been consulted. Wide
differences were noted in the observations of Greek and foreign scholars. Texts
of Greek writers in general, like Kyriakidis (2001) and Vournas (1997), give more
detailed data on the period but unfortunately their points of view bear strong
traces of their personal political views. However, another Greek scholar, Veremis
(2008) gave an impartial study of the period under observation. The data was
further cross checked with very useful and more objective sources, i.e. the
studies of foreigners like John (2007), Clogg (2002) and Kaplan (2002).
All the texts emphasized that the greatest effect of these fast changes in the
social texture of the built environment was the expansion of the city of Athens,
which finally acquired an urban profile. First Tournikiotis (1991) and Galani (1997)
note the important state measures, very detailed data on which are reported in
the unpublished thesis of Kosmaki (1991). State and privates constructed all over
the region of Attica, as reported by Kairofillas (1988), Giacumacatos (1999) and
Kaukala (1999). But it is only Biris (2003) who makes an important note on the
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xix
II. Literature review
illegality of many of those constructions. Finally a very important source of
information regarding this urban evolution were two special publications on the
birth and evolution of the multi‐storey building: one by Marmaras (1991) with
legal and technical specifications and another by Constantopoulos (1999) who
focused on its social projections.
As a result of these new socio‐economic factors different architectural typologies
were developed. The approach to recent architecture is mutable in time. It is
therefore characteristic that the first publication on that period, written in 1966
by Biris(1996), is very critical and speaks of a devaluation of architecture.
Nowadays the approach has changed and has become favourable, with more
studies and texts dealing with the architecture of that time. Even so, writers do
not seem to agree on what the prevalent typologies are. Vatopoulos (2002,
2000) speaks of eclecticism and neoclassicism, art nouveau and art deco, and
modern movement but does not mention anything about popular architecture.
On the contrary, Cholevas (1998, 1994) who based his study on the architects of
that time, dedicates a large part of his study to Popular style. Through this study,
concentrating on architects inventing or using different styles, I perceived the
experimentation character of the time, a combination of many different
influences. Biris’ (2003) research, even though focused on neoclassicism, a style
that disappeared in the Interwar, is a valuable clarification of what is modernist
and its distinction from the modern movement. Finally, the most detailed
publications on the modern movement are those by Tournikiotis (2000) and
Giacumacatos (2004). However these two do not agree on the diffusion of the
modern movement; Tournikiotis maintains that it was also very much used by
the state whereas Giacumacatos that it had flourished more in the private sector.
Having looked at the various points of view, the article of Giacumacatos (1999)
and the publications by Fessa‐Emmanouil and Marmara (2005) and Kolonas
(2006) were selected for the creation of a basis for the classification in the
present study. This selection was based on the fact that these three summarized
the information of the rest of the publications in a logical manner.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xx
II. Literature review
II.iii Case studies and Conservation
The third chapter is entirely concentrated on the collection of data. This
procedure started with the photographs the photographs in the publications by
Fessa‐Emmanouil and Marmara (2005), Vatopoulos (2002) and Fillippids (2001)
which served as guides in the search for example buildings that might have floors
interesting for this study.
II.iv Contemporary Conservation approach to Modern Architecture
Once the various cases and their particular traits were sorted out and before
discussing any solutions a chapter on the transformation of earlier philosophical
issues and practical approaches was deemed necessary. Conservation of recent
architecture is quite a modern issue but it is the offspring of two centuries’
debates among conservation scientists and practitioners.
The history of conservation has been written through the ideas and distinctive
personalities of different scholars, each of them influencing the formation of the
philosophical background of the science. Valuable and detailed observations
about them were found in dedicated monographs (Curuni 2005, 1996; Esposito
2005; La Regina 2005; Napoleone 2005c; Carbonara 1996; de Martino G.1996; de
Martino R. 1996; Di Biase 1996; Marmotti‐ Politi 1996; Pretelli 1996; Vassalo 1996).
Ceschi in 1970, followed on the same grounds by Sette (2001), presented a
combined analysis of personalities and movements which was quite elucidating.
Furthermore History by Jokilehto (2005) linked a more universal approach to the
previous data introducing at the same time the non Eurocentric theories and also
issued related to the conservation of more recent constructions. A more detailed
treatise on the contemporary approach to conservation is found in the Theory by
Munoz‐ Vinas (2005) with a critical and also realistic approach, yet confronting
theorists and maximum conservation axioms like authenticity and minimum
intervention.
Focusing on the main subject of the chapter, that is, which of the so called ‘classical
conservation’ principles is also applicable to the conservation of our recent architectural
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 xxi
II. Literature review
past, important data were traced in many articles of the DOCOMOMO conference
proceedings (1989, 1997, 1998, 2006). With the passage of time the interest in modern
architecture brought about the assembling of case studies in specific volumes like
‘Conservation of Modern Architecture’' (2007) presenting different interesting views by
the various writers. Finally, last year a volume by Prudon (2008) was published in the
United States, which I consider an excellent study both on philosophical and practical
issues as well as on their interrelationship.
All the above mentioned texts coincide in concluding that classical approach is not
applicable to recent architecture’s conservation. The only exception is the text by the
Italian Bardeschi (2004), where he strongly criticizes the mutated approach and
divulged reconstruction in modern buildings. For me though, his point is incorrect and
very distant from the real problems a conservation specialist has to deal with in cases of
recent architecture and therefore his point was not included in the chapter.
Lastly, studies on the conservation of the recent architectural past in Greece, the
geographical area of the study, were consulted. Concerning legal matters my references
were derived from the specialized text by Papapetropoulos (2006) who analyzes the
various points of the latest law on Heritage protection and from Ergolavou’s (2007)
unpublished research. As for the matter of safeguarding recent architectural heritage,
very interesting views were found in various journals. (Giacumacatos 2003; Rigopoulos
2005 & 2008; Papakonstantinou 2008), For me this demonstrates the beginning of a
growing interest for safeguarding recent architectural past in Greece.
In conclusion, three main resource areas were covered from bibliography sources:
The introduction to floor techniques, from a historical and technical point;
The Interwar social reflections on architecture through historical, social and
architectural studies
The evolution of Conservation Theory
Having reviewed the main bibliographic sources we will proceed with the observations
derived from the comparison of these data and on site research, presented in the
following chapters.
Pavements, Mosaics,Terrazzo,1
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 1
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
1. Pavements, Terrazzo, Mosaics
As a start for this text it is useful to make an overview of the birth and evolution
of the two techniques for artificially made floors, which are the main subjects of
this research: Terrazzo and Mosaics. This chapter clarifies the correlation
between these two techniques and their main differences; it also elucidates
terminology confusions.
The problem of terminology exists because, as Guarino (2004, 13) explains, the
term “mosaics” is used to describe floor finishes made in very different
techniques. In Greece there is an even deeper confusion because the term
μωσαϊκό (mosaic) is used for floors made by terrazzo technique while mosaics
are usually called ψηφιδωτό (tessellated).
To clear the matter a brief historical and technological review of the fabrication
techniques of these floors and pavements is therefore presented.
1.1 Pavements
The definition of a pavement from an architectural point of view is as per Curl’s
dictionary (2006, 564):
“Path surfaced with stones or other materials, including cement, cobbles, flags, rag
stones, square‐setts, tarmacadam, etc.”
Orsini (2004a, 27) explains that the birth of artificially made pavements was due
to the need for floors resistant to use and enviromental agents. When analyzing
the history of pavements it is worth understanding the root of the word
pavement. Marini (2003, 172) in his latest study notes that the word pavement
derives from the Greek verb παίω (paio) and later from the Latin verb pave. Paio
meant to beat or hit and the Latin pave to beat and level the ground. This
illustrates how the first forms of pavements were created by leveling the ground
by beating it, sometimes after mixing it with pebbles, rocks and different waste
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 2
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
materials of construction. Later the materials started to be mixed with the lime
mortar for higher resistance, so the first battuto floors were born.
1.2 From Battuto to Terrazzo
Orlandos (1994, 50) sustains that the in the Hellenic area use of lime‐mortar
beaten floors, the so‐called battuto, is prehistoric, that means before 800 b.C.
More specifically Asimakopoulou – Atzaka (2003, 11) dates some of the first
battuto floors back to the Minoan and Mycenaean eras with testimonials from
the palaces of the times (fig. 1.1).
The battuto floor (fig. 1.2) ‐ Latin term used internationally in scientific studies of
mosaic floors ‐ has been translated in English, according to Farneti’s glossary
(1993, 131), as cement pavement, lime‐ mortar‐ or beaten floor and stands for:
“General term for all concrete‐like floors made of lime mixed with sand, and beaten
down with rammers. Depending on the type of filler used i.e. powdered marble,
crushed brick or charcoal, the floor took on a white, red or black color. A few
limestone tesserae or marble chips were often inserted in a simple geometric
pattern”
Fig. 1.1 Early testimonials of battuto floor, Mallia, Crete, Greece Source: Assimakopoulou‐Atzaka (2003, 13)
Fig. 1.2 Battuto floor, Morgantina,
Sicily, Italy Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 3
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
The first notes on the manufacture of this type of floor finishes in antiquity come
from Vitruvius (1960, 203), considering this kind of foors as very important. The
construction steps for Vitruvius are:
First, ramming down the earth to create a solid soil and leveling it; next, laying the level broken stones, first the larger ones and then the smaller ones;
follows a layer of a mixture of stones and lime; the final layer, the “nucleus”, is composed of lime and pounded tile; to finish, the surface must be flattened and leveled with the help of a ruler.
Moving on time we have details on the battuto techniques, ( Lavagne 1985, 26), from the craftsmen of the region of Friuli in Italy, where this type of floor finishes was produced in the XVII cent. The technique, applied on beaten earth grounds or wooden slabs (fig 1.3 ), consisted in:
3 layers of lime mortar with aggregates, stones and pottery, of different sizes.
flattening of the surface with a big ruler. compressing the floor by beating.
It is obvious that the basic techniques were those of the roman times. Depicting
this flooring technique, Fiorentini (2001,105) describes how the Friulians have
developed the final treatment of the surface of the battuto floors to reach a
more compact and brilliant surface. This consisted in smoothing and polishing
the final layer when set. From then on these kinds of floor finishes will be called
terrazzo.
Fig. 1.3 Battuto production in Friuli, Italy
Source: Fiorentini‐Roncuzzi and Fiorentini (2001,106)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 4
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
In Farnetti’s (1993, 155) glossary we find the definition of terrazzo as:
“Flooring in which chips of marble are scattered at random or arranged to form
simple linear patterns on a cement matrix. On setting, the surface is ground smooth
to show a cross section of chips through the mixture.”
1.2.1 Contemporary Terrazzo
From the definition itself it becomes obvious that the terrazzo pavement is a
modern version of the battuto pavements of antiquity. The real changes came
about with the substitution of lime mortar for concrete. This, as Marini (2003,
175) underlines, provided the manufacturers with quicker results and harder
flooring finishes.
There are various techniques for creating a concrete based terrazzo floor. One is
very similar to the lime based floor practiced in the Friuli region, described by
Marini (2003, 175) as:
laying one foundation layer of armed concrete; the second layer (covering) consists of aggregates of different colours and sizes mixed with cement;
the third layer (setting) is a dry laying of marble powder mixed with cement, gradually wetted afterwards;
then, and while the third layer is still wet, the marble chips are spread on it;
as practiced in the traditional battuto, the final phases consist in rolling, beating, smoothing and polishing the surface.
Fig. 1.4 Concrete terrazzo, Athens University Students club, build in 1926, Athens
Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 5
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
There are infinite other variations thanks to the possibilities offered by the concrete mix and its potentialities. De Chiara, Panero, J and Martin, Z report a characteristic recipe (2001, 826), where a very thin and light but always resistant floor (fig.1.5) is created:
one layer of concrete slab; the second layer which is a mixture of different color and size aggregates and concrete;
also in this case the final phases consist in rolling, beating, smoothing and polishing.
From an on site analysis in an Interwar building in Athens, the layers in section, as
demonstrated in figure 1.6, appear to follow this scheme of thinnest terrazzo
(figure 1.4) with the final layer laid directly on the concrete slab. On the basis of
this case one may presume that Interwar terrazzo in Athens was constructed in
this method.
Having analyzed the techniques of manufacturing battuto and terrazzo
pavements one can definitely classify the terrazzo as the natural successor of the
primitive types of pavements. Although the technique survived with small
transformations for centuries, another similar and more artistic development of
the craft came about; Mosaics.
Fig. 1.5 Modern terrazzo with thin layers Source: De Chiara, J Panero, J and Martin, Z (2001, 826)
Fig. 1.6 Interwar terrazzo section (case study 21) Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 6
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
1.3 From Battuto to Mosaics
The insertion of pebbles, chips, or limestone tesserae in patterns characterized a
development in the floor finishes techniques and a passage from the battuto
floors to mosaics. This passage, as per Dunabin (1999, 18), cannot be defined as
an ordinary transition. Mosaic and battuto floors have been used alongside in the
same houses according to the significance and the importance of the rooms
(Orsini 2004b, Ling 1998, Dunabin 1999); sometimes even in the same floor, as in
some examples of the houses on the island of Delos (fig. 1.7).
Mosaics literally represent, as Torlo explains (2005, 7), the “patient work of the
Muses”. The terminology of the name manifests a certain respect on the part of
the ancients for their decorated pavements. Even so, Kolefas (1983,10) and
Chatzidakis (2003, 51) sustain that these floor finishes were used, other than for
their strong resistance, because they offered lovely aesthetic results at a low
cost. This was because in the early days of this art, cheap materials of waste from
construction were used, and that was definitely cheaper than a marble
pavement.
Fig. 1.7 Sample from the island of Delos,
with two techniques on the same floor
Source: Fiori, Tolis, and Canestrino (2003,145)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 7
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
1.3.1 Pebble Mosaics
The earliest testimonies of creating patterns on the battuto floors have been
discovered, as Assimakopoulou ‐ Atzaka (2003, 11) reports, at Mallia in Crete
inside a Minoan house from the Neolithic ages. This pavement has simple
geometric patterns made out of small pebbles (fig.1.1). Yet in the Hellenic area,
there are still no archeological evidences that may link these early floors with the
famous pebble mosaics of Pella in Macedonia of the classical times (fig.1.8 ). The
pebble mosaics of the end of the fifth to the third century b.C. have given us rich
testimonials of figurative and geometric decorations of floors in different
archeological sites, and are in extensive use till today all over Greece and the
Mediterranean (fig. 1.9).
Assimakopoulou‐Atzaka (2003, 17) further on to mentions that the first important
transition in the history of the mosaic art occurred during the third and second
centuries b.C.. In experimenting new techniques for more realistic
representations the use of cut stones or marbles, the tesserae, has been
Fig. 1.8 Pebble Mosaic floor detail, Ancient Pella, Macedonia , Greece Source: Beretlli (1988, 17)
Fig. 1.9 Pebble Mosaic floor of central square with inscription 1889, Spetses
island, Greece, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 8
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
introduced starting with mixed techniques of pebbles and tesserae. The creation
of the tesserae consisted in cutting the stones or the pebbles by hand with the
help of a hammer and a hardy (fig.1.10) into parallelepipeds. In fact the Latin
word tesserae derives from the Greek word for number four, τέσσερα (tessera),
referring to either the four angles or the four sides of their external surfaces. A
tessera is the smallest unit of any mosaic and the term is in use from then on until
today.
1.3.2 Tesserae Mosaics
The tesserae are the most significant factor in characterizing a mosaic. Many
changes of the tesserae, both in their forms and their uses, occurred from the
ancient times until today. This gave birth to different forms of mosaics and the
art moved on from floor to wall decoration and to work of art. These transitions
are widely analyzed in different studies (Atzaka 2003; Bertelli 1988; Fiorentini
2001; Kolefas 1983; Lavagne 1988; Raimondi 2004), but are not relative to this
study. The important question for the present paper is how the tesserae
characterizes mosaic floor finishes. The answer can again be found in Farnetti’s
glossary (1993, 140), where the definition of mosaic floors is:
“Mosaic executed on the floor and consisting of stone tesserae for greater wear
resistance. ….In antiquity floor mosaics were executed in situ using the direct method
after providing a suitable foundation. Nowadays, mosaic sections are set in the workshop
using the indirect method and then assembled in situ. The surface of floor mosaics is
usually polished to a smooth finish to withstand wear and tear of everyday use. ”
Fig. 1.10 Creation of tesserae
through stone cutting
Source: Tosi, M (2004b, 128)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 9
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
Mosaic
Basically a mosaic pavement consists of the tesserae and the binder. To
understand the fabrication of a mosaic floor we have to recall Vituvius’
description, which has been schematically reported by Farneti (1993, 128),
Fiorentini (2001, 130) and Loukianos (2003,43) (fig.1.11):
laying of “statumen” , the preparatory level made of big stones; followed by “rudus” , second preparatory level of lime mortar with large aggregates;
once it dries, follows the “nucleus” , a thinner preparatory layer of lime mortar and thinner aggregates;
finally a bedding layer of lime mortar is spread, where tesserae are inserted before it sets;
the mosaic surface was also flattened with a big ruler and the floor was compressed by beating.
This technique, called direct method, remained unaltered until the 19th century.
Cangemi (2001, 85) explains that even when modern materials are used, which
means less layers are required, the execution of mosaics by insertion of the
tesserae directly onto the permanent binder is called direct method.
Fig. 1.11 Mosaic
stratigraphy according to Vitruvious: 1:Statumen
2:Rudus 3:Nucleus 4:Bedding
layer 5:Tesserae
Source: Getty (2003,
unpublished)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 10
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
1.3.3 Modern Mosaic techniques
There are two significant evolutions in the history of manufacturing Mosaics. The
first appeared again in Friuli in Italy and relates to the posing techniques. Tosi
(2004a, 86) mentions that the mosaic artisan Gian Domenico Facchina invented
the indirect method around 1869‐74. As Lavagne (1988, 134) notes he must have
definitely been influenced by the method of detaching and transporting the
ancient mosaics from situ to museums. The indirect method consisted of the
following steps:
the design is revolved on paper; the tesserae are glued onto the paper; panels not larger than 50 x50 cm were created in the laboratory; once in situ the panels inserted on a cement mortar; when the cement was set=the glue and the water were washed away.
The advantages of this method stand in time saving and in the fact that the
mosaic, as it is created on an even surface it is already flat and needs no
flattening and smoothing.
Fig. 1.12 Mosaic created with the indirect
technique from precast
porcelain tiles in 1907 by E.Grasset
showing the fabrication
method. Source: Lavagne
(1987,img 15)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 11
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
The second major change occurred at the beginning of the XX century and
influenced the tesserae production. Up until that time all floor mosaics were
made out of stone tesserae for resistance to use. The fabrication of the stone
tesserae has been the same for centuries, i.e. always by hand cutting by the
traditional hammer and hardy.
At the beginning of the new century and amidst the industrial revolution the
precast tesserae were invented. These were now made out of vitreous glass tiles,
suitable for outside spaces and pavements or out of porcelain tiles. As Lavagne
(1988, 139) notes, this offered mosaics new prospects (fig.1.12). The color range
was now unlimited and combining the precast tesserae with the indirect method
marked the passage of mosaics from a solely artistic expression to an industrial
product.
One final notion should be made on the substitution of lime for concrete mortar
where, thanks to the strong adhesion power of concrete, tesserae do not need to
be planted deep into the mortar. This allowed for thinner tesserae. The precast
produced tesserae, thinner than the hand cut ones, reduced the total weight and
facilitated the transportation of mosaics created in a laboratory with the indirect
technique. In figures 1.13 and 1.14 there is a practical demonstration found in the
‘Ziller‐ Loverdou’ building in Athens.
Fig. 1.13 Tessera in section. (case study 8) Source: Author
Fig. 1.14 Section of lacuna (case study 8) Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 12
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
1.4 Terrazzo and Mosaic similarities
In conclusion, from antiquity on till nowadays, when analyzing terrazzo and
mosaic floor finishes one can observe lots of similarities. To begin with, we have
similar constitution materials, basically two: stones or other hard materials and a
bedding mortar. Then as per Tosi (2004b, 17), when studying the fabrication, the
battuto mortar can actually be incorporated in the preparatory laying layers of
the mosaic. It is significant that for Vitruvius, in his Tenth book of architecture, in
the chapter on floors, there is no clear distinction between battuto and mosaic
fabrication. He only notes a difference in the phrase “on the top of the nucleus,
the floor made out of slips or cubes”. So, if the structural part and elements are
very similar, we have to search for the differences in the communicative esthetic
part.
1.5 Mosaic and terrazzo differences
In both cases of these floor finishes we can observe an optic illusion of small
pieces organized in a uniform optic unity. In trying to define what differentiates a
mosaic from a terrazzo, it depends as per De Luca (1989, 12), on whether rules
are followed or not. For a mosaic to be characterized as such it should contain
organized patterns formed by tesserae and characterized by their shape, size,
and arrangement as well as the interstices of mortar between them (fig. 1.15).
Where these “rules” are not followed we have terrazzo floors (fig. 1.16).
Fig. 1.15 Mosaic particular from ‘Asaroton’, Aquileia, Italy Source: Author
Fig. 1.16 Terrazzo particular Petralona,
Athens, Greece Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 13
1. Pavem
ents; Mosaics and Terrazzo
1.6. Conclusion
After this small overview of the history of terrazzo and mosaic floors we can
accept sure that we are dealing with an artistic technique, unaltered in time even
in the existence of stylistic variations relative to time and place (Raimondi, 2004;
Galli, 1989; Bertelli, 1988). Bosia (2002, 379) reflects that the traditional technique
has never been entirely repudiated not even by the modern culture of
construction.
The most significant alteration has been the substitution of lime mortar for a
cement based mix. This, as per Locktov and Mastandrea (2003, 18), provided
durable and water resistant floors in quicker manufacture times. I think that it is
this slight modernization in the manufacturing that allowed the incorporation of
terrazzo and mosaics in the buildings of the interwar period in Greece. As we will
further analyze Interwar constructions in Greece were mainly concrete based,
there is therefore a concordance of materials of the main building with the
terrazzo and mosaic floors.
Having clarified the correlation and the differences between terrazzo and
mosaic, the next chapter will be dealing with the connection between
architecture style of the buildings containing terrazzo and mosaics and the new
social texture of the Greek capital during the Interwar years.
Interwar social impact and Architecture in Athens2
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 14
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
2. Interwar social impact and Architecture in Athens
As already mentioned in the Introduction, the Interwar years, 1919‐1940, were
characterized by instability and continuous political and social movements. The
purpose of this chapter is to trace an outline of how these continuous changes
influenced social conditions in Greece and interfered with the new architectural
profile of the city. Social position was decisive in determining the choice
between the different architectural styles and only when the background of
these choices is comprehended could one focus on the subject of floor finishes in
these buildings and understand their social reflection.
2.1 Interwar new social conditions in Greece
It would be impossible to understand the social conditions of the Greek capital
during those years without briefly mentioning the results of the different wars
the country had gone through. The Interwar period for the rest of Europe
corresponded with the starting point of years of peace. The case for Greece was
quite different.
Greece, at the end of the First World War, differently from the rest of Europe,
was coming out of a total of 8 years of continuous wars, as before World War I
the country had been entangled in the first and second Balkan Wars. Contrary to
the European state for peace, Greece in 1919 continued launched at war since it
began the campaign in Asia Minor. That campaign, as Vournas (1997, 211)
explains, was veiled behind imperialistic motives, a dream of recreating the
Byzantine Empire. The conclusion was written three years later, in 1922, by the
Asia Minor catastrophe, where thousands of people were killed, and the
survivors became refugees on the Greek territory.
This dramatic conclusion marked the belated beginning of the Interwar period
for Greece. The decades spent in wars and the Asia Minor catastrophe, as
Veremis (2008, 45) explains, assigned huge economical and social problems to
the country. Defeated were actually the politics of war, as defined by Ladogianni
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 15
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
(1989, 8) and the beginning of that era was marked by the need for
reconstruction and modernization of the country.
2.1.1 Emigration
During the 1922 Asia Minor catastrophe, as Kaplan reports (2002, 442), in less
than 10 days more than one million refugees, mostly women and orphans, moved
from the Turkish territory to Greece (fig 2.1). This fact was followed by the
definitely largest population exchange in history between Greeks and Turks,
decided upon by the Treaty of Sevres (Veremis 2008; John 2007).
Kaplan (2002, 442) estimates that emigrates instantly augmented the population
of Greece by almost 20% and particularly that of Athens by three times. Therefore
the first case to be resolved was the housing problem of these people, followed
by their social integration.
2.1.2 Economy
The beginning of the Interwar found Greece in a terribly unstable economic
situation, with huge debts to foreign countries. Within the general effort for
recovery and modernization of the country and its economy, the continuously
alternating governments tried to create an independent economy of internal
market.
To achieve this, the creation and development of industries near the big cities
was encouraged (fig. 2.2). There is a strict correlation between the
overpopulation factor and industrialization with two sides. First of all, as Clogg
(2002, 129) notes, the large number of unemployed refugees offered cheap
craftsmanship making for a fast development of the newborn industry. At the
Fig. 2.1 Thousands of
refugees waiting to embark for Greece during
the Smyrni catastrophe,
1922 Source: Veremis
(2008, 184)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 16
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
same time some of the refugees managed to bring in some kind of capital and,
most important, their enterprising spirit (Demathas 2005; Veremis 2008). These
two complementary factors gave a tremendous boost to the suffering economy.
Once the country’s economy started healing, the state, apart from sustaining
industry, made tremendous efforts to ensure economic stability. Raptis (1997,
304) explains that the nucleus for stability was searched for in increasing internal
production with the continuous realization of large public works (fig. 2.3, 2.4).
Through these actions, the economy of Greece managed to survive during the
Interwar years and to even balance the dramatic consequences of the Great
Crash of 1929. All the activities of those years marked the birth of the
contemporary capitalistic economy of the country creating a new equilibrium
between the various social classes.
Fig. 2.3 Large public works: The creation of a staircase on Marasli street, Kolonaki Source: Arseni, K (2004, 168)
Fig. 2.4 Steps on Marasli street‐ works
completed, Kolonaki
Source: Arseni, K
(2004, 169)
Fig. 2.2 Women
workers in textile
industry Source:
www.fhw.gr , © E.L.I.A
photo archives
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 17
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
2.1.3 Social balances
Big cities, including Athens, were now the center of a multicultural concentration
of populations of different backgrounds, which led to the change of ethics and
balances. This gave fertile ground for innovation in manners and customs,
bringing about shocking reactions to the existing consolidated social balances.
Because of this economic growth the Interwar period, as Mantouvalou (2005,
86) explains, became the triumph of the middle class, which was from then on
mainly divided into commercial and industrial. Yet, at the same time, as
Ladogianni (1989, 86) underlines, due to the fact that the financial boom was
based on the exploitation of cheap craftsmanship a huge class discrimination had
begun.
The various governments, wishing to soften these social unbalances, tried to
promote a series of social measures. The most significant one was once again
related to the growth of population and the consequent growth of
analphabetism. As Raptis (2007, 109) explains, the big educational reform was
made between 1929 and 1932, the first complete one for contemporary Greece.
These measures were necessary for the reconstruction and modernization of the
society, a mutating society of a city moving on with fast rhythms of urbanization.
2.2 Urbanization of Athens
Vasenhofen (2000, unpublished) clarifies that what is intended as urbanization
internationally goes together with the transition of Economy from agricultural to
industrial and later to the economy of services. In the case of Greece, and
particularly the city of Athens, this transition was suddenly accelerated in 1922 by
the arrival of the emigrants of the Asia Minor Catastrophe. Considering that
before 1922 the urban population of the country was only 23 %, the arrival of the
emigrants, out of which 42 % originated from urban areas, created a new urban
profile for the cities (Veremis 2008, 17).
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 18
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
After the initial crisis of overpopulation, this new accelerated urbanization finally
transformed the peasant town of Athens into a metropolis, (Iliopoulos 2000,
306). On the other hand, Biris (2000, 396) notes that the expansion of the city
took place through completely anarchic procedures, creating a chaotic new
urban tissue.
Before analyzing the architectural styles of this transformation phase of Athens,
we need to briefly consider the three main elements that marked this process:
the state measures, the new suburbs and the legislation of horizontal property.
2.2.1 State measures
Even if socially and economically the Interwar was mainly characterized by
private initiatives, the state played a key role, as Galani (1997, 173) underlines,
with public works and measures that modified the profile of the city.
As already mentioned, the main axis of politics in those years was
“modernization” and especially “social regeneration”. Tournikiotis (2000, 447)
further emphasizes that for these purposes large scale programmes and big
important public works were carried out; e.g. creation of new schools (fig. 2.5),
hospitals and institutions of social care.
Fig. 2.5 Example of the big educational reform, New school under
construction Source: Arseni, K (2004, 264)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 19
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
In 1923 the need for housing was the first problem to be resolved; the
governments therefore took a series of measures to facilitate this procedure.
Kosmaki (1991, 207) emphasizes that these measures were consolidated by
decrees and laws relative to: expropriation of buildings and lands; obligatory
extension of leases for professional use properties; creation of social housing
and the creation of private building cooperatives. Some years later, in 1929,
the law for horizontal property was decreed.
These measures brought about the accelerated creation of new suburbs and will
be further analyzed as they were the crucial factor for the urbanization of the
city of Athens.
2.2.2. Modified Center and new suburbs
The refugees filled the city center in a chaotic way, creating, as described by Biris
(1996, 205), huge problems of cleanliness and sanitation (fig. 2.6‐2.7).
Three kinds of development occurred at that time, characterizing the very
distinctive social classes too. In the center of Athens we get two different
phenomena: evaluation and devaluation of zones. Biris (2003, 30) says that, while
the main high class neighborhoods remained in the area surrounding the Royal
Palace transforming it into a modern urban zone, some other zones, especially
around the Museum and Omonoia square, which used to be high class areas,
became mixed commercial/housing zones, downgrading their value.
Fig. 2.7 Temporary refugees ‘tent‐houses’ In Athenia square
Source: Arseni, K (2004, 264)
Fig. 2.6 Children in refugees camps Source:: www.fhw.gr , ©Benaki Museum photo archives
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 20
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
To deal with the quantity of refugees the city had to be expanded. That was
accomplished by creating land for sale out of private properties in the rest of
Attica and facilitated by organizing private cooperatives, as explained by
Giacumacatos (1999, 96) and Kaukala (1999, 188) and slightly criticized by Biris
(2003, 30). We have more than 19 such suburbs, the nucleus of which
concentrated expatriated population; some of them were even named after their
city of origin in Anatolia with the addition of Nέα (new) (e.g. Νέα Σμύρνη ‐New
Smyrna, Νέα Ιωνία – New Ionia).
On the other hand we also have the birth of new high class suburbs, distant from
the center and differentiated from the emigrants suburbs. Kairofillas (1988, 126)
and Biris (2003, 30) explain that the new suburbs occurred both as a response for
a healthy environment and as an aesthetically distinctive answer to the chaotic
situation prevailing in the central areas. Following the European examples of the
“garden‐city” the decrees that founded Psychiko in 1923 and Ekali in 1924
included, as Kaukala(1999, 183) analyzes, an urban plan, guidelines of high
standard building methods and regulations on very restricted commercial
activities (fig. 2.6‐2.7). These two model “garden cities” inspired the genesis of 14
other “rural suburbs” with similar but not so strict regulations.
Fig. 2.9 View of Ekali garden city, 1927 Source: Koumanoudis (2002, 47)
Fig. 2.8 Original plan by Agapitos Ekali garden
city, 1925 Source:
Koumanoudis (2002, 25)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 21
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
2.2.3 Legislation for horizontal property
The final solution to the housing problem, that in any case characterized the
whole Interwar period, was given by Law 3741 of 1929 “for property on storey”.
Its analysis by Zepos (1931, cited by Marmaras (1991, 16)) is:
“As for the legal meaning of the term, property on storey or horizontal property,
defines the ownership of a building by more than one physical persons, where each
of them is in full possession of one storey of that building or just a flat in that
building”
In this manner the state found a legal solution for the creation of multi‐storey
buildings. This law certainly provided a quick solution to the problem of
accommodation but what must be underlined is that at the same time it denoted
the dramatic transformation of the social tissue and habits of the citizens of
Athens. As Constantopoulos (1999, 79) etymologically analyzes excellently, we
have a transition from the Greek word kat‐oikia, meaning “house to dwell” and
representing qualitative values, to dia‐merisma, meaning “sharing part of a
building” with clear quantitative values.
Fig. 2.10 Single family
house, with the
inscription, ‘because of demolition buildings materials for sale’,
1935 Source:
Chatzifotiou (2003, 69)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 22
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
Modernization became for Athens almost a synonym for the multi‐storey
buildings. These began to grow where traditional and popular houses as well as
forests used to stand until then. The regeneration and expansion of the city had
begun with lots of benefits but with some losses too; the annihilation of
traditional architecture and the irresponsible elimination of natural environment
(fig. 2.8 ).
Amidst an uncertain political situation these changes, starting from the new
financial and social balances, brought about the urbanization of the city and
made the Interwar years the era of, the rebirth of a new Greek capital. Finally the
orientation of the crossroad between Orient and Occident turned clearly towards
Europe. All these ideological movements, social debates and evolution are
portrayed in the built environment in different architectural typologies.
2.3 Architectural typologies
The architecture of transition; this is the definition given by Cholevas (1994, 144)
for this architectural period of continuous development. The delayed arrival of
the industrial revolution and the new social and financial situation of the country
created needs for a new architectural language.
In the 1920s Athens slowly started to become more open towards international
architectural trends, a fact that as Vatopoulos (2002, 107) observes, matured in
the 30s giving way to the most creative and experimental decade of
contemporary Greek architecture. The two main characteristics of this
architectural experimentation are for Cholevas (1998, 12) the elimination of
academism and specific architectural rhythms, and the use of new materials as an
expression of the new style of urban life.
The new architectural language was invented in Greece by a generation of new
architects. These new architects as Cholevas (1998, 11) classifies, can be
subdivided into two distinctive categories. Those educated in Constantinople and
the great European Architectural schools of Germany and France, and the first
generation of architects from the Technical University of Athens, in the newborn
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 23
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
Architectural faculty founded only in 1917. Furthermore, as Biris (1996, 292)
observes the various styles invented and followed by architects, have been
copied and repeated by technicians, who offered the various styles in a more
economical way.
Regarding the use of new materials, especially concrete, Vatopoulos (2000, 503)
specifies that although the first concrete building in Athens was constructed in
1907, its extended use occurred only in the Interwar years. Although, as Biris
(1996, 290) explains, this new material was initially used only for finishes, it
passed from floors to walls and to constructions fully made of armed concrete.
Armed concrete, even not yet possessing the quality and technology of the rest
of the European countries, from this point onwards it characterizes Greek
building technology till today (Fessa‐Emmanouil and Marmara 2005, xxvii).
Generally, during the Interwar years the Athenian Built Environment is created in
a wavering climate. There was space and need for architectural experimentation
with various styles, without always keeping a clear distinction between these
different styles. We therefore find works of distinguished architects who either
create in completely different styles during their evolution in time or mix
different styles and influences in one building. Even so, the main styles found in
that period are: neo‐academic, popular, modernist and modern movement
architecture, that we are now going to briefly introduce.
Fig. 2.11 Moment from the
construction of the
building of the Central
Bank of Greece in
armed concrete
Source: Archives of
Bank of Greece ©
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 24
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
2.3.1 Neo‐academism
In order to understand the various architectural styles of the time and their
interaction we have to step back in the architectural history one moment before
the Interwar. From the moment of its foundation, the new free Greek state
based the idea of the National State on the idea of Classicism, expressed in
architecture by the so called Neoclassical style. Therefore, as Vatopoulos (2002,
93) observes, although the Interwar years marked the chronological death of the
Neoclassical style it gave birth to the so called Neo‐academism, drawing on the
idea of the importance of national identity.
Neo‐academism embraces for Giacumacatos (1999, 31) different styles, as
German Classicism, Eclecticism and the Beaux Art tradition. The architects that
followed it, mainly for public buildings in the city center, wanted to create, even
if only in ornamentation, a uniform shape of urban architecture for a Greek
capital worthy of being considered European.
The Neo‐academism used older motives and created, with modern materials,
constructions of a nostalgic aspect. Socially the use of neo‐academism in
architecture has been, through all the Interwar years, related to the conservative
thinking and the opposition to any innovation or change.
Fig. 2.12 Neoacademic building detail Benizelou and Apollonos, City Center Athens Source: Vatopoulos (2002, 97)
Fig. 2.13 Neoacademic building Rural Bank,Stadiou, City Center Athens
Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 25
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
2.3.2 Popular style
Another architectural style, founded earlier due to an article titled “Popular
Architecture” published by Aristoteles Zachos in 1911, found fertile ground for its
development in the Interwar years. As Giacumacatos (2004, 31) underlines, the
text of this article was a courageous act of self consciousness because it
connected the importance of popular tradition to Byzantine culture. The basic
slogan of the popular style movement was “return to the roots” and it
emphasized a strong need for a new real national identity in architecture
(Kolonas 2006; Cholevas1994).
The popular style’s political and social aspect is very significant as it went against
the imposed vision of the country as a projection of its ancient glorious past. The
Byzantine years (those are the Balkan mediaeval years) had a more direct
influence on the habits and costumes of the population, a fact suppressed by the
Central European countries’ view of modern Greece.
Therefore, as highlighted by Fessa‐Emmanouil and Marmara (2005, xxi), after the
humiliation of the Asia Minor catastrophe ‐ also very much blamed on the
betrayal by the great Central European powers ‐ this movement expressed
opposition by returning to the natural roots of popular tradition.
What must be underlined though is that the byzantine and the rich popular
tradition were considered first as an inspiration for the architects of the so called
“popular style” since, as Cholevas (1998, 28) explains, they should create modern
art and architecture, that is, constructions using modern materials and
techniques.
Fig. 2.14
Popular style building detail , A.Chatzimichali
house, City Center, Athens Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 26
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
2.3.3 Modernist
Modernist architecture for Greek constructions of the Interwar represented the
other trend: that of opposition to Neo‐academism. Biris (2003,176) explains how
this movement, mainly followed in the twenties, opposed conservatism by
proposing models that incorporated Art Nouveau and Art Deco elements.
Vatopoulos (2002, 107) explains that Art Nouveau appeared so late in Greece
because it is strictly related to the Industrial Revolution which, as already
mentioned, occurred in this country only after the second Balkan War. Another
social factor that supported the diffusion of Modernist is related once again to
the refugees of Asia Minor, who either as simple people or as specialized
architects were already familiar with and loved the forms of this movement.
Even though the modernist movement imported Art Nouveau in Athens,
Vatopoulos (2000, 504) underlines the obstacle of the craftsmen’s very limited
knowledge of ironwork at that time. Therefore what was actually created in
Interwar Athens were different plain buildings of Art Nouveau aspirations, simply
ornamented with Art Deco elements (fig. 2.15, 2.16).
Fig. 2.15 Modernist building,
Sourri, City Center, Athens
Source: Author
Fig. 2.16 detail of decoration in art deco motive Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 27
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
2.3.4 Modern Movement
Following all this architectural research of the twenties, Athens in the thirties
was ready to embrace and experiment on the Modern Movement. The prevailing
favourable atmosphere is also underlined by the hosting in Athens in 1933 of the
IV CIAM Congress, which for many scholars was the last real conference on
Modern Architecture.
Athens, Tournikiotis (2000, 440) explains, not yet a metropolis, emerged in its
urbanization procedure after studying the European Modern Movement and
expressing it in its own particular language. The Modern Movement’s theories
reflected the will to transform Architecture into a symbol of social, constructive
and aesthetic improvement.
The growth of the Modern Movement in Athens, as in the rest of Europe, came
out as a natural consequence of the diffused use of modern materials, especially
of reinforced concrete. New materials gave new structure solutions and
promoted the vertical development of constructions.
For the State the acceptance of Modern Movement was related to the two
problems previously analyzed, which are, the need for immediate housing of the
refugees and the need for a new social face of the regenerated society. For this
purpose, Tournikiotis (2000, 440) summarizes, Modern architecture was the
solution for the three main state construction programmes; the new school
buildings programme, the hospitals, and the social housing. For all those urgent
needs, that also included limited funds and time problems, the Modern
Movement and particularly the principles of rationalism, gave valuable answers
as per Giacumacatos (2004, 43).
The theories of the Modern Movement in the private sector were warmly
welcomed by the newly formed urban middle class. Those private investors
identified in the Modern Movement, with the modernization of the society and
therefore the evaluation of their importance in the system and the social
balances as Fessa‐Emanouil & Marmara (2005, xxii) analyze.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 28
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
The Modern Movement’s acceptance by the middle class, due to the law for
horizontal property, gave birth to the multi‐storey buildings, from then on the
most common dwelling constructions until today in Athens (2.17). The new multi‐
storey building represented the ideal housing solution, turning into a
Mediterranean version of Bauhaus ornamented with Art Deco elements, a proof
of the non‐exclusive use of architectural styles.
2.4 Conclusion
The different consequences of the various political choices brought a wind of
change in Greece during the Interwar years. The instant overpopulation created a
new social texture that forced the regeneration and modernization of the city.
Almost one hundred years after the foundation of the Greek capital its
urbanization finally came about thanks to these forced changes.
Athens needed a proper architectural language for its new metropolitan aspect.
As a consequence those years allowed various new architects to research into
and promote different architectural styles. Each style, even if not completely
detached from the others, supported and expressed different political and social
tendencies. The so called architecture of transition, incorporating all those styles
Fig. 2.17 Modern
movement multi‐storey
building attached to neoclassical
building, Patssion, City
Center, Athens
Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 29
2. Interwar social im
pact and architecture in Athens
and their intermingling during the most creative and interesting twenty years of
contemporary architecture, left us a with a large amount of examples of
architectural heritage.
Interwar architecture is very significant not only as a pioneering leap in design
but also as a starting point for construction innovations, particularly the
experimentation with new materials. This is when traditional floor finishing
techniques like terrazzo and mosaic evolved according to the new technologies.
And that is why I consider it very important for these floors, often undervalued
and destroyed, to be recognised as unique for this period and conserved.
The conservation of Interwar architecture as a significant mark of the economic
and social evolution of the country, after years of adventures, is lately finding its
way, as will be analyzed thoroughly in chapters 4 and 5.
Before that, examples of the different architectural typologies will be elaborated
in such a way as to analyze the specific use of terrazzo and mosaic floors in
Athenian Interwar architecture. The choice of floors, the social significance and
the issues on their conservation will be analyzed within the framework of some
significant case studies.
Case Studies3
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 30
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case Studies
Initially we have seen what terrazzo and mosaic floors are, their similar
constitution materials and their major differences as to their execution method.
We then moved on to the various architectural expressions of Interwar in Greece
and their different social reflections. At this point we will try to trace a
connection between these data. Is there a crucial connection between the
different architectural types and the choice of a floor finish? And if yes, does it
affect their preservation status?
3.1 Methodology
Unfortunately floor finishes are usually not considered as important architectural
elements. Thus, in the flourishing bibliography on Interwar architecture, I found
only one mention on the use of terrazzo in the urban multi dwelling, by
Papadam‐Riza (2002, 172). For this reason, this part of my research has been
conducted with onsite visits for the collection of data, by observing the building,
the types of floor finishes and their position within the building as well as their
actual preservation status. The buildings that were chosen for observation are
mainly located in the center of Athens but also in some of its suburbs.
A total of 25 buildings were studied but, to keep a balance between the
examples, only 20 are presented in paragraph 3.3, five for each architectural
style. The remaining five, all from the modern movement, are attached in the
appendix as a proof of the abundance of modern movement examples but not
counted in the quantitative data analysis. The observation, and results have been
organized in thematic cards, two for every case: building data and floor data.
3.1.1 Building Data
In each case the first card is an introduction to the building. It includes general
data; name of the building, location, year of construction, architect and listing
number. In case of unknown data, this is marked with a question mark in
parenthesis. These are completed by a short description of the building,
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 31
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
presenting its original and its actual use, a notion on the architectural typology
and the type and location of the floor under observation. To complete the
overview of the building there is a picture of its external view and, where
available, the plans with the location of the floor finishes under observation or, in
some cases, a historical photograph.
3.1.2 Floor Data
The second card relates to the floor under observation. In cases where more
than one area of the same building has been observed there will be will be more
than one floor data card, one for each particular area. These cards contain
specific data on the floor finish, starting with the type ‐ terrazzo, or mosaic ‐
moving on to the main colours and then to some observations, usually regarding
particularities of the case. Finally there are notes on the preservation status and a
short list of the main deterioration forms. In order to better understand the
described fields there is always a picture with a detail of the floor, two or three
others with a general view of its location and finally some particulars of the
floor’s decay.
We are now ready to go through the completed case study cards. Their
comparison will lead us first to paragraph 3.3 with observations on the
relationship between architectural style and the type and location of the floor
finish and to paragraph 3.4 with an overview of the main conservation problems
of mosaics and terrazzo that were found in the case studies of this research.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 32
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3.2 Case studies
3.2.1 Neo‐academic buildings
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 1 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name Giannarou Building
Location Filellinon & Othonos str, Syntagma – City Center
Year 1917 original, burnt, new completed in 1927
Architect First building Giannaros, N. new Metaxas, A.
Listing number 241 α/ 08.05.1991
Short description The neo‐academic building is a seven floor apartment building, originally residences, nowadays used as offices until the 5th floor and residences in the last two. It is one of the first buildings completely made of concrete. At the time of its construction it was highly criticized due to its exaggerated height (Marmaras; 1991, 44). The floors terrazzo floors under observation are in the sixth and seventh storey, as in all the other floors they have been replaced with white marble.
External view
Original view of the building:
c.s.4 original view,
Source: www.eie.gr
c.s.1 detail of neo‐academic decoration Source: Author
c.s.2 View from
Fillelinon & Othonos str,
Source: Author
c.s.3 View during construction, Source: www.eie.gr
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 1 –6th floor Floor D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Red
Observations The terrazzo is still in place at the landing of the staircases, in a very narrow space of the sixth and seventh floor.
Preservation
status
Mediocre Deterioration form: Cracks, Lacunae, Erosion , Stains
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.5 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.6 6th floor Source: author
c.s.7 6th floor Source: author
c.s.8 Filled Lacuna Source: author
c.s.9 Crack Source: author
c.s.10 Deposits/stains Source: author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Case Study 2 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name ‘Sarogleio’ Armed Forces Officers Club
Location Pavlos Melas Square & Rigillis str
Year 1924‐1932
Architect Nikoloudis, N
Listing number Not listed
Short description The neo‐academic building is a two floor building constructed as the Armed Forces Officers club, and is still used as such. All the areas of the building have terrazzo floors, with a clear distinction of simple terrazzo in corridors and offices, and terrazzo with decorative pattern in the main entrance hallway and reception areas. The terrazzo floors under observation are in the ground floor.
External view
Plan:
c.s.12 View from Pavlos Melas square, Source: Author
c.s.11 detail of neo‐academic decoration, Source: Author
c.s.13 Plan; not in scale, north point unknown
Simple terrazzo Terrazzo with decorative
pattern Source: Kotsaki (2005, 143)
Elaboration: Author
The University
Type
Main colou
Observatio
Preservatio
status
General vie
Floor decay
c.s.16 RecSource: A
c.s.19 FilleSource: A
TERRA
y of York – MA
Ter
urs Ora
ons CrevarIn tora
on VerDetCraFewhan
ew
y particulars
ception Hall Author
ed Lacuna Author
AZZO AND MO
in Conservation
rrazzo
ange, black
eation of geriation of terthe corridorsange terrazz
ry good condterioration facks w cracks, nd, for elect
s
c.s.Sou
OSAIC FLOORS
n Studies, 2009
eometrical rrazzo colous and officeso.
dition. forms:
probably crical installa
.17 Main entraurce: Author
c.s.20 Felectrictrace, S
S IN INTERWAR
forms withurs. s simple
created bytions.
ance hallway
Filled Lacuna acal installation Source: Autho
R BUILDINGS IN
Floor deta
h
y c.s.14‐15 TSource: a
c.s.18 LSource
along ns or
N ATHENS: Con
ail
Terrazzo detaauthor
Lateral hall e: Author
nservation Issu
ail,
es
Case Study 2 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 3 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name A.S.O.E.E (University of Economics and Business)
Location Patission 76 str– City Center
Year 1926‐1930
Architect Metaxas, A
Listing number Not listed
Short description This is a neo‐academic building; designed to host the first Economics school, later University and still in use as such. It was internally modified in 1956‐57 and expanded with a new building in 1991. The floors of the main entrance and the corridors of the ground floor are all made in terrazzo.
External view
Original Drawings:
c.s.21 View from Patission str, Source: Author
c.s.22 detail of neo‐academic main
entrance, Source: Author
c.s.23 original
view, Source:
www.eie.gr
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 3 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey, Yellow
Observations Creation of geometrical forms with alternated colors of terrazzo. The floor of the main entrance is grey with big aggregates and black with small aggregates and that of the corridors yellow and black with small aggregates.
Preservation
status
Grey: Mediocre preservation status Deterioration forms: Cracks, Lacunae, Stains,Erosion Yellow: Generally good condition.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.30 Erosion of mortar, Source: author
c.s.24‐25 Terrazzo detail, Source: author
c.s.27 Main entrance hallway, Source: author c.s.26 Corridor, Source: author
c.s.31 Lacuna Source: author
c.s.29 Crack Source: author
c.s.28 Deposits/stains Source: author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Case Study 4 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name GENKA A.E.
Location Kleisthenous 9 str, Omonia – City Center
Year 1921‐1930
Architect Unknown
Listing number 241 α/ 08.05.1991
Short description The neo‐academic building is a four floor apartment building; originally had a shop in the ground floor and residences above; nowadays it still has shops in the ground floor while the other 3 floors, plus mezzanine added later on are used as offices. The terrazzo floors under observation are in the fourth floor.
External view
Original and present plan of the fourth floor:
c.s.35 Plan; not in scale , north point unknown Terrazzo with decorative pattern
Source: Karakostas Elaboration: Author
c.s.32 detail of neo‐academic decoration, Source: Author
c.s.33 View from Kleisthenous str, Source: Author
c.s.34 Original Plan, 1939, not in scale, north point unknown Source: Karakostas
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 4 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey, red, black
Observations Creation of geometrical forms with alternated colors of terrazzo, probably achieved by different grouting.
Preservation
status
Generally good condition. Deterioration forms: Cracks and Lacunae
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.41 Lacunae painted filling, Source: Author
c.s.39 Lacuna from loss of aggregates Source: Author
c.s.36 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.37 4th floor Source: Author
c.s.38 4th floor Source: Author
c.s.40 Crack Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 5 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name Bank of Greece
Location Panepistimiou 21 str – City Center
Year 1933‐38
Architect Laskaris, K., Ppadakis, K., Zouboulidis, N.
Listing number 503 α/ 07.10.1983
Short description The building is the headquarters of the central bank of the country, established in 1927. It is a neo‐academic building with strong neoclassical influences. The main hall has two floor mosaics, inserted in a marble floor, while the corridors of the offices and library in the third storey are terrazzo. The floors under observation here are: the mosaics of the ground floor and the terrazzo of the third floor
External view
Original view of the Building
c.s.42View from Panepistimiou str,
Source: Author
c.s.43 detail of neo‐academic main entrance, Source: Author
c.s.44 original
view, Source:
www.eie.gr
The University
Type
Main colou
Observatio
Preservatio
status
General vie
Floor decay
c.s.46 MoSource: B
c.s.48 LacuSource: Ba
TERRA
y of York – MA
Mo
urs Yelvitr
ons ThemasymrooideVen
on MeDetero
ew
y particulars
osaic I, Bank of Greec
una ank of Greece
AZZO AND MO
in Conservation
osaic
low, red, breous tesserere are two in transactiommetrically iom. There is ntifies themnice, in the Gediocre. terioration fosion.
s
ce
e cS
OSAIC FLOORS
n Studies, 2009
blue green rae. mosaic paneon hall, locat in the two si an inscriptio
m as manufac Gianese labo
form: Lacuna
c.s.49 Crack Source: Bank
S IN INTERWAR
varieties of
els in the ted ides of the on that ctured in oratory.
ae, cracks,
c.s.47 MSource:
of Greece
R BUILDINGS IN
Floor deta
f
c.s.45 MoSource: B
osaic II, Bank of Gree
c.s.50Sourc
N ATHENS: Con
ail
osaic detail, Bank of Greec
ce
0 Erosion ce: Bank of Gr
nservation Issu
ce
reece
es
Case Study 5a Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 5b –Third floor Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey
Observations All the corridors of the third floor leading to offices and the library of the bank are made in grey terrazzo, surrounded by white marble.
Preservation
status
Generally good condition. Deterioration forms: Deposits, Notches
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.51 Terrazzo detail, Source: author
c.s.52 Corridor, third floor, Source: author
c.s.54 Corridor, third floor, Source: author
c.s.53 Entrance of library, third floor, Source: author
c.s.56 Superficial Erosion, Source: author
c.s.55 Notches, Source: author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 33
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3.2 Case studies
3.2.2 Popular style buildings
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Case Study 6 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies
Name Angeliki Chatzimichali’s House
Location A. Chatzimichali 18str, Plaka – City Center
Year 1924‐30
Architect A.Zachos
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building is one of the most characteristic examples of popular architecture; originally a residence, nowadays the Museum of Folk Art. The apartments have wooden floors except for the balconies and the service rooms (kitchen, floor and servants’ rooms) that have terrazzo. The terrazzo floors under observation are in the main floor, in the service areas, and outside in the garden staircase.
External view
Plans:
c.s.57 detail of popular style decoration Source: Author
c.s.58 View from Chatzimichali str, Source: Author
c.s.13 59‐60 Plan, Ground and first floor; not in scale, north point unknown Simple terrazzo (in) Terrazzo with decorative pattern (out) Source: Fessa‐Emanouil, Marmaras (2005, 22), Elaboration: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Case Study 6 Floor Data
I. Introduction
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Red, service rooms Grey, out
Observations Use of terrazzo in kitchen, corridor, bathroom and secondary entrance.
Preservation
status
Deterioration forms: Service areas: good condition, only some Cracks and Lacunae. Open air: very poor condition: cracks lacunae and biological attack
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s. 61 ‐ 62 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.63 Corridor Source: Author
c.s.64 Kitchen Source: Author
c.s.65 Secondary entrance Source: Author
c.s. 66 Erosion Source: Author
c.s. 67 Crack Source: Author
c.s.68 biological attack Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Case Study 7 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies
Name Byzantine Museum (ex‐Villa Illissia)
Location Vas. Sofias 22, City center
Year Orginal building 1840, renovation 1926‐1930
Architect Original Building Kleantis, renovation Zachos, A
Listing number 74280/4154 α/ 21.06.1993
Short description The building was originally the residence of the Duchesse de Plaisance; afterwards army barracks. In the Interwar years, after renovation, the main building became the first national Byzantine and Christian Museum. Zachos created on the ground floor two rooms imitating the inside of byzantine churches. All the rooms are terrazzo floored, in some cases alternating with white marble. Until 2004 it hosted the permanent exhibition of the Museum, and is now temporary hosting the offices of the museum. In the future the ground floor will become the Main Entrance, with the ticket office, while the first floor will become an area of temporary exhibitions.
External view
Plans:
c.s.69 Central
entrance, Source: Author
c.s.70‐71‐ Plan: Ground and first floor; not in scale, north point unknown Simple terrazzo Terrazzo with decorative pattern Restoration intervention with terrazzo Source: Byzantine and Christian Museum Elaboration: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Case Study 7 Floor Data
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey, Red, Black mortar with small medium and large white aggregates.
Observations Terrazzo floors creating decorative forms by variations of terrazzo colours and/or insertion of white marbles. Extremely interesting is the use of this technique for integration of an ancient tarsia floor element.
Preservation
status
Deterioration forms: Inner : Heavy erosion located in black mortar, stains, notches Balcony: Grouting erosion and few lacunae
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.76 Ground floor Source: Author
c.s.75 Corridor, 1st floor Source: Author
c.s. 72‐73‐74 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.77 Ground floor Source: Author
c.s. 78 Erosion Source: Author
c.s. 79 Notching Source: Author
c.s. 78 Lacuna Source: Author
c.s. 78 Grouting erosion Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Case Study 8 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies
Name D. Loverdou Museum (ex‐Ziller house)
Location Mavromihali 6str, Exarheia City‐Center
Year Orginal building 1882, renovation 1930
Architect Original Building Ziller, E renovation Zachos, A
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building was originally the residence of the German architect Ziller. In the Interwar years it was bought by the banker Loverdos, who commissioned Zachos with the renovation and extension of the building, turning part of its garden and the old storerooms in a Byzantine Museum. These rooms were mosaic floored. Later it was used as storage room for the costumes of the National Opera, at which time it caught fire. Presently it belongs to the Byzantine and Christian Museum, which is scheduling its restoration.
External view
Plans:
c.s.84 Orginal plan by Ziller, when the areas under
observation still storerooms and garden;
not in scale with unknown north point
Mosaics Source: Benaki Museum ©
c.s.82‐83 Details of the Entrances Source: Byzantine and Christian Museum
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Case Study 8 Floor Data
3. Case studies
Type Mosaic Floor detail
Main colours Yellow, red, grey, black, blue
Observations Mosaic floors made of porcelain tile tesserae, imitating common mosaic motives of early‐byzantine churches.
Preservation
status
Deterioration forms: Very good conservation of the floors. Main deteriorations due to external factors: fire, stains, cements deposits. Lacunae: only few on the boarders.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.88 Main entrance hallway Source: Author
c.s.87 ‘Chapel’ Source: Author
c.s. 91 Concrete deposit Source: Author
c.s. 90 Lacunae Source: Author
c.s. 92 Stain Source: Author
c.s. 93 Fire Stain Source: Author
c.s.85‐86 Mosaic detail, Source: Author
c.s.89 Main entrance hallway, while Museum still in use, Source: www.iranon.gr
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 9 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name Moralis house
Location Yasemion 8 str, Psychico (garden city‐ suburb)
Year 1932
Architect (?)
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building is an example architecture inspired by popular style in one of the garden‐city suburbs created in the Interwar. Originally a residence, extended in the 60s and nowadays still used as such. The original building had wooden floors in the bedrooms and reception room, while the main entrance and the bathroom are terrazzo floored. The floor under observation is in the main entrance.
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s.95 View from
Yasemion str, Source: Author
c.s.94 Detail of popular style decoration, Source: Author
The University
Type
Main colou
Observatio
Preservatio
status
General vie
Floor decay
c.s.97 MaSource: A
c.s.99 ErSource: A
TERRA
y of York – MA
Ter
urs Gre
ons Terby vIn tand
on excDetOn
ew
y particulars
ain Entrance Author
rosion Author
AZZO AND MO
in Conservation
rrazzo
ey and black
rrazzo with variations of the grey terrd black largecellent condterioration fly few surfac
s
OSAIC FLOORS
n Studies, 2009
k
decorative lf terrazzo corazzo use ofe size aggregition forms: ce erosion
S IN INTERWAR
line createdolours. f both whitegates.
c.sSo
R BUILDINGS IN
Floor deta
d
e
c.s.96 teSource: A
s.98 Main Enturce: Author
N ATHENS: Con
ail
errazzo detail Author
trance
nservation Issu
,
es
3. Case studies
Case Study 9 Floor Data
3. Case studies
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 10 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name Malliaris house
Location Thrasyvoulou 14str, Chalandri (rural suburb)
Year 1939
Architect (?)
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building is an example architecture inspired by popular style in one of the rural suburbs created in the Interwar. Originally a residence, extended in the 1981 and nowadays still used as such. The original building had wooden floors only in the bedrooms and reception room, while main kitchen and bathroom had simple terrazzo, destroyed for the extension. Terrazzo with simple geometrical patterns are found in the main hall and the corridor and also in the open air areas: the street entrance and the veranda.
External view
Plans:
c.s.100 Detail of popular style decoration, Source: Author
c.s.101 View from
Thrasyvoulou str, Source:
Author
c.s.102 Original plan of the house, 1939;
not in scale, north point unknown
Demolished part Terrazzo with decorative
pattern (in) Simple terrazzo
Terrazzo with decorative pattern (out)
Source: Malliaris Elaboration: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Case Study 10 Floor Data
I. Introduction
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Red, Orange, Black , hall Yellow, Black, Grey: open air
Observations Terrazzo with decorative patterns in the main hall and main corridor made by variations of terrazzo colours.
Preservation
status
Deterioration forms: In: excellent condition Open air: Few lacunae and a big crack in the central panel due to the weight of the tracks that passed for the renovation in 1981.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.103‐104‐105 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.106 Street Entrance Source: Author
c.s.107 Main Entrance Source: Author
c.s.108 Main Entrance Source: Author
c.s.109 Crack Source: Author
c.s.110 Main Entrance Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 34
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3.2 Case studies
3.2.3 Modernist buildings
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 11 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name Army Share Fund Building
Location Stadiou & Amerikis & Panepistimiou & Voukourestiou, Syntagma str– City Center
Year 1928‐1940
Architect Bonis, L. & Kassandris, V.
Listing number 464 α/ 31.08.1981
Short description This complex is a modernist five storey building; originally used as offices in the floors, entertainment areas with theater on one side and stores and restaurants in the ground floor. It has been restored in year 2007 creating a new shopping center ‘Attika’ and restoring the theater and eating areas. The floors under observation are: some in the landing of the staircases in the main building, nowadays a shopping center; some in the Cafes ‘Zonar’s’ and “Brazilian” (today ‘Clemente’) of the Ground Floor; and some in the foyer of ‘Pallas’ theatre
External view
Original Drawings:
c.s.111 Detail modernist decoration, Source: Author
c.s.112 View from
Stadiou str, Source:
c.s.113 First prize
winning drawings,
1926 Source: Fessa
Emmanouil , Maramaras (2005, 203)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 11b –Zonar’s cafe Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo and Marble Floor detail
Main colours White, Pink
Observations There are two parts of the cafeteria where the terrazzo floor decoration has been maintained; the main entrance and the surrounding area of the elevated level. In both cases pink and white terrazzo quadrants and triangles, alternate with white marble form geometric designs.
Preservation
status
Excellent, no visible form of decay
General view
Floor decay particulars
No visible decay
c.s.119‐120 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.120‐121 ‘Zonars cafe’ main entrance and central hall, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 11c –Brazilian cafe Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Red and black
Observations In the central corridor of the cafeteria the original floor has been maintained. It is a terrazzo with the logo and a decoration made by black terrazzo.
Preservation
status
Good Forms of deterioration: One long crack, deposits and some lacunae
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.123 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.124 Terrazzo with original logo, Source: Author
c.s.125 View of Café’s
outdoor gallery, Source: Author
c.s.127 Crack, Source: Author
c.s.126 Surface Erosion, Source: Author
The University
Type
Main colou
Observatio
Preservatio
status
General vie
Floor decay
c.s.132 ExSource: A
TERRA
y of York – MA
Ter
urs Yel
ons In flooyellgeoIn tfloopormo
on GooForSta
ew
y particulars
xfoliation, Author
AZZO AND MO
in Conservation
rrazzo
low, black, r
the entranor), mosaic olow porcelometrical pa the entranceor), same partion of yelloosaic. od rms of deterains and som
s
OSAIC FLOORS
n Studies, 2009
red, purple,
ce of the of purple, reain tesseraatterns. e of the foyeattern plus aow and black
rioration: me exfoliatio
c.s.124 Foyer EntranceSource: Author
c.The
entraSoAu
S IN INTERWAR
pink, white
theater (1st
ed, pink andae forming
er (2nd a smaller k meanders
n
c.s.13Sour
e,
.s.124 eatre ance, ource: uthor
R BUILDINGS IN
Floor deta
t d g
33 Erosion ofrce: Author
c.s.124 MSource:
N ATHENS: Con
ail
f glazing and s
Mosaic Deata Author
nservation Issu
stains,
il,
es
Case Study 11d –Pallas theatre Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 12 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name Athens 26th High School
Location Souidias and Marasli str , Kolonaki – City Center
Year 1929
Architect Mitsakis, N. in collaboration with arch. Antoniadis, A.
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building was constructed as part of the new school programme, and was the Girls High School “Aristotelis”. Presently still used as a school building. It is a modern movement building combined with classical decorative elements. It was altered in 1958 by the addition of one more storey. All the floors are made of colored terrazzo which creates geometric patterns.
External view
Original view of the Building
c.s.135 View from
Souidias str, Source: Author
c.s.136 original
view, Source:
www.eie.gr
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 12 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey, red, yellow
Observations Creation of geometrical forms by variation of terrazzo colours, probably achieved by different grouting in corridors and main halls while monochrome grey terrazzo in the classrooms.
Preservation
status
Deterioration forms: Grouting erosion, Few Cracks and Lacunae
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.136 Terrazzo detail Source: Author
c.s.139 Surface Erosion, Source: Author
c.s.140 Filled lacunae, Source: Author
c.s.141 Crack, Source: Author
c.s.137 Main entrance Hall, Source: Author
c.s.138 Corridor, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 13 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name ‐
Location D. Areopagitou 17 str, Makrygianni – City Center
Year 1930
Architect Kouremenos, V.
Listing number 405 α/ 09.08.1978
Short description The building is a modernist four‐storey apartment building, originally residences, nowadays still used as such. It is considered as the most characteristic example of art‐deco building in Interwar Athens. Unfortunately today a case is pending for its demolition for the sake of the New Museums of Acropolis cafeteria view. The terrazzo floor under observation is in an apartment of the third floor.
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s.143 View from
Areopagitou str
Source: Flenga‐
Kouremenou (phot.
Nikolaidou)
c.s.144 main entrance, art deco detail Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 13 –Third floor Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Main Hall: Yellow, green, red Corridor: Grey Balconies: grey‐red
Observations Terrazzo with decorative patterns in the entrance and main hall.
Preservation
status
Internal very good condition. Deterioration forms: External: mediocre condition Elevated erosion
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.144‐145‐146 Terrazzo detail Source: Author
c.s.147 balcony, Source: Author
c.s.148 main entrance Source: Author
c.s.149 main entrance Source: Author
c.s.150 Surface erosion Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 14 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name ‐
Location Vas. Sofias 57 str, Kolonaki – City Center
Year 1928
Architect (?) Prezanis, F. or Kriezis, K. or Kitsikis, K.
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building is a modernist five‐storey apartment building, originally residences, nowadays offices. The floor under observation is in the building’s entrance; no entry to the apartments was possible. The main entrance is covered by grey terrazzo.
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s.152 View
from vas. Sofias,
str Source: Author
c.s.151 main entrance art deco detail Source: Vatopoulos (2002, 117)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 14 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey
Observations Use of terrazzo in the main entrance’s floor.
Preservation
status
Very good condition, only some erosion and lacunae in the proximities to the marble.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.154 main entrance Source: Author
c.s.155 main
entrance Source: Author
c.s.153 terrazzo detail Source: Author
c.s.156 lacuna Source: Author
c.s.157 surface erosion Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 15 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name ‐
Location Skoufa 59 str, Kolonaki – City Center
Year 1929‐1930
Architect Kitsikis, K.
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building is a modernist four‐storey apartment building, originally residences, nowadays offices. The floor under observation is in the building’s entrance; no entry to the apartments was possible. In contrast to the white marbled entrance, the corridor that leads to the back is terrazzo floored and was probably the service entrance.
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s.158 view from Skoufa str,
Source: Author
c.s.159 detail of modernist entrance, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 1 5 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey
Observations Use of terrazzo in the secondary entrance’s floor.
Preservation
status
Very good condition, only some black signs probably residues of previously glued carpet (fig).
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.160 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.161 secondary entrance, Source: Author
c.s. 162 secondary entrance, Source: Author
c.s.163 stains, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 35
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3.2 Case studies
3.2.3 Modern Movement Buildings
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 16 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name ‐
Location Solonos 74str, Kolonaki/Exarcheia – City Center
Year 1934
Architect Unknown
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building is a modern movement three‐storey apartment building, originally residences, nowadays offices. The floors under observation are: some in the ground floor and some in an apartment of the second floor. The apartments have wooden floors except for the balconies and the service rooms (kitchen, floor and servants’ rooms) that have terrazzo.
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s.164 View from Solonos str
Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 16a – Ground floor Floor D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey, balconies and service rooms
Observations Use of terrazzo in usage areas.
Preservation
status
Balcony: excellent status but dirty. Service areas: good condition, only some Cracks and small Lacunae.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.165 Terrazzo detail Source: Author
c.s.168 cracks, Source: Author
c.s.169 deposits/stains, Source: Author
c.s.166 Kitchen, Source: Author
c.s.167 Kitchen, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 16b – 1 st floor Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey, balconies Yellow, service rooms
Observations Use of terrazzo in usage areas.
Preservation
status
Balcony: excellent status but dirty. Service areas: good condition, only some Cracks and Lacunae mainly in the kitchen near the sink . The bathroom floor has been covered with modern tiles.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.176 Bathroom covered with new tiles Source: Author
c.s.175 Kitchen Source: Author
c.s.174 Kitchen Source: Author
c.s.171 Terrazzo detail Source: Author
c.s.172 Kitchen Source: Author
c.s.173 Balcony Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 1 7 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name Dance Academy
Location Omirou 55 Kolonaki – City Center
Year 1934
Architect Kontoleon, G.
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building is a modern movement building, originally school and residence, nowadays used as the National Dance Academy. The classrooms have wooden floors. Corridors, service areas and landing of the staircases are made in terrazzo.
External view
Original view and Plan:
c.s.178 View from Omirou,
Source: Author
c.s.177 original view, Source: Fessa Emanouil , Marmaras(2005, 189)
c.s.179 original 3D Model, Source: Fessa Emanouil , Marmaras(2005, 189)
c.s.180 Plan; not in scale, north point unknown Simple terrazzo Source: idem
Elaboration: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 17 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey
Observations The terrazzo is still in place on the corridors at the landing of the staircases, and all the service areas.
Preservation
status
Except from the entrance corridor, heavily decayed, some deterioration is present in the humid areas of kitchen and bathroom, mainly near edges and bathtubs. Deterioration form: Cracks, Lacunae, Stains
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.181 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.182 Main Entrance, Source: Author
c.s.183 Staircases landing, Source: Author
c.s.184 Bathrooms, Source: Author
c.s.185 Erosion, Source: Author
c.s.186 Stains, Source: Author
c.s.187 Cracks, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 18 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name ‐
Location Orestou 20 str, Petralona – City Center
Year 1936
Architect (?)
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building was a modern movement two storey residence house, and is still used as such. The terrazzo floors under observation are in ground floor of the original building in all the rooms, apart from the bathroom that has been covered with tiles and from one room covered with laminated wood. There is also a small part in the beginning of the staircase, all the rest of the yard has been covered with tiles.
External view
Plans:
c.s.189 View from Orestou str,
Source: Author
c.s.190 Plan, not in scale, north point
unknown Terrazzo
Source: Tzartzanis, N
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 1 8 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Green, Yellow Red Green with large white marbles
Observations All the rooms were floored n terrazzo, each one in a different color.
Preservation
status
Good condition. Deterioration forms only in the kitchen: Lacunae
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.20191‐192‐193‐194 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.195 Bedroom, Source: Author
c.s. 196Main hall, Source: Author
c.s.197 Courtyard, Source: Author
c.s.198 Lacunae, Source: Author
c.s.199 filled lacunae, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 19 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name Agios Savvas – Greek Anticancer Institute
Location Alexandras av 171. Ambelokipi – City Center
Year 1936
Architect Tsagris, B
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building was constructed as the first hospital in Greece dedicated to cancer treatments and is still used for the same purpose. It is a modern movement building It has received various extension and modernization of its structure in 1942, 1960, 1979 and 1980‐89 . Probably all its floors were in terrazzo, but many of them are today covered with plastic tiles.
External view
Original view of the Building
c.s.200 View from
Alexandras str, Source: Author
c.s.201 Original view , Source: http://www.agsavvas‐hosp.gr
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 19 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Green, yellow Grey
Observations Entrance: Creation of geometrical forms with alternated colors of terrazzo Corridors: Simple grey terrazzo
Preservation
status
Generally good condition. Deterioration forms: Erosion, Cracks and Lacunae
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.202‐203 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s.206 Aggregates erosion lacunae, Source: Author
c.s.207 Cracks, Source: Author
c.s.204 Corridor, Source: Author
c.s.205 Main Entrance,
Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 20 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies 3. C
ase studies
Name Georgiadis house
Location Agiou Andrea 3 str, N. Smyrni ( refugee suburb)
Year 1938
Architect (?)
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building was a modern movement one storey refuge house. Later one more floor was added on top of the original building. The terrazzo floors under observation are in the original building of the ground floor in all the rooms, apart from bedrooms.
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s.208 View from Agiou Andrea str;
original house Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 20 Floor Data
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Green, entrance Yellow, main Hall and corridor Light Green, Kitchen and balcony Red, kitchen service entrance
Observations Terrazzo in all the rooms, part of the bedrooms, and the external spaces.
Preservation
status
Mediocre condition. Deterioration forms: Lacunae mainly found in the open areas green terrazzo and the internal green and red terrazzo.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.217 Morta erosion lacunae, Source: Author
c.s.218 Aggregates erosion lacunae, Source: Author
c.s.219 Aggregates erosion lacunae, Source: Author
c.s.216 Aggregates erosion lacunae, Source: Author
c.s 209,210,211, 212 Terrazzo detail, Source: Author
c.s. 213 Main Entrance, Source: Author
c.s. 214 Main Hall, Source: Author
c.s.215 Balcony Source: Author
The University
3.3 Type o
The 20 ca
Interwar b
was wide
this resea
Patterns,
There is s
different
ignored b
distinctive
and mode
this poin
architectu
made.
Fig. 3.1repres
of percefl
exampler
Sourc
Fig. 3.2 Grepresen
of percentafloo
examples research reto archite
Source: A
TERRA
y of York – MA
of Architec
ase studies
buildings o
espread (fig
arch into a
Mosaics.
some indica
architectu
by the mod
e predomin
ernist build
t more sp
ural style,
1 Graphic entation ntage of oor type es in this research ce: Author
raphic ntation age of or type in this elating ectural
style Author
AZZO AND MO
in Conservation
cture and c
s demonst
of Athens w
g. 3.1). The
a new divi
ative data
ral styles o
dern move
nance of te
ings. The o
pecific obs
location in
00,5
11,52
2,53
3,54
4,55
OSAIC FLOORS
n Studies, 2009
choice of f
trated that
was very lim
compariso
ision: simp
as to the
of the Ιnte
ment. Terr
errazzo wit
opposite oc
ervations
n the build
42%
Fl
S IN INTERWAR
floor finish
t the use o
mited where
on of these
ple Terrazz
use of thes
erwar (fig.3
razzo was
th decorat
curs in mod
related to
ding and s
10%
48%
loor fin
R BUILDINGS IN
h
of mosaic
eas the use
e results le
o, Terrazz
se three flo
3.2). Mosai
used by al
ive pattern
dern movem
choice of
symbolic si
ishes
N ATHENS: Con
floor finish
e of terrazz
ads the su
o with de
oor finishe
ic was com
l styles yet
ns in popu
ment build
f floor fin
ignificance
Mosaic
Terrazz
Terrazzdec.pat
Mosaic
Terrazzo
Terrazzodec.patt
nservation Issu
3
h in the
zo floors
bject of
corative
es in the
mpletely
t with a
lar style
ings. At
ish and
will be
o
o with ttern
o
o with tern
es
36
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 37
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3.3.1 Simple Terrazzo
Simple or monochrome terrazzo was met in fourteen of the case studies,
demonstrating the extended use of this technique in a large variety of mortar
and aggregates, color and granular size, in all four architectural styles (fig. 3.3).
Yet, the choice of location for these floors within a building is directly affected by
the social reflection of the building itself, in other words whether it was a poor or
a prestigious construction.
In the case of poor constructions, mainly the houses of refugees, terrazzo was
used in all the areas of the house and the courtyard, varying in colors and
aggregates so as to define the different rooms (case studies 17, 19 and appendix).
Terrazzo floors offered hygienic ambient in very modest prices and the possibility
of a primary decoration.
On the other hand, in the urban constructions of the center and some public
buildings we find terrazzo mostly in the secondary and/or service areas: kitchen,
bathrooms, corridors, servant rooms, balconies and auxiliary entrances (case
studies 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 1415a‐b). The rest of the house was covered with the
more prestigious and expensive wooden floors. In these cases, particularly in the
housing case, there is an even clearer social discrimination. The newborn urban
class wished to diverge from the houses of the poor but, as terrazzo was needed
for its high resistance and its hygienic qualities, it was only used wherever
necessary, meaning in the secondary and the utility zones.
Fig. 3.3 Typical simple grey
terrazzo Source: Author
Fig. 3.4 Distinction between usage and prestigious areas Urban modern movement apartment Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 38
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3.3.2 Terrazzo with decorative patterns
Terrazzo with decorative patterns can be classified as an intermediate solution
between Mosaics and simple Terrazzo. The reason is that these terrazzo types
proposed decorative motives of ancient mosaics but with terrazzo technique,
either by altering terrazzo colours or by inserting marble pieces geometrically
distributed (fig. 3.5). They are located in important parts of the buildings, such as
entrances, main halls, main corridors etc., a fact which demonstrates that were
made so as to attract attention.
This shows that architects of the time found a strong ally in concrete terrazzo.
They could create resisting floors compatible with the concrete structure of the
building, at the same time ornamenting the floors thus adding decorative value
to their building.
Twelve examples of such terrazzo were found in all architectural types. Though
expressed in different architectural languages all the buildings that have terrazzo
with decorative patterns were initially designed for the newborn urban class
housing (case studies 4, 9, 10, 11) or for significant public buildings (case studies 2,
3, 7, 11a‐b‐c, 12, 18) Therefore, we have again a symbolic distinction; applying a
technique used by the lower classes but in a more prestigious manner.
Fig. 3.5 Terrazzo with decorative pattern, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 39
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Before moving on to mosaics special mention should be made to two more facts
about terrazzo. First, the extended use of terrazzo in public buildings, like
hospitals, schools, and universities, either simple or with decorative patterns,
which demonstrates that architects of the time found a very cheap and resistant
solution for large areas harmoniously integrating with all the different
architectural languages (fig. 3.6). Second, the diffused use of terrazzo in the
entrance halls of multi‐storey buildings, an important area of these
constructions, as explained by Moiras (2001, 43). This is even more widespread in
the modern movement as demonstrated in case studies 21, 23, 24, (appendix I)
and the 24 photo examples (appendix II) of terrazzo floored entrances from the
ongoing research of ‘Elliniki Etairia’ (fig. 3.7). This latter research includes a
section on entrances with 157 photographs, and the 24 selected for the present
study are 15% of the total. I believe that these data indicate that terrazzo was
particularly appreciated by architects of the experimental modern movement
and should be considered an inseparable element of that architectural language
of the Interwar.
Fig. 3.7 Landing of staircases in public school, Kolonaki, City Center , Athens Source: Author
Fig. 3.8 Entrance in Modern movement building, City Center , Athens Source: Elliniki Etairia (unpublished)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 40
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3.3.3 Mosaic
Of the 20 buildings included in the case studies chapter only three contained
mosaics floor (fig. 3.9). A fourth example was mentioned (architect Efi Kalliga,
pers. comm. January 2009) the Kanellopoulos villa, with a courtyard full of
mosaics; an edifice which has unfortunately been demolished. Apart from the
very limited use what is also very significant is the kind of buildings these floors
were found in.
The building of the Bank of Greece, a Museum, the biggest at the time Theatre of
the Balkans and a rich private Villa give proof that mosaics were very expensive
at that time too. All these buildings were exclusive constructions and were some
of the few the owners which could afford such a luxury in a very tight economic
period for the country. This again has a strong symbolic value, as it distinguishes
those that had the power to significantly differ from decorative elements used
by common people.
Fig. 3.9 Detail of Mosaic floor, Loverdos Museum, City Center, Athens Source: Author
The University
Summing
mainly of
that arch
technique
floor finis
value. Thi
where th
important
seen only
examine n
relationsh
TERRA
y of York – MA
up, we ha
f terrazzo a
itectural st
es. What is
h, was its t
is symbolism
he mosaics
t hall of th
y by employ
now is how
hip betwee
AZZO AND MO
in Conservation
ve seen th
and some o
tyles of the
more signi
ype and loc
m can be s
imported
he building
yees, has si
w do these
n type, loca
M
OSAIC FLOORS
n Studies, 2009
at in all arc
of mosaics
e time wer
ficant than
cation in th
summarized
from Italy
while the
mple terraz
varieties of
ation and p
Fig. 3.11 Mosaic floor,
ain hall, Bank of Greece Center Source: Author
S IN INTERWAR
chitectural
s can be fo
re interacti
n the archite
he buildings
d in the exa
y are locat
third floor
zzo floors (
f pavement
preservation
FigMofloMaBaGreCeSouAut
R BUILDINGS IN
styles of th
ound. This
ng and so
ectural styl
s, reflecting
ample of th
ted in the
r, which w
(fig. 3.10, 3.
ts weather
n status.
g. 3.10 osaic or, ain hall, nk of eece nter urce: thor
N ATHENS: Con
hat time ex
proves onc
were the
le for the c
g a strong s
he Bank of
central an
as designe
.11). What w
r and if ther
nservation Issu
4
xamples
ce more
flooring
hoice of
symbolic
Greece,
nd most
ed to be
we must
re is any
es
41
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 42
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
3.4 Choice of floor finish and preservation status
All the floor finishes observed are manufactures that have undergone over seven
decades of use. As already introduced by the case study cards, they have
suffered different decay forms. The main deterioration forms occurring in the
three above mentioned categories will be now summarized.
3.4.1 Simple terrazzo
The deterioration of the simple terrazzo, as the case studies demonstrated, is
strictly related to its location. The most severely decayed terrazzo are those in
open‐air areas, especially when they were not covered (case studies 6, 10, 13,20).
In the inner spaces the severest deterioration occurred in humid environments
(kitchens and bathrooms) (case studies 16a‐b, 17). This is no surprise, as both for
the weathering of stones (the aggregates) (Schaffer, 2004, 42) and of concrete
(the mortar) (Papadopoulou, 2008, 16‐17), the most damaging factors are the
presence of water and the variations in temperature.
In total, five are the main deterioration forms observed in terrazzo (3.12‐3.17):
Cracks: linear breaks of the floor, few millimetres large.
Found in different areas of the floor.
Erosion: abraded surface that has lost its superficial
compatibility and integrity, increasing its porosity and
diminishing the glow. Usually found in the main walking
paths of each floor.
Erosion of final grouting: when the last grouting is of a
different colour the erosion of the final grouting appears
like a discoloration of the surface. From a visual inspection
it seems that it affects neither its porosity nor its lucidity. It
is also found in the main walking paths of each floor.
Fig. 3.12 Source: Author
Fig. 3.13 Source: Author
Fig. 3.14 Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 43
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Lacunae: an irregular part of the floor that is missing; this
can be due either to heavy erosion of the aggregates
(most common) (fig. 3.15) or to erosion of the concrete
(fig. 3.16). Small superficial lacunae can be found on the
entire surface, while usually deeper lacunae, which involve
also one of the bedding layers, are found in the corners.
Stains: various types of deposit that have imprinted the
floor; for example oily or glue residues. They are mainly
found in the edges of the floors.
3.4.2 Terrazzo with decorative patterns
Terrazzo with decorative patterns presents the same deterioration forms of the
simple terrazzo. The above described deteriorations have been found in many
cases but are less intense and evident. I believe that this is due to three main
reasons. One can first of all suppose that more attention was given at the
moment of their fabrication. Then, that the areas with the decorative patterns
are not in humid areas of frequent use, like bathrooms and kitchens. And last,
due to their decorative motives, owners could have more easily appreciated
valuable manufactures and so eagerly cared for their everyday maintenance.
Fig. 3.15 Source: Author
Fig. 3.16 Source: Author
Fig. 3.17 Source: Author
The University
3.4.3 Mos
The deter
creation.
creating o
The three
due to the
In the cas
various ex
In the cas
found the
few lacun
by misuse
of the ma
Fig. 3.18 Sourc
Fig. 3.19 Source
Fig. 3.21 Sourc
Fig. 3.3.22 Sou
TERRA
y of York – MA
saic
rioration of
Mosaic flo
one surface
e cases take
eir differen
se of the Ba
xtended de
se of the L
e floor in an
nae in the p
es and bad
aterials.
ce: B.o.G. archive
e: B.o.G. archives
ce: B.o.G. archive
urce: B.o.G archiv
AZZO AND MO
in Conservation
f mosaics i
ors are sur
e, which me
en under co
t constitut
ank of Gree
eterioration
Cracks: l
the tesse
Erosion:
resistanc
Lacunae
mortar. U
Stains: v
imprinte
Loverdou‐Zi
n excellent
proximities
maintenan
es
s
es
ves
OSAIC FLOORS
n Studies, 2009
s quite diff
rfaces mad
eans that th
onsideratio
ion materia
ece, where v
n forms (3.1
inear break
erae.
abraded
ce of vitreo
: complete
Usually foll
various typ
ed on the flo
iller buildin
t preservati
s of the wa
nce of the b
S IN INTERWAR
ferent due
e by single
he result is
n, present
als.
vitreous gla
8‐3.21).
ks of the fl
tesserae
ous glass tile
e loss of t
ows the ou
pes of depo
oor.
ng, where p
ion status;
all. The only
building an
R BUILDINGS IN
to the par
e tesserae t
a non‐comp
different d
ass tiles we
oor betwe
surface, d
es to walkin
tesserae an
utline of the
osit that a
porcelain ti
no erosion
y importan
nd not due
N ATHENS: Con
rticularities
that is, sing
pact surfac
deterioratio
ere used, w
en and/or c
due to th
ng over the
nd/or the b
e tesserae.
are attache
iles were u
n, no cracks
t decay wa
to poor re
nservation Issu
4
in their
gle units
ce.
on forms
we found
crossing
he poor
em.
bedding
ed to or
sed, we
s, only a
as stains
sistance
es
44
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
The University
In the cas
similar to
could ind
preservat
presented
There are
later resto
The differ
Pallas The
frequency
the Lover
any case w
Summing
observati
cracks; e
vitreous
including
Fig. 3.23 Sou
Fig. 3.24 So
TERRA
y of York – MA
se of the P
colour an
dicate sam
tion status
d two decay
e no cracks,
oration inte
rence in the
eatre and th
y of use. W
rdou –Ziller
would be le
up, all t
on can be
rosion, inc
tesserae a
loss of tess
urce: Author
ource: Author
AZZO AND MO
in Conservation
Pallas theat
d dimensio
me manuf
s; but man
y forms (fig
Erosion o
the tesse
Exfoliati
the surfa
, and have
ervention.
e resistanc
he Loverdo
hile thousa
r Museum w
ess frequen
the main
e divided i
cluding sup
and exfolia
serae or ag
OSAIC FLOORS
n Studies, 2009
tre were u
on to those
facture. T
ny of the
g. 3.23, 3.24
of the glaz
erae
ion: comple
ace, usually
been found
e of the sa
ou –Ziller M
ands of visit
was for on
nted than th
decay for
nto three
perficial, g
ation for p
gregate, lo
S IN INTERWAR
sed also po
e in the Lo
hese floo
yellow an
4):
ing: found
ete loss of
y on the edg
d only a few
ame materi
Museum, is d
tors have w
nly few yea
he theatre.
rms of te
main cate
grouting er
porcelain t
oss of morta
R BUILDINGS IN
orcelain we
overdou‐ Zil
rs are ge
nd some o
where stai
the tessera
ges of the t
w lacunae f
al, porcela
definitely d
walked on t
rs of inten
errazzo an
egories: de
rosion, ma
tile tessera
ar and notc
N ATHENS: Con
ere used ti
ller buildin
enerally in
of the bla
ins have im
ae layer pa
tesserae.
filled proba
in tiles bot
ue to the d
the theatre
sively used
d mosaics
eposits and
aterial eros
ae; and l
ching (fig.3.
nservation Issu
4
iles very
g which
n good
ack tiles
mprinted
arallel to
ably in a
h at the
different
’s foyer,
d, and in
s under
d stains;
sion for
lacunae,
.25 ).
es
45
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 46
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Deposits/Stains Cracks Erosion Lacunae
3.5 Conclusion
In conclusion, the study of the floors of 20 buildings of the Interwar in Athens
highlighted the widespread use of terrazzo compared to mosaic floors.
Regarding the connection between different architectural types and choice of
flooring finish, one could notice a significant difference only in the modern
movement, which did not use mosaic at all and embraced terrazzo floor finishes.
Apart from that there is no strong connection between architecture and choice
of floor finish. In all other types of architecture either one of them or a
combination of the two is present with variations in technique, colour and
location. There is however a relation between location and value attributed to
each floor type and the significance of the building.
Fig. 3.25 Cummulative table of the main decay forms in terrazzo and mosaics, Source:
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 47
3. Case studies
3. Case studies
Location and choice of floor type are also easily translated into an expression of
social distinction. According to the economic profile of the owner, more or less
expensive flooring techniques were used. Mosaics were located in important
areas of the building and the same happened with terrazzo with decorative
patterns (fig. 3.26, 3.27). On the other hand, in rich constructions, terrazzo was
used in secondary and utility zones while in lower‐class constructions it is found
in all the inner and the outer spaces.
Location and the initial fabrication methods have a strong influence on the kind
and extension of decay of the floors. Depending on the different floor typology,
deterioration forms can be similar but may also have differences due to their
fabrication techniques, location and whether or not their artistic value is
recognized. Furthermore, same materials can also weather differently due to the
frequency of use of the room the floor is placed in.
Having identified the main deterioration forms, we should now propose some
solutions. As conservation is an art with theoretical bases, we will analyze the
conservation approach towards the recent architectural past. This will then certainly
result in the formulation of a valuable discussion with proposals for the conservation
problems of these floors.
Fig. 3.27 Same
building as 3.26; simple
terrazzo in the
corridors, Athens Source: Author
Fig. 3.26 Terrazzo with decorative patterns in the main entrance hallway, Neo‐academic building, City Center, Athens, Source: Author
Contemporary Conservation approach
to Recent Architecture
4
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 48
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
4. Contemporary Conservation approach to Recent Architecture
Conservation of artifacts and buildings is nowadays considered a science with
different philosophical backgrounds. I therefore think, before coming to the
discussion and proposals for the conservation problems of Interwar terrazzo and
mosaics, a brief overview of the principal schools of thought and the evolution of
this science should be done through the positions of its main representatives. It
is important to do so in order to mark the limits of traditional conservation
philosophy when applied to more recent buildings. Thus we can analyze which
of the traditional axioms are applicable to conservation of recent architecture
and also how and when a mutated approach might be necessary.
4.1 Historical overview of Architectural Conservation in Europe
We define conservation as all those actions that aim at preserving valuable
testimonies of the past. More than two centuries have elapsed from the day
Pietro Edwards in 1977 published his Capitolato, a text which as Munoz – Vinaz
(2005, 3) defines, can be considered the first written guidelines for architectural
conservation. During the nineteenth century, in Europe several theorists and
practitioners have attempted to leave their mark on what should be “correct
conservation”.
Two were definitely the most significant personalities of the nineteenth century
with worldwide influence. The French Eugene Viollet le Duc (1814‐1879) who
identified conservation as a completion “in style”, imitating and inventing
missing parts of the building (fig 4.1). and his extreme opposite, the Englishman
John Ruskin (1819‐1900) who, with a romantic approach to the charm of the ruin,
sustained that conservation must be the non‐alteration of that charm (fig. 4.2)
(Munoz‐ Vinas 2005; Jokilehto 2005; Sette 2001; Napoleone 2005c; La Regina
2005; Vassalo 1996; Marmotti‐ Politi 1996; de Martino G.1996; Ceschi 1970).
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 49
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
All other theories have been influenced by these two opposite theses, either
rejecting or combining their ideas. In Italy, Camillo Boito (1836‐1914) was one of
the most important figures in defining the monument as a historical document.
He insisted on the necessity of a philological approach, proposing the
simplification of forms and materials in the interventions. He was followed by his
student Gustavo Giovannoni (1873‐1947) who gave a more modern and scientific
approach to the subject (Munoz‐Vinas 2005; Jokilehto 2005; Grissoni 2005; Sette
2001; Curuni 2005, 1996; Di Biase 1996; Ceschi 1970).
At the same time, in Britain, William Morris (1834‐1896) founded the Society for
the Protection of Ancient Buildings and published the “Manifesto“against
destructive restoration, underlining the necessity for effective and honest repairs
and excluding any kind of imitation (Munoz‐ Vinas 2005; Jokilehto 2005; Esposito
2005; Sette 200; de Martino R. 1996; Ceschi 1970).
Some years later, at the beginning of the twentieth century, one of the most
significant theorists for the development of architectural conservation was the
Austrian Alois Riegl (1858‐1905). He introduced the concept of the monument
Fig. 4.1 Drawing by Viollet le Duc for the reconstruction of Saint Nazaire a Carcassone, France Source: Frerigang, C Kremier J (2003,349)
Fig. 4.2 Drawing by Ruskin, with all the detailsof the decay. San Michele, Luca, Italy Source: Ruhl, C (2003, 466)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 50
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
both as intended monument at the time of its construction, but also for edifices
which were later attributed the value of monument that is, architectural works
initially not intended to be monumental but evaluated as such at a later time..
Through this theory value was introduced in conservation (Napoleone 2005b;
Munoz‐ Vinas 2005; Jokilehto 2005; Sette 2001; Pretelli 1996; Ceschi 1970).
Half a century later Cesare Brandi (1906‐1988) in Italy reexamines the issue of
value. In 1963 he published the “Teoria del Restauro”, principally relative to works
of art, but also to architectural conservation. His theory was based on the
coexisting double value of the works: historical and aesthetic (Napoleone 2005;
Munoz‐ Vinas 2005; Jokilehto 2005; Sette 2001; Carbonara 1996; Ceschi 1970).
During the twentieth century different attempts were made for the organization
of all these schools of thought. As a result, Konsola (1995, 61) summarizes,
national and international charters (key examples: Athens 1931, Venice 1964,
Burra 1979, ICOMOS 2003,) and declarations (key examples: Amsterdam 1975,
Strasbourg 1985, Nara 1994 etc.) were issued and Heritage conservation
organizations, such as UNESCO, ICCROM, ICOMOS and lately the DOCOMOMO,
were founded. The efforts are incessant, re‐elaborating the principal theories and
previous conclusions, to demonstrate that conservation is a science in
continuous evolution.
4.2 Conservation of the recent architectural past
We have gone briefly over the main philosophical trends that formed the
conservation science of Historical Buildings in Europe. The question to be
answered now is whether these principles are just as valuable regarding the
conservation of our recent Built Heritage.
The first attempt towards an accurate study on the conservation of the closer
architectural past was in 1989 by the foundation of the DOCOMOMO
(DOcumentation and COnservation of buildings, sites and neighborhoods of the
MOdern MOvement). Next came the foundation of “ICOMOS 20th Century
Heritage International Scientific Committee” (Prudon 2008; Burke 2007; Casciato
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 51
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
1998). The publications and activities of these institutions are focused mainly on
the buildings of the Modern Movement. Even so, I personally think that
considerations regarding the conservation of early Modern Movements’
heritage, born during the Interwar years, can be applicable to other buildings of
that period too.
Unfortunately, as Iamandis (1989, 183) underlines, there is no clear philosophical
or methodological approach regarding our recent architectural Heritage. The
problems arise with relation to perceived values, as reflected in earlier
conservation debates by Riegl and Brandi,. In the case of recent Built Heritage
the most puzzling values are related to time and intention, intensified by the
construction methods.
It is imprinted in the western societies that Time/Age affords value to objects,
therefore to buildings as well. The main problem in the conservation of our
recent architectural past is therefore the short time elapsed from their creation
(Burke 2007; Guillet 2007; Philippot 2005; Maxwell 1997;) which gives Interwar
architecture a kind of familiarity. This is why it always becomes very difficult both
for individuals and for state organizations to consider these innovative
constructions as part of our architectural Heritage and subsequently care for
their safeguarding.
Initial intention is the second important issue in the evaluation process. Quite
often buildings of the time, considered today worthy of conservation, were
private constructions not intended to be monuments. They were actually not
constructed to last but only to be useful. Maxwell (1998, xiv) further analyzes,
that in some cases, buildings of that time were erected as a declaration of
opposition to tradition, to continuity. This brings about serious difficulties in the
process of their evaluation and eventual conservation.
Additional questions to the philosophical value issues arise from the fact that
materials then considered to be innovative and extraordinary are today common
and widespread (e.g. concrete.). Moreover, ignorance of the proper use of the
new materials at that time caused a poor resistance of the materials in time, thus
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 52
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
diminishing the later recognized value of the buildings even more. For those that
look down upon the architecture of that time, material failure represents the
symbolic failure of innovation, therefore architecture which does not deserve to
be saved (4.3‐4.4).
Limited time distance, initial intention and material choice makes the evaluating
process of our recent Built Heritage complicated. Even so, we have nowadays
slowly managed to start recognizing that the buildings of the Interwar years
represent an important moment of the architectural and social history. When it
comes to their conservation, how does this different evaluation process
influence major conservation considerations like authenticity and minimum
intervention?
Fig. 4.3 Refugee modern movement buildings in 1929 Source: Arseni (20024, 89)
Fig. 4.4 Same
buildings today, listed
Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 53
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
4.2.1 Authenticity in conserving our Recent Architectural Past
Authenticity has right from the start been one of the foremost debates in the
history of architectural conservation. In the Venice Charter, considered as the
main document for contemporary architectural conservation, the closing
sentence of the first paragraph of its preamble underlines:
“It is our duty to hand them on in the full richness of their authenticity.”
After this, the argument as to what the term authenticity referred to, came back
on the table. In the Eurocentric cultures authenticity has been usually identified
with material authenticity (Munoz‐ Vinas 2005; Jokilehto 2005; Ceschi 1970). In
the years to follow and as the term Heritage kept widening the concept of
authenticity had to be reexamined. Finally, in 1994, at the Nara meeting and in
article 13, a widened range of authentic value was expressed:
‘Depending on the nature of the cultural heritage, its cultural context, and its
evolution through time, authenticity judgments may be linked to the worth of a
great variety of sources of information. Aspects of the sources may include form
and design, materials and substance, use and function, traditions and techniques,
location and setting, and spirit and feeling, and other internal and external factors.
The use of these sources permits elaboration of the specific artistic, historic, social,
and scientific dimensions of the cultural heritage being examined.’ 1
From this document onwards we moved towards including the spiritual value of
a monument as authentic. As Petzet (2004, 29) accentuates, material
authenticity becomes subjective according to the different spiritual values given
by the observer. This fact will become the key for understanding the question of
authenticity regarding recent architecture.
The constructions of the Interwar years portray the transformation of the society
and the will for innovation. Their main value is purely symbolic and therefore 1 Full text in the International Council on Monuments and Sites website:
http://www.international.icomos.org/naradoc_eng.htm
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 54
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
what must be conserved and read by future generations is their spirit, the idea
(Prudon 2008; Iamandi 1999; Henket 1996). Contrary to the trend for the charm
of ruined antiquities, modern architecture needs to look new in order to transmit
this concept (Allan: 2007, 16). Therefore authenticity in the conservation of
recent constructions has less of a material and more of a spiritual value. As the
materials of that time weather very badly, they must be repaired. Hence,
integration of missing parts or replacement of failed material is acceptable and
usually preferable as it aims at preserving the authentic spirit of recent
architecture.
By evaluating spiritual as an authentic value for the recent Built Heritage,
integration and reconstruction can be a valuable conservation solution. There is,
however, another issue to be dealt with; the short lifetime of these buildings. If
the monumental value of a construction has not been recognized, replacement
and reconstruction actions can end up annihilating instead of conserving,. Where
important elements of the architectural expression are substituted by modern
elements, the authentic spirit of the construction is slowly but constantly
depleted.
When dealing with conservation of our recent architectural past, authenticity
expresses the predominance of spiritual value of the original idea over material
value. Even so, there is always the problem of how much integration and
replacement allows us to still speak of an authentic building. Is the principle of
the minimum intervention applicable and necessary also in conserving our recent
architectural past?
4.2.2 Minimum intervention in conserving our Recent Architectural Past
The principle of minimum intervention is another debate, as old as the
conservation science, born as an opposition to the falsification of history by
stylistic reconstruction. The main idea is to promote how little rather than how
much one should do to respect authenticity when intervening in a historical
building.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 55
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
As Munoz‐Vinas (2005, 188‐9) underlines, minimum intervention makes once
again evident the relativity of philosophical questions. He clarifies that a more
coherent thesis in conservation treatments should be “minimum intervention to
achieve its goals”. The main goal in conserving recent architecture, as we have
previously explained, is to keep alive the original concept of the building. In that
sense no extended additions or reconstructions should be accepted as they
could easily compromise the original architecture.
On the other hand, minimum intervention regarding materials should be
reconsidered, as Macdonald (1997, 181) emphasizes. Problems are once again
related to materials which were used with enthusiasm but without the required
technical knowledge, often ending up in severe deterioration. (Guillet 2007;
Christ 2001; Arnold 1982). These deteriorations, other than the aesthetic problem
previously explained, can be the beginning of a profound decomposition of the
structure and could cause serious problems, problems of stability. Since we are
dealing with buildings, safety should always be a priority; therefore, if we want to
keep using these buildings, a maximum intervention in their constitution
materials must be made.
To be able to keep the authentic spiritual values of recent architecture, one must
once again bear in mind that we commonly deal with buildings still in use yet with
a given value as monument. The concept therefore of minimum intervention,
regarding materials, has been transformed into maximum intervention. Even so,
spiritual value still requires a minimum intervention approach that acts as a
barrier to unjustified large scale interventions. Summing up, to keep the
authentic spirit of constructions, massive interventions in the materials should
only be made in cases of necessity and only in those parts of the structure that
really require it.
4.3 Conservation approach on the Architectural Heritage in Greece
Focusing on the geographical area our research we shall now examine the
approach to conserving architectural Heritage in Greece. It is necessary to report
first the main steps in recognizing architecture as Heritage legally and then the
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 56
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
contemporary approach that follows international standards towards recent
architecture.
The establishment of the new Greek state took place at the beginning of the
nineteenth century, in 1830. That was the time of the conclusion of the era of
Enlightenment , marked by the reevaluation of historicity and also the time when
the main conservation science debates were born. It is therefore easy to
understand how European sensitivity towards the testimonies of the past
immediately influenced the legislation of the new state which, as Papateropoulos
(2006, 1) reports, had passed had a law on the protection of antiquities as early
as 1834.
The term antiquities is the only one used in the Greek heritage legislation until
1950, until law 1469/19502 finally extended the protection of antiquities to
monuments as well. At the same time a steadily progressive incorporation of the
above mentioned international charters and regulations and joining specialized
organizations is observed, constantly giving more significance to architectural
heritage.
Presently architectural heritage in Greece is protected by the new archeological
law 3028 /20023: “On the Protection of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage in
General”. Ergolavou (2007, 12) explains that the new law gave a broader
definition to the meaning of Heritage and its safeguarding in Greece. Regarding
Built Heritage, this becomes clear in chapter two, article 6, entitled “Distinction
of immovable Monuments‐Classification”. In paragraph 1 it introduces a large
timescale classification of the monuments in:
antiquities created before until 1830;
recent constructions, after 1830 and more than 100 years old…;
2 Full text in the Hellenic Ministry of Culture website: http://www.yppo.gr/5/51/neot/n1469.jsp
3 Full text in the Hellenic Society for Law and Antiquity website: http://www.law‐
archaeology.gr/Index.asp?C=136
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 57
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
recent cultural objects less than 100 years old which are classified as
monuments due to their particular architectural, urban, social, ethnological,
folk, technical, industrial or in general historic, artistic or scientific
significance4.
From a legislative point of view the subject of our research is located in the last
category of monuments, that is, the recent constructions that are less than 100
years old. The question is whether the influence of this law is significant for the
protection of the recent architectural past.
4.3.1 Conservation of the recent architectural past in Greece
Let us first look at Charkiolakis’ (2007, unpublished) observation which
highlights the main problem of bringing once again the protection of
architectural heritage under a law composed basically for antiquities, always
leaving architectural Heritage in their shadow of antiquity. This creates
continuous conflicts both in ethical choices and in funding matters.
Furthermore, regarding the so called recent cultural objects, meaning in our case
the buildings of the Interwar years, they suffer a further distinction in the
classification of priorities due to the addition of the word ‘particular’ in the
definition. Giacumacatos (2003, B44) notes that this kind of distinction is double‐
edged. On the one hand it provides the opportunity to list and save recent
constructions too, but on the other it introduces subjectivity in safeguarding
some very important buildings of the thirties onwards as their “particular”
significance needs to be proven.
The problem of subjectivity is a major one as the buildings of the twentieth
century, contrary to earlier constructions, do not enjoy acceptance by their
obvious ally, public opinion, nor that of the state (Rigopoulos 2005 & 2008;
Tournikiotis 1989).
4 Idem
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 58
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
Fortunately during the last decades many specialists have been working on the
revaluation of this period’s architecture. The foundation of the Greek
DOCOMOMO in 1990, presently hosted in the Neo‐Hellenic Architectural Archives
of the Benaki Museum, was a significant start followed by the birth of a
systematic program of documentation of this architecture by the Hellenic Society
for the Protection of the Environment and the Cultural Heritage in 2001. Finally,
last year a similar new program was promoted by the Municipality of Athens
(Kontaratou‐Rassia 2008; Papakonstantinou 2008; Tournikiotis 1998). All these
initiatives, by organizing conferences, exhibitions and publications, contribute
positively to a greater awareness and appreciation of recent architecture.
In conclusion one could say that Greek law does provide protection to our recent
architecture. However, the problem comes back once again on the discussion of
values, as there is quite a skeptical approach towards recent constructions in
Greece too, yet specialists and organizations are working towards finding the
right solutions.
I would like to close this analysis with an observation by Giacumacatos (2003;
2006). He suggests that special legal provision should be dedicated to the
twentieth century architectural heritage. Once again he emphasizes that a
general guideline for conservation cannot be easily applied because the
conservation of recent architectural past has different thoughts and
philosophical issues to deal with.
4.5 Conclusion
In a science like conservation, with a strong philosophical background, any
absolute position is to be excluded a priori. We have seen that even if a
conservation approach has alternated several times in the last two centuries, the
generally accepted solutions are not fully applicable when it comes to recent
architecture.
The relativity of the conservation approach is a direct consequence of the
different values we recognize in the constructions to conserve. When it comes to
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 59
4. Contem
porary Conservation approach to R
ecent Architecture
recent architecture, the most important value to conserve is the idea, the initial
concept. As we come to deal with serious material failures, it is necessary to
intervene so as to restore the integrity of design and its symbolic and educative
value.
One could at this point argue that conservation of recent architecture returns to
one of the 18th century principal trends of restoration, the stylistic interventions
promoted by Viollet le Duc. Clearly there is a strong correlation, but we should
not underestimate that theories and declarations through the centuries have
given the recent architecture‘s conservation intervention a more moderate and
limited profile, excluding arbitrary “creative” interventions.
When it comes to the case of conserving recent architecture in Greece, one can
fortunately observe that international standards are adopted and followed. Even
more, the latest law on the protection of Greek Heritage gives a wider span to
the protection of the recent architectural past. The problem once again is
ignorance or lack of information on the value of these buildings, a problem that is
beginning to be seriously dealt with by different organizations and private
initiatives.
As Allan (2007, 15) summarizes, solutions for safeguarding our recent
architectural history stand in repair, improvement and reformation. So, we are
now going to discuss how conservation problems with terrazzo and mosaics,
presented in the case study chapter, can be approached through this particular
philosophical approach of the conservation of recent architecture.
Discussion5
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 60
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
The analysis of location and types of floor in a building and their main
preservation forms left open questions. Combining these problems with the
axioms of the contemporary approach t0 conservation in recent architecture we
now have enough elements to conduct a relative discussion. Its main aim is to
present solutions for the conservation of terrazzo and mosaics of Interwar
buildings in Athens. Thus, questions related to what we preserve and why,
economics and conservation but also to some practical intervention responses to
earlier preservation problems will now be highlighted.
5.1 Interwar architecture’s conservation issues
Architecture incorporates and expresses the history of every city and its
inhabitants (Zivas 1991, 162). Therefore, every attempt to preserve and safeguard
architectural past is an act of respect towards history. I strongly believe that
safeguarding the architecture of the years that marked the formation of the
modern urban society of Athens is of crucial importance. There are serious
problems regarding Interwar architecture and although more attention is
nowadays drawn to the great blow on modern movement, a brief explanation
will be made of how almost all Interwar architectural styles can be at risk.
Unfortunately in Greece, as Lavvas (1983, 28) emphasizes, from the foundation
of the new country in 1833 until today, architectural historical continuity has
repeatedly been disrupted, sacrificing the recent testimonies for the adoration of
the glorious ancient past. At this point the relation between architectural style
and safeguarding an Interwar building in Greece will be highlighted. Out of the
four main architectural styles of the Athenian Interwar, the only ones easily
salvaged, since they are obviously perceived as monumental, are the neo‐
academic constructions.
The modernist edifices are usually considered by the public as worth saving but
can still be undervalued by the state. A good example is the ‘unlisting’ and the
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 61
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
proposed demolition of one of the finest modernist, art‐deco buildings of Athens
on D. Areopagitou 17 str (case study 13) for the sake of the view from the New
Acropolis Museum. The ancient adoration position of the state has been
protested against by newspapers, organisations and the web community, with
worldwide participation, finally bringing the case to the Supreme Court.
The buildings of both popular and modern architecture are in an even less
privileged position. Popular architecture and its influences has often been
ignored even by specialist writers, and more so by common people. On the other
hand Modern movement architecture is neither widely understood nor accepted
and is often accused of being the cause of concretization and the multi‐storey
profile of Athens that occurred later, in the 60s and 70s. Absurd demolition
decisions are continuously taken these last years (Tournikiotis 2009, unpulished)
and actual demolitions of modern movement buildings (Kontaratou‐Rassia 2008,
43) are carried out (5.2‐5.3).
5.1 One of the most intensive public protests on the web, collecting till today 32610 signatures against the demolition of Areopagitou 17 str
building Source:
http://areopagitou17.blogspot.com/
5.3 The 20.01.2009 decision of the
court forbidding the demolition of
this building unfortunately
came too late for the buildings characteristic
entrance, Source:
www.monumenta.org
5.2 Ravine str, Kolonaki, City center, before the demolition Source: www.monumenta.org
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 62
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
Realizing that Interwar buildings are worth conserving one should think of how
they should be conserved. The different constitution elements of the buildings
must be preserved, avoiding any attempt at facadism, where the outer aspect is
conserved while the inner is completely demolished. As Earl (1996, 59)
emphasizes, a building expresses its documentary value only when it is not
treated as an accidental collection of elements but when the materials,
decoration and taste of the period are maintained. In this respect the choice of
floor finishes should be conserved as an inseparable part of the architectural
expression with strong symbolisms,.
5.2. Economics and conservation: a proposal
Conservation is strictly related to financing, like everything in contemporary
society. Apart from historic issues, as Earl (1996, 11) emphasizes, usually buildings
are preserved as a valuable source of income, serving contemporary needs.
The case of Interwar architecture in Athens is quite complex from an economic
point of view. This was a very fertile construction period with buildings that were
not designed to be monumental; so a large quantity of everyday constructions
has to be dealt with. Such a huge amount of Built Heritage to be preserved
creates serious funding problems as there is a growing amount of such buildings
but the funds for culture remain the same. Therefore, as the number of buildings
to conserve increases, the proportion of funds for each diminishes accordingly.
As a solution to the huge amount of recent architecture and its conservation,
Henket (1998, 14) proposes an accurate selective process. I would agree with
Henket that it is neither possible nor desirable to preserve all the works of our
recent past. Yet I disagree with the proposal for selection and an eventual listing
as being very risky. Selectivity is very subjective and could bring about the
demolition of masterpieces just because of differing tastes or conflicting
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 63
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
interests. Moreover, listing in Greece is seen as condemning the building to death
since the owner usually does not have the funds for a conservation intervention.
I strongly believe that the safeguarding of Interwar architecture, consequently of
recent history, stands within a process of evaluating the familiarity. Buildings of
those years stand in an ambiguous time distance from today. People perceive
them simply as old but at the same time familiar because their grandparents may
have constructed them and their own parents may also have lived there; it is
difficult as such to understand that these buildings could be valuable and
important testimonies of the past. The answer to funding problems could be in
convincing people of the value of their ownership. Well informed private
individuals may willingly care for and maintain the buildings as something
extraordinary, respecting their original architectural language.
Evaluating recent architecture also increases the commercial value of these
constructions. This is another key factor for their safeguarding because if owners
can see them as a valuable income resource they will care for their conservation.
For this model to succeed it should be made clear that what must be preserved is
the authentic spirit and the architectural language of the building. This, with
relation to the specific subject of our study, could act favorably and result in
caring and saving the original choice of flooring technique.
As analyzed, the answers to economic matters can be found in the private
initiatives. Understanding the given monumental value and keeping a building in
use can be a good solution. In addition, ordinary maintenance is always the most
economical answer to the expensive and extreme act of restoration. If we accept
that private initiative is a very important factor, then public awareness will
become the key for preserving Interwar architecture and its constitutional
elements.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 64
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
5.3 Public awareness
Before moving on to specific preservation problems the significant difference
between terrazzo and mosaics in relation to public awareness must be
underlined.
In Athenian Interwar architecture mosaics were located in buildings intended to
be monumental (case studies 5, 8, 11d ). Furthermore, in Greece mosaics are
easily perceived as an artistic expression, therefore precious, due to their
continuous use through the centuries in mural decorations of Greek‐orthodox
churches (fig 5.4). Because of these two characteristics, public awareness of
their value and consequently of the necessity for their conservation, is a
spontaneous reaction like in the case of the floors of the recently restored Pallas
theatre (case study 11d) and the protection of the floors from walkers in the Bank
of Greece, automatically turning them into museum pieces. (case study 5).
On the other hand, since history continuously repeats itself, terrazzo just like its
ancient expression battuto (Maioli, M. G. pers. comm. 2002), has for long been
undervalued and often destroyed as in the case of the internal yard of the house
in Petralona (case study 18) and the bathroom of the second floor in the modern
building of case study 16b . The undervaluation of terrazzo, seen as a very poor
and insignificant constructive element and only related to the secondary areas of
the building, was obvious while talking about the subject of my dissertation to
5.4 Osios Loukas church, detail
from the arches’ Mosaic byzantine
decoration Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 65
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
various owners (Chatzinikoli M, Georgiadis N, Malliaris E, Meleggoglou I, Nikos
Tartzanis, N; pers.communication January 2009); its artistic expression
possibilities were completely ignored.
Yet, while visiting to take photographs of the floors, some of these owners
were becoming curious of the fact that I was interested in this kind of flooring
(case studies 2, 4, 7, 10, 16a). After some chatting, explaining the relation
between terrazzo and mosaic and the historical continuity of this kind of
technique, things sometimes changed; indifference turned to pleasure and pride
for their floors and buildings, with a feeling of owning a symbolic piece of history.
In conclusion, in cases of mosaics people are already aware of the importance of
that flooring technique, while regarding terrazzo, wider information must still be
given. To save the terrazzo technique it is urgent to divulge its historical,
symbolic and aesthetic values.
5.4 Guidelines for restoration problems
Having understood the importance of safeguarding Interwar architecture with all
its elements, in our case the original floorings, the cases where more than
ordinary maintenance is required will now be considered.
As already explained, conservation of recent architecture must safeguard the
authentic, symbolic power of the original architectural language of the time. In
our cases, floor finishes must also look integral, therefore often invasive
restoration interventions must be made.
Certainly, in restoration interventions there is not one solution that fits all. For
any kind of intervention to be successful it has to previously be carefully studied
and planned. To find the correct solutions the constituent materials must be
analyzed in order to create a visibly harmonious and at the same time materially
compatible intervention. Even so, after years of personal hands on experience in
the restoration field of ancient mosaics I have noticed that there are some quite
standardized and common restoration procedures that give valuable solution.
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 66
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
Even if cement replaced lime mortars fabrication techniques are similar to the
ancient, so I believe these standard procedures could also be applied on
‘modern’ terrazzo and mosaics.
In the case studies I came across very few interventions, mainly failed filling of
the lacunae (case studies 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 18, 21) (fig. 5.4). Combining satisfactory
solutions from my craft experiences with the observations in chapter 3 for the
main decay forms, I would like to propose some general guidelines, subdivided
according to decay and flooring technique.
As seen in our case studies, there are some predominant decay forms (fig. 3.25):
deposits, cracks, lacunae and erosion. For these main decay forms of terrazzo
and mosaic the most common interventions, presented in their typical
application sequence, are the following (fig.5.5 ):
Decay form Restoration Intervention
Deposits (attached or not) Dry, wet, chemical or mechanical cleaning
Cracks Mortar filling
Lacunae Integration
Erosion Consolidation
Beyond preservation, the following guidelines aim at fulfilling conservation issues
relating to the coexisting values of every artifact, aesthetic and material, as
introduced by Brandi (1977, 6). Material integrity and aesthetic compatibility must
5.4 Examples of various failed lacunae repairs, Source: Author
5.5 Table of the main decay forms and relative treatments, Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 67
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
be ensured respecting the architectural language of the original architecture. The
next paragraphs will give a brief overview of how to achieve this result.
5.4.1 Deposits ‐ Cleaning
The importance of cleaning the surfaces before any conservation treatment must
never been undervalued for two reasons: First, because only when the surface is
clean the real preservation status can be comprehended. Second, if the dirt is
not removed it could be pushed into the structure and consolidated with some of
the following restoration treatments.
All these floors have survived ordinary housekeeping for decades. This proves
that any kind of water and/or soap cleaning can be safely applied. There are only
two suggestions to be taken into consideration:
Chemically aggressive products, like those based on ammonium or chloride acids,
as well as abrasive techniques should generally be avoided as they could
augment porosity and accelerate other decay processes.
In addition, for the specific case of the mosaic in the Bank of Greece, where
fragile vitreous tesserae have been used, only soft and dry cleaning is suggested.
5.6 Dry cleaning, Source: Author
5.7 Wet cleaning with soft brushes,
Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 68
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
5.4.2 Cracks ‐ Mortar Filling
The crack decay form is very common to terrazzo and was also present in a
mosaic in one of our case studies. The restoration intervention by mortar filling is
usually a localized small scale operation in these cases.
Before integrating a crack it is strongly recommended to monitor it. If after some
time the crack does not grow, then one could fill it with compatible mortar.
Otherwise, if the crack is still active, the filling will be expelled on the first
thermal variation.
The procedure starts with is dry cleaning by aspiration. It is followed by wetting
with water, which ensures the upcoming adhesion of the mortar to the surface
(fig. 5.7). Again, if the crack is very deep, it is a good practice to inject some
mortar mix in a very liquid state (fig. 5.6). After wetting it, either with water or
liquid mortar, the crack will be filled with a both chromatically and materially
compatible mortar, usually with a spatula. The final step consists in eliminating
any excess mortar with a wet and carefully strained sponge.
5.7 Injection for wetting Source: Author
5.8 Injection with liquid mortar Source: Author
5.9 Filling with mortar by spatula Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 69
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
5.4.3 Lacunae ‐ Integration
5.4.3.1 Mosaic
Integrating a lacuna in a mosaic is of crucial importance as, due to the
discontinuity in the structure of mosaics, lacunae create the broken necklace
effect (fig. 5.9). That is, if one tessera is missing, the adjacent ones will easily
follow and so on. Different techniques have been developed for integrating
lacunae in mosaics in a more or less traceable manner. As has already been
explained integrity in recent architecture conservation is of fundamental
importance, both visual and material. Therefore out of the numerous techniques,
two are briefly presented here as valuable solutions to the need for integrity.
Integration with same or similar material.
As in cases (case studies 5, 11d) of mosaics floors made out of ceramic tile
tesserae, still in use, resisting and aesthetically accepted solutions have to be
found. The mosaic can be reproduced either by the same material i.e. new
ceramic tiles, or by other resisting materials, like stones of the same chromatic
quality, cut in the same dimension of the original mosaic and following the
original mosaic pattern. The key for a successful intervention stands in deepening
the lacuna so as to have the necessary space to apply preparatory and laying
mortar, the tesserae too on the correct level (fig. 5.10).
5.9 The broken necklace effect Source: Author
5.10 Integration with similar
material, Pallas
theater, Athens Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 70
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
Integration with incised mortar.
This technique can be applied only in cases where the mosaic is exhibited as a
museum object, meaning mosaics not stepped on (case study 5a). In this
technique there is no need to deepen the lacuna; the void is filled with a mortar
at the level of the surface. Moments after and while the mortar dries but is still
workable, the surface is incised with the help of a small spatula or a lancet
simulating the tesserae form (fig. 5.11). The integration is completed by colouring
the surface (fig. 5.12). This technique, widespread in ancient mosaic restoration,
gives excellent results at a very low cost yet the colour is not resistible in case of
ordinary use of a mosaic.
5.4.3.2 Terrazzo
In terrazzo, when the lacunae are formed from the erosion of aggregates then
they should be repaired with a plastic material imitating their colour and form.
First, the lacuna must be cleaned, eliminating the rest of the aggregate that
would otherwise keep decaying under the integration. Then, integration can be
made with coloured concrete mortar or synthetic resins. The substitution of the
missing aggregate with original material would not be a good practice as the
aggregates have irregular forms and are not reproducible. By inserting a smaller
aggregate, the filling of the surrounding gap would be attracting attention due
to its different colour tone, thus spotting the intervention area (fig. 5.13).
5.11 Incised mortar formed to imitate tessera Source: Author
5.12 Colouring
Incised tessera Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 71
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
When the lacunae are larger zones, a new layer of terrazzo mixture can be
applied after an accurate study of the size and colour of aggregates and binders.
It is quite difficult to succeed in such an intervention; therefore different tests
must be made on a separate surfaces (like on a wooden table) before choosing
the correct proportion of materials.
In both cases, the restoration intervention will be completed with grouting and
polishing.
5.4.4 Erosion ‐ Consolidation
The cases of erosion and their following treatment are strictly related to the
constitution material of the floor. The extension of the intervention will be
related to the extension of the erosion.
5.4.4.1 Mosaics
In the case of vitreous tesserae, the intervention must be focused on a surface
treatment which will consolidate the glass vitreous structure. In the case of
porcelain tile tesserae, where erosion usually destroys the glazing, a non‐
restorable situation, the tiles must be consolidated to increase their resisting
characteristics. In both cases the treatment is given by spraying or brushing the
surface until rejection.
5.4.4.2 Terrazzo
Erosion in our terrazzo case studies has been observed as the most common
decay form. To recreate a compact surface the grouting procedure must be
5.14 Quite well done
Lacunae filling
Source: Author
5.13 Marked intervention area by surrounding void Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 72
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
repeated all over the surface. This operation consists in applying by spatula a
mortar of cooked linseed or a glue, cement and lime. The mix should be left to
dry for about a week, then the surface should be polished it with a grouting
stone machine. As highlighted by Crovato (2002, 75) for a good maintenance of
any terrazzo, this operation should be repeated periodically every 5 to 10 years.
5.4.5 Extremely decayed floors
In our cases we found heavily decayed floors only in terrazzo of secondary and
open‐air areas (case studies 6, 10, 13, ). If the number of lacunae and cracks is too
large, apart from the fact that the integrations would create an aesthetically
confusing patchwork, they would also end up in an extremely expensive
operation. For these reasons and as in recent architecture the material value is
less important than the aesthetic authentic value, these floors should be
replaced instead of restored. Even so, the replacement must be made in such a
way as to recreate a terrazzo floor respecting the authentic architectural
language.
There were no cases of extreme decay in mosaics, but if that occurred, it would
be very difficult and expensive to propose a replica of the original floor again in
mosaic.
5.4.6 Documentation of the interventions
All the above described operations must definitely be accompanied by an
accurate documentation. The documentation process, photos, mapping graphs
and observation reports, must be made before, during, and after the operation.
Once again, what should never be forgotten is that collecting infinite data should
not be an end in itself; it must be a procedure focused on organizing a
consultable system for the future.
In the case of conservation of recent architecture documentation plays a crucial
role for two more reasons. First, due to the choice of integrating without leaving
any visible traces so as to reinstate the authentic aspect to the building,
documentation will be the only evidence of these actions. Then, documentation
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 73
5. Discussion
5. Discussion
can be a valuable future resource for the creation of a data base on the aging of
these materials and also on their behaviour in relation to contemporary materials
used in the intervention.
5.5 Conclusion
Summing up, the discussion started by emphasizing the importance of
safeguarding our architectural past as a testimony to our history. For Interwar
architecture and its floors conservation is usually problematic not due to the
young age of the buildings but mainly with relation to the evaluation or non
evaluation of the different architectural typologies.
Examining economics and conservation one faces another serious matter; the
large quantity of Interwar buildings in Athens. At this point the suggestion is to
avoid a historical‐mummifying approach and try giving value to familiarity.
People and public awareness are the key for safeguarding mosaic but especially
the undervalued terrazzo floors of the Athenian Interwar. Once the public
realizes the historic and financial value of these constructions and their
constituent elements, it will actively participate in their conservation through the
economical solution of ordinary maintenance.
To conclude the discussion about terrazzo and mosaics as well as the issues on
their conservation, a final overview of solutions for decay has been made.
Guidelines have been given for cases where deterioration is evident, and
according to the theories of conservation for recent architecture, maximum
material interventions are required.
Having completed the study and observations of this research we will now move
on to the final conclusions.
Appendix
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
75 The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
5. Discussion
Alppendix -I
Appendix I: Case studies
5 extra case studies of Modern Movement Buildings
THE CONSERVATION OF TERRAZZO & MOSAICS OF INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Appendix I
Case Study 21 General D
ata
Name ‐
Location Likavittou 5 & Solonos str, Kolonaki – City Center
Year 1934
Architect Sgoutas, K.
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building is a modern movement five‐storey apartment building, originally residences, nowadays used as residences and offices. The terrazzo floors under observation are: one in the lateral external entrance of the building and some on the landing of the staircases and the building’s secondary entrance; no entry to the apartments was possible.
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s. 220 View from Solonos Source: Author
c.s. 221 View from Solonos & Lykavittou str Source:
Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
Case Study 21 Floor Data
3. Case studies
Appendix I Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours In: Light blue Out: Grey
Observations In: Use of terrazzo for the landing of the staircases and in the secondary entrance’s floor. Out: The whole corridor
Preservation
status
In: Very good condition Deterioration form: Erosion of grouting Out: Very bad condition Deterioration form: Cracks, Lacunae
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.226 Surface erosion Source: Author
c.s.227 Cracks Source: Author
c.s.224 The lateral entrance to the building on Lukavittou Source: Author
c.s.225 The internal
entrances Source: Author
c.s.222‐223Terrazzo detail Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 1
Case Study 22 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies A
ppendix I Name Kardaras’ house
Location Megalou Vasileiou 12 & Korai, N. Smyrni – Suburb
Year 1939
Architect (?)
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building was a modern movement one storey refugees house. In 1981 two more floors were added on the top of the original building. The terrazzo floors under observation are in ground floor of the original building in all the rooms, apart from the bedrooms and the office which have wooden floors
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s. 250‐252 View from
M. Vasileiou and Korai
the original building Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 1
Case Study 22 Floor Data
3. Case studies
Appendix I Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Red with yellow aggregates, entrance and hall Red, with white aggregates, corridor and kitchen
Observations Terrazzo in entrance, main hall, corridor and kitchen. The bathroom has mosaic tiles.
Preservation
status
Excellent condition. All the decay was caused by extraordinary events, like planting concrete columns to add floors, or demolishing a wall to modify the spaces.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.230‐231 Terrazzo detail Source: Author
c.s.232 The main hall Source: Author
c.s.233 Corridor to the Kitchen Source: Author
c.s.234 Filled lacunae Source: Author
c.s.235 Lacunae Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 1
Case Study 23 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies A
ppendix I Name ‐
Location Ermou 44, Syntagma – City Center
Year (?)
Architect (?)
Listing number Not listed
Short description The building is a modern movement apartment building, originally residences, nowadays used as offices. The floors under observation are in an apartment of the fourth floor. The apartment had wooden floors and terrazzo at its service entrance. At the last renovation of August 2008, the terrazzo in question was destroyed. A terrazzo is also found in the secondary entrance of the building.
External view
Plan:
c.s. 235 View from Ermou
Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 1
Case Study 23 Floor Data
3. Case studies
Appendix I Type Terrazzo Floor detail
Main colours Grey, service area Yellow, secondary entrance of the building
Observations The terrazzo of the apartment has been destroyed.
Preservation
status
The grey terrazzo of the apartment was in very bad condition as it had previously been covered with a glued on carpet. The terrazzo of the secondary entrance in good condition except for one crack.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.237‐238 Terrazzo detail Source: Author
c.s.239 The secondary entrance Source: Author
c.s.240 The secondary
entrance of the apartment
Source: Author
c.s.241 Glue residues Source: Author
c.s.242 Cleaning test Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 1
Case Study 24 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies A
ppendixI Name
Location Ypsliantou 28, Kolonaki – City Center
Year (?)
Architect (?)
Listing number Not Listed
Short description This is a modern movement three‐storey apartment building, originally residences, nowadays still used as such. The terrazzo floor under observation is in the building’s entrance; no entry to the apartments was possible.
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s. 244 View from
Ypsilantou Source: Author
c.s. 243 Detail of Entrance Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 1
Case Study 24 Floor Data
3. Case studies
Appendix I Type Terrazzo and Marble Floor detail
Main colours Yellow
Observations Terrazzo with large aggregates, alternating with white and red marble forming rhombs.
Preservation
status
Very good Deterioration form: Lacunae, due to the elevated erosion of the mortar not the aggregate.
General view
Floor decay particulars
Figure 1
c.s.245 Terrazzo detail Source: Author
c.s.246 The main entrance Source: Author
c.s.247 The main entrance Source: Author
c.s.248 Lacunae due to mortar erosion Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 1
Case Study 25 General D
ata 3. C
ase studies A
ppendix I Name
Location Irodotou 9, Kolonaki – City Center
Year (?)
Architect (?)
Listing number Not Listed
Short description The building has both traces of modern movement and influences of the popular style with an arched entrance. It is a four‐storey apartment building, originally residences with two shops on the ground floor, nowadays still used as such. The terrazzo floor under observation is in the building’s entrance; no entry to the apartments was possible.
External view
Plans:
No plan available
c.s. 250 View from Irodotou
Source: Author
c.s. 249 Detail of popular style inspired main entrance Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 1
Case Study 25 Floor Data
3. Case studies
Appendix I Type Terrazzo and Marble Floor detail
Main colours Yellow
Observations Terrazzo with large aggregates, alternating with white marble forming rhombs. Could be the so called ‘kozanitiko' terrazzo as the small aggregates appear to be golden.
Preservation
status
Very good Deterioration form: Lacunae, due to the elevated erosion of the mortar not the aggregate.
General view
Floor decay particulars
c.s.251 Floor detail Source: Author
c.s.252 The main entrance
Source: Author
c.s.253 Lacunae due to mortar erosion Source: Author
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
76 The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
5. Discussion
Alppendix -I
Appendix II: Elliniki Etairia
24 photos of the research of Elliniki Etairia (2008)
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Elliniki Etairia Resarch‐1 ‘Protection and evaluation of architectural heritage of the 1930s –modern movement‐ of the Municilpality of Athens’,
Records: arch. Katerina Chatzikonstantinou, Source: Elliniki Etairia
Appendix II
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Elliniki Etairia Resarch‐2 ‘Protection and evaluation of architectural heritage of the 1930s –modern movement‐ of the Municilpality of Athens’,
Records: arch. Katerina Chatzikonstantinou, Source: Elliniki Etairia
Appendix II
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009
3. Case studies
Elliniki Etairia Resarch‐3 ‘Protection and evaluation of architectural heritage of the 1930s –modern movement‐ of the Municilpality of Athens’,
Records: arch. Katerina Chatzikonstantinou, Source: Elliniki Etairia
Appendix II
Resources
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 77
5. Discussion
Resources
Primary resources
Archives
Archives of the Byzantine and Christian Museum, ‘Loverdos Muesum archive’, January 2009 Bank of Greece, ‘Department of Historical archives and collections’, January 2009 Ellliniki Etairia‐ SAK (Hellenic Society for the Protection of the Environment and
the Cultural Heritage, Council for Conservation of Architectural Heritage),
Project: «Προστασία και ανάδειξη της αρχιτεκτονικής κληρονομιάς της
δεκαετίας του 1930 (μοντέρνου κινήματος) του Δήμου Αθηναίων» (Protection
and evaluation of architectural heritage of the 1930s –modern movement‐ of the
Municilpality of Athens), Project director: archaeologist Eirini Gratsia/SAK,
Researcher –records: architect Katerina Chatzikonstantinou., January 2009
Neo‐Hellenic Architecture Archives of the Benaki Museum©, ‘E. Zillers archive’, February 2009
Interviews
Owners:
Chatzinikoli M, case study 16b , December 2008
Flenga‐Kouremenou M, case study 13, January 2008
Georgiadis N, case study 20, December 2008
Kardaras A, case study 22, December 2008
Karakostas P, case study 4, January 2008
Malliaris P and E, case study 10, February 2009
Meleggoglou I, case study 16, January 2009
Moralis I, February, case study 9, 2009
Perdikis S, case study 23, July 2008
Tzartzanis N, case study 18, December 2008
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 78
5. Discussion
Resources Architects:
Kalliga E, January 2009
Deligiannis C, January 2009
Koumanoudis I, February 2009
Secondary Resources
Bibliographic Resources
Arseni, K (2004) Athens Between the wars through photographs of Petros Poulidis,
Athens: Commercial Bank of Greece
Asimakopoulou‐Atzaka, P (2003) Ψηφιδωτά Δάπεδα‐Προσέγγιση στην τέχνη του
αρχαίου ψηφιδωτού (Mosaic floors‐approach to the art of ancient mosaics),
Thessaloniki: University Studio Press
Allan, J (2007) ‘Points of Balance’, in Macdonald S, Normandin, K and Kinderd, B
(eds), Conservation of Modern Architecture, 13‐46, Dorset: Donhead
Bardeschi, M (2004) Restauro: Due punti e da capo, Milan: FrancoAngeli
Bucci, G and Farioli, R and Guarieri, G (2006)‘Mosaici di Ravenna e del
Mediterraneo’, in Augenti, A and Bertelli, C (eds), Santi Bancheri Re, 84‐96,
Milano: Skira
Burke, S (2007) ‘Twentieth century Heritage International Scientific Committee’,
in Macdonald S, Normandin, K and Kinderd, B (eds), in Conservation of Modern
Architecture, 143‐150, Dorset: Donhead
Bertelli, M (1988) Il Mosaico, Milano: Mondadori
Βiris, K (1996) “Αι Αθήναι” (Athens), Athens: Melissa
Biris, M (2003) Αθηναϊκή Αρχιτεκτονική 1875‐1925 (Athenian Architecture 1875‐
1925), Athens: Melissa
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 79
5. Discussion
Resources Biris, M (2000) Η ίδρυση της Αθήνας‐ Σχεδιασμός και Πολεοδομική εξέλιξη, Αθήνα
από την κλασσική εποχή ως σήμερα (Foundation of Athens, Design and Urban
development, Athens form the Classic ages till today), Athens: Kotinos
Brandi, C (1977) Teoria del Restauro, Turin: Einaudi
Bosia, D (2002) ‘La tecnica “moderna” del Mosaico’, in Biscontin, G and Driussi, G
(eds), I Mosaici Cultura, Tecnologia, Conservazione, 380‐388 , Venezia: Arcadia
Ricerche
Cangemi, A (2001) Making Mosaics – Materials, Tools, Techniques, Palermo:
Eurogrfica
Carbonara, G (1996) ‘Cesare Brandi’, in Casiello, S (ed), La cultura del restauro,
339‐356, Venice: Marsilio
Casciato, M (1998) ‘Confronting the Modern in Architecture: The Limit, the Limit’,
in DOCOMOMO Conference Proceedings: Vision and Reality, 183‐187, Stockholm:
Docomomo Sweden
Ceschi, C (1970) Teoria e Storia del Restauro, Rome: Mario Bulzoni
Chatzidakis, P (2003) Delos, Athens: Olkos
Chatzifotiou, Z (2003) Το Κολωνάκι πριν την άλωση (Kolonaki before the invasion),
Athens: L. Brazioti
Cholevas, N (1998) Η Αρχιτεκτονική της μετάβασης στην Αθήνα του μεσοπολέμου
(Architecture of transition in Athens of the interwar), Athens: Libro
Cholevas, N (1994) Αρχιτεκτονική του μεσοπολέμου στα Βαλκάνια (Architecture
of the interwar in the Balkans), Athens: Filippoti
Curuni, S.A (1996) ‘Gustavo Giovannoni. Pensieri e principi di restauro
architettonico’, in Casiello, S (ed), La cultura del restauro,269‐292, Venice: Marsilio
Curuni, S.A (2005) ‘Gustavo Giovannoni’, in Torsello, B (ed), Che cos’e’ il restauro?,
87‐90, Venice: Marsilio
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 80
5. Discussion
Resources Constantopoulos, E (1999) ‘From City Dwelling to Multi Dwelling’, in Kontaratos,
S (ed), Greece 20th century, 79‐88, New York: Prestel
Clogg, R (2002), Συνοπτική ιστορία της Ελλάδας 1770‐2000 (A concise History of
Greece). Athens: Katoptro
Curl, J S (2006) Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Oxford:
University Press
De Chiara, J Panero, J and Martin, Z (2001), Time‐saver Standards for Interior
Design and Space, New York: McGraw‐Hill
De Luca, M (1989) Il Mosaico per immagini, Ravenna: Essegi
De Martino, G (1996) La ricaduta del pensiero di Ruskin sulla cultura italiana del
XIX e XX secolo, in Casiello, S (ed), La cultura del restauro, 141‐146, Venice: Marsilio
De Martino, R (1996) ‘William Morris e la “protezione dei monumenti”’, in
Casiello, S (ed), La cultura del restauro, 147‐158, Venice: Marsilio
Demathas, Z (2005) Διαδικασίες αστικοποίησης κατα το πρώτο τρίτο του 20ου
αιώνα, στο Ελευθέριος Βενιζέλος και Ελληνική Πόλη (Urbanization procedures in
the first third of the 20th century, in Eleutherios Venizelos and the Greek Town), 35‐
47, Athens: TEE
Di Biase, C (1996) ‘Camillo Boito’, in Casiello, S (ed), La cultura del restauro, 159‐
182, Venice: Marsilio
Dunabin, K (1999) Mosaics of the Greek and Roman World, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Earl J. (1996), Building Conservation and Philosophy, Reading: The College of
Estate Management
Esposito, D (2005) ‘William Morris’, in Torsello, B (ed), Che cos’e’ il restauro?, 99‐
102, Venice: Marsilio
Farneti, M (1993) Glossario tecnico‐storico del Mosaico, Ravenna: Longo
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 81
5. Discussion
Resources Fessa‐ Emmanouil, E and Marmaras B (2005) 12 Έλληνες Αρχιτέκτονες του
μεσοπολέμου (12 Greek Architects of the Interwar), Heraklion: Crete University
Press
Fiori, C, Tolis, N and Canestrino, C (2003) Mosaici a ciottoli capolavoria decline del
arte musiva piu antica da Pella a Delos, Ravenna: Girasole
Fiorentini‐Roncuzzi, I and Fiorentini, E (2001) Mosaico Materiali, Tecniche e Storia,
Ravenna: MWeV
Fisher, H (1957), A History of Europe From the beginning of the 18th century to 1937,
London: Eyre & Spottiswoode
Frerigang, C and Kremier J (2003) ‘Euguene Emmanuel Viollet le Duc’, in Teoria
del architettura 117 trattati dal rinascimento a oggi, 344‐ 355, Koln:Taschen
Galani, S (1997) ‘Οι γειτονιές του κέντρου της Αθήνας στην περίοδο του
μεσοπολέμου ο χώρος ως έκφραση των κοινωνικών αντιλήψεων της εποχής’,
στο Αρχιτεκτονική και πολεοδομία από την αρχαιότητα έως σήμερα η περίπτωση
της Αθήνας (‘Athens central neighbourhoods in the Interwar space as expression
area for the social beliefs of the time’, Architecture and urbanism from antiquity
till now – The case of Athens), 171‐176, Athens: Arsenidi
Galli, G (1989) Il Mosaico nella tradizione di Ravenna. Storia, materiali, tecniche,
Torino: Ulisse
Giacumacatos, A (2006) ‘Ο νέος αρχαιολογικός νόμος και η προστασία της
μοντέρνας αρχιτεκτονικής’, στο Τουρνικίωτης Π, (επ) Do.co.mo.mo 01 Που είναι
το Μοντέρνο; (The New archaeological law and the protectction of modern
architecture, in Tornikiotis, P (ed) Do.co.mo.mo 01 Where is the modern?) Athens:
Futura
Giacumacatos, A (2004) Ιστορία της ελληνικής αρχιτεκτονικής 20ος αιώνας
(History of Greek architecture 20th century), Athens: Nefeli
Giacumacatos, A (2003) Η μοντέρνα αρχιτεκτονική είναι διατηρητέα (The
modern Architecture is listed), To Vima. n.13917. B44
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 82
5. Discussion
Resources Giacumacatos, A (1999) From Conservatism to populism, pausing at Modernism
The Architecture in the Interwar Period, in Kontaratos, S (ed) Greece 20th century,
27‐40, New York: Prestel
Guarino, M (2004) ‘La lunga stagione di un’arte minore’, in Guarino, M (ed)
L’immagine e il frammento ‐ Il mosaico in Emiglia‐Romagna, 13‐25, Bologna:
Compositori
Iliopoulos, D (2000) Εν Αθήναις, Κάποτε… (In Athens, Then…), Athens: Ellinika
Grammata
Guillet, A (2007) Docomomo international, in Macdonald S, Normandin, K and
Kinderd, B ( eds), Conservation of Modern Architecture, 151‐156, Dorset: Donhead
Grisoni, M (2005) ‘Camillo Boito’, in Torsello, B (ed) Che cos’e’ il restauro?, 95‐98,
Venice: Marsilio
Henket, H (1998) ‘The icon and the ordinary’, Cunningham,A (ed) Modern
Movement Heritage, 13‐17, London: Routledge
Iamandi, C (1989) ‘The should not of the Conservation Doctrine: on the
Legitimacy of Reconstruction of MOMO Architecture’, in DOCOMOMO Conference
Proceedings: Vision and Reality, 183‐187, Stockholm: Docomomo Sweden
Johns, C (2007), 1922 Ο μεγάλος ξεριζωμός (1922 The great uprooting), Athens:
Lambrakis
Jokilehto, J (2005) A History of Architectural Conservation, Oxford: Elsevier
Butterworth – Heinemann
Kassimatis, G (1999), “Το Σύνταγμα του 1927” στο Νεότερη Πολιτική Ιστορία της
Ελλάδος 1750‐1940 (The Constitution of 1927 in Modern Greek Political History 1750‐
1940), 205 ‐ 393, Athens: Livanis
Kairofila, G (1988) Η Αθήνα του Μεσοπόλεμου (Athens in the Interwar), Athens:
Melissa
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 83
5. Discussion
Resources Kaplan, R (2002) Φαντάσματα των Βαλκανίων (Balkan Ghosts), Athens: Roes –
Printa
Keyens, J (1974), The general History of Employment, Interest and Money, London:
Macmillan
Kolefas, G (1983) H τέχνη του ψηφιδωτού (The technique the Mosaics), Athens:
EOMMEX
Konsola, D (1995) Η διεθνής προστασία της πολιτιστικής κληρονομιάς (The
international protection of the world Cultural Heritage), Athens: Papazisis
Kontararou‐Rassia, R (2008) Η σύγχρονη Αθηνά γκρεμίζει τη μοντέρνα
(Contemporary Athens demolishes the modern), Eleutherotipia. n. 19912. 43
Koumanoudis, I (2001) Η Εκάλη που έφυγε 1920‐1941 (Ekali that has gone lost 1920‐
1941) Athens: TEE
Kosmidis, D (1997), Άτλας της Παγκόσμιας Ιστορίας (Atlas of International
History), Athens: Kathimerini
Koutsoukos, G (1984) Σελίδες από την παλιά Αθήνα (Pages from old Athens),
Athens: Estia
Kyriakidis, B (2001), Επίτομη Ελληνική Ιστορία (Abridged Greek History), Athens:
Kyriakidis
La Regina, F (2005) John Ruskin, In Torsello, B (ed) Che cos’e’ il restauro?, 103‐106,
Venice: Marsilio
Lavvas, G P (1983), ‘Θεσμική προστασία της Ελληνικης Παραδοσιακής
Αρχιτεκτονικής: Φάσεις‐ Αντιφάσεις – Κίνδυνοι’ στο Συντήρηση και Αναβίωση
Παραδοσιακών Κτιρίων και Συνόλων (Constitutional protection of the Greek
traditional architecture: Diction – Contradiction – Dangers in Conservations and
revitalisation of Traditional Buildings and Urban complexes) , 126‐140,
Thesaloniki: University Studio Press
Lavagne, H (1988) Il Mosaico attraverso i secoli, Ravenna: Longo
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 84
5. Discussion
Resources Ling, R (1998) Ancient Mosaics, London: British Museum Press
Locktov, J and Mastandrea, D (2003) Mosaic sourcebook, Hove: Apple
Loukianos, G (2002) Η τέχνη του ψηφιδωτού και η τεχνική του (The art of Mosaics
and the technique), Athens: Votsalo
Macdonald, S (1997) ‘Technical Responces to Typical Conservation Problems or
Architecture in England After the War – Current Research and Case Studies from
English Heritage’,in DOCOMOMO Conference Proceedings: Universality and
Heterogeneity, 179‐ 183 Bratislava: DOCOMOMO Slovakia
Mantouvalou, M and Kalantzopoulou, M (2005), Πολεοδομία και
πολιτικοκοινωνικά διακυβέυματα στην Ελλάδα του Μεσοπολέμου,
στοΕλευθέριος Βενιζελός και Ελλήνικη Πόλη (Urbanism and socioeconomic stakes
in Greece of the Interwar,in Eleutherios Venizelos and the Greek Town), 85‐90,
Athens: TEE
Maramotti‐ Politi, A (1996) ‘Ruskin fra architettura e restauro’, in Cassielo, S (ed)
La cultura del restauro, 117‐140, Venice: Marsilio
Marini, G (2003) I mosaici della Basilica di Aquileia, Aquileia: CISCRA
Markzinis, S (1968), Πολιτική ιστορία της Νεότερης Ελλάδος‐ Τόμος 4 (Political
History of Modern Greece‐ Part 4), Athens: Papyrus
Marmaras, B (1991), Η αστική πολυκατοικία της μεσοπολεμικής Αθήνας (Multi‐
storey buildings in Athens of interwar), Athens: ETBA
Maxwell, R (1998) Preface, in Cunningham, A (ed) Modern Movement Heritage,
xiii‐xvii, London: Routledge
Moiras, N (2001) ‘The entrance to Apartment Buildings of the Interwar period’, in
Fillipides, D (ed) Urban House of the 30s, 43‐50, Athens: Nireas
Munoz‐ Vinas, S (2005) Contemporary Theory if Conservation, Oxford: Elsevier
Butterworth – Heinemann
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 85
5. Discussion
Resources Napoleone, L (2005) ‘Cesare Brandi’, in Torsello, B (ed), Che cos’e’ il restauro?,91‐
94, Venice: Marsilio
Napoleone, L (2005b) ‘Alois Riegl’, in Torsello, B (ed), Che cos’e’ il restauro?, 73‐76,
Venice: Marsilio
Napoleone, L (2005c) ‘Eugene Emmanuel Viollet –le‐Duc’, in Torsello, B (ed), Che
cos’e’ il restauro?,107‐112, Venice: Marsilio
Orlandos, A (1994) Τα υλικά δομής των Αρχαίων Ελλήνων και οι τρόποι
εφαρμογής αυτών (The constructive materials of the ancient Greeks and their use),
Athens: En Athinais Arhaiologiki Etairia
Orsini, B (2004a) ‘Il mosaico: origini e tecniche’, in Guarino, M (ed), L’immagine e
il frammento ‐ Il mosaico in Emiglia‐Romagna,27‐33, Bologna: Compositori
Orsini, B (2004b) ‘Archeologia musiva in Emiglia‐ Romagna’, in Guarino, M (ed),
L’immagine e il frammento ‐ Il mosaico in Emiglia‐Romagna, 35‐43, Bologna:
Compositori
Overy, R (1999), Ιστορικός Άτλας του 20ου αιώνα (Historic Atlas of the 20th
century), Athens: Bibliosynergatiki
Pantelidou‐ Gkofa, M (1997) ‘Η Αθήνα στην προϊστορική εποχή’ στο
Αρχιτεκτονική και πολεοδομία από την αρχαιότητα έως σήμερα (‘Athens in
Prehistoric Times’,in Architecture and urbanism from antiquity till now – The case
of Athens), 23‐35, Athens: Arsenidi
Pantelodimos, D (1997) ‘Η Αθήνα σε περιηγητικά κείμενα του ΙΘ’ αιώνα’,
Αρχιτεκτονική και πολεοδομία από την αρχαιότητα έως σήμερα(‘Athens in
travelers texts of 18th century’, Architecture and urbanism from antiquity till now –
The case of Athens), 134‐141, Athens: Arsenidi
Papakonstantinou, D (2008) Μια συνεργασία για την καταγραφή του
μοντέρνου κινήματος της δεκαετίας του 1930 (A cooperation for the
documentation of the modern buildings of the thirties), Elliniki etairia. n. 30. 14
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 86
5. Discussion
Resources Papapetropoulos, D (2006), Νόμος 3028/2002 Για την προστασία των
αρχαιοτήτων και εν γένει της Πολιτιστικής Κληρονομιάς (Law 3028/2002 On the
Protection of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage in General), Thessaloniki: Sakkoula
Paris, R (1999) ‘Dalle origini al II secolo d. C.’,in Donati, A (ed) La forma del colore.
Mosaici dal antichita’ al XX secolo, 27‐33, Milano: Electa
Petzet, M (1995) In the full richness of their authenticity. The Test of Authenticity
and the New cult of Monuments’, in Nara Conference on Authenticity, 85‐99,
Trondheim: Tapir
Philippot, P (2005) ‘Forward’, in A History of Architectural Conservation, viii‐ix
Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth – Heinemann
Pretelli, M (1996) ‘Alois Riegl’, in Cassiello, S (ed), La cultura del restauro, 239‐252,
Venice: Marsilio
Prudon, T (2008) Preservation of Modern Architecture, New Jersey: John Wiley &
Sons
Raimondi, E (2004) ‘Un percosro ininterroto’, in Guarino, M (ed), L’immagine e il
frammento ‐ Il mosaico in Emiglia‐Romagna, 13‐22, Bologna: Compositori
Rigopoulos, D (2005), Μοντέρνα κτίρια η ώρα της κατεδάφισης (Modern
buildings time of demolition), I Kathimerini n. 26033. 20
Rigopoulos, D (2008), Τα ξεχασμένα διαμάντια του Μεσοπολέμου (The
forgotten diamandos of the Interwar) I Kathimerini n. 27034. 21
Ruhl, C (2003), ‘John Ruskin’, in Teoria del architettura 117 trattati dal rinascimento
a oggi, 462‐469, Koln:Taschen
Sette, M (2001) Il Restauro in Architettura, Torino: UTET
Shaffer, R J (2004), Weathering of natural building stones, Dorset: Donhead
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 87
5. Discussion
Resources Tosi, M (2004a) ‘Dal mosaico paleocristiano al mosaico moderno’, in Guarino, M
(ed), L’immagine e il frammento ‐ Il mosaico in Emiglia‐Romagna, 85‐93, Bologna:
Compositori
Tosi, M (2004b) Il Mosaico Contemporaneo Tradizione, evoluzione, tecnica e
conservazione, Milano: Mondadori
Tournikiotis, P (2000) Το δημόσιο ενδιαφέρων για τη μοντέρνα αρχιτεκτονική
στην Αθήνα του Μεσοπολέμου, στο Αθήναι από την κλασσική εποχή ως σήμερα
(Public interest on Modern architecture in Interwar Athens,in Athens form the
Classic ages till today), 370‐397, Athens: Kotinos
Tournikiotis, (1989) ‘Social Aspiration and Modern Architecture in Greece during
the Twenties and the Thirties’, in DOCOMOMO Conference Proceedings: Vision and
Reality, 241‐245, Stockholm: Docomomo Sweden
Travlos, I (1967) Νεοκλασική Αρχιτεκτονική στην Ελλάδα (Neoclassical
Architecture in Greece) Athens: Trapeza tis Ellados
Tsounis, G (2004) Γύρω από την Ακρόπολη (Around Acropolis), Athens: Explorer
Vassalo, V (1996) ‘Eugene Emmanuel Viollet –le‐Duc’, in Cassiello, S (ed), La
cultura del restauro, 69‐94, Venice: Marsilio
Vatopoulos, N (2000) Η Αθήνα σήμερα,στο Αθήναι από την κλασσική εποχή ως
σήμερα (Athens today,in Athens form the Classic ages till today), 370‐397, Athens:
Kotinos
Vatopoulos, N (2002) Το πρόσωπο της Αθήνας (The face of Athens), Athens:
Potamos
Vatopoulos, N (2002) Η πολυκατοικία γίνεται κλασσική (Multi‐storey buildings
are becoming classical)I Kathimerini 26.11.1999
Veremis, T (2008) Εμείς οι ‘Ελληνες –Πολεμική Ιστορία της Συγχρονής Ελλάδας
(We, Greeks – War History of Contemporary Greece), Athens: Sky
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 88
5. Discussion
Resources Vournas, T (1997), Ιστορία της νεώτερης και Σύγχρονης Ελλάδας‐ Τόμος Β (History
of Modern and Contemporary Greece), Athens: Pattakis
Vidulli Torlo, M (2005) Aquileia Mosaici, Trieste: Bruno Fachin
Vitruvius (Morgan, M. H. – trans) (1960), The Ten books on Architecture, New
York: Dover
Zivas, V (1991) Τα μνημεία και η πόλη (Monuments and the city), Athens: Libro
Unpublished resources
Arnold, G (1980) An appraisal of modern Buildings of the thirties in Britain,
unpublished MA dissertation, University of York
Charkiolakis, N (2007) Αναστύλωση, Ανάδειξη και βελτίωση της
επισκεψιμότητας των Μνημείων και Μνημειακών συνόλων στην περιοχή της
Πλάκας (Restoration, Evaluation and upgrading the visiting conditions of
Monuments of the area of Plaka) paper given at TEE ‐ Athens, Scientific Day
Conferences for the protection of the Cultural Heritage, 7 March 2007
Christ K(2001) Sacrosanct or Sacrificial? The future of Mid‐twentieth century
Heritage and the role of Design, unpublished MA dissertation, University of York
Ergolavou, M (2007), Η προστασία του πολιτιστικού περιβάλλοντος (The
protection of Cultural Heritage), unpublished assessment, Kapodisitrian
University of Athens
Kaukala, K (1990) Η ιδέα της κηπούπολης στην ελληνική πολεοδομία του
μεσοπολέμου (The idea of the “garden city” in the Urbanism of the Interwar),
unpublished Phd dissertation, Aristotelian Univeristy of Thessaloniki
Kosmaki, P (1991) Σχεδιασμένοι οικισμοί στην Αθήνα του Μεσοπολέμου
(Designed settlements in Interwar Athens), Unpublished PhD thesis, Athens
E.M.P. Polytechnic University
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 89
5. Discussion
Resources Kotsaki, A (2005) Το έργο του αρχιτέκτονα Αλέξανδρου Νικολούδη (1875‐1944)
ως έκφραση του οράματος για αστικό εκσυγχρονισμό επί Ελευθερίου
Βενιζέλου (The work of architect Alexander Nikoloudis (1875 ‐ 1944) as
expression of the vision for urban modernization during Eleftherios Venizelos
time). Unpublished PhD thesis, Athens E.M.P. Polytechnic University
Ladogianni, G (1989) Το περιοδικό "Ιδέα" 1933‐1934. Παρέμβαση στην κοινωνική
κρίση και την αισθητική αναζήτηση (Magazine Idea1933‐34,Interference with
the social crisis and the aesthetical research), unpublished PhD dissertation,
Ioannina Unevirsity
Maragou, T (1999) Rehabilitation and enhancement of historic fabric in Athens,
unpublished MA dissertation, University of York
Tapini (2007) Heritage conservation in the Interwar: Italy, Greece, Cyprus,
unpublished summative assessment, University of York
Papadam‐ Riza, E (2002) Η συμβολή της πολυκατοικίας στη γέννηση της
ελληνικής οικοδομικής (Contribution of urban multi‐dwelling inthe birth of
contemporary Greek construction), Unpublished PhD thesis, Athens E.M.P.
Polytechnic University
Papdopoulou, E (2007) Methods and techniques for the conservation of
reinforced concrete buildings, unpublished MA dissertation, University of York
Raptis, P (1997) Οι εκπαιδευτικές μεταρρυθμίσεις του μεσοπολέμου στην
Ελλάδα (Educational reform of the Interwar in Greece), unpublished PhD
dissertation, Panteion University
Vasenhofen, L (2007) Πόλεις και βιώσιμη ανάπτυξη (Cities and sustainable
development), conference held in 5 November 2007 for Elliniki Etaireia, Athens
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 90
5. Discussion
Resources Web resources
Agios savvas Hospital, http://www.agsavvas‐
hosp.gr/site/main/details.php?type=1&catID=52&lang=el, page consulted 22
December 2008
Areopagitou 17 BlogSpot on the Salvation of two listed buildings on Areopagitou
street: http://areopagitou17.blogspot.com/ , page consulted 20 December 2008
Hellenic Ministry for the Environment Physical planning and public works, listed
buildings directory: http://estia.minenv.gr/ , pages consulted from 7 December
2008 till 2 February 2009
Koumantaropoulou, M Michailidis, M (1994) Διατηρητέα Νεοκλασικά της
Αθήνας (Neoclassical buildings of Athens to conserve)
http://www.weblab.gr/ak/AthensAtrcheo/AthensIndex.html, , Page consulted 20
February 2008
Raptis, P (2007) Η εκπαιδευτική μεταρρυθμιστική κίνηση του Μεσοπολέμου
στην Ελλάδα συναφείες και αποκλείσεις στον κύκλο της θεσμικής ασυνέχειας
(Educational reform in the Interwar in Greece: relevancies and irrelevances in the
cycle of constitutional discontinuity), http://conf2007.edu.uoi.gr/Praktika/97‐
151.pdf , Page Consulted 10 August 2008
International council on monuments and sites, ‘Nara Document on Authenticity’:
http://www.international.icomos.org/naradoc_eng.htm, page consulted 10
December 2008
National Center for research, Archaeology of the city of Athens, contemporary
monuments database: http://www.eie.gr/archaeologia/Gr/arxeio.aspx , pages
consulted from 7 December 2008 till 2 February 2009
Foundation of the Hellenic world:
http://www.fhw.gr/chronos/14/gr/1923_1940/civilization/choros/02.html#, page
consulted 16 December 2008
TERRAZZO AND MOSAIC FLOORS IN INTERWAR BUILDINGS IN ATHENS: Conservation Issues
The University of York – MA in Conservation Studies, 2009 91
5. Discussion
Resources Getty Conservation Institute, ‘Illustrated Glossary: Mosaics In Situ Project.’ 2003,
http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications/pdf_publications/bibs.html The
Getty Conservation Institute and the Israel Antiquities Authority, page consulted
26 October 2008
Hellenic Ministry of Culture, ‘Law 1469/1950’:
http://www.yppo.gr/5/51/neot/n1469.jsp, page consulted 10 December 2008
Hellenic Society for Law and antiquity, ‘Law 3028/2002’: http://www.law‐
archaeology.gr/Index.asp?C=136, page consulted 10 December 2008
Tournikiotis, p (2009) Μια κοσμοπολίτικη πολυκατοικία στα Ιλίσια ( A
cosmopolitan multi‐ storey building at Ilissia):
http://www.monumenta.org/article.php?IssueID=2&perm=1&ArticleID=315&Cate
goryID=6&lang=gr , page consulted 26 January 2009